:P
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]
[QUOTE="SolidTy"]
Incorrect, this game had AA HYPE, as fakeboys (alt account lems, sheep, hermits, etc) were doing their best, like every game to beef up 'da ownage'.
GreySeal9
Damn that's quite the detective work there. :lol:
The game might have had AA hype in the end (because of the strategic voting), but the idea that this game never had AAA hype is ridiculous. The first game was an AAA, and this sequel looked improved in many ways. There was really no reason to hype it AA until reviews started rolling in.
Of course not,before the reviews started coming out this was hyped AAAE by the majority here and GOTY and all that,after the somewhat lower scores started coming then the hype sudenly descended to AAE just to make sure the game wouldn´t flop,and it still did! :lol:[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]
Damn that's quite the detective work there. :lol:
The_Game21x
The game might have had AA hype in the end (because of the strategic voting), but the idea that this game never had AAA hype is ridiculous. The first game was an AAA, and this sequel looked improved in many ways. There was really no reason to hype it AA until reviews started rolling in.
Meh, regardless of whether or not it had AAA hype, a flop is a flop no matter how anyone tries to spin it.
Big flop is a big flop, there are different levels of flops as you probably know.[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]Remember this is only the reviewer opinion.soulitaneIt seems some people don't know that :P
I know that but some people will somehow think it as a fact. Is it a fact it floped yup. Is it a fact its a terrible game nope.
[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]
Predictably, people are crying and nitpicking about the review because they have this preconceived notion that the 2nd game is better. Have you ever considered that the review doesn't think the 2nd game is better? :roll:
finalfantasy94
Just some of his nipicks are werid like the "theres no gery choice liek there was in infamous 1" which is just bs since infamous didint make anything look grey it was clear if you were being a selfish evil jerk or not. So thats automatically tossed out the window. The whole black and white dieing thing seemed to bother him but it was in part one and in part 2 it doesitn seem more anoying or anything. Also again with the feels the same as part 1 as a negative complaint seems dumb to use when you let other pass when they do that. It just makes GS look foolish. If anything seems like he just wasint a huge fan of the characters and story this time around.
Oh, here we go a game that you had some pre-conceived notion that it was going to be a masterpiece flopped, and the reviewer is everything from incompetent to foolish.Socom 4 was a very weird case. :P[QUOTE="timmy00"]
[QUOTE="SolidTy"]
Incorrect, this game had AA HYPE, as fakeboys were doing their best, like every game to beef up 'da ownage'. It's still a flop though.
Also, SOCOM 4 manipulation was by factions attempting ownage, trying to push SOCOM hype high. I have screen caps of that poll and saw people trying to push SOCOM to get ownage as well. I have links on that affair and this one and I was apart of the whole thing. You got one side of a story, not the whole picture. There were many other games in SW history that me and a lot of users have spoken about in PMs about lol.
SolidTy
Eh well we don't know if Infamous 2 was hyped AAE or AAAE. (unless someone got screenshots) It did flop. (duh) :P No way a game like this would be hyped AE. :P
Of course it wasn't hyped AE. :P I wouldn't suggest that, but InFamous 2 certainly looks the flop. That is sometimes what happens when you get two different reviewers covering games. I guess Tom McShea is on to something...OR, he didn't like InFAMOUS 1 very much. We don't know Tom's score of InFamous, and telling us now wouldn't matter anyways. :P
I will PM you a link to show you Infamous 2 Hype, one second... :P You can't post HYPE links in threads these days, due to tampering, lol.
Huh? Tom McShea reviewed both games, or am I misunderstanding what you are saying? He must have liked InFamous since he gave it a 9.0.
are people really trying to pretend this game was never hyped AAA? lawlessxApparently. Funny how quickly the hype for this game changed after the reviews started rolling in.
[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="omho88"]You didn't answer my question. It's his opinion that it's a 7.5 game. Obviously your opinion differs to his but that doesn't make his wrong. when two opinions are very different, then one of them is closer to be being right .... the game was hyped AAA and the original was an AAA, Infamous2 looks like an AAA but suddenly it's an A !!!!!...... understand anything? What am I meant to be understanding? That people can't have differing opinion? That's what it seems like you're trying to tell me, and that's completely false. If he thinks it deserved that score then good for him. Also hype doesn't mean squat in how quality a game is.It just defies common sense .... first infamous, the glitchest game ever with so many to critisize was an AAA game, but the 2nd which is undoubtly better ( I played the dameo btw) scores A, I can understand an AA but an A ..... this is just rediculous.
omho88
[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]
Predictably, people are crying and nitpicking about the review because they have this preconceived notion that the 2nd game is better. Have you ever considered that the review doesn't think the 2nd game is better? :roll:
finalfantasy94
Just some of his nipicks are werid like the "theres no gery choice liek there was in infamous 1" which is just bs since infamous didint make anything look grey it was clear if you were being a selfish evil jerk or not. So thats automatically tossed out the window. The whole black and white dieing thing seemed to bother him but it was in part one and in part 2 it doesitn seem more anoying or anything. Also again with the feels the same as part 1 as a negative complaint seems dumb to use when you let other pass when they do that. It just makes GS look foolish. If anything seems like he just wasint a huge fan of the characters and story this time around.
They really don't look foolish at all. While some of his complaints seemed a bit nitpicky, the majority of them seem legit.
Maybe he doesn't agree with you that the first game had completely black/white choices. Maybe he thought the choices were more blac
Yeah, he wasn't a fan of the characters and story, but he also wasn't a fan of the pacing, the combat inbalance, and other things.
It's interesting how when a game doesn't get the score a lot of people want, the reviewer is wrong. But when the reviewer gives an expected score, everyone is on the reviewer's side. I wonder what the world would be like if they're weren't any reviews at all. If people just bought games on their gut feeling. mrmusicman247
The thign is I read the review and the there are some things that stuck out that I questioned.
just because you don't like the review, doesn't mean a fanboy reviewed it. :lol:another 360 fan reviewing ps3 excluvies?
why?
ZoomZoom2490
[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"]It's interesting how when a game doesn't get the score a lot of people want, the reviewer is wrong. But when the reviewer gives an expected score, everyone is on the reviewer's side. I wonder what the world would be like if they're weren't any reviews at all. If people just bought games on their gut feeling. finalfantasy94
The thign is I read the review and the there are some things that stuck out that I questioned.
I haven't read it yet. What things stuck out?And here we go with the claims of bias. But I knew this was just a matter of time. :lol:another 360 fan reviewing ps3 excluvies?
why?
ZoomZoom2490
It's interesting how when a game doesn't get the score a lot of people want, the reviewer is wrong. But when the reviewer gives an expected score, everyone is on the reviewer's side. I wonder what the world would be like if they're weren't any reviews at all. If people just bought games on their gut feeling. mrmusicman247GS gives MGS4 a 10 - GS are a reliable source of information. GS gives xbox exclusive a high score or gives PS exclusive a low score - GS are the most unreliable website they have been brought out by M$ The reverse works aswell but its the cows day to be ridiculed.
I wonder what the world would be like if they're weren't any reviews at all. If people just bought games on their gut feeling. mrmusicman247The world would topple off its axis. Don't threaten us with such dangerous hypothetical questions.
[QUOTE="SolidTy"]
[QUOTE="timmy00"]Socom 4 was a very weird case. :P
Eh well we don't know if Infamous 2 was hyped AAE or AAAE. (unless someone got screenshots) It did flop. (duh) :P No way a game like this would be hyped AE. :P
coasterguy65
Of course it wasn't hyped AE. :P I wouldn't suggest that, but InFamous 2 certainly looks the flop. That is sometimes what happens when you get two different reviewers covering games. I guess Tom McShea is on to something...OR, he didn't like InFAMOUS 1 very much. We don't know Tom's score of InFamous, and telling us now wouldn't matter anyways. :P
I will PM you a link to show you Infamous 2 Hype, one second... :P You can't post HYPE links in threads these days, due to tampering, lol.
Huh? Tom McShea reviewed both games, or am I misunderstanding what you are saying? He must have liked InFamous since he gave it a 9.0.
Ha, that's funny man.It seems some people don't know that :P[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]Remember this is only the reviewer opinion.finalfantasy94
I know that but some people will somehow think it as a fact. Is it a fact it floped yup. Is it a fact its a terrible game nope.
Of course it's not a bad game, but when someone says his opinion is wrong then I don't agree with that :P[QUOTE="SolidTy"]
Incorrect, this game had AA HYPE, as fakeboys (alt account lems, sheep, hermits, etc) were doing their best, like every game to beef up 'da ownage'.
tagyhag
Damn that's quite the detective work there. :lol:
With a flop like this, it calls for the most extreme of the extreme to sleuth around for those evil doers.So glad this flopped and flopped hard, so much for teh year of ps3 aaae's, it will have just as many aaae's as the 360, the 360 with more Aaa's overall with witcher2 announced, once again lems didn't talk, they just wait for results, so happy it's a bust!Timdoggamer
yea so now you can sleep better since GS didint give the game a high score. That sounds pretty sad.
Regardless, by SW rules it flopped. Who gives a crap about I it "flopped" here when ever other site has given this fame a Better score. The demo is awesome! I feel bad for the people who live or die by gs scores alone. They will be missin out on a great game. If u loved the first game you owe it to yourself to get this ... Period. Review was flawed. I am still gettin the game day 1 like I have with countless other games gs didn't like. I just don't ge people who only go by gs for there game buying decisions.[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]Remember this is only the reviewer opinion.nervmeister
How can his opinion be wrong?soulitane
It just defies common sense .... first infamous, the glitchest game ever with so many to critisize was an AAA game, but the 2nd which is undoubtly better ( I played the dameo btw) scores A, I can understand an AA but an A ..... this is just rediculous.
Did you read the review to see the complaints? Or playing the demo is enough to judge a game? I actually read it and he was nitpicking .... the moral system is laughable ?!!!! seriously, the first game suffered the same thing, I only found my decisions to impact the game greatly in just two occasions, but the I still liked it ..... I dun even know what does uneven pacing means, all I understood he wanted the sewer sections back !!!!! Of course playing the demo isn't enough but I wouldn't change my mind from AAA to an A if I played the final game.[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"]It's interesting how when a game doesn't get the score a lot of people want, the reviewer is wrong. But when the reviewer gives an expected score, everyone is on the reviewer's side. I wonder what the world would be like if they're weren't any reviews at all. If people just bought games on their gut feeling. finalfantasy94
The thign is I read the review and the there are some things that stuck out that I questioned.
Do you question the good bits?due to lack of x360 exclusives im really starting to wonder if NA sources are flopping ps3 exclusives on purpose just so it can stay in the race with multiplat games.
maybe ms is asking them to do it, who knows.
I'm still hyping this game to be a personal AAAE. There's no way inFAMOUS 2 is worse than the Sly trilogy and Uncharted 2
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment