It did not take one year for the 360 to get a "good" game

Every day I see people saying that the "PS3 just came out. Give it time. The 360 took a year to get its first good game."

If this is the case, then the PS3 truly has nothing. The PS3's highest rated game is Resistance with an 8.6 score. The 360 launched with three exclusives that scored higher. Do you still even want to compare what the PS3 has now against what the 360 had seven months into its lifespan? Are you really willing to say that your own system has nothing in order to say that the system you oppose took a year to get something worthy?

This argument didn't work for the original Xbox ("The PS2 had a one year head start. That's why its game library is better. /cry) and it's not working now for the PS3. The PS2 had a better lineup in its first year than the Xbox did. The 360 had a better first seven months than the PS3 did.

CaseyWegner

First off, I mean come on Kameo, Project 0 and Call of Duty 2. Resistance beats every single one of them hands down, the fact GS didn't rate it higher, might make room for a discussion wether you should have more than 1 reviewer, because this guy obviously didn't get the greatness of this game. Resistance IS the best console-FPS period.

Second, the PS3 has great titles out right now, with games like Resistance, Motorstorm, Oblivion(yes it's on both platforms, but that doesn't detract), MLB The Show and a bunch more multi-platform titles, which unless your one of those people who only likes on type of game, should keep you playing 'till the second wave of great games.

3rd, it did take the 360 a year before the release games actually ran without any problems, it was "glitchville", not to mention the unreliabillity of the 360 itself(mine died on me twice), and with Sony just reporting 1.000.000 consoles beeing sold in the PAL region alone, they're of to a great start, and things are only getting better, the PS2 gamers will upgrade to the PS3 soon enough, more and more studio's support the Blu-Ray over HD-DVD, so the PS3 is winning, and with MS's terrible trackrecord at actually outclassing the competition(usually they have to buy the competition to actually win a costumer base battle), THE PS3 WILL CRUSH THE 360!!!!

[QUOTE="shungokustasu"]This is the worst thread in System Wars.Verge_6

You think that about EVERY pro-360 thread, I'm sure.

Actually, I supported the Halo 3 will not flop threads, and XBL is the best online service for console. Of course I have to get my cheap shots in every now and then. Also, you just admitted this was a "pro-360" thread. Goes to show Casey 360 fanboyism.

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]

[QUOTE="shungokustasu"]This is the worst thread in System Wars.shungokustasu

You think that about EVERY pro-360 thread, I'm sure.

Actually, I supported the Halo 3 will not flop threads, and XBL is the best online service for console. Of course I have to get my cheap in every now and then. Also, you just admitted this was a "pro-360" thread. Goes to show Casey 360 fanboyism.

By 'pro-360 thread', I mean it is supporting the 360 agfainst claims by fanboys that it took a year for it to get a good game. You're starting to flip out man...

[QUOTE="shungokustasu"]This is the worst thread in System Wars.Verge_6

You think that about EVERY pro-360 thread, I'm sure.

Funny thing is this isn't a "pro-360" thread.  It is simply stating that some statements made on these forums are impossible according to forum rules.  Then came the whole reading comprehension problem and teh conspiracy thoughts.  

[QUOTE="darthogre"]

Why not just word it differently?

2FacedJanus

Because he didn't feel like taking into account that his post will be read by people with the mental capacity equivalent to that of a boiled egg? 

Like yourself?

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

Every day I see people saying that the "PS3 just came out. Give it time. The 360 took a year to get its first good game."

If this is the case, then the PS3 truly has nothing. The PS3's highest rated game is Resistance with an 8.6 score. The 360 launched with three exclusives that scored higher. Do you still even want to compare what the PS3 has now against what the 360 had seven months into its lifespan? Are you really willing to say that your own system has nothing in order to say that the system you oppose took a year to get something worthy?

This argument didn't work for the original Xbox ("The PS2 had a one year head start. That's why its game library is better. /cry) and it's not working now for the PS3. The PS2 had a better lineup in its first year than the Xbox did. The 360 had a better first seven months than the PS3 did.

Nene33

First off everyone knows GS structurally downgrades any title that isn't a 360 title, Resistance is the best FPS console shooter there is.

Second, the PS3 has great titles out right now, with games like Resistance, Motorstorm, Oblivion(yes it's on both platforms, but that doesn't detract), MLB The Show and a bunch more multi-platform titles, which unless your one of those people who only likes on type of game, should keep you playing 'till the second wave of great games.

3rd, it did take the 360 a year before the release games actually ran without any problems, it was "glitchville", not to mention the unreliabillity of the 360 itself(mine died on me twice), and with Sony just reporting 1.000.000 consoles beeing sold in the PAL region alone, they're of to a great start, and things are only getting better, the PS2 gamers will upgrade to the PS3 soon enough, more and more studio's support the Blu-Ray over HD-DVD, so the PS3 is winning, and with MS's terrible trackrecord at actually outclassing the competition(usually they have to buy the competition to actually win a costumer base battle), THE PS3 WILL CRUSH THE 360!!!!

Stop reading right there.  You guys and teh conspiracy theories are just plain silly. 

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

Every day I see people saying that the "PS3 just came out. Give it time. The 360 took a year to get its first good game."

If this is the case, then the PS3 truly has nothing. The PS3's highest rated game is Resistance with an 8.6 score. The 360 launched with three exclusives that scored higher. Do you still even want to compare what the PS3 has now against what the 360 had seven months into its lifespan? Are you really willing to say that your own system has nothing in order to say that the system you oppose took a year to get something worthy?

This argument didn't work for the original Xbox ("The PS2 had a one year head start. That's why its game library is better. /cry) and it's not working now for the PS3. The PS2 had a better lineup in its first year than the Xbox did. The 360 had a better first seven months than the PS3 did.

Nene33

First off everyone knows GS structurally downgrades any title that isn't a 360 title, Resistance is the best FPS console shooter there is.

gamespot, you say? run over to gamerankings and tell me what score you see for resistance.

[QUOTE="2FacedJanus"][QUOTE="darthogre"]

Why not just word it differently?

Sacred-Snow

Because he didn't feel like taking into account that his post will be read by people with the mental capacity equivalent to that of a boiled egg?

Like yourself?

So where did you extract that piece of information from? I understood perfectly what he meant, I understood perfectly that he went by SW rules. 

Quite frankly, that little two word post was entirely uncalled for, but I guess you're just unable to find anything better to post, so you randomly attack someone whom you think is an open-door for you. Did I hurt your feelings in the past? For your sake I hope so, because otherwise, you just make no sense, whatsoever.

Then again, what else is new in system wars. 

[QUOTE="Nene33"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

Every day I see people saying that the "PS3 just came out. Give it time. The 360 took a year to get its first good game."

If this is the case, then the PS3 truly has nothing. The PS3's highest rated game is Resistance with an 8.6 score. The 360 launched with three exclusives that scored higher. Do you still even want to compare what the PS3 has now against what the 360 had seven months into its lifespan? Are you really willing to say that your own system has nothing in order to say that the system you oppose took a year to get something worthy?

This argument didn't work for the original Xbox ("The PS2 had a one year head start. That's why its game library is better. /cry) and it's not working now for the PS3. The PS2 had a better lineup in its first year than the Xbox did. The 360 had a better first seven months than the PS3 did.

CaseyWegner

First off everyone knows GS structurally downgrades any title that isn't a 360 title, Resistance is the best FPS console shooter there is.

gamespot, you say? run over to gamerankings and tell me what score you see for resistance.

Cakeordeath and myself have been saying this multiple times, but we are always ALWAYS ignored. :?

[QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="Verge_6"]

[QUOTE="shungokustasu"]This is the worst thread in System Wars.Verge_6

You think that about EVERY pro-360 thread, I'm sure.

Actually, I supported the Halo 3 will not flop threads, and XBL is the best online service for console. Of course I have to get my cheap in every now and then. Also, you just admitted this was a "pro-360" thread. Goes to show Casey 360 fanboyism.

By 'pro-360 thread', I mean it is supporting the 360 agfainst claims by fanboys that it took a year for it to get a good game. You're starting to flip out man...

It's not me. It's this thread. It got me bambozzle. It makes no sense to me. I still don't get the point of it. It's 12 pages of misunderstanding from the original post. The OP was too vague, and then he want to act like it was plain and simple. I'm sorry, I'm not the crazy one here. 

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]

[QUOTE="shungokustasu"]This is the worst thread in System Wars.shungokustasu

You think that about EVERY pro-360 thread, I'm sure.

Actually, I supported the Halo 3 will not flop threads, and XBL is the best online service for console. Of course I have to get my cheap shots in every now and then. Also, you just admitted this was a "pro-360" thread. Goes to show Casey 360 fanboyism.

so i make a thread against the 360's number one hyped game and nothing...

i make one in favor of the 360 using only system wars facts to back it up and now i'm a 360 fanboy despite not even owning a 360? :|

[QUOTE="2FacedJanus"][QUOTE="darthogre"]

Why not just word it differently?

Sacred-Snow

Because he didn't feel like taking into account that his post will be read by people with the mental capacity equivalent to that of a boiled egg?

Like yourself?

This doesn't exactly make you seem intelligent either. 

[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="Verge_6"]

[QUOTE="shungokustasu"]This is the worst thread in System Wars.shungokustasu

You think that about EVERY pro-360 thread, I'm sure.

Actually, I supported the Halo 3 will not flop threads, and XBL is the best online service for console. Of course I have to get my cheap in every now and then. Also, you just admitted this was a "pro-360" thread. Goes to show Casey 360 fanboyism.

By 'pro-360 thread', I mean it is supporting the 360 agfainst claims by fanboys that it took a year for it to get a good game. You're starting to flip out man...

It's not me. It's this thread. It got me bambozzle. It makes no sense to me. I still don't get the point of it. It's 12 pages of misunderstanding from the original post. The OP was too vague, and then he want to act like it was plain and simple. I'm sorry, I'm not the crazy one here.

The OP was quite clear.  I think your devotion to Sony clouded your reading ability and you also forgot we are in SW, so SW rules apply.  Lesson learned. :) 

[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="Verge_6"]

[QUOTE="shungokustasu"]This is the worst thread in System Wars.shungokustasu

You think that about EVERY pro-360 thread, I'm sure.

Actually, I supported the Halo 3 will not flop threads, and XBL is the best online service for console. Of course I have to get my cheap in every now and then. Also, you just admitted this was a "pro-360" thread. Goes to show Casey 360 fanboyism.

By 'pro-360 thread', I mean it is supporting the 360 agfainst claims by fanboys that it took a year for it to get a good game. You're starting to flip out man...

It's not me. It's this thread. It got me bambozzle. It makes no sense to me. I still don't get the point of it. It's 12 pages of misunderstanding from the original post. The OP was too vague, and then he want to act like it was plain and simple. I'm sorry, I'm not the crazy one here.

...it is as clear as crystal, WHAT is there not to get? 

Cakeordeath and myself have been saying this multiple times, but we are always ALWAYS ignored. :?

Verge_6

Well, duh, that's the essence of discussion here: Bombard your opponent with the same argument over and over again, and simply ignore any arguments against you!

This is System Wars.....

*random thought of Casey dressed as a spartan standing against a violator of rules: "THIS IS SYSTEMWARS!" followed by kicking said violator into the pit off bannage* 

The OP was quite clear. I think your devotion to Sony clouded your reading ability and you also forgot we are in SW, so SW rules apply. Lesson learned. :)

dhjohns

Agreed. 

Wow still going lol - A bit off topic but, Casey; I figured since you created two controversial ( but factual ) threads that got both 360 & PS3 fans going, today I would see a similar approach on the subject of the Wii - lol ;)SecretPolice

Agreed!  Something like the Wii isn't a proven console until it gets good games. :lol:  j/k 

            Wow still going lol - A bit off topic but, Casey; I figured since you created two controversial ( but factual ) threads that got both 360 & PS3 fans going, today I would see a similar approach on the subject of the Wii - lol ;)SecretPolice

i'm not really sure what to do about the wii. it's the least bashed console and its fanbase is also the quietest. cause and effect, maybe.

[QUOTE="Sacred-Snow"][QUOTE="2FacedJanus"][QUOTE="darthogre"]

Why not just word it differently?

2FacedJanus

Because he didn't feel like taking into account that his post will be read by people with the mental capacity equivalent to that of a boiled egg?

Like yourself?

So where did you extract that piece of information from? I understood perfectly what he meant, I understood perfectly that he went by SW rules. 

Quite frankly, that little two word post was entirely uncalled for, but I guess you're just unable to find anything better to post, so you randomly attack someone whom you think is an open-door for you. Did I hurt your feelings in the past? For your sake I hope so, because otherwise, you just make no sense, whatsoever.

Then again, what else is new in system wars. 

It could be, that because I posted a thread somewhta like this just yesterday, stating that I preffered shooters on the 360 over RPGs, and then a mass of lemmings attacked my thread and said, 'there are more then shooters on the 360 retard and you just came across to me as a typical Lemming, so I vented any anger I had from yesterday unto you, which i shouldn't have.

[QUOTE="Nene33"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

Every day I see people saying that the "PS3 just came out. Give it time. The 360 took a year to get its first good game."

If this is the case, then the PS3 truly has nothing. The PS3's highest rated game is Resistance with an 8.6 score. The 360 launched with three exclusives that scored higher. Do you still even want to compare what the PS3 has now against what the 360 had seven months into its lifespan? Are you really willing to say that your own system has nothing in order to say that the system you oppose took a year to get something worthy?

This argument didn't work for the original Xbox ("The PS2 had a one year head start. That's why its game library is better. /cry) and it's not working now for the PS3. The PS2 had a better lineup in its first year than the Xbox did. The 360 had a better first seven months than the PS3 did.

CaseyWegner

First off everyone knows GS structurally downgrades any title that isn't a 360 title, Resistance is the best FPS console shooter there is.

gamespot, you say? run over to gamerankings and tell me what score you see for resistance.

You might have noticed the score was WE 8.6, YOU 8.7 and THEY 8.8.

As you might also have noticed Kameo(1 of your higher rated examples) WE 8.7, YOU 8.6 THEY 8.1, WHICH MEANS EVERYBODY EXCEPT GS THINKS RESISTANCE WAS BETTER.

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="Nene33"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

Every day I see people saying that the "PS3 just came out. Give it time. The 360 took a year to get its first good game."

If this is the case, then the PS3 truly has nothing. The PS3's highest rated game is Resistance with an 8.6 score. The 360 launched with three exclusives that scored higher. Do you still even want to compare what the PS3 has now against what the 360 had seven months into its lifespan? Are you really willing to say that your own system has nothing in order to say that the system you oppose took a year to get something worthy?

This argument didn't work for the original Xbox ("The PS2 had a one year head start. That's why its game library is better. /cry) and it's not working now for the PS3. The PS2 had a better lineup in its first year than the Xbox did. The 360 had a better first seven months than the PS3 did.

Nene33

First off everyone knows GS structurally downgrades any title that isn't a 360 title, Resistance is the best FPS console shooter there is.

gamespot, you say? run over to gamerankings and tell me what score you see for resistance.

You might have noticed the score was WE 8.6, YOU 8.7 and THEY 8.8.

As you might also have noticed Kameo(1 of your higher rated examples) WE 8.7, YOU 8.6 THEY 8.1, WHICH MEANS EVERYBODY EXCEPT GS THINKS RESISTANCE WAS BETTER.

This...this is just sad... 

You might have noticed the score was WE 8.6, YOU 8.7 and THEY 8.8.

As you might also have noticed Kameo(1 of your higher rated examples) WE 8.7, YOU 8.6 THEY 8.1, WHICH MEANS EVERYBODY EXCEPT GS THINKS RESISTANCE WAS BETTER.

Nene33

as an act of mercy, i'm going to let you rethink that post before i reply to it.

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="Nene33"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

Every day I see people saying that the "PS3 just came out. Give it time. The 360 took a year to get its first good game."

If this is the case, then the PS3 truly has nothing. The PS3's highest rated game is Resistance with an 8.6 score. The 360 launched with three exclusives that scored higher. Do you still even want to compare what the PS3 has now against what the 360 had seven months into its lifespan? Are you really willing to say that your own system has nothing in order to say that the system you oppose took a year to get something worthy?

This argument didn't work for the original Xbox ("The PS2 had a one year head start. That's why its game library is better. /cry) and it's not working now for the PS3. The PS2 had a better lineup in its first year than the Xbox did. The 360 had a better first seven months than the PS3 did.

Nene33

First off everyone knows GS structurally downgrades any title that isn't a 360 title, Resistance is the best FPS console shooter there is.

gamespot, you say? run over to gamerankings and tell me what score you see for resistance.

You might have noticed the score was WE 8.6, YOU 8.7 and THEY 8.8.

As you might also have noticed Kameo(1 of your higher rated examples) WE 8.7, YOU 8.6 THEY 8.1, WHICH MEANS EVERYBODY EXCEPT GS THINKS RESISTANCE WAS BETTER.

I wasn't aware that "everybody" was on Gamespot. 

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="Nene33"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

Every day I see people saying that the "PS3 just came out. Give it time. The 360 took a year to get its first good game."

If this is the case, then the PS3 truly has nothing. The PS3's highest rated game is Resistance with an 8.6 score. The 360 launched with three exclusives that scored higher. Do you still even want to compare what the PS3 has now against what the 360 had seven months into its lifespan? Are you really willing to say that your own system has nothing in order to say that the system you oppose took a year to get something worthy?

This argument didn't work for the original Xbox ("The PS2 had a one year head start. That's why its game library is better. /cry) and it's not working now for the PS3. The PS2 had a better lineup in its first year than the Xbox did. The 360 had a better first seven months than the PS3 did.

Nene33

First off everyone knows GS structurally downgrades any title that isn't a 360 title, Resistance is the best FPS console shooter there is.

gamespot, you say? run over to gamerankings and tell me what score you see for resistance.

You might have noticed the score was WE 8.6, YOU 8.7 and THEY 8.8.

As you might also have noticed Kameo(1 of your higher rated examples) WE 8.7, YOU 8.6 THEY 8.1, WHICH MEANS EVERYBODY EXCEPT GS THINKS IT WAS BETTER THEN RESISTANCE.

You might have noticed the score was WE 8.6, YOU 8.7 and THEY 8.8.

As you might also have noticed Kameo(1 of your higher rated examples) WE 8.7, YOU 8.6 THEY 8.1, WHICH MEANS EVERYBODY EXCEPT GS THINKS RESISTANCE WAS BETTER.

Nene33

They 8.8 is an average. Which means roughly 50% scored the game above 8.8 and 50% scored i below. That puts gamespot pretty much slap bang in the middle 

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]            Wow still going lol - A bit off topic but, Casey; I figured since you created two controversial ( but factual ) threads that got both 360 & PS3 fans going, today I would see a similar approach on the subject of the Wii - lol ;)CaseyWegner

i'm not really sure what to do about the wii. it's the least bashed console and its fanbase is also the quietest. cause and effect, maybe.

[QUOTE="Nene33"]

You might have noticed the score was WE 8.6, YOU 8.7 and THEY 8.8.

As you might also have noticed Kameo(1 of your higher rated examples) WE 8.7, YOU 8.6 THEY 8.1, WHICH MEANS EVERYBODY EXCEPT GS THINKS RESISTANCE WAS BETTER.

cakeorrdeath

They 8.8 is an average. Which means roughly 50% scored the game above 8.8 and 50% scored i below. That puts gamespot pretty much slap bang in the middle

Cake you know better than to give a straight forward answer using logic.  Nene33's head may explode after reading your simply but true response. 

you guys are mean.CaseyWegner

It's only bad if you enjoy being mean...which I do. :P

THANK YOU for making this Topic Casey. It is just a lame propoganda attempt to imply there was nothing worth playing on the X360 before Gears came out. And even with that game we still get the "overrated" slander :roll:

And even if more than a few games are on PS3, doesn't change the fact they ARE available on this platform (in many cases before the PS3 debute in that 1st year) and great to play on Xbox 360.

This needs to be stickied :D

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]Damn Casey, you sure do seem to like putting Shungokustasu in his place...shungokustasu

Please, I'm in no competition with that guy. Don't make it seem like it. Actually his views on gaming are similar to mine. The only difference is I man enough to have loyalty to a company.

HAHAHA. That is hilarious. You are man enough to be a fanboy. LOL.

Every day I see people saying that the "PS3 just came out. Give it time. The 360 took a year to get its first good game."

If this is the case, then the PS3 truly has nothing. The PS3's highest rated game is Resistance with an 8.6 score. The 360 launched with three exclusives that scored higher. Do you still even want to compare what the PS3 has now against what the 360 had seven months into its lifespan? Are you really willing to say that your own system has nothing in order to say that the system you oppose took a year to get something worthy?

This argument didn't work for the original Xbox ("The PS2 had a one year head start. That's why its game library is better. /cry) and it's not working now for the PS3. The PS2 had a better lineup in its first year than the Xbox did. The 360 had a better first seven months than the PS3 did.

CaseyWegner

Come on Casey.  You should know better than to take the fanboy crap here personally.  We live in a world where people are way more concerned about appearing right than actually being right.  We live in a world where something becomes truth if it is only repeated enough because %90 of people are too lazy or apathetic to bother educating themselves.

It shouldn't be surprising that in such a materialistic and consumerist area such as gaming, many care less about fact, truth or even GAMES, and would rather argue as if their personaly image and pride is on the line.

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]you guys are mean.Verge_6

It's only bad if you enjoy being mean...which I do. :P

i was going to give him a chance at redemption.

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]you guys are mean.CaseyWegner

It's only bad if you enjoy being mean...which I do. :P

i was going to give him a chance at redemption.

Judging from that post...I don't think he wants that chance, really...or redemption at all. 

the 360 had some good games on its first day...

the ps3's current game line up is very dissapointing..there isnt anything.

the 360 had some good games on its first day...

the ps3's current game line up is very dissapointing..there isnt anything.

daveg1

8.6 isn't anything?

[QUOTE="daveg1"]

the 360 had some good games on its first day...

the ps3's current game line up is very dissapointing..there isnt anything.

CaseyWegner

8.6 isn't anything?

the  score of one review does'nt paint a gospel image of how a game is to me....it should only be used as a guide..

[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="Verge_6"]

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]you guys are mean.shungokustasu

It's only bad if you enjoy being mean...which I do. :P

i was going to give him a chance at redemption.

I don't think he wants that chance, really...or redemption at all. In his head, he is right, and we are wrong, and nothing will change that.

Stop acting as if you cool at owning people. You're a nobody. Casey makes one stupid post about the PS3 fanbase, and you lemming act all crazy. I thought Bill Gates were you guys leader, but now I know who it really is.

Oh, Shungo...I wasn't even talking about you. Also,tell my PS2, PS1, Dreamcast, Gamecube, etc. that I'm a 'lemming'. Also, no corporate boss is my 'leader', nor is some mod on a gaming forum. I'm above such childish beliefs that a company actually gives a damn about me, and this is only a gaming forum. You need to sit down and take deep breaths, it seems.

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="daveg1"]

the 360 had some good games on its first day...

the ps3's current game line up is very dissapointing..there isnt anything.

daveg1

8.6 isn't anything?

the score of one review does'nt paint a gospel image of how a game is to me....it should only be used as a guide..

And how many PS3 games have you played? 

That's right, get lost Verge_6 !!

You are NOT a man because you not loyal to a company.

[QUOTE="daveg1"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="daveg1"]

the 360 had some good games on its first day...

the ps3's current game line up is very dissapointing..there isnt anything.

shungokustasu

8.6 isn't anything?

the score of one review does'nt paint a gospel image of how a game is to me....it should only be used as a guide..

And how many PS3 games have you played? 

edit: thats becasue there are only two games out right now that are worth playin..ive played all of the other games on the 360..

[QUOTE="shungokustasu"]

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]Damn Casey, you sure do seem to like putting Shungokustasu in his place...John-J-Rambo

Please, I'm in no competition with that guy. Don't make it seem like it. Actually his views on gaming are similar to mine. The only difference is I man enough to have loyalty to a company.

HAHAHA. That is hilarious. You are man enough to be a fanboy. LOL.

You have loyalty to a company? Very strange. Do you believe this company is loyal to you? or maybe you're wallet? If you hurt you're leg tomorrow are they going to send a "get well soon card"? The great P.T. Barnum said "There is a sucker born every second", he may have been talking about you. Be loyal to friends, be loyal to family, be loyal to a faceless corporation that only cares about making money from you, Never. But another wise man also said "A fool and his money are bound to part ways".