wow, cows sure are taking this list pretty hard.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
yes it is, because ps3 is better than 360 and the wii. (no fanboyism here) seriously.sethman410
Of course not.
Nothing wrong with 360 being ahead of dreamcast... better controller.. MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH more games.... better online (despite the rip off price) and wasnt a failure. How the dreamcast is ahead of the ps3.... now that instantly makes the list a failure. Im sure they have there fanboy nostalgic reasons...[QUOTE="campzor"][QUOTE="XVision84"]
Lol what? 360 ahead of Dreamcast? PS2 number 3? Wii is number 10? This list is awful.
XVision84
Dreamcast was a great console IMO with a lot of great games. Dreamcast was also much more innovative at the time, so to me; Dreamcast would be ahead of the 360. Not by much though since at the top would be NES, PS2, SNES, PS1, etc.
Agree 100% It had a lot of potential to do great things. The VMU within the controller was cool. Plus it had Skies Of Arcadia one of the best RPGs ever.1. N64
2.SNES
3. PS1
How did the 360 make this list? there is nothing that differentiates it from a PS3. And how did the Wii make this list it has 4 or 5 Excellent games and the others have loads?
[QUOTE="samanthademeste"]Er, even hermits wouldn't say pc, since you know...its a list of best consoles Fell right into the trap.What people are going to say:
Sheep: Why is the Gamecube not on this list?
Cows: Why is the PS3 not on this list?
Lemmings: Why is the first Xbox not on this list?
Hermits: Why is the PC not on this list?
kris9031998
IGN pfft, if with at least another year left in it and 360 doesn't top the list or at least top 3 :o then fail !! :P
[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="OB-47"]yes it is, because ps3 is better than 360 and the wii. (no fanboyism here) seriously. i'll agree with this. as a console, the wii is nothing more than a white gamecube and the 360 is an RROD machine. the PS3 is the most well-designed console out of the bunch.That's not funny at all.
princeofshapeir
It hasn't done anything significant. Sure you may prefer it, but 360 created a great online experience on consoles, an interface update that changed the life of consoles (meaning consoles can now fully change in their lifetime). Wii revoltuioned gaming, by making gaming mainstream and having fun motion controls that worked. PS3 has done nothing like that, it's just a solid consoles
1. NES
2. Atari 2600
3.PS2
4. SNES
5. Genesis
6. Xbox 360
7. PS1
8. Dreamcast
9. N64
10. Wii
What do you think, SW?
samanthademeste
i haven't read the article. If historical significance and original IPs on a system matter, then I can see this list as it it. If it's ONLY about the games, the PS2 wins and it's not even close.
The 360 is on that list because on-line console gaming wouldn't be where it is today if it weren't for MS and the 360 period! You can deny that all you want but it's the truth and that is why the 360 will always rate higher than the PS3 as far as contributions to gaming are concerned.i wouldnt put the 360 in the top ten. i think the 360's massive failure rate (by far the highest of any of the consoles on the list) should take it down quite a few notches. hardware reliability is an important factor.
arbitor365
There you have it folks, NES and Atari 2600 > Every console in this world. :lol: And why is there no PS3 here? Probably IGN trying to get more hits by being flamed by cows.Oil_rope_bombs
Ever heard of the expression For its time?
NES' revolutionary controller, the fact that it brought back gaming from the dead, its video game industrydefining 1st party games such as Super Mario Bros. and TLoZ set the standard for gaming period and an incredible lineup of 3rd party games will ensure that it will always stay nr 1.
No console ever is going to reach it because all innovations and amazing games will awlays be split between 3 consoles, it's not possible for one console to dominate like NES did; it was outstanding in literally all areas, for its time.
There you have it folks, NES and Atari 2600 > Every console in this world. :lol: And why is there no PS3 here? Probably IGN trying to get more hits by being flamed by cows.Oil_rope_bombsim guessing someones trying to get fired at IGN...i just cant think of anything else..
[QUOTE="Oil_rope_bombs"]There you have it folks, NES and Atari 2600 > Every console in this world. :lol: And why is there no PS3 here? Probably IGN trying to get more hits by being flamed by cows.SuperFlakeman
Ever heard of the expression For its time?
NES' revolutionary controller, the fact that it brought back gaming from the dead, its video game industrydefining 1st party games such as Super Mario Bros. and TLoZ set the standard for gaming period and an incredible lineup of 3rd party games will ensure that it will always stay nr 1.
No console ever is going to reach it because all innovations and amazing games will awlays be split between 3 consoles, it's not possible for one console to dominate like NES did; it was outstanding in literally all areas, for its time.
It also laid the groundwork for a lot of genres. Not only that, but it is the system that likely inspired a lot of todays top developers.
[QUOTE="SuperFlakeman"]
[QUOTE="Oil_rope_bombs"]There you have it folks, NES and Atari 2600 > Every console in this world. :lol: And why is there no PS3 here? Probably IGN trying to get more hits by being flamed by cows.Heirren
Ever heard of the expression For its time?
NES' revolutionary controller, the fact that it brought back gaming from the dead, its video game industrydefining 1st party games such as Super Mario Bros. and TLoZ set the standard for gaming period and an incredible lineup of 3rd party games will ensure that it will always stay nr 1.
No console ever is going to reach it because all innovations and amazing games will awlays be split between 3 consoles, it's not possible for one console to dominate like NES did; it was outstanding in literally all areas, for its time.
It also laid the groundwork for a lot of genres. Not only that, but it is the system that likely inspired a lot of todays top developers.
Yeah I don't get it ay. PS3 hasn't done anything revolutionary or great. I've said this many times, it's just a solid console. What makes it so great?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment