Crytek,say taht Consoles shooters are at the level of PC shooter, 5-6 years ago

[QUOTE="hydrophoboe"]LMFAO! How can you consider Call of Duty 4 more sophisticated than Halo 3? What is this guy smoking?smokeydabear076

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="hydrophoboe"]LMFAO! How can you consider Call of Duty 4 more sophisticated than Halo 3? What is this guy smoking?Vandalvideo

[QUOTE="kevy619"]

You cant argue with a hermit, they're even more stubborn than a cow.

smokeydabear076

lol, SS2 is a sweet game. But just because Halo 3 doesnt have highly complex gameplay, doesnt mean it isnt one of the best games in the genre out there. I love run & gun style shooters.

I never said Halo 3 was more sophisticated than Call of Duty. Learn to read.hydrophoboe

[QUOTE="hydrophoboe"]LMFAO! How can you consider Call of Duty 4 more sophisticated than Halo 3? What is this guy smoking?smokeydabear076

[QUOTE="kevy619"]

You cant argue with a hermit, they're even more stubborn than a cow.

smokeydabear076

I never said Halo 3 was more sophisticated than Call of Duty. Learn to read.hydrophoboe

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="kevy619"]

You cant argue with a hermit, they're even more stubborn than a cow.

kevy619

lol, SS2 is a sweet game. But just because Halo 3 doesnt have highly complex gameplay, doesnt mean it isnt one of the best games in the genre out there. I love run & gun style shooters.

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="hydrophoboe"]LMFAO! How can you consider Call of Duty 4 more sophisticated than Halo 3? What is this guy smoking?smokeydabear076

lol, COD4 and Halo 3 are about equal to me. Although I prefer the map designs/weapons in Halo 3.

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="hydrophoboe"]LMFAO! How can you consider Call of Duty 4 more sophisticated than Halo 3? What is this guy smoking?kevy619

lol, COD4 and Halo 3 are about equal to me. Although I prefer the map designs/weapons in Halo 3.

halo 3 is for kids man, honestly, who likes to kill aliens with colors at a 760 resolution, lol not even hd,,,, i rather play acod4 tat shows people and uses real time weapons that we have today

[QUOTE="kevy619"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="kevy619"]

You cant argue with a hermit, they're even more stubborn than a cow.

smokeydabear076

lol, SS2 is a sweet game. But just because Halo 3 doesnt have highly complex gameplay, doesnt mean it isnt one of the best games in the genre out there. I love run & gun style shooters.

I think it more than holds its own against pc shooters when it comes to overall fun factor.

[QUOTE="kevy619"]

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="hydrophoboe"]LMFAO! How can you consider Call of Duty 4 more sophisticated than Halo 3? What is this guy smoking?paabss

lol, COD4 and Halo 3 are about equal to me. Although I prefer the map designs/weapons in Halo 3.

halo 3 is for kids man, honestly, who likes to kill aliens with colors at a 760 resolution, lol not even hd,,,, i rather play acod4 tat shows people and uses real time weapons that we have today

Sounds like something a 14 year-old would say.

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="kevy619"]

You cant argue with a hermit, they're even more stubborn than a cow.

Spartan070

I think it more than holds its own against pc shooters when it comes to overall fun factor.kevy619

lol, SS2 is a sweet game. But just because Halo 3 doesnt have highly complex gameplay, doesnt mean it isnt one of the best games in the genre out there. I love run & gun style shooters.

kevy619

Ihate to use another metaphor but "Rosebud"(Citizen Kane for the non film-buffs) is one of the greatest movies ever but I'd rather see V for Vendetta any day.

[QUOTE="hydrophoboe"]I never said Halo 3 was more sophisticated than Call of Duty. Learn to read.smokeydabear076

Generally, I'm unimpressed by Infinity Ward games. The game design is usually very narrow and repetitive. Half-Life 2, Bioshock, and Deus Ex are fine PC shooters, and are far more sophisticated than Call of Duty. But, at best, I think Halo 3 and Call of Duty 4 are equivalents in sophistication.

[QUOTE="kevy619"]I think it more than holds its own against pc shooters when it comes to overall fun factor.Vandalvideo

[QUOTE="kevy619"]

lol, SS2 is a sweet game. But just because Halo 3 doesnt have highly complex gameplay, doesnt mean it isnt one of the best games in the genre out there. I love run & gun style shooters.

Spartan070

Ihate to use another metaphor but "Rosebud"(Citizen Kane for the non film-buffs) is one of the greatest movies ever but I'd rather see V for Vendetta any day.

are you serous? if bioshock was only on 360, he wouldn't have said that, same w/ cod4.

i've had horrible experiences trying fps on my pc, i only play them on my consoles now.

that guy is very biased.

And this affects me how?. I'm having a great time with Halo 3, more so than any PC shooter I've played.

He's allowed his opinion but that's all it is, his opinion.

Nick-M40A3

Ya people need to realize this, especially Halo fanboys

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="kevy619"]I think it more than holds its own against pc shooters when it comes to overall fun factor.smokeydabear076

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="hydrophoboe"]I never said Halo 3 was more sophisticated than Call of Duty. Learn to read.hydrophoboe

Generally, I'm unimpressed by Infinity Ward games. The game design is usually very narrow and repetitive. Half-Life 2, Bioshock, and Deus Ex are fine PC shooters, and are far more sophisticated than Call of Duty. But, at best, I think Halo 3 and Call of Duty 4 are equivalents in sophistication.

Ya people need to realize this, especially Halo fanboysLonelynight

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="kevy619"]I think it more than holds its own against pc shooters when it comes to overall fun factor.Vandalvideo

Uuuuuugh. You need more Story of Adele Hugo. Those movies are soo.....ugh compared to that. My bestest movies evar: Jacob's Ladder, Lost highway (inspired Silent Hill 2), Story of Adele Hugo, and Trainspotting.Vandalvideo

Are those the ones in Serious Sam 2? I don't remember, its been a while.smokeydabear076

Crytek also claimed to be the collective Messiah, then they all ran around with their underwear on their heads in the studio parking lot. i'd link to it, but that link's aviolation of the ToS.Big_T-Mac

...It's not that it's not possible, but console shooters are at the level of PC shooters 5-6 years ago. The gameplay has to be more sophisticated - more thinking then shooting... paabss

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]Are those the ones in Serious Sam 2? I don't remember, its been a while.Vandalvideo

[QUOTE="Lonelynight"]Ya people need to realize this, especially Halo fanboyshydrophoboe

No, I mean that if we bad mouth Halo its like we insulted their mother

The funny thing is, is that Far Cry was the worst console shooter I've played in a looooooooong time. They should shut their collective pieholesRickGotti

The console version had a much better multiplayer compared to the PC version. It remains the worst multiplayer PC shooter I have ever played up to this day. It was garbage.

Looks at Resistance and Halo 3. Very true, didn't Halo 3 just get turrets and flying vehicles?

To me if a shooter comes out exclusively to the 360 it's years behind, and if it comes out multiplat it always plays much worse, and even so forcing developers to casualize their games for it.

[QUOTE="RickGotti"]The funny thing is, is that Far Cry was the worst console shooter I've played in a looooooooong time. They should shut their collective pieholesDeihmos

The console version had a much better multiplayer compared to the PC version. It remains the worst multiplayer PC shooter I have ever played up to this day. It was garbage.

The funny thing is, is that Far Cry was the worst console shooter I've played in a looooooooong time. They should shut their collective pieholesRickGotti

Crytek didn't develope Farcry for console (that was Ubisoft) only PC.

[QUOTE="RickGotti"]The funny thing is, is that Far Cry was the worst console shooter I've played in a looooooooong time. They should shut their collective pieholesDeihmos

The console version had a much better multiplayer compared to the PC version. It remains the worst multiplayer PC shooter I have ever played up to this day. It was garbage.

[QUOTE="Deihmos"]

[QUOTE="RickGotti"]The funny thing is, is that Far Cry was the worst console shooter I've played in a looooooooong time. They should shut their collective pieholesVandalvideo

The console version had a much better multiplayer compared to the PC version. It remains the worst multiplayer PC shooter I have ever played up to this day. It was garbage.

The multiplayer was great on the PC? You cannot be serious....It was awful. The multiplayer was fun on the xbox which made me buy the PC version. It was a massive disappointment.

The multiplayer was great on the PC? You cannot be serious....It was awful.Deihmos

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]It is official now.mingo123

whats official?

I'd like to know that too. :?

they're saying it,like if pc shooters evolved or something.

Crysis will scoe a perfect 10! mark my wordspaabss

The funny thing is, is that Far Cry was the worst console shooter I've played in a looooooooong time. They should shut their collective pieholesRickGotti

The funny thing is, the console Far Cry devs weren't Crytek; it was NUBIsoft. /you

Don't you guys see what hes doing? of course he is going to make claims like that, hes part of a team developing a pc shooter. I think its pathetic to say something like that when it is so obviously not true, console shooters are NOT 5-6 years behind. Its hard to look up to these devs that are really talented but make fanboyish comments like these.michael098

I'm not denying console shooters are behind, but 5-6 years?

[QUOTE="michael098"]Don't you guys see what hes doing? of course he is going to make claims like that, hes part of a team developing a pc shooter. I think its pathetic to say something like that when it is so obviously not true, console shooters are NOT 5-6 years behind. Its hard to look up to these devs that are really talented but make fanboyish comments like these.michael098

I'm not denying console shooters are behind, but 5-6 years?

[QUOTE="michael098"]Don't you guys see what hes doing? of course he is going to make claims like that, hes part of a team developing a pc shooter. I think its pathetic to say something like that when it is so obviously not true, console shooters are NOT 5-6 years behind. Its hard to look up to these devs that are really talented but make fanboyish comments like these.michael098

I'm not denying console shooters are behind, but 5-6 years?

[QUOTE="michael098"]

[QUOTE="michael098"]Don't you guys see what hes doing? of course he is going to make claims like that, hes part of a team developing a pc shooter. I think its pathetic to say something like that when it is so obviously not true, console shooters are NOT 5-6 years behind. Its hard to look up to these devs that are really talented but make fanboyish comments like these.smokeydabear076

I'm not denying console shooters are behind, but 5-6 years?

That's exactly what I was thinking... Maybe he took the post from someone else and neglected to copy their user-name....