[QUOTE="HAZE-Unit"][QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"] Why is it silly. If people here are saying that $20 for 20 extra hrs is milkage why is not rational to question those same people on why $60 for a 5 hr is not milkage? If both are great games what is the difference?NitaraPwnzU
OK, according to their logic you are right, but Im talking about the whole experience, if this 20 hours didn't deliver like those of 5 hours then it is not worth it, I just want people to not get their hopes up.
Bioshock is example of what Im saying, people said it had 20-25 hours of gameplay, it was the worst nightmare I had in gaming, lol, really the first 3-4 hours were interesting, after that all of its weakness showed off, I didn't even finish it.
In your opinion. Not everyone feels the same way..
Matter of fact Bioshock was worth every penny and if you never finished that game I pity you for missing out on one of the best games last year, recognized by many many gaming sites.
No, not just my opinion, alot of people talked and created topics about how much of a disappointment was Bioshock.
And I don't care much for scores btw.
Anyways, lets get back to the topic, the DLC has no description so far, we really don't know if it is going to add a whole new story and city, or just repeated side missions for 10 hours, that all Im saying.
It is about the whole experience, is it something new? or is it something similar to what we are going to play for the core game?
Log in to comment