Gran Turismo 5 DAMAGE GAMEPLAY!!!

Well the damage didn't appear to be all that comprehensive and was only one 1 car.

Though these videos basically show us that GT5 is the best looking racing game (and single more realistic looking game) ever made.

Wasdie

Pretty sweet but does the damage affect the driving in this simulator racing game or is it just cosmetic?

Wow, this is probably the best looking game I have ever seen

Now we just have to see how it plays

[QUOTE="Rza_rectah"][QUOTE="cowgriller"]

yep irony.

cowgriller

actually, gameplay has 2xAA @60fps and the replay gets 4xAA but because of the added AA, the fps drops down to 30. hence, the replay does look clearer and more cinematic than gameplay.

and yes i know this thread is about damage, but so far all we know is that only certain cars would have it (probably only rally and nascar stock cars) and we have no idea if the damage has any effect on the car or is there simply add damage cosmetics. we'll have to wait until TGS to find out.

Pretty sweet but does the damage affect the driving in this simulator racing game or is it just cosmetic?

gago-gago

After doing a little digging, I found this thread...

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=25743154

Title of the thread: No damage in GT5 [CONFIRMED]

Fanboys bashing GT5 for not having damage, sony fanboys bashing forza's damage saying it was "half-assed."

Ah how times have changed...

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Well the damage didn't appear to be all that comprehensive and was only one 1 car.

Though these videos basically show us that GT5 is the best looking racing game (and single more realistic looking game) ever made.

L33tbanneador

Well when I play the game I don't plan on playing in the screen, I plan on watching off the screen.

Nobody cares to comment on mi opinion? :cry:

Oh my... I knew someone would link that eventually. Hold on to your butts. :?musicalmac

[QUOTE="musicalmac"]Oh my... I knew someone would link that eventually. Hold on to your butts. :?zero_snake99

Luckily most people here don't understand why that thread is bad for GT fans...

But on to more important topics. Riddle me this, GS users-

If the damage in GT5 fails to have negative effects on the performance of the cars, does the fact it has any sort of damage matter at all? Or is it pointless?

[QUOTE="cowgriller"]

[QUOTE="Rza_rectah"] This thread is about the damage, If you played prologue you can tell that the graphics are the same as in game and replay. zero_snake99

actually, gameplay has 2xAA @60fps and the replay gets 4xAA but because of the added AA, the fps drops down to 30. hence, the replay does look clearer and more cinematic than gameplay.

and yes i know this thread is about damage, but so far all we know is that only certain cars would have it (probably only rally and nascar stock cars) and we have no idea if the damage has any effect on the car or is there simply add damage cosmetics. we'll have to wait until TGS to find out.

no it's ok. you added more info.

[QUOTE="zero_snake99"][QUOTE="musicalmac"]Oh my... I knew someone would link that eventually. Hold on to your butts. :?musicalmac

Luckily most people here don't understand why that thread is bad for GT fans...

But on to more important topics. Riddle me this, GS users-

If the damage in GT5 fails to have negative effects on the performance of the cars, does the fact it has any sort of damage matter at all? Or is it pointless?

Nobody cares to comment on mi opinion? :cry:

bigblunt537

Why the only damaged car is the Subaru.....when Lancer hits it prety hard it has no scratch :SMagik85

Why are you assuming it does not affect performance, and if thats the case..... then you answered your own question.Adrian_Cloud

My theory regarding damage,car list, and interior view.

I honestly think last E3 had PD a little nervous about the game and it has changed their plans a lot. Heres my reason why. Do you all remember GTHD? The car models were converted from ps2 to the ps3 with high res textures and it looked EXCELLENT, but not as good as GT5p models. I honestly think that this is where the huge part of the 1000 models are coming from. This is probably why they said only a certain amount will have interior views and damage. These cars wont have damage and interior views because they are the same models in HD as the ps2 counter part. I think all the new models they have designed specifically for GT5 will have damage and interior views.

Also I don't believe that PD wont add damage because car manufacturers don't want their cars displayed with damage. If this were the case then games like Forza and NFS wouldn't have car damage either for the same reason and it would only be a select amount of vehicles just like GT5.

Regardless GT5 looks awesome and I will buy it regardless. The damage modeling also looks top notch. This my theory/opinion and I'm entitled to it, but I just feel like this game is being inflated with the GT4 models which can be a back stabber if they don't include damage/interior views for them as well.

I posted this in the other GT5 thread, but noone responded and I'd like to see what others think about my theory. I mean PD did say it takes about a month per car and now they have 1000 cars...

bigblunt537

I think all cars will have interiors. They are adding a photomode (track and still) so, don't expect taking pictures of cars that don't have their interiors, unless they are only going to have photomode for 200 cars (which is lame and they know that would be lame too). They have competition and they are stepping it up. I expect damage for all cars will reach GT at some point, I just don't know when.

Also, man am I tired or what? I stayed up for that lame ass MS conference. Nap time.

[QUOTE="Adrian_Cloud"]Why are you assuming it does not affect performance, and if thats the case..... then you answered your own question.musicalmac

Dunno if this game will have dmg or not...

Dunno if will be good in the end , since i im PC gamer , i dont care either...

but what im seeing is freakin amazing.. Im playing my games only at 1920x1200 . 8x - 16x..

And this made me wow at 1280x1080p with 4x?!! It looks pretty awesome..

Kudos to polyphony for this , is extremely well done..!!

[QUOTE="bigblunt537"]

My theory regarding damage,car list, and interior view.

I honestly think last E3 had PD a little nervous about the game and it has changed their plans a lot. Heres my reason why. Do you all remember GTHD? The car models were converted from ps2 to the ps3 with high res textures and it looked EXCELLENT, but not as good as GT5p models. I honestly think that this is where the huge part of the 1000 models are coming from. This is probably why they said only a certain amount will have interior views and damage. These cars wont have damage and interior views because they are the same models in HD as the ps2 counter part. I think all the new models they have designed specifically for GT5 will have damage and interior views.

Also I don't believe that PD wont add damage because car manufacturers don't want their cars displayed with damage. If this were the case then games like Forza and NFS wouldn't have car damage either for the same reason and it would only be a select amount of vehicles just like GT5.

Regardless GT5 looks awesome and I will buy it regardless. The damage modeling also looks top notch. This my theory/opinion and I'm entitled to it, but I just feel like this game is being inflated with the GT4 models which can be a back stabber if they don't include damage/interior views for them as well.

I posted this in the other GT5 thread, but noone responded and I'd like to see what others think about my theory. I mean PD did say it takes about a month per car and now they have 1000 cars...

zero_snake99

I think all cars will have interiors. They are adding a photomode (track and still) so, don't expect taking pictures of cars that don't have their interiors, unless they are only going to have photomode for 200 cars (which is lame and they know that would be lame too). They have competition and they are stepping it up. I expect damage for all cars will reach GT at some point, I just don't know when.

Also, man am I tired or what? I stayed up for that lame ass MS conference. Nap time.

Well thanks for the response. About the photomode they could easily have just added very tinted videos like the subaru pic I showed. I mean I hope I'm wrong and that they all have an interior view and all cars have damage, but thats what I was able to put together with the information given.

[QUOTE="zero_snake99"][QUOTE="musicalmac"]Oh my... I knew someone would link that eventually. Hold on to your butts. :?musicalmac

Luckily most people here don't understand why that thread is bad for GT fans...

But on to more important topics. Riddle me this, GS users-

If the damage in GT5 fails to have negative effects on the performance of the cars, does the fact it has any sort of damage matter at all? Or is it pointless?

Even without damage, it would still be considered a driving simulator. Having damage does not make one game a better sim then the next automatically. If you honestly think thats the case, then burnout must be your number one choice for a sim.Adrian_Cloud

I personally love looking at the detail they do, but it would be pointless if it didn't have effects on the car. Kazunori has said several times. If he were to do damage, he would do it right. So I will go ahead and assume that it CAN effect the cars if you have the setting on.zero_snake99

[QUOTE="zero_snake99"]

[QUOTE="bigblunt537"]

My theory regarding damage,car list, and interior view.

I honestly think last E3 had PD a little nervous about the game and it has changed their plans a lot. Heres my reason why. Do you all remember GTHD? The car models were converted from ps2 to the ps3 with high res textures and it looked EXCELLENT, but not as good as GT5p models. I honestly think that this is where the huge part of the 1000 models are coming from. This is probably why they said only a certain amount will have interior views and damage. These cars wont have damage and interior views because they are the same models in HD as the ps2 counter part. I think all the new models they have designed specifically for GT5 will have damage and interior views.

Also I don't believe that PD wont add damage because car manufacturers don't want their cars displayed with damage. If this were the case then games like Forza and NFS wouldn't have car damage either for the same reason and it would only be a select amount of vehicles just like GT5.

Regardless GT5 looks awesome and I will buy it regardless. The damage modeling also looks top notch. This my theory/opinion and I'm entitled to it, but I just feel like this game is being inflated with the GT4 models which can be a back stabber if they don't include damage/interior views for them as well.

I posted this in the other GT5 thread, but noone responded and I'd like to see what others think about my theory. I mean PD did say it takes about a month per car and now they have 1000 cars...

bigblunt537

I think all cars will have interiors. They are adding a photomode (track and still) so, don't expect taking pictures of cars that don't have their interiors, unless they are only going to have photomode for 200 cars (which is lame and they know that would be lame too). They have competition and they are stepping it up. I expect damage for all cars will reach GT at some point, I just don't know when.

Also, man am I tired or what? I stayed up for that lame ass MS conference. Nap time.

Well thanks for the response. About the photomode they could easily have just added very tinted videos like the subaru pic I showed. I mean I hope I'm wrong and that they all have an interior view and all cars have damage, but thats what I was able to put together with the information given.

[QUOTE="musicalmac"][QUOTE="zero_snake99"] *holds tight*zero_snake99

Luckily most people here don't understand why that thread is bad for GT fans...

But on to more important topics. Riddle me this, GS users-

If the damage in GT5 fails to have negative effects on the performance of the cars, does the fact it has any sort of damage matter at all? Or is it pointless?

I personally love looking at the detail they do, but it would be pointless if it didn't have effects on the car. Kazunori has said several times. If he were to do damage, he would do it right. So I will go ahead and assume that it CAN effect the cars if you have the setting on.

http://www.4players.de/4players.php/...Turismo_5.html Some important stuff from that link:

- Some Parts don´t fall of.

- Car behaves different when damaged.

- Computer AI cars drive unfair, and do not take damage or slow down when the hit you.

- Only Arcade mode showed at GamesCom.

- No graphs showing what parts are damaged.

- The mirrors and windows cannot be damaged.

wow finally and it looks freaking awesome, much better then GT5P.

But will every car have damage?

[QUOTE="Adrian_Cloud"]Even without damage, it would still be considered a driving simulator. Having damage does not make one game a better sim then the next automatically. If you honestly think thats the case, then burnout must be your number one choice for a sim.musicalmac

I personally love looking at the detail they do, but it would be pointless if it didn't have effects on the car. Kazunori has said several times. If he were to do damage, he would do it right. So I will go ahead and assume that it CAN effect the cars if you have the setting on.zero_snake99

that Subaru (I own 2 STIs btw) replay video actually made this game look bad IMO.... i see nothing to be all "OMFG" about. The way the car bounces off the wall is simply hilarious, i mean it looks OK i guess but i see NOTHING that really sets it apart.

IMO Forza 3 will blow this game out of the water.

- Some Parts don´t fall of.

-Car behaves different when damaged.

- Computer AI cars drive unfair, and do not take damage or slow down when the hit you.

- Only Arcade mode showed at GamesCom.

- No graphs showing what parts are damaged.

- The mirrors and windows cannot be damaged.

bleehum

[QUOTE="-Reggaeton-"]

Forza who?

GiantMuffin

I'm getting both because both games offer different features that i'm looking forward to.

that Subaru (I own 2 STIs btw) replay video actually made this game look bad IMO.... i see nothing to be all "OMFG" about. The way the car bounces off the wall is simply hilarious, i mean it looks OK i guess but i see NOTHING that really sets it apart.

IMO Forza 3 will blow this game out of the water.

2scoopsofempty

I don't understand the whole wall bouncing claim. The way I remember Forza 2 was that sliding off the walls didn't do much damage at all. You could still drive at your top speed... I even used to glide off the computer cars. The only damaging aspect of Forza 2 was being hit hard in the back or front of your car. (unles you find a way to get rammed from the side)

[QUOTE="bleehum"]

- Some Parts don´t fall of.

-Car behaves different when damaged.

- Computer AI cars drive unfair, and do not take damage or slow down when the hit you.

- Only Arcade mode showed at GamesCom.

- No graphs showing what parts are damaged.

- The mirrors and windows cannot be damaged.

musicalmac

wow finally and it looks freaking awesome, much better then GT5P.

But will every car have damage?

Furzjodler

- Some Parts don´t fall of.

- Car behaves different when damaged.

- Computer AI cars drive unfair, and do not take damage or slow down when the hit you.

- Only Arcade mode showed at GamesCom.

- No graphs showing what parts are damaged.

- The mirrors and windows cannot be damaged.

bleehum

[QUOTE="2scoopsofempty"]

that Subaru (I own 2 STIs btw) replay video actually made this game look bad IMO.... i see nothing to be all "OMFG" about. The way the car bounces off the wall is simply hilarious, i mean it looks OK i guess but i see NOTHING that really sets it apart.

IMO Forza 3 will blow this game out of the water.

bigblunt537

I don't understand the whole wall bouncing claim. The way I remember Forza 2 was that sliding off the walls didn't do much damage at all. You could still drive at your top speed... I even used to glide off the computer cars. The only damaging aspect of Forza 2 was being hit hard in the back or front of your car. (unles you find a way to get rammed from the side)

[QUOTE="bigblunt537"]

[QUOTE="2scoopsofempty"]

that Subaru (I own 2 STIs btw) replay video actually made this game look bad IMO.... i see nothing to be all "OMFG" about. The way the car bounces off the wall is simply hilarious, i mean it looks OK i guess but i see NOTHING that really sets it apart.

IMO Forza 3 will blow this game out of the water.

DeadMagazines

I don't understand the whole wall bouncing claim. The way I remember Forza 2 was that sliding off the walls didn't do much damage at all. You could still drive at your top speed... I even used to glide off the computer cars. The only damaging aspect of Forza 2 was being hit hard in the back or front of your car. (unles you find a way to get rammed from the side)

I'm not talking about that part. I'm talking about the wall gliding people talk about. On the other aspect yes I agree with you and hope that changes.

[QUOTE="bigblunt537"]

[QUOTE="2scoopsofempty"]

that Subaru (I own 2 STIs btw) replay video actually made this game look bad IMO.... i see nothing to be all "OMFG" about. The way the car bounces off the wall is simply hilarious, i mean it looks OK i guess but i see NOTHING that really sets it apart.

IMO Forza 3 will blow this game out of the water.

DeadMagazines

I don't understand the whole wall bouncing claim. The way I remember Forza 2 was that sliding off the walls didn't do much damage at all. You could still drive at your top speed... I even used to glide off the computer cars. The only damaging aspect of Forza 2 was being hit hard in the back or front of your car. (unles you find a way to get rammed from the side)

[QUOTE="bigblunt537"]

[QUOTE="2scoopsofempty"]

that Subaru (I own 2 STIs btw) replay video actually made this game look bad IMO.... i see nothing to be all "OMFG" about. The way the car bounces off the wall is simply hilarious, i mean it looks OK i guess but i see NOTHING that really sets it apart.

IMO Forza 3 will blow this game out of the water.

DeadMagazines

I don't understand the whole wall bouncing claim. The way I remember Forza 2 was that sliding off the walls didn't do much damage at all. You could still drive at your top speed... I even used to glide off the computer cars. The only damaging aspect of Forza 2 was being hit hard in the back or front of your car. (unles you find a way to get rammed from the side)

That was arcade mode, so simulation damage could have been turned off

that Subaru (I own 2 STIs btw) replay video actually made this game look bad IMO.... i see nothing to be all "OMFG" about. The way the car bounces off the wall is simply hilarious, i mean it looks OK i guess but i see NOTHING that really sets it apart.

IMO Forza 3 will blow this game out of the water.

[QUOTE="bleehum"]

- Some Parts don´t fall of.

- Car behaves different when damaged.

- Computer AI cars drive unfair, and do not take damage or slow down when the hit you.

- Only Arcade mode showed at GamesCom.

- No graphs showing what parts are damaged.

- The mirrors and windows cannot be damaged.

zero_snake99

GT5 has better graphics then forza 3 no surprize there...its GT. forza will get AAA, GT5 will get AAA. so what they get in ratings on GS wont finish the arguement because GS uses the .5 rating system. GT5 will obvously sale more but sales dont determine the quality. critic score is what will settle it

[QUOTE="2scoopsofempty"]

that Subaru (I own 2 STIs btw) replay video actually made this game look bad IMO.... i see nothing to be all "OMFG" about. The way the car bounces off the wall is simply hilarious, i mean it looks OK i guess but i see NOTHING that really sets it apart.

IMO Forza 3 will blow this game out of the water.

bigblunt537

I don't understand the whole wall bouncing claim. The way I remember Forza 2 was that sliding off the walls didn't do much damage at all. You could still drive at your top speed... I even used to glide off the computer cars. The only damaging aspect of Forza 2 was being hit hard in the back or front of your car. (unles you find a way to get rammed from the side)

*holds tight*zero_snake99

Luckily most people here don't understand why that thread is bad for GT fans...

musicalmac

From skimming it, its bad because one of the biggest differences between Forza and GT series is the inclusion of damage. The GT fans downplayed with claims of damage not being neccesary and them actually not wanting damage at all to them saying they'd enjoy GT more without the inclusion of damage. Essentially they didn't want damage.

Now from reading this thread they are praising something that they initially bashed and didn't want because it was on Forza and not GT.

Hold on to your butts. :?musicalmac

Well it is a pretty much complete flip flop from going to disliking damage to hooray we have damage.

What happens if you don't hold your butt? :?

FORZA 3 looks the same i dont see somting new here and forza 3 have damge on all car Nisim19

Oh, its you. Nothing to see here folks just a lem :roll: