Good-Bye Nintendo

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#351 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45531 Posts
[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]I posted a lengthy response in the GUFU thread, so here I'll just say that you make some great points and I agree for the most part. Nintendo is still making the games that will please the Nintendo fanbase, but its quite clear they've given up on regaining the market base they lost back in the N64 era. It would also seem to me that theyr'e putting the Nintendo fans at a lower priority in favor of Wii-Fit, but its up to them to decide thats good enough. Personally I was a big Nintendo fan last generation, but the Wii has never been a console I felt I could support. With this last E3 conference, I've received confirmation that Nintendo isn't going to try to get me back.

Nintendo, I say farewell to you.
subrosian


They will be missed, eh Teuf? They gave us some good times...

And anyone hating on this - you *do not* understand how long I've been with Nintendo, or how much support (financially and otherwise) I've given them over the years. This is the second year in a row they've said a big "**** you" to hardcore gamers, it is getting old.

.... a job and a family doesn't mean that your not lazy... the stress of a family... both mentally and physically... there's a reason why america is the fattest country in the world... and i don't think gamers are disproving that

jaminnbn


First of all, Pacific Island countries make up some of the fatest countries in the world, due partially to a reliance on imported foods, and partially to genetics. Last time I checked, the US was at #9. Secondly, the obsiety crisis has everything to do with fast food - a massive intake of transfat, saturated fat, and sugar is not good *for anyone*. I'm 5'10" and 140lbs. Being a hardcore gamer has nothing to do with my weight - when I want excerise I do *crazy* things like mountain biking and going to the gym *shrug*... I know, I know, I'm a madman.

I'm not fat because I don't eat fast food or drink soda.

In fact, if you want to go in this direction, I highly suggest you actually *watch* yesterday's conference. Reggie certainly proves your point about non-gamers being "healthier", eh? Of course Miyamoto's "good excuse" was absolutely priceless (actually - it is true, BMI is a poor indicator of overall health, and a body builder or athlete would have a high BMI despite being healthy, hence why having the Wii Fitness pad test bodyfat would have made more sense... however Reggie is egg shaped, so, anyway...)




E3 has shrunk. It was a game show last year, it's a press confrence now.

And this thread should've only lasted 150 post, it's some guy's opinion instead you get like 300 posts of "I agree" which add nothing whatsoever. And 100 of 3,842 paragraphed posts...

Eponique


No offense Eponique, but I think you're afraid that what's being said here is true. I've been getting PMs from the most diehard Nintendo fans here who agree, at least in part, and want to refute specific points. The bottom line is, what I've said expresses a general feeling shared by many people on this forum.

Even if a lot of people here might disagree on one specific point or another, the sense that Nintendo really no longer cares about hardcore gamers (though they'd be more than happy for us to give them our money) is quite clear. I see posts that are essentially "No! It's not true! This isn't real! This can't be happening! You're wrong!" - I however, do not see any evidence.

Nintendo has, on more than one occasion in the past two years, made it crystal clear that their core gamer is no longer their concern. Telling us these are "gamers for everyone" is simply marketing - I apologize for not buying the bull**** - if you want to drink Nintendo's kool-aid that's your choice.

Indeed - nailed it again ! You sir are on a roll and it's challenging the highly sensitive fans that are fanboys but dont know it - you have much support as this thread is a testimony to that fact !
Avatar image for BloatWare
BloatWare

97

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#352 BloatWare
Member since 2007 • 97 Posts


The backlash over what Nintendo did at E3 2007 is, and will continue to be - huge.subrosian

You know the industry isat an odd transition point when at E3 Nintendo's (the company we all grew up loving)big-game announcement is.... exercise.

It's a shame, it really is.

Avatar image for Eponique
Eponique

17918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#353 Eponique
Member since 2007 • 17918 Posts
[QUOTE="Eponique"]

Heh, I'm pretty sure I've listed 14 so-called "hardcore" games just 30 minutes ago. And also bragged about how WiiFit doesn't mean it's the end of the world...

subrosian



I'll let you know when a Mario soccer game is considered "hardcore" - okay Eponique? I know it is your fondest wish that the Nintendo protesters, ex-Nintendo fans, concerned gamers, and hardcore gamers of the world be silenced - but that isn't going to happen.

The backlash over what Nintendo did at E3 2007 is, and will continue to be - huge. It was a definitive moment that made it crystal clear to many people that the things Nintendo has been saying over the past few months are *real*. Nintendo is going in the direction of the "non-gamer" for real, and they may never come back.

Take it out, it's 13 now.

I know what you mean, it's all about E3. Everyone is avoiding the new Mario Galaxy and Metroid Prime trailers like they've never avoided a huge thread before.

Avatar image for magiciandude
magiciandude

9667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#354 magiciandude
Member since 2004 • 9667 Posts
The truth is to me, is that all three have been disappointing. In fact, this gen has been the most disappointing in the history of modern gaming. I going to go ahead and stick with last gen gaming and getgames I missed out. Until then, I have no carefor this gen.
Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#355 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

Also, whats all this 'good bye nintendo' and 'farewell old friend' stuff going on.

I hope people realize there release of new interactive games will just boast wii sales even more.

Nintendo arent going anyway.

hyruledweller


I never said Nintendo was going out of business, that they were going bankrupt, or that they were "going away". What I said is, Nintendo has we have known them is dead. ****c Nintendo is gone - long gone. Their focus on the non-gamer segment over the core market is clear - and for many of us, as they were a company we grew up with, this is a harsh reality to accept.

So yes, we are saying good-bye to an old friend. If you were not there with us during the era when Nintendo was producing games that defined the core genres, I am truly sorry that you missed out on that wonderful era of gaming.
Avatar image for Tsug_Ze_Wind
Tsug_Ze_Wind

9511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#356 Tsug_Ze_Wind
Member since 2006 • 9511 Posts

Indeed - nailed it again ! You sir are on a roll and it's challenging the highly sensitive fans that are fanboys but dont know it - you have much support as this thread is a testimony to that fact !SecretPolice

*gag* Go start a fan club, why don't you.

And I know I'm a fanboy, thank you very much.

Avatar image for Dualshockin
Dualshockin

7826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#357 Dualshockin
Member since 2006 • 7826 Posts
Very well written post TC. I said this months ago,sales for the Wii are good for Nintendo,bad for us gamers.When I heard that they're now making future titles more accessible to the "new" market,and that they're now making games with the mindset of "even a newcomer can defeat an old timer",I knew that this was it for them. The biggest problem with Nintendo is they promised us new games,they promised us Online,they promised us,a revolution. So far,they have not delivered.
Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#358 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

Once again, you're assuming that "games for everyone" is impossible. As I said before, the only thing in the way is elitism. Which you've shown aplenty.

Tsug_Ze_Wind


It's elitism if someone doesn't want to play a fitness game or a Mario game? Since when does having a certain taste in games translate into "elitism"? I don't play RPG's, is that because I'm "elitist"??? No wonder you had that nonsense about GUFU in your sig before...
Avatar image for mangobear
mangobear

1392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#359 mangobear
Member since 2006 • 1392 Posts

Wow, that was a great post TC, thumbs up :D

Is it just me, or have nintendo fans also lowered their standards significantly in the past year? Dewy's adventure, mario soccer.. are these the hardcore game that really please you guys? :(

Avatar image for Eponique
Eponique

17918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#360 Eponique
Member since 2007 • 17918 Posts

Wow, that was a great post TC, thumbs up :D

Is it just me, or have nintendo fans also lowered their standards significantly in the past year? Dewy's adventure, mario soccer.. are these the hardcore game that really please you guys? :(

mangobear

I'm guessing you know nothing whatsoever about them. So yes, we are hyping these games, just like how you're hyping Killzone 2 to the moon :)

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#361 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"] Indeed - nailed it again ! You sir are on a roll and it's challenging the highly sensitive fans that are fanboys but dont know it - you have much support as this thread is a testimony to that fact !Tsug_Ze_Wind

*gag* Go start a fan club, why don't you.

And I know I'm a fanboy, thank you very much.



Ah, your signature makes a great deal more sense now. GUFU doesn't admit *fanboys*.


[QUOTE="subrosian"][QUOTE="Eponique"]

Heh, I'm pretty sure I've listed 14 so-called "hardcore" games just 30 minutes ago. And also bragged about how WiiFit doesn't mean it's the end of the world...

Eponique



I'll let you know when a Mario soccer game is considered "hardcore" - okay Eponique? I know it is your fondest wish that the Nintendo protesters, ex-Nintendo fans, concerned gamers, and hardcore gamers of the world be silenced - but that isn't going to happen.

The backlash over what Nintendo did at E3 2007 is, and will continue to be - huge. It was a definitive moment that made it crystal clear to many people that the things Nintendo has been saying over the past few months are *real*. Nintendo is going in the direction of the "non-gamer" for real, and they may never come back.

Take it out, it's 13 now.

I know what you mean, it's all about E3. Everyone is avoiding the new Mario Galaxy and Metroid Prime trailers like they've never avoided a huge thread before.



I'm not getting into a game by game arguement with you, the degradation that has occured in your list is frankly painful. Batallion Wars, Dewy's Adventure, Trauma Center, Mario Strikers, Crystal Chronicles, Mario Galaxy, and Zack & Wiki are not considered by most to be hardcore titles.

It is quite obvious you are a Nintendo fan and that you feel they have met your needs as a gamer, that is fine, I do not, and many people here DO NOT feel that Nintendo has met their needs as a gamer.

If you are unable to see the other side of the coin, if you are unable to see that this is about more than you, about more than E3, and about the direction Nintendo is going in - how they have rejected longtime gamers in favors of a new "non-gamer" audience, I kindly ask you to stop harassing people.

There is a viewpoint here that many people share - as shocking, and I'm sure discomforting as it is for you to accept - there are many longtime gamers who are upset about what Nintendo has been doing. Nintendo's E3 2007 press conference was a definitive moment that many of us have gathered around to say "y'know, it has gone too far".
Avatar image for Impex
Impex

5532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#362 Impex
Member since 2005 • 5532 Posts
Certainly is an eye opener. I'm certain I will not buy a Wii. That was decided after seeing what types of games are coming out, and the direction Nintendo went. I whole heartedly agree with your post (TC). Nintendo is definately taking their idea of gaming down a different path. However, that being said, I will support the DS, because I think this has a mixture of casual like games, and games for older Nintendo fans.
Avatar image for SambaLele
SambaLele

5552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#363 SambaLele
Member since 2004 • 5552 Posts

Very well written post TC. I said this months ago,sales for the Wii are good for Nintendo,bad for us gamers.When I heard that they're now making future titles more accessible to the "new" market,and that they're now making games with the mindset of "even a newcomer can defeat an old timer",I knew that this was it for them. The biggest problem with Nintendo is they promised us new games,they promised us Online,they promised us,a revolution. So far,they have not delivered.Dualshockin

:lol:

i'll translate what nintendo said there: "we are focusing on developing games that take much more luck and button mashing to win, instead of skill. Skill is not next-gen."

Avatar image for Tsug_Ze_Wind
Tsug_Ze_Wind

9511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#364 Tsug_Ze_Wind
Member since 2006 • 9511 Posts
[QUOTE="Tsug_Ze_Wind"]

Once again, you're assuming that "games for everyone" is impossible. As I said before, the only thing in the way is elitism. Which you've shown aplenty.

Teufelhuhn



It's elitism if someone doesn't want to play a fitness game or a Mario game? Since when does having a certain taste in games translate into "elitism"? I don't play RPG's, is that because I'm "elitist"??? No wonder you had that nonsense about GUFU in your sig before...

Did I say any of that? No, I didn't. The refusal to play a game that someone not completely devoted to gaming can play- that is elitism, and you can't spin it any other way.

And yes, most of GUFU is elitist, and cowardly. Why do you need a GUFU board? Why can't you all be with the rest of us? Why do most of you speak of us as filth?

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#365 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts
[QUOTE="mangobear"]

Wow, that was a great post TC, thumbs up :D

Is it just me, or have nintendo fans also lowered their standards significantly in the past year? Dewy's adventure, mario soccer.. are these the hardcore game that really please you guys? :(

Eponique

I'm guessing you know nothing whatsoever about them. So yes, we are hyping these games, just like how you're hyping Killzone 2 to the moon :)



Yes, Killzone 2 hype is ridiculous, however, after Sony's conferences (both 2005 which was fake, and 2007 which was real) if you cannot see *why* people would want to hype a title like Killzone 2, and why a title like Dewy's Adventure is considered, for lack of a better word, a complete waste, I think you're going to find this thread impossible to understand.

Thankfully, most gamers disagree with you, if you believe Dewy's Adventure > Killzone 2, I will not be the one who has to tell you why you're wrong, the dozens of other people who share my sentiments will be more than happy to do it for me.
Avatar image for jujutheking
jujutheking

2998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#366 jujutheking
Member since 2006 • 2998 Posts
I think ninty is using gms has like another divsion.Juast like Sony has tvs and movies and MS has cpus.Remember ninty is only a gamering company, but it's like they have other divsion.wiiifit,nintendogs,wiisports are ll for the familyl.Theyu are trying to make gms for everyone, but they do forget about the hardcore gamers too.They didn't update there console that much which will lead to basically the same gms.For example, go look at MP3 AI they freaking Halo 2 ai where they just jump from side to side(Watch the press confernce and MP3.It looks like thrash.
Avatar image for Eponique
Eponique

17918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#367 Eponique
Member since 2007 • 17918 Posts
[QUOTE="Tsug_Ze_Wind"]

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"] Indeed - nailed it again ! You sir are on a roll and it's challenging the highly sensitive fans that are fanboys but dont know it - you have much support as this thread is a testimony to that fact !subrosian

*gag* Go start a fan club, why don't you.

And I know I'm a fanboy, thank you very much.



Ah, your signature makes a great deal more sense now. GUFU doesn't admit *fanboys*.


[QUOTE="subrosian"][QUOTE="Eponique"]

Heh, I'm pretty sure I've listed 14 so-called "hardcore" games just 30 minutes ago. And also bragged about how WiiFit doesn't mean it's the end of the world...

Eponique



I'll let you know when a Mario soccer game is considered "hardcore" - okay Eponique? I know it is your fondest wish that the Nintendo protesters, ex-Nintendo fans, concerned gamers, and hardcore gamers of the world be silenced - but that isn't going to happen.

The backlash over what Nintendo did at E3 2007 is, and will continue to be - huge. It was a definitive moment that made it crystal clear to many people that the things Nintendo has been saying over the past few months are *real*. Nintendo is going in the direction of the "non-gamer" for real, and they may never come back.

Take it out, it's 13 now.

I know what you mean, it's all about E3. Everyone is avoiding the new Mario Galaxy and Metroid Prime trailers like they've never avoided a huge thread before.



I'm not getting into a game by game arguement with you, the degradation that has occured in your list is frankly painful. Batallion Wars, Dewy's Adventure, Trauma Center, Mario Strikers, Crystal Chronicles, Mario Galaxy, and Zack & Wiki are not considered by most to be hardcore titles.

It is quite obvious you are a Nintendo fan and that you feel they have met your needs as a gamer, that is fine, I do not, and many people here DO NOT feel that Nintendo has met their needs as a gamer.

If you are unable to see the other side of the coin, if you are unable to see that this is about more than you, about more than E3, and about the direction Nintendo is going in - how they have rejected longtime gamers in favors of a new "non-gamer" audience, I kindly ask you to stop harassing people.

There is a viewpoint here that many people share - as shocking, and I'm sure discomforting as it is for you to accept - there are many longtime gamers who are upset about what Nintendo has been doing. Nintendo's E3 2007 press conference was a definitive moment that many of us have gathered around to say "y'know, it has gone too far".

They're not hardcore because you say so? :|

I reallly don't know why I'm still replying to this this topic... The DS is a prime example of being for everyone. And the Wii can do it too.

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#368 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts
[QUOTE="Tsug_Ze_Wind"]

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"] Indeed - nailed it again ! You sir are on a roll and it's challenging the highly sensitive fans that are fanboys but dont know it - you have much support as this thread is a testimony to that fact !subrosian

*gag* Go start a fan club, why don't you.

And I know I'm a fanboy, thank you very much.



Ah, your signature makes a great deal more sense now. GUFU doesn't admit *fanboys*.


[QUOTE="subrosian"][QUOTE="Eponique"]

Heh, I'm pretty sure I've listed 14 so-called "hardcore" games just 30 minutes ago. And also bragged about how WiiFit doesn't mean it's the end of the world...

Eponique



I'll let you know when a Mario soccer game is considered "hardcore" - okay Eponique? I know it is your fondest wish that the Nintendo protesters, ex-Nintendo fans, concerned gamers, and hardcore gamers of the world be silenced - but that isn't going to happen.

The backlash over what Nintendo did at E3 2007 is, and will continue to be - huge. It was a definitive moment that made it crystal clear to many people that the things Nintendo has been saying over the past few months are *real*. Nintendo is going in the direction of the "non-gamer" for real, and they may never come back.

Take it out, it's 13 now.

I know what you mean, it's all about E3. Everyone is avoiding the new Mario Galaxy and Metroid Prime trailers like they've never avoided a huge thread before.



I'm not getting into a game by game arguement with you, the degradation that has occured in your list is frankly painful. Batallion Wars, Dewy's Adventure, Trauma Center, Mario Strikers,Crystal Chronicles, Mario Galaxy, and Zack & Wikiare not considered by most to be hardcore titles.






Woah....I agree that we should be worried....but if a quality platforming experience isn't considered "hardcore" I don't know what is. I also heard that trauma center is pretty difficult
Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#369 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

[QUOTE="Dualshockin"]Very well written post TC. I said this months ago,sales for the Wii are good for Nintendo,bad for us gamers.When I heard that they're now making future titles more accessible to the "new" market,and that they're now making games with the mindset of "even a newcomer can defeat an old timer",I knew that this was it for them. The biggest problem with Nintendo is they promised us new games,they promised us Online,they promised us,a revolution. So far,they have not delivered.SambaLele

:lol:

i'll translate what nintendo said there: "we are focusing on developing games that take much more luck and button mashing to win, instead of skill. Skill is not next-gen."


Umm.. no. Luck, chance, and button-mashing favor the underdog. I'm not sure if you've ever studied game design (I have with regard to RPGs) but an element of luck favors the less skilled player. Why? Because there's a chance they'll "get lucky" and kill a player with more skill.

The only way to make a less experienced player able to compete with a more experienced player is to introduce elements of chance to the game, reduce the ability of the skilled player to have exact control, and essentially do what Mario Party does.

For example, if you eliminate boosting in Mario Kart, well, that inexperienced player stands far more of a chance. Now add more random items to the game - more blue shells, more speed boosts, et cetera - and make more of them appear more often when you're in last place, rather than first. Finally, make those speed boosts more likely to put you in first place... and suddenly a "newbie" can beat an expert.

Have you made the game skill based? No, you've taken skill out of the equation. I don't find a game where everyone wins about the same percentage of the time to be as fun. I like to be in control, I like to feel that a win or loss came because of my own skills (or lack thereof) - but if you build a game to that, well, new players will get absolutely dominated, because they are inexperienced.

Avatar image for taco1881
taco1881

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#370 taco1881
Member since 2006 • 131 Posts
Video games wouldn't be where they are today if it wasn't for the everday Joe going out and buying them. Nintendo is once again bringing video games back to the masses, instead of just an elite group of "hardcore" gamers. Microsoft and Sony ruined gaming by catering to a bunch of losers who don't leave their houses for weeks so they can level up against imaginary friends. Yeah, Microsoft saved gaming by nickel and diming for every upgrade, $400 console, $60 games, $50 online, pay for every upgrade. And Sony, definately saving gaming by charging $600 just to play video games. You "hardcore" geniuses are a bunch of morons if you think Nintendo isn't saving the industry again. You'd all be crying about the $600 Xbox 720 and the $800 PS4 because that's where the industry was heading, thanks to "hardcore" gamers. Go outside and get some sun, its the summer.
Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#371 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts

Wow... best post ever. (I'm being 100% serious)

It almost brought a tear to my eye! because it's the truth. Good job.

dracula_16

yes.

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#372 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

Did I say any of that? No, I didn't. The refusal to play a game that someone not completely devoted to gaming can play- that is elitism, and you can't spin it any other way.

Tsug_Ze_Wind



It has nothing to do with who can play the games, and everything to do with whether the game appeals to me. If everyone in the world could play Battlefield 2, I'd still play it. Hell it would be great, there would be more players on the servers! But I'm not going to play Wii-Fit because...its a fitness game. It offers me none of the things I typically look for in a game. I won't ignore it because I think I'm "better" than the people that do, but because I simply don't want to play it. And that's the crux of this argument: Nintendo can't make games for "everyone", because no game appeals to everyone.

And yes, most of GUFU is elitist, and cowardly. Why do you need a GUFU board? Why can't you all be with the rest of us? Why do most of you speak of us as filth?

Tsug_Ze_Wind


That's quite a bold statement about a large group of people, and one thats loaded with insults to boot. Perhaps we like having a board where we can have meaningful discussions (both on and off-topic) without being interrupted by cheap insults? And of course, most of us still come here anyway...I've seen at least 8 or 10 post in just this thread.
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#373 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45531 Posts

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"] Indeed - nailed it again ! You sir are on a roll and it's challenging the highly sensitive fans that are fanboys but dont know it - you have much support as this thread is a testimony to that fact !Tsug_Ze_Wind

*gag* Go start a fan club, why don't you.

And I know I'm a fanboy, thank you very much.

Ewww Nasty !! Did not refer to you at all but you're responce says it all ! I guess the "shoe fits " - lol, though my statement to which you have the vile reaction had not singled you out at all ! Yikes

Self owned lol

Avatar image for Grodus5
Grodus5

7934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#374 Grodus5
Member since 2006 • 7934 Posts
If Nintendo was hurting gaming like you said, then you wouldn't be playing Halo 3 on September 25th, now would you? Nintendo is doing nothing to affect the other companies, so shut the heck up, they are not wrecking gaming!
Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#375 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts
Video games wouldn't be where they are today if it wasn't for the everday Joe going out and buying them. Nintendo is once again bringing video games back to the masses, instead of just an elite group of "hardcore" gamers. Microsoft and Sony ruined gaming by catering to a bunch of losers who don't leave their houses for weeks so they can level up against imaginary friends. Yeah, Microsoft saved gaming by nickel and diming for every upgrade, $400 console, $60 games, $50 online, pay for every upgrade. And Sony, definately saving gaming by charging $600 just to play video games. You "hardcore" geniuses are a bunch of morons if you think Nintendo isn't saving the industry again. You'd all be crying about the $600 Xbox 720 and the $800 PS4 because that's where the industry was heading, thanks to "hardcore" gamers. Go outside and get some sun, its the summer. taco1881


The industry was built on the sweat, blood, and piggybank's of core gamers. We were the ones buying console when $200 was a significant amount of money, and we were the ones buying games when $60 ~ $80 cartriges were considered acceptable (more expensive than even today's games when adjusted for inflation). If you think for a minute that "non-gamers" built the industry, you're absolutely insane.

It was the fickle nature of "casual / non-gamer" consumers that led to the collapse of 1983/1984. Atari's market became flooded with shoddy games, but it was ultimately consumers who bought these games *instead* of quality titles, leading to the market becoming flooded with them. Whe consumers stopped supporting the "core" companies, console gaming in the US died.

Nintendo's greatest contribution to gaming with the NES was the development of licensing - they specifically developed a system requiring game companies to submit games for approval, and pay a fee on each title, which prevented the market from being flooded with shoddy crap. Was it 100% effective? No. Did it help restore faith in gaming? Yes.

Now what is Nintendo doing? They've changed their focus to "non-gamers" and they're essentially putting the focus of their games development on titles we would have considered bargain-bin "how could you let this be released" games during the NES era. It's obvious where they see their bread buttered, and it's frankly a shame for those of us who have enjoyed their core franchises over the years.

Sony and Microsoft's high pricetags this generation are an unfortunate consequence of the rift between HD gaming and SD gaming, and the higher development costs. However, the costs will not continue to rise simply due to the basic laws of economics - they sell more units at a lower cost, and they are making an obvious effort to lower the price tag on their consoles, because it rewards them with more sales. In another year or so, the PS3 and 360 will both be more affordable consoles, and I do not see next generation being one of $800 consoles, but rather a return to the standard $300 price tag of the past two generations.

The most unfortunate thing about Nintendo's new direction (towards "non-gamers") is that core gamers do not get to enjoy an inexpensive console this generation. Nintendo has put something that is $250 on the market, but they have are not focusing their games enough on hardcore gamers for many of us to feel that it was $250 well spent.
Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#376 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts

And yes, most of GUFU is elitist, and cowardly. Why do you need a GUFU board? Why can't you all be with the rest of us? Why do most of you speak of us as filth?

Tsug_Ze_Wind

wow, are you serious right now?

you're just too deep for me.

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#377 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

[QUOTE="Dualshockin"]Very well written post TC. I said this months ago,sales for the Wii are good for Nintendo,bad for us gamers.When I heard that they're now making future titles more accessible to the "new" market,and that they're now making games with the mindset of "even a newcomer can defeat an old timer",I knew that this was it for them. The biggest problem with Nintendo is they promised us new games,they promised us Online,they promised us,a revolution. So far,they have not delivered.SambaLele

:lol:

i'll translate what nintendo said there: "we are focusing on developing games that take much more luck and button mashing to win, instead of skill. Skill is not next-gen."



I have to agree. Nintendo blew a lot of hot air in their conference about how their crazy controller things were going to allow newcomers to somewhow play on the same level as veterans. Personally, I think its a giant crock.

I've played hours and hours of Mario Kart: DD, many of them with people who never play video games. While they would have trouble with the game, none of them had any trouble with the concept of using an analog stick to steer. I mean its intuitive: move it left, car goes left. Their problems stemmed from not understanding the more advanced game concepts, not being familiar with the items, not knowing how the weight affected handling, etc. The only thing allowing them to compete at all was the whole "luck" factor introduced by the "random" items (plus the rubber-banding, of course). Is having a little plastic steering wheel going to suddenly make them an expert at the game? Of course not.
Avatar image for funnymario
funnymario

9122

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#378 funnymario
Member since 2005 • 9122 Posts

[QUOTE="taco1881"]Video games wouldn't be where they are today if it wasn't for the everday Joe going out and buying them. Nintendo is once again bringing video games back to the masses, instead of just an elite group of "hardcore" gamers. Microsoft and Sony ruined gaming by catering to a bunch of losers who don't leave their houses for weeks so they can level up against imaginary friends. Yeah, Microsoft saved gaming by nickel and diming for every upgrade, $400 console, $60 games, $50 online, pay for every upgrade. And Sony, definately saving gaming by charging $600 just to play video games. You "hardcore" geniuses are a bunch of morons if you think Nintendo isn't saving the industry again. You'd all be crying about the $600 Xbox 720 and the $800 PS4 because that's where the industry was heading, thanks to "hardcore" gamers. Go outside and get some sun, its the summer. subrosian


The industry was built on the sweat, blood, and piggybank's of core gamers. We were the ones buying console when $200 was a significant amount of money, and we were the ones buying games when $60 ~ $80 cartriges were considered acceptable (more expensive than even today's games when adjusted for inflation). If you think for a minute that "non-gamers" built the industry, you're absolutely insane.

It was the fickle nature of "casual / non-gamer" consumers that led to the collapse of 1983/1984. Atari's market became flooded with shoddy games, but it was ultimately consumers who bought these games *instead* of quality titles, leading to the market becoming flooded with them. Whe consumers stopped supporting the "core" companies, console gaming in the US died.

Nintendo's greatest contribution to gaming with the NES was the development of licensing - they specifically developed a system requiring game companies to submit games for approval, and pay a fee on each title, which prevented the market from being flooded with shoddy crap. Was it 100% effective? No. Did it help restore faith in gaming? Yes.

Now what is Nintendo doing? They've changed their focus to "non-gamers" and they're essentially putting the focus of their games development on titles we would have considered bargain-bin "how could you let this be released" games during the NES era. It's obvious where they see their bread buttered, and it's frankly a shame for those of us who have enjoyed their core franchises over the years.

Sony and Microsoft's high pricetags this generation are an unfortunate consequence of the rift between HD gaming and SD gaming, and the higher development costs. However, the costs will not continue to rise simply due to the basic laws of economics - they sell more units at a lower cost, and they are making an obvious effort to lower the price tag on their consoles, because it rewards them with more sales. In another year or so, the PS3 and 360 will both be more affordable consoles, and I do not see next generation being one of $800 consoles, but rather a return to the standard $300 price tag of the past two generations.

The most unfortunate thing about Nintendo's new direction (towards "non-gamers") is that core gamers do not get to enjoy an inexpensive console this generation. Nintendo has put something that is $250 on the market, but they have are not focusing their games enough on hardcore gamers for many of us to feel that it was $250 well spent.

Were you debating this all night??

Avatar image for TrueReligion_
TrueReligion_

11037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#379 TrueReligion_
Member since 2006 • 11037 Posts
Excellent post, I read it all actually. Anyone who disagrees has problems.
Avatar image for kiruyama
kiruyama

1205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#380 kiruyama
Member since 2006 • 1205 Posts
I wish FoamingPanda had written this. At least he uses a more creative vocabulary.
Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#381 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts
If Nintendo was hurting gaming like you said, then you wouldn't be playing Halo 3 on September 25th, now would you? Nintendo is doing nothing to affect the other companies, so shut the heck up, they are not wrecking gaming!Grodus5


Nintendo is hurting the franchises I once enjoyed, they are changing their games to appeal to a different audience, rather than focusing on ones aimed at myself. This is not hard to see. Their success with their shifted market has also piqued Sony and Microsoft's interest, hence Scene It, Viva Pinata Party, and Rock Band being focus titles of Microsoft's conference. Halo 3 is a casual title that still holds mass appeal, it will not go away just yet, but whether new and creative core games (which are expensive and risky) will come about when there is easy money in the "non-gamer" segment is questionable.

Nintendo's focus on "non-gamers" puts many development dollars, and developers, in this direction, rather than wanting to invest in new core IPs. We will never know what games we are missing out on, because EA, Ubisoft, et cetera wanted to put out a "non-gamer" title instead of a core title. We will never get to play the games Nintendo could have created, in place of the titles they are putting out now.

Miyamoto only has so much time and life, when he is asked to make one game over another, there is an opportunity cost - and that opportunity cost right now is the core gaming market that enjoys Nintendo characters and franchises.
Avatar image for jessesalinas
jessesalinas

2935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#382 jessesalinas
Member since 2007 • 2935 Posts

even though i dont agree with some of your points, i think you make a very good arguement.

over 380 posts in this thread- congrats,your thread is a success, subrosian.:)

Avatar image for Tsug_Ze_Wind
Tsug_Ze_Wind

9511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#383 Tsug_Ze_Wind
Member since 2006 • 9511 Posts
[QUOTE="Tsug_Ze_Wind"]

Did I say any of that? No, I didn't. The refusal to play a game that someone not completely devoted to gaming can play- that is elitism, and you can't spin it any other way.

Teufelhuhn



It has nothing to do with who can play the games-

No, it has everything to do with who can play the games, and the gamers who refuse to play the same games the non-gamers play. You're on something else completely.

[QUOTE="Tsug_Ze_Wind"]

And yes, most of GUFU is elitist, and cowardly. Why do you need a GUFU board? Why can't you all be with the rest of us? Why do most of you speak of us as filth?

Teufelhuhn



That's quite a bold statement about a large group of people, and one thats loaded with insults to boot. Perhaps we like having a board where we can have meaningful discussions (both on and off-topic) without being interrupted by cheap insults? And of course, most of us still come here anyway...I've seen at least 8 or 10 post in just this thread.

You can have meaningful discussions in SW, and you certainly don't need a board to yourselves just to keep out the occasional idiot. In doing so, you also keep out whoever you don't judge worthy. That's elitism and cowardice. Most of you insult the people in SW commonly. That's elitism.

Avatar image for Bill_McBlumpkin
Bill_McBlumpkin

1001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#384 Bill_McBlumpkin
Member since 2007 • 1001 Posts
[QUOTE="SambaLele"]

[QUOTE="Dualshockin"]Very well written post TC. I said this months ago,sales for the Wii are good for Nintendo,bad for us gamers.When I heard that they're now making future titles more accessible to the "new" market,and that they're now making games with the mindset of "even a newcomer can defeat an old timer",I knew that this was it for them. The biggest problem with Nintendo is they promised us new games,they promised us Online,they promised us,a revolution. So far,they have not delivered.subrosian

:lol:

i'll translate what nintendo said there: "we are focusing on developing games that take much more luck and button mashing to win, instead of skill. Skill is not next-gen."


Umm.. no. Luck, chance, and button-mashing favor the underdog. I'm not sure if you've ever studied game design (I have with regard to RPGs) but an element of luck favors the less skilled player. Why? Because there's a chance they'll "get lucky" and kill a player with more skill.

The only way to make a less experienced player able to compete with a more experienced player is to introduce elements of chance to the game, reduce the ability of the skilled player to have exact control, and essentially do what Mario Party does.

For example, if you eliminate boosting in Mario Kart, well, that inexperienced player stands far more of a chance. Now add more random items to the game - more blue shells, more speed boosts, et cetera - and make more of them appear more often when you're in last place, rather than first. Finally, make those speed boosts more likely to put you in first place... and suddenly a "newbie" can beat an expert.

Have you made the game skill based? No, you've taken skill out of the equation. I don't find a game where everyone wins about the same percentage of the time to be as fun. I like to be in control, I like to feel that a win or loss came because of my own skills (or lack thereof) - but if you build a game to that, well, new players will get absolutely dominated, because they are inexperienced.

I think you misread what he wrote.

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#385 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts

[QUOTE="Grodus5"]If Nintendo was hurting gaming like you said, then you wouldn't be playing Halo 3 on September 25th, now would you? Nintendo is doing nothing to affect the other companies, so shut the heck up, they are not wrecking gaming!subrosian


Nintendo is hurting the franchises I once enjoyed, they are changing their games to appeal to a different audience, rather than focusing on ones aimed at myself. This is not hard to see. Their success with their shifted market has also piqued Sony and Microsoft's interest, hence Scene It, Viva Pinata Party, and Rock Band being focus titles of Microsoft's conference. Halo 3 is a casual title that still holds mass appeal, it will not go away just yet, but whether new and creative core games (which are expensive and risky) will come about when there is easy money in the "non-gamer" segment is questionable.

Nintendo's focus on "non-gamers" puts many development dollars, and developers, in this direction, rather than wanting to invest in new core IPs. We will never know what games we are missing out on, because EA, Ubisoft, et cetera wanted to put out a "non-gamer" title instead of a core title. We will never get to play the games Nintendo could have created, in place of the titles they are putting out now.

Miyamoto only has so much time and life, when he is asked to make one game over another, there is an opportunity cost - and that opportunity cost right now is the core gaming market that enjoys Nintendo characters and franchises.

the gameplay footage of Mario galaxy and metroid prime 3 looked great.

And MP3 shows no signs of using th zapper

Avatar image for kittykatz5k
kittykatz5k

32249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#386 kittykatz5k
Member since 2004 • 32249 Posts
What franchises HAS nintenod ruined? They pretty much remained consistantly good...
Avatar image for Eponique
Eponique

17918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#387 Eponique
Member since 2007 • 17918 Posts

What franchises HAS nintenod ruined? They pretty much remained consistantly good...kittykatz5k

That's what I've been trying to say... :evil: Except I said it in a weirder way... I haven't slept in 41 hours...

Avatar image for Hoffgod
Hoffgod

12229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#388 Hoffgod
Member since 2006 • 12229 Posts
[QUOTE="Hoffgod"]

I'm not trying to dispute you or say you're wrong, Subrosian. You gotta do what you gotta do. But I just think you're being too hasty. You see the future as dull and bleak, I see it as bright and potentially getting brighter. Just a difference in perspective, I guess.

subrosian



I don't see the future as bleak, I just don't see Nintendo in my future. I don't consider a future where games like Bioshock, Fallout 3 (a bit concerned about Betheseda doing it though...), and Starcraft II are coming to be dull.

I said that because what you're taking a stand against is a growing market trend. The industry as a whole is focusing more and more on casual gamers. That seems to be your problem with Nintendo.

However, you seem to see from the market as a whole that there are hardcore games coming, such as those you mentioned, and that keeps you satisfied. That's understandable.

If anything, I'm just curious why you're taking that stance towards the industry as a whole, but a less tollerant attitude towards Nintendo. The hardcore games are coming from Nintendo, and they promise to be amazing, just like Bioshock or Starcraft II promise to be amazin. I just don't get why you choose to focus on the Wii

Avatar image for ELJUDEZ
ELJUDEZ

7389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#389 ELJUDEZ
Member since 2004 • 7389 Posts
Bravo!!
Avatar image for jujutheking
jujutheking

2998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#390 jujutheking
Member since 2006 • 2998 Posts

[QUOTE="subrosian"][QUOTE="Grodus5"]If Nintendo was hurting gaming like you said, then you wouldn't be playing Halo 3 on September 25th, now would you? Nintendo is doing nothing to affect the other companies, so shut the heck up, they are not wrecking gaming!Shinobishyguy



Nintendo is hurting the franchises I once enjoyed, they are changing their games to appeal to a different audience, rather than focusing on ones aimed at myself. This is not hard to see. Their success with their shifted market has also piqued Sony and Microsoft's interest, hence Scene It, Viva Pinata Party, and Rock Band being focus titles of Microsoft's conference. Halo 3 is a casual title that still holds mass appeal, it will not go away just yet, but whether new and creative core games (which are expensive and risky) will come about when there is easy money in the "non-gamer" segment is questionable.

Nintendo's focus on "non-gamers" puts many development dollars, and developers, in this direction, rather than wanting to invest in new core IPs. We will never know what games we are missing out on, because EA, Ubisoft, et cetera wanted to put out a "non-gamer" title instead of a core title. We will never get to play the games Nintendo could have created, in place of the titles they are putting out now.

Miyamoto only has so much time and life, when he is asked to make one game over another, there is an opportunity cost - and that opportunity cost right now is the core gaming market that enjoys Nintendo characters and franchises.

the gameplay footage of Mario galaxy and metroid prime 3 looked great.

And MP3 shows no signs of using th zapper

MP3 is a gm with a tiny bit improvement in the graphics department and bad ai.

Avatar image for agentfred
agentfred

5666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#391 agentfred
Member since 2003 • 5666 Posts

Lets not forget how Project Hammer has been reportedly canned in order to make room for more "expanded audience" games. If this turns out to be true, I can't see how it could be deniable.

Anyway, great post.

Avatar image for greenprince
greenprince

3332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#392 greenprince
Member since 2006 • 3332 Posts

I have been saying this for some time, and it has been misinterpreted over and over again. I've been called an elitist, biased, a hater, whatever....

Nintendo is hurting gaming.


Really nice title.....

Frankly, what Nintendo is doing right now is appealing to a market that's not us - the longtime gamer - but a market that is *them* - people who don't like videogames - people who play things like DDR, Guitar Hero, and Jane Fonda workout tapes. They shoved us aside with the Wii - in fact, look at Reggies' comments for the past two years - they *are no longer interested* in catering to us.

No longer interested? did you get the memo that E3 isn't a targeted for gamers to boast about how cool their games are but now and will always will be a press conference for investors? The fact that you make your first point with no indiction of you considering that they were aiming for you, non gamers, and investors/stockholders at the same time makes me consider that you angry when making this post.

At their press conference, Nintendo kept telling us "you're wrong". Over and over, in fact. They told us what to think. They told us "oh, you're wrong, this is gaming for everyone" - they essentially acted like "hehehe you're stupid, you don't get it." The reality is, they know this isn't gaming for us, they know we don't enjoy these games - but they figure, "hey, if we can tell some Nintendo diehards that we're making gaming *better*, maybe we can drag them along".

That post wasn't directly at you but for the people who foolishly thought that Nintendo was letting go of their main targets.

Everything they're doing right now is about catering to sales from a lucrative market - a market we've been calling "casuals" - but in retrospect we should have kept calling "non-gamers". Casuals *used to be* a market that pumped their chests for Madden and Halo - what we have here is a new beast entirely.

So, they're making money by exposing it self to a different demographic? excuse me but this doesn't concern you the slightest bit. Were you when the Psp, Xbox, PS1-3 were doing the same by exploiting the people who consired blood and violence as a true game? The fact that you made this post and igorned the other games makes me think that you rushed this post.

For a minute, just concede that Nintendo doesn't care. Why are they harming gaming? Because they control so many nostalgic series. I had to give this up *a long time ago*. As an early Sega fan, I had to accept that my favorite games - such as Sonic the Hedgehog - were no longer the same. I had to come to terms with the parent company Sega losing their minds - Sonic 3D Blast helped a great deal to drive that reality home, and by the time I played Sonic Shuffle and Sonic Adventure 2, it became easier to accept that Sega was going downhill.

Nintendo doesn't care? you make it seem like its one individual...when you should really think that they're other people who care thats inside the company working for them. and yet you make a post that is pretty damn ignorant to state that they are ruining the gaming industry? I'm sorry, this can considered to every gaming device out there. To the PSP that was considered ''kool'' to the Xbox that was considered awesome because it looked ''mature'' to The people doubting the Ds for being different and unique. Yet all those devices that have that image proved the audience wrong by showing them that they could do more.

Nintendo isn't dying, they were though, they were dying, losing marketshare, and they found this huge new market with the Wii... and unfortunately, much like Sega, they hold our old favorites hostage. So what do we get? Our best games come with concessions - Metroid Prime 3 will be built around "the zapper", goes back to stacked beams, and features basically a "turbo charged" mode -why? All in the interest of making the bastion of Nintendo's "hardcore" catalog still sell to some of the same people who will buy Wii Fitness.

Metroid Prime 3 had stacked beams way back in the old in days and turbo charged mode is something I bet they would put in the game even if it didn't target the non gamers.

They are trying to blend the ****c franchises into the Wii Sports / Play / Fitness market

Twilight Princess was one of the easiest Zelda games I've ever played, Super Paper Mario was time-consuming, but not exactly *challenging*, and Super Smash Brawl might not feature online gameplay.

Super Smash brothers will feature on line play, Twilight Princess was a easy gamebut it was still fun PaPERMArio WAS A GREAT GAME REAGARDLESS OF YOUR OPINION and Nintendo is still thesame company.


gameplay?" ... maybe Nintendo didn't notice that PC, Xbox 360, and PS3 have services that are lightyears ahead of what I do on a DS or Wii? I don't feel like I have "the world" in the palm of my hand when I play Mario Kart online on my DS - I feel like I might as well be playing against the AI - I can't identify if I'm really playing the same people again, there's no ranking, I can't talk to my opponents, I can't see my opponents - where is the online social interaction?

Its free you get what you pay for, and be glad that we actually have online.


I feel that Nintendo has realized that online doesn't matter to increase DS / Wii sales, so they're not doing it - that simply they said "building a service like PSN costs too much money, and look at the people buying a Wii, they don't care." I do care, however, it's important for me. I have friends and family all over the world - being able to see their face and hear their voice while I play is vital - it makes it so I'm playing a racing game with my little brother, even though he's in another city - it makes it so I can talk to the other gamers in my Halo clan, even though they're in Denmark. Nintendo's issue isn't that they "don't get it" - it's that their current salesbase says "I can go to YouTube and MySpace on my Wii - Wii does it all!"

Since when did online features are ''considered hardcore'' So you have people around the world good for you but aren't games considered to be about playing it not socializing to other players. To be honest I like the online features thats why I don't have to listen to a 12 year old boy talk about how he owns the game,

Nintendo is in a situation where, quite frankly, we, the longtime gamers, are supporting them out of nostalgia. If the actual *games* Nintendo is releasing - Metroid, Mario, Smash, et cetera - were the same games, but with new characters and titles, would we be buying them. Honestly, look in your heart and tell me you'd buy MP3 without the "M". This doesn't just apply to Nintendo - Halo 3 *looks awful* by comparisson to other FPS titles coming out this year - it hasn't *evolved* enough - the FPS genre moves and improve so quickly - yet Halo 3 looks archaic. Yet MP3 looks *even more* archaic, and we support it, why? Because it's Metroid. I'm as guilty as the next guy of doing this.

No, I support Metroid because of its games form past history. The fact that your judging the game from face value really makes me doubt you. Metroid like it or not will always be considered for fans who like from now to the day they bought the game for the Nes days. And were you dissing halo because it looks archaic? last time I checked people bought including me because it was fun.



I'm sorry, this all might not be the level of logic or cohesiveness I usually have - I have no intention of becoming a fanboy or a hater or anything else, but I'm done with Nintendo - I am washing my hands of them. For me it's about more than the games, it's also about the vision behind those games, about what you're trying to do with them. Yesterday's showcase was a disgusting display of chest-pounding arrogance and a clear showing that Nintendo does not view games as art.

View games as art? I'm sorry but these are the same guys that bought the gaming industry back to life, the same guys that made OOT legendary and made people and doubters considered game as art. The fact that you're claiming that they don't considered games as art is really an oxymoron. Arrogance is something all companies have,look at Sony when they were winning doesn't change that their systems of the PS2 and PS1 were really what they were bragging about to be true.

"Games are for everyone" doesn't mean you should stop making games for me. I always thought, as a kid when I played Gameboy, that Nintendo would grow up with me, and they haven't. Sega and Nintendo, hand-in-hand walked me down a brightly coloured path to living gaming - and now both of them are gone. Nintendo... Sega... gone. I thought they were gone last year, and I gave them one last chance here, I tried to be open-minded, but I can't do it anymore.

You're talking about yourself now? I'm sorry but your dreams of a company catering to every whim makes me skeptical that you thought this through. No company that I know of ever listens to the minority of the consumer they are targeting to when the rest is satisfied. Welcome to reality where the majority rules.

I cannot accept Nintendo's vision for gaming. I do not support the idea that titles such as Wii Fitness should be showcased as videogames.

So they offer one game and you're off the wagon. I'm sorry but that is incredibly stupid. If I did the same thing you did I wouldnt have realize the games that Xbox has other than Halo. When I first played the Xbox I thought the system was all about Halo but now I realize its a good system with good games that should be considered. But considering your off already maybe this best for you.

I'm done Nintendo. You do what you want to do, you will never get another dollar from me. Say good-bye to the tens of thousands I've spent on your products over the years. Frankly, it's my finest wish that every other longtime Nintendo fan do the same. Hardcore gamers represent a great deal of software sales - as long as we continue to support their "blended" market - where they make *just enough* of a hardcore spin on ****c franchises to tempt us, they will be able to keep being insanely profitable.

Sorry pal, I'm not going to listen to someone who considered their fondest wish is make other people come to your thinking. I've been with Nintendo since the NES days but now I have other systems too like the PS2 and Xbox but this doesn't regret my decision of buying a Wii. The fact that you're pissed off doesn't make Nintendo a sell out you're tryingtoview them as. I will play games like SSMBB, MP3, Mario Galaxy and so fourth while you still complain and try to convince others to quit. Sorry just because you left the band waggon doesn't mean you can create a new one for your intended ideas for what you consider hardcore.


I'm done. I'm sick and tired of having to hold my breath and pray - Sony this year "got it" - they were humble, they showed games, and they said "thanks for being here guys." Nintendo doesn't care. Sonic and Mario standing together in the same game should be enough of a warning sign to longtime gamers - hegehogs and plumbers running down a track together (at the same height, might I add, though Sega keeps changing how tall Sonic is every game, it's getting annoying) is, I believe, one of the signs of the apocalypse.

I'm sorry but Sony has to be more humble and caring for the last generations for what they did the last systems of bragging how their system is Superior, the fake trailers they do to make it seem like the Cell was revolutionary, the malfunction PS2s that out in the world, the fact that they claimed to make innovations that others did, the ideas they stole off from other competitors and other crazy statements. The fact that you're making Nintendo seem evil makes me consider that you're just other wii hater but make seem like you're informed.
Nintendo's world has ended, and I'm done with it. Bye, see ya. Time to get a second or third job, because the future of gaming as I enjoy it does not lie in your competively priced "plug-n-play" remote controlled gaming box.

Future of gaming? thats opinion and what whether its Sony, Nintendo or Microsoft or a mixture of all of it doesn't chang the fact that they are all future gaming. The fact that you make seem like Nintendo isn't part makes you just pissed off that reality strikedyou like lighting that Nintendo has to change and adapt to survive in the world that we call business, Its not personal but it is business.

subrosian
Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#393 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts
and even if you show no interest in the wii you can't really say "good-bye" to nintendo completely. They still got the handheld market in a vice grip.
Avatar image for Acemaster27
Acemaster27

4482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#394 Acemaster27
Member since 2004 • 4482 Posts

Dude, nintendo isn't giving up on you, they're just not giving up on your mom either. Whats wrong with that? nothing.

TC and anyone who agrees with him is just spoutin normal system wars hate. Its the only thing they can diss the Wii for because its having so much success.

Avatar image for agentfred
agentfred

5666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#395 agentfred
Member since 2003 • 5666 Posts

and even if you show no interest in the wii you can't really say "good-bye" to nintendo completely. They still got the handheld market in a vice grip.Shinobishyguy

Yet they have a smaller market share in the handheld department than any other generation ever.

Avatar image for Hoffgod
Hoffgod

12229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#396 Hoffgod
Member since 2006 • 12229 Posts

And yes, most of GUFU is elitist, and cowardly. Why do you need a GUFU board? Why can't you all be with the rest of us? Why do most of you speak of us as filth?

Tsug_Ze_Wind

Yeah, you don't know what goes on in the GUFU board. It's basically off topic with people from System Wars.

What were you expecting,some elitest affair where we all sit around in exquisite robes, smoking pipes and sipping brandy as we laugh at everyone else with a haughty scoff?

Avatar image for Firelore29
Firelore29

4158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#397 Firelore29
Member since 2007 • 4158 Posts
Can we please let this rediculous thread die already.
Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#398 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts

[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]and even if you show no interest in the wii you can't really say "good-bye" to nintendo completely. They still got the handheld market in a vice grip.agentfred

Yet they have a smaller market share in the handheld department than any other generation ever.

thats becasue this is the only gen where the compettion *the psp* hasn't completely crapped out like the game gear.
Avatar image for Sig12047
Sig12047

4194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#399 Sig12047
Member since 2004 • 4194 Posts
So, Nintendo is hurting the market because they are expanding the gaming audience? Man, what did Sony do with the PS and all the casuals that followed when that came out? And wow....if the Wii hurt the industry then I cant imagine with the NES did. I mean it saved the industry and brought it back from the dead....so really, by expanding it and saving it, it killed it. Makes sense... :roll:
Avatar image for agentfred
agentfred

5666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#400 agentfred
Member since 2003 • 5666 Posts
[QUOTE="agentfred"]

[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]and even if you show no interest in the wii you can't really say "good-bye" to nintendo completely. They still got the handheld market in a vice grip.Shinobishyguy

Yet they have a smaller market share in the handheld department than any other generation ever.

thats becasue this is the only gen where the compettion *the psp* hasn't completely crapped out like the game gear.

Right, and Nintendo has lost 1/3 of the market. Who know about the next handheld generation.