Halo 3 sucks, not as bad as 2, but way worse than 1.
100million people could play crap in a box, doesnt make it a great game.
warmaster670
This. This is called hitting the nail on the head imo.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Halo 3 sucks, not as bad as 2, but way worse than 1.
100million people could play crap in a box, doesnt make it a great game.
warmaster670
This. This is called hitting the nail on the head imo.
[QUOTE="warmaster670"]
Halo 3 sucks, not as bad as 2, but way worse than 1.
100million people could play crap in a box, doesnt make it a great game.
This. This is called hitting the nail on the head imo.
Except for the fact that reviewers agree that it is a fantastic game. So when you add popularity with great reviews it pretty much does = great game. Now if you don't like it...that's fine, but it doesn't mean the game is crap.good sales doesn't mean it's a good product.markop2003True, but Halo doesnt just have sales. It has AAA reviews and ongoing popularity to further prove its status as a pretty awesome game.
actually it is more like1 million a day ,and last night there were 390,000 on at one time, and yes halo 3 is the bestThey all seem to think it is bad. But the 200,000 people who play it everyday and the 1 billion matches played online don't seem to think so.
flacracker173
[QUOTE="warmaster670"]
Halo 3 sucks, not as bad as 2, but way worse than 1.
100million people could play crap in a box, doesnt make it a great game.
This. This is called being biased as hell and uninformed and ignorant imo.
Here is the thing... There will always be people that dislike things other people like. I hate 99% of PS3 games. KZ2 is the only game I feel is worth the $60 I spent.
People can argue with me on that... But that's how I feel.
Not everyone is gonna like what the majority does like.
so because what we assume to be a majority of people like halo, the others who don't are all missing out because they don't share the same opinion? oh god how horrible it must be for someone to not like halo when they could join the other 200,000 in enjoying it :roll:They all seem to think it is bad. But the 200,000 people who play it everyday and the 1 billion matches played online don't seem to think so.
flacracker173
9.5 get over itWhen you own a console as cheap as a 360, bought a game like Halo 3 with it, and then realize that you just wasted $59.99...I'm pretty sure you'd be in extreme denial and play that game all the time, as well.
drj077
People should learn to respect opinions.
I dont like Halo 3, i played with my friend Co-op and i didn't like it, after a while we switch to GEOW Co-op, but is just my opinion, even my friend who bought his 360 because of Halo franchise said he was dissapointed, but again, is just his opinion, because it doesn't matter how hard TC laugh, not every person in the planet is going to love the game.
I think smokign is bad for you, but the millions of people that do it dont seem to care.
Just because it's popular doesn't mean it's good, take the wii for example.
I like Halo 3, but I dont like your argument.
How many doctors do you know that say smoking is good for you?200,00 isn't much considering it sold millions. 1 billion matches doesnt mean anything since it doesnt mention how many were incomplete or how long they lasted. If KZ2 has 1 min matches it would have 1 billion too.They all seem to think it is bad. But the 200,000 people who play it everyday and the 1 billion matches played online don't seem to think so.
flacracker173
They all seem to think it is bad. But the 200,000 people who play it everyday and the 1 billion matches played online don't seem to think so.
200,00 isn't much considering it sold millions. 1 billion matches doesnt mean anything since it doesnt mention how many were incomplete or how long they lasted. If KZ2 has 1 min matches it would have 1 billion too. the fail in this thread rivals enronPeople should learn to respect opinions.
I dont like Halo 3, i played with my friend Co-op and i didn't like it, after a while we switch to GEOW Co-op, but is just my opinion, even my friend who bought his 360 because of Halo franchise said he was dissapointed, but again, is just his opinion, because it doesn't matter how hard TC laugh, not every person in the planet is going to love the game.
madsnakehhh
Respecting other opinions is one thing, but when the other person just bashes the game and give no good reason (or had never played the game) then you should not respect that opinion.
Halo is alittle overrated, but the amount of hate it is getting is not fair. It seems some people just hate Halo because it is "cool" and alot of other people are doing it.
I guess it's just the psychology. Most gamers are all about seriousness, and think that a colorful game like Halo doesn't deserve the status it has. I mean, on the screens it looks like the most cheap sci-fi shooter, men in superarmor, little aliens in pink costumes etc. But what they don't know is how well-balanced it is for a game. I never had another shooter which I've played with so much pleasure. It was just unfair for it to be in a such a setting, yes. But nowadays the universe has expanded and all of the elements, gameplay or story or setting are too much blended together. So you guys either talk about Halo in a whole, or it isn't Halo anymore. :P
Like the people who paid 399$ for a PS3 and then 60$ for Killzone 2? yeah I'd be a little bitter too if I had wasted my money like that. PS: Itz funz 2 b ignorant!When you own a console as cheap as a 360, bought a game like Halo 3 with it, and then realize that you just wasted $59.99...I'm pretty sure you'd be in extreme denial and play that game all the time, as well.
drj077
[QUOTE="flacracker173"]200,00 isn't much considering it sold millions. 1 billion matches doesnt mean anything since it doesnt mention how many were incomplete or how long they lasted. If KZ2 has 1 min matches it would have 1 billion too.it has had 64,109 years playedThey all seem to think it is bad. But the 200,000 people who play it everyday and the 1 billion matches played online don't seem to think so.
Coolio10
you are wrong, over 1 million people play it every day, with around about 400,000 at peak times every day.They all seem to think it is bad. But the 200,000 people who play it everyday and the 1 billion matches played online don't seem to think so.
flacracker173
i dont laugh at them. i pity them. They are as respectable as people who think the earth is flat. nobody cares if you hate a game when it is so praised by critics and has awards to back it up. they are just bitter children. you will literaly never find an adult state garbage liek that unless their IQ is lower than 60 and cant think for themselves or look things up before saying somehting stupid like "this game sucks"
I laugh at people who don't give a reason as to why it's good. Horrible AI, weapon balance is a joke, story is generic even by fps standards, lack of mods for 3, kids screaming about chocolate milk over the chat constantly, and a not even 15 hours for the campaign. Considering the game was sold on "LOL FINISH THE FIGHT" it's pretty sad that it would be so short and suck as bad as it did. I've played all 3 of them (all 3 on console and 1 and 2 on pc) and would rank them 1>3>2 since 2 was the biggest joke of all of them. That aside it doesn't matter how many people play a game as to how good it is; if that was true wii sports should be the game of the generation since it outsold Mario.They all seem to think it is bad. But the 200,000 people who play it everyday and the 1 billion matches played online don't seem to think so.
flacracker173
[QUOTE="flacracker173"]I laugh at people who don't give a reason as to why it's good. Horrible AI, weapon balance is a joke, story is generic even by fps standards, lack of mods for 3, kids screaming about chocolate milk over the chat constantly, and a not even 15 hours for the campaign. Considering the game was sold on "LOL FINISH THE FIGHT" it's pretty sad that it would be so short and suck as bad as it did. I've played all 3 of them (all 3 on console and 1 and 2 on pc) and would rank them 1>3>2 since 2 was the biggest joke of all of them. That aside it doesn't matter how many people play a game as to how good it is; if that was true wii sports should be the game of the generation since it outsold Mario. ironically its not the ones who have critics and awards backing them that need to give any reason. its bitter kids like you who HAVE no reason and no evidence besides your superiority complex. move along you impossible child.They all seem to think it is bad. But the 200,000 people who play it everyday and the 1 billion matches played online don't seem to think so.
Whiteblade999
Yeah, its quite sad that almost two years after release, haters still havent got over Halo. Must be quite the compliment to Bungie, seeing their game get compared to just released shooters like Killzone 2.-DrRobotnik-What? There is no comparison between the two. Totally different. If I'm not mistaken, when the score for KZ2 came out it was the Lems who were bringing up H3.
I don't hate Halo 3, but I don't think it is anything special like lemmings would have you believe. It is just a average shooter.
Halo 3 sucks, not as bad as 2, but way worse than 1.
100million people could play crap in a box, doesnt make it a great game.
warmaster670
In your eyes, sure. But the critical reception for the game states the contrary, coupled with the fact that it's the most played online console game, I think you're running into some pretty strong evidence that not everyone feels the same way you do.
[QUOTE="Whiteblade999"][QUOTE="ArchDeathK"] ironically its not the ones who have critics and awards backing them that need to give any reason. its bitter kids like you who HAVE no reason and no evidence besides your superiority complex. move along you impossible child.ArchDeathKI can see you didn't read my post. Move along now blind lemming. this is how i know, you have no argument. 1. you pretend that others didn't read your post and that means that they obviously are wrong or havent seen the light. 2. you used the childish little name calling you've all assigned to yourselves. THAT tells me that you haven't the slightest clue what your talking about, because that IS your argument. that others are wrong because they are associated with what you think is a "lemming". guess what KID, because thats exactly what you are, you are absolutely our of your place when it comes to these arguments. nobody is blind but you because i obviously could read reviews, awards, and praise. i don't try to pass off utter BULL **** as fact. This isnt an opinion thing. this is YOU ARE WRONG with those claims, and others are NOT. the ONLY possible thing you can say about halo 3 is that YOU PERSONALLY did not have a good experience with the game. what you DON'T do, is strip apart the game and blame everything.
Why can't I strip a game apart? Last time I checked it's system wars and the argument is valid unless your telling me to only go by what the awards say, which is what it amounts to from your past post. Flaws in a game need to be addressed and said instead of the usual LOL SCORE AND GRAPHICS is all that matters. I only used lemming since its the system wars phrase for 360 kiddie but hey, take it how you want. I'm not blaming everything by the way, I could name a few positive things about it but I could also name a few positive things about superman 64 which doesn't make it a good game.
Sorry, I really can't stop myself. :(
[QUOTE="flacracker173"]I laugh at people who don't give a reason as to why it's good. Horrible AI, weapon balance is a joke, story is generic even by fps standards, lack of mods for 3, kids screaming about chocolate milk over the chat constantly, and a not even 15 hours for the campaign. Considering the game was sold on "LOL FINISH THE FIGHT" it's pretty sad that it would be so short and suck as bad as it did. I've played all 3 of them (all 3 on console and 1 and 2 on pc) and would rank them 1>3>2 since 2 was the biggest joke of all of them. That aside it doesn't matter how many people play a game as to how good it is; if that was true wii sports should be the game of the generation since it outsold Mario. - Horrible AI? I don't think it's anything special but it's sure as hell not 'horrible' imo. - It may be the standard, 'gai kills loads of aleins' affair, but you could say the same about Mass Effect and Half Life 2, both of which are considered to have excellent stories. It may be generic but it's still well done imo. The characters could of been better though. - Screaming kids? Two words. Mute, button. But anyway, I've found that to be a generalization. - The campaign was long enough considering the co-op, skulls and scoring mode and massive mp mode. Besides, it's not as if most shooters these days have campaigns 15 hours long. Hell, Half Life 2's only took me 10 hours or so and I still consider that the best FPS of all time. - I agree about the sales thing, I would never judge a game by how many people have bought it. The AAA reviews would be a better indicator of its quality.They all seem to think it is bad. But the 200,000 people who play it everyday and the 1 billion matches played online don't seem to think so.
Whiteblade999
this is how i know, you have no argument. 1. you pretend that others didn't read your post and that means that they obviously are wrong or havent seen the light. 2. you used the childish little name calling you've all assigned to yourselves. THAT tells me that you haven't the slightest clue what your talking about, because that IS your argument. that others are wrong because they are associated with what you think is a "lemming". guess what KID, because thats exactly what you are, you are absolutely our of your place when it comes to these arguments. nobody is blind but you because i obviously could read reviews, awards, and praise. i don't try to pass off utter BULL **** as fact. This isnt an opinion thing. this is YOU ARE WRONG with those claims, and others are NOT. the ONLY possible thing you can say about halo 3 is that YOU PERSONALLY did not have a good experience with the game. what you DON'T do, is strip apart the game and blame everything.[QUOTE="ArchDeathK"][QUOTE="Whiteblade999"] I can see you didn't read my post. Move along now blind lemming.Whiteblade999
Why can't I strip a game apart? Last time I checked it's system wars and the argument is valid unless your telling me to only go by what the awards say, which is what it amounts to from your past post. Flaws in a game need to be addressed and said instead of the usual LOL SCORE AND GRAPHICS is all that matters. I only used lemming since its the system wars phrase for 360 kiddie but hey, take it how you want. I'm not blaming everything by the way, I could name a few positive things about it but I could also name a few positive things about superman 64 which doesn't make it a good game.
i am SO sick of you. why cant you strip a game apart to address its flaws? because according to you, so much of it is a flaw. and by some goddamn magic those flaws gave it AAA status everywhere and allowed it to be one of the most respected franchises in gaming history. that isn't an opinion. that is a simple fact. Its a triple A franchise your trying to rip apart and trying to label as flawed. heres the thing though. it isn't flawed. your argument is. im laughing at you now because im just thinking of how you can possibly ignore everything, say something like "could also name a few positive things about superman 64 which doesn't make it a good game." as though your comparing it to halo 3. What exactly makes a game TRIPLE A STATUS? negativity? halo obviously has too much positivity going for it in EVERY department in order for it to have done what it has done. so why don't you explain to me how these "negativities" only you can apparently see, take a game and turn it from excellence to mediocre or just "average". please explain to me your master plan about how everyone is wrong and you are right because YOU didn't have a good experience with the game, if AT ALL. actually don't even try, your just not a very bright individual to begin with. frankly you should have your connection removed so the rest of the world doesn't have to suffer one more illogical, irrational, and self-important human being. "360 kiddie" that deserves a LOL and so do all your nonsensical points. heres a tip for you, next time you go into a thread, say this "I didnt like the game personally" it sums your feelings up quickly, and in an intelligent manner. I know its above what you can muster but you can try. maybe if you study that damn sentence for a few nights you could memorize it. id advise queue cards though. quite a few.[QUOTE="-DrRobotnik-"]Yeah, its quite sad that almost two years after release, haters still havent got over Halo. Must be quite the compliment to Bungie, seeing their game get compared to just released shooters like Killzone 2.ChuteboxWhat? There is no comparison between the two. Totally different. If I'm not mistaken, when the score for KZ2 came out it was the Lems who were bringing up H3.
This, is true.
[QUOTE="flacracker173"]I laugh at people who don't give a reason as to why it's good. Horrible AI, weapon balance is a joke, story is generic even by fps standards, lack of mods for 3, kids screaming about chocolate milk over the chat constantly, and a not even 15 hours for the campaign. Considering the game was sold on "LOL FINISH THE FIGHT" it's pretty sad that it would be so short and suck as bad as it did. I've played all 3 of them (all 3 on console and 1 and 2 on pc) and would rank them 1>3>2 since 2 was the biggest joke of all of them. That aside it doesn't matter how many people play a game as to how good it is; if that was true wii sports should be the game of the generation since it outsold Mario. - Horrible AI? I don't think it's anything special but it's sure as hell not 'horrible' imo. - It may be the standard, 'gai kills loads of aleins' affair, but you could say the same about Mass Effect and Half Life 2, both of which are considered to have excellent stories. It may be generic but it's still well done imo. The characters could of been better though. - Screaming kids? Two words. Mute, button. But anyway, I've found that to be a generalization. - The campaign was long enough considering the co-op, skulls and scoring mode and massive mp mode. Besides, it's not as if most shooters these days have campaigns 15 hours long. Hell, Half Life 2's only took me 10 hours or so and I still consider that the best FPS of all time. - I agree about the sales thing, I would never judge a game by how many people have bought it. The AAA reviews would be a better indicator of it's quality. thats the funny thing though. the one thing that should tell a games quality (scores and awards) he choses to IGNORE. and the fact that we are arguing with him just cements his delusion even further. that WE are all delusional and that his life's mission is to share "the truth".They all seem to think it is bad. But the 200,000 people who play it everyday and the 1 billion matches played online don't seem to think so.
Whiteblade999
Halo 3 is a fairly good game. What I don't understand is what makes it so good that it deserves to out score most clasic FPS games? It really isn't that amazing for what it is, so I don't see what it has done to deserve it's 9.5 score here. It's the same with MGS4, which is good, but it's not pushing the boundaries of the series, the new warzones were a nice feature, but it's a very gradual progression for it to have a full 10/10 slapped on it. I just don't understand how a 6 or so hour long game, with a popular, but not exactly astounding, multiplayer can score anything over a 9. I don't understand what the critics are thinking to be honest, it deserved atleast a point off for those terrible flood levels.
Well Halo 3 stills the king of console FPS,the multiplayer is amazing too much fun.. is one of the reasons to own Halo 3 and the only game on ps3 that comes close but stills far is Resistance 2.McdonaIdsGuythats, again, just your opinion. i find resistance 2 and killzone 2 much more fun than halo 3 because i just don't like its style. and there are many fps out there with equal if not better mp.
1 billion people could buy Britney Spears' new album that doesn't make it good. Zoso-8Difference is Britney Spears new album didn't get AAA/AAAA reviews almost everywhere.
Yeah, it's stupid considering that Halo invented FPS.404-not-foundUhhh...they never invented the FPS...Return To Castle Wolfenstein did...XD But Halo set the standard for console FPSes, and got them really going after Goldeneye on the N64 started them off. Still an amazing game, like you said though. =)
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment