Crysis 2 Xbox 360 gameplay footage.. graphics look awful

Graphics look fine to me.

You just want Foliage.

still looks better than kz 3 to me :?

Dead-Memories

what's sad is you're wrong & KZ3 still is in alpha build.

yet this game still doesn't compare

That looked great, I have no idea what the OP is talking about.

And LOL at the guy who thinks the PC and 360 versions are identical in terms of graphics.

[QUOTE="Dead-Memories"]

still looks better than kz 3 to me :?

Impress3

what's sad is you're wrong & KZ3 still is in alpha build.

yet this game still doesn't compare

That looked great, I have no idea what the OP is talking about.

And LOL at the guy who thinks the PC and 360 versions are identical in terms of graphics.

Cali3350

If you are talking about me, that is not at all what I was saying...

[QUOTE="Dead-Memories"]

still looks better than kz 3 to me :?

Impress3

what's sad is you're wrong & KZ3 still is in alpha build.

yet this game still doesn't compare

The things I'm concerned about though is the lighting, character models, and physics.

If you watch the first part of Crysis 2 in that video and looked at the two marines, try and compare them to this:

Seriesly, to me they both looked like plastic toy soldiers.. :?

For the lighting, watch the video in 02:20. Maybe it's just me but the lighting in Killzone 2 looks on par or better than Crysis 2's lighting:

Notice it doesn't just show the light projecting to the object but it also has the glare effect.

As for the physics, if you look at Killzone 2's recoil and the particles' phsyics from the weapons and explosions, it's arguable...

Like I said the "Graphics King" crown for me is still debatable until mentioned contender games (Crysis 2, KZ3, Rage etc) have been released. Until then, we're just talking nonsense.

The things I'm concerned about though is the lighting, character models, and physics.

If you watch the first part of Crysis 2 in that video and looked at the two marines, try and compare them to this:

Seriesly, to me they both looked like plastic toy soldiers.. :?

For the lighting, watch the video in 02:20. Maybe it's just me but the lighting in Killzone 2 looks on par or better than Crysis 2's lighting:

Notice it doesn't just show the light projecting to the object but it also has the glare effect.

As for the physics, if you look at Killzone 2's recoil and the particles' phsyics from the weapons and explosions, it's arguable...

Like I said the "Graphics King" crown for me is still debatable until mentioned contender games (Crysis 2, KZ3, Rage etc) have been released. Until then, we're just talking nonsense.

Bazooka_4ME

No you'll still be talking nonsense because you are trying to compare graphics from multiple games with no actual proof on which technically looks better, and can't seem to figure out that there is no such things as the graphic king. Do you see art enthusiats trying to declare a paint or scupture king???, no because it's all subjective.

For the past year + people have been calling Crysis the undisputable graphics king.... I wouldn't put it above super mario galaxy 2 and plenty of other games released in 2009.

The things I'm concerned about though is the lighting, character models, and physics.

If you watch the first part of Crysis 2 in that video and looked at the two marines, try and compare them to this:

Seriesly, to me they both looked like plastic toy soldiers.. :?

For the lighting, watch the video in 02:20. Maybe it's just me but the lighting in Killzone 2 looks on par or better than Crysis 2's lighting:

Notice it doesn't just show the light projecting to the object but it also has the glare effect.

As for the physics, if you look at Killzone 2's recoil and the particles' phsyics from the weapons and explosions, it's arguable...

Like I said the "Graphics King" crown for me is still debatable until mentioned contender games (Crysis 2, KZ3, Rage etc) have been released. Until then, we're just talking nonsense.

Bazooka_4ME

I agree the Marines, and even civilians look really really bad in C2, like last gen. :( Hopefully they're just placeholder. :) But C2s lighting is amazing.

No you'll still be talking nonsense because you are trying to compare graphics from multiple games with no actual proof on which technically looks better, and can't seem to figure out that there is no such things as the graphic king. Do you see art enthusiats trying to declare a paint or scupture king???, no because it's all subjective.

For the past year + people have been calling Crysis the undisputable graphics king.... I wouldn't put it above super mario galaxy 2 and plenty of other games released in 2009.

deangallop

[QUOTE="deangallop"]No you'll still be talking nonsense because you are trying to compare graphics from multiple games with no actual proof on which technically looks better, and can't seem to figure out that there is no such things as the graphic king. Do you see art enthusiats trying to declare a paint or scupture king???, no because it's all subjective.

For the past year + people have been calling Crysis the undisputable graphics king.... I wouldn't put it above super mario galaxy 2 and plenty of other games released in 2009.

Bazooka_4ME

Yeah exactly, and you will be talking nonsense when these games are released because nobody ever actually proves anything when it comes to these "graphic king threads" and even if you could prove that there was a singular title that looks slightly better than everything else.... why should anybody actually care. deangallop

Not exactly, that's why people are trying to bust in the "console" graphics king argument. Everyone knows Crysis is still the graphics king. But some sites like GameTrailers, CVG, including IGN and Gamespot are praising games such as KZ2 and UC2 with great visuals that made it sound like Crysis didn't exist... WHICH brings us to why people here still debate about "console" graphics king.

I don't know exactly where you're coming from but when these games are released, people AREN'T gonna be talking nonsense. If they are then professional reviewers who will be reviewing the game will be talking nonsense as well. Because depending on what they say will greatly reflect on what fanboys here at SW will say.

Looks fine to me. Maybe you were expecting too much.

I played the video at 720p and it looks great to me. Try upping your resolution.

I played the video at 720p and it looks great to me. Try upping your resolution.

TroyM1

Increase the YouTube resol to 720 Still looks better than Killzone 3 :DBELOW_MEE

Apparently, I am the only one who is disappointed about the fact that ,gameplay wise, the game is exactly like every other FPS in the last ten years. The hero runs into a fighting area full of enemies,wipes them out,defends it against odds and ultimately takes out some giant enemy with a rocket launcher.

FPS games have been using this exact formula since COD1.

Increase the YouTube resol to 720 Still looks better than Killzone 3 :DBELOW_MEE

i know it funny hes posting this and not kilzone3 graphics are awfull. this game looks really good with steady framerates. acording to his older post i cant tell hes a ps3 fanboy.

i see what hes trying to do this fanboy.

Think Crysis 2 looks too "clean" on this one. Killzone 3 has more weather and particle effects going on.