It did not take one year for the 360 to get a "good" game

[QUOTE="Blinblingthing"]

Crackdown has a 8.4 Ave at GRankings. So i'd expect that from GS (7.9)

WHat am saying is that Instances where GS overscores a PS3 titles apparently don't happen

CaseyWegner

dude. come on. it's not overscored or underscored just because it doesn't exactly match the average. it would have to be very far from the average.

Ermmm, Don't GS reviews normally have a lower score than everyone else's reviews?

Hmmm, 360s Oblivion got the same treatment too.

9.6 here to a 9.4 there

You really expected GS to give PS3's Oblivion anything less than a 9.5 where its an improvement to Oblivion on 360????

It would sort a be saying no improvement were made to oblivion

Blinblingthing

I knew you would pretend you never said anything about that and change the subject.

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="Blinblingthing"]

Crackdown has a 8.4 Ave at GRankings. So i'd expect that from GS (7.9)

WHat am saying is that Instances where GS overscores a PS3 titles apparently don't happen

Blinblingthing

dude. come on. it's not overscored or underscored just because it doesn't exactly match the average. it would have to be very far from the average.

Ermmm, Don't GS reviews normally have a lower score than everyone else's reviews?

[QUOTE="Blinblingthing"]

Ummm, Its the average is whats important here.

And since when does GS give a game its Highest Score???

CaseyWegner

it would be if the scores were very far off...which they are not.

/shrug

Ok Casey. ANswer this.

Typically, Arn't Games usually scored there lowest at GS?????? (Am talking between major game review sites?)

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="Blinblingthing"]

Ummm, Its the average is whats important here.

And since when does GS give a game its Highest Score???

Blinblingthing

it would be if the scores were very far off...which they are not.

/shrug

Ok Casey. ANswer this.

Typically, Arn't Games usually scored there lowest at GS?????? (Am talking between major game review sites?)

no.

[QUOTE="Blinblingthing"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="Blinblingthing"]

Crackdown has a 8.4 Ave at GRankings. So i'd expect that from GS (7.9)

WHat am saying is that Instances where GS overscores a PS3 titles apparently don't happen

CaseyWegner

dude. come on. it's not overscored or underscored just because it doesn't exactly match the average. it would have to be very far from the average.

Ermmm, Don't GS reviews normally have a lower score than everyone else's reviews?

Excellent.

SO that means their normally higher

What happened to VF 5

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="Blinblingthing"]

Ummm, Its the average is whats important here.

And since when does GS give a game its Highest Score???

Blinblingthing

it would be if the scores were very far off...which they are not.

/shrug

Ok Casey. ANswer this.

Typically, Arn't Games usually scored there lowest at GS?????? (Am talking between major game review sites?)

I think GS is bias. You have to be very naive to think a human is not. I think it's "fair" bias though. They enjoy the 360 more. Why call them out on that? It's not like they trying to stop people on buying a PS3.

Excellent.

SO that means their normally higher

What happened to VF 5

Blinblingthing

He didn't say that.

Excellent.

SO that means their normally higher

What happened to VF 5

Blinblingthing

That's for sure! It's more that they reek of 360 fanboyishness. The things I've been suspended for saying on SW is totally rediculous. Why is it SW if you can't have an opinion about what someone has wrote?

casey7672

You moderated? No way..... :shock:

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="Blinblingthing"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="Blinblingthing"]

Crackdown has a 8.4 Ave at GRankings. So i'd expect that from GS (7.9)

WHat am saying is that Instances where GS overscores a PS3 titles apparently don't happen

Blinblingthing

dude. come on. it's not overscored or underscored just because it doesn't exactly match the average. it would have to be very far from the average.

Ermmm, Don't GS reviews normally have a lower score than everyone else's reviews?

Excellent.

SO that means their normally higher

What happened to VF 5

Excellent.

SO that means their normally higher

What happened to VF 5

Blinblingthing

Or it means that there isn't a trend. Some are higher, and some are lower. It isn't mostly one way or the other.

[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

Every day I see people saying that the "PS3 just came out. Give it time. The 360 took a year to get its first good game."

If this is the case, then the PS3 truly has nothing. The PS3's highest rated exclusive game is Resistance with an 8.6 score. The 360 launched with three exclusives (perfect dark zero, kameo, and pgr3) that scored higher. Do you still even want to compare what the PS3 has now against what the 360 had seven months into its lifespan? Are you really willing to say that your own system has nothing in order to say that the system you oppose took a year to get something worthy?

This argument didn't work for the original Xbox ("The PS2 had a one year head start. That's why its game library is better. /cry) and it's not working now for the PS3. The PS2 had a better lineup in its first year than the Xbox did. The 360 had a better first seven months than the PS3 did.

Socrates88

Wow. Been saying this the entire time and the only response was "ju ju just you wait!" The PS3 lineup is simply a joke. Anybody who cant admit is a pure fanboy at heart. :shock:

Again, my confuse zebra. If the PS3 is weak than the Xbox360 took a year to have a good game.

Yes. The 360 had more AA titles in its first 7 months than the 360. Next?

[QUOTE="Socrates88"][QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

Every day I see people saying that the "PS3 just came out. Give it time. The 360 took a year to get its first good game."

If this is the case, then the PS3 truly has nothing. The PS3's highest rated exclusive game is Resistance with an 8.6 score. The 360 launched with three exclusives (perfect dark zero, kameo, and pgr3) that scored higher. Do you still even want to compare what the PS3 has now against what the 360 had seven months into its lifespan? Are you really willing to say that your own system has nothing in order to say that the system you oppose took a year to get something worthy?

This argument didn't work for the original Xbox ("The PS2 had a one year head start. That's why its game library is better. /cry) and it's not working now for the PS3. The PS2 had a better lineup in its first year than the Xbox did. The 360 had a better first seven months than the PS3 did.

Magical_Zebra

Wow. Been saying this the entire time and the only response was "ju ju just you wait!" The PS3 lineup is simply a joke. Anybody who cant admit is a pure fanboy at heart. :shock:

Again, my confuse zebra. If the PS3 is weak than the Xbox360 took a year to have a good game.

Yes. The 360 had more AA titles in its first 7 months than the 360. Next?

i thought the 360 had the same amount of AA games as the 360.

[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"][QUOTE="Socrates88"]

Again, my confuse zebra. If the PS3 is weak than the Xbox360 took a year to have a good game.

CaseyWegner

Yes. The 360 had more AA titles in its first 7 months than the 360. Next?

i thought the 360 had the same amount of AA games as the 360.

I assume he meant PS3. A tilly sypo.

[QUOTE="cakeorrdeath"][QUOTE="Blinblingthing"]

True, But funny they so far haven't liked em as much as they did to some 360 Games

Blinblingthing

Why is that funny? IS it funny that they like them more than some 360 games?

Lets not try and change the subject.

Its obvious 360 games have been getting more love than PS3 games

Here's a weird idea, maybe they just have so far liked the 360 games better? Just cause you think PS3 games are better doesn't make it fact. Again if you guys think GS is so bias then why not leave the site?

i thought the 360 had the same amount of AA games as the 360.

CaseyWegner

ROFLMAO! Ooops! :shock:

[QUOTE="cakeorrdeath"][QUOTE="Blinblingthing"]

Its obvious 360 games have been getting more love than PS3 games

Blinblingthing

For some reason it seems only obvious to PS3 fans. Why is that?

Crackdown, Lost Planet, Shadowrun etc where was their love?

why would a 360 fan say his game was over rated??????

Where is there Love??? MAy be it went to PDZ, Kameo, Dead or Alive 4

I think PDZ was overated and sucks but that's my opinion. Others may like it and here at GS we go by GS scores andI respect that. It seems Cows only respect things that favor them

That is such a biased opinion it is not even funny. First of all, out of those 3 360 games you mentioned, PGR3 was the only one that got good scores by the makority of review sites/mags. Second of all, the PS3 has Resistance, VF5, MotorStorm just to start. and last but not least, the PS3 has a more promising future than the 360, it's Halo 3 Bioshock Mass Effect vs. Uncharted Lair LittleBigPlanet Rathet and Clank Folklore Gran Turismo + many many more. Now ask yourself which system is looking the best? PS3 that's the answer.snorlaxmaster

how is it biased? you're the one throwig their personal opinions into this. :|

[QUOTE="Blinblingthing"][QUOTE="cakeorrdeath"][QUOTE="Blinblingthing"]

True, But funny they so far haven't liked em as much as they did to some 360 Games

kcpp2b

Why is that funny? IS it funny that they like them more than some 360 games?

Lets not try and change the subject.

Its obvious 360 games have been getting more love than PS3 games

Here's a weird idea, maybe they just have so far liked the 360 games better? Just cause you think PS3 games are better doesn't make it fact. Again if you guys think GS is so bias then why not leave the site?

It's also hilarious that he says "let's try to not change the subject" when he's the first one to do it when he loses the argument !

:lol:

Every day I see people saying that the "PS3 just came out. Give it time. The 360 took a year to get its first good game."

If this is the case, then the PS3 truly has nothing. The PS3's highest rated exclusive game is Resistance with an 8.6 score. The 360 launched with three exclusives (perfect dark zero, kameo, and pgr3) that scored higher. Do you still even want to compare what the PS3 has now against what the 360 had seven months into its lifespan? Are you really willing to say that your own system has nothing in order to say that the system you oppose took a year to get something worthy?

This argument didn't work for the original Xbox ("The PS2 had a one year head start. That's why its game library is better. /cry) and it's not working now for the PS3. The PS2 had a better lineup in its first year than the Xbox did. The 360 had a better first seven months than the PS3 did.

CaseyWegner

That is such a biased opinion it is not even funny. First of all, out of those 3 360 games you mentioned, PGR3 was the only one that got good scores by the makority of review sites/mags. Second of all, the PS3 has Resistance, VF5, MotorStorm just to start. and last but not least, the PS3 has a more promising future than the 360, it's Halo 3 Bioshock Mass Effect vs. Uncharted Lair LittleBigPlanet Rathet and Clank Folklore Gran Turismo + many many more. Now ask yourself which system is looking the best? PS3 that's the answer.snorlaxmaster

How is it biased when he saying that PS3 has good game if the 360 has good games? Funny, you mention Motorstorm and VF5, yet you want to write off PGR3...

[QUOTE="John-J-Rambo"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"]

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]Damn Casey, you sure do seem to like putting Shungokustasu in his place...jbeen

Please, I'm in no competition with that guy. Don't make it seem like it. Actually his views on gaming are similar to mine. The only difference is I man enough to have loyalty to a company.

HAHAHA. That is hilarious. You are man enough to be a fanboy. LOL.

You have loyalty to a company? Very strange. Do you believe this company is loyal to you? or maybe you're wallet? If you hurt you're leg tomorrow are they going to send a "get well soon card"? The great P.T. Barnum said "There is a sucker born every second", he may have been talking about you. Be loyal to friends, be loyal to family, be loyal to a faceless corporation that only cares about making money from you, Never. But another wise man also said "A fool and his money are bound to part ways".

I hopes that wasn't aimed at me...

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

Every day I see people saying that the "PS3 just came out. Give it time. The 360 took a year to get its first good game."

If this is the case, then the PS3 truly has nothing. The PS3's highest rated exclusive game is Resistance with an 8.6 score. The 360 launched with three exclusives that scored higher. Do you still even want to compare what the PS3 has now against what the 360 had seven months into its lifespan? Are you really willing to say that your own system has nothing in order to say that the system you oppose took a year to get something worthy?

This argument didn't work for the original Xbox ("The PS2 had a one year head start. That's why its game library is better. /cry) and it's not working now for the PS3. The PS2 had a better lineup in its first year than the Xbox did. The 360 had a better first seven months than the PS3 did.

elementz28

ok what were the games the 360 have in its 6 month? maybe im missing it..pdz did not deserve the score it got here..lol..

PDZ is an awesome game suckah! Makes me think you have never even played it. I had much more fun with it that I did with R:FoM. I think R:FoM is possibly the most over rated game of all time, even more so than Halo.

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="Blinblingthing"]

[QUOTE="Sup11722"]wow i knew the cows were getting low but wow this is just sad your arguing with facts i feel so bad for my freind getting a ps3 tommrow now i hope your ok ryanBlinblingthing

May I ask what are these Facts your referring to?

the fact that gamespot's reviews are what we use as the standard in system wars.

I think its fact we've seen some questionable reviews here

I mean GS scoring Forza 2 beyond its game average on game rankings????

PDZ AAA here, lmao, Its bearely AA at game rankings...

Now sure reviewers make mistakes overscoring games, But it appears they never over score PS3 games

LOL. How do you make a mistake reviewing a game? It is just an opinion....

I think PDZ was overated and sucks but that's my opinion. Others may like it and here at GS we go by GS scores andI respect that. It seems Cows only respect things that favor them

kcpp2b

It'll be fun to watch cows' long-lost faith in Gamespot reviews suddenly restored with their first exclusive AAA.

LOL. How do you make a mistake reviewing a game? It is just an opinion....

John-J-Rambo

Casey its just a matter of Opininon not really much. there are too manny fanboys trolls here.

as in for the wii is ony has mim games :o

of course i do agree it didnt take a year. but it takes time to make a well game.

[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

Every day I see people saying that the "PS3 just came out. Give it time. The 360 took a year to get its first good game."

If this is the case, then the PS3 truly has nothing. The PS3's highest rated exclusive game is Resistance with an 8.6 score. The 360 launched with three exclusives (perfect dark zero, kameo, and pgr3) that scored higher. Do you still even want to compare what the PS3 has now against what the 360 had seven months into its lifespan? Are you really willing to say that your own system has nothing in order to say that the system you oppose took a year to get something worthy?

This argument didn't work for the original Xbox ("The PS2 had a one year head start. That's why its game library is better. /cry) and it's not working now for the PS3. The PS2 had a better lineup in its first year than the Xbox did. The 360 had a better first seven months than the PS3 did.

Socrates88

Wow. Been saying this the entire time and the only response was "ju ju just you wait!" The PS3 lineup is simply a joke. Anybody who cant admit is a pure fanboy at heart. :shock:

Again, my confuse zebra. If the PS3 is weak than the Xbox360 took a year to have a good game.

What!? The PS3 does have good games, just not very many. Especially exclusives. It has an extremely weak line up.

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="Blinblingthing"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="Blinblingthing"]

Crackdown has a 8.4 Ave at GRankings. So i'd expect that from GS (7.9)

WHat am saying is that Instances where GS overscores a PS3 titles apparently don't happen

Blinblingthing

dude. come on. it's not overscored or underscored just because it doesn't exactly match the average. it would have to be very far from the average.

Ermmm, Don't GS reviews normally have a lower score than everyone else's reviews?

Excellent.

SO that means their normally higher

What happened to VF 5

I love how you make it black and white. LOL. They normally score right around the acerage.

That is such a biased opinion it is not even funny. First of all, out of those 3 360 games you mentioned, PGR3 was the only one that got good scores by the makority of review sites/mags. Second of all, the PS3 has Resistance, VF5, MotorStorm just to start. and last but not least, the PS3 has a more promising future than the 360, it's Halo 3 Bioshock Mass Effect vs. Uncharted Lair LittleBigPlanet Rathet and Clank Folklore Gran Turismo + many many more. Now ask yourself which system is looking the best? PS3 that's the answer.snorlaxmaster

First of all PGR3, PD, and Kameo all scored around the average. Secdond of all, I love how you list a bunch of games for the PS3, and like the 360 is only getting 3. LOL. The 360 is going to get a whole lot of games too, and out of all the PS3 games you listed, the only one that lookis like it even has a chance of getting AAA status is uncharted, and that is a long shot. It is cool that you think the PS3 has a better future line up, but not everyone else thinks so.

[QUOTE="John-J-Rambo"]

LOL. How do you make a mistake reviewing a game? It is just an opinion....

Hewkii

What? A review is just one person opinion.