DOA:X3 Might Not Release in The West for Fear of Backlash

Avatar image for deactivated-58ce94803a170
deactivated-58ce94803a170

8822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#251  Edited By deactivated-58ce94803a170
Member since 2015 • 8822 Posts

@Byshop said:
@mesome713 said:
@Byshop said:
@mesome713 said:

@Byshop: It is bullying when you call others to boycott a company just because they disagree with you. Thats dirty. Thats censorship and entitlement. There business wont be hurt i can assure you this. Its will only improve their business. Nobody said TN is censoring, just that SJWs whine and try to censor and dictate others all the time. This is nothing new, they always do this bullying and trying to censor peoples work. Hence how they got their name SJWs.

rofl.

No, that's how every boycott in history has worked. That's literally what a boycott is. The difference here is that you don't agree with the reason for the boycott. That's a reason to not participate in it, but it's not a reason to call it dirty or bullying.

-Byshop

When you dont agree with someone, then disagree. Dont buy the product, but to try and bully a company into not releasing the product because you hope to hurt them financially and cause harm is bulling. Its entitlement. Its i dont like so no one gets to like it. Its a lets burn this beast to the ground mentality.

Again, I don't think you're looking at this from a fair perspective. You already said "_____ behavior is always OK when it's against _____ group" which is obviously a pretty slanted opinion. Nobody bullied Team Ninja into not releasing the game. Hell, very few people had even heard much about it before they said it wasn't coming to the West or Play-Asia's tweets.

As for the game itself, believe me that if this were actually a decent game then there wouldn't even be any discussion. Both previous games got 5s and 6s mostly on review sites and the entire franchise never broke 800k units worldwide. DOA5 alone (not counting all the other games in the franchise) sold 1.5 million copies worldwide so far and had 3.5 million downloads of the F2P version. So while the company is free to make whatever games they want, gamers were pretty clear about the fact that a bikini photo simulator combined with mediocre volleyball and a series of boring minigames isn't what people really want (and both these games came out before the term SJW was even coined so blaming poor sales of those versions on political correctness is silly).

My point is don't jump on the bandwagon for either side. A lot of people respond to any argument around this like Jerry MacGuire with "You had me at 'SJW'" without judging the merit of the individual situation. These games are not very good and sell like crap. DOA has all the boob physics of DOAX but there's acutally a halfway decent game underneath so it sells. The fact that nobody buys these games is why you aren't seeing them over here more than anything else.

-Byshop

Again, nobody claimed they did, so im not sure why you keep implying so. What does a game being bad have to do with anything? Who cares if its bad, if people want to buy it, they should be allowed to buy it. Its not illegal to release a bad DoAx3 game. Im sorry, but i will always jump on the side that supports peoples freedom to buy what they want. Im against boycotts and will never side with them. I have the power to not buy what i dont want. And again, you have no evidence they are not releasing because of poor sales when the game sells best in America. All the evidence points to SJWs trying to censor DoA 5 when it was coming out. This is nothing new, same shat different day.

Avatar image for JustPlainLucas
JustPlainLucas

80441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 226

User Lists: 0

#252 JustPlainLucas
Member since 2002 • 80441 Posts

@Byshop said:
@mesome713 said:
@Byshop said:
@mesome713 said:

@Byshop: It is bullying when you call others to boycott a company just because they disagree with you. Thats dirty. Thats censorship and entitlement. There business wont be hurt i can assure you this. Its will only improve their business. Nobody said TN is censoring, just that SJWs whine and try to censor and dictate others all the time. This is nothing new, they always do this bullying and trying to censor peoples work. Hence how they got their name SJWs.

rofl.

No, that's how every boycott in history has worked. That's literally what a boycott is. The difference here is that you don't agree with the reason for the boycott. That's a reason to not participate in it, but it's not a reason to call it dirty or bullying.

-Byshop

When you dont agree with someone, then disagree. Dont buy the product, but to try and bully a company into not releasing the product because you hope to hurt them financially and cause harm is bulling. Its entitlement. Its i dont like so no one gets to like it. Its a lets burn this beast to the ground mentality.

Nobody bullied Team Ninja into not releasing the game. Hell, very few people had even heard much about it before they said it wasn't coming to the West or Play-Asia's tweets.

I'm pretty sure TN actually wanted to pay Koei a million dollars to publish DOAX3 in the States. I could be wrong, but I don't think it was TN's decision, and it was Koei's announcement that it wasn't coming to the West that got people's ears perked up. Play-Asia just fanned the flames.

Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#253  Edited By Byshop  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 20504 Posts

@mesome713 said:
@Byshop said:
@mesome713 said:
@Byshop said:

rofl.

No, that's how every boycott in history has worked. That's literally what a boycott is. The difference here is that you don't agree with the reason for the boycott. That's a reason to not participate in it, but it's not a reason to call it dirty or bullying.

-Byshop

When you dont agree with someone, then disagree. Dont buy the product, but to try and bully a company into not releasing the product because you hope to hurt them financially and cause harm is bulling. Its entitlement. Its i dont like so no one gets to like it. Its a lets burn this beast to the ground mentality.

Again, I don't think you're looking at this from a fair perspective. You already said "_____ behavior is always OK when it's against _____ group" which is obviously a pretty slanted opinion. Nobody bullied Team Ninja into not releasing the game. Hell, very few people had even heard much about it before they said it wasn't coming to the West or Play-Asia's tweets.

As for the game itself, believe me that if this were actually a decent game then there wouldn't even be any discussion. Both previous games got 5s and 6s mostly on review sites and the entire franchise never broke 800k units worldwide. DOA5 alone (not counting all the other games in the franchise) sold 1.5 million copies worldwide so far and had 3.5 million downloads of the F2P version. So while the company is free to make whatever games they want, gamers were pretty clear about the fact that a bikini photo simulator combined with mediocre volleyball and a series of boring minigames isn't what people really want (and both these games came out before the term SJW was even coined so blaming poor sales of those versions on political correctness is silly).

My point is don't jump on the bandwagon for either side. A lot of people respond to any argument around this like Jerry MacGuire with "You had me at 'SJW'" without judging the merit of the individual situation. These games are not very good and sell like crap. DOA has all the boob physics of DOAX but there's acutally a halfway decent game underneath so it sells. The fact that nobody buys these games is why you aren't seeing them over here more than anything else.

-Byshop

Again, nobody claimed they did, so im not sure why you keep implying so. What does a game being bad have to do with anything? Who cares if its bad, if people want to buy it, they should be allowed to buy it. Its not illegal to release a bad DoAx3 game. Im sorry, but i will always jump on the side that supports peoples freedom to buy what they want. Im against boycotts and will never side with them. I have the power to not buy what i dont want. And again, you have no evidence they are not releasing because of poor sales when the game sells best in America. All the evidence points to SJWs trying to censor DoA 5 when it was coming out. This is nothing new, same shat different day.

Well, you literally said "but to try and bully a company into not releasing the product because you hope to hurt them financially and cause harm is bulling" so if you don't think that's the case you can hopefully understand why a reasonable person might think you do. That's an incredibly loaded statement, too. When you assign motive based on your own views you are strawmaning the other side. Boycotts like these are intended to effect change in the industry, not to cause individual harm like you suggest.

At the end of the day, a boycott is merely a suggestion. People don't participate in boycotts because they get "Killgrave-ed" by the person who suggested it, they do it because they agree with the idea. Freedom to choose, just like say you are for.

You're right that I don't have "proof" but the data is very compelling. Team Ninja has released nearly 30 games to date, many of them being installments in the DOA franchise. This series has sold worse than nearly every other franchise they have had (possibly excluding PSP/Vita/Arcade-Only games). Even Metroid Other M which caught a lot of flack as being the worst "Post-Prime" Metroid game still sold 1.34 million worldwide. Hyrule Warriors did more than 1 mill. Both previous games combined didn't even hit these numbers, and that's really underperforming for a DOA franchise game.

Yes, the previous installments sold better in North America (and I admit I was surprised to learn that when I looked it up), but bear in mind that the first game was an Xbox exclusive. The original Xbox sold 16 mil units in North America but only sold 2 million units in all of Asia and the Pacific region and Australia. I don't know how many original Xboxes sold in Japan specifically, but even if we round up and say (incorrectly) that all 2 million units were sold in Japan, that means that North America had 8 times the number of Xboxes as Japan (but in reality it's likely an even bigger gap). In spite of North American having somewhere from 8 to 16 times the number of Xboxes as Japan, the game only sold around twice as well in North America. Hell, probably every game released for the Xbox probably sold better in North America based on these numbers. That doesn't necessarily mean the game is more popular in the US. Compare that to Halo 1 where the game sold five times better in the US versus Japan.

The Xbox 360 sold 25 million units in North America versus 1.5 million in Japan specifically (based on the last wikipedia numbers). Nearly 17 times the number of units in North America, and in spite of that the game sold only around twice as many copies again. However, the total sales combined in all regions were less than half of the previous game so this game didn't do as well -anywhere-.

Sure, they could spend the money to release it in North America, but why bother? PS4s aren't region coded and the asian version has English text and menus. Releasing in a region, marketing, etc costs money. They can just release in Japan and let the die hards import it at no cost to them.

I'm not surprised they didn't release this in the US, I'm surprised they bothered to make another sequel at all. 250k units for DOAX2 worldwide probably means they took a bath on that game between development, physical distribution and marketing.

-Byshop

Avatar image for deactivated-58ce94803a170
deactivated-58ce94803a170

8822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#254  Edited By deactivated-58ce94803a170
Member since 2015 • 8822 Posts

@Byshop said:
@mesome713 said:
@Byshop said:
@mesome713 said:

When you dont agree with someone, then disagree. Dont buy the product, but to try and bully a company into not releasing the product because you hope to hurt them financially and cause harm is bulling. Its entitlement. Its i dont like so no one gets to like it. Its a lets burn this beast to the ground mentality.

Again, I don't think you're looking at this from a fair perspective. You already said "_____ behavior is always OK when it's against _____ group" which is obviously a pretty slanted opinion. Nobody bullied Team Ninja into not releasing the game. Hell, very few people had even heard much about it before they said it wasn't coming to the West or Play-Asia's tweets.

As for the game itself, believe me that if this were actually a decent game then there wouldn't even be any discussion. Both previous games got 5s and 6s mostly on review sites and the entire franchise never broke 800k units worldwide. DOA5 alone (not counting all the other games in the franchise) sold 1.5 million copies worldwide so far and had 3.5 million downloads of the F2P version. So while the company is free to make whatever games they want, gamers were pretty clear about the fact that a bikini photo simulator combined with mediocre volleyball and a series of boring minigames isn't what people really want (and both these games came out before the term SJW was even coined so blaming poor sales of those versions on political correctness is silly).

My point is don't jump on the bandwagon for either side. A lot of people respond to any argument around this like Jerry MacGuire with "You had me at 'SJW'" without judging the merit of the individual situation. These games are not very good and sell like crap. DOA has all the boob physics of DOAX but there's acutally a halfway decent game underneath so it sells. The fact that nobody buys these games is why you aren't seeing them over here more than anything else.

-Byshop

Again, nobody claimed they did, so im not sure why you keep implying so. What does a game being bad have to do with anything? Who cares if its bad, if people want to buy it, they should be allowed to buy it. Its not illegal to release a bad DoAx3 game. Im sorry, but i will always jump on the side that supports peoples freedom to buy what they want. Im against boycotts and will never side with them. I have the power to not buy what i dont want. And again, you have no evidence they are not releasing because of poor sales when the game sells best in America. All the evidence points to SJWs trying to censor DoA 5 when it was coming out. This is nothing new, same shat different day.

Well, you literally said "but to try and bully a company into not releasing the product because you hope to hurt them financially and cause harm is bulling" so if you don't think that's the case you can hopefully understand why a reasonable person might think you do. That's an incredibly loaded statement, too. When you assign motive based on your own views you are strawmaning the other side. Boycotts like these are intended to effect change in the industry, not to cause individual harm like you suggest.

At the end of the day, a boycott is merely a suggestion. People don't participate in boycotts because they get "Killgrave-ed" by the person who suggested it, they do it because they agree with the idea. Freedom to choose, just like say you are for.

You're right that I don't have "proof" but the data is very compelling. Team Ninja has released nearly 30 games to date, many of them being installments in the DOA franchise. This series has sold worse than nearly every other franchise they have had (possibly excluding PSP/Vita/Arcade-Only games). Even Metroid Other M which caught a lot of flack as being the worst "Post-Prime" Metroid game still sold 1.34 million worldwide. Hyrule Warriors did more than 1 mill. Both previous games combined didn't even hit these numbers, and that's really underperforming for a DOA franchise game.

Yes, the previous installments sold better in North America (and I admit I was surprised to learn that when I looked it up), but bear in mind that the first game was an Xbox exclusive. The original Xbox sold 16 mil units in North America but only sold 2 million units in all of Asia and the Pacific region and Australia. I don't know how many original Xboxes sold in Japan specifically, but even if we round up and say (incorrectly) that all 2 million units were sold in Japan, that means that North America had 8 times the number of Xboxes as Japan (but in reality it's likely an even bigger gap). In spite of North American having somewhere from 8 to 16 times the number of Xboxes as Japan, the game only sold around twice as well in North America. Hell, probably every game released for the Xbox probably sold better in North America based on these numbers. That doesn't necessarily mean the game is more popular in the US. Compare that to Halo 1 where the game sold five times better in the US versus Japan.

The Xbox 360 sold 25 million units in North America versus 1.5 million in Japan specifically (based on the last wikipedia numbers). Nearly 17 times the number of units in North America, and in spite of that the game sold only around twice as many copies again. However, the total sales combined in all regions were less than half of the previous game so this game didn't do as well -anywhere-.

Sure, they could spend the money to release it in North America, but why bother? PS4s aren't region coded and the asian version has English text and menus. Releasing in a region, marketing, etc costs money. They can just release in Japan and let the die hards import it at no cost to them.

I'm not surprised they didn't release this in the US, I'm surprised they bothered to make another sequel at all. 250k units for DOAX2 worldwide probably means they took a bath on that game between development, physical distribution and marketing.

-Byshop

You mean like you suggest its because of poor sales? Boycotts are meant to hurt the company. Yes, you do have the freedom to join the boycott or not, but that doesnt mean people arent bullied into it. Maybe they want to be a team player and dont want the SJWs to turn on them. These SJWs are psychos, they will eat each other and do it frequently. Just ask Ann Rice.

And my data is very compelling also, SJWs have attacked DoA before. Also imports cost more, so they could sell more copies by bringing it over to America. This is not some super expensive game to make, im sure they make their money back easily to produce more of them.

Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#255  Edited By Byshop  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 20504 Posts

@mesome713 said:

You mean like you suggest its because of poor sales? Boycotts are meant to hurt the company. Yes, you do have the freedom to join the boycott or not, but that doesnt mean people arent bullied into it. Maybe they want to be a team player and dont want the SJWs to turn on them. These SJWs are psychos, they will eat each other and do it frequently. Just ask Ann Rice.

And my data is very compelling also, SJWs have attacked DoA before. Also imports cost more, so they could sell more copies by bringing it over to America. This is not some super expensive game to make, im sure they make their money back easily to produce more of them.

But that doesn't mean people aren't bullied into it? Who's being bullied into a boycott, please?

I'm not hearing data from you, I'm hearing a ton of attacks and hyperbole. "SJWs are psychos" and they are (somehow) bullying people into joining their boycott. I'm sure that there probably have been feminists who had a problem with previous DOA games, but I guarantee you that even though the next inevitable installment of the DOA fighting franchise will have all of the jiggle physics, ass-slams, and barely existent swimsuit costumes as the previous games, it'll still get a worldwide release because there's an actual -game- there that people enjoy.

What the data shows is that T and A isn't enough to sell a video game alone, and since DOAX as a series has little going for it beyond that it sells very poorly everywhere it gets released. That gives me hope for the industry.

-Byshop

Avatar image for deactivated-58ce94803a170
deactivated-58ce94803a170

8822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#256  Edited By deactivated-58ce94803a170
Member since 2015 • 8822 Posts

@Byshop said:
@mesome713 said:
@Byshop said:
@mesome713 said:

Again, nobody claimed they did, so im not sure why you keep implying so. What does a game being bad have to do with anything? Who cares if its bad, if people want to buy it, they should be allowed to buy it. Its not illegal to release a bad DoAx3 game. Im sorry, but i will always jump on the side that supports peoples freedom to buy what they want. Im against boycotts and will never side with them. I have the power to not buy what i dont want. And again, you have no evidence they are not releasing because of poor sales when the game sells best in America. All the evidence points to SJWs trying to censor DoA 5 when it was coming out. This is nothing new, same shat different day.

Well, you literally said "but to try and bully a company into not releasing the product because you hope to hurt them financially and cause harm is bulling" so if you don't think that's the case you can hopefully understand why a reasonable person might think you do. That's an incredibly loaded statement, too. When you assign motive based on your own views you are strawmaning the other side. Boycotts like these are intended to effect change in the industry, not to cause individual harm like you suggest.

At the end of the day, a boycott is merely a suggestion. People don't participate in boycotts because they get "Killgrave-ed" by the person who suggested it, they do it because they agree with the idea. Freedom to choose, just like say you are for.

You're right that I don't have "proof" but the data is very compelling. Team Ninja has released nearly 30 games to date, many of them being installments in the DOA franchise. This series has sold worse than nearly every other franchise they have had (possibly excluding PSP/Vita/Arcade-Only games). Even Metroid Other M which caught a lot of flack as being the worst "Post-Prime" Metroid game still sold 1.34 million worldwide. Hyrule Warriors did more than 1 mill. Both previous games combined didn't even hit these numbers, and that's really underperforming for a DOA franchise game.

Yes, the previous installments sold better in North America (and I admit I was surprised to learn that when I looked it up), but bear in mind that the first game was an Xbox exclusive. The original Xbox sold 16 mil units in North America but only sold 2 million units in all of Asia and the Pacific region and Australia. I don't know how many original Xboxes sold in Japan specifically, but even if we round up and say (incorrectly) that all 2 million units were sold in Japan, that means that North America had 8 times the number of Xboxes as Japan (but in reality it's likely an even bigger gap). In spite of North American having somewhere from 8 to 16 times the number of Xboxes as Japan, the game only sold around twice as well in North America. Hell, probably every game released for the Xbox probably sold better in North America based on these numbers. That doesn't necessarily mean the game is more popular in the US. Compare that to Halo 1 where the game sold five times better in the US versus Japan.

The Xbox 360 sold 25 million units in North America versus 1.5 million in Japan specifically (based on the last wikipedia numbers). Nearly 17 times the number of units in North America, and in spite of that the game sold only around twice as many copies again. However, the total sales combined in all regions were less than half of the previous game so this game didn't do as well -anywhere-.

Sure, they could spend the money to release it in North America, but why bother? PS4s aren't region coded and the asian version has English text and menus. Releasing in a region, marketing, etc costs money. They can just release in Japan and let the die hards import it at no cost to them.

I'm not surprised they didn't release this in the US, I'm surprised they bothered to make another sequel at all. 250k units for DOAX2 worldwide probably means they took a bath on that game between development, physical distribution and marketing.

-Byshop

You mean like you suggest its because of poor sales? Boycotts are meant to hurt the company. Yes, you do have the freedom to join the boycott or not, but that doesnt mean people arent bullied into it. Maybe they want to be a team player and dont want the SJWs to turn on them. These SJWs are psychos, they will eat each other and do it frequently. Just ask Ann Rice.

And my data is very compelling also, SJWs have attacked DoA before. Also imports cost more, so they could sell more copies by bringing it over to America. This is not some super expensive game to make, im sure they make their money back easily to produce more of them.

But that doesn't mean people aren't bullied into it? Who's being bullied into a boycott, please?

I'm not hearing data from you, I'm hearing a ton of attacks and hyperbole. "SJWs are psychos" and they are (somehow) bullying people into joining their boycott. I'm sure that there probably have been feminists who had a problem with previous DOA games, but I guarantee you that even though the next inevitable installment of the DOA fighting franchise will have all of the jiggle physics, ass-slams, and barely existent swimsuit costumes as the previous games, it'll still get a worldwide release because there's an actual -game- there that people enjoy.

What the data shows is that T and A isn't enough to sell a video game alone, and since DOAX as a series has little going for it beyond that it sells very poorly everywhere it gets released. That gives me hope for the industry.

-Byshop

I wouldnt know, that would be up to them to come out. But it happens, its happened before and itll happen again. Just like people get bullied to go on strikes. We are not talking about feminist, we are talking about SJWs. Majority of feminist are pro to women exposing their bodies and dont mind cartoons/games doing it. When the next DoA game comes, they will try to cry wolf on it also most likely, its what they always do. And when have just boobs and arse ever been enough to sell a video game on its own? These games have always been very niche, its why they choose to attack them and hide from the bigger corporations.

Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#257  Edited By Byshop  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 20504 Posts

@mesome713 said:

I wouldnt know, that would be up to them to come out. But it happens, its happened before and itll happen again. Just like people get bullied to go on strikes. We are not talking about feminist, we are talking about SJWs. Majority of feminist are pro to women exposing their bodies and dont mind cartoons/games doing it. When the next DoA game comes, they will try to cry wolf on it also most likely, its what they always do. And when have just boobs and arse ever been enough to sell a video game on its on? These games have always been very niche, its why they choose to attack them and hide from the bigger corporations.

Yeah, an assumption is not data. It's pretty much the opposite of data.

-Byshop

Avatar image for deactivated-58ce94803a170
deactivated-58ce94803a170

8822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#258 deactivated-58ce94803a170
Member since 2015 • 8822 Posts

@Byshop said:
@mesome713 said:

I wouldnt know, that would be up to them to come out. But it happens, its happened before and itll happen again. Just like people get bullied to go on strikes. We are not talking about feminist, we are talking about SJWs. Majority of feminist are pro to women exposing their bodies and dont mind cartoons/games doing it. When the next DoA game comes, they will try to cry wolf on it also most likely, its what they always do. And when have just boobs and arse ever been enough to sell a video game on its on? These games have always been very niche, its why they choose to attack them and hide from the bigger corporations.

Yeah, an assumption is not data. It's pretty much the opposite of data.

-Byshop

I never claimed to have data on that, i have data that they attacked DoA 5 before.

Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#259 Byshop  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 20504 Posts

@mesome713 said:
@Byshop said:
@mesome713 said:

I wouldnt know, that would be up to them to come out. But it happens, its happened before and itll happen again. Just like people get bullied to go on strikes. We are not talking about feminist, we are talking about SJWs. Majority of feminist are pro to women exposing their bodies and dont mind cartoons/games doing it. When the next DoA game comes, they will try to cry wolf on it also most likely, its what they always do. And when have just boobs and arse ever been enough to sell a video game on its on? These games have always been very niche, its why they choose to attack them and hide from the bigger corporations.

Yeah, an assumption is not data. It's pretty much the opposite of data.

-Byshop

I never claimed to have data on that, i have data that they attacked DoA 5 before.

But you're throwing around accusation after accusation. There's really nothing here left to discuss because you're far more interested in railing against anyone you consider a SJW than talking about the game.

-Byshop

Avatar image for deactivated-58ce94803a170
deactivated-58ce94803a170

8822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#260  Edited By deactivated-58ce94803a170
Member since 2015 • 8822 Posts

@Byshop: Would seem that way. I havnt considered none a SJW, but nice accusation.

Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#261 Byshop  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 20504 Posts

@mesome713 said:

@Byshop: Would seem that way. I havnt considered none a SJW, but nice accusation.

I didn't say you accused someone in this thread of being a SJW specifically (at least I'm assuming that's what "I havent considered none a SJW" was supposed to mean), but you aren't really talking about the game or this issue. I'm not really interested in an "SJW" debate because frankly there is so much wrong with the idea that I wouldn't know where to begin.

-Byshop

Avatar image for deactivated-58ce94803a170
deactivated-58ce94803a170

8822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#262  Edited By deactivated-58ce94803a170
Member since 2015 • 8822 Posts

@Byshop: You stated i was rallying against anyone i considered a SJW. But i havnt considered anyone is what i meant. I use it as a general term for those that cry wolf on extremely minor subjects i disagree with. But yes, there is nothing to discuss about SJW, its just a made up term just like cry baby is.

Avatar image for rektmuhface
rektmuhface

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#263 rektmuhface
Member since 2015 • 455 Posts

I will reiterate...the fact that so many of you have such an issue with women speaking out against bogus games like this really speaks volumes on your social interactions with real women...or I should say lack there of. I'm not saying this game should be banned, and IT'S NOT, but what I'm saying is you people have an unwarranted personal vendetta against feminists. I mean this website IS home to all the immature maniacs who sent death threats to the GTAV reviewer.

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#264 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

@rektmuhface said:

I will reiterate...the fact that so many of you have such an issue with women speaking out against bogus games like this really speaks volumes on your social interactions with real women...or I should say lack there of. I'm not saying this game should be banned, and IT'S NOT, but what I'm saying is you people have an unwarranted personal vendetta against feminists. I mean this website IS home to all the immature maniacs who sent death threats to the GTAV reviewer.

lol
The only people I know who wanted to play this are women.

Avatar image for nyadc
NyaDC

8006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#265  Edited By NyaDC
Member since 2014 • 8006 Posts

@rektmuhface said:

I will reiterate...the fact that so many of you have such an issue with women speaking out against bogus games like this really speaks volumes on your social interactions with real women...or I should say lack there of. I'm not saying this game should be banned, and IT'S NOT, but what I'm saying is you people have an unwarranted personal vendetta against feminists. I mean this website IS home to all the immature maniacs who sent death threats to the GTAV reviewer.

My girlfriend said feminists are idiots and the people who are are trying to boycott the release of this game are a bunch of whiny keyboard warriors.

Girls don't even agree with this shit, it's just an isolated bunch of insane people who act overly sensitive and want things their way or they cry...

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#266  Edited By KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

@nyadc said:
@rektmuhface said:

I will reiterate...the fact that so many of you have such an issue with women speaking out against bogus games like this really speaks volumes on your social interactions with real women...or I should say lack there of. I'm not saying this game should be banned, and IT'S NOT, but what I'm saying is you people have an unwarranted personal vendetta against feminists. I mean this website IS home to all the immature maniacs who sent death threats to the GTAV reviewer.

My girlfriend said feminists are idiots and the people who are are trying to boycott the release of this game are a bunch of whiny keyboard warriors.

Girls don't even agree with this shit, it's just an isolated bunch of insane people who act overly sensitive and want things their way or they cry...

Problem is there are also feminists who are actually equalists and not manhaters on energy drinks. But yeah I can't say the lack of popularity is unwarranted. Some are carrying the banner of equalism now, which seems like a good (is it?) idea? I don't like getting all P.C. (ugh) but it's a less offensive term and it might hamper the extremists. A little.

Avatar image for xdude85
xdude85

6559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#267 xdude85
Member since 2006 • 6559 Posts

Holy shit, this thread turned into a session of the McLaughlin Group really fast.

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#268 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

@rektmuhface said:

I will reiterate...the fact that so many of you have such an issue with women speaking out against bogus games like this really speaks volumes on your social interactions with real women...or I should say lack there of. I'm not saying this game should be banned, and IT'S NOT, but what I'm saying is you people have an unwarranted personal vendetta against feminists. I mean this website IS home to all the immature maniacs who sent death threats to the GTAV reviewer.

And let's not point out the hypocrisy here. It's a-okay to do everything in our power to send a message that the feminists and SJW's suck, including buying shit that we don't want just to encourage companies to do things that the SJW's hate.

But if an SJW starts a boycott, "that's bullying people and stopping free speech! If you don't like it, just don't like it and then shut up about it! Not like me, of course. I get to encourage people to support my point of view because I'm right, but you need to shut up and just silently be mad all the time!"

And again...that is not expressing support or lack of support of "SJW's". That has NOTHING to do with whether or not I think the SJW's are wrong or right. But it is absolutely stupid as shit to try to frame this as an issue of censorship and freedom of speech when one side is saying that things that are fine for them are off-limits to dissenters. What's good for the goose is good for the fucking gander. If it's okay to buy a game solely to send a message that the feminists and SJW's suck and have no power, then it's EQUALLY fair game for those feminists and SJW's to organize a boycott for ANYTHING that they don't like.

Thta's how freedom of speech works. But apparently, some people think that freedom of speech only applies to people who they agree with.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#269 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

@mesome713 said:

When you dont agree with someone, then disagree. Dont buy the product

That's all a boycott is...

You disagree with what a company is doing so you decide to not buy their products until they improve. What's your issue with that?

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#270 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts
@nyadc said:
@rektmuhface said:

I will reiterate...the fact that so many of you have such an issue with women speaking out against bogus games like this really speaks volumes on your social interactions with real women...or I should say lack there of. I'm not saying this game should be banned, and IT'S NOT, but what I'm saying is you people have an unwarranted personal vendetta against feminists. I mean this website IS home to all the immature maniacs who sent death threats to the GTAV reviewer.

My girlfriend said feminists are idiots and the people who are are trying to boycott the release of this game are a bunch of whiny keyboard warriors.

Girls don't even agree with this shit, it's just an isolated bunch of insane people who act overly sensitive and want things their way or they cry...

Who is boycotting the release of this game. I think I've asked this question multiple times around here, and I still haven't gotten an answer. I haven't seen any vocal protest groups or rallies against this game.

If anyone is overly sensitive, it's you. You are somehow convinced that feminists are trying to keep this sexy beach volleyball game from releasing in the west. You're complaining about absolutely nothing. There is no evidence to support that narrative.

Avatar image for nyadc
NyaDC

8006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#271 NyaDC
Member since 2014 • 8006 Posts

@JangoWuzHere said:
@nyadc said:
@rektmuhface said:

I will reiterate...the fact that so many of you have such an issue with women speaking out against bogus games like this really speaks volumes on your social interactions with real women...or I should say lack there of. I'm not saying this game should be banned, and IT'S NOT, but what I'm saying is you people have an unwarranted personal vendetta against feminists. I mean this website IS home to all the immature maniacs who sent death threats to the GTAV reviewer.

My girlfriend said feminists are idiots and the people who are are trying to boycott the release of this game are a bunch of whiny keyboard warriors.

Girls don't even agree with this shit, it's just an isolated bunch of insane people who act overly sensitive and want things their way or they cry...

Who is boycotting the release of this game. I think I've asked this question multiple times around here, and I still haven't gotten an answer. I haven't seen any vocal protest groups or rallies against this game.

If anyone is overly sensitive, it's you. You are somehow convinced that feminists are trying to keep this sexy beach volleyball game from releasing in the west. You're complaining about absolutely nothing. There is no evidence to support that narrative.

Yeah... Except all of the SJW's freaking out on Play-Asia about bringing this game to the West, how it's disgusting and they're never going to buy from them again etc... They're boycotting the game itself being made available here via the outlet who is actually providing it...

No evidence, pfft lol... Take a hike..

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#272  Edited By JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

@nyadc said:
@JangoWuzHere said:
@nyadc said:
@rektmuhface said:

I will reiterate...the fact that so many of you have such an issue with women speaking out against bogus games like this really speaks volumes on your social interactions with real women...or I should say lack there of. I'm not saying this game should be banned, and IT'S NOT, but what I'm saying is you people have an unwarranted personal vendetta against feminists. I mean this website IS home to all the immature maniacs who sent death threats to the GTAV reviewer.

My girlfriend said feminists are idiots and the people who are are trying to boycott the release of this game are a bunch of whiny keyboard warriors.

Girls don't even agree with this shit, it's just an isolated bunch of insane people who act overly sensitive and want things their way or they cry...

Who is boycotting the release of this game. I think I've asked this question multiple times around here, and I still haven't gotten an answer. I haven't seen any vocal protest groups or rallies against this game.

If anyone is overly sensitive, it's you. You are somehow convinced that feminists are trying to keep this sexy beach volleyball game from releasing in the west. You're complaining about absolutely nothing. There is no evidence to support that narrative.

Yeah... Except all of the SJW's freaking out on Play-Asia about bringing this game to the West, how it's disgusting and they're never going to buy from them again etc... They're boycotting the game itself being made available here via the outlet who is actually providing it...

No evidence, pfft lol... Take a hike..

You're making up your own lame narrative.

People were complaining about Play-Asia's venomous tweets. They were "boycotting" Play-Asia. NONE of it had anything to do with the actual release of DOAX3. The only way that you could draw that conclusion is through some bullshit conspiracy theory and pure ignorance.

Avatar image for deactivated-58ce94803a170
deactivated-58ce94803a170

8822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#273  Edited By deactivated-58ce94803a170
Member since 2015 • 8822 Posts

@toast_burner said:
@mesome713 said:

When you dont agree with someone, then disagree. Dont buy the product

That's all a boycott is...

You disagree with what a company is doing so you decide to not buy their products until they improve. What's your issue with that?

Its more then that though, your campaigning against the company as a whole, but yeah, its close to the same, just with more bulling involved and a bunch of other stuff.

Avatar image for Dire_Weasel
Dire_Weasel

16681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#274 Dire_Weasel
Member since 2002 • 16681 Posts

ITT: @mesome173 goes to war against an imaginary global boycott by "SJWs" that have somehow prevented a shit game from being released in North America.

Keep fighting the good fight, buddy.

Avatar image for deactivated-58ce94803a170
deactivated-58ce94803a170

8822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#275  Edited By deactivated-58ce94803a170
Member since 2015 • 8822 Posts

@Dire_Weasel said:

ITT: @mesome173 goes to war against an imaginary global boycott by "SJWs" that have somehow prevented a shit game from being released in North America.

Keep fighting the good fight, buddy.

Keep telling yourself that, maybe it will come true. But then again, maybe ill turn into a Kirby and start dancing with unicorns.