HALO REACH is the current FPS graphic king on console. Not KILLZONE 2 anymore.

[QUOTE="monkeysmoke"][QUOTE="soulitane"]I don't see why you're bragging about the AA in Reach when the game is really jagged.gaming25

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"][QUOTE="monkeysmoke"] NOPE!! 540p = sub HD 640P = sub HD 720P = HD 1080P = True HD or Full HD so 1152x720 = 720p = HD there no other name for it except HD.monkeysmoke

Um, monkeysmoke, Halo Reach is 1152x720.

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"][QUOTE="monkeysmoke"] NOPE!! 540p = sub HD 640P = sub HD 720P = HD 1080P = True HD or Full HD so 1152x720 = 720p = HD there no other name for it except HD.monkeysmoke

[QUOTE="gaming25"][QUOTE="monkeysmoke"] jagged? Oh reach is jagged? Is it realy jagged? NO!!! Digital Foundary never said anything about halo reach being jaggie or any AA issue as they do point out in other games tech analysis http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-halo-reach-tech-analysis-article Am playing halo reach right now & it is smoother compared to the jaggie fested killzone 2.monkeysmoke

All I had to do was read the praise for ODST at the start to know it was biased. Reach is not graphics king.gamebreakerz__

is TC trolling?

i really cant see anyone thinking Reach is graphics king

if it's not the best looking game on any system then it's not any kind of king. there's only one king. would you settle for graphics prince?

CaseyWegner

its a great game... definately one of the best exclusives avaible on 360.. however its no console graphics king...

No lol

I will never understand what all the fuss is over KZ2 graphics. They are not impressive at all. Goodness, it must be a preference thing because I just don't see it. As I've said before, KZ2 is a blurry, smudgy mess. Sorry but that vaseline look ain't doin' it for me. Not to mention it has some poor textures. But not only that I've noticed that in some areas it sports some low-poly structures in the environment. Graphically it really is weird-looking and is inconsistent. Okay for example...I can just look at UC2 and I can say without a shadow of a doubt that UC2 looks GOOD. When you look at KZ2 something looks off but again it must be a preference thing... The ONLY thing that I can say impresses me about KZ2 are the gun models. Beyond that however things start to get iffy.

So yeah to me Halo: Reach looks sharper and better in the graphics department. Not to mention all the stuff going on like number of enemies, friendlies, vehicles, A.I, etc.. and this game blows Killzone 2 out of the water. So to conclude yes to me Reach looks better than KZ2 and as a complete package KZ2 shouldn't even be mentioned compared to Halo: Reach. That is actually an insult to Bungie and all of the hard work they've thrown into the Halo series. Now graphics king? Not really ready to give it that title. Doesn't matter though because it still looks great.

It's more technically impressive i agree, but it's not graphics king.racing1750

[QUOTE="racing1750"]It's more technically impressive i agree, but it's not graphics king.worknow222

[QUOTE="worknow222"][QUOTE="racing1750"]It's more technically impressive i agree, but it's not graphics king.racing1750

I will have to disagree

Killzone 2 was never the best FPS to start with in the first place:P

Oh please...

Reach is on par with MW2. maybe Black Ops.

hey guys i hear 1152 x 720p is the new benchmark for HD. isn't that cool.. ROFLMAO:lol:

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

if it's not the best looking game on any system then it's not any kind of king. there's only one king. would you settle for graphics prince?

SaltyMeatballs

there's certainly no such thing as console graphics king. not here.

there's certainly no such thing as console graphics king. not here.

CaseyWegner

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

there's certainly no such thing as console graphics king. not here.

Stevo_the_gamer

With the way this board works, I doubt it can be banned. There's no official "console graphics king", but that won't stop people from talking about it, nor should it! Remember anarchy, right? The only thing official about this board is that we use Gamespot scores to determine flops and count high-scoring exclusives for the meta game. Oh, and PC counts!

reach looks amzing haters just keep crying

[QUOTE="racing1750"][QUOTE="worknow222"] No one said it was were Just saying it looks better than Killzone 2 the graphics FPS King on Consolesworknow222

With the way this board works, I doubt it can be banned. There's no official "console graphics king", but that won't stop people from talking about it, nor should it! Remember anarchy, right? The only thing official about this board is that we use Gamespot scores to determine flops and count high-scoring exclusives for the meta game. Oh, and PC counts!

Episode_Eve

I will never understand what all the fuss is over KZ2 graphics. They are not impressive at all. Goodness, it must be a preference thing because I just don't see it. As I've said before, KZ2 is a blurry, smudgy mess. Sorry but that vaseline look ain't doin' it for me. Not to mention it has some poor textures. But not only that I've noticed that in some areas it sports some low-poly structures in the environment. Graphically it really is weird-looking and is inconsistent. Okay for example...I can just look at UC2 and I can say without a shadow of a doubt that UC2 looks GOOD. When you look at KZ2 something looks off but again it must be a preference thing... The ONLY thing that I can say impresses me about KZ2 are the gun models. Beyond that however things start to get iffy.

So yeah to me Halo: Reach looks sharper and better in the graphics department. Not to mention all the stuff going on like number of enemies, friendlies, vehicles, A.I, etc.. and this game blows Killzone 2 out of the water. So to conclude yes to me Reach looks better than KZ2 and as a complete package KZ2 shouldn't even be mentioned compared to Halo: Reach. That is actually an insult to Bungie and all of the hard work they've thrown into the Halo series. Now graphics king? Not really ready to give it that title. Doesn't matter though because it still looks great.

T-razor1

[QUOTE="T-razor1"]

I will never understand what all the fuss is over KZ2 graphics. They are not impressive at all. Goodness, it must be a preference thing because I just don't see it. As I've said before, KZ2 is a blurry, smudgy mess. Sorry but that vaseline look ain't doin' it for me. Not to mention it has some poor textures. But not only that I've noticed that in some areas it sports some low-poly structures in the environment. Graphically it really is weird-looking and is inconsistent. Okay for example...I can just look at UC2 and I can say without a shadow of a doubt that UC2 looks GOOD. When you look at KZ2 something looks off but again it must be a preference thing... The ONLY thing that I can say impresses me about KZ2 are the gun models. Beyond that however things start to get iffy.

So yeah to me Halo: Reach looks sharper and better in the graphics department. Not to mention all the stuff going on like number of enemies, friendlies, vehicles, A.I, etc.. and this game blows Killzone 2 out of the water. So to conclude yes to me Reach looks better than KZ2 and as a complete package KZ2 shouldn't even be mentioned compared to Halo: Reach. That is actually an insult to Bungie and all of the hard work they've thrown into the Halo series. Now graphics king? Not really ready to give it that title. Doesn't matter though because it still looks great.

monkeysmoke

Err..no. Killzone 2, Metro and even HL2 Ep 2 look better than Reach.

Killzone 2 has better graphics than Reach, there's no need for discussion, it's painfully obvious.

The truth is that GG used tricks & shortcuts like limiting colours,limiting scales & AI on screen to archieve killzone 2 vissuals while bungie didnt sacrifice or use any form of trick such as limiting colours or limiting enviromental scales to archieve halo reach's visual.

Halo reach' sandbox large scale enviroment,huge amounts of smart AI on screen & finally meeting 720p hd & increased poly counts is a big K.O to killzone 2.

TRUTH is bitter.monkeysmoke

LAWL

You can't actually believe this is a fact right?

Reach uses pretty much the same animations as Halo 2, i'm dying to get some time on my hands to make some gifs
The "A.I." on Reach is little less than left and right strafe back and forward.
And if you think a graphics engine vomiting brightly colors like a rainbow is a good thing on a war game... Well then more power to you.

Side by side Reach does no look better than Killzone 2, period, truth is bitter and everyone here will prove you wrong, i see you join gs a month and a bit ago, let me tell you thats not how you act here, trying to pass opinions as facts... Actually SW is all about that, but what ever :P Have a nice day.

[QUOTE="T-razor1"]

I will never understand what all the fuss is over KZ2 graphics. They are not impressive at all. Goodness, it must be a preference thing because I just don't see it. As I've said before, KZ2 is a blurry, smudgy mess. Sorry but that vaseline look ain't doin' it for me. Not to mention it has some poor textures. But not only that I've noticed that in some areas it sports some low-poly structures in the environment. Graphically it really is weird-looking and is inconsistent. Okay for example...I can just look at UC2 and I can say without a shadow of a doubt that UC2 looks GOOD. When you look at KZ2 something looks off but again it must be a preference thing... The ONLY thing that I can say impresses me about KZ2 are the gun models. Beyond that however things start to get iffy.

So yeah to me Halo: Reach looks sharper and better in the graphics department. Not to mention all the stuff going on like number of enemies, friendlies, vehicles, A.I, etc.. and this game blows Killzone 2 out of the water. So to conclude yes to me Reach looks better than KZ2 and as a complete package KZ2 shouldn't even be mentioned compared to Halo: Reach. That is actually an insult to Bungie and all of the hard work they've thrown into the Halo series. Now graphics king? Not really ready to give it that title. Doesn't matter though because it still looks great.

monkeysmoke