Does 360 deserves its sucess in America?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for xsatyr86
xsatyr86

601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 xsatyr86
Member since 2010 • 601 Posts

[QUOTE="xsatyr86"]

[QUOTE="omho88"] Based on the analogy the PS2 should be selling infinitively, right?omho88

The analogy is for current gen though. PS2 games have alreay been played by most gamers. There are still people who have not bought into this gen so earlier games for 360 and ps3matter to them. Plz stop being so dense.

This is my 2nd post regarding the analogy, how could I be suddenly so dense?!

If you honeslty think the ps2 should keep selling based on that analogy then I would say you are dense. It has the best library for consoles but the games have pretty much been played by everyone, there are not many consumers left who have not played those games.

Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

It came out first, it was cheaper than the ps3. People bought it, then their friends buy it cause their friend had already bought it. End of story.

Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts
It gave me entertainment and I'm guessing others so yes I'd say that it deserves it.
Avatar image for Urworstnhtmare
Urworstnhtmare

2630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#54 Urworstnhtmare
Member since 2008 • 2630 Posts

[QUOTE="omho88"][QUOTE="xsatyr86"]

The analogy is for current gen though. PS2 games have alreay been played by most gamers. There are still people who have not bought into this gen so earlier games for 360 and ps3matter to them. Plz stop being so dense.

xsatyr86

This is my 2nd post regarding the analogy, how could I be suddenly so dense?!

If you honeslty think the ps2 should keep selling based on that analogy then I would say you are dense. It has the best library for consoles but the games have pretty much been played by everyone, there are not many consumers left who have not played those games.

Well tell that to consumers... Its still selling...

Avatar image for Urworstnhtmare
Urworstnhtmare

2630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#55 Urworstnhtmare
Member since 2008 • 2630 Posts

It came out first, it was cheaper than the ps3. People bought it, then their friends buy it cause their friend had already bought it. End of story.

GreyFoXX4

This is all there is too it. Literally...

Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts
From the business point of view, of course. From my personal point of view it lacks too many features compared to the PS3, as well as games compared to PC. Not to mention, the console will become obsolete hardware 2 years from now, so I would say that it is not worth it.
Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

I don't think it does.

Hardware having a 33% (or whatever) does not deserve success.

However I would say that Americans deserve the 360.

Avatar image for dommeus
dommeus

9433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#58 dommeus
Member since 2004 • 9433 Posts

Im curious what you guys think. 360 seems to of really caught on in America, despite having less features and exclusives than PS3. What could it be that attracts American gamer to 360 and what do you think Sony should do to become big with U.S. again. I personally think 360 is riding the coat tails of the sheep effect. There are more reasons to own a PS3 than 360 when they are compared on paper. MS needs to announce some kickass exclusive games because I don't get what U.S. is seeing in 360 as of now. Its like going with just a cup of water and passing up a meal and a cup of water:| Thoughts?

1Stark1

In the grand scheme of things exclusives don't really matter unless they are system sellers. I know in System Wars they are the only thing that matters, but unfortunately real life is a little different.

Reasons the 360 is big in America:

1) Halo

2) MS is a US company (well, perhaps not).

3) Released first, and CoD 2 was a launch game.

4) Promotes CoD as if it was an exclusive franchise.

5) Cheaper than the PS3 (and yes it might be a worse deal overall but at the end of the day you can play nearly every game with a cheaper 360).

6) Americans perhaps on average have more disposable income than other nationalities (this is a massive assumption, and I know that the divide between rich and poor is disgustingly wide).

By they way it is also very popular in the UK.

Avatar image for Sir_Graham
Sir_Graham

3983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#59 Sir_Graham
Member since 2002 • 3983 Posts
There are a couple of reasons it did so well in the US. It launched first, the price range was not too high, the controller is great for FPS and it's game library was clearly superior to it's console compeition early on in the generation.
Avatar image for Badosh
Badosh

12774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#60 Badosh
Member since 2011 • 12774 Posts
[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Sure it does. It has one of the most impressive libraries there have ever been on a console.

Do you really believe that -_- You're entitled to your opinion, but how old are you?

Why does it matter how old s/he is? If they want to say it's the best, then it is to them. Move on.
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#61 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="charizard1605"]Short answer, yes, yes it does. It's an excellent console, and it deserves all the success that it's getting.1Stark1

It is a good console no doubt, but what makes it deserve to top PS3 in U.S.? It has less exclusive franchiss, a last gen disc player, and its AAA games has much less variety than PS3s does.

People don't only buy AA games. Overall, the 360 has just as much variety as the PS3.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#62 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

Two games have defined the Xbox in the U.S., Halo and Call of Duty.

NeonNinja

You forgot Gears of War.

Avatar image for xsatyr86
xsatyr86

601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 xsatyr86
Member since 2010 • 601 Posts

[QUOTE="xsatyr86"]

[QUOTE="omho88"] This is my 2nd post regarding the analogy, how could I be suddenly so dense?!Urworstnhtmare

If you honeslty think the ps2 should keep selling based on that analogy then I would say you are dense. It has the best library for consoles but the games have pretty much been played by everyone, there are not many consumers left who have not played those games.

Well tell that to consumers... Its still selling...

omho88 was saying based on the analogy it should be the best seller, I never said it was not selling at all. Reading comprehension much?

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45671 Posts

Sure it does and then some.

The real travesty is Japan seemingly unwilling to support a game console from a company who has it's headquarters in the U.S. :evil:

Avatar image for ManicAce
ManicAce

3267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#65 ManicAce
Member since 2009 • 3267 Posts

You have to remember that for a long time PS3 was overpriced, suffered from inferior multiplats and a lack of exclusives. 360 was the natural choice and it snowballed from there. PS3 might have caught up, but 360 is still cheaper and plays most of the same games. American company also knows how to market it to americans.

Avatar image for KevinPlanet
KevinPlanet

941

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 KevinPlanet
Member since 2003 • 941 Posts

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

[QUOTE="charizard1605"]Short answer, yes, yes it does. It's an excellent console, and it deserves all the success that it's getting.charizard1605

It is a good console no doubt, but what makes it deserve to top PS3 in U.S.? It has less exclusive franchiss, a last gen disc player, and its AAA games has much less variety than PS3s does.

You need to understand, to most people, exclusives don't matter at all. What matters is the overall strength of the library, and the 360 has that nailed. Combine XBLA titles, and you've got an unstoppable force right there. Also, most people don't care that it doesn't have Blu Ray- individual Blu Ray players can be had for less than $100 now, and the 360 has Netflix for high definition movie watching anyway. One last thing that the 360 has is perception- brands like Call of Duty, Assassin's Creed, Halo, Gears of War- on other words, the biggest brands this generation- are all perceived to be synonymous with the Xbox brand, meaning that to the average consumer, the Xbox is effectively the only place to play those games. Also, the Xbox has Xbox LIVE. THAT is the Xbox 360's biggest exclusive,

Assassin's Creed is associated with Playstation..and the reason people are buying Xbox 360's more in America is for one reason, it comes in cheaper varieties than the PS3.

No one is buying an Xbox 360 because of Xbox Live or XBLA games. Word of mouth and bombastic advertising is whats keeping the system afloat in the United States. All Sony has to do is give the PS3 a Kinect like advertising campaign and I'm sure they'd sell a lot more systems. But Sony doesn't like to spend more than they are making on the system.

I however do agree that the PS3 has a much better stride than the 360, its managed to aquire mostly all of the 360's past 3rd party exclusive retail games (now multiplatform) and its exclusive retail library seems to be increasing each week with 8.5 and above rated games, while the 360 seems to be relying on only 3 major franchises (Gears of War, Halo and Fable) which is great for Microsoft but terrible for consumers who want more games to choose from.

Avatar image for EmperorSupreme
EmperorSupreme

7686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#67 EmperorSupreme
Member since 2006 • 7686 Posts

It came out first, it was cheaper than the ps3. People bought it, then their friends buy it cause their friend had already bought it. End of story.

GreyFoXX4

I think it's this too and 360 has pretty much always had an upfront price advantage. A lot of shoppers don't shop for value as much as they do price especially with the economy the way it is. They would rather pay a lower price for the system, maybe pick up a seperate blu-ray player a year later, pay an extra $50 a year, than pay an extra $100 upfront. It's kind've sad they spend so much more over the life of the system but a lot of people don't have the extra money upfront right now.

Avatar image for Sir_Graham
Sir_Graham

3983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#68 Sir_Graham
Member since 2002 • 3983 Posts
[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"]

It came out first, it was cheaper than the ps3. People bought it, then their friends buy it cause their friend had already bought it. End of story.

EmperorSupreme
I think it's this too and 360 has pretty much always had an upfront price advantage. A lot of shoppers don't shop for value as much as they do price especially with the economy the way it is. They would rather pay a lower price for the system, maybe pick up a seperate blu-ray player a year later, pay an extra $50 a year, than pay an extra $100 upfront. It's kind've sad they spend so much more over the life of the system for a lower unit, but a lot of people don't have the extra money upfront right now.

That's true for many people but you also have the choice of not spending money on the extras at all. I use my PC for online gaming and I doubt consoles will ever be able to win me over in that department. However they are good for rentals, fighting, racing, JRPGs and a couple of other things they do well. Back when the PS3 was $600 (or $1000 here in Australia) there was no way I was going to buy it. The difference was the price of a good new video card and the decision for me at that time was easy. I was planning on making the PS3 my first console this gen until they announced the price at E3. If it wasn't for that I probably wouldn't have given the 360 a look at all.
Avatar image for KevinPlanet
KevinPlanet

941

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 KevinPlanet
Member since 2003 • 941 Posts

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

[QUOTE="charizard1605"]Short answer, yes, yes it does. It's an excellent console, and it deserves all the success that it's getting.Phazevariance

It is a good console no doubt, but what makes it deserve to top PS3 in U.S.? It has less exclusive franchiss, a last gen disc player, and its AAA games has much less variety than PS3s does.

It has less exclusives but most multiplatform games run better on it than the PS3, and there are WAY more multiplatform games than exclusives, and i mean WAY more! Also, you say it lacks features from the PS3... XBL and cross game chat do exist. Then theres Kinect, which although doesn't have any 'hardcore games' yet, is still selling amazing. It deserves it all.

My question to you is, what makes you think Sony should be on top, and what would MS have to do to beat PS3 in Asia?

Casual gamers do not know or care which platform runs multiplatforms better. If they did they'd buy a suped up PC. Kinect is a gimmicky product that is selling based on a successful and massive ad campaign, casual gamers saw these ads and wanted to buy it just because of what they thought it could do. There will never be a Half-Life 2 or a GTA 4 on that thing...its not selling because of its games but on hype.

And the PS2 was the less powerful machine and yet some multiplats sold better (and ran worse) on the PS2 than on the Xbox, care to explain why?...

Sony should be on top because they were forced by Microsoft and Nintendo into lowering the price of the PS3, they did that and now the system is $299 the same price as a 250 GB model of an Xbox 360. I'd be hopeful in thinking consumers would be able to see there is more value in buying a PS3 than a 360 and he games also seem to have a much more broad appeal

-LittleBigPlanet 1 & 2

-Uncharted 1 & 2

-God of War 1, 2 and 3

-Metal Gear Solid 4

-Multiplatform games

Whereas Microsoft seems to rely on pumping out Halo's, attaching their brand logo to 3rd party games passing them off as exclusive, and now with Kinect they're doing the same thing only relying on word of mouth and commercials to sell the device rather than a great library of launch titles

If this is not apparent to you yet, look at the last few press conferences from Microsoft concerning the Xbox 360, all they've done is hype up their sales numbers...and only till GDC did we at least get some Microsoft published XBLA games...

Avatar image for bryn8150
bryn8150

795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 bryn8150
Member since 2004 • 795 Posts

YES...END OF STORY.

time and time again Xbox 360 has survived its haters, its own Mis steps and nay-sayers and delivered the goods. sure, we havent always agreed with their business strategy from time to time, but thats why they are selling Billions of dollars in software in hardware and were writing about them.

MS and 360 have owned this generation. its just time for the haters to acknowledge this and move on to more happy and productive lives.

PS3 has time and time again fired ALL of their shots across the xbox 360 bow and it has amounted to Nothing....PS Move, a Plethora of Exclusives that dont sell, its all meant nothing.

when a Call of Duty map pack on 360 sells more copies in 24 hours than 1 PS3 exclusive does in 24 months you know as a company that you have the competition by the throat!

MS had all their ducks lined up this gen just like the legendary PS2 did last gen. despite all the 360 hate posts and Sonys best efforts the 360 juggernaut keeps rolling.

let the haters hate.

Avatar image for bryn8150
bryn8150

795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 bryn8150
Member since 2004 • 795 Posts

Exclusives aren't as system selling as they used to be.

outatime557
Word!
Avatar image for Urworstnhtmare
Urworstnhtmare

2630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#73 Urworstnhtmare
Member since 2008 • 2630 Posts

MS and 360 have owned this generation.

bryn8150

Nintendo and Wii say Hi.

Seriously though, Playstation was late to the party....

Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

YES...END OF STORY.

time and time again Xbox 360 has survived its haters, its own Mis steps and nay-sayers and delivered the goods. sure, we havent always agreed with their business strategy from time to time, but thats why they are selling Billions of dollars in software in hardware and were writing about them.

MS and 360 have owned this generation. its just time for the haters to acknowledge this and move on to more happy and productive lives.

PS3 has time and time again fired ALL of their shots across the xbox 360 bow and it has amounted to Nothing....PS Move, a Plethora of Exclusives that dont sell, its all meant nothing.

when a Call of Duty map pack on 360 sells more copies in 24 hours than 1 PS3 exclusive does in 24 months you know as a company that you have the competition by the throat!

MS had all their ducks lined up this gen just like the legendary PS2 did last gen. despite all the 360 hate posts and Sonys best efforts the 360 juggernaut keeps rolling.

let the haters hate.

bryn8150

LOL, you act as if all 360 exclusives sell well. Also, last time I checked PS3 outsold 360 in 2010. 360 isnt doing as well as youre making it seem.

Avatar image for Samox
Samox

890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Samox
Member since 2004 • 890 Posts

Yes, in my opinion it very much does- for reasons already explained in this thread numerous times.

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
Of course. It has a terrific library, great features, nice pricing and has been marketed very well.
Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#77 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38071 Posts
TC, for you there are more reasons to own a ps3. But the single most important reason to own a console will never be logical to everyone. It is personal preference. I own both, but do prefer the 360. Simply because I like its presentation, online, and the fact that it is from an American company. Maybe you cant understand that, but I cant understand why some people think they will ever understand why others have a different preference.
Avatar image for taterfrickintot
taterfrickintot

2851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#78 taterfrickintot
Member since 2008 • 2851 Posts
Short answer, yes, yes it does. It's an excellent console, and it deserves all the success that it's getting.charizard1605
this. only a fanboy would disagree. i also think the PS3 is getting a lot more well deserved recognition.
Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
It launched a year earlier and PS3 launched at $600 with a bloody awful launch line up, theres your answer.
Avatar image for bryn8150
bryn8150

795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 bryn8150
Member since 2004 • 795 Posts

[QUOTE="bryn8150"]

YES...END OF STORY.

time and time again Xbox 360 has survived its haters, its own Mis steps and nay-sayers and delivered the goods. sure, we havent always agreed with their business strategy from time to time, but thats why they are selling Billions of dollars in software in hardware and were writing about them.

MS and 360 have owned this generation. its just time for the haters to acknowledge this and move on to more happy and productive lives.

PS3 has time and time again fired ALL of their shots across the xbox 360 bow and it has amounted to Nothing....PS Move, a Plethora of Exclusives that dont sell, its all meant nothing.

when a Call of Duty map pack on 360 sells more copies in 24 hours than 1 PS3 exclusive does in 24 months you know as a company that you have the competition by the throat!

MS had all their ducks lined up this gen just like the legendary PS2 did last gen. despite all the 360 hate posts and Sonys best efforts the 360 juggernaut keeps rolling.

let the haters hate.

1Stark1

LOL, you act as if all 360 exclusives sell well. Also, last time I checked PS3 outsold 360 in 2010. 360 isnt doing as well as youre making it seem.

double LOL,....Links or it didnt happen. heres mine Link http://www.strategyinformer.com/news/11292/killzone-3-sales-disappointing Link http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/33463/NPD_Results_February_2011_Industry_Up_3_Percent_Black_Ops_Maintains_Top_Spot.php link http://www.informationweek.com/news/windows/microsoft_news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=229300784&cid=RSSfeed_IWK_All let the hater-aide drinking commence.
Avatar image for todd2r
todd2r

2615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 todd2r
Member since 2009 • 2615 Posts

Im curious what you guys think. 360 seems to of really caught on in America, despite having less features and exclusives than PS3. What could it be that attracts American gamer to 360 and what do you think Sony should do to become big with U.S. again. I personally think 360 is riding the coat tails of the sheep effect. There are more reasons to own a PS3 than 360 when they are compared on paper. MS needs to announce some kickass exclusive games because I don't get what U.S. is seeing in 360 as of now. Its like going with just a cup of water and passing up a meal and a cup of water:| Thoughts?

1Stark1

of course it deserves its success. you wanna know why? cause they didnt charge gamers 600 bucks for a freaking system when it was released.

Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#82 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

Yep. It's a great console with a great library of games. :)

Avatar image for BuryMe
BuryMe

22017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 104

User Lists: 0

#83 BuryMe
Member since 2004 • 22017 Posts

Sure it does. MS has managed to secure a great lineup for it.

Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

Yeah. The 360 is great.

Avatar image for jlevin860
jlevin860

818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 jlevin860
Member since 2009 • 818 Posts

Im curious what you guys think. 360 seems to of really caught on in America, despite having less features and exclusives than PS3. What could it be that attracts American gamer to 360 and what do you think Sony should do to become big with U.S. again. I personally think 360 is riding the coat tails of the sheep effect. There are more reasons to own a PS3 than 360 when they are compared on paper. MS needs to announce some kickass exclusive games because I don't get what U.S. is seeing in 360 as of now. Its like going with just a cup of water and passing up a meal and a cup of water:| Thoughts?

1Stark1

1. it came out first, most people bought it first.

2. the xbox revolutionalized online gaming. the first xbox started it, but the 360 made online gaming the standard. (take that with a grain of salt, because it has led to developers abusing dlc)

3. the ps3 is a great system. i actually wish all my friends would quit the xbox train and switch, but thats not gonna happen, so thats why i dont own a ps3 anymore. i prefer gaming with my friends, and they all have xboxes.

4. if they announce zone of the enders 3 or any kind of mgs 1-4 bundle for ps3, well, lets just say i'll switch to the dark side =]

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29844 Posts

How can people say 360 deserves its success when MS doesn't want to compete when it comes to exclusives:? You guys can say it doesn't matter but don't you guys want exclusives for your machine. I know i want exclusives for my 360. I haven't seen a reason to play it since Alan Wake. I just can't make excuses for companies that ditch its core audience to cater to people that dont really play games. Even Nintendo is delivering the exclusive hard core games. MS has more money, yet they choose to fund a huge campaign for kinect over getting awesome exclusives. If Sony did the same thing, i would bad mouth them as well.

1Stark1

It seems as if you've already formed your own view on the matter, and don't seem to be listening to dissenting opinion. The 360 deserves its success because it has a lot of great games. Additionally, its two flagship franchises, Gears and Halo, are sales monsters. And while I've enjoyed the exclusives on the 360, PS3, and Wii, they're certainly not the be all, end all to me. Most of my favorite games this gen are multiplats. I also prefer XBL to PSN. Its all personal preference.

Avatar image for ArchaoN
ArchaoN

831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 ArchaoN
Member since 2003 • 831 Posts
Yes it does. Do you realize that the PS2 was carried by GTA3 being exclusive for most of last gen? What is soo special about the PS3? You realize that the Wii is the #1 system and has less features than both the 360 and the PS3, right?
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29844 Posts

[QUOTE="vashkey"]Why ask if you wont accept any answer other than "it doesn't".1Stark1

I expressed my opinion and I don't have a problem with others expressing theirs in this thread.

By saying something like "How can people say 360 deserves its success" suggests an unwillingness to accept that some people might have different preferences than you.

Avatar image for lazerface216
lazerface216

7564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 lazerface216
Member since 2008 • 7564 Posts

It launched a year earlier and PS3 launched at $600 with a bloody awful launch line up, theres your answer.blue_hazy_basic

yep, the way sony came out of the gate ensured doom for the first couple of years. it's now finally catching its wind but it may be too little too late for sony this gen.

Avatar image for headninjadog
headninjadog

743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 headninjadog
Member since 2005 • 743 Posts
Did it ever dawn on anyone that all three consoles are successful? In the age of online connected consoles and there media features bringing in other sources of revenue you don't have to be number 1 anymore to win.
Avatar image for coltgames
coltgames

2120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#92 coltgames
Member since 2009 • 2120 Posts

i guess i still dont really care about it, not downing it tho

Avatar image for nervmeister
nervmeister

15377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 nervmeister
Member since 2005 • 15377 Posts

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

Im curious what you guys think. 360 seems to of really caught on in America, despite having less features and exclusives than PS3. What could it be that attracts American gamer to 360 and what do you think Sony should do to become big with U.S. again. I personally think 360 is riding the coat tails of the sheep effect. There are more reasons to own a PS3 than 360 when they are compared on paper. MS needs to announce some kickass exclusive games because I don't get what U.S. is seeing in 360 as of now. Its like going with just a cup of water and passing up a meal and a cup of water:| Thoughts?

todd2r

of course it deserves its success. you wanna know why? cause they didnt charge gamers 600 bucks for a freaking system when it was released.

No. Instead, MS played it "clever" and decided to charge them $60 a month for XBL. It's brilliant really. If you bill customers over the long run instead of all at once. You can get em to pay up even MORE money total without them noticing just how much they've poured in. And for that, strictly from a business perspective, I kind of have to give MS credit.
Avatar image for fadersdream
fadersdream

3154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#94 fadersdream
Member since 2006 • 3154 Posts

[QUOTE="NeonNinja"]

Two games have defined the Xbox in the U.S., Halo and Call of Duty.

heretrix

You forgot Gears of War.

he also forgot mass effect.
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts

No. Instead, MS played it "clever" and decided to charge them $60 a *year* for XBL. It's brilliant really. If you bill customers over the long run instead of all at once.You can get em to pay up even MORE money total without them noticing just how much they've poured in. And for that, strictly from a business perspective, I kind of have to give MS credit.nervmeister

I'm pretty sure most Live subscribers are well aware of how much they have spent on Live by now, it's not like 60 * #years subscribed isa complicated or uncommon calculation.

Avatar image for johnnyblazed88
johnnyblazed88

4240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 johnnyblazed88
Member since 2008 • 4240 Posts

exclusives arent that big of deal when theres tons of good multiplats

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="bryn8150"]

YES...END OF STORY.

time and time again Xbox 360 has survived its haters, its own Mis steps and nay-sayers and delivered the goods. sure, we havent always agreed with their business strategy from time to time, but thats why they are selling Billions of dollars in software in hardware and were writing about them.

MS and 360 have owned this generation. its just time for the haters to acknowledge this and move on to more happy and productive lives.

PS3 has time and time again fired ALL of their shots across the xbox 360 bow and it has amounted to Nothing....PS Move, a Plethora of Exclusives that dont sell, its all meant nothing.

when a Call of Duty map pack on 360 sells more copies in 24 hours than 1 PS3 exclusive does in 24 months you know as a company that you have the competition by the throat!

MS had all their ducks lined up this gen just like the legendary PS2 did last gen. despite all the 360 hate posts and Sonys best efforts the 360 juggernaut keeps rolling.

let the haters hate.

1Stark1

LOL, you act as if all 360 exclusives sell well. Also, last time I checked PS3 outsold 360 in 2010. 360 isnt doing as well as youre making it seem.

compared to ps3 exclusives most 360 exclusives do sell well.

Avatar image for johnnyblazed88
johnnyblazed88

4240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 johnnyblazed88
Member since 2008 • 4240 Posts

Yes it does. Do you realize that the PS2 was carried by GTA3 being exclusive for most of last gen? What is soo special about the PS3? You realize that the Wii is the #1 system and has less features than both the 360 and the PS3, right?ArchaoN

PS2 was carried by alot of 3rd party games being exclusive

Avatar image for TheOwnerOner
TheOwnerOner

2921

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 TheOwnerOner
Member since 2007 • 2921 Posts
I think it deserves more success elsewhere
Avatar image for ralphikari
ralphikari

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 ralphikari
Member since 2006 • 752 Posts

Does the Wii? iPad? Call of Duty? Final Fantasy? or Facebook? I have little interest in any of these, but I simply accept myself as non-mainstream rather than question their deservedness. If the majority of people choosea product or service, the provider has given them what they want and has done something extraordinarily right commercially.

My only criticism of the 360 is the stability of the early versions. I travel a lot and have 4 360's in different apartments. My launch Xenon RROD'ed in the 3rd year and MS fixed it within a week. My Halo edition Zephyr E-74'ed last year and MS gave me a brand new one in 3 days. The Falcon has shown no sign of trouble in the past 3 years doubling as a media player. The Slim works flawlessly except when you get too much grease on the capacitive switch.

I saved about $50 on each console from promotions and sales. The 360 has most of the games I want and the rest are PC exclusives like Civ V, Total Wars, and Starcraft 2 anyway so there is not much I can complain.