This topic is locked from further discussion.
Judging from that video, i would say KZ3 looks better, but this is an unfair comparison. The quality is a bit weak, and the environment isnt a show case one. Also, that looks fantastic. The fact that we are even comparing it to KZ3 must mean that it's atleast close to the game's graphical quality, so I don't know wh haters are saying it looks bad. But one thing is for sure, I still think KZ2 has the best gun models of any game out there, yes, even better than Crysis on PC with everything on MAX. :P
Same here , all the hype regarding gfx was gone after that for me.After seeing the E3 demo which was PC gameplay played with a 360 controller (why?), I'm not holding out much hope.
clyde46
the word "awful" can mean worse then original, in gameplay, graphics, and location of story etc. All I know is that Crysis 2 will be affected for the worse because it being multiplat implies console limits and ideals shaped and formed the game mechanics, level sizes etc.I have no idea how that could be considered "awful".
Teufelhuhn
Same here , all the hype regarding gfx was gone after that for me.[QUOTE="clyde46"]
After seeing the E3 demo which was PC gameplay played with a 360 controller (why?), I'm not holding out much hope.
RoOodriGowW
Learn to read:
This is PC footage.
ALL GAMEPLAY FOOTAGE SHOWN HAS BEEN FROM THE 360 VERSION AS BEEN PROVED BY CRY-SAM FROM CRYMOD. LinkLink.
[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]the word "awful" can mean worse then original, in gameplay, graphics, and location of story etc. All I know is that Crysis 2 will be affected for the worse because it being multiplat implies console limits and ideals shaped and formed the game mechanics, level sizes etc.I have no idea how that could be considered "awful".
04dcarraher
OMG what a shock NY is smaller then the amazon jungle.:roll:
lets be real here if aliens were to invade the world they sure as hell won't start raging there war
in the jungle loool.
It just doesn't feel all 'there' to me. Watching gameplay, I feel as though I will end up preferring the original Crysis, regardless of how much better 2 will (or won't :P) look.
psn8214
Have faith. :) These are small levels for E3 purposes. Remember, there's still tons of envoirements they'll show, Central Park, broken water mains causing flooded streets. They havn't even showed the weapon customization or suit customization. BELIEVE!
the word "awful" can mean worse then original04dcarraher
No."Awful" means "very bad and/or unpleasant", which most certainly that trailer was not.
[QUOTE="psn8214"]
It just doesn't feel all 'there' to me. Watching gameplay, I feel as though I will end up preferring the original Crysis, regardless of how much better 2 will (or won't :P) look.
WhenCicadasCry
Have faith. :) These are small levels for E3 purposes. Remember, there's still tons of envoirements they'll show, Central Park, broken water mains causing flooded streets. They havn't even showed the weapon customization or suit customization. BELIEVE!
I want to, I really do, but I'm missing stalking around in the jungle right about now. :( All that gameplay really isn't doing it for me. I'm still pumped to see the PC reveal though.
there is no way you can objectively say that looks "awful". "Disappointing" or "mediocre" mightbe believable, but that is a decently good looking game, at worst.
[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]
[QUOTE="psn8214"]
It just doesn't feel all 'there' to me. Watching gameplay, I feel as though I will end up preferring the original Crysis, regardless of how much better 2 will (or won't :P) look.
psn8214
Have faith. :) These are small levels for E3 purposes. Remember, there's still tons of envoirements they'll show, Central Park, broken water mains causing flooded streets. They havn't even showed the weapon customization or suit customization. BELIEVE!
I want to, I really do, but I'm missing stalking around in the jungle right about now. :( All that gameplay really isn't doing it for me. I'm still pumped to see the PC reveal though.
I'll be lying if I'm not a bit dissapointed, but if it means it's more atmospheric and cinematic, almost movie like, then I think that's a fair trade off. Obviously it's all down to preference though. :(
I'll be lying if I'm not a bit dissapointed, but if it means it's more atmospheric and cinematic, almost movie like, then I think that's a fair trade off. Obviously it's all down to preference though. :(
WhenCicadasCry
Yeah, I personally don't care how movie-like it is! :P I just feel like I'm going to miss the organic feeling of just stealthing around the jungle a lot. I don't like this new setting one bit. :(
[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]the word "awful" can mean worse then original, in gameplay, graphics, and location of story etc. All I know is that Crysis 2 will be affected for the worse because it being multiplat implies console limits and ideals shaped and formed the game mechanics, level sizes etc. No, awful means bad/terrible. We haven't seen enough of the gameplay/story/location to class it as terrible yet (although who knows, it may be). And didn't Crytek themselves say a few months back that they only needed to modify very few things for multiplat? Very few...something like 1 in every 100 cases or something.I have no idea how that could be considered "awful".
04dcarraher
I thought it looked terrific as well, and I'm quite the critic in regards to graphics.Are we watching the same vid? I think it looks fantastic :|
PAL360
Same here , all the hype regarding gfx was gone after that for me.[QUOTE="RoOodriGowW"]
[QUOTE="clyde46"]
After seeing the E3 demo which was PC gameplay played with a 360 controller (why?), I'm not holding out much hope.
WhenCicadasCry
Learn to read:
This is PC footage.
ALL GAMEPLAY FOOTAGE SHOWN HAS BEEN FROM THE 360 VERSION AS BEEN PROVED BY CRY-SAM FROM CRYMOD. LinkLink.
no, the exact quote is - "PC, 360 SPECS" now why would they do that? you dont see guerilla running killzone 3 on PC with PS3 specs last time i checked, crysis 2 at 60 frames per second wasnt a "360 spec"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JS1ldO37R6k I knew crytek was lying "Console versions will look just as good as PC versions" why do companies even say this non sense? That video looks terrible, doesnt look any better than Halo 3, seriously. I hope the graphics improve greatly because right now they are underwhelming
ColonelDrakePS3
Wtf are you guys talking about (primarily the first page)? During E3, I saw people on here praising the game as looking better than KZ2, UC2, etc, and now it looks as bad as Halo 3? It's the same footage, and I'd say it's on par with KZ2, and that's with destructibility. I still love KZ2's graphics and play it every day, and there is no way that looks like crap. Did you even see the dynamic lighting near the end when the aliens/meteors were hitting the building? Crytek's been saying that everything is rendered in realtime. I'd take it with a pinch of salt, but when it looks that good and does all of these things like destructibility, lighting (perhaps HDR), pretty fine shading, and even looks to have some ambient occlusion (which is a processor crippler even on high end PCs)...do you see where I'm going with this? :P I think the game looks amazing, and with 5 months to polish it, expect it to look even better/ run more smoothly.
[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"][QUOTE="RoOodriGowW"]Same here , all the hype regarding gfx was gone after that for me.
i_am_interested
Learn to read:
This is PC footage.
ALL GAMEPLAY FOOTAGE SHOWN HAS BEEN FROM THE 360 VERSION AS BEEN PROVED BY CRY-SAM FROM CRYMOD. LinkLink.
no, the exact quote is - "PC, 360 SPECS" now why would they do that? you dont see guerilla running killzone 3 on PC with PS3 specs last time i checked, crysis 2 at 60 frames per second wasnt a "360 spec" Because the game is still in development and the PC version may be the most stable at this exact time?Are we watching the same vid? I think it looks fantastic :|
PAL360
was thinking exactly the same here
only letdown is when its an alien closeby, that looks bad. but still... it looks great to me
[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"][QUOTE="RoOodriGowW"]Same here , all the hype regarding gfx was gone after that for me.
i_am_interested
Learn to read:
This is PC footage.
ALL GAMEPLAY FOOTAGE SHOWN HAS BEEN FROM THE 360 VERSION AS BEEN PROVED BY CRY-SAM FROM CRYMOD. LinkLink.
no, the exact quote is - "PC, 360 SPECS" now why would they do that? you dont see guerilla running killzone 3 on PC with PS3 specs last time i checked, crysis 2 at 60 frames per second wasnt a "360 spec"Because it's their first 360 game? It's unstable at the moment. And those vids were not running at 60fps. It seemed locked at 30. :roll:
no, the exact quote is - "PC, 360 SPECS" now why would they do that? you dont see guerilla running killzone 3 on PC with PS3 specs last time i checked, crysis 2 at 60 frames per second wasnt a "360 spec"[QUOTE="i_am_interested"][QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]
Learn to read:
This is PC footage.
ALL GAMEPLAY FOOTAGE SHOWN HAS BEEN FROM THE 360 VERSION AS BEEN PROVED BY CRY-SAM FROM CRYMOD. LinkLink.
WhenCicadasCry
Because it's their first 360 game? It's unstable at the moment. And those vids were not running at 60fps. It seemed locked at 30. :roll:
even the footage they tried to pass off as "console" footage on gametrailers tv was running at 60+ frames per second say what you want about the video itself, but that demonstration is not 30 frames per second[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]
I'll be lying if I'm not a bit dissapointed, but if it means it's more atmospheric and cinematic, almost movie like, then I think that's a fair trade off. Obviously it's all down to preference though. :(
psn8214
Yeah, I personally don't care how movie-like it is! :P I just feel like I'm going to miss the organic feeling of just stealthing around the jungle a lot. I don't like this new setting one bit. :(
What about the skulking around office blocks, peering down at the streets while aliens walk past executing helpless civilians, before jumping from one skyscraper to the next. Or planning your next assault before lunging out the skyscraper window, landing in a huge thud as you hit the pavement. You can drive taxis and stuff too. :) The mission showed at E3 was a push towards Central Station to aid the Marines, so ofcourse it's going to be urgent, but I'm sure there will be times where it's slow paced.
Looks like a scene from every other boring FPS game. Any clue when we are actually going to see some innovation in the FPS genre?
Any clue when we are actually going to see some innovation in the FPS genre?UnknownSniper65Not anytime soon. Not tha I mind, I think innovation is overrated.
I don't know, once you click the 720p version it doesn't look so bad. It's no Killzone 3, I agree, but It actually looks pretty good.
[QUOTE="BELOW_MEE"]Increase the YouTube resol to 720 Still looks better than Killzone 3 :DP-vs-P
I'm sorry but if you really THAT looks better than KZ3, there's something wrong with your eyes or judgment or you just hate the PS3/KZ3.
You mean this?
Here's the difference between Killzone 3 and Crysis 2. Killzone 3, blocky, blurry textures, and wierd geometry. It looks fake: And crysis, realistic, clean and sharp, with amazing lighting.
i love how this guys picks the best and worst situations depending on what hes defending POST THE VIDS that those came fromi_am_interested
Me? I was trying to show the difference between the fundementals. Killzones blurry blocky textures vs Crysis 2s ultra sharp, "I can make out what that is not like Killzone 3s wtf is that a machine or a box?" objects / textures.
nevermind, this guy likes to compare blurry screen caps from actual vids to published press release screen capsi_am_interestedThey're both blurry screencaps so it's fair. I have nothing else to go on. :P
They're both blurry screencaps so it's fair. I have nothing else to go on. :P no, its no fair, that crysis shot its a published press release shot given from crytek to ign your killzone shot is from a video in motion actually DISPLAYING MOTION BLUR why don you post some more of those 3d killzone shots while youre at it[QUOTE="i_am_interested"]nevermind, this guy likes to compare blurry screen caps from actual vids to published press release screen capsWhenCicadasCry
[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]They're both blurry screencaps so it's fair. I have nothing else to go on. :P no, its no fair, that crysis shot its a published press release shot given from crytek to ign your killzone shot is from a video in motion actually DISPLAYING MOTION BLUR why don you post some more of those 3d killzone shots while youre at it[QUOTE="i_am_interested"]nevermind, this guy likes to compare blurry screen caps from actual vids to published press release screen capsi_am_interested
I just took that Crysis 2 pic from the video in the TCs post, notice the IGN logo at the bottom? :| And that Killzone 3 pic was taken using GOMS burst capture, and that was the clearing pic out of the lot. It's not my fault Killzone features tons of blur. =\
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment