@m3dude1: Let someone know to put you on suicide watch if Drive Club flops... don't want someone killing themselves over a game they hyped beyond levels of Destiny.
Haha, good gameplay, lol, it drives the same on a different kind of road, not sure if you ever drove a car, because you sound like a 14-year old, but this is not how a car responds to a change of terrain.
Watched some HQ vids today, Slow Robert, such a gorgeous game with proper high octane racing going on. Can't wait to get my teeth into this.
Don't worry, one day the Shitbox Done will get a game worth turning around in bed for. In 2017. Maybe.
@m3dude1: Let someone know to put you on suicide watch if Drive Club flops... don't want someone killing themselves over a game they hyped beyond levels of Destiny.
ummmm how can a game i dont expect to be fun flop? its simply another title that absolutely embarrasses the best the pc has to offer technically
@Desmonic: Take your avatar for instance yes she has a big ass but I'm sure if you would need more than a pretty face and big ass right? What if her breathe stank? Thats what DriveClub is .....a pretty face woman big tits, big ass, and with ass stanking breathe, cant cook and bad sex.......but hey she look good tho right?
Lems claiming the standard strawman argument that Cows were saying this would be GOAT or AAAA because Forza Horizon 2 shows some weaknesses in its own right.
Special shout out to the lem that posted a picture with an obvious blur box going into the right wall in the center of a bullshot for calling people out for bullshit. That was the most entertainment to be had in this thread besides the sweet videos in OP.
The car you control is not touching the road at all. You can clearly see the clipping of the indy car tires. Theres not even a tire track in heavy rain. After a year of delay, why would anyone excuse that? They had one job.
Well all they have is a mulit plat while SONY enjoys the true Exclusive.
A lot of console gamers spend the full $60 dollars. The steam sales are a double edged sword. PC gamers know they are coming, they know prices drop, but that isn't always the best thing in the grand scheme of things.
smashes every other racing game to a pulp. the lighting and shading looks so damn natural. not sure what aliasing people are on about, the IQ is better than what you can achieve in virtually any modern pc game that doesnt support txaa without resorting to spending ridiculous amts of money on multi gpu setups to brute force high levels of downsampling
Keep telling yourself that buddy.
This is from Gamersydes Chile - Ferrari F430 video
Here's a video using the same car on the same track in Chile.
Loading Video...
Is that a joke? Drive Club looks so much better. That isn't even comparable.
The game is impressive in some areas and unimpressive in other areas. The forum is to discuss.
@scottpsfan14 said:
LOL. System Wars is just Anti NeoGAF. Is there a balanced site that exists on the net? You are calling the game unimpressive now? Jesus Christ.
Are you saying the game is perfect? I dont see anything wrong with people pointing out what they think of a game they have waited a year to purchase.
It's not the most physically accurate car game ever. If you want that, go and play some PC Sim that will most likely have shit graphics. But then having accurate physics alone just isn't enough to hype up on SW is it? Has to have the visuals first.
The game seems to be missing any form of AA. And for me, that is the biggest problem. It's counteracting the detail they put into it.
Watch Project Cars get nothing but praise, regardless of many visual effects being far inferior to DriveClub or FH2. It will be hyped by SW as "the best visuals in a car game" simply because it's on PC. If that was only to be released on consoles, no one would talk about it on here. Those hermit goggles are fucking thick.
Now you talk about gameplay? I've only heard great things about it with the latest builds. FH2 doesn't exactly have super accurate physics. But then it doesn't have to. Have you played NFS Rivals? It's unrealistic as hell, but a lot of fun when you're playing. But DriveClub and FH2 still have far better physics than that game.
But as always, cherrypicked flaws is all that will ever be talked about on SW. But you know, it happens both ways. Like the crowd with FH2. But that was only cows. No one else joined in, rather they called cows "pathetic" or "sad". With DriveClub, it's a full on massacre consisting of lems, hermits and unbiased posters, all bashing DriveClub and cows.
I'll tell you why DC is getting the shit kicked out of it. The reason is the delay. If this game came out on launch, it would of seen maybe a month or two in the limelight before being put aside like KZ did but since it was delayed by a year no less and its been hyped to the heavens by Cows, Gamersyde comes along with direct feed video and guess what, it looks sub-par. For a game that had an extra year in development I expect so much more. The tracks are bland, pretty landscapes but the tracks are boring and lifeless. The cars again although highly detailed look like they are floating on the track. The sound of the tires on the road is shit. For a game that has so much said about its visuals its extremely inconsistent.
@Desmonic: Lems DCing a racing game when The One has the two best racing games of the generation???????? Keep reaching. PatchClub will be lucky to score a 6 here on GSpot.
what?? lucky to score a 6?? #lol now dats something i will sig bet on. deal?
i bet drive club with score higher than 6, if it doesnt then my sig for 1 month will be whatever kuu2 chooses it to be, barring of course inappropriate content that could get be banned, it will have to be moderator approved we can ask char or super
The game is impressive in some areas and unimpressive in other areas. The forum is to discuss.
@scottpsfan14 said:
LOL. System Wars is just Anti NeoGAF. Is there a balanced site that exists on the net? You are calling the game unimpressive now? Jesus Christ.
Are you saying the game is perfect? I dont see anything wrong with people pointing out what they think of a game they have waited a year to purchase.
It's not the most physically accurate car game ever. If you want that, go and play some PC Sim that will most likely have shit graphics. But then having accurate physics alone just isn't enough to hype up on SW is it? Has to have the visuals first.
The game seems to be missing any form of AA. And for me, that is the biggest problem. It's counteracting the detail they put into it.
Watch Project Cars get nothing but praise, regardless of many visual effects being far inferior to DriveClub or FH2. It will be hyped by SW as "the best visuals in a car game" simply because it's on PC. If that was only to be released on consoles, no one would talk about it on here. Those hermit goggles are fucking thick.
Now you talk about gameplay? I've only heard great things about it with the latest builds. FH2 doesn't exactly have super accurate physics. But then it doesn't have to. Have you played NFS Rivals? It's unrealistic as hell, but a lot of fun when you're playing. But DriveClub and FH2 still have far better physics than that game.
But as always, cherrypicked flaws is all that will ever be talked about on SW. But you know, it happens both ways. Like the crowd with FH2. But that was only cows. No one else joined in, rather they called cows "pathetic" or "sad". With DriveClub, it's a full on massacre consisting of lems, hermits and unbiased posters, all bashing DriveClub and cows.
I'll tell you why DC is getting the shit kicked out of it. The reason is the delay. If this game came out on launch, it would of seen maybe a month or two in the limelight before being put aside like KZ did but since it was delayed by a year no less and its been hyped to the heavens by Cows, Gamersyde comes along with direct feed video and guess what, it looks sub-par. For a game that had an extra year in development I expect so much more. The tracks are bland, pretty landscapes but the tracks are boring and lifeless. The cars again although highly detailed look like they are floating on the track. The sound of the tires on the road is shit. For a game that has so much said about its visuals its extremely inconsistent.
Tell me, what are the flaws you notice? It is still the best looking racer out there with by far the best technology in use. Look at beyond3D about it. They say the opposite to you fanboys. Sub par? How so? I literally see the exact same detail as the prior released videos. If you think you know, then tell me what's different. Truth is you just don't have a clue. Please, by all means, show me undeniable proof that has no explanation apart from "downgrade".
Go watch some of these videos then go watch some the PR videos. Tell me you don't see a difference.
@Desmonic: Lems DCing a racing game when The One has the two best racing games of the generation???????? Keep reaching. PatchClub will be lucky to score a 6 here on GSpot.
what?? lucky to score a 6?? #lol now dats something i will sig bet on. deal?
i bet drive club with score higher than 6, if it doesnt then my sig for 1 month will be whatever kuu2 chooses it to be, barring of course inappropriate content that could get be banned, it will have to be moderator approved we can ask char or super
Sounds good to me Ghost. Always up for some sig bet fun. I actually think it will score a 7 but the bet will be for 6 or below for me and 7 or above for you.
The game is impressive in some areas and unimpressive in other areas. The forum is to discuss.
@scottpsfan14 said:
LOL. System Wars is just Anti NeoGAF. Is there a balanced site that exists on the net? You are calling the game unimpressive now? Jesus Christ.
Are you saying the game is perfect? I dont see anything wrong with people pointing out what they think of a game they have waited a year to purchase.
It's not the most physically accurate car game ever. If you want that, go and play some PC Sim that will most likely have shit graphics. But then having accurate physics alone just isn't enough to hype up on SW is it? Has to have the visuals first.
The game seems to be missing any form of AA. And for me, that is the biggest problem. It's counteracting the detail they put into it.
Watch Project Cars get nothing but praise, regardless of many visual effects being far inferior to DriveClub or FH2. It will be hyped by SW as "the best visuals in a car game" simply because it's on PC. If that was only to be released on consoles, no one would talk about it on here. Those hermit goggles are fucking thick.
Now you talk about gameplay? I've only heard great things about it with the latest builds. FH2 doesn't exactly have super accurate physics. But then it doesn't have to. Have you played NFS Rivals? It's unrealistic as hell, but a lot of fun when you're playing. But DriveClub and FH2 still have far better physics than that game.
But as always, cherrypicked flaws is all that will ever be talked about on SW. But you know, it happens both ways. Like the crowd with FH2. But that was only cows. No one else joined in, rather they called cows "pathetic" or "sad". With DriveClub, it's a full on massacre consisting of lems, hermits and unbiased posters, all bashing DriveClub and cows.
I'll tell you why DC is getting the shit kicked out of it. The reason is the delay. If this game came out on launch, it would of seen maybe a month or two in the limelight before being put aside like KZ did but since it was delayed by a year no less and its been hyped to the heavens by Cows, Gamersyde comes along with direct feed video and guess what, it looks sub-par. For a game that had an extra year in development I expect so much more. The tracks are bland, pretty landscapes but the tracks are boring and lifeless. The cars again although highly detailed look like they are floating on the track. The sound of the tires on the road is shit. For a game that has so much said about its visuals its extremely inconsistent.
Tell me, what are the flaws you notice? It is still the best looking racer out there with by far the best technology in use. Look at beyond3D about it. They say the opposite to you fanboys. Sub par? How so? I literally see the exact same detail as the prior released videos. If you think you know, then tell me what's different. Truth is you just don't have a clue. Please, by all means, show me undeniable proof that has no explanation apart from "downgrade".
Go watch some of these videos then go watch some the PR videos. Tell me you don't see a difference.
Yes. I see aliasing. You think the car looks floaty because the shadow is situated at the front. I bet if you leave the time of day for a while, the shadow will start appearing. Just like in real life. I also notice that a lot of people on here are screen capping the videos and pointing out flaws on a video that clearly has compression artifacts. The detailed environment, lighting, car models, particles in the wind, all look as good as what has been shown. Tell you what doesn't? The textures and the motion blur effect. Know why? Because video compression tends to do that. Those studio released videos lacked compression artifacts because they could. Now I kind of knew that aliasing would be present since farearlier direct feed videos had the same aliasing. But they looked phenomenal regardless. You are probably blindly assuming detail has been cut because compression is literally breaking up the motion as you're watching it. Unless you can prove otherwise with clear images.
I know how compression works and I'll wait until I get my hands on the PSN+ release before I decide if I'm going to buy it or not. I personally feel that there is a large disconnect between what the devs have shown vs these direct feed videos from the likes of Gamersyde. Using still images to prove things is a useless endevour currently as the only true screenshots we have are from the devs themselves. Everything else has been screencapped from those direct feed videos which have compression in them.
But its more than just visuals. Yes they are impressive but for a game that has an extra year of dev time, I wanted more. The crowds are bland, 2D cut-outs. The track textures vary greatly with some increablely detailed roads to some very lackluster roadside objects. I wouldn't of been bothered by it if it was all consistent. The GT series had one thing in common across the entire series. The high level of detail on the cars at the cost of everything else. Because the tracks were so bland in comparison it was easy to look past that because it was all the same. DriveClub jumps from one end of the spectum to the other making it difficult to get immersed. The same can be said for RAGE. The game had some wonderful visuals only to be brought crashing back to earth when you saw a shitty res'd rock.
The game is impressive in some areas and unimpressive in other areas. The forum is to discuss.
@scottpsfan14 said:
LOL. System Wars is just Anti NeoGAF. Is there a balanced site that exists on the net? You are calling the game unimpressive now? Jesus Christ.
Are you saying the game is perfect? I dont see anything wrong with people pointing out what they think of a game they have waited a year to purchase.
It's not the most physically accurate car game ever. If you want that, go and play some PC Sim that will most likely have shit graphics. But then having accurate physics alone just isn't enough to hype up on SW is it? Has to have the visuals first.
The game seems to be missing any form of AA. And for me, that is the biggest problem. It's counteracting the detail they put into it.
Watch Project Cars get nothing but praise, regardless of many visual effects being far inferior to DriveClub or FH2. It will be hyped by SW as "the best visuals in a car game" simply because it's on PC. If that was only to be released on consoles, no one would talk about it on here. Those hermit goggles are fucking thick.
Now you talk about gameplay? I've only heard great things about it with the latest builds. FH2 doesn't exactly have super accurate physics. But then it doesn't have to. Have you played NFS Rivals? It's unrealistic as hell, but a lot of fun when you're playing. But DriveClub and FH2 still have far better physics than that game.
But as always, cherrypicked flaws is all that will ever be talked about on SW. But you know, it happens both ways. Like the crowd with FH2. But that was only cows. No one else joined in, rather they called cows "pathetic" or "sad". With DriveClub, it's a full on massacre consisting of lems, hermits and unbiased posters, all bashing DriveClub and cows.
Project Cars deserves praise if it is an authentic game running at 60fps. I only have one issue with drive club at the moment, the float factor. The third person view is just disappointing. You spend a majority of the time staring at the two rear tires, and they dont even look like they are touching the road. Im sorry but this is a driving game. Tires rolling over a track is supposed to be what the entire game is built around, unless we are talking about F-Zero.
Lems claiming the standard strawman argument that Cows were saying this would be GOAT or AAAA because Forza Horizon 2 shows some weaknesses in its own right.
Both sides claim hollow victory.
Rinse repeat.
Pretty sure I haven't seen a single user here make the claim that Cows stated this would be GOAT or AAAA. What has been occurring is that cows realize that Drive Club isn't going to be anywhere near FH2's level of quality so the only thing they can do is wank the graphics which is the only thing the game does outstanding, despite the draw distance and invisible walls.
I know how compression works and I'll wait until I get my hands on the PSN+ release before I decide if I'm going to buy it or not. I personally feel that there is a large disconnect between what the devs have shown vs these direct feed videos from the likes of Gamersyde. Using still images to prove things is a useless endevour currently as the only true screenshots we have are from the devs themselves. Everything else has been screencapped from those direct feed videos which have compression in them.
But its more than just visuals. Yes they are impressive but for a game that has an extra year of dev time, I wanted more. The crowds are bland, 2D cut-outs. The track textures vary greatly with some increablely detailed roads to some very lackluster roadside objects. I wouldn't of been bothered by it if it was all consistent. The GT series had one thing in common across the entire series. The high level of detail on the cars at the cost of everything else. Because the tracks were so bland in comparison it was easy to look past that because it was all the same. DriveClub jumps from one end of the spectum to the other making it difficult to get immersed. The same can be said for RAGE. The game had some wonderful visuals only to be brought crashing back to earth when you saw a shitty res'd rock.
PR Video
Direct Feed
Same track. Now lets be real adults here. The differences between those two videos is AA and compression. I will bet £100 that the same track on release will look just like the PR video down to every single detail except anti aliasing. Also 2D crouds? Has anybody gotten the chance to look at them closely? If so, show me screens that are very close up like the FH2 shot lglz trolled with. Now again, texture work. On a compressed video. Compare the textures to that PR vid and the direct feed, I'm sure the PR vid will come out on top because the signal isn't being tared up by a million compression artifacts.
Wait until you have the game in your PS4 before you make judgements based on compressed videos. Imagine if people done that to hermits, saying an exclusive of theirs has shit textures because of compression. People would call that out straight away. You know, the typical comments like "Oh right, so using a compressed video against real gameplay. Cow logic".
I think you are all making shit up to get up cows grills, that's what I think. It's a shame not many cows on here have the common sense to actually defend their games either. You are looking for flaws in a compressed video Clyde. #rekt
Whatever you say brah. You're making the case for not comparing compressed videos vs real gameplay etc yet all your cow buddies are doing the same in that FH2 thread.... I have already said I knew they were compressed and I would make my final judgement when I saw the game running on my own PS4.
smashes every other racing game to a pulp. the lighting and shading looks so damn natural. not sure what aliasing people are on about, the IQ is better than what you can achieve in virtually any modern pc game that doesnt support txaa without resorting to spending ridiculous amts of money on multi gpu setups to brute force high levels of downsampling
Keep telling yourself that buddy.
This is from Gamersydes Chile - Ferrari F430 video
Here's a video using the same car on the same track in Chile.
Loading Video...
Is that a joke? Drive Club looks so much better. That isn't even comparable.
There both from DC....
wtf? So which one is legit? Is this another GT5 stunt sony is pulling?
Log in to comment