Dear Sheep, Buy a Better TV

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#201 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

[QUOTE="super600"]

[QUOTE="locopatho"] Is the WiiU a next gen console, coming out 7 years after the 360? Yes, it is. Why are you happy with Nintendo barely matching last gen machines :?

ActionRemix

I really don't care about the specs of the console because I think they are decent.I only have a 720P tv.

Today we have confirmation from one of your standardbearers that he doesn't know what he's talking about. If you're going to insist that it's not a big deal if 720p 30fps is the standard output for Wii U games, you should experience 1080p 60fps before you deride it as a "slight improvement."

Here's a 40" 1080p TV for $350:

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Dynex%26%23153%3B---40%22-Class---LCD---1080p---60Hz---HDTV/2620821.p?skuId=2620821&productCategoryId=abcat0101001&id=1218340598798

While you're at it, ditch those composite cables for HDMI.

http://www.amazon.com/Mediabridge-Ultra-Ethernet-Certified-Available/dp/B0019EHU8G/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1343237050&sr=1-1

I shudder to think that some of you are Wii-only and game at 480i.

P.S. Some of you should get some f-ckin' glasses!

http://www.lenscrafters.com/

You're linking to a Dynex tv? Honest truth here--I'd rather play wii at it's lower resolution on a nice 1920x1080 tv, than play a pc game in 1920x1080@60fps on a Dynex. Also, do they even produce interlaced sets anymore?
Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#202 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]

[QUOTE="super600"]

I really don't care about the specs of the console because I think they are decent.I only have a 720P tv.

Heirren

Today we have confirmation from one of your standardbearers that he doesn't know what he's talking about. If you're going to insist that it's not a big deal if 720p 30fps is the standard output for Wii U games, you should experience 1080p 60fps before you deride it as a "slight improvement."

Here's a 40" 1080p TV for $350:

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Dynex%26%23153%3B---40%22-Class---LCD---1080p---60Hz---HDTV/2620821.p?skuId=2620821&productCategoryId=abcat0101001&id=1218340598798

While you're at it, ditch those composite cables for HDMI.

http://www.amazon.com/Mediabridge-Ultra-Ethernet-Certified-Available/dp/B0019EHU8G/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1343237050&sr=1-1

I shudder to think that some of you are Wii-only and game at 480i.

P.S. Some of you should get some f-ckin' glasses!

http://www.lenscrafters.com/

You're linking to a Dynex tv? Honest truth here--I'd rather play wii at it's lower resolution on a nice 1920x1080 tv, than play a pc game in 1920x1080@60fps on a Dynex. Also, do they even produce interlaced sets anymore?

I can't expect sheep to pay much for a TV when they insist graphics don't matter. Dynex is a good budget brand.

Avatar image for AtariKidX
AtariKidX

7166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#203 AtariKidX
Member since 2010 • 7166 Posts
Sheep they don't even know what is a PS3/XBOX360......lol In the NintendoDreamLand there is only the Wii and SDTVs.
Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#204 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

[QUOTE="Heirren"][QUOTE="ActionRemix"]

Today we have confirmation from one of your standardbearers that he doesn't know what he's talking about. If you're going to insist that it's not a big deal if 720p 30fps is the standard output for Wii U games, you should experience 1080p 60fps before you deride it as a "slight improvement."

Here's a 40" 1080p TV for $350:

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Dynex%26%23153%3B---40%22-Class---LCD---1080p---60Hz---HDTV/2620821.p?skuId=2620821&productCategoryId=abcat0101001&id=1218340598798

While you're at it, ditch those composite cables for HDMI.

http://www.amazon.com/Mediabridge-Ultra-Ethernet-Certified-Available/dp/B0019EHU8G/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1343237050&sr=1-1

I shudder to think that some of you are Wii-only and game at 480i.

P.S. Some of you should get some f-ckin' glasses!

http://www.lenscrafters.com/

ActionRemix

You're linking to a Dynex tv? Honest truth here--I'd rather play wii at it's lower resolution on a nice 1920x1080 tv, than play a pc game in 1920x1080@60fps on a Dynex. Also, do they even produce interlaced sets anymore?

I can't expect sheep to pay much for a TV when they insist graphics don't matter. Dynex is a good budget brand.

I'm no fanboy, but I think wii is home to the best games this gen. It could benefit from a higher resolution, but the games still look good on a nice tv. Dynex is not a good brand, sorry.
Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#205 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

[QUOTE="Heirren"][QUOTE="ActionRemix"]

Today we have confirmation from one of your standardbearers that he doesn't know what he's talking about. If you're going to insist that it's not a big deal if 720p 30fps is the standard output for Wii U games, you should experience 1080p 60fps before you deride it as a "slight improvement."

Here's a 40" 1080p TV for $350:

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Dynex%26%23153%3B---40%22-Class---LCD---1080p---60Hz---HDTV/2620821.p?skuId=2620821&productCategoryId=abcat0101001&id=1218340598798

While you're at it, ditch those composite cables for HDMI.

http://www.amazon.com/Mediabridge-Ultra-Ethernet-Certified-Available/dp/B0019EHU8G/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1343237050&sr=1-1

I shudder to think that some of you are Wii-only and game at 480i.

P.S. Some of you should get some f-ckin' glasses!

http://www.lenscrafters.com/

ActionRemix

You're linking to a Dynex tv? Honest truth here--I'd rather play wii at it's lower resolution on a nice 1920x1080 tv, than play a pc game in 1920x1080@60fps on a Dynex. Also, do they even produce interlaced sets anymore?

I can't expect sheep to pay much for a TV when they insist graphics don't matter. Dynex is a good budget brand.

again with the graphics dont matter argument, i see people proclaiming they say it then the sheep that actually say it. then when i ask them to show me what sheep they cant show me anybody

Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#206 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]

[QUOTE="Heirren"] You're linking to a Dynex tv? Honest truth here--I'd rather play wii at it's lower resolution on a nice 1920x1080 tv, than play a pc game in 1920x1080@60fps on a Dynex. Also, do they even produce interlaced sets anymore? Mario1331

I can't expect sheep to pay much for a TV when they insist graphics don't matter. Dynex is a good budget brand.

again with the graphics dont matter argument, i see people proclaiming they say it then the sheep that actually say it. then when i ask them to show me what sheep they cant show me anybody

Exhibit A: super600p

Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#207 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

[QUOTE="locopatho"] How many times does it need to be said... The WiiU is NEXT GEN. Doing what LAST GEN consoles do isn't enough.ActionRemix

thats the thing it is doing it better with mandatory 720 and 1080p. its a moderate boost nothing life changing though.

wiiu games look good whoever think console gaming will look like the samaritan or illuminous engine is going to be greatly disappointed

If the Wii U were a capable machine, it could save resources by dropping the res and output graphics at 720p that blow away what my budget PC outputs at 1080p. But looking at Batman Arkham City, it's clearly outputs current gen graphics at 720p.

or maybe its a lousy port

Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#208 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]I can't expect sheep to pay much for a TV when they insist graphics don't matter. Dynex is a good budget brand.

ActionRemix

again with the graphics dont matter argument, i see people proclaiming they say it then the sheep that actually say it. then when i ask them to show me what sheep they cant show me anybody

Exhibit A: super600p

i want to see where he posted it,

Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#209 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

thats the thing it is doing it better with mandatory 720 and 1080p. its a moderate boost nothing life changing though.

wiiu games look good whoever think console gaming will look like the samaritan or illuminous engine is going to be greatly disappointed

Mario1331

If the Wii U were a capable machine, it could save resources by dropping the res and output graphics at 720p that blow away what my budget PC outputs at 1080p. But looking at Batman Arkham City, it's clearly outputs current gen graphics at 720p.

or maybe its a lousy port

The first party games look terrible too.

Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#210 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

again with the graphics dont matter argument, i see people proclaiming they say it then the sheep that actually say it. then when i ask them to show me what sheep they cant show me anybody

Mario1331

Exhibit A: super600p

i want to see where he posted it,

Everywhere on this damn forum. Just read the OP. He thinks 2006 technology is good enough for next gen.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#211 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42199 Posts
Thread is bad and you should feel bad.
Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#212 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]Exhibit A: super600p

ActionRemix

i want to see where he posted it,

Everywhere on this damn forum. Just read the OP. He thinks 2006 technology is good enough for next gen.

did he say GRAPHICS dont matter though? he didnt which proves my point

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#214 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52546 Posts

Those cables are sh!t.

I tried playing Wii games on a HDTV. Looked horrible. Brother comes along saying I need those component cables. It's still horrible.
I just play them on a SDTV.

Avatar image for super600
super600

33158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#215 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33158 Posts

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]Exhibit A: super600p

ActionRemix

i want to see where he posted it,

Everywhere on this damn forum. Just read the OP. He thinks 2006 technology is good enough for next gen.

I didn't say graphics didn't matter idiot.I like games to look decent and to have good gameplay, but I don't like to much of a focus on graphics because it will increase development costs at times.You're a graphics whore TC.

Avatar image for mariokart64fan
mariokart64fan

20828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 101

User Lists: 1

#216 mariokart64fan
Member since 2003 • 20828 Posts

dear cows and lems tell ms and sony to make a better console then the super nintendo until they can match that game library - you can just Stop posting stupid threads cause you and me know that the only other console that plays snes games is the wii ,

and wii has its own awsome library of games forget about the tv its about the games and it seams sony has had its way killing franchises like top gear-see top gear dare devil ps2, timesplitters by virtue of hazes failure , and how ms killed rare , ya thats right ,

you see every time nintendo is doing good you guys wanna try to bring them down to your standards - those standards being 75 percent first person shooters that are cod wanna bes , 25 percent open world gta clones and your yrly madden game no thanks i think nintendos fine dancing to the beat of its own drum ,,

now if you excuse me i have top gear 3000 right now , and did i mention top gear is alot better then gran turismo 5!

Avatar image for penpusher
penpusher

3573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#217 penpusher
Member since 2004 • 3573 Posts

Oh dear. Forgive me for not being hip but top of the line HD graphics arent everything. As long as the games are awesome I couldnt care less if it were 1080p or 480p ... people are to obsessed with this HD stuff.

Avatar image for super600
super600

33158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#218 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33158 Posts

Oh dear. Forgive me for sounding like a tired old retro gamer but top of the line HD graphics arent everything. As long as the games are awesome I couldnt care less if it were 1080p or 480p ... people are to obsessed with this HD stuff.penpusher

True.

Avatar image for trugs26
trugs26

7541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#219 trugs26
Member since 2004 • 7541 Posts

I shudder to think that some of you are Wii-only and game at 480i.

ActionRemix



I enjoy playing the games, get over it.

Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#221 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

i want to see where he posted it,

super600

Everywhere on this damn forum. Just read the OP. He thinks 2006 technology is good enough for next gen.

I didn't say graphics didn't matter idiot.I like games to look decent and to have good gameplay, but I don't like to much of a focus on graphics because it will increase development costs at times.You're a graphics whore TC.

They clearly didn't put any more development time in NSMBU than NSMB Wii.

Avatar image for ultraking
ultraking

6904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#222 ultraking
Member since 2004 • 6904 Posts
[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]

[QUOTE="Heirren"] You're linking to a Dynex tv? Honest truth here--I'd rather play wii at it's lower resolution on a nice 1920x1080 tv, than play a pc game in 1920x1080@60fps on a Dynex. Also, do they even produce interlaced sets anymore? Heirren

I can't expect sheep to pay much for a TV when they insist graphics don't matter. Dynex is a good budget brand.

I'm no fanboy, but I think wii is home to the best games this gen. It could benefit from a higher resolution, but the games still look good on a nice tv. Dynex is not a good brand, sorry.

I have a 40 inch dynex 1080p set that I bought before my 3d set. And it looks amazing. Tbh there's not much deference between my sony 3d and dynex set. Well aside from the 3d
Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#223 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

[QUOTE="Heirren"][QUOTE="ActionRemix"]I can't expect sheep to pay much for a TV when they insist graphics don't matter. Dynex is a good budget brand.

ultraking

I'm no fanboy, but I think wii is home to the best games this gen. It could benefit from a higher resolution, but the games still look good on a nice tv. Dynex is not a good brand, sorry.

I have a 40 inch dynex 1080p set that I bought before my 3d set. And it looks amazing. Tbh there's not much deference between my sony 3d and dynex set. Well aside from the 3d

I've seen the image quality of Dynex HDTVs side by side with other brands at Best Buy. They do look good. That's why I decided to buy a 24" one for my PC instead of a dedicated PC monitor. Both PC and console games looked good on it.

Avatar image for themagicbum9720
themagicbum9720

6536

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#224 themagicbum9720
Member since 2007 • 6536 Posts

i already own a 42 inch panasonic plasma that does 1080p. i bought it when it was on sale last christmas from newegg. 300 dollars off. cost only 530. have the bluray player that matches it and hdmi cables obviously.

2560x1440 is spoiling me, 1080p is nothing special.

Avatar image for Michael0134567
Michael0134567

28651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#225 Michael0134567
Member since 2008 • 28651 Posts

The idiots in this thread.Oh my.

Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#226 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts

[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="Mario1331"]

who said it doesnt matter? all ive seen was people said there fine without it. Games dont go 720p or 1080p NOW so if the wiiu is its fine with them. some people are just fine with how games look now and i feel the opposite are being the ignorant ones.

Mario1331

How many times does it need to be said... The WiiU is NEXT GEN. Doing what LAST GEN consoles do isn't enough.

thats the thing it is doing it better with mandatory 720 and 1080p. its a moderate boost nothing life changing though.

wiiu games look good whoever think console gaming will look like the samaritan or illuminous engine is going to be greatly disappointed

In 2012, 1080p is not a difficult thing to do. WiiU certainly doesn't seem to be doing much, I'm thinking PS4 at least will be brutalise it...
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#227 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts

[QUOTE="penpusher"]Oh dear. Forgive me for sounding like a tired old retro gamer but top of the line HD graphics arent everything. As long as the games are awesome I couldnt care less if it were 1080p or 480p ... people are to obsessed with this HD stuff.super600

True.

They shouldn't have killed off the Wii, and kept supporting it. You can't have it both ways... you can't say graphics/power don't matter, then go mad over a new console announcement...
Avatar image for m_machine024
m_machine024

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#228 m_machine024
Member since 2006 • 15874 Posts

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

[QUOTE="locopatho"] Agree 100%locopatho

who said it doesnt matter? all ive seen was people said there fine without it. Games dont go 720p or 1080p NOW so if the wiiu is its fine with them. some people are just fine with how games look now and i feel the opposite are being the ignorant ones.

How many times does it need to be said... The WiiU is NEXT GEN. Doing what LAST GEN consoles do isn't enough.

It seems that you keep forgetting that the WiiU is all about the controller. It's unusual compared to past gens before the Wii but that's how it is. Also I don't think that its hardware will get in the way of developpers like the Wii did.

Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#229 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts

[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="Mario1331"]

who said it doesnt matter? all ive seen was people said there fine without it. Games dont go 720p or 1080p NOW so if the wiiu is its fine with them. some people are just fine with how games look now and i feel the opposite are being the ignorant ones.

m_machine024

How many times does it need to be said... The WiiU is NEXT GEN. Doing what LAST GEN consoles do isn't enough.

It seems that you keep forgetting that the WiiU is all about the controller. It's unusual compared to past gens before the Wii but that's how it is. Also I don't think that its hardware will get in the way of developpers like the Wii did.

It's like a Nintendo DS. Whoopee. How is it different from that? Sure, analog sticks, but the biggest difference is the power of the console. Wii U offers much different gameplay experiences than the DS could simply because it's more powerful. Unfortunately, PS4/720 will likely be able to do a lot more than Wii U

Will the hardware get in the way of devs? YES. 1.5 GB is not nearly enough RAM. Devs will have to spend a lot of resources on optimization if they want to port PS4/720 games to Wii U. More likely they'll just leave the Wii U out entirely.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#230 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts
Unfortunately, PS4/720 will likely be able to do a lot more than Wii U

Will the hardware get in the way of devs? YES. 1.5 GB is not nearly enough RAM. Devs will have to spend a lot of resources on optimization if they want to port PS4/720 games to Wii U. More likely they'll just leave the Wii U out entirely.

ActionRemix
Give some examples, then. See, the way I'm seeing is that unless ms/Sony follow suit with the tablet controller(which they likely will) , it is the wiiu that will be able to do things the others can't.
Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#231 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"] Unfortunately, PS4/720 will likely be able to do a lot more than Wii U

Will the hardware get in the way of devs? YES. 1.5 GB is not nearly enough RAM. Devs will have to spend a lot of resources on optimization if they want to port PS4/720 games to Wii U. More likely they'll just leave the Wii U out entirely.

Heirren

Give some examples, then. See, the way I'm seeing is that unless ms/Sony follow suit with the tablet controller(which they likely will) , it is the wiiu that will be able to do things the others can't.

The Witness might not come to Wii U because it has so little RAM. Jon Blow is only planning for a PC release until competent next-gen consoles come out.

Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#232 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

[QUOTE="locopatho"] How many times does it need to be said... The WiiU is NEXT GEN. Doing what LAST GEN consoles do isn't enough.locopatho

thats the thing it is doing it better with mandatory 720 and 1080p. its a moderate boost nothing life changing though.

wiiu games look good whoever think console gaming will look like the samaritan or illuminous engine is going to be greatly disappointed

In 2012, 1080p is not a difficult thing to do. WiiU certainly doesn't seem to be doing much, I'm thinking PS4 at least will be brutalise it...

the wiiu is also streaming a tablet. i doubt if the ps4/720 are streaming tablets they will be around the same, nothing less then 720p most games at 1080

Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#233 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

[QUOTE="super600"]

[QUOTE="penpusher"]Oh dear. Forgive me for sounding like a tired old retro gamer but top of the line HD graphics arent everything. As long as the games are awesome I couldnt care less if it were 1080p or 480p ... people are to obsessed with this HD stuff.locopatho

True.

They shouldn't have killed off the Wii, and kept supporting it. You can't have it both ways... you can't say graphics/power don't matter, then go mad over a new console announcement...

nobody said this

Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#234 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts

[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="super600"]

True.

Mario1331

They shouldn't have killed off the Wii, and kept supporting it. You can't have it both ways... you can't say graphics/power don't matter, then go mad over a new console announcement...

nobody said this

You know that's bullsh-t.super600p has clearly stated that he's satisfied with 2005-level graphics. Sheep insist in every graphics thread that "art style" is this magic force that supercedes technological barriers of decade-old technology.

Avatar image for m_machine024
m_machine024

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#235 m_machine024
Member since 2006 • 15874 Posts

[QUOTE="m_machine024"]

[QUOTE="locopatho"] How many times does it need to be said... The WiiU is NEXT GEN. Doing what LAST GEN consoles do isn't enough.ActionRemix

It seems that you keep forgetting that the WiiU is all about the controller. It's unusual compared to past gens before the Wii but that's how it is. Also I don't think that its hardware will get in the way of developpers like the Wii did.

It's like a Nintendo DS. Whoopee. How is it different from that? Sure, analog sticks, but the biggest difference is the power of the console. Wii U offers much different gameplay experiences than the DS could simply because it's more powerful. Unfortunately, PS4/720 will likely be able to do a lot more than Wii U

Will the hardware get in the way of devs? YES. 1.5 GB is not nearly enough RAM. Devs will have to spend a lot of resources on optimization if they want to port PS4/720 games to Wii U. More likely they'll just leave the Wii U out entirely.

The gamepad does have a IR pointer and gyro tho. And could combine thoses with the screen for different gameplay possibilities. Now I'm not saying it's gonna bring better gameplay than more hardware power but just different. It makes devs think concepts they wouldn't have thought before, ya know.

I'm not getting a WiiU to play the multiplats on it simply because they will use the screen. Not at all (well maybe some in the future, who knows :P). Even if it's full of ports already. >_> PS4/720 should be sharing their multiplats and WiiU will have its own different gamepads exclusives concepts. And hopefully this time, the hardware won't get in the way of the different concepts devs bring. The Wii is a bit too weak. That's what I meant earlier. Wasn't talking about the multiplats.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#236 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

[QUOTE="locopatho"] They shouldn't have killed off the Wii, and kept supporting it. You can't have it both ways... you can't say graphics/power don't matter, then go mad over a new console announcement...ActionRemix

nobody said this

You know that's bullsh-t.super600p has clearly stated that he's satisfied with 2005-level graphics. Sheep insist in every graphics thread that "art style" is this magic force that supercedes technological barriers of decade-old technology.

You're generalizing, but the statement is correct. There are properly made Genesis and SNES games that look better than some 360/PS3 games.
Avatar image for m_machine024
m_machine024

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#237 m_machine024
Member since 2006 • 15874 Posts

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

[QUOTE="locopatho"] They shouldn't have killed off the Wii, and kept supporting it. You can't have it both ways... you can't say graphics/power don't matter, then go mad over a new console announcement...ActionRemix

nobody said this

You know that's bullsh-t.super600p has clearly stated that he's satisfied with 2005-level graphics. Sheep insist in every graphics thread that "art style" is this magic force that supercedes technological barriers of decade-old technology.

Tbh with you, I don't think the leap next gen is gonna be huge like past gens, gameplay wise anyway. There's a reason why Sony and MS didn't even announce their next consoles yet. I don't mind if I will be proven wrong tho. :P

Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#238 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

nobody said this

Heirren

You know that's bullsh-t.super600p has clearly stated that he's satisfied with 2005-level graphics. Sheep insist in every graphics thread that "art style" is this magic force that supercedes technological barriers of decade-old technology.

You're generalizing, but the statement is correct. There are properly made Genesis and SNES games that look better than some 360/PS3 games.

Maybe if you're playing the SNES games on PC and the 360 games on a standard dev TV. SNES resolution was less than 240i, 2 times worse than Youtube circa 2006. 240i looks really, really bad.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#239 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

[QUOTE="Heirren"][QUOTE="ActionRemix"]You know that's bullsh-t.super600p has clearly stated that he's satisfied with 2005-level graphics. Sheep insist in every graphics thread that "art style" is this magic force that supercedes technological barriers of decade-old technology.

ActionRemix

You're generalizing, but the statement is correct. There are properly made Genesis and SNES games that look better than some 360/PS3 games.

Maybe if you're playing the SNES games on PC and the 360 games on a standard dev TV. SNES resolution was less than 240i, 2 times worse than Youtube circa 2006. 240i is really, really bad.

Good game graphics is more about properly utilizing the visual assets that are available.
Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#240 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]

[QUOTE="Heirren"] You're generalizing, but the statement is correct. There are properly made Genesis and SNES games that look better than some 360/PS3 games.Heirren

Maybe if you're playing the SNES games on PC and the 360 games on a standard dev TV. SNES resolution was less than 240i, 2 times worse than Youtube circa 2006. 240i is really, really bad.

Good game graphics is more about properly utilizing the visual assets that are available.

Good game graphics?

Super_Mario_World_Calculator_by_XMegaGod

It pushes the TI 89 to the max.

Avatar image for aroxx_ab
aroxx_ab

13236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#241 aroxx_ab
Member since 2005 • 13236 Posts

Wii games look better with SDtv, big HDtv make the games look just even worse

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#242 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

[QUOTE="Heirren"][QUOTE="ActionRemix"]Maybe if you're playing the SNES games on PC and the 360 games on a standard dev TV. SNES resolution was less than 240i, 2 times worse than Youtube circa 2006. 240i is really, really bad.

ActionRemix

Good game graphics is more about properly utilizing the visual assets that are available.

Good game graphics?

Super_Mario_World_Calculator_by_XMegaGod

It pushes the TI 89 to the max.

Are you not understanding?
Avatar image for darkdude2k12
darkdude2k12

874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#243 darkdude2k12
Member since 2011 • 874 Posts

[QUOTE="dRuGGeRnaUt"]Question for the Sheeples: If back when the SNES launched and competed with the Sega Genesis, if it had had the same graphics as the NES, do you think they would've been able to make the games they did?? Would you sit and say that it didn't matter then? Did graphics/power change gaming with the SNES vs the NES?? anyone that says "no" is in complete denial. Each step in tech they took, opened up more and more possibilities. =-=-= Seriously though, most of you sheep must not have been around. Did you guys also complain that when N64 came out, the extra graphics weren't important? What if N64 stayed minorly more powerful than a genesis and launched against the PS1?? what would you say then? It's all a f***ing joke. If graphics aren't important, why have consoles evolved at all? You don't need to bash graphics if you don't care, but please dont be ignorant and say they dont matter.goblaa

Well, considering that NES games are way more fun the genisis games on the whole, and considering that the NES sold way more than the SNES ever did, if nintendo had just remade the nes, it prolly would have still out sold the genisis and had more content to boot. Especially if the nes came with a controller that changed the way we play games, opening up many more gameplay oppertunites..

THough, I would miss the SNES...

There's no way you're serious about this statement whatsoever.

Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#244 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts

[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="Mario1331"]

who said it doesnt matter? all ive seen was people said there fine without it. Games dont go 720p or 1080p NOW so if the wiiu is its fine with them. some people are just fine with how games look now and i feel the opposite are being the ignorant ones.

m_machine024

How many times does it need to be said... The WiiU is NEXT GEN. Doing what LAST GEN consoles do isn't enough.

It seems that you keep forgetting that the WiiU is all about the controller. It's unusual compared to past gens before the Wii but that's how it is. Also I don't think that its hardware will get in the way of developpers like the Wii did.

I do know the focus is on it's controller. I'm not expecting a generation leap in graphics. Just a bump in resolution and fps.
Avatar image for YoshiYogurt
YoshiYogurt

6008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#245 YoshiYogurt
Member since 2010 • 6008 Posts

[QUOTE="goblaa"]

[QUOTE="dRuGGeRnaUt"]Question for the Sheeples: If back when the SNES launched and competed with the Sega Genesis, if it had had the same graphics as the NES, do you think they would've been able to make the games they did?? Would you sit and say that it didn't matter then? Did graphics/power change gaming with the SNES vs the NES?? anyone that says "no" is in complete denial. Each step in tech they took, opened up more and more possibilities. =-=-= Seriously though, most of you sheep must not have been around. Did you guys also complain that when N64 came out, the extra graphics weren't important? What if N64 stayed minorly more powerful than a genesis and launched against the PS1?? what would you say then? It's all a f***ing joke. If graphics aren't important, why have consoles evolved at all? You don't need to bash graphics if you don't care, but please dont be ignorant and say they dont matter.darkdude2k12

Well, considering that NES games are way more fun the genisis games on the whole, and considering that the NES sold way more than the SNES ever did, if nintendo had just remade the nes, it prolly would have still out sold the genisis and had more content to boot. Especially if the nes came with a controller that changed the way we play games, opening up many more gameplay oppertunites..

THough, I would miss the SNES...

There's no way you're serious about this statement whatsoever.

The NES had better games. It's quite embarrassing when you can't even save in a 16 bit game *coughsonic cough*
Avatar image for bobcheeseball
bobcheeseball

9315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#246 bobcheeseball
Member since 2007 • 9315 Posts
There is truth to the statement Wii games look like complete sh!t (or at least even more so) on HD TV's. Still though, at this point its really hard to downgrade from HD and I'm not a graphics whore or anything.
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#247 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts

[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="super600"]

True.

Mario1331

They shouldn't have killed off the Wii, and kept supporting it. You can't have it both ways... you can't say graphics/power don't matter, then go mad over a new console announcement...

nobody said this

Every Sheep says this over and over again whenever the Wii or WiiU is proven to be beaten by the competition in some way. When they have strengths, they are praised. When they have weaknesses, they are ignored or excused. If Nintendo had come out and said "Every WiiU game will be 1080p, guaranteed :)" then sheep would be crowing from the rooftops about it :|
Avatar image for darkdude2k12
darkdude2k12

874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#248 darkdude2k12
Member since 2011 • 874 Posts

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

i want to see where he posted it,

super600

Everywhere on this damn forum. Just read the OP. He thinks 2006 technology is good enough for next gen.

I didn't say graphics didn't matter idiot.I like games to look decent and to have good gameplay, but I don't like to much of a focus on graphics because it will increase development costs at times.You're a graphics whore TC.

But you DID say they don't matter. This is because Nintendo HAS NOT treated Sheep to good graphics. Therefore, you wouldn't know exactly what "good graphics" do for gameplay at all. Yes. Every game has it's share of mechanics, but the graphics determine the flow of the game, it enhances the experience, and it's nice to see progression. I'm a gamer, but there's no way I'd go back playing consoles like the N64 or the PS1 being that "bad graphics" equals an "outdated experience". Especially not bad 3D games. 2D always gets a pass because it will always look intact. Graphics do matter.
Avatar image for bobcheeseball
bobcheeseball

9315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#249 bobcheeseball
Member since 2007 • 9315 Posts
[QUOTE="super600"]

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]Everywhere on this damn forum. Just read the OP. He thinks 2006 technology is good enough for next gen.

darkdude2k12

I didn't say graphics didn't matter idiot.I like games to look decent and to have good gameplay, but I don't like to much of a focus on graphics because it will increase development costs at times.You're a graphics whore TC.

But you DID say they don't matter. This is because Nintendo HAS NOT treated Sheep to good graphics. Therefore, you wouldn't know exactly what "good graphics" do for gameplay at all. Yes. Every game has it's share of mechanics, but the graphics determine the flow of the game, it enhances the experience, and it's nice to see progression. I'm a gamer, but there's no way I'd go back playing consoles like the N64 or the PS1 being that "bad graphics" equals an "outdated experience". Especially not bad 3D games. 2D always gets a pass because it will always look intact. Graphics do matter.

That would apply assuming he's never played a game outside of the Wii in his life... Especially considering his raptr thingy has him playing the Witcher 2...
Avatar image for darkdude2k12
darkdude2k12

874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#250 darkdude2k12
Member since 2011 • 874 Posts

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

[QUOTE="locopatho"] They shouldn't have killed off the Wii, and kept supporting it. You can't have it both ways... you can't say graphics/power don't matter, then go mad over a new console announcement...locopatho

nobody said this

Every Sheep says this over and over again whenever the Wii or WiiU is proven to be beaten by the competition in some way. When they have strengths, they are praised. When they have weaknesses, they are ignored or excused. If Nintendo had come out and said "Every WiiU game will be 1080p, guaranteed :)" then sheep would be crowing from the rooftops about it :|

Of course they will.

Afterall, HD is now ok because the Wii-U is an HD console.

Unfortunately, the Wii-U's 720p max.