[QUOTE="FragTycoon"][QUOTE="TheUtmost"][QUOTE="FragTycoon"][QUOTE="TheUtmost"][QUOTE="FragTycoon"] [QUOTE="TheUtmost"]Halo 3 is entertaining, as well, especially the campaign. But I prefer cutting my enemies in half and obtaining awesome head-shots. Halo 3 is fun, but in my opinion, Gears of War is better. It's just a seriously awesome game, like GameSpot said. In passing, Halo 3's hype was too big! TheUtmost
chainsaws on guns and headshots = masterpiece.....
*sigh*
It was just two examples. Obviously, you haven't played Gears of War.
Hype + good multiplayer = masterpiece? *Big sigh*
Obviously, anyone who disagrees with you haven't played the game.... *big-ER sigh*
I don't know whats worst, the fact that you think it's a masterpiece or that you risk self-ownage to defend it.
Apparently, you think it's sad if anyone thinks that a highly successful game that scored "9.6" at GameSpot is a 'masterpiece', and better than the overhyped Halo 3. *Biggest Er sigh in human history*
I never said Halo was a masterpiece... or even better!
What I took offence too was that gears has some sort of advantage between the two because of chainsaws and headshots. That logic just.... fails!
EDIT: oh and if you are gonna score-monger, GTAIV says hello
Yes, GTA. No, it doesn't fail, one of the greatest kills in gaming history is an advantage, and in Halo 3, most boring headshots. fail
CoD4, Killing the other team with a air-strike/helicopter.... Halo, running someone over with a warthog...
you like chainsaws.. so its better... got it :roll:
funny
Log in to comment