Digital Foundry: It's Too Late For PS4 NEO

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

74021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#101 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 74021 Posts

@Antwan3K said:

Scalebound, Halo, Crackdown, and any other major title from Microsoft is coming to both Xbox consoles and Windows 10 PCs complete with Xbox Play Anywhere which provides universal cross-buy, cross-play, and cross-saves.. All those games will be exclusive to Windows 10 devices and the Xbox One S and Xbox Scorpio are both "Windows 10 devices"..

That being said, you still haven't answered my question: Why would a casual console gamer interested in playing Xbox/Win10 exclusives skip out on paying $299 for a Xbox One S or maybe $399-$599 for the Scorpio in favor of spending maybe $899~ on building a high-end gaming PC?.. didn't you say "The new Xbox will undoubtedly cost more as well making it fall even further behind"?.. that implies that price is a primary issue.. and if price is a primary issue why would a casual console gamer pay more money to game on a high-end PC just to play Halo 6, Gears 4, Crackdown, Scalebound, and others when those same games are also available for a $299 Xbox One S?.. Even the Scorpio will likely cost much less than a 6 teraflop PC build so again, why would that customer skip the Scorpio option in favor of the higher priced PC?.. and keep in mind, we're talking about a relatively uniformed Gamestop customer who's primarily concerns are (and I quote) ""where are the games and which ones are good" and "how much".".. And why would they buy a PS4 when the PS4 doesn't have any of those games available?

All console gamers are PC gamers. Haven't you heard the news. We will all be on Xbox Live.

Avatar image for deactivated-57d8401f17c55
deactivated-57d8401f17c55

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#102 deactivated-57d8401f17c55
Member since 2012 • 7221 Posts

Doesn't seem like it would be that difficult to overclock, add better cooling and more memory. After all Sony sent out Ps4 dev kits with only 4gb memory.

Avatar image for AM-Gamer
AM-Gamer

8116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 AM-Gamer
Member since 2012 • 8116 Posts

You poor lems act like Sony won't release a PS5 two years from now.

Avatar image for NFJSupreme
NFJSupreme

6605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 NFJSupreme
Member since 2005 • 6605 Posts

And just like that power doesn't matter to cows anymore lol

Avatar image for Douevenlift_bro
Douevenlift_bro

6804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 Douevenlift_bro
Member since 2013 • 6804 Posts

@Pedro said:
@Douevenlift_bro said:

Funny how Street Fighter V wasn't considered exclusive by lems cuz it can be played on PC, however the reverse doesn't apply now lol.

Nobody will buy the downgraded Xbox version when for that amount of spending they can have the PC version without jumping through MS hoops and risk free. We do know Microsoft likes to kill their consoles early

Enjoy :)

Can it be played on the Xbox One? No. It can only be played on a Sony console.

Funny you mention MS killing their consoles early when the Neo is on the horizon and the XBox One S is on the horizon. So, by your drain water analogy, Sony is abandoning their console.

Also by your stupid analogy you all console gamers are going to be PC gamers with this new move by MS. See you on Xbox Live.

You cannot win a console war with your message being "No exclusive reason to own our console, but just buy it anyway"

You think I'm telling you this because I hate MS and want them to fail ? I said similar things at the start of this gen. Xbone lost EVERYTHING that made it unique.. Kinect, exclusives, better online. It's no mystery they are and will continue to get thrashed and pounded by Sony.

But hey, don't listen to me... Please believe them. See you holiday '17 ;)

Avatar image for Antwan3K
Antwan3K

9411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 Antwan3K
Member since 2005 • 9411 Posts

@Pedro said:
@Antwan3K said:

Scalebound, Halo, Crackdown, and any other major title from Microsoft is coming to both Xbox consoles and Windows 10 PCs complete with Xbox Play Anywhere which provides universal cross-buy, cross-play, and cross-saves.. All those games will be exclusive to Windows 10 devices and the Xbox One S and Xbox Scorpio are both "Windows 10 devices"..

That being said, you still haven't answered my question: Why would a casual console gamer interested in playing Xbox/Win10 exclusives skip out on paying $299 for a Xbox One S or maybe $399-$599 for the Scorpio in favor of spending maybe $899~ on building a high-end gaming PC?.. didn't you say "The new Xbox will undoubtedly cost more as well making it fall even further behind"?.. that implies that price is a primary issue.. and if price is a primary issue why would a casual console gamer pay more money to game on a high-end PC just to play Halo 6, Gears 4, Crackdown, Scalebound, and others when those same games are also available for a $299 Xbox One S?.. Even the Scorpio will likely cost much less than a 6 teraflop PC build so again, why would that customer skip the Scorpio option in favor of the higher priced PC?.. and keep in mind, we're talking about a relatively uniformed Gamestop customer who's primarily concerns are (and I quote) ""where are the games and which ones are good" and "how much".".. And why would they buy a PS4 when the PS4 doesn't have any of those games available?

All console gamers are PC gamers. Haven't you heard the news. We will all be on Xbox Live.

I would say that we're all "Xbox gamers".. different pieces of hardware, different price points, different specs but the same Xbox Live community, same Windows 10 core, same Azure cloud..

It should be painfully obvious from the Microsoft E3 brief: Xbox is a gaming platform and Windows 10 is the core of that platform.. Play without boundaries..

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#107  Edited By lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62046 Posts

@AM-Gamer said:

You poor lems act like Sony won't release a PS5 two years from now.

The Neo's specs were already leaked. Even if this is Xbox's full-fledged next-gen system, there hasn't been a whisper of a full-fledged next-gen release for Sony. Which would be weird.

Avatar image for aroxx_ab
aroxx_ab

13236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#108 aroxx_ab
Member since 2005 • 13236 Posts

@NFJSupreme said:

And just like that power doesn't matter to cows anymore lol

Power always matters, thats why people will play Xbox games on PC now.

Avatar image for xantufrog
xantufrog

17898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#109 xantufrog  Moderator
Member since 2013 • 17898 Posts

It's undeniable that Neo is now screwed in a raw power lineup. But to me that's irrelevant- I heartily disagree that the power difference was the ps4's "only" edge so far this generation... specifically, although PS4 got off to a slower start than X1 in this domain it has a substantially larger and more appealing library to me. Ignoring the inevitable "lol indies" "lol artsy fartsy" "lol weaboo" snarls from the Bros, it's a fact that Sony is offering more games of my taste.

So, given that, what am I to think about the power disparity? Nothing much, in truth. The PS2 and Dreamcast were in exactly this position and we're by far my preferred consoles from that Era. And, indeed, the ps2 performed as well in sales as its library was big

Games, games, games. That's what matters to me. Nintendo and Sony are nailing it harder than MS in that space.

Note, this is not to negate the cool games MS has in the pipeline (e.g., ReCore). And of course, this being SW I'm sure someone is going to throw a list at me, but people always seem to forget about the ever critical factor: personal taste. Gears of War is not a selling point for me. But stuff like ReCore is. As it happens, PS and Nintendo offer numerically more titles to my taste

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#110  Edited By lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62046 Posts

@aroxx_ab said:

Power always matters, thats why people will play Xbox games on PC now.

Except that there are still plenty of people who will only use consoles, as evidenced in multiple PC Vs. Console threads on this board. To those people, the Xbox will still be relevant.

Avatar image for darklight4
darklight4

2094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 darklight4
Member since 2009 • 2094 Posts

@Chozofication: All we have to go on is that leaked document about the neo. All Sony have done is acknowledged it's existence also you make a good point.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

74021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#112 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 74021 Posts

@xantufrog said:

It's undeniable that Neo is now screwed in a raw power lineup. But to me that's irrelevant- I heartily disagree that the power difference was the ps4's "only" edge so far this generation... specifically, although PS4 got off to a slower start than X1 in this domain it has a substantially larger and more appealing library to me. Ignoring the inevitable "lol indies" "lol artsy fartsy" "lol weaboo" snarls from the Bros, it's a fact that Sony is offering more games of my taste.

So, given that, what am I to think about the power disparity? Nothing much, in truth. The PS2 and Dreamcast were in exactly this position and we're by far my preferred consoles from that Era. And, indeed, the ps2 performed as well in sales as its library was big

Games, games, games. That's what matters to me. Nintendo and Sony are nailing it harder than MS in that space.

Note, this is not to negate the cool games MS has in the pipeline (e.g., ReCore). And of course, this being SW I'm sure someone is going to throw a list at me, but people always seem to forget about the ever critical factor: personal taste. Gears of War is not a selling point for me. But stuff like ReCore is. As it happens, PS and Nintendo offer numerically more titles to my taste

Screw you personal list. All that matters is my list and my list only. Now get to stepping. :D

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

74021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#113 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 74021 Posts

@aroxx_ab said:
@NFJSupreme said:

And just like that power doesn't matter to cows anymore lol

Power always matters, thats why people will play Xbox games on PC now.

See you on Xbox Live.

Avatar image for Sepewrath
Sepewrath

30712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#114 Sepewrath
Member since 2005 • 30712 Posts

The take home with both of these, since neither company has the guts to actually move onto this hardware--unless of course it just flew off the shelves, then their story about no one left behind would change. Your not getting any unique games on the system. Dead Rising 4 will look slightly better IF you bought a 4K TV. VR will run slightly better if you shell out for all the VR components. All their selling is "these things will be a little better, if you buy a bunch of stuff on top of the system." What's the point. I guess for those that just have to have 4K, its good for them. But UC4 looks fine to me, the way it is now. And I would assume, tell me if I'm wrong, the framerate in MP games has to be consistent across the board.

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#115 Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts

Weren't lems crying foul bc of NEO......but now it's OK to start a generation 4 years into the last?

Either way it won't have any games, so I'll stick to my PS4.

Avatar image for Tessellation
Tessellation

9297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 Tessellation
Member since 2009 • 9297 Posts

@AM-Gamer said:

You poor lems act like Sony won't release a PS5 two years from now.

damn son you mad as hell,lulz

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#117 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

@b_rich84 said:
@charizard1605 said:

A good portion of PlayStation 4's success has been down to its spec advantage over Xbox One, combined with a focus on the hardcore player. Sony's technological advantage will be gone with the next wave of hardware - we already know that it cannot support true 4K resolution on cutting-edge games, because we've seen the internal documents that outline Sony's upscaling strategies for 4K display support (more on that soon). It's also unfeasible for Sony to produce a radically revised Neo - the silicon has been designed, developer kits have gone out. Matching Scorpio would require scrapping Neo's existing processor completely.

Just about the only option available to Sony is the route Microsoft chose for Xbox One in the face of PS4's higher specification - overclocking the processor. It could inch the Neo a little closer to the target Scorpio spec, but hitting 6TF there is off the table: Sony would need a 40 CU Polaris 10 clocked at 1.2GHz to hit the same level. And that wouldn't address the 100GB/s bandwidth deficit or the 4GB memory gap we suspect will separate Neo and Scorpio.

But there is an elephant in the room here: price. Microsoft's brief to AMD in producing this behemoth of a semi-custom design looks pretty obvious - to create the most powerful console possible. The GPU is more powerful and it's going to be larger, which means it's going to be more expensive to produce. Meanwhile, assuming we're right about the 4GB of additional memory, that's not going to be cheap either - when we attended AMD's Munich launch event for Fury X and the Radeon 300 series, we were told that adding an additional 4GB of GDDR5 to the R9 390/390X cost around them around $30 per unit. In short, we would not be surprised to see Scorpio cost significantly more than Neo - maybe even $100 more.

But there's certainly going to be pressure on Sony here - particularly as its next console is targeted at the hardcore player, who wants the very best. If Neo launches this year, it'll have a healthy headstart over Scorpio. However, if we're looking at a March 2017 launch, many may consider until Scorpio appears - especially as the new hardware stands to deliver a tangibly more impressive technological upgrade over the established PlayStation 4.

SOURCE

Well, then. According to DF, the PS4 NEO is out and out outclassed by the Scorpio, and it is far too late for Sony to be able to go back to the drawing board and try and respond to the Scorpio's outrageous specs.

Sony's only option is to launch early, but either way, they have lost the one edge they had over Microsoft this generation- the better designed, more powerful console.

As far as sales go it will not matter. The average consumer does not know all this and people will still walk into Best Buy and see a PS4 "neo" or Xbox "Scorpio" and still buy the PS4 so I'm confused as to why the tone of the articles is what it is. I feels like they are saying Sony is in trouble which it isn't. The Xbox brand has no titles to drive sales anymore, they literally only have Halo now.

you forgot gears of war.

Avatar image for the_master_race
the_master_race

5226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#118  Edited By the_master_race
Member since 2015 • 5226 Posts
@R4gn4r0k said:
@the_master_race said:

people don't buy consoles for exclusives , pc gamers buy consoles for exclusives

Ok, good point.

But I don't consider myself a PC gamer who buys exclusives on consoles. I just purchase whatever game on whatever system it runs best at and on which I can find the cheapest price, and that turns out to be PC 99.99% of the time.

If console games would somehow be cheaper than PC games and offer a better experience, I'd have no problem switching... It's just, they don't :P

+1 , you're doing the right thing , getting the best performance and cheap games is why I'm still a PC gamer -I love Nintendo but it's hard for me to afford the cost of two platforms- , I said it many times here and in other boards, a game should never be exclusive unless the developer decides to make it exclusive ....XCOM2 is a good example of that , also Star Citizen , wouldn't it be good if we could play Bloodborne on PC , ...IDK why Sony fear to share it's library with PC , their exclusives never been as profitable as their multiplat titles

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#119 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

@a-new-guardian said:

They said they're not leaving.anyone behind. Meaning no matter how powerful the Scorpio is, They are still limited by the weak bone.

You can down port games as well look at shadows of mordor for example Designed from the ground up for Current gen consoles but then Down ported to the Ps3 and 360

Avatar image for dalger21
dalger21

2231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#120 dalger21
Member since 2002 • 2231 Posts

@the_master_race said:

...IDK why Sony fear to share it's library with PC , their exclusives never been as profitable as their multiplat titles

The Last of Us, Uncharted, God of War, etc says hello.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

74021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#121 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 74021 Posts

@the_master_race said:

+1 , you're doing the right thing , getting the best performance and cheap games is why I'm still a PC gamer -I love Nintendo but it's hard for me to afford the cost of two platforms- , I said it many times here and in other boards, a game should never be exclusive unless the developer decides to make it exclusive ....XCOM2 is a good example of that , also Star Citizen , wouldn't it be good if we could Bloodborne on PC , ...IDK why Sony fear to share it's library with PC , their exclusives never been as profitable as their multiplat titles

I concur. I want to be able to play the same game at one cost across any platform of my choosing. Xbox is heading in that direction. I hope its success forces Sony to do the same. I want to ideally play all of my games on one platform and not multiple.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 49139 Posts

@the_master_race said:

+1 , you're doing the right thing , getting the best performance and cheap games is why I'm still a PC gamer -I love Nintendo but it's hard for me to afford the cost of two platforms- , I said it many times here and in other boards, a game should never be exclusive unless the developer decides to make it exclusive ....XCOM2 is a good example of that , also Star Citizen , wouldn't it be good if we could play Bloodborne on PC , ...IDK why Sony fear to share it's library with PC , their exclusives never been as profitable as their multiplat titles

So you didn't buy a Wii U ?

I always think Nintendo is the perfect compliment for PC... Because it always used to be the case that PC did not get 3D and 2D Platformers, which I absolutely love.

So far Sony has brought some smaller games to PC: Helldivers and Everyone's gone to the rapture. I'm not expecting UC4 or Ratchet and Clank or anything; But getting Bloodborne a year or so down the line wouldn't hurt their sales imo.

Avatar image for speedfog
speedfog

4966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#123 speedfog
Member since 2009 • 4966 Posts

Well well, cows always say how great DF is. Here you go cows, next gen didn't even start it and you lost already.

Also lol @ the tears

Avatar image for AM-Gamer
AM-Gamer

8116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124  Edited By AM-Gamer
Member since 2012 • 8116 Posts

@Tessellation: Not mad at all actually... I'm pumped the 7 year cycle of weak hardware is finished. And BC is now a priority for both. To me this is awesome for console gaming.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f26ef21d6f71
deactivated-5f26ef21d6f71

2521

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 deactivated-5f26ef21d6f71
Member since 2006 • 2521 Posts

LMFAO

Look at all the butthurt scared Cows in here and their "toned down" passive aggressiveness in their posts.

Karma's a bitch. I know.

Greatness Awaits (literally) for MS fans and gamers. You asked and you got it. Developers wanted it and they also got it!

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

74021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#126 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 74021 Posts

@AM-Gamer said:

@Tessellation: Not mad at all actually... I'm pumped the 7 year cycle of weak hardware is finished. And BC is now a priority for both. To me this is awesome for console gaming.

Now they only need to make all their games multi-platform. :D

Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 Phazevariance
Member since 2003 • 12356 Posts

Xbox exclusives are now MS exclusives. Amazing that you can buy on PC or Xbox and get it for both platforms. You still can't play those games on a PlayStation console. Then you have the choice, spend $2000-2500 for a high end computer with gtx 1080 cards and the latest CPU/RAM combo, or $400-500 for a high end console (scorpio). Meanwhile, PS4Neo will still have it's precious exclusives, but they will be made for an under powered console for whatever that's worth. MS has a good strategy on this cross buy plan, and in a way it's getting Sony back for their last minute upgrades when the PS4 came out.

Avatar image for the-a-baum
The-A-Baum

1370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#128 The-A-Baum
Member since 2015 • 1370 Posts

There are more than a few things floating around this thread that are just wrong.

Devs do Not have to develop for different systems. They have UWP, write one code and it works for all. Sony does not have that, and does not own anything in the PC place so since MS does, and the game code has already been written, why not release it on the Windows store?

Sony was the first to open this Pandora's box and now it is biting them in the ass. MS is putting out a monster!

And please with Gamestop Best Buy shoppers. I have seen a-holes come out of the wood work to tell an Xbox shopper that PS4 is 40% more powerful. Now different a-holes will come out of the wood work to tell PS Neo shoppers Scorpio is 200% more powerful.

Let's face it the reality of difference between One and Four, is not that big but it still hurt sales. Next consoles will have huge differences. Xbox being weaker will not be an excuse anymore.

And finally Sony will put out PS 5 in 2 years? I hope they do. That sounds disastrous! Most PS4 owners at pissed about Neo. Now after they buy one, PS 5 is coming out?

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

74021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#129 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 74021 Posts

@Phazevariance said:

Xbox exclusives are now MS exclusives. Amazing that you can buy on PC or Xbox and get it for both platforms. You still can't play those games on a PlayStation console. Then you have the choice, spend $2000-2500 for a high end computer with gtx 1080 cards and the latest CPU/RAM combo, or $400-500 for a high end console (scorpio). Meanwhile, PS4Neo will still have it's precious exclusives, but they will be made for an under powered console for whatever that's worth. MS has a good strategy on this cross buy plan, and in a way it's getting Sony back for their last minute upgrades when the PS4 came out.

A high end PC is $500 less than your price range.

Avatar image for gago-gago
gago-gago

12138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#130 gago-gago
Member since 2009 • 12138 Posts

The Scorpio was truly a megaton for this year's E3. Sony caught wind of it a few days before E3, they panicked, confirmed the NeO but hid it from sight because of embarrassment as they were shocked and awed on how the hell did MS beat them to the punch and MS having the strongest punch. It really left Sony speechless so that's why they didn't even talk at all during their conference.

Even before the confirmation of the NeO, many developers were already not happy with the NeO because of the policies Sony set. They had to develop around it instead for it. Now with the confirmation of the Scorpio and Microsoft being known for being welcoming and accommodating for developers, many developers will favor the Scorpio and make it the lead platform. I'm no sure what Sony should do now, maybe they should just scrap the whole NeO thing, wait a few more years and come out with a PS5. PSVR is going to fail anyway, so scrap that too and maybe they could just release a slim PS4 with 4K video instead. #GreatmessAwaits

Avatar image for the_master_race
the_master_race

5226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#131 the_master_race
Member since 2015 • 5226 Posts
@R4gn4r0k said:
@the_master_race said:

+1 , you're doing the right thing , getting the best performance and cheap games is why I'm still a PC gamer -I love Nintendo but it's hard for me to afford the cost of two platforms- , I said it many times here and in other boards, a game should never be exclusive unless the developer decides to make it exclusive ....XCOM2 is a good example of that , also Star Citizen , wouldn't it be good if we could play Bloodborne on PC , ...IDK why Sony fear to share it's library with PC , their exclusives never been as profitable as their multiplat titles

So you didn't buy a Wii U ?

I always think Nintendo is the perfect compliment for PC... Because it always used to be the case that PC did not get 3D and 2D Platformers, which I absolutely love.

So far Sony has brought some smaller games to PC: Helldivers and Everyone's gone to the rapture. I'm not expecting UC4 or Ratchet and Clank or anything; But getting Bloodborne a year or so down the line wouldn't hurt their sales imo.

Nope but NX is on my wishlist , and I agree releasing any exclusive wouldn't hurt their sales , PC doesn't belong to Microsoft , Valve or any other companies , even Sony can get into it if they know how

Avatar image for draign
Draign

1824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#132 Draign
Member since 2013 • 1824 Posts

@the_master_race said:
@R4gn4r0k said:
@the_master_race said:

+1 , you're doing the right thing , getting the best performance and cheap games is why I'm still a PC gamer -I love Nintendo but it's hard for me to afford the cost of two platforms- , I said it many times here and in other boards, a game should never be exclusive unless the developer decides to make it exclusive ....XCOM2 is a good example of that , also Star Citizen , wouldn't it be good if we could play Bloodborne on PC , ...IDK why Sony fear to share it's library with PC , their exclusives never been as profitable as their multiplat titles

So you didn't buy a Wii U ?

I always think Nintendo is the perfect compliment for PC... Because it always used to be the case that PC did not get 3D and 2D Platformers, which I absolutely love.

So far Sony has brought some smaller games to PC: Helldivers and Everyone's gone to the rapture. I'm not expecting UC4 or Ratchet and Clank or anything; But getting Bloodborne a year or so down the line wouldn't hurt their sales imo.

Nope but NX is on my wishlist , and I agree releasing any exclusive wouldn't hurt their sales , PC doesn't belong to Microsoft , Valve or any other companies , even Sony can get into it if they know how

What will happen if Sony decides to put their titles on PC as well?

Avatar image for adsparky
adsparky

2833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#133 adsparky
Member since 2006 • 2833 Posts

What intrigues me is the price point of both, SCORPIO and NEO; but SCORPIO sounds really expensive...

Avatar image for AM-Gamer
AM-Gamer

8116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134  Edited By AM-Gamer
Member since 2012 • 8116 Posts

@Pedro: I'd disagree with that ... exclusives allow extra attention to the hardware. Not to mention both Sony and MS would spend much less if they weren't trying to push there own ecosystems.

Avatar image for Midnightshade29
Midnightshade29

6003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 301

User Lists: 0

#135 Midnightshade29
Member since 2008 • 6003 Posts

Does it really matter at this point? This isnt ew gen tech. I predict many arent even going to be buying these unless you live in your parents basement, are single with no life, or super rich.

The prospect of buying a whole new console in the same gen for a few fps and a resolution bump for a television i dont own would be well moronic.

If this was a new gen i could see the power difference mean something. But most console owners dont go in for power, they go in for price. Look at the ps4 launch, that $100 difference was everyrhing. If xbone was $400 at launch and ps4 was $500, this gen would be reversed (and if ms didnt screw over gamers with drm announcments and kinnect)

Then you also have to take into account the people already invested in ps4, more than double the bone. These people arent going to drop all their downloaded games and friends list for a bone ver2 with a few more pixels on the same gen. It would be like snes people shelling out for a genesis with 32x combo...it just is not going to happen besides a small minority of loud rich lemmings.

,

Avatar image for mjorh
mjorh

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#136 mjorh
Member since 2011 • 6749 Posts

@dynamitecop: i agree with you , the thing is i don't think they can nail 4K ... as you know 4K res requires a significant amount of power, unless they tune down the settings ...like 4K on Medium or sth

Avatar image for Martin_G_N
Martin_G_N

2124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 Martin_G_N
Member since 2006 • 2124 Posts

If the PS4 NEO is priced lower than the X1 Scorpio, the NEO will sell better. 4K in games is still a small market, most people have 1080p TV's, and the people that have 4K TV's use it for movies. At 1080p/60fps, 4.4 TFLOPS in the NEO is enough. Especially considering that all games will still have to be made with the original X1 and PS4 in mind.

We're not far away from a new generation either, so paying too much for an upgraded version of a console now would be pretty stupid.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#138 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60833 Posts

That what we all wanted right? That's what I was expecting MS to come out swinging, now Sony in turn will attempt to do the same. All we need now is to see the price point and how well these monsters will sell.

I'm buying day 1 just like Ive said for 3 years now.

awwww yeahhhh

Avatar image for AM-Gamer
AM-Gamer

8116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139  Edited By AM-Gamer
Member since 2012 • 8116 Posts

@draign: They never will. Not as long as they make hardware.

Avatar image for deactivated-583e460ca986b
deactivated-583e460ca986b

7240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 deactivated-583e460ca986b
Member since 2004 • 7240 Posts

@xantufrog said:

It's undeniable that Neo is now screwed in a raw power lineup. But to me that's irrelevant- I heartily disagree that the power difference was the ps4's "only" edge so far this generation... specifically, although PS4 got off to a slower start than X1 in this domain it has a substantially larger and more appealing library to me. Ignoring the inevitable "lol indies" "lol artsy fartsy" "lol weaboo" snarls from the Bros, it's a fact that Sony is offering more games of my taste.

So, given that, what am I to think about the power disparity? Nothing much, in truth. The PS2 and Dreamcast were in exactly this position and we're by far my preferred consoles from that Era. And, indeed, the ps2 performed as well in sales as its library was big

Games, games, games. That's what matters to me. Nintendo and Sony are nailing it harder than MS in that space.

Note, this is not to negate the cool games MS has in the pipeline (e.g., ReCore). And of course, this being SW I'm sure someone is going to throw a list at me, but people always seem to forget about the ever critical factor: personal taste. Gears of War is not a selling point for me. But stuff like ReCore is. As it happens, PS and Nintendo offer numerically more titles to my taste

Games, games, games would make sense if that was how the real world works. Exclusives fall off the sales chart within a month if they ever chart at all. Look at Bloodborne (charted once) Sunset Overdrive (never charted) Forza 6 (never charted) Infamous Second Son (charted once) just to name a few. Exclusives have not pushed console sales for some time now. And lets not act like there are far fewer exclusives now then there have ever been. Multiplats push hardware and sell millions more than exclusives ever will. So why not push to have the best version of those multiplats? Sony having marketing rights to COD is a bigger deal for them revenue wise than Horizon or God of War will ever be.

Bringing up the PS2 era doesn't play any more. Things changed in the 360/PS3 era. People starting caring about things like "the cell processor" and HD graphics. Digital Foundry became a thing. People starting talking about GDDR5 not knowing what the hell it was or what it did. Power means more now than it ever did in terms of marketing and word of mouth. And if M$ can pull a VR deal with Oculus that could be a big blow to Sony. For one, they wouldn't have to spend any R&D, manufacturing or marketing money, and 2 their new box will be far more VR capable.

Avatar image for Tessellation
Tessellation

9297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 Tessellation
Member since 2009 • 9297 Posts

@AM-Gamer said:

@Tessellation: Not mad at all actually... I'm pumped the 7 year cycle of weak hardware is finished. And BC is now a priority for both. To me this is awesome for console gaming.

i wasn't being serious anyways haha

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#142  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@charizard1605 said:

A good portion of PlayStation 4's success has been down to its spec advantage over Xbox One, combined with a focus on the hardcore player. Sony's technological advantage will be gone with the next wave of hardware - we already know that it cannot support true 4K resolution on cutting-edge games, because we've seen the internal documents that outline Sony's upscaling strategies for 4K display support (more on that soon). It's also unfeasible for Sony to produce a radically revised Neo - the silicon has been designed, developer kits have gone out. Matching Scorpio would require scrapping Neo's existing processor completely.

Just about the only option available to Sony is the route Microsoft chose for Xbox One in the face of PS4's higher specification - overclocking the processor. It could inch the Neo a little closer to the target Scorpio spec, but hitting 6TF there is off the table: Sony would need a 40 CU Polaris 10 clocked at 1.2GHz to hit the same level. And that wouldn't address the 100GB/s bandwidth deficit or the 4GB memory gap we suspect will separate Neo and Scorpio.

But there is an elephant in the room here: price. Microsoft's brief to AMD in producing this behemoth of a semi-custom design looks pretty obvious - to create the most powerful console possible. The GPU is more powerful and it's going to be larger, which means it's going to be more expensive to produce. Meanwhile, assuming we're right about the 4GB of additional memory, that's not going to be cheap either - when we attended AMD's Munich launch event for Fury X and the Radeon 300 series, we were told that adding an additional 4GB of GDDR5 to the R9 390/390X cost around them around $30 per unit. In short, we would not be surprised to see Scorpio cost significantly more than Neo - maybe even $100 more.

But there's certainly going to be pressure on Sony here - particularly as its next console is targeted at the hardcore player, who wants the very best. If Neo launches this year, it'll have a healthy headstart over Scorpio. However, if we're looking at a March 2017 launch, many may consider until Scorpio appears - especially as the new hardware stands to deliver a tangibly more impressive technological upgrade over the established PlayStation 4.

SOURCE

Well, then. According to DF, the PS4 NEO is out and out outclassed by the Scorpio, and it is far too late for Sony to be able to go back to the drawing board and try and respond to the Scorpio's outrageous specs.

Sony's only option is to launch early, but either way, they have lost the one edge they had over Microsoft this generation- the better designed, more powerful console.

From the size of GDDR5 memory module, Scorpio SoC seems to be smaller than PS4's 348 mm^2. The top picture is 7870/7850 PCB.

The following is PS4's SoC.

Avatar image for the_master_race
the_master_race

5226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#143 the_master_race
Member since 2015 • 5226 Posts

@draign said:
@the_master_race said:
@R4gn4r0k said:
@the_master_race said:

+1 , you're doing the right thing , getting the best performance and cheap games is why I'm still a PC gamer -I love Nintendo but it's hard for me to afford the cost of two platforms- , I said it many times here and in other boards, a game should never be exclusive unless the developer decides to make it exclusive ....XCOM2 is a good example of that , also Star Citizen , wouldn't it be good if we could play Bloodborne on PC , ...IDK why Sony fear to share it's library with PC , their exclusives never been as profitable as their multiplat titles

So you didn't buy a Wii U ?

I always think Nintendo is the perfect compliment for PC... Because it always used to be the case that PC did not get 3D and 2D Platformers, which I absolutely love.

So far Sony has brought some smaller games to PC: Helldivers and Everyone's gone to the rapture. I'm not expecting UC4 or Ratchet and Clank or anything; But getting Bloodborne a year or so down the line wouldn't hurt their sales imo.

Nope but NX is on my wishlist , and I agree releasing any exclusive wouldn't hurt their sales , PC doesn't belong to Microsoft , Valve or any other companies , even Sony can get into it if they know how

What will happen if Sony decides to put their titles on PC as well?

Some of fanboys will rage out and threaten Sony that they will sell their PS4s and other people oblivious to this stupid console wars keep playing on the platform they like

Avatar image for flyincloud1116
Flyincloud1116

6418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#144 Flyincloud1116
Member since 2014 • 6418 Posts

Power only matter on SW and other rabid forums. Did I just say that?

Avatar image for kingcrimson24
kingcrimson24

824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#145 kingcrimson24
Member since 2012 • 824 Posts


But it totally looks like MS was Tired of having the inferior system and decided to end it and bring up a Powerful system. I mean 6 Teraflops is Impressive , it really is .
I'm also sure Sony wanted to reveal PS4 neo in this E3 but after Xbox's conference they panicked and decided not to show anything of it.
There is still a lot to be revealed . Most Important being the PRICE . if Microsoft goes for a really cheap Price for this much power , there is big Win for them . lots of Gamers will Jump and buy that System ( except hardcore Play station fans who hate Microsoft like MS has Stole their Girlfriends or something ) . the Price has to be reasonably cheaper than PC's with the same power so that people don't just upgrade their PCs , specially since all of Xbox's Exclusives are also on PC .
Right now I'm still sticking with PC but if Scorpio's Price and detailed spec impress me then I'm buying one .

Avatar image for xantufrog
xantufrog

17898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#146  Edited By xantufrog  Moderator
Member since 2013 • 17898 Posts

@GoldenElementXL: you may be right when it comes to the mindless hordes looking to buy based on power. My answer was for myself, as I tried to make clear. I'm a PC gamer first and foremost, so I have never bought consoles for their power but rather for the unique experiences they could offer (same for PC as well, in fact, [e.g., Total War Warhammer, Starcraft, etc] - the number crunching has never been my thing, but if it were I'd not need consoles at all)

I like consoles because they are potentially a cheap addition to my gaming tech that allows me to expand my library. I have no need for an expensive console whose games are already on my platform

Again, this is strictly speaking for myself- I'm sure you are right that the Scorpio is great ammo for the console wars

Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 Phazevariance
Member since 2003 • 12356 Posts

@Pedro said:
@Phazevariance said:

Xbox exclusives are now MS exclusives. Amazing that you can buy on PC or Xbox and get it for both platforms. You still can't play those games on a PlayStation console. Then you have the choice, spend $2000-2500 for a high end computer with gtx 1080 cards and the latest CPU/RAM combo, or $400-500 for a high end console (scorpio). Meanwhile, PS4Neo will still have it's precious exclusives, but they will be made for an under powered console for whatever that's worth. MS has a good strategy on this cross buy plan, and in a way it's getting Sony back for their last minute upgrades when the PS4 came out.

A high end PC is $500 less than your price range.

Sure, but a $1500-2000 PC is still many times more than $400-500 console.

Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148  Edited By PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts

@charizard1605 said:

A good portion of PlayStation 4's success has been down to its spec advantage over Xbox One, combined with a focus on the hardcore player. Sony's technological advantage will be gone with the next wave of hardware - we already know that it cannot support true 4K resolution on cutting-edge games, because we've seen the internal documents that outline Sony's upscaling strategies for 4K display support (more on that soon). It's also unfeasible for Sony to produce a radically revised Neo - the silicon has been designed, developer kits have gone out. Matching Scorpio would require scrapping Neo's existing processor completely.

Just about the only option available to Sony is the route Microsoft chose for Xbox One in the face of PS4's higher specification - overclocking the processor. It could inch the Neo a little closer to the target Scorpio spec, but hitting 6TF there is off the table: Sony would need a 40 CU Polaris 10 clocked at 1.2GHz to hit the same level. And that wouldn't address the 100GB/s bandwidth deficit or the 4GB memory gap we suspect will separate Neo and Scorpio.

But there is an elephant in the room here: price. Microsoft's brief to AMD in producing this behemoth of a semi-custom design looks pretty obvious - to create the most powerful console possible. The GPU is more powerful and it's going to be larger, which means it's going to be more expensive to produce. Meanwhile, assuming we're right about the 4GB of additional memory, that's not going to be cheap either - when we attended AMD's Munich launch event for Fury X and the Radeon 300 series, we were told that adding an additional 4GB of GDDR5 to the R9 390/390X cost around them around $30 per unit. In short, we would not be surprised to see Scorpio cost significantly more than Neo - maybe even $100 more.

But there's certainly going to be pressure on Sony here - particularly as its next console is targeted at the hardcore player, who wants the very best. If Neo launches this year, it'll have a healthy headstart over Scorpio. However, if we're looking at a March 2017 launch, many may consider until Scorpio appears - especially as the new hardware stands to deliver a tangibly more impressive technological upgrade over the established PlayStation 4.

SOURCE

Well, then. According to DF, the PS4 NEO is out and out outclassed by the Scorpio, and it is far too late for Sony to be able to go back to the drawing board and try and respond to the Scorpio's outrageous specs.

Sony's only option is to launch early, but either way, they have lost the one edge they had over Microsoft this generation- the better designed, more powerful console.

Sony started the generation having a huge edge on price point. It's certainly possible that the Neo will cost $100 less than the Scorpio. Sony would be fine if that were the case. Microsoft is indicating that "nobody will be left behind" and that they will make all games on the Scorpio playable on the Xbone. That will severely limit the type of games that will show up on the Scorpio. Sony will still have a huge advantage on install base, and if they also have a price advantage on their high-end hardware, the Xbone will remain difficult to sell. Microsoft should have gone all in on a new console.

Avatar image for bunchanumbers
bunchanumbers

5709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#149 bunchanumbers
Member since 2013 • 5709 Posts

MS only needs to do 2 things now that Scorpio sent Sony running for the hills.

1. Knock the price of the OG Xbox 1 to $199 and the price of the S model to $249 at next years E3. This will be excellent entry point prices to enter the xbox ecosystem and I bet that it would sell like hot cakes.

2. Wait until Sony announces the price of Neo and the day after, announce the same price point for Scorpio. MS could price out Neo before it launches and kill the one advantage Neo could have over it.

Avatar image for aroxx_ab
aroxx_ab

13236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#150 aroxx_ab
Member since 2005 • 13236 Posts

@bunchanumbers said:

MS only needs to do 2 things now that Scorpio sent Sony running for the hills.

1. Knock the price of the OG Xbox 1 to $199 and the price of the S model to $249 at next years E3. This will be excellent entry point prices to enter the xbox ecosystem and I bet that it would sell like hot cakes.

2. Wait until Sony announces the price of Neo and the day after, announce the same price point for Scorpio. MS could price out Neo before it launches and kill the one advantage Neo could have over it.

Neo still got advantage over Scorpio, Neo got exclusives...