Knight's Guide to understanding WHY Pc is superior

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for knight0151
knight0151

1205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 knight0151
Member since 2008 • 1205 Posts

Alright gentlemen, we have an influx of console guys in here spreading a lot of bull about PC gamers and myths, and the whole mess of "CONSOLE GAMING IS TEH SUPERIOR" threads. So I decided to post my own, and I have a LOT of time on my hands today. Time to debunk them and answer any questions that people have.

Now, before I start typing, these facts may seem obvious to some people, but surprisingly, some people don't know it yet.

Why is PC gaming better, you might ask. well, I can prove it to you right now, as long as you actually read my post. Let's get started. Now, I know that people MAY PREFER CONSOLE GAMING OVER PC, that's fine, but PC gaming is SUPERIOR to console gaming, proven fact. Why is it a proven fact? Well, scroll down and read!

Let's start with the hardware. PC's have superior hardware, and no, the Ps3 cell processor does not dwarf the pc hardware. Which means that developers can PUSH the technological limits of the PC as the hardware is ALWAYS improving so developers have VERY LITTLE restriction, this allows open world gameplay without annoying loading screens as PC's have more RAM than the 512 MB that consoles have. We enjoy 1920x1200 resolution and EVEN HIGHER, yes, that's right console guys, EVEN HIGHER that that. Especially with ATI Eyefinity, and if you got the money, then go for that, 3 screens with triplehead2go.

FACT:, PC hardware is better, and developers have more room to create gaming master pieces on PC because of that.

Now, time to debunk arguments

"BUT U HAZ TO PAY 9000 DOLLARS A MONTH TO UPGRADE IT"

No, my console troll friend, you don't have to, those with money certainly can, but they're not really spending their money wisely."

FACT: Pc gaming DOES NOT cost thousands of dollars, budget machines CAN be built for about 400-500 dollars. And when you think about it, when you buy a console, that's 200-300 bucks, not counting the XBL Live membership, or the extra peripherals that you have to buy with it. Such as an extremely overpriced hard drive *looks at microsoft*

FACT: You save MONEY in the long run because of the PC, steam says hello. I will lay down some examples.

Bfbc2 for consoles: 60 dollars.

For PC: 46.99, and look guys, IT WAS ON SALE ON EA a while back ago for around 20 bucks. Amazing. Yes, we Pc gamers save money.

THQ Metro 2033 was on sale for 12.50, how much was it for you console folks, 60 dollars?

KNIGHT LOL'S.

Steam sales are amazing, I don't even need to say anything. You guys just download steam and see.

"BUT KNIGHT, PC GAMING IS DYING NO GOOD PC SALES" Wrong.

48 percent, that's right, 48, are on digital distribution services, such as steam an Direct2Drive.

Fact: Digital Distribution has been growing at a very fast pace.

"But knight, PC GAMERS HAZ NO AAAA"

Fact: PC GAMES ARE RATED AT A HIGHER STANDARD THAN CONSOLE GAMES. Any questions will be answered on request.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#2 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Fact: No 500-600 dollar PC will last more than 6 months.

I'm sorry but anybody who says that buying a PC is cheap ALWAYS forgets that 90% of people who don't own a good PC need a mouse, keyboard, monitor, and probably speakers or headphones and an operating system. All that alone adds up to about $300 extra to any price. Also a 600 PC will beable to play all of the games, but very few of the new ones on high settings and NO new games on high or even medium settings.

You want a PC that is going to last, that isn't going to break from cheap parts, that is going to not require an upgrade for 2-3 years? Drop at least 1 grand on the PC alone, not including software and extra hardware you will need (mouse, keyboard, monitor, speakers).

PC gaming can be superior because of the hardware and open platform but developers need to take advantage of it. If you just port a console game over to the PC, it just isn't right. Everything from the optimization of the engine to the UI will be wrong.

Good PC gaming requires money. There is no escaping it. If PC gaming were cheap, the consoles wouldn't be necessary. Consoles are there to provide another way to play games at a much lower cost than it costs to build and maintain a PC.

I love PC gaming, I just built a brand new computer, I bought 50 games on the Steam sale for dirt cheap, I love the open platform, I love how robust the features is, but I know for a fact that nothing about PC gaming is cheap. If you want quality, you have to pay for it.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts

i shall volunteer my old gaming rig to prove your point about cost. This computer cost $450, but not recently, in 2008. That was when the ps3 was still $500-600. So my computer was LESS than a ps3

This is what it was able to do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILa4jDsPUd4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=811cft3Vg2E

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKMZ0IN3Ko0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSe0Ecl1fm8

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#4 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

i shall volunteer my old gaming rig to prove your point about cost. This computer cost $450, but not recently, in 2008. That was when the ps3 was still $500-600. So my computer was LESS than a ps3

This is what it was able to do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILa4jDsPUd4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=811cft3Vg2E

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKMZ0IN3Ko0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSe0Ecl1fm8

ferret-gamer

Unless you have a 720p monitor, why would you play PC games in anything less than the native resolution of your monitor?

Not only were those games not at a very high resolution, the framerates weren't that good. I guess you could blame that on fraps, but still I think you're really missing the point with PC gaming.

PC gaming is all about ultra high resolutions and settings, it isn't about skimping by. That is what the consoles were made for, people who didn't want to have to skimp by with a crap PC that bearly runs the games.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

i shall volunteer my old gaming rig to prove your point about cost. This computer cost $450, but not recently, in 2008. That was when the ps3 was still $500-600. So my computer was LESS than a ps3

This is what it was able to do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILa4jDsPUd4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=811cft3Vg2E

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKMZ0IN3Ko0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSe0Ecl1fm8

Wasdie

Unless you have a 720p monitor, why would you play PC games in anything less than the native resolution of your monitor?

i had a crt back then res of 1280x1024. I recorded in 1280x720 in windowed mode because youtube runs in widescreen if i had done it in the normal 4:3 orientation the vids would end up looking like they are in a box.

I have a 20 inch Acer LCD now, no more decade old crt.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62038 Posts

Superiority comes at a price. Yes it's been proven you can build a cheap computer, but the longevity won't be there (especially for gaming at higher resolutions and settings). Not a bad thing for budget gamers, as they likely won't be looking at gaming all V. High, 1920x1200 plus etc, due to them looking within such a limited budget.

Still, the fact that hardware performance has rocketed and we still have a game from 2007 that owns the majority of PC games in terms of looks, shows that software has slowed very much so.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#7 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

i shall volunteer my old gaming rig to prove your point about cost. This computer cost $450, but not recently, in 2008. That was when the ps3 was still $500-600. So my computer was LESS than a ps3

This is what it was able to do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILa4jDsPUd4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=811cft3Vg2E

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKMZ0IN3Ko0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSe0Ecl1fm8

ferret-gamer

Unless you have a 720p monitor, why would you play PC games in anything less than the native resolution of your monitor?

i had a crt back then.

Today you'll be hard pressed to find a gamer running in anything less than 1440x900, and even that is considered low for PC gmaing.

Avatar image for cloudff7tm
cloudff7tm

3975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 cloudff7tm
Member since 2006 • 3975 Posts

Yeah, all that stuff is cool. But when it comes down to games, a lot of games are multiplat between consoles and PC. You don't get the same experience of course, but they are still good on consoles. As far as PC exclusive games go, nothing makes me desperately want a PC.

There are things I want of course (Some strategy games, Steam), but nothing I can't live without. Someone can say the exact opposite though so to each their own.

Avatar image for dgwutka
dgwutka

15331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 dgwutka
Member since 2004 • 15331 Posts

Fact: No 500-600 dollar PC will last more than 6 months.

Wasdie

My $500 PC is 3 years old and will still max almost anything.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#10 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Fact: No 500-600 dollar PC will last more than 6 months.

dgwutka

My $500 PC is 3 years old and will still max almost anything.

Define "max" and what games?

I can say my old $300, 10 year old PC can max almost anything too.

That doesn't make it true.

My $1200 PC built in 2007 with a 8800 gts 640mb struggled to keep decent framerates with any modern game. I don't know how your $500 PC from the same time could do any better.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Unless you have a 720p monitor, why would you play PC games in anything less than the native resolution of your monitor?

Wasdie

i had a crt back then.

Today you'll be hard pressed to find a gamer running in anything less than 1440x900, and even that is considered low for PC gmaing.

yes, however those vids do prove a point that a cheap PC can still out perform a console. since that was the res that consoles run at or higher. However you are right about fraps, i have a lower end c2d with a smaller 2mb l2 cache so recording videos is absolutely brutal on my frame rate. It still struggles on recording even with a gtx 280 now.

Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts

Fact: No 500-600 dollar PC will last more than 6 months.

I'm sorry but anybody who says that buying a PC is cheap ALWAYS forgets that 90% of people who don't own a good PC need a mouse, keyboard, monitor, and probably speakers or headphones and an operating system. All that alone adds up to about $300 extra to any price. Also a 600 PC will beable to play all of the games, but very few of the new ones on high settings and NO new games on high or even medium settings.

You want a PC that is going to last, that isn't going to break from cheap parts, that is going to not require an upgrade for 2-3 years? Drop at least 1 grand on the PC alone, not including software and extra hardware you will need (mouse, keyboard, monitor, speakers).

PC gaming can be superior because of the hardware and open platform but developers need to take advantage of it. If you just port a console game over to the PC, it just isn't right. Everything from the optimization of the engine to the UI will be wrong.

Good PC gaming requires money. There is no escaping it. If PC gaming were cheap, the consoles wouldn't be necessary. Consoles are there to provide another way to play games at a much lower cost than it costs to build and maintain a PC.

I love PC gaming, I just built a brand new computer, I bought 50 games on the Steam sale for dirt cheap, I love the open platform, I love how robust the features is, but I know for a fact that nothing about PC gaming is cheap. If you want quality, you have to pay for it.

Wasdie
http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26986920&tag=topics;title would most likely play any game today on high and its a year old.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#13 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

I have come to learn that PC gaming has a lot of flexibility, power, variety. I've just started with steam and it's a great platform for connectivity and sales. It's true that PCs can do a lot of things better than consoles, but there are still console exclusives, and I prefer them, so that is the greatest reason why I'll stick with consoles as my main gaming device.

Avatar image for stvee101
stvee101

2953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 stvee101
Member since 2006 • 2953 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Fact: No 500-600 dollar PC will last more than 6 months.

dgwutka

My $500 PC is 3 years old and will still max almost anything.

I doubt it.

Plus your defintition of max settings may be different from someone elses.

Avatar image for dgwutka
dgwutka

15331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 dgwutka
Member since 2004 • 15331 Posts

Max = "Run at maximum graphical capability at a decent frame rate" Decent frame rate = 20+ FPS

Crysis, Assassin's Creed 2, Dragon Age, I'm already tired of listing. Almost any game I put on it.

EDIT: At 1680x1050.

EDIT again: It's just now getting outclassed. If I bought a brand new game that came out yesterday, it probably couldn't max it. But 3 years is still longer than 6 months.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#16 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26986920&tag=topics;title would most likely play any game today on high and its a year old. Silenthps

ArmA 2, Metro 2033, and Just Cause 2 on high would slaughter that PC.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#17 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Max = "Run at maximum graphical capability at a decent frame rate" Decent frame rate = 20+ FPS

Crysis, Assassin's Creed 2, Dragon Age, I'm already tired of listing. Almost any game I put on it.

EDIT: At 1680x1050.

dgwutka

What's the specs of said $500 2007 rig?

Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

i shall volunteer my old gaming rig to prove your point about cost. This computer cost $450, but not recently, in 2008. That was when the ps3 was still $500-600. So my computer was LESS than a ps3

This is what it was able to do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILa4jDsPUd4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=811cft3Vg2E

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKMZ0IN3Ko0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSe0Ecl1fm8

Wasdie

Unless you have a 720p monitor, why would you play PC games in anything less than the native resolution of your monitor?

Not only were those games not at a very high resolution, the framerates weren't that good. I guess you could blame that on fraps, but still I think you're really missing the point with PC gaming.

PC gaming is all about ultra high resolutions and settings, it isn't about skimping by. That is what the consoles were made for, people who didn't want to have to skimp by with a crap PC that bearly runs the games.

um... says who? PC gaming is about whatever the PC gamer wants it to be. The whole point is to customize your gaming experience however you like, even if you want it to be like a console experience.

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#19 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

I love both PC gaming and console gaming.

PC gaming for games like ARMA2, Total War series, Crysis, mods, the real TF2, best versions of Bioware games, Dawn of Discovery, The Witcher, Steam sales, bettert graphics and you can use any controller.

Console gaming for exclusives like Metal Gear, Uncharted2, Forza3, Lsot Odyssey,etc.. And the fact taht I can play it with my cousins and frineds taht dont have a decent pc to play pc games.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#20 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"] i had a crt back then. ferret-gamer

Today you'll be hard pressed to find a gamer running in anything less than 1440x900, and even that is considered low for PC gmaing.

yes, however those vids do prove a point that a cheap PC can still out perform a console. since that was the res that consoles run at or higher. However you are right about fraps, i have a lower end c2d with a smaller 2mb l2 cache so recording videos is absolutely brutal on my frame rate. It still struggles on recording even with a gtx 280 now.

Again sure it can outpreform consoles, but can it keep up to PC standards? I'm not comparing anything here to consoles, infact I don't care about them. A cheap PC today would not survive long against the newer games coming. You would have to upgrade.

I just can't imagine building a new PC and not being able to play all of the games on the highest settings. What is even the point then?

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#21 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts

[QUOTE="Silenthps"] would most likely play any game today on high and its a year old. Wasdie

ArmA 2, Metro 2033, and Just Cause 2 on high would slaughter that PC.

Arma2 and metro yes. Just cause 2, no. a my old system with a 3870 was able to run it on a mix of med/high with 4xAA just fine around 40fps.

Avatar image for stvee101
stvee101

2953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 stvee101
Member since 2006 • 2953 Posts

[QUOTE="dgwutka"]

Max = "Run at maximum graphical capability at a decent frame rate" Decent frame rate = 20+ FPS

Crysis, Assassin's Creed 2, Dragon Age, I'm already tired of listing. Almost any game I put on it.

EDIT: At 1680x1050.

Wasdie

What's the specs of said $500 2007 rig?

Thats what I want to know.

And if he's factoring in case,OS,mouse keyboard etc.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#23 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

um... says who? PC gaming is about whatever the PC gamer wants it to be. The whole point is to customize your gaming experience however you like, even if you want it to be like a console experience.

Silenthps

So you would really spend $200 more than a console to get the same experiance a console gets?

It makes no sense to me. If you're going to build a PC, build a PC. Don't build a 360.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Today you'll be hard pressed to find a gamer running in anything less than 1440x900, and even that is considered low for PC gmaing.

Wasdie

yes, however those vids do prove a point that a cheap PC can still out perform a console. since that was the res that consoles run at or higher. However you are right about fraps, i have a lower end c2d with a smaller 2mb l2 cache so recording videos is absolutely brutal on my frame rate. It still struggles on recording even with a gtx 280 now.

Again sure it can outpreform consoles, but can it keep up to PC standards? I'm not comparing anything here to consoles, infact I don't care about them. A cheap PC today would not survive long against the newer games coming. You would have to upgrade.

I just can't imagine building a new PC and not being able to play all of the games on the highest settings. What is even the point then?

I am a budget gamer, i am not able to afford all of the massive upgrades all the time, i upgrade when need be/when i have cash. As mentioned before PC gaming is what you want it to be. I choose PC gaming for the freedom of the platform to customize my games how i want, to create maps and other content, and all the while still having a great visual fidelity. And my $450 pc with one free gtx 280 upgrade can run metro 2033 highest setitngs 1600x900 no physx just fine thank you very much
Avatar image for LordQuorthon
LordQuorthon

5803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 LordQuorthon
Member since 2008 • 5803 Posts

I'm sorry but anybody who says that buying a PC is cheap ALWAYS forgets that 90% of people who don't own a good PC need a mouse, keyboard, monitor, and probably speakers or headphones and an operating system.

Wasdie

Wait... What? If they don't have all that stuff, they are NOT POSTING HERE. Hell, if you don't own a simple PC with a mouse, keyboard, monitor, speakers and headphones, not only are you not here, but chances are you can't afford a console either.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#26 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

I'm sorry but anybody who says that buying a PC is cheap ALWAYS forgets that 90% of people who don't own a good PC need a mouse, keyboard, monitor, and probably speakers or headphones and an operating system.

LordQuorthon

Wait... What? If they don't have all that stuff, they are NOT POSTING HERE. Hell, if you don't own a simple PC with a mouse, keyboard, monitor, speakers and headphones, not only are you not here, but chances are you can't afford a console either.

Laptops?

Also did you ever think that playing with an old 2003 CRT monitor is really the same as playing with a decent LCD monitor?

Also did you stop to think that a lot of console gamers are stuck using a family PC? So they couldn't just build their own and strip all of the accessories from their families PC?

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#27 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

I love PC gaming, I just built a brand new computer,I bought 50 games on the Steam sale for dirt cheap, I love the open platform, I love how robust the features is, but I know for a fact that nothing about PC gaming is cheap. If you want quality, you have to pay for it.

Wasdie

Hmmm....

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

Today you'll be hard pressed to find a gamer running in anything less than 1440x900, and even that is considered low for PC gmaing.

Wasdie
Can't be that hard... Steam Hardware Survey indicates that about 29.89 percent are running below 1440x900 (for some reason, probably horizontal resolution, it lists 1280x1024 as below 1440x900; I've removed that resolution's percentage accordingly).
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#29 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

I love PC gaming, I just built a brand new computer,I bought 50 games on the Steam sale for dirt cheap, I love the open platform, I love how robust the features is, but I know for a fact that nothing about PC gaming is cheap. If you want quality, you have to pay for it.

heretrix

Hmmm....

Games are cheap. I guess I did contradict myself there. The initial investment into PC gaming is not cheap at all, especially if you have no parts and are a normal consumer without crazy deals from people.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#30 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Today you'll be hard pressed to find a gamer running in anything less than 1440x900, and even that is considered low for PC gmaing.

lowe0

Can't be that hard... Steam Hardware Survey indicates that about 29.89 percent are running below 1440x900 (for some reason, probably horizontal resolution, it lists 1280x1024 as below 1440x900; I've removed that resolution's percentage accordingly).

Though you're right, you have to remember that Steam is also used by gamers who only play older games on older PCs.

Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts

ArmA 2, Metro 2033, and Just Cause 2 on high would slaughter that PC.

Wasdie

take Just Cause 2 off that list and bam you have 2 games in the whole PC catalog that it wouldn't run. Now lets look at games that PC gamers actually play according to steam's player count.

http://store.steampowered.com/stats/ yeah seems to me like the majority of PC gamers don't care.

Avatar image for dgwutka
dgwutka

15331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 dgwutka
Member since 2004 • 15331 Posts

The basics, off the top of my head.
AMD X2 4600+
2GB Corsair XMS2 DDR2
GPU was originally a 8600 GTX but I dropped in a GTX 260 a while back, so I guess the system is 2 years old, not 3. I don't know the exact cost but I figure it to be around $500, and I don't include keyboard, mouse, monitors, etc in that figure because I already had them when I bought it.

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Today you'll be hard pressed to find a gamer running in anything less than 1440x900, and even that is considered low for PC gmaing.

Can't be that hard... Steam Hardware Survey indicates that about 29.89 percent are running below 1440x900 (for some reason, probably horizontal resolution, it lists 1280x1024 as below 1440x900; I've removed that resolution's percentage accordingly).

Though you're right, you have to remember that Steam is also used by gamers who only play older games on older PCs.

Fair enough; there's really no clean line to draw between legacy and current PC hardware.
Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#34 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

I can see both sides of the argument to be honest.

Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]

um... says who? PC gaming is about whatever the PC gamer wants it to be. The whole point is to customize your gaming experience however you like, even if you want it to be like a console experience.

Wasdie

So you would really spend $200 more than a console to get the same experiance a console gets?

It makes no sense to me. If you're going to build a PC, build a PC. Don't build a 360.

No, but I like the freedom to be able to. Graphics is only 1 part of what makes PC gaming great. I'd rather play TF2 or Counterstrike or play a HL2 mod over ArmA anyday
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#36 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

The basics, off the top of my head.
AMD X2 4600+
2GB Corsair XMS2 DDR2
GPU was originally a 8600 GTX but I dropped in a GTX 260 a while back, so I guess the system is 2 years old, not 3. I don't know the exact cost but I figure it to be around $500, and I don't include keyboard, mouse, monitors, etc in that figure because I already had them when I bought it.

dgwutka

That's the problem. You can't assume a new PC gamer has that. I know the majority of people who are getting into PC gaming does not have any of that. Usually they are working off of a shared PC or they have a laptop.

Sure I can find you $500 of parts today that can probably play most of the games on max, but a normal person without the other parts of the PC or an operating system needs to factor that into the cost.

What I'm sayig is that PC gaming isn't nearly as cheap as the people of this forum would want you to believe. PC gaming is superior in every way but price, and I think the price is completely reasonable seeing you get way more out of a PC than you can get out of any two consoles.

Avatar image for LordQuorthon
LordQuorthon

5803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 LordQuorthon
Member since 2008 • 5803 Posts

Laptops?Wasdie

Those are more expensive than a console or a desktop PC.

Also did you ever think that playing with an old 2003 CRT monitor is really the same as playing with a decent LCD monitor?Wasdie

Does that mean one can joyfully add the cost of an HDTV to the cost of console gaming? You do understand that a fair share of consoles are still hooked up to CTR TVs, right?

Also did you stop to think that a lot of console gamers are stuck using a family PC? So they couldn't just build their own and strip all of the accessories from their families PC?

Wasdie

What kind of family computer is it? Is it a Pentium III or something? Because, right now, a lot of families have probably already upgraded to Core Duo PCs. A person can simply add some mid range Nvidia/Ati card to the machine and he'll be good to go.

Then again, I can see that, if pushed hard enough, you're one of those guys who like to come up with "IF YOU'RE STUCK ON A DESERT WITH ELECTRICITY AND BROADBAND INTERNET..." scenarios. So, I should probably stop arguing right now.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#38 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

I love PC gaming, I just built a brand new computer,I bought 50 games on the Steam sale for dirt cheap, I love the open platform, I love how robust the features is, but I know for a fact that nothing about PC gaming is cheap. If you want quality, you have to pay for it.

Wasdie

Hmmm....

Games are cheap. I guess I did contradict myself there. The initial investment into PC gaming is not cheap at all, especially if you have no parts and are a normal consumer without crazy deals from people.

Haha. I know exactly what you meant, but I thought it was funny when I read it. :P

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#39 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]Also did you stop to think that a lot of console gamers are stuck using a family PC? So they couldn't just build their own and strip all of the accessories from their families PC?

LordQuorthon

What kind of family computer is it? Is it a Pentium III or something? Because, right now, a lot of families have probably already upgraded to Core Duo PCs. A person can simply add some mid range Nvidia/Ati card to the machine and he'll be good to go.

Then again, I can see that, if pushed hard enough, you're one of those guys who like to come up with "IF YOU'RE STUCK ON A DESERT WITH ELECTRICITY AND BROADBAND INTERNET..." scenarios. So, I should probably stop arguing right now.

Have you ever tried to do some serious gaming without your own PC? Seriously... it's not fun.

Also laptops, a lot of people get them as a present for college or as a hand-me-down. I'm just saying what I have seen in real life. I've helped many people back on my college campus get into PC gaming and it's never a quick and easy fix. It's always expensive and there are always unforseen expenses.

In a perfect world everything would be so cheap, but gaming is a luxury, nothing comes without it's price.

Avatar image for NVIDIATI
NVIDIATI

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 NVIDIATI
Member since 2010 • 8463 Posts

This is a pretty good build for $600 and will last you for a while.

$593.93

  • Windows 7
  • Case
  • 585watt PSU
  • AM2+ mobo
  • 2 GB DDR2 800
  • AMD 2.5ghz Quad Core Black Edition
  • ATI 5770 1GB DDR5
  • Keyboard + Mouse
  • 250GB HDD 7200RPM
  • Wireless card
  • DVD RW

http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/2009/pc2.png

*NOTE* I'm sure you can even make a better one for the money, because that build was based off prices and hardware from April 2010. I'm not in the mood to go and build a rig again, but I'm sure you can do it with a GTX 460 now instead of that 5770 for around the same price.

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts
[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"]

This is a pretty good build for $600 and will last you for a while.

$593.93

  • Windows 7
  • Case
  • 585watt PSU
  • AM2+ mobo
  • 2 GB DDR2 800
  • AMD 2.5ghz Quad Core Black Edition
  • ATI 5770 1GB DDR5
  • Keyboard + Mouse
  • 250GB HDD 7200RPM
  • Wireless card
  • DVD RW

http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/2009/pc2.png

*NOTE* I'm sure you can even make a better one for the money, because that build was based off prices and hardware from April 2010. I'm not in the mood to go and build a rig again, but I'm sure you can do it with a GTX 460 now instead of that 5770 for around the same price.

My only disagreement with that would be the power supply. Once you've actually seen flames shoot out the back of a PSU, you never buy a cheap one again. Trust me on that.
Avatar image for NVIDIATI
NVIDIATI

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 NVIDIATI
Member since 2010 • 8463 Posts
[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="NVIDIATI"]

This is a pretty good build for $600 and will last you for a while.

$593.93

  • Windows 7
  • Case
  • 585watt PSU
  • AM2+ mobo
  • 2 GB DDR2 800
  • AMD 2.5ghz Quad Core Black Edition
  • ATI 5770 1GB DDR5
  • Keyboard + Mouse
  • 250GB HDD 7200RPM
  • Wireless card
  • DVD RW

http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/2009/pc2.png

*NOTE* I'm sure you can even make a better one for the money, because that build was based off prices and hardware from April 2010. I'm not in the mood to go and build a rig again, but I'm sure you can do it with a GTX 460 now instead of that 5770 for around the same price.

My only disagreement with that would be the power supply. Once you've actually seen flames shoot out the back of a PSU, you never buy a cheap one again. Trust me on that.

:lol: w/e that was a quick thing for a thread in April, I'm sure you can just as easily get a decent PSU for a fair price. Also cheap and low quality are 2 different things. My PSU was cheap but still pretty good as it has lasted me around 4 years now powering things like my 8800GT and now my 5870. Also I like to OC a lot :P.
Avatar image for blues35301
blues35301

2680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 blues35301
Member since 2008 • 2680 Posts
Everything wasdie has said is spot on. Pc gamers shouldn't look at absolute low cost budget rigs as a cost justification. It costs money simple as that but it's worth it and the experience is far superior. I spent 650 on my pc in 2008 and have since spent another 1000 in upgrades of vid card CPU psu mobo ram monitor and os. Not all at once but since then. I should be set for a while though. Maybe a new gpu for crysis 2
Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

If you want to get in to pc gaming I would recommend bulding a pc right the 1st time. And not go with a budget build. The reason I say this the budget pc will most likely require upgrading more often. Plus with quality parts there is less change of it going bad on you. Plus most high end parts come with life time warranties.

Avatar image for thespywholied
thespywholied

3358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 thespywholied
Member since 2008 • 3358 Posts

Aww, I wanted my thread to have a lot of console gamers to come in and cry, but it's Pc guys arguing about specs haha. carry on.

knight0151

PC fans vs PC fans lol

Avatar image for Zerkrender
Zerkrender

633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Zerkrender
Member since 2007 • 633 Posts
PC gaming is all about ultra high resolutions and settings, it isn't about skimping by. That is what the consoles were made for, people who didn't want to have to skimp by with a crap PC that bearly runs the games.Wasdie
THIS! I like all the high tech stuff and console ports with upgrades and extra features. When I build my PC the tower is going have no less than a $2000 budget, I want the latest and greatest when I start.
Avatar image for NVIDIATI
NVIDIATI

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 NVIDIATI
Member since 2010 • 8463 Posts

Alright I took a couple of minutes and put this together...

$604.89

  • Nvidia GTX 460
  • 160GB HDD 7200rpm
  • Windows 7
  • DVD Drive
  • KB/M + speakers
  • 2GB DDR2 800 Ram
  • Case
  • AMD Phenom 2.5Ghz quad core black edition
  • AM2+ MOBO
  • 680watt PSU
  • FREE: Just Cause 2

http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/5535/600pc.jpg

Avatar image for NVIDIATI
NVIDIATI

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 NVIDIATI
Member since 2010 • 8463 Posts

Aww, I wanted my thread to have a lot of console gamers to come in and cry, but it's Pc guys arguing about specs haha. carry on.

knight0151

lol... we're sorry... :P