This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Badosh"][QUOTE="checkoff"] who cares about the party bs. it's about games sony or microsoft publish those will always be exclusive.checkoffYou got proved wrong. Who cares now, am i right? Beside,s you care, you've gone on about it for the last 2 pages. i didnt get proved wrong. lol resistance is still exclusive even if they start making games for 360.
Resistance sucks.
[QUOTE="StormyJoe"]
[QUOTE="PressXtoJump"]
It started this gen in 1st place (lems count it when other systems arent out yet), to 2nd, to last.
What was its biggest mistake?
NineTailedGoku
Xbox sales: 24 million
360 sales 70+ million
Yes, the 360 failed...:roll:
By that logic, the Dreamcast was a success seeing that it sold more than the Saturn. I like how Lems try to use previous gens to make PS3 look b@d and make 360 look good.To determine a consoles success you have to look at its games, infulenece, and sales milestone. The truth is both PS3 and 360 are a success.As you can see with the Wii,1st place is very overrated and doesnt make your console any better. No console has ever got by on its name alone, so bringing up the past Playstations to downplay PS3s successful comeback is bad damage control considering PS3 came later with more obstacles.
Moron. Sega stopped manufacturing the Dreamcast and bowed out of making consoles due to fierce competition. Microsoft is making a profit on every Xbox 360 sold and is neck and neck with the PS3 in sales and most importantly Microsoft stole market share from Sony. Dreamcast did not do that. You can't possibly be that dumb or are you just that pathetic will spout garbage to try to win an argument you clearly lost.
i had like 43657654654 gaming magazines in 90s lol dont try to tell me anything.checkoffToo bad you didn't take the time to actually read any of them....
Too bad you didn't take the time to actually read any of them.... read all of them. any game published by sony or microsoft is considered part of their first party exclusive. even though it's not truly first party which is owned and published by the company like nintendos games.[QUOTE="checkoff"]i had like 43657654654 gaming magazines in 90s lol dont try to tell me anything.Bruce_Benzing
[QUOTE="StormyJoe"]
[QUOTE="PressXtoJump"]
It started this gen in 1st place (lems count it when other systems arent out yet), to 2nd, to last.
What was its biggest mistake?
NineTailedGoku
Xbox sales: 24 million
360 sales 70+ million
Yes, the 360 failed...:roll:
By that logic, the Dreamcast was a success seeing that it sold more than the Saturn. I like how Lems try to use previous gens to make PS3 look b@d and make 360 look good.To determine a consoles success you have to look at its games, infulenece, and sales milestone. The truth is both PS3 and 360 are a success.As you can see with the Wii,1st place is very overrated and doesnt make your console any better. No console has ever got by on its name alone, so bringing up the past Playstations to downplay PS3s successful comeback is bad damage control considering PS3 came later with more obstacles.
Ok, you have obviously never taken any business classes. A decrease in market share and or sales from one generation to the next for any product is bad for a company. A decrease in sales and/or market share at the expense of a company's competition is worse. That is where the PS3 is right now.
Lets be honest, it's not like studios are going to look at this and say "OMG, I guess we need to cancel 360 game development!".
Kid? What are you, 12? And, it's not considered even, you're just wrong....[QUOTE="checkoff"] Nope you are just a kid in denial. HINTS I SAID CONSIDERED.Badosh
[QUOTE="Badosh"]Kid? What are you, 12? And, it's not considered even, you're just wrong. ITS A EXCLUSIVE LOL FIRST PARTY GAMES ARE EXCLUSIVE/ it's just a terminology.First party refers to the developer, not whether or not the game is exclusive...[QUOTE="checkoff"] Nope you are just a kid in denial. HINTS I SAID CONSIDERED.checkoff
[QUOTE="Badosh"]Kid? What are you, 12? And, it's not considered even, you're just wrong. ITS A EXCLUSIVE LOL FIRST PARTY GAMES ARE EXCLUSIVE/ it's just a terminology. an* Also, First party games are not always exclusive. Fable 3 isn't exclusive.[QUOTE="checkoff"] Nope you are just a kid in denial. HINTS I SAID CONSIDERED.checkoff
[QUOTE="checkoff"][QUOTE="Badosh"] Kid? What are you, 12? And, it's not considered even, you're just wrong.superclockedITS A EXCLUSIVE LOL FIRST PARTY GAMES ARE EXCLUSIVE/ it's just a terminology.First party refers to the developer, not whether or not the game is exclusive... lol what im saying is first party is just a terminology for saying a games exclusive even if it's not truly first party.
[QUOTE="Badosh"][QUOTE="checkoff"] you arent aware of what first party and second party and third party really is though. i call games first party these days if they're exclusive even if they're truly not.checkoffJust because you use the wrong terminology, doesn't mean that everyone else in the world is as stupid as you. everyone in the world is dumber than me thats why you are arguing over d*mbass sh1t.
Again, you're the one who created the argument. What does that say about you?
[QUOTE="Badosh"]Again, first party games are not always exclusive. i gave you an example of this before. checkofffirst party games are always exclusive and u didnt give example. Yes, I did. You are just too big a moron to notice. Fable 3. Developed by a First Party Studio, LionHead. It was released on both the 360 and PC. Therefore not exclusive.
[QUOTE="checkoff"][QUOTE="Badosh"]Again, first party games are not always exclusive. i gave you an example of this before. Badoshfirst party games are always exclusive and u didnt give example. Yes, I did. You are just too big a moron to notice. Fable 3. Developed by a First Party Studio, LionHead. It was released on both the 360 and PC. Therefore not exclusive. its microsoft platform smart guy designed for microsoft windows it's exclusive.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment