Microsoft Timed Ban Spree to Maximise Profits

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mythrol
mythrol

5237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#201 mythrol
Member since 2005 • 5237 Posts

This makes zero sense. How does banning people, who can then no longer buy and play games, maximize MS's profits?How is it MS's fault that some people broke their terms of use and therefore are now whining and crying about it? Is it MS's fault that these people were, at the best, completely ignorant, and at the worst, completely negligent and tried to rip off the company who made the console they supposedly love so much?

Seriously, what am I missing here?

ZIMdoom
First. They CAN still Buy AND Play games. Microsoft did NOT brick the system. Just stopped them from connecting to XBL, and being able to store games to the HDD (both smart moves). Second. If you have a modded system, specifically with the purpose of playing pirated games. . .how many games were you actually BUYING?
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#202 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="ZIMdoom"]

This makes zero sense. How does banning people, who can then no longer buy and play games, maximize MS's profits?How is it MS's fault that some people broke their terms of use and therefore are now whining and crying about it? Is it MS's fault that these people were, at the best, completely ignorant, and at the worst, completely negligent and tried to rip off the company who made the console they supposedly love so much?

Seriously, what am I missing here?

mythrol
First. They CAN still Buy AND Play games. Microsoft did NOT brick the system. Just stopped them from connecting to XBL, and being able to store games to the HDD (both smart moves). Second. If you have a modded system, specifically with the purpose of playing pirated games. . .how many games were you actually BUYING?

I can see the online cheating thing, but why the hard drive? If they're so afraid of game hacking, why not encrypt the contents to tamper-harden them? Doing that, they could also allow the use of external USB Mass Storage devices for all gaming tasks, which would make a tempting selling point.
Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#203 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17902 Posts
[QUOTE="mythrol"][QUOTE="ZIMdoom"]

This makes zero sense. How does banning people, who can then no longer buy and play games, maximize MS's profits?How is it MS's fault that some people broke their terms of use and therefore are now whining and crying about it? Is it MS's fault that these people were, at the best, completely ignorant, and at the worst, completely negligent and tried to rip off the company who made the console they supposedly love so much?

Seriously, what am I missing here?

HuusAsking
First. They CAN still Buy AND Play games. Microsoft did NOT brick the system. Just stopped them from connecting to XBL, and being able to store games to the HDD (both smart moves). Second. If you have a modded system, specifically with the purpose of playing pirated games. . .how many games were you actually BUYING?

I can see the online cheating thing, but why the hard drive? If they're so afraid of game hacking, why not encrypt the contents to tamper-harden them? Doing that, they could also allow the use of external USB Mass Storage devices for all gaming tasks, which would make a tempting selling point.

Because even if you encrypt them, hackers will still find a way if they have free access to the HDD like they would with 3rd party hard drives. I know its not easy to break, but opening the door just a little bit allows at least some hackers/pirates in. MS learned that the hard way last gen by using a standard PC hard drive, and the console was hacked to death, allowing people to upgrade, and even install retail games. So they closed the door this gen. I dont agree with it, but i fully understand it.
Avatar image for deactivated-5dd711115e664
deactivated-5dd711115e664

8956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#204 deactivated-5dd711115e664
Member since 2005 • 8956 Posts

[QUOTE="WWIAB"]MS will still Win, Obtaining Information from a Console without permission from the owner? I believe you wave that right every time you log in to Xbox live, They will not sell the information, but you submitted it willingly, and I believe MS can monitor the console and your information freelyVandalvideo
If such a disclaimer was not adequately presented, then Microsoft could still lose on misrepresentation charges. But those are mere slaps on the wrist.

Adequately presented? Keep in mind a number of people have consoles that oveheat because they sit them on carpet....which every console manual since the SNES said not to do. Keep in mind a number of people who have no idea that you can legally change the HDD in a PS3 even though a portion of the PS3s manual specifically explains how to do this.

The fact is most people are idiots who don't bother to look at the manuals, let alone ever read them cover to cover. And frankly, ignorance is no defense.

Avatar image for Animal-Mother
Animal-Mother

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#205 Animal-Mother
Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts

Listen I'm not for piracy , I agree more so it's a problem for developers they don't get the revenues, no sequel plus they have to put food on their tables.. But If these pirates knew the consequences why even connect your system to live at all?

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#206 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="mythrol"] Have you see the xboxlive TOS screen? It covers the whole screen. There's no way to miss it as you can't progress any further without "reading" it.

You would be amazed at just how asanine misrepresentation cases can get.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#207 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
And frankly, ignorance is no defense.ZIMdoom
It is in tort law.
Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#208 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
[QUOTE="ZIMdoom"] And frankly, ignorance is no defense.Vandalvideo
It is in tort law.

What are you talking about? If you don't read a contract or terms of agreement and you violate it then youc an plead ignorance? You're mistaken.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#209 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"] What are you talking about? If you don't read a contract or terms of agreement and you violate it then youc an plead ignorance? You're mistaken.

Ignorance can be a defense in tort law; it depends on just how the information was presented. It is a reasonableness standard. Even if there was some indepth legal jargon in the depths of the contract which you signed, you could still reasonably get out of the arrangement. Besides, you're not really pleading ignorance. The focus in a tort case is entirely on the company, not the plaintiff. It does not matter how ignorant you were. It is merely about the language of the contract itself.
Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#210 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"] What are you talking about? If you don't read a contract or terms of agreement and you violate it then youc an plead ignorance? You're mistaken.Vandalvideo
Ignorance can be a defense in tort law; it depends on just how the information was presented. It is a reasonableness standard. Even if there was some indepth legal jargon in the depths of the contract which you signed, you could still reasonably get out of the arrangement. Besides, you're not really pleading ignorance. The focus in a tort case is entirely on the company, not the plaintiff. It does not matter how ignorant you were. It is merely about the language of the contract itself.

Which not only is clear in the ToU but also any reasonable person would know that pirating software or going to great lengths to modify a 360 is not going to be legal.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#211 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"] Which not only is clear in the ToU but also any reasonable person would know that pirating software or going to great lengths to modify a 360 is not going to be legal.

Clear to you, but on a stanford-binet scale of intelligence, you may be in the upper echelon of society. It would be presumptuous of you to extrapolate from your own understanding of the contract to that of the average joe. Heck, you could be the smartest man alive, completely understand the contract and STILL win a misrepresentation case against a company. Explaining the intricacies of tort law is not something to be done on a gaming forum. :|
Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#212 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"] Which not only is clear in the ToU but also any reasonable person would know that pirating software or going to great lengths to modify a 360 is not going to be legal.Vandalvideo
Clear to you, but on a stanford-binet scale of intelligence, you may be in the upper echelon of society. It would be presumptuous of you to extrapolate from your own understanding of the contract to that of the average joe. Heck, you could be the smartest man alive, completely understand the contract and STILL win a misrepresentation case against a company. Explaining the intricacies of tort law is not something to be done on a gaming forum. :|

5. How You May Not Use the Service. In using the Service, you may not: use the Service for commercial purposes (except as expressly permitted by us); engage in, facilitate, or further unlawful conduct; use the Service in a way that harms us or our advertisers, affiliates, resellers, distributors, or vendors , or any customer of ours or our advertisers, affiliates, resellers, distributors, or vendors; use any portion of the Service as a destination linked from any unsolicited bulk messages or unsolicited commercial messages ("spam"); or send, either directly or indirectly, any spam through the Service; use any automated process or service to access and/or use the Service (such as a BOT, a spider, periodic caching of information stored by Microsoft, or "meta-searching"); use any unauthorized means to modify or reroute, or attempt to modify or reroute, the Service; damage, disable, overburden, or impair the Service (or the networks connected to the Service) or interfere with anyone else's ability to access or use the Service; resell or redistribute the Service, or any part of the Service; disrupt, or try to gain unauthorized access to : any account, computer, hardware, or network related to the Service; obtain (or try to obtain) any data from the Service or related hardware, except data that we intend to provide or make available to you; use the Service or related hardware to design, develop, or update unauthorized software; use or distribute unauthorized cheats, macros, or scripts; or exploit a bug, or make an unauthorized modification, to any software or data to gain unfair advantage in a game , contest, or promotion. In addition, your use of the Service is subject to your compliance with the Code of Conduct (www.xbox.com/en-us/live/codeofconduct.htm and its successors). You agree that we may also discontinue your access to the Service if you do any of the following while connected to the Service: Defame, abuse, harass, stalk, threaten, or otherwise violate the legal rights (such as rights of privacy and publicity) of others; Publish, distribute, or disseminate any inappropriate, profane, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, or unlawful content, topic, name, material, file, or information; Publish, distribute, or disseminate any content, topic, name, material, file, or information that incites, advocates, promotes, depicts, constitutes, or expresses child pornography, profanity, hatred, bigotry, racism, illegal drug use, gratuitous or graphic violence, or criminal or fraudulent activity; Create a Gamertag , avatar or use text in other profile fields that may offend other members. This includes comments that look, sound like, stand for, hint at, abbreviate, or insinuate or relate to any of the following: profane words/phrases, topics or content of a sexual nature, hate speech (including but not limited to racial, ethnic, or religious slurs), illegal drugs/controlled substances, or illegal activities; Use the Service or any material or information made available through the Service in any manner that infringes any copyright, trademark, patent, trade secret, or other proprietary right of us or any third party; Upload files that contain viruses, Trojan horses, worms, time bombs, cancelbots, corrupted files, or any other similar software or programs that may damage the operation of the Service, another person's original Xbox , Xbox 360 console , or other property; Download or use any material sent or provided by another user of the Service that you know, or reasonably should know, cannot be legally shared or distributed in such manner (except as expressly permitted by us); Send, either directly or indirectly, any unsolicited bulk messages or unsolicited commercial communications; Participate in pyramid schemes or chain letters; Harvest or otherwise collect information about others, including e-mail addresses, without their consent; Create a false identity for the purpose of misleading others; Falsify or delete any author attributions, legal or other proper notices, or proprietary designations or labels of the origin or source of software or other material contained in a file that is transferred; Make false complaints or provide false feedback about other users of the Service; Use, download, or otherwise copy, or provide to a third party (whether or not for a fee) any: (i) directory of users of the Service, (ii) information about users of the Service, or (iii) Service usage information; View, intercept, or attempt to intercept private communications not intended for you; Violate any relevant law or posted guidelines or codes relating to the use of the Service; or Provide or offer to provide services for the provision of gambling or wagering. from the terms of XBL - these are not written in complex legal jardon *insert little yellow face here*
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#213 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"] from the terms of XBL - these are not written in complex legal jardon *insert little yellow face here*

Yeah, I've read the TOU as well. However, there are dozens of legal issues with TOU agreements which I wouldn't have time to expand upon. Suffice it to say, legal jargon is merely one type of mitigating factor which could contribute to a misrepresentation case, but it is by far and away not the only one. Again, I repeat myself, merely because you find it reasonable does not necessarily mean it is reasonable. The jury is still out on the subject. I go back to my original statement which; in lack of an official juridic decision;

Microsoft could still very well lose a misrepresentation case

That much is entirely true. It depends on the test the judge employs, and which type of misrepresentation is being argued.
Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#214 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

Legal Wall of Text blue_hazy_basic

Oi!! My head hurt just looking at that, never even mind reading it :P

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#215 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"] Legal Wall of Text AdobeArtist

Oi!! My head hurt just looking at that, never even mind reading it :P

You really should read it, considering there is a part which gives Microsoft the authority to not allow you to access arcade games like Braid which you purchased and have on your HDD. I think I made a long post about this awhile ago.
Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#216 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"] from the terms of XBL - these are not written in complex legal jardon *insert little yellow face here* Vandalvideo
Yeah, I've read the TOU as well. However, there are dozens of legal issues with TOU agreements which I wouldn't have time to expand upon. Suffice it to say, legal jargon is merely one type of mitigating factor which could contribute to a misrepresentation case, but it is by far and away not the only one. Again, I repeat myself, merely because you find it reasonable does not necessarily mean it is reasonable. The jury is still out on the subject. I go back to my original statement which; in lack of an official juridic decision;

Microsoft could still very well lose a misrepresentation case

That much is entirely true. It depends on the test the judge employs, and which type of misrepresentation is being argued.

Well time will see how many of those 1 million ban users win their cases vs MS :)
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#217 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50069 Posts
Arn't they, by pursuing this lawsuit, practically admitting that they pirated games? Which, pirating in of itself, is a crime punishable by jail time and/or massive fines? Microsoft should counter-sue and claim damages by the hackers.
Avatar image for real45
real45

548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#218 real45
Member since 2006 • 548 Posts

I think its just right, all they have to do is buy a new (affordable)console and use it legally. If MS were to outright ban the user from using the service ever. I think that would be too harsh.

Avatar image for TheAxeMurderer
TheAxeMurderer

201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#219 TheAxeMurderer
Member since 2007 • 201 Posts

[QUOTE="BlackTragedy"]

lol who cares if they banned the hackers at a time so they would feel the pain. Microsoft can ban them when they want and thats the risk of being a hacker.

OneLazyAsian

Yes, cause wanting a reasonably priced HDD is hacking.

No, wanting one isn't hacking. Hacking your Xbox to use one IS hacking though, believe it or not...
Avatar image for mdisen2
mdisen2

1133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#220 mdisen2
Member since 2005 • 1133 Posts

I applaud Microsoft for doing this.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#221 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

I applaud Microsoft for doing this.

mdisen2

MS can do no wrong for some people.

[QUOTE="hot114"]

* Disabling/altering Xbox functionality *NOT* associated with Xbox Live or piracy (HDD functionality for example);

* Disabling/altering Xbox functionality *NOT* associated with piracy (Netflix, game add-ons, music, and arcade games for example);

Furthermore, Xbox console functions that have nothing to do with piracy were also affected or disabled.

hot114



Anyone who uses a regular HDD instead of the overpriced 100$ HDD's microsoft wants to milk you with is a likely target for theyr wrath.

It's funny that overpriced items isn't robbery itself.

Avatar image for thunderf00t
thunderf00t

948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#222 thunderf00t
Member since 2009 • 948 Posts

I don't think it worked. I was shopping around today and saw cases full of Xbox 360 systems, only one Wii, (they had previously had excess units at most locations) and sold out of the PS3 Slims. At Wal-Mart they put back out some unsold 160GB Phats bundled with Uncharted. But you can get a 250GB Slim for that price, then just go get Uncharted used next door at gamestop for as little as twenty bucks, so that seems like a raw deal to me.

Avatar image for lordthreedog
lordthreedog

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#223 lordthreedog
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
this doesn;t surprise me at all. microsoft is one of the biggest corporations on earth, of course its going to maximise profits.
Avatar image for Animal-Mother
Animal-Mother

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#224 Animal-Mother
Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts
Arn't they, by pursuing this lawsuit, practically admitting that they pirated games? Which, pirating in of itself, is a crime punishable by jail time and/or massive fines? Microsoft should counter-sue and claim damages by the hackers.Stevo_the_gamer
See I agree with this, and your right. I'm a theories man, so it does make a little sense that the bans did come at a weird time. I mean I have plenty of friends who have gotten banned, but prior to this never even worried about it. All in all it's good to crack down on the pirates.
Avatar image for InfiniteBlak
InfiniteBlak

794

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#225 InfiniteBlak
Member since 2009 • 794 Posts
typical MS, always looking to cash in on its customers.
Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#226 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

typical MS, always looking to cash in on its customers.InfiniteBlak

Since when are pirates customers?

Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#227 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
typical MS, always looking to cash in on its customers.InfiniteBlak
You didn't even take the time to read the OP, did you? Just saw the title and decided to hit that poor old '+ New Message' button.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#228 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="navyguy21"][QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="mythrol"] First. They CAN still Buy AND Play games. Microsoft did NOT brick the system. Just stopped them from connecting to XBL, and being able to store games to the HDD (both smart moves). Second. If you have a modded system, specifically with the purpose of playing pirated games. . .how many games were you actually BUYING?

I can see the online cheating thing, but why the hard drive? If they're so afraid of game hacking, why not encrypt the contents to tamper-harden them? Doing that, they could also allow the use of external USB Mass Storage devices for all gaming tasks, which would make a tempting selling point.

Because even if you encrypt them, hackers will still find a way if they have free access to the HDD like they would with 3rd party hard drives. I know its not easy to break, but opening the door just a little bit allows at least some hackers/pirates in. MS learned that the hard way last gen by using a standard PC hard drive, and the console was hacked to death, allowing people to upgrade, and even install retail games. So they closed the door this gen. I dont agree with it, but i fully understand it.

So how do Steam and other PC-centric systems (which have no choice but to use open hardware) keep hacking and cracking under control? And why can't Microsoft use a similar or tighter model?
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#229 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="InfiniteBlak"]typical MS, always looking to cash in on its customers.AdobeArtist

Since when are pirates customers?

Perhaps since they bought the console to begin with, which BTW turns a profit in and of itself.
Avatar image for Stats_
Stats_

2352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#230 Stats_
Member since 2009 • 2352 Posts

I guess MS should have sat down with the pirates, and decided a time to start banning them that suits everyone ...

How dare they "possibly" profit from defending, and upholding there own rules.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#231 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts
[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

[QUOTE="InfiniteBlak"]typical MS, always looking to cash in on its customers.HuusAsking

Since when are pirates customers?

Perhaps since they bought the console to begin with, which BTW turns a profit in and of itself.

which is then nullified by any piracy there after...
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#232 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
yet another pointless MS bashing thread, read your TOU, there is no way these actions are going to win, the timing of the ban is irrelevent in the eyes of the law, there is no law that states you cannot time a ban to maximise profits.
Avatar image for RedruM_I
RedruM_I

3051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#233 RedruM_I
Member since 2009 • 3051 Posts

[QUOTE="navyguy21"][QUOTE="HuusAsking"]I can see the online cheating thing, but why the hard drive? If they're so afraid of game hacking, why not encrypt the contents to tamper-harden them? Doing that, they could also allow the use of external USB Mass Storage devices for all gaming tasks, which would make a tempting selling point.HuusAsking
Because even if you encrypt them, hackers will still find a way if they have free access to the HDD like they would with 3rd party hard drives. I know its not easy to break, but opening the door just a little bit allows at least some hackers/pirates in. MS learned that the hard way last gen by using a standard PC hard drive, and the console was hacked to death, allowing people to upgrade, and even install retail games. So they closed the door this gen. I dont agree with it, but i fully understand it.

So how do Steam and other PC-centric systems (which have no choice but to use open hardware) keep hacking and cracking under control? And why can't Microsoft use a similar or tighter model?

Exactly, this is just another way for M$ to promote their monopolistic activities and make EVERYTHING their property. Luckily they are now being sued, I hope they lose.

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6241212.html?tag=latestheadlines;title;2

Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#234 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

Since when are pirates customers?

WilliamRLBaker

Perhaps since they bought the console to begin with, which BTW turns a profit in and of itself.

which is then nullified by any piracy there after...

And lets not forget, as conventional wisdom dictates, that the REAL long term profits for all the companies is in the software sales. That's why they're willing to take a hit on the hardware costs early on during the initial introduction when that isn't bringing in the profits.

Avatar image for Stats_
Stats_

2352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#235 Stats_
Member since 2009 • 2352 Posts

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="navyguy21"]Because even if you encrypt them, hackers will still find a way if they have free access to the HDD like they would with 3rd party hard drives. I know its not easy to break, but opening the door just a little bit allows at least some hackers/pirates in. MS learned that the hard way last gen by using a standard PC hard drive, and the console was hacked to death, allowing people to upgrade, and even install retail games. So they closed the door this gen. I dont agree with it, but i fully understand it.RedruM_I

So how do Steam and other PC-centric systems (which have no choice but to use open hardware) keep hacking and cracking under control? And why can't Microsoft use a similar or tighter model?

Exactly, this is just another way for M$ to promote their monopolistic activities and make EVERYTHING their property. Luckily they are now being sued, I hope they lose.

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6241212.html?tag=latestheadlines;title;2

The situation isn't the same. STEAM and such like don't own the PC. Microsoft own the Xbox. They do a good job in keeping thing undercontrol, as they have no choice but to keep things on there end.

MS on the other hand can simple disable your console functions. And they're within right i believe.

You may think it's not fair, and that MS are just looking to make money, but who cares what you think? They're pirates ...

Avatar image for RedruM_I
RedruM_I

3051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#236 RedruM_I
Member since 2009 • 3051 Posts

[QUOTE="RedruM_I"]

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"]So how do Steam and other PC-centric systems (which have no choice but to use open hardware) keep hacking and cracking under control? And why can't Microsoft use a similar or tighter model?Stats_

Exactly, this is just another way for M$ to promote their monopolistic activities and make EVERYTHING their property. Luckily they are now being sued, I hope they lose.

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6241212.html?tag=latestheadlines;title;2

The situation isn't the same. STEAM and such like don't own the PC. Microsoft own the Xbox. They do a good job in keeping thing undercontrol, as they have no choice but to keep things on there end.

MS on the other hand can simple disable your console functions. And they're within right i believe.

You may think it's not fair, and that MS are just looking to make money, but who cares what you think? They're pirates ...

I'm not defending pirates but they locking foreign memory hardware is a sign of things o come (the link was from a lawsuit of a hardware company not the pirates lawsuit). They can do whatever they want but it is the same kind of practices they do on the computer business and that hint at a monopoly. I'm pretty sure that for them locking access of third party memory units is not a move they are interested to promote to defeat pirates (the other companies don't do such things and they have other means to deal with pirates) but they do it to monopolize with their proprietary stuff. The exact same kind of BS they do on the computer world.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#237 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

oh noes!!! are people ripping off software pirates??? poor widdle pirates, there they are just innocently stealing things and teh big bad corporation come in and starts acting all greedy...

this changes my whole attitude towards property, before if i caught someone burgularizing my home i prolly woulda got upset but now i know i should just consider them houseguests and help them to their van with my property, after all i would not want to be greedy with my stuff would i?

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#238 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45548 Posts

[QUOTE="Stats_"]

[QUOTE="RedruM_I"]

Exactly, this is just another way for M$ to promote their monopolistic activities and make EVERYTHING their property. Luckily they are now being sued, I hope they lose.

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6241212.html?tag=latestheadlines;title;2

RedruM_I

The situation isn't the same. STEAM and such like don't own the PC. Microsoft own the Xbox. They do a good job in keeping thing undercontrol, as they have no choice but to keep things on there end.

MS on the other hand can simple disable your console functions. And they're within right i believe.

You may think it's not fair, and that MS are just looking to make money, but who cares what you think? They're pirates ...

I'm not defending pirates but they locking foreign memory hardware is a sign of things o come (the link was from a lawsuit of a hardware company not the pirates lawsuit). They can do whatever they want but it is the same kind of practices they do on the computer business and that hint at a monopoly. I'm pretty sure that for them locking access of third party memory units is not a move they are interested to promote to defeat pirates (the other companies don't do such things and they have other means to deal with pirates) but they do it to monopolize with their proprietary stuff. The exact same kind of BS they do on the computer world.

Curious, do you find it appalling that Sony has a monopoly on B.R. and should that evil be remedied so MS & "N" can share & share alike? :twisted:

Avatar image for RedruM_I
RedruM_I

3051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#239 RedruM_I
Member since 2009 • 3051 Posts

[QUOTE="RedruM_I"][QUOTE="Stats_"]

The situation isn't the same. STEAM and such like don't own the PC. Microsoft own the Xbox. They do a good job in keeping thing undercontrol, as they have no choice but to keep things on there end.

MS on the other hand can simple disable your console functions. And they're within right i believe.

You may think it's not fair, and that MS are just looking to make money, but who cares what you think? They're pirates ...

SecretPolice

I'm not defending pirates but they locking foreign memory hardware is a sign of things o come (the link was from a lawsuit of a hardware company not the pirates lawsuit). They can do whatever they want but it is the same kind of practices they do on the computer business and that hint at a monopoly. I'm pretty sure that for them locking access of third party memory units is not a move they are interested to promote to defeat pirates (the other companies don't do such things and they have other means to deal with pirates) but they do it to monopolize with their proprietary stuff. The exact same kind of BS they do on the computer world.

Curious, do you find it appalling that Sony has a monopoly on B.R. and should that evil be remedied so MS & "N" can share & share alike? :twisted:

BluRay? Do you see Sony trying to prevent other manufacturers to produce or use Bluray players or Bluray didcs working only on Sony devices? That would be the equivalent of M$ doing what they love to do.
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#240 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45548 Posts

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

[QUOTE="RedruM_I"] I'm not defending pirates but they locking foreign memory hardware is a sign of things o come (the link was from a lawsuit of a hardware company not the pirates lawsuit). They can do whatever they want but it is the same kind of practices they do on the computer business and that hint at a monopoly. I'm pretty sure that for them locking access of third party memory units is not a move they are interested to promote to defeat pirates (the other companies don't do such things and they have other means to deal with pirates) but they do it to monopolize with their proprietary stuff. The exact same kind of BS they do on the computer world.RedruM_I

Curious, do you find it appalling that Sony has a monopoly on B.R. and should that evil be remedied so MS & "N" can share & share alike? :twisted:

BluRay? Do you see Sony trying to prevent other manufacturers to produce or use Bluray players or Bluray didcs working only on Sony devices?That would be the equivalent of M$ doing what they love to do.

Not without a fee they don't, I mean, do you think others should have to pay Sony for the licencing or can others just go ahead & pirate it since ya know, it's to much like a monopoly. :P

Avatar image for Zaibach
Zaibach

13466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#241 Zaibach
Member since 2007 • 13466 Posts

strange how they all get banned at the same time right before the holiday season....ms you done it again, bravo!!!

Avatar image for RedruM_I
RedruM_I

3051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#242 RedruM_I
Member since 2009 • 3051 Posts

[QUOTE="RedruM_I"][QUOTE="SecretPolice"]Curious, do you find it appalling that Sony has a monopoly on B.R. and should that evil be remedied so MS & "N" can share & share alike? :twisted:

SecretPolice

BluRay? Do you see Sony trying to prevent other manufacturers to produce or use Bluray players or Bluray didcs working only on Sony devices?That would be the equivalent of M$ doing what they love to do.

Not without a fee they don't, I mean, do you think others should have to pay Sony for the licencing or can others just go ahead & pirate it since ya know, it's to much like a monopoly. :P

Well of course they make money from it it's their product. M$ what is doing is restricting access to manufacturers that are not them much like they restrict software developers (which have their own products it's not like they are doing their own Windows version which is equivalent as to what you're claiming with BluRay) to their own exclusive protocols and windows environments. It's all part of their monopoly scheme. Sony does not do that.
Avatar image for deactivated-5dd711115e664
deactivated-5dd711115e664

8956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#243 deactivated-5dd711115e664
Member since 2005 • 8956 Posts

[QUOTE="mdisen2"] MS can do no wrong for some people. [QUOTE="hot114"]

[QUOTE="hot114"]

* Disabling/altering Xbox functionality *NOT* associated with Xbox Live or piracy (HDD functionality for example);

* Disabling/altering Xbox functionality *NOT* associated with piracy (Netflix, game add-ons, music, and arcade games for example);

Furthermore, Xbox console functions that have nothing to do with piracy were also affected or disabled.

LOXO7



Anyone who uses a regular HDD instead of the overpriced 100$ HDD's microsoft wants to milk you with is a likely target for theyr wrath.

It's funny that overpriced items isn't robbery itself.

Hey, I hate MS and am no fan of the Xbox. You can check my post history to see for yourself. But I support MS's right to do this. Yes, the HDD is a rip off and MS making a money grab.I've openly mocked them for years regarding their idiotic decision to NOT make HDD standardafterthey mockedSony and Nintedo about standard HDD being the future of gaming and an absolute necessity. I've openlymocked them for insisting to the public HDD would be standard in the 360 when, behind the scenes, they were telling developers the exact opposite.MS has ripped off their cusomters with this HDD decision. But you know what, if customers don't like it and wanted the ability to replace the HDD theirself, then they should have bought the PS3 instead. They bought the Xbox and whether they like the peripherals or not, they violated their terms of use and have no right to now turn around and cry about it.

Like it or not, MS is fully within their rights here.

Avatar image for trick91_basic
trick91_basic

1184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#244 trick91_basic
Member since 2002 • 1184 Posts

so many people misinformed on this thread:

1. You dont get banned for having a custom hard drive. Yes they have made it so you cant use Datel drives anymore but NO WAY are you getting banned for having it.

2. The only people being banned are who modified their dvd firmware. And the only reason to do that is to pirate games. Period. There is no grey area for this at all. They figured out a way to detect people who have their dvd firmware modified.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#245 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45548 Posts

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

[QUOTE="RedruM_I"] BluRay? Do you see Sony trying to prevent other manufacturers to produce or use Bluray players or Bluray didcs working only on Sony devices?That would be the equivalent of M$ doing what they love to do.RedruM_I

Not without a fee they don't, I mean, do you think others should have to pay Sony for the licencing or can others just go ahead & pirate it since ya know, it's to much like a monopoly. :P

Well of course they make money from it it's their product. M$ what is doing is restricting access to manufacturers that are not them much like they restrict software developers (which have their own products it's not like they are doing their own Windows version which is equivalent as to what you're claiming with BluRay) to their own exclusive protocols and windows environments. It's all part of their monopoly scheme. Sony does not do that.

The thread is about pirates who stole software by modifying a MS system and got banned for doing so. And yeah ( let me try that ) .......

$ony lol tries but is not as successful at it - does that make them better ? :P

Avatar image for RedruM_I
RedruM_I

3051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#246 RedruM_I
Member since 2009 • 3051 Posts

[QUOTE="RedruM_I"][QUOTE="SecretPolice"]Not without a fee they don't, I mean, do you think others should have to pay Sony for the licencing or can others just go ahead & pirate it since ya know, it's to much like a monopoly. :P

SecretPolice

Well of course they make money from it it's their product. M$ what is doing is restricting access to manufacturers that are not them much like they restrict software developers (which have their own products it's not like they are doing their own Windows version which is equivalent as to what you're claiming with BluRay) to their own exclusive protocols and windows environments. It's all part of their monopoly scheme. Sony does not do that.

The thread is about pirates who stole software by modifying a MS system and got banned for doing so. And yeah ( let me try that ) .......

$ony lol tries but is not as successful at it - does that make them better ? :P

No, they are not trying to do that. The PS3 was as open as it could get to hardware manufactureres from the beginning even accepting any fitting HD. The option to install linux also gave the possibility to use many kinds of software not Sony exclusive. M$ works as a monopoly, Sony doesn't.
Avatar image for Animal-Mother
Animal-Mother

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#247 Animal-Mother
Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts

Curious, do you find it appalling that Sony has a monopoly on B.R. and should that evil be remedied so MS & "N" can share & share alike? :twisted:SecretPolice
Sony Has a monopoly on Blu-ray? Really? http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=Blue-ray+player&x=0&y=0

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#248 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45548 Posts

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"] Curious, do you find it appalling that Sony has a monopoly on B.R. and should that evil be remedied so MS & "N" can share & share alike? :twisted:Animal-Mother

Sony Has a monopoly on Blu-ray? Really? http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=Blue-ray+player&x=0&y=0

I know it's not really a monopoly but just making a point. Can MS just go ahead and produce a B.R. 360 without licence to do so and does Sony get $$$$ if or when MS would go B.R. ? In other words, can't they just pirate it ya know, like what people are trying really hard in this thread to excuse ?

Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#249 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

so many people misinformed on this thread:

1. You dont get banned for having a custom hard drive. Yes they have made it so you cant use Datel drives anymore but NO WAY are you getting banned for having it.

2. The only people being banned are who modified their dvd firmware. And the only reason to do that is to pirate games. Period. There is no grey area for this at all. They figured out a way to detect people who have their dvd firmware modified.

trick91_basic

This. Do you see THIS, fanboys? That's called reason and logic!! And you too can enjoy the benfits such perspective once you take off your tinfoil caps :)

Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#250 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts

strange how they all get banned at the same time right before the holiday season....ms you done it again, bravo!!!

Zaibach
My God, do people not read anymore? This point has been addressed about....oh, ten times. :roll: