Crysis 3 "Tech" trailer. Graphics King confirmed.

I want to see what DX10 looks like since that's what my PC will probably be able to handle.

jun_aka_pekto

did I not hear the game doesn't support Dx10? or am I imagining things? :?

[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]

I want to see what DX10 looks like since that's what my PC will probably be able to handle.

seanmcloughlin

did I not hear the game doesn't support Dx10? or am I imagining things? :?

I got it from this. Not sure if it's bogus or not.

http://digitalbattle.com/crysis-3-system-requirements/

this is nice for those whos entire life is around gaming.

GrayF0X786

unbelievable stuff.

sts106mat

Not on PS3 and Xbox 360.

To get that beauty, you'll have to beef up your PC and get that version.

[QUOTE="GrayF0X786"]

this is nice for those whos entire life is around gaming.

parkurtommo

I'd say he's taking a jab at PC gamers. :lol: Oh well. *shrugs*

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

unbelievable stuff.

GamerwillzPS

Not on PS3 and Xbox 360.

To get that beauty, you'll have to beef up your PC and get that version.

Or just wait for the vanilla DX11 Durango/Orbis version because Crytek got to make that multiplat money.

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

unbelievable stuff.

sts106mat

Not on PS3 and Xbox 360.

To get that beauty, you'll have to beef up your PC and get that version.

Then you'll get less than 30fps with crappy textures while PC gamers will enjoy beautiful HD visuals with >60fps (depending on hardware).

[QUOTE="sts106mat"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Not on PS3 and Xbox 360.

To get that beauty, you'll have to beef up your PC and get that version.

GamerwillzPS

Then you'll get less than 30fps with crappy textures while PC gamers will enjoy beautiful HD visuals with >60fps (depending on hardware).

HINT: The trailer said next gen ready... PC as it is... Is actually current gen since it's already running games with DX11 APIs. DX11 support is a joke for PC at the moment... But things will get very interesting for PC development once the new consoles arrive. Everything will be made with DX11 in mind.

[QUOTE="PAL360"]Looks like we have a new PC and console graphics king. Looks amazing!gpuking

Now that's what i'm talking about. Hopefully Crysis 3 will look like that at max.

[QUOTE="sts106mat"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Not on PS3 and Xbox 360.

To get that beauty, you'll have to beef up your PC and get that version.

GamerwillzPS

Then you'll get less than 30fps with crappy textures while PC gamers will enjoy beautiful HD visuals with >60fps (depending on hardware).

To console player, Crytek said that the CryEngine 3 for Crysis 2 was horribly optimized on every platform. They had a different team doing the bulk of the work for Crysis 2 while Crytek Germany was working on the engine. However they couldn't keep sending updates to the engine during development so they had to settle on a very terribly optimized version.

On their CryDev forums, they've completely admitted that the optimization was terrible on the console and PC equally. The PC had a bad implementation of DX11 as well.

Since I have no reason to doubt them, as Crysis 2 had a lot of graphical issues, I can believe that the game is going to look stellar on all 3 platforms with a much better framerate. The amount of detail they are putting into just a single level is good evidence that they know that detail won't go to waste and their engine can really handle it now.

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="sts106mat"] i doubt i'll bother.sts106mat

Then you'll get less than 30fps with crappy textures while PC gamers will enjoy beautiful HD visuals with >60fps (depending on hardware).

Okay but I hate sitting on the sofa or lying down while playing games. It's just very uncomfortable. No concentration to games. I prefer playing on a proper chair with all of my hardware on the desk. Like a PC gamer. Much better, and that's how I play games better.

[QUOTE="Rocker6"]

[QUOTE="parkurtommo"] I guarantee you one 670 won't be enough to play this maxed out, that is, assuming it will look like this. (probably won't)seanmcloughlin

Crysis 2 modded with MaldoHD often matches the stuff shown in the video,and my OC'd 670 GTX handles it maxed out just fine.

If the game ends up properly optimised,and not some rushed crapjob,I see no reason why a single 670 GTX couldn't handle it on 1080p...

Well CE3 is much more fleshed out now since C2 hit, they have had time to optimise it to hell and back and make it run a lot smoother, it also has proper Dx11 implementation now from the get go and not patched in. Im sure Crytek have learned their lesson after C2 bombed, they even said it backfired themselves.

I think a 670 can handle max 1080p at about 40-50 fps but I am not expecting constant 60

I'm not so easily trusting,but yeah,I hope you and Wasdie(check the post above) are correct...

For me,as long as the frame rate stays consistently over 45 FPS,I'm fine...

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="Rocker6"]

Crysis 2 modded with MaldoHD often matches the stuff shown in the video,and my OC'd 670 GTX handles it maxed out just fine.

If the game ends up properly optimised,and not some rushed crapjob,I see no reason why a single 670 GTX couldn't handle it on 1080p...

Rocker6

Well CE3 is much more fleshed out now since C2 hit, they have had time to optimise it to hell and back and make it run a lot smoother, it also has proper Dx11 implementation now from the get go and not patched in. Im sure Crytek have learned their lesson after C2 bombed, they even said it backfired themselves.

I think a 670 can handle max 1080p at about 40-50 fps but I am not expecting constant 60

I'm not so easily trusting,but yeah,I hope you and Wasdie(check the post above) are correct...

For me,as long as the frame rate stays consistently over 45 FPS,I'm fine...

What GPU do you have? Im sure it will run the same as C2 with better visuals or better than C2 depending

[QUOTE="Rocker6"]

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Well CE3 is much more fleshed out now since C2 hit, they have had time to optimise it to hell and back and make it run a lot smoother, it also has proper Dx11 implementation now from the get go and not patched in. Im sure Crytek have learned their lesson after C2 bombed, they even said it backfired themselves.

I think a 670 can handle max 1080p at about 40-50 fps but I am not expecting constant 60

seanmcloughlin

I'm not so easily trusting,but yeah,I hope you and Wasdie(check the post above) are correct...

For me,as long as the frame rate stays consistently over 45 FPS,I'm fine...

What GPU do you have? Im sure it will run the same as C2 with better visuals or better than C2 depending

Asus 670 GTX DC2 OC'd...

I just wanted to say that I'm not really sure Crytek will pay any special attention to the PC version.As pointed out,these "tech trailers" may just as well end up being bull-vids,to improve the PR image...

It's just that I don't trust projects under EA.I don't give them a benefit of a doubt anymore.

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="Rocker6"]

I'm not so easily trusting,but yeah,I hope you and Wasdie(check the post above) are correct...

For me,as long as the frame rate stays consistently over 45 FPS,I'm fine...

Rocker6

What GPU do you have? Im sure it will run the same as C2 with better visuals or better than C2 depending

Asus 670 GTX DC2 OC'd...

I just wanted to say that I'm not really sure Crytek will pay any special attention to the PC version.As pointed out,these "tech trailers" may just as well end up being bull-vids,to improve the PR image...

It's just that I don't trust projects under EA.I don't give them a benefit of a doubt anymore.

Exact same GPU as mine :P it's sucha beast

Crytek know they messed up though and can't afford to do so again or it will bomb in sales like it did before. Even right now not many people will buy it due to C2 so they need to give special attention to the game for sales. If not then they're out of pocket. Also UE4 will threaten them soon and they need to show what their engine can do in game on a PC. A lot hangs on this game for them.

But then again if all goes to sh!t I really won't be surprised either :P

[QUOTE="Rocker6"]

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

What GPU do you have? Im sure it will run the same as C2 with better visuals or better than C2 depending

seanmcloughlin

Asus 670 GTX DC2 OC'd...

I just wanted to say that I'm not really sure Crytek will pay any special attention to the PC version.As pointed out,these "tech trailers" may just as well end up being bull-vids,to improve the PR image...

It's just that I don't trust projects under EA.I don't give them a benefit of a doubt anymore.

Exact same GPU as mine :P it's sucha beast

Crytek know they messed up though and can't afford to do so again or it will bomb in sales like it did before. Even right now not many people will buy it due to C2 so they need to give special attention to the game for sales. If not then they're out of pocket. Also UE4 will threaten them soon and they need to show what their engine can do in game on a PC. A lot hangs on this game for them.

But then again if all goes to sh!t I really won't be surprised either :P

That is a reasonable viewpoint,let's hope their line of thinking works that way too.But it's EA we're talking about,they never attempt to put out something bold,they're always in the second place,by copying their competitors,in the mad pursuit of "wider audiences"...

Still,assumptions are useless.Guess it's the best to just wait and see,while hoping for the best...

And yeah,that card's a beast.I love it,the best piece of hardware I ever got my hands on,runs cold and quiet,while performing awesome.Only gripe I have with it is mediocre OC results.Got a bad chip,with full Kepler boost in effect,I top out on 1202 Mhz.

That's mediocre,most cards easily hit 1250 Mhz under same situations,and I even saw people taking it to 1300+ Mhz territory(all on air,ofc)...

There's a difference between a tech demo and what will be in the actual game. Anyone remember Cryengine 3 tech demo and all previews before Crysis 2 came out? Crytek are excellent liars and know what to use to get people hyped for a game. I'll believe it when I see it and as long as the game is multiplatform the game still has to be designed around the lowest common denominator which are the consoles. Unless they specifically focused and had a separate team working on Pc assets we will not see the level of detail and effects seen in this demo.04dcarraher

Go watch the Crysis 3 E3 demo, it looks exactly the same.

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]There's a difference between a tech demo and what will be in the actual game. Anyone remember Cryengine 3 tech demo and all previews before Crysis 2 came out? Crytek are excellent liars and know what to use to get people hyped for a game. I'll believe it when I see it and as long as the game is multiplatform the game still has to be designed around the lowest common denominator which are the consoles. Unless they specifically focused and had a separate team working on Pc assets we will not see the level of detail and effects seen in this demo.Peredith

Go watch the Crysis 3 E3 demo, it looks exactly the same.

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="Truth_Hurts_U"]My gtx 690 will eat this game and Metro last light. :)Riadon2

Aw just go suck a D!ck :P Hoping my 670 is up to the task anyway. Definitely Metro, that game will destroy everything. Hopefully it's better optimised than 2033 though

What exactly is wrong with Metro 2033's optimization? I can play it maxed out minus advanced DOF at 1080p with a single 670 and only drop below 60 fps in scenes with heavy volumetric lighting combined with heavy action, and never under 50. Plus, it is easily the best looking game for PC right now (other than The Witcher 2).

I can't really say which game looks better, Battlefield 3 or Crysis 3

[QUOTE="Riadon2"]

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Aw just go suck a D!ck :P Hoping my 670 is up to the task anyway. Definitely Metro, that game will destroy everything. Hopefully it's better optimised than 2033 though

mitu123

What exactly is wrong with Metro 2033's optimization? I can play it maxed out minus advanced DOF at 1080p with a single 670 and only drop below 60 fps in scenes with heavy volumetric lighting combined with heavy action, and never under 50. Plus, it is easily the best looking game for PC right now (other than The Witcher 2).

It's very sporadic too. Some areas are great and others are performance hogs with nothing going on, it jumps all over the place. That and Physx drags it down without looking all that spectacular or noticeable. On full max the game actually looks worse than just Dx10 because the DOF is crap. And tesselation isn't noticeable at all apart from your frames.

In short it should run better for what's on screen sometimes. But then again it looks insane sometimes. Can't wait for it's big brother to launch

I can't really say which game looks better, Battlefield 3 or Crysis 3

RoccoHout

I think CE3 is technically able to do more than Frostbite. Especially when it comes to particles but I could be wrong. Also seems to do tesselation and occlussion mapping better on environmetn details. Doesn't have flat trees and flat ground textures. Artistically they both have horrible dirt on the screen and lens flare effects

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Riadon2"]

What exactly is wrong with Metro 2033's optimization? I can play it maxed out minus advanced DOF at 1080p with a single 670 and only drop below 60 fps in scenes with heavy volumetric lighting combined with heavy action, and never under 50. Plus, it is easily the best looking game for PC right now (other than The Witcher 2).

seanmcloughlin

It's very sporadic too. Some areas are great and others are performance hogs with nothing going on, it jumps all over the place. That and Physx drags it down without looking all that spectacular or noticeable. On full max the game actually looks worse than just Dx10 because the DOF is crap. And tesselation isn't noticeable at all apart from your frames.

In short it should run better for what's on screen sometimes. But then again it looks insane sometimes. Can't wait for it's big brother to launch

Looks like I found the target graphics for my next upgrade.

I can't really say which game looks better, Battlefield 3 or Crysis 3

RoccoHout

Artistically they both have horrible dirt on the screen and lens flare effects.seanmcloughlin

[QUOTE="RoccoHout"]

I can't really say which game looks better, Battlefield 3 or Crysis 3

parkurtommo

Wish I knew the requirements for these things.

ActionRemix

Own a console :P

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]

Wish I knew the requirements for these things.

aroxx_ab

Own a console :P

I dont think he wants to play on low

[QUOTE="aroxx_ab"]

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]

Wish I knew the requirements for these things.

lostrib

Own a console :P

I dont think he wants to play on low

Or without... any of the tech from that demo.

On topic: holy f**king sh!t. And the Star Wars devs were saying it's gonna be another 10 years before graphics were indistinguishable from reality.

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="aroxx_ab"]

Own a console :P

the_bi99man

I dont think he wants to play on low

Or without... any of the tech from that demo.

On topic: holy f**king sh!t. And the Star Wars devs were saying it's gonna be another 10 years before graphics were indistinguishable from reality.

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="aroxx_ab"]

Own a console :P

the_bi99man

I dont think he wants to play on low

Or without... any of the tech from that demo.

On topic: holy f**king sh!t. And the Star Wars devs were saying it's gonna be another 10 years before graphics were indistinguishable from reality.

[QUOTE="aroxx_ab"]

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]

Wish I knew the requirements for these things.

lostrib

Own a console :P

I dont think he wants to play on low

I think this game will look amazing on all platforms, even for consoles, not like this going to be a open world game.

[QUOTE="the_bi99man"]

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

I dont think he wants to play on low

parkurtommo

Or without... any of the tech from that demo.

On topic: holy f**king sh!t. And the Star Wars devs were saying it's gonna be another 10 years before graphics were indistinguishable from reality.

Not saying that that video is indistinguishable from reality, but more that it's proof that graphics that good are less than 10 years off.

ALL GLORY TO THE TESSELLATED TOAD!

ALL GLORY TO THE TESSELLATED TOAD!

NoodleFighter

.

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]

I want to see what DX10 looks like since that's what my PC will probably be able to handle.

jun_aka_pekto

did I not hear the game doesn't support Dx10? or am I imagining things? :?

I got it from this. Not sure if it's bogus or not.

http://digitalbattle.com/crysis-3-system-requirements/

It's okay to cry PC owners...this game will be the best on PS 2 and Xbox!!!

Crytek needs to mandate 1080p uncrappy compression for videos like these. Mostly impressed by the density, detail and animation of vegetation, and of course the top secret toad tech.McStrongfast

You seriously want 5GB videos? You have no idea what you're asking for.

It's okay to cry PC owners...this game will be the best on PS 2 and Xbox!!!

homeboylizard