Microsoft,we don't want your LIVE in our PC games...Go away!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for stephant_6
stephant_6

1758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#1 stephant_6
Member since 2005 • 1758 Posts

Seriously Microsoft,don't try and infect PC gaming aswell with your shoddy service. Incorporating 360's with PC's is the worst idea ever. We don't want live and we don't want 360 games! No hermit wants to play Halo 3 on PC and pay 5 bucks a month for friends lists! I'm perfectly fine playing BF2 online for free with 64 people thanks.

NOTE: I know none of this stuff has happened yet,but you can see this is what Microsoft is trying to start here. They've already incorporated live into shadowrun and gears pc. Soon they'll port Halo 3, then other componies will join windows live,and eventually we'll be paying monthly to pc game!

Avatar image for deadmeat59
deadmeat59

8981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#2 deadmeat59
Member since 2003 • 8981 Posts
console online sucks
Avatar image for stereointegrity
stereointegrity

12151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 stereointegrity
Member since 2007 • 12151 Posts
why not microsoft knows what there doing and this service will be a blast
Avatar image for bignice12
bignice12

2124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 bignice12
Member since 2003 • 2124 Posts

why not microsoft knows what there doing and this service will be a blaststereointegrity

No, if you played any games using it currently you would know it is a total disaster and is not something that is recieved well by PC gamers that have been recieving an even better online service for free for a long time now.

Avatar image for SaintsRowSam
SaintsRowSam

2807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 SaintsRowSam
Member since 2006 • 2807 Posts
you wouldent even be playing pc games if it wasnt for microsoft.....
Avatar image for stereointegrity
stereointegrity

12151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 stereointegrity
Member since 2007 • 12151 Posts

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"]why not microsoft knows what there doing and this service will be a blastbignice12

No, if you played any games using it currently you would know it is a total disaster and is not something that is recieved well by PC gamers that have been recieving an even better online service for free for a long time now.

still microsoft knows how to make it work so all hermits will benefit and lemmings will benefit...its really an amazing service
Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18255 Posts

i have nothing against live per se. but if MS can think they can charge for it....well they can try i suppose. personally i wont be touching the paid for stuff on live though (i also dont use live gold on my 360).

still on PC, playing with other PCs is free so im happy enough with that.

Avatar image for NWA_31
NWA_31

11922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 NWA_31
Member since 2006 • 11922 Posts

Totally agreed.

They can do what the heck they want with their Xboxes, but leave the PC alone.

Avatar image for elektrixxx
elektrixxx

11804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 elektrixxx
Member since 2004 • 11804 Posts
But dude... there's points!
Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#12 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts
LIVE seems to be only in Microsoft published games, I don't think third party devs want their games controlled by Microsoft.
Avatar image for MushroomRevenge
MushroomRevenge

293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 MushroomRevenge
Member since 2007 • 293 Posts
I wouldn't mind Live on my PC, as long as it doesn't cost anything and doesn't screw with the games any.
Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
I'm perfectly fine playing BF2 online for free with 64 people thanks.stephant_6
Just because somebody else is paying it for you doesn't mean it's free. ~$60/mo to rent a 64 player BF2 server. Somebody's paying it, and it's not MS.
Avatar image for UnknownSniper65
UnknownSniper65

9238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 UnknownSniper65
Member since 2004 • 9238 Posts
technically playing BF2 isn't free...someone else is just forking over the money for you....those servers are anything but cheap
Avatar image for gamenux
gamenux

5308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 gamenux
Member since 2006 • 5308 Posts

why not microsoft knows what there doing and this service will be a blaststereointegrity

I guess you like paying for everything. How about making you pay to get your rrod fixed...... Let's remove that warranty.

Avatar image for bignice12
bignice12

2124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 bignice12
Member since 2003 • 2124 Posts

still microsoft knows how to make it work so all hermits will benefit and lemmings will benefit...its really an amazing service
stereointegrity

How will PC gamers benefit from it? Have you used the service yourself? It will never ever be on the same level as something such as steam.

Avatar image for stereointegrity
stereointegrity

12151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 stereointegrity
Member since 2007 • 12151 Posts

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"]why not microsoft knows what there doing and this service will be a blastgamenux

I guess you like paying for everything. How about making you pay to get your rrod fixed...... Let's remove that warranty.

even with the RROD its still the best console out...it also is good for pc gaming cause pc gaming has been slow as of late
Avatar image for Jynxzor
Jynxzor

9313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Jynxzor
Member since 2003 • 9313 Posts

you wouldent even be playing pc games if it wasnt for microsoft.....SaintsRowSam

So your telling me MS would have been the only company to release OS, the world would crumble because MS didn't release a good OS and no one else would step up.

Personally MS got really lucky with the OS market they got in at just the right time with the right product the rest was up to fate.

Avatar image for karasill
karasill

3155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 karasill
Member since 2007 • 3155 Posts
why not microsoft knows what there doing and this service will be a blaststereointegrity
NO :| WE like our free online play, thank you.
Avatar image for InsaneBasura
InsaneBasura

12591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#21 InsaneBasura
Member since 2005 • 12591 Posts

Yes yes a thousand times yet. The ****ty piece of garbage known as Windows Live wouldn't allow me to play Kane & Lynch online. Got an error code every time it tried to download account information or whatever. I do not understand why any company would willingly allow Microsoft to infect their game with that bugridden disease. Even if it would work, it does absolutely nothing but shove a layer of annoying login screens and worthless crap in your face. I don't want to log onto your ****ty service, I want to play the game you rotten bunch of arsefaces.

Luckily the very vast majority of companies are steering clear of this trainwreck.

Avatar image for stereointegrity
stereointegrity

12151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 stereointegrity
Member since 2007 • 12151 Posts
[QUOTE="stereointegrity"]why not microsoft knows what there doing and this service will be a blastkarasill
NO :| WE like our free online play, thank you.

ok im doing acting like Reyes360
Avatar image for HoldThePhone
HoldThePhone

3364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 HoldThePhone
Member since 2007 • 3364 Posts
[QUOTE="bignice12"]

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"]why not microsoft knows what there doing and this service will be a blaststereointegrity

No, if you played any games using it currently you would know it is a total disaster and is not something that is recieved well by PC gamers that have been recieving an even better online service for free for a long time now.

still microsoft knows how to make it work so all hermits will benefit and lemmings will benefit...its really an amazing service

No. Stop.

Hermits have had better service than anyone else for the past 15 years. Console gamers finally get 16 player matches on their Xboxs with the ability to record footage and there games are getting perfect scores because of it.

You guys are like 3 gens behind and we don't want to be dragged down with you.

Avatar image for thrones
thrones

12178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 thrones
Member since 2004 • 12178 Posts

why not microsoft knows what there doing and this service will be a blaststereointegrity

No..just..no..Steam all the way.

Avatar image for SaintsRowSam
SaintsRowSam

2807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#25 SaintsRowSam
Member since 2006 • 2807 Posts

[QUOTE="SaintsRowSam"]you wouldent even be playing pc games if it wasnt for microsoft.....Jynxzor

So your telling me MS would have been the only company to release OS, the world would crumble because MS didn't release a good OS and no one else would step up.

Personally MS got really lucky with the OS market they got in at just the right time with the right product the rest was up to fate.

now i bet we can both agree that the Mac has really poor ports of games that were originally on windows. and i bet as of right now you buy ONLY windows games. windows= microsoft. what you play pc games on= windows. so i stay true to my statement as you wouldent be playing games if it werent for microsoft

Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="bignice12"]

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"]why not microsoft knows what there doing and this service will be a blastHoldThePhone

No, if you played any games using it currently you would know it is a total disaster and is not something that is recieved well by PC gamers that have been recieving an even better online service for free for a long time now.

still microsoft knows how to make it work so all hermits will benefit and lemmings will benefit...its really an amazing service

No. Stop.

Hermits have had better service than anyone else for the past 15 years. Console gamers finally get 16 player matches on their Xboxs with the ability to record footage and there games are getting perfect scores because of it.

You guys are like 3 gens behind and we don't want to be dragged down with you.

though i do agree with you, honestly, under the current service we have people paying to run our games. with consoles, they don't have to pay for us to play anymore. why would they continue supporting us? TLDR i think most pc gamers are spoiled whiny brats, me included
Avatar image for EuroMafia
EuroMafia

7026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 EuroMafia
Member since 2008 • 7026 Posts
Looks like you need a Mac :P
Avatar image for karasill
karasill

3155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 karasill
Member since 2007 • 3155 Posts
[QUOTE="Jynxzor"]

[QUOTE="SaintsRowSam"]you wouldent even be playing pc games if it wasnt for microsoft.....SaintsRowSam

So your telling me MS would have been the only company to release OS, the world would crumble because MS didn't release a good OS and no one else would step up.

Personally MS got really lucky with the OS market they got in at just the right time with the right product the rest was up to fate.

now i bet we can both agree that the Mac has really poor ports of games that were originally on windows. and i bet as of right now you buy ONLY windows games. windows= microsoft. what you play pc games on= windows. so i stay true to my statement as you wouldent be playing games if it werent for microsoft

Yes we would. If Microsoft never came out with an OS, all of our computers would have Apple's OS or Linux. Devs would have made games specifically for them and everything would have been okay. We still would have had our games.
Avatar image for SpinoRaptor
SpinoRaptor

2419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 SpinoRaptor
Member since 2006 • 2419 Posts
If MS put Live in PC games...Who is going to stop them?
Avatar image for InsaneBasura
InsaneBasura

12591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#30 InsaneBasura
Member since 2005 • 12591 Posts

Maybe telling them by not purchasing their products would be a better way to get your message across, unless you think posting on a message board that they probably don't or won't ever read helps... :wink:farrell2k

Even though this wasn't directed at me, I shall reply. I bought Kane & Lynch knowing it featured Windows Live, but I did not know, nor could I imagine, how royally stupid it actually was. But I can assure you that in the future, if a PC game I'm interested in sports the LIVE logo, I will buy it as little as humanly possible.

Avatar image for rimnet00
rimnet00

11003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#31 rimnet00
Member since 2003 • 11003 Posts
It's why I didn't buy GeoW for the PC.
Avatar image for SaintsRowSam
SaintsRowSam

2807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#32 SaintsRowSam
Member since 2006 • 2807 Posts
[QUOTE="SaintsRowSam"][QUOTE="Jynxzor"]

[QUOTE="SaintsRowSam"]you wouldent even be playing pc games if it wasnt for microsoft.....karasill

So your telling me MS would have been the only company to release OS, the world would crumble because MS didn't release a good OS and no one else would step up.

Personally MS got really lucky with the OS market they got in at just the right time with the right product the rest was up to fate.

now i bet we can both agree that the Mac has really poor ports of games that were originally on windows. and i bet as of right now you buy ONLY windows games. windows= microsoft. what you play pc games on= windows. so i stay true to my statement as you wouldent be playing games if it werent for microsoft

Yes we would. If Microsoft never came out with an OS, all of our computers would have Apple's OS or Linux. Devs would have made games specifically for them and everything would have been okay. We still would have had our games.

if they came out for apple, i could guarentee PC gaming wouldent even be alive! look how poorly its doing from ports. Apple's OS wasnt neccesarily designed for games. more of a entertainement OS.

Avatar image for wood_duck
wood_duck

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 wood_duck
Member since 2007 • 990 Posts
It really is a shame to see this **** come to the pc.
Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

If MS put Live in PC games...Who is going to stop them?SpinoRaptor

no, PC gamer will buy a game with that crap....every game with Windows live has been a huge disaster.

and their is nothing MS can do about it short of actually improvng everything...they dont own PC gameing...PC game devs have many other options for online standards (preferably Steam)

Avatar image for -Spock-
-Spock-

7072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 -Spock-
Member since 2006 • 7072 Posts

It's why I didn't buy GeoW for the PC. rimnet00

Illegal downloads and cracked software are the way to go.

Avatar image for karasill
karasill

3155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 karasill
Member since 2007 • 3155 Posts
[QUOTE="karasill"][QUOTE="SaintsRowSam"][QUOTE="Jynxzor"]

[QUOTE="SaintsRowSam"]you wouldent even be playing pc games if it wasnt for microsoft.....SaintsRowSam

So your telling me MS would have been the only company to release OS, the world would crumble because MS didn't release a good OS and no one else would step up.

Personally MS got really lucky with the OS market they got in at just the right time with the right product the rest was up to fate.

now i bet we can both agree that the Mac has really poor ports of games that were originally on windows. and i bet as of right now you buy ONLY windows games. windows= microsoft. what you play pc games on= windows. so i stay true to my statement as you wouldent be playing games if it werent for microsoft

Yes we would. If Microsoft never came out with an OS, all of our computers would have Apple's OS or Linux. Devs would have made games specifically for them and everything would have been okay. We still would have had our games.

if they came out for apple, i could guarentee PC gaming wouldent even be alive! look how poorly its doing from ports. Apple's OS wasnt neccesarily designed for games. more of a entertainement OS.

Ummm, that's because the ported games were designed for Windows and ported over, of course it's going to run like crap. If games were designed for Apple's OS it would be fine. If Windows never exsited then Devs would have built games from the ground up on Apple's OS, just like they do for Windows now..... I can't say it any easier dude :| We never needed MS for PC gaming. Another company like Apple or Linux would have stepped up to the plate and would have been about as big as Microsoft is now.
Avatar image for jangojay
jangojay

4044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 jangojay
Member since 2007 • 4044 Posts
Make live free and on par with steam then we will talk.
Avatar image for jangojay
jangojay

4044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 jangojay
Member since 2007 • 4044 Posts

If MS put Live in PC games...Who is going to stop them?SpinoRaptor

Backlash from PC community is.

Avatar image for SaintsRowSam
SaintsRowSam

2807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#39 SaintsRowSam
Member since 2006 • 2807 Posts
[QUOTE="SaintsRowSam"][QUOTE="karasill"][QUOTE="SaintsRowSam"][QUOTE="Jynxzor"]

[QUOTE="SaintsRowSam"]you wouldent even be playing pc games if it wasnt for microsoft.....karasill

So your telling me MS would have been the only company to release OS, the world would crumble because MS didn't release a good OS and no one else would step up.

Personally MS got really lucky with the OS market they got in at just the right time with the right product the rest was up to fate.

now i bet we can both agree that the Mac has really poor ports of games that were originally on windows. and i bet as of right now you buy ONLY windows games. windows= microsoft. what you play pc games on= windows. so i stay true to my statement as you wouldent be playing games if it werent for microsoft

Yes we would. If Microsoft never came out with an OS, all of our computers would have Apple's OS or Linux. Devs would have made games specifically for them and everything would have been okay. We still would have had our games.

if they came out for apple, i could guarentee PC gaming wouldent even be alive! look how poorly its doing from ports. Apple's OS wasnt neccesarily designed for games. more of a entertainement OS.

Ummm, that's because the ported games were designed for Windows and ported over, of course it's going to run like crap. If games were designed for Apple's OS it would be fine. If Windows never exsited then Devs would have built games from the ground up on Apple's OS, just like they do for Windows now..... I can't say it any easier dude :| We never needed MS for PC gaming. Another company like Apple or Linux would have stepped up to the plate and would have been about as big as Microsoft is now.

http://www.bit-tech.net/bits/2006/04/24/macbook_pro_apple_bootcamp/3 apples design dosent fit the pc gamers needs.

Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
Ummm, that's because the ported games were designed for Windows and ported over, of course it's going to run like crap. If games were designed for Apple's OS it would be fine. If Windows never exsited then Devs would have built games from the ground up on Apple's OS, just like they do for Windows now..... I can't say it any easier dude :| We never needed MS for PC gaming. Another company like Apple or Linux would have stepped up to the plate and would have been about as big as Microsoft is now.karasill
Part of the reason Windows works so well for gaming is Microsoft's locked-down attitude with Windows & DirectX. Before that, getting games going was a freaking nightmare, especially under DOS and the like. I mean, you can see the snafu that happened in Vista when they simply took out DirectSound, lol.
Avatar image for t3hTwinky
t3hTwinky

3701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#41 t3hTwinky
Member since 2005 • 3701 Posts
They can put their goofy Windows Live on PC games all they want, doesn't mean anybody's gonna use it. :lol:
Avatar image for karasill
karasill

3155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 karasill
Member since 2007 • 3155 Posts
[QUOTE="karasill"]Ummm, that's because the ported games were designed for Windows and ported over, of course it's going to run like crap. If games were designed for Apple's OS it would be fine. If Windows never exsited then Devs would have built games from the ground up on Apple's OS, just like they do for Windows now..... I can't say it any easier dude :| We never needed MS for PC gaming. Another company like Apple or Linux would have stepped up to the plate and would have been about as big as Microsoft is now.Makari
Part of the reason Windows works so well for gaming is Microsoft's locked-down attitude with Windows & DirectX. Before that, getting games going was a freaking nightmare, especially under DOS and the like. I mean, you can see the snafu that happened in Vista when they simply took out DirectSound, lol.

True, but I don't think anyone gets it. If Microsoft didn't exist, another company would have stepped up to the plate and taken charge. Who's to say Apple or Linux wouldn't have implemented some sort of Open GL or other graphics standard if they were given the chance to? The reason they don't now is becaue Microsoft and DirectX is too big to compete with.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
GFWL certainly does suck
Avatar image for karasill
karasill

3155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 karasill
Member since 2007 • 3155 Posts

http://www.bit-tech.net/bits/2006/04/24/macbook_pro_apple_bootcamp/3 apples design dosent fit the pc gamers needs.SaintsRowSam

FAIL... :| Windows gaming on a mac... :roll: How about mac games on a mac? If games were designed for the mac OS it would work just fine. Why don't you get this?

Avatar image for stephant_6
stephant_6

1758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#45 stephant_6
Member since 2005 • 1758 Posts

Looks like you need a Mac :PEuroMafia

Well seeing as I play games,I'm going to disregard that,but thanks for the offer..

Avatar image for wok7
wok7

2034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 wok7
Member since 2003 • 2034 Posts
M$ will do whatever it takes to bring PC Gaming back to the hardcore.
Avatar image for SaintsRowSam
SaintsRowSam

2807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#47 SaintsRowSam
Member since 2006 • 2807 Posts
[QUOTE="SaintsRowSam"][QUOTE="karasill"][QUOTE="SaintsRowSam"][QUOTE="karasill"][QUOTE="SaintsRowSam"][QUOTE="Jynxzor"]

[QUOTE="SaintsRowSam"]you wouldent even be playing pc games if it wasnt for microsoft.....karasill

So your telling me MS would have been the only company to release OS, the world would crumble because MS didn't release a good OS and no one else would step up.

Personally MS got really lucky with the OS market they got in at just the right time with the right product the rest was up to fate.

now i bet we can both agree that the Mac has really poor ports of games that were originally on windows. and i bet as of right now you buy ONLY windows games. windows= microsoft. what you play pc games on= windows. so i stay true to my statement as you wouldent be playing games if it werent for microsoft

Yes we would. If Microsoft never came out with an OS, all of our computers would have Apple's OS or Linux. Devs would have made games specifically for them and everything would have been okay. We still would have had our games.

if they came out for apple, i could guarentee PC gaming wouldent even be alive! look how poorly its doing from ports. Apple's OS wasnt neccesarily designed for games. more of a entertainement OS.

Ummm, that's because the ported games were designed for Windows and ported over, of course it's going to run like crap. If games were designed for Apple's OS it would be fine. If Windows never exsited then Devs would have built games from the ground up on Apple's OS, just like they do for Windows now..... I can't say it any easier dude :| We never needed MS for PC gaming. Another company like Apple or Linux would have stepped up to the plate and would have been about as big as Microsoft is now.

http://www.bit-tech.net/bits/2006/04/24/macbook_pro_apple_bootcamp/3 apples design dosent fit the pc gamers needs.

FAIL... :| Windows gaming on a mac... :roll: How about mac games on a mac? If games were designed for the mac OS it would work just fine. Why don't you get this?

im not talking about the game itself, im taking about the screen, the harddrive, the graphics card, etc.

Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
True, but I don't think anyone gets it. If Microsoft didn't exist, another company would have stepped up to the plate and taken charge. Who's to say Apple or Linux wouldn't have implemented some sort of Open GL or other graphics standard if they were given the chance to? The reason they don't now is becaue Microsoft and DirectX is too big to compete with.karasill
Nobody did it for a decade and a half of PC gaming. Apple had the chance, tried their way, and blew it rather hard. Their style of business is not exactly conducive to PC gaming. Just look at all the mess with people trying to get their own apps on the iPhones, heh.
Avatar image for Rougehunter
Rougehunter

5873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 Rougehunter
Member since 2004 • 5873 Posts

M$ will do whatever it takes to bring PC Gaming back to the hardcore.wok7
How is PC gaming casual when most of its games have dumbed down versions/sequals on consoles? Can you prove my and others how PC gaming can possible be more casual then consoles?

Avatar image for karasill
karasill

3155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 karasill
Member since 2007 • 3155 Posts

im not talking about the game itself, im taking about the screen, the harddrive, the graphics card, etc.SaintsRowSam
Annnnd companies like nVidia, Intel, AMD, and ATI as well as other hardware companies would have made more and better stuff on the mac then what we're currently seeing. Apple/Linux would have been MUCH bigger companies if it wasn't for Microsoft.

You assume Apple would be the same company as it is today if Microsoft didn't exist. They would have realized the market of games, and I'm sure with the help of Apple, devs would have made gaming work just fine.