This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="sanim02"]There will be a meltdown...Man if inFamous 2 managed to flop so bad, ( :lol: ), wonder what will happen to Uncharted 3..:shock:
mitu123
Resistance 3, Uncharted 3, Twisted Metal... Humble it up cows, yall still got 6 months left.:P ... Then again it's not like the lems got much to begin with thus far.. It's been half a year and it's still 0 under the 360 exclusives.:P
[QUOTE="tryagainlater"]
Wow, I'll accept my ownage here. I thought it would get a 9.0. When reviews started coming in, I'd thought it would get an 8.0 at the lowest. Oh well, I think the game looks great and I enjoyed the demo so I'll keep my preorder. Still, I'm surprised.
omho88
Dude, it's not ur fault .... the reviewer is so wrong on this one considering the score of the first and what we saw so far from the 2nd.
did you really just say that? :|
[QUOTE="chewy130"]Do you have the game too? Thats kinda how I feel as well. I do agree with some of the complaints, but I also would argue that inFamous 2 was a big step up from 1.The GS review is a disappointment, I respect GS reviews but now i'll need to reevaluate.
Infamous 2 was superior in every aspect to it's predecessor, which got a 9, but it received a 7.5? This is absurd. COD and Madden gets released every year with the exact same content/material yet they receive a consistently good review.
dragonball3900
Yeah. From the demo, Infamous 2 was one of the few games that I thought actually made major improvements over its predescessor. Better graphics, gameplay, movement, visual etc. The GS review is a huge surprise for me..
Whatever, I'm still getting the game and it'll be a blast.
It was hyped AAA, GOTY actually.[QUOTE="Grawse"]
[QUOTE="SolidTy"]
That's the only version, lol. Wow, 7.5. It was hyped AA as the review came out in that other thread and in this thread...but if that 7.5 score by Mr. Tom McShea stands, that's that. I wish the same reviewers would play these games...ah well! :P
SolidTy
Incorrect, this game had AA HYPE, as fakeboys were doing their best, like every game to beef up 'da ownage'. It's still a flop though.
Also, SOCOM 4 manipulation was by factions attempting ownage, trying to push SOCOM hype high. I have screen caps of that poll and saw people trying to push SOCOM to get ownage as well. I have links on that affair and this one and I was apart of the whole thing. You got one side of a story, not the whole picture. There were many other games in SW history that me and a lot of users have spoken about in PMs about lol.
Socom 4 was a very weird case. :PEh well we don't know if Infamous 2 was hyped AAE or AAAE. (unless someone got screenshots) It did flop. (duh) :P No way a game like this would be hyped AE. :P
[QUOTE="sanim02"]
[QUOTE="FIipMode"] It's going to keep happening man, I've started to just deal with it and not put too much weight into reviews, I'm actually surprised at how little I care because i know I will love this like I loved the first, and now with UGC.finalfantasy94
It's even worse when it's just the second entry.:P I mean talk about improvements over the first, yet get bumped down by a s*** ton.:shock:
maybe sucker punch should have sent them to a spa:P
Speaking of Sucker Punch... THIS is truly one.:P
[QUOTE="tryagainlater"]
Wow, I'll accept my ownage here. I thought it would get a 9.0. When reviews started coming in, I'd thought it would get an 8.0 at the lowest. Oh well, I think the game looks great and I enjoyed the demo so I'll keep my preorder. Still, I'm surprised.
omho88
Dude, it's not ur fault .... the reviewer is so wrong on this one considering the score of the first and what we saw so far from the 2nd.
How can his opinion be wrong?[QUOTE="omho88"]
[QUOTE="tryagainlater"]
Wow, I'll accept my ownage here. I thought it would get a 9.0. When reviews started coming in, I'd thought it would get an 8.0 at the lowest. Oh well, I think the game looks great and I enjoyed the demo so I'll keep my preorder. Still, I'm surprised.
Dude, it's not ur fault .... the reviewer is so wrong on this one considering the score of the first and what we saw so far from the 2nd.
did you really just say that? :|
Yeah and I played the demo too .... any problem?[QUOTE="tryagainlater"]
Wow, I'll accept my ownage here. I thought it would get a 9.0. When reviews started coming in, I'd thought it would get an 8.0 at the lowest. Oh well, I think the game looks great and I enjoyed the demo so I'll keep my preorder. Still, I'm surprised.
omho88
Dude, it's not ur fault .... the reviewer is so wrong on this one considering the score of the first and what we saw so far from the 2nd.
I hope you're right. Scores in general haven't been that great. Maybe, my expectations were a bit high.[QUOTE="chewy130"]
The GS review is a disappointment, I respect GS reviews but now i'll need to reevaluate.
Infamous 2 was superior in every aspect to it's predecessor, which got a 9, but it received a 7.5? This is absurd. COD and Madden gets released every year with the exact same content/material yet they receive a consistently good review.
rumbalumba
i know, right?
he goes on to say that the Morality system is a joke, saying you can only have good and bad and nothing in between.
REALLY NOW? REALLY?! this is not an RPG! why does he think all this time, only a Good Cole or an Evil Cole has been advertised? EVERYONE knows that you can either be one of the two, and no one has been complaining about being in that 'grey area' you're talking about, Tom. i just dont buy the 'Morality system is a joke because i can only be a good or a bad cole and nothing in between' crap.
whattajoke.
Yup and he says infamous 1 felt mroe like a gray area in choices. What game was he playing? Part 1 made it clear what was bad and what was good. For example at the beggingin take all the food for urself and your 2 friends=jerk or sharing it with all the people=not a jerk its clear black and white theres no grey.
The Infamous series is officially the Crackdown series of the ps3. Both are sandbox comic-book style games, both had disappointing sequels, and both might go down as being the game that let them play the Halo or Uncharted beta.Karnage108
Eh in reality the game is scoring about the same as the first, I would hardly call that a disappointing sequel.
[QUOTE="SolidTy"]
[QUOTE="Grawse"]It was hyped AAA, GOTY actually.
Edit:Arch666 summed it up nicely. Same thing happened with Socom 4. Game was hyped AA then reviews come in then cows change the hype to A.timmy00
Incorrect, this game had AA HYPE, as fakeboys were doing their best, like every game to beef up 'da ownage'. It's still a flop though.
Also, SOCOM 4 manipulation was by factions attempting ownage, trying to push SOCOM hype high. I have screen caps of that poll and saw people trying to push SOCOM to get ownage as well. I have links on that affair and this one and I was apart of the whole thing. You got one side of a story, not the whole picture. There were many other games in SW history that me and a lot of users have spoken about in PMs about lol.
Socom 4 was a very weird case. :PEh well we don't know if Infamous 2 was hyped AAE or AAAE. (unless someone got screenshots) It did flop. (duh) :P No way a game like this would be hyped AE. :P
Of course it wasn't hyped AE. :P I wouldn't suggest that, but InFamous 2 certainly looks the flop. That is sometimes what happens when you get two different reviewers covering games. I guess Tom McShea is on to something...:P
I will PM you a link to show you Infamous 2 Hype, one second... :P You can't post HYPE links in threads these days, due to tampering, lol.
EDIT : SOCOM wasn't a very weird case at all, it was actually pretty typical of System Wars, all the way back to Splinter Cell Conviction, Alan Wake, and many, many other games. This is how it always is actually.
EDIT 2 : I was incorrect, TOM did review both games after checking (I remember Kevin V. For some reason)...so I guess Infamous 2 really let him down, lol. :P I covered that possibility though in red.
EDIT 3 : I sent some PM's out to specific members of SW with the Proof, including Timmy here. The reason I didn't post the proof in here, is because I've done this song and dance MANY TIMES before in MANY HYPE threads before in SW. Basically, the end result is I post the LINK OF OWNAGE, showing polls of SW HYPE, and then alt/bandodgers/fans of other machines go into those polls, tamper with the results to ensure a flop is incoming for their NONSystem of choice, and my PROOF to older polls is ruined.
Been there done that....I'm not going through that again, lol. In an effort to preserve that, I have specifically sent GS PM's to certain members of this thread, to show that there is indeed proof, and I also told them why I didn't post the links in here.
Of course, if there was a way to STOP A POLL from working when a game shipped, this wouldn't be an issue. but it is...as I've seen before. Sux guys and gals. :(
Also, it is a lot of work for nothing, since InFAMOUS was hyped AA, and it got A, so it's still a flop. I'm not going to work hard in this thread or care too much to prove it was AA HYPED when it's still a flop. If the game was AA scored I would put more effort forth, but this is for naught.
I've seen this in SPLINTER CELL CONVICTION THREADS, ALAN WAKE THREADS, HEAVY RAIN THREADS, and more...and SW has a longstanding tradition of doing this for years upon years.
THERE WILL BE A NEW WAY HYPE threads are going to be done, look forward to that in the coming months. It's time I try to help out in some way, although my power is limited. :)
Look forward to the GeoW3, Uncharted 3, and Resistance 3 threads in the NEAR FUTURE, and many more to come. It's time to put a stop to these shenanigans.
Oh well, Pokemon White got a 7.5 and it's probably one of my favorite games of all time.
"Oh noez the screen goes black and white when you get hit" It does the same thing in Uncharted 2.
"Oh noez the camera is bad" It wasn't that bad in the demo. It really didn't hurt the gameplay.
"Oh noez it feels exactly like the first one" Call of Duty? 9.0? Almost every year?!?
PhazonBlazer
This a million times.
If GS doesn't go after MW3 with the same complain and slaps a 8.5-9.0 there is going to be issues. Even the epic masterpiece Tales of Vesperia had GS complain about "too much like the previous games" on "the bad" list. Yet CoD manages to pull of the biggest rehashes in all of gaming and score 8.5-9.0 with barely any mention that it is actuallt the same game as last year.
[QUOTE="omho88"][QUOTE="tryagainlater"]
Wow, I'll accept my ownage here. I thought it would get a 9.0. When reviews started coming in, I'd thought it would get an 8.0 at the lowest. Oh well, I think the game looks great and I enjoyed the demo so I'll keep my preorder. Still, I'm surprised.
soulitane
Dude, it's not ur fault .... the reviewer is so wrong on this one considering the score of the first and what we saw so far from the 2nd.
How can his opinion be wrong?It just defies common sense .... first infamous, the glitchest game ever with so many to critisize was an AAA game, but the 2nd which is undoubtly better ( I played the dameo btw) scores A, I can understand an AA but an A ..... this is just rediculous.
flopFamous 2 sounds much better than inFlopmous 2, right?
Anyways, flopFamous 2 was actually hyped as GOTY by SW. Source.
alfredooo
flopFamous 2 does roll off the tongue easier
There will be a meltdown...[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="sanim02"]
Man if inFamous 2 managed to flop so bad, ( :lol: ), wonder what will happen to Uncharted 3..:shock:
sanim02
Resistance 3, Uncharted 3, Twisted Metal... Humble it up cows, yall still got 6 months left.:P ... Then again it's not like the lems got much to begin with thus far.. It's been half a year and it's still 0 under the 360 exclusives.:P
Exactly right...Embrace the flop dudes. *embraces Infamous2*...soooo good! ..Least it's a AE, which by the looks of it the 360 would kills for right about now. :lol: I will play this when it drops in price as I enjoyed the first game. It's just a win all the way around by golly![QUOTE="omho88"]
Dude, it's not ur fault .... the reviewer is so wrong on this one considering the score of the first and what we saw so far from the 2nd.
did you really just say that? :|
Yeah and I played the demo too .... any problem? I think the reviewer actually played the full game or something.The Infamous series is officially the Crackdown series of the ps3. Both are sandbox comic-book style games, both had disappointing sequels, and both might go down as being the game that let them play the Halo or Uncharted beta.Karnage108
Yea cant agree with that.
Socom 4 was a very weird case. :P[QUOTE="timmy00"]
[QUOTE="SolidTy"]
Incorrect, this game had AA HYPE, as fakeboys were doing their best, like every game to beef up 'da ownage'. It's still a flop though.
Also, SOCOM 4 manipulation was by factions attempting ownage, trying to push SOCOM hype high. I have screen caps of that poll and saw people trying to push SOCOM to get ownage as well. I have links on that affair and this one and I was apart of the whole thing. You got one side of a story, not the whole picture. There were many other games in SW history that me and a lot of users have spoken about in PMs about lol.
SolidTy
Eh well we don't know if Infamous 2 was hyped AAE or AAAE. (unless someone got screenshots) It did flop. (duh) :P No way a game like this would be hyped AE. :P
Of course it wasn't hyped AE. :P I wouldn't suggest that, but InFamous 2 certainly looks the flop. That is sometimes what happens when you get two different reviewers covering games. I guess Tom McShea is on to something...OR, he didn't like InFAMOUS 1 very much. We don't know Tom's score of InFamous, and telling us now wouldn't matter anyways. :P
I will PM you a link to show you Infamous 2 Hype, one second... :P You can't post HYPE links in threads these days, due to tampering, lol.
Still do it for the lolz anyways. :o:P
How can his opinion be wrong?[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="omho88"]
Dude, it's not ur fault .... the reviewer is so wrong on this one considering the score of the first and what we saw so far from the 2nd.
omho88
It just defies common sense .... first infamous, the glitchest game ever with so many to critisize was an AAA game, but the 2nd which is undoubtly better ( I played the dameo btw) scores A, I can understand an AA but an A ..... this is just rediculous.
You didn't answer my question. It's his opinion that it's a 7.5 game. Obviously your opinion differs to his but that doesn't make his wrong.Oh well, Pokemon White got a 7.5 and it's probably one of my favorite games of all time.
"Oh noez the screen goes black and white when you get hit" It does the same thing in Uncharted 2.
"Oh noez the camera is bad" It wasn't that bad in the demo. It really didn't hurt the gameplay.
"Oh noez it feels exactly like the first one" Call of Duty? 9.0? Almost every year?!?
PhazonBlazer
If it were just those complaints, you might have a point, but he clearly talked about pacing issues and combat inbalance among other thngs. He pointed out many flaws, not just a few nitpicky flaws.
this game got a 9 on ign but a here on 7.5, ehhh. to bad i don't let reviewers dictate whether or not i enjoy or buy a title. This is still a day one buy.
It was hyped AAA, GOTY actually.[QUOTE="Grawse"]
[QUOTE="SolidTy"]
That's the only version, lol. Wow, 7.5. It was hyped AA as the review came out in that other thread and in this thread...but if that 7.5 score by Mr. Tom McShea stands, that's that. I wish the same reviewers would play these games...ah well! :P
SolidTy
Incorrect, this game had AA HYPE, as fakeboys (alt account lems, sheep, hermits, etc) were doing their best, like every game to beef up 'da ownage'. It's still a flop though. It happens with every big exclusive.
Also, SOCOM 4 manipulation was by factions attempting ownage, trying to push SOCOM hype high. zThe SOCOM SW story isn't correct at all, lol. I have screen caps of that poll and saw people trying to push SOCOM to get ownage as well. I don't even care that much anymore, but there is a bunch of users that knows and saw how it went down in a more accurate light. I have links on that affair and this one and I was apart of the whole thing. You got one side of a story, not the whole picture. There were many other games in SW history that me and a lot of users have spoken about in PMs about lol.
EDIT : Thinking about this more, I don't even care. Infamous 2 is a flop, and I didn't make the game, so whatever, lol. Good ol' Tom McShea, I wonder what he thought Infamous was... a 6.0? We won't know because he didn't review InFamous 1.
Who hypes a game AA when the first game was AAA? Oh yeah, people who have seen the reviews trickle in.[QUOTE="timmy00"]
[QUOTE="SolidTy"]
Incorrect, this game had AA HYPE, as fakeboys were doing their best, like every game to beef up 'da ownage'. It's still a flop though.
Also, SOCOM 4 manipulation was by factions attempting ownage, trying to push SOCOM hype high. I have screen caps of that poll and saw people trying to push SOCOM to get ownage as well. I have links on that affair and this one and I was apart of the whole thing. You got one side of a story, not the whole picture. There were many other games in SW history that me and a lot of users have spoken about in PMs about lol.
Socom 4 was a very weird case. :PEh well we don't know if Infamous 2 was hyped AAE or AAAE. (unless someone got screenshots) It did flop. (duh) :P No way a game like this would be hyped AE. :P
Of course it wasn't hyped AE. :P I wouldn't suggest that, but InFamous 2 certainly looks the flop. That is sometimes what happens when you get two different reviewers covering games. I guess Tom McShea is on to something...OR, he didn't like InFAMOUS 1 very much. We don't know Tom's score of InFamous, and telling us now wouldn't matter anyways. :P
I will PM you a link to show you Infamous 2 Hype, one second... :P You can't post HYPE links in threads these days, due to tampering, lol.
C'mon, king .... what difference does this make ? unless you are touched by the game score :P .How can his opinion be wrong?[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="omho88"]
Dude, it's not ur fault .... the reviewer is so wrong on this one considering the score of the first and what we saw so far from the 2nd.
omho88
It just defies common sense .... first infamous, the glitchest game ever with so many to critisize was an AAA game, but the 2nd which is undoubtly better ( I played the dameo btw) scores A, I can understand an AA but an A ..... this is just rediculous.
Did you read the review to see the complaints? Or playing the demo is enough to judge a game?[QUOTE="SolidTy"]
Incorrect, this game had AA HYPE, as fakeboys (alt account lems, sheep, hermits, etc) were doing their best, like every game to beef up 'da ownage'.
tagyhag
Damn that's quite the detective work there. :lol:
The game might have had AA hype in the end (because of the strategic voting), but the idea that this game never had AAA hype is ridiculous. The first game was an AAA, and this sequel looked improved in many ways. There was really no reason to hype it AA until reviews started rolling in.
lol dude awesome but its funny cause now we are getting reports of it was only hyped AA...:roll:Cows reaction to the score after seeing it
Everyone elses reaction after seeing the score that is sick of seeing cows talk about the year of the PS3.
rybe1025
Thanks for the laugh.Cows reaction to the score after seeing it
Everyone elses reaction after seeing the score that is sick of seeing cows talk about the year of the PS3.
rybe1025
Edited out 2nd image before rabbid fanboys report.
How can his opinion be wrong?soulitane
It just defies common sense .... first infamous, the glitchest game ever with so many to critisize was an AAA game, but the 2nd which is undoubtly better ( I played the dameo btw) scores A, I can understand an AA but an A ..... this is just rediculous.
You didn't answer my question. It's his opinion that it's a 7.5 game. Obviously your opinion differs to his but that doesn't make his wrong. when two opinions are very different, then one of them is closer to be being right .... the game was hyped AAA and the original was an AAA, Infamous2 looks like an AAA but suddenly it's an A !!!!!...... understand anything?I am genuinely surprised by this score, but until I play it myself, I think I disagree with the review. Morality system a joke? It sounds like it's almost the same as in the first game, and IGN's review said that there's two completely different endings, so to me it sounds like an improvement.
The only issues I had with the first game were the bad graphics and the lack of things to do once finished. inFamous 2 has clearly improved on both of those things so I don't see what the issue is. The doesn't look like a step back to me; this looks like a huge step forward.
[QUOTE="omho88"]
Dude, it's not ur fault .... the reviewer is so wrong on this one considering the score of the first and what we saw so far from the 2nd.
CaseyWegner
did you really just say that? :|
It's so funny how people are too cool for reviews, but will blithely accept whatever developers and advertising tell them.
Predictably, people are crying and nitpicking about the review because they have this preconceived notion that the 2nd game is better. Have you ever considered that the review doesn't think the 2nd game is better? :roll:
GreySeal9
Just some of his nipicks are werid like the "theres no gery choice liek there was in infamous 1" which is just bs since infamous didint make anything look grey it was clear if you were being a selfish evil jerk or not. So thats automatically tossed out the window. The whole black and white dieing thing seemed to bother him but it was in part one and in part 2 it doesitn seem more anoying or anything. Also again with the feels the same as part 1 as a negative complaint seems dumb to use when you let other pass when they do that. It just makes GS look foolish. If anything seems like he just wasint a huge fan of the characters and story this time around.
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]
[QUOTE="SolidTy"]
Incorrect, this game had AA HYPE, as fakeboys (alt account lems, sheep, hermits, etc) were doing their best, like every game to beef up 'da ownage'.
GreySeal9
Damn that's quite the detective work there. :lol:
The game might have had AA hype in the end (because of the strategic voting), but the idea that this game never had AAA hype is ridiculous. The first game was an AAA, and this sequel looked improved in many ways. There was really no reason to hype it AA until reviews started rolling in.
Meh, regardless of whether or not it had AAA hype, a flop is a flop no matter how anyone tries to spin it.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment