It started this gen in 1st place (lems count it when other systems arent out yet), to 2nd, to last.
What was its biggest mistake?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
It started this gen in 1st place (lems count it when other systems arent out yet), to 2nd, to last.
What was its biggest mistake?
Idk man, I think around 2008 they went full casual and stopped supporting the system with games and that was their downfall. They became a multiplat/Kinectbox.
They lost SOOOOOOOOOOO much marketshare, while Sony started from scratch with 0 marketshare and just kept gaining marketshare, the 360 started this gen with 100% marketshare and managed to end this generation with the least amount of marketshare.
Gotta feel for M$ in these harsh times :(
i'd say, spending money for timed exclusives instead of new ip's
Plus the xbox brand is the weakest out of the big 3, so that has alot to do with it
MS went fom an afterthought last gen with over 4 billion in losses to more than tripling their install base and profitability. You won't hear them complaining. santoronstill loses to PS1 in that category, it came out with a bang. xbox sucking doesnt make 360 better.
Not creating enough blind faithful idiots that have nothing better to do then have multiple accounts just to create Troll topics on random Internet Video Game forums.....
[QUOTE="kuraimen"]No games, ridiculous failure rate and ripping people off.rilpasdoesn't it have roughly the same number of quality games as the PS3 according to both Gamespot and metacritic? Most of those games released the first year with no competition or are just rehashes.
cow logic = more than doubling market share and consistent success is failing...
losing more than half markt share and being in last place = good...
id give him through the holidays before his ban... terrible trolls always get squashed... its only a matter of time
lmfaoThey shouldn't have put the RRoD in the 360, even though it boosted their sales a bit ...
KiZZo1
[QUOTE="rilpas"][QUOTE="kuraimen"]No games, ridiculous failure rate and ripping people off.kuraimendoesn't it have roughly the same number of quality games as the PS3 according to both Gamespot and metacritic? Most of those games released the first year with no competition or are just rehashes.
doesn't the same apply to the PS3? how many MBLs, Buzz games and PS2 re-releases does it have?
Most of those games released the first year with no competition or are just rehashes.[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="rilpas"] doesn't it have roughly the same number of quality games as the PS3 according to both Gamespot and metacritic?rilpas
doesn't the same apply to the PS3? how many MBLs, Buzz games and PS2 re-releases does it have?
Youre discussing logic with a guy who literally cried when fable the journey scored AAE.... good luck.Most of those games released the first year with no competition or are just rehashes.[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="rilpas"] doesn't it have roughly the same number of quality games as the PS3 according to both Gamespot and metacritic?rilpas
doesn't the same apply to the PS3? how many MBLs, Buzz games and PS2 re-releases does it have?
Well the PS3 has rehashes too but at least has much more variety in first party IPs. Besides the "no games" phrase refers o the 360 now lacking first party support which was the same way lems used the phrase to make fun of the PS3 at the start of this gen even though it had games.It failed on reability and first party studios.
That said, unlike the general expectation, a few years ago, it ended up the gen with the best library, some of the best console graphics and more sales that the previous MS console. If that's not success, i don't get what would be.
Hold on, I may have gotten confused somewhere.
no you got it. 1. the high launch price was actually covered by tricking people into buying the wireless adaptor and HD separate, along with RROD. 2. Still doesnt have the games on a consistent basis 3. Reported major losses in revenue just last week or two weeks ago actually 4. Too many hacking reports for the 360 to really care.no you got it. 1. the high launch price was actually covered by tricking people into buying the wireless adaptor and HD separate, along with RROD. 2. Still doesnt have the games on a consistent basis 3. Reported major losses in revenue just last week or two weeks ago actually 4. Too many hacking reports for the 360 to really care.PressXtoJump
That was a terrible spin on your part :(
360 was the console that lost over half its marketshare and had its online hacked for 3 months. Oh wait...
[QUOTE="rilpas"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Most of those games released the first year with no competition or are just rehashes.kuraimen
doesn't the same apply to the PS3? how many MBLs, Buzz games and PS2 re-releases does it have?
Well the PS3 has rehashes too but at least has much more variety in first party IPs. Besides the "no games" phrase refers o the 360 now lacking first party support which was the same way lems used the phrase to make fun of the PS3 at the start of this gen even though it had games.Neither justifies the other, when both accounts of "no games" is objectively wrong.
Well the PS3 has rehashes too but at least has much more variety in first party IPs. Besides the "no games" phrase refers o the 360 now lacking first party support which was the same way lems used the phrase to make fun of the PS3 at the start of this gen even though it had games.[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="rilpas"]
doesn't the same apply to the PS3? how many MBLs, Buzz games and PS2 re-releases does it have?
AdobeArtist
Neither justifies the other, when both accounts of "no games" is objectively wrong.
Why are you trying to reason with one of the biggest trolls on system wars?[QUOTE="rilpas"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Most of those games released the first year with no competition or are just rehashes.kuraimen
doesn't the same apply to the PS3? how many MBLs, Buzz games and PS2 re-releases does it have?
Well the PS3 has rehashes too but at least has much more variety in first party IPs. Besides the "no games" phrase refers o the 360 now lacking first party support which was the same way lems used the phrase to make fun of the PS3 at the start of this gen even though it had games.as long as it has games and exclusives, which it does and in a similar ammount to the PS3, why should it matter?
Well the PS3 has rehashes too but at least has much more variety in first party IPs. Besides the "no games" phrase refers o the 360 now lacking first party support which was the same way lems used the phrase to make fun of the PS3 at the start of this gen even though it had games.[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="rilpas"]
doesn't the same apply to the PS3? how many MBLs, Buzz games and PS2 re-releases does it have?
AdobeArtist
Neither justifies the other, when both accounts of "no games" is objectively wrong.
Well lems had their fun back then, now it's our turn.[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Well the PS3 has rehashes too but at least has much more variety in first party IPs. Besides the "no games" phrase refers o the 360 now lacking first party support which was the same way lems used the phrase to make fun of the PS3 at the start of this gen even though it had games.kuraimen
Neither justifies the other, when both accounts of "no games" is objectively wrong.
Well lems had their fun back then, now it's our turn.Two wrongs make a right?
[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Well the PS3 has rehashes too but at least has much more variety in first party IPs. Besides the "no games" phrase refers o the 360 now lacking first party support which was the same way lems used the phrase to make fun of the PS3 at the start of this gen even though it had games.kuraimen
Neither justifies the other, when both accounts of "no games" is objectively wrong.
Well lems had their fun back then, now it's our turn.How can you have fun in last place with no games? :lol:
Well lems had their fun back then, now it's our turn.[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]
Neither justifies the other, when both accounts of "no games" is objectively wrong.
AdobeArtist
Two wrongs make a right?
No but they bring the lulz and that's why we are here for.Well lems had their fun back then, now it's our turn.[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]
Neither justifies the other, when both accounts of "no games" is objectively wrong.
JohnnyCageMK
How can you have fun in last place with no games? :lol:
You're really not helping :roll:
You're being just as moronic as kuraimen and the other obsessive cows (and yeah, the lemmings aren't alone with just JohnnyCageMK either)
I guess it was the lack of games since 2007. 360 had two strong years and an O.K. launch. 2008 onwards has been god awful exclusive wise.
Their biggest mistake was relying on third parties for exclusive games, it seemed like it was going to pay off at the start of the gen but look at how many exclusives the 360 has lost to ps3 and pc. They should have invested their money more wisely like Sony.G-O-M-JFirstly, 360 just got the highest rated FPS and Driver this year plus, keep these words in mind when talking about investing wisely...
Sony shares nearing junk bond status :o That is all. :P
Firstly, 360 just got the highest rated FPS and Driver this year plus, keep these words in mind when talking about investing wisely...[QUOTE="G-O-M-J"]Their biggest mistake was relying on third parties for exclusive games, it seemed like it was going to pay off at the start of the gen but look at how many exclusives the 360 has lost to ps3 and pc. They should have invested their money more wisely like Sony.SecretPolice
Sony shares nearing junk bond status :o That is all. :P
I was talking to an investor friend of mine and i asked him about sony, because i was thinking of buying some of their cheap stock in hopes they will turn it around at some point... his words, "nobody is going anywhere near sony... dont"... he did clue me in that you stand to make quite a profit by investing in take2 right now... though everyday we get closer to gta5 that profit goes down. Hes up over $1000 from his investment 6 months ago and climbing.I just love how delusional Cows have gotten these days. :lol:
A+ entertainment they're delivering. For free! :)
Their biggest mistake was relying on third parties for exclusive games, it seemed like it was going to pay off at the start of the gen but look at how many exclusives the 360 has lost to ps3 and pc. They should have invested their money more wisely like Sony.G-O-M-J
Oh, you mean the company that hasn't seen a profitable quarter in more than four consecutive years?
I don't think anyone should be following Sony's lead when it comes to investment strategy.
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]It is pretty pathetic to say the least... how do i get to make up my own facts and pretend that theyre real? Not as pathetic as lems trying to end the gen ASAP :lol:I just love how delusional Cows have gotten these days. :lol:
A+ entertainment they're delivering. For free! :)
TheEroica
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment