Nintendo Started Gaming's Destruction: Facts, Evidence, and a History Lesson

  • 181 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

Ok, yes, the title is crazy, and no, you're not hallucinating, DarkLink is making an anti-Nintendo thread. But before your head explodes, came down, grab a drink, and hear me out.

Remember back in 1983, when there was this really bad game called E.T.? I mean, it was s***. You were E.T., and you had to go down holes or some s*** to find the pieces of a telephone to call your spaceship. Anyway, it was areallybad game. Like, a .45 going off in your pants bad. "Worst Game Ever"bad.

'Course it was made in like six weeks, but that's not important. Anyway, since the movie was super popular, Atari figured it would sell a f****** of copies, so... they made a f****** of copies.

Unfortunately, it didn't. In fact the game was so bad, Atari had to bury most of the copies in a hole somewhere. That's what you call ironic.

Anyway, the E.T. failure plus a few other issues (Too many game consoles, too many games) basically made it impossible for any gaming company to make enough money to stay afloat. Stores considered the video game fad over, and no one would stock them anymore. So the whole industry went belly up, until Nintendo released the NES and made games "cool" again. Everyone could play the NES. And everyone did. But the casuals couldn't keep up with the change in tech and all the fancy new buttons that accompanied subsequent console releases, and they gradually exited the industry. Until recently.

Nintendo is directly going to be responsible for a second video game crash. With theWii and the DS, they have set us down on a path of destruction.

"HOW?" I hear you gasp, hand flying to your mouth like some woman on a sitcom in the 1950s.

Ironically, they're going to do it by doing the same thing they did to save the video game industry with the NES. By making games for everyone.

Like it or not, traditional console and handheld gaming as we know it is over.Handheldsare being knocked out by smartphones (see the 3DSand the inevitable failure of the Vita), and consoles by multipurpose tablets and streaming devices like Apple TV andOnLive. Or at least, they will be in the near future. Point being, gaming as we knew it is on the way out.


See, this is all Nintendo's fault. With the Wii and the DS, they made gaming accessible and made the masses comfortable with the idea. You ever seen those creepy as all f*** pictures with a bunch of old people who are smiling like vicious cannibals playing a Wiior a DS? Yeah, that s*** actually happened.With the DS and Wii, everyone could play. Including your senile old great-aunt Martha. And shedid. Nintendogs,WiiSports, the whole nine yards. And even worse, she liked it.

So people got comfortable with gaming.

Companies like Apple saw this, and made it easy for their smartphones and tablets to play the same kinds of casual games for next to nothing. Problem is, when you pay jack s*** for something... it's probably not all that great. The games were basically the equivalentof the stuff small children pick out of their noses, but they were cheap to make, and they made a TON of money, because everyone and their hamster can play them, no brain required.


This leads to a glut of cheap cash-ins (see all the clones on iOS), and people begin to start thinking that all games should be this cheap.

But see, this is a fad. Casuals aren't in it for the long haul. They're like magpies. They see a new shiny thing, and they go get it, and they abandon it when there's a slightly shinnier, slightly newer thing. This market ain't gonna keep growing forever. It's gonna peak, like all things do, and regress.

As the "fad" dies out, all the companies that had invested in this s*** (which will basically be everyone so they can stay afloat, see Kinect, the Vita marketplace, etc) to begin are going to find themselves with a disturbing lack of capital. This duplicates the Crash of 1983. Nintendo has started us on the path of another video game crash by doing the same thing it did when it saved us from the crash.

Way to break it, hero.

___________

Agree, disagree? Am I spouting nonsense? Are you a fan of the garba-, I mean games, that get released on the iOS? Speak out, System Warriors.

Avatar image for StealthMonkey4
StealthMonkey4

7434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 StealthMonkey4
Member since 2009 • 7434 Posts

Th 3DS is the first part of Nintendo's descent. Nintendo going to crash and burn hard IMO, and Sony will go back to its rightful place in first with Microsoft in second. Nintendo just doesn't care about good games and making good systems anymore IMO, and it'll come back to them. I agree with you.

Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
First of all cursing doesn't help your argument any, it just makes you seem immature. There will always be money to be made from real gaming, and as long as the market for them exists so will traditional consoles and handhelds. Even if they take a back seat to the casual audience they will still remain.
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Handheld gaming got knocked the **** out by piracy. Lower sales = less developer interest. Simple and truthful fact. Apps are shallow, short, and total crap which is why they're sold for a dollar. It does not mean they're better in any way or form, but because it's cheap it sells. It's just like any other product in a market.

There's no damn buttons on a smartphone these days. They'll never overtake handheld gaming. Not to mention piracy is stupidly simple and rising on that platform as well.

*Looks at the topic title and TC*

OH****

Also your spacebar seems to be broken.

Avatar image for crippled_ram
crippled_ram

1583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 crippled_ram
Member since 2010 • 1583 Posts
The DL Legend lives on :lol: :P Anyway, i see one thing flawed in your hypothesis: smarphones, tablets and streaming devices will NEVER kill of dedicated console and handheld gaming, They might make the market smaller, but they won't kill it off. So if there's a crash, it'll be only for smartphones etc. And I'm okay with that, the sooner the fad is over, the better.
Avatar image for svetzenlether
svetzenlether

3082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 svetzenlether
Member since 2003 • 3082 Posts

We'll see.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Th 3DS is the first part of Nintendo's descent. Nintendo going to crash and burn hard IMO, and Sony will go back to its rightful place in first with Microsoft in second. Nintendo just doesn't care about good games and making good systems anymore IMO, and it'll come back to them. I agree with you.

StealthMonkey4

Says Nintendo doesn't seem to care about making good games or systems anymore, but;

-Microsoft is ditching their core audience and making Kinect titles, while Nintendo is pushing towards the core users more than ever with massive third party support. Nintendo has listened to their fans and created a great new control scheme to make up for the waggle-mote. Microsoft is ignoring users and pushing Kinect and casual software even harder.

Sony seems to be stuck trying to figure out what to do.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

*Looks at the topic title and TC*Also your spacebar seems to be broken.

ChubbyGuy40

Yeah, copy and paste never works out well, unfortunately. But why would you abandon my thread? That hurts, man. :(

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]*Looks at the topic title and TC*Also your spacebar seems to be broken.

DarkLink77

Yeah, copy and paste never works out well, unfortunately. But why would you abandon my thread? That hurts, man. :(

Because I've had that gif saved for awhile and needed to use it.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts
[QUOTE="crippled_ram"]The DL Legend lives on :lol: :P Anyway, i see one thing flawed in your hypothesis: smarphones, tablets and streaming devices will NEVER kill of dedicated console and handheld gaming, They might make the market smaller, but they won't kill it off. So if there's a crash, it'll be only for smartphones etc. And I'm okay with that, the sooner the fad is over, the better.

When companies can't make enough cash to sustain themselves, they'll either cut that line of production, or go down with it.
Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts
First of all cursing doesn't help your argument any, it just makes you seem immature. There will always be money to be made from real gaming, and as long as the market for them exists so will traditional consoles and handhelds. Even if they take a back seat to the casual audience they will still remain.meetroid8
Man, that's just the way I post. The logic itself is sound.
Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#13 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"]

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]*Looks at the topic title and TC*Also your spacebar seems to be broken.

ChubbyGuy40

Yeah, copy and paste never works out well, unfortunately. But why would you abandon my thread? That hurts, man. :(

Because I've had that gif saved for awhile and needed to use it.

Yeah, I may borrow it myself for future use. :P

Avatar image for crippled_ram
crippled_ram

1583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 crippled_ram
Member since 2010 • 1583 Posts
[QUOTE="crippled_ram"]The DL Legend lives on :lol: :P Anyway, i see one thing flawed in your hypothesis: smarphones, tablets and streaming devices will NEVER kill of dedicated console and handheld gaming, They might make the market smaller, but they won't kill it off. So if there's a crash, it'll be only for smartphones etc. And I'm okay with that, the sooner the fad is over, the better.DarkLink77
When companies can't make enough cash to sustain themselves, they'll either cut that line of production, or go down with it.

Sure, so the smaller indie creativity might be killed off, stifled and died. Fair enough. But the bigger publishers can sustain themselves on the consoles, can't they?
Avatar image for StealthMonkey4
StealthMonkey4

7434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 StealthMonkey4
Member since 2009 • 7434 Posts

[QUOTE="StealthMonkey4"]

Th 3DS is the first part of Nintendo's descent. Nintendo going to crash and burn hard IMO, and Sony will go back to its rightful place in first with Microsoft in second. Nintendo just doesn't care about good games and making good systems anymore IMO, and it'll come back to them. I agree with you.

ChubbyGuy40

Says Nintendo doesn't seem to care about making good games or systems anymore, but;

-Microsoft is ditching their core audience and making Kinect titles, while Nintendo is pushing towards the core users more than ever with massive third party support. Nintendo has listened to their fans and created a great new control scheme to make up for the waggle-mote. Microsoft is ignoring users and pushing Kinect and casual software even harder.

Sony seems to be stuck trying to figure out what to do.

Microsoft isn't really either, however the 360 has much better games than the Wii does.

I'm not sure what you mean by the last part, Sony is still pumping out new games and has the Move controller but isn't pushing it like Nintendo and MS.

Avatar image for The_Capitalist
The_Capitalist

10838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#16 The_Capitalist
Member since 2004 • 10838 Posts

Your theory is flawed. The gaming industry today is far more diversified and much less niche than it was in the 1980s. In the 1980s, video games were primarily marketed at children. Today, the audience is far more vast, and even if Nintendo drags itself down, it means that fewer companies will have to fight over the shrinking pie.

Nintendo will struggle in the years to come, but gaming is more alive than ever. Even if it might move into a different direction.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

Your theory is flawed. The gaming industry today is far more diversified and much less niche than it was in the 1980s. In the 1980s, video games were primarily marketed at children. Today, the audience is far more vast, and even if Nintendo drags itself down, it means that fewer companies will have to fight over the shrinking pie.

Nintendo will struggle in the years to come, but gaming is more alive than ever. Even if it might move into a different direction.

The_Capitalist
More and more companies are jumping in. And the market in the 80s was booming. That's why so many companies jumped in on it.
Avatar image for MetallicaKings
MetallicaKings

4781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 MetallicaKings
Member since 2004 • 4781 Posts
There are so many more gamers these days. 65% of households play video games: http://www.grabstats.com/statmain.asp?StatID=741 Over four times the amount of gamers in the early 90's. Look at this graph here also: http://vgsales.wikia.com/wiki/Video_game_industry There wont be another drop.
Avatar image for N7v1K0
N7v1K0

5755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 N7v1K0
Member since 2009 • 5755 Posts
I agree about handhelds, but I don't think consoles will be pushed away so easily... But even if they do... there's always PC :P
Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts
[QUOTE="MetallicaKings"]There are so many more gamers these days. 65% of households play video games: http://www.grabstats.com/statmain.asp?StatID=741 Over four times the amount of gamers in the early 90's. Look at this graph here also: http://vgsales.wikia.com/wiki/Video_game_industry There wont be another drop.

Just because a market is larger and doing well now doesn't mean it's immune to doing poorly in the future. See the housing bubble in the U.S., etc.
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#21 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts
This is true... I mean, Nintendo did directly make way for the floodgates that have led to a glut of garbage cheap content on iOS. I mean, publishers expect to have big returns on small investments, consumers expect cheaper games, and as these devices (smartphones and tablets) become more and more dominant (which seems increasingly likely by the day), we will be heading towards a glut. So... yeah, Nintendo might just have caused the Great Gaming Crash of 2013. It might not lead to an absolute end of gaming- PC gaming will survive- but consoles, and especially handhelds, as we know them, might be on their way out.
Avatar image for MarcRecon
MarcRecon

8191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 4

#22 MarcRecon
Member since 2009 • 8191 Posts

It's a business dude...try running one and I'm pretty sure your perspective will change.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#23 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

It's a business dude...try running one and I'm pretty sure your perspective will change.

MarcRecon

Since I'm pretty sure no one here runs a video game company, I think I'm as qualified to speculate on the future as anyone else.

Avatar image for Famiking
Famiking

4879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Famiking
Member since 2009 • 4879 Posts
This is assuming smartphones will take over the market, which will not happen outside a Apple fanboy's dreams.
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#25 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts
This is assuming smartphones will take over the market, which will not happen outside a Apple fanboy's dreams.Famiking
DarkLink isn't an Apple fanboy though...
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
Agreed. Luckily for us BioWare and Naughty Dog are saving it with the superior cinematic experiences that ME2 and UC2 are.
Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#27 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts
Agreed. Luckily for us BioWare and Naughty Dog are saving it with the superior cinematic experiences that ME2 and UC2 are.IronBass
The times, they are a-changing, IB. Cinematic isn't the new hotness anymore. Casual is.
Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

Pc gaming will always be a safe bastion, it survived the first crash with nary a scratch.

Avatar image for AvatarMan96
AvatarMan96

7324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 2

#29 AvatarMan96
Member since 2010 • 7324 Posts

Is it really necessary to curse so many times? :?

Avatar image for Famiking
Famiking

4879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Famiking
Member since 2009 • 4879 Posts
[QUOTE="charizard1605"] DarkLink isn't an Apple fanboy though...

I didn't say he was one. In fact, I'm under the assumption he doesn't own a smartphone. If he did own a smartphone, he would realize that no one is going to actually rely on smartphones for profit, since most smartphone games barely make revenue. It is free games that dominate the smartphone software market, not $1 games. And tablets are barely even portable.
Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#31 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

Is it really necessary to curse so many times? :?

AvatarMan96

Yes. Because it was a long post. But I toned it down a bit. Just for you. :)

Avatar image for Filthybastrd
Filthybastrd

7124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Filthybastrd
Member since 2009 • 7124 Posts

I believe that it's MS who will murder the gaming industry.

They'll keep advertising, promoting Kinect and feeding us with more timed CoD exclusives till every last one of us, is so cynical that we'd rather watch the grass grow.

Avatar image for TrapJak
TrapJak

2933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 TrapJak
Member since 2011 • 2933 Posts

Agreed. Luckily for us BioWare and Naughty Dog are saving it with the superior cinematic experiences that ME2 and UC2 are.IronBass
Brofist?

And I do agree, Nintendo spent too much time reeling in the casuals. They aren't a bad company, but they need to focus on the TRU FAX.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#34 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts
[QUOTE="Famiking"][QUOTE="charizard1605"] DarkLink isn't an Apple fanboy though...

I didn't say he was one. In fact, I'm under the assumption he doesn't own a smartphone. If he did own a smartphone, he would realize that no one is going to actually rely on smartphones for profit, since most smartphone games barely make revenue. It is free games that dominate the smartphone software market, not $1 games. And tablets are barely even portable.

There are free to play games, and they seem to be getting increasingly popular.
Avatar image for TrapJak
TrapJak

2933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 TrapJak
Member since 2011 • 2933 Posts

[QUOTE="IronBass"]Agreed. Luckily for us BioWare and Naughty Dog are saving it with the superior cinematic experiences that ME2 and UC2 are.DarkLink77
The times, they are a-changing, IB. Cinematic isn't the new hotness anymore. Casual is.

So who's heading in the wrong diretion so far, MS or Nintendo?

Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
[QUOTE="IronBass"]Agreed. Luckily for us BioWare and Naughty Dog are saving it with the superior cinematic experiences that ME2 and UC2 are.DarkLink77
The times, they are a-changing, IB. Cinematic isn't the new hotness anymore. Casual is.

Then why did ME2 and UC2 make such a good profit?
Avatar image for StealthMonkey4
StealthMonkey4

7434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#37 StealthMonkey4
Member since 2009 • 7434 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="IronBass"]Agreed. Luckily for us BioWare and Naughty Dog are saving it with the superior cinematic experiences that ME2 and UC2 are.TrapJak

The times, they are a-changing, IB. Cinematic isn't the new hotness anymore. Casual is.

So who's heading in the wrong diretion so far, MS or Nintendo?

Both, but Nintendo is more. The only company still heading in the right direction is Sony.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#38 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts
[QUOTE="Famiking"][QUOTE="charizard1605"] DarkLink isn't an Apple fanboy though...

I didn't say he was one. In fact, I'm under the assumption he doesn't own a smartphone. If he did own a smartphone, he would realize that no one is going to actually rely on smartphones for profit, since most smartphone games barely make revenue. It is free games that dominate the smartphone software market, not $1 games. And tablets are barely even portable.

EA's making a ton of cash on that market, as are indie developers.
Avatar image for D1zzyCriminal
D1zzyCriminal

1839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 D1zzyCriminal
Member since 2009 • 1839 Posts

Nintendo have popularised the game console NOT the video game.

People always played games, but Nintendo have found a way of getting people to play more games and integrate it into their lives.

People have always played snake on their phone, or tetris on a browser, or DDR in the arcade. The difference is the way the games are being accessed.

Tablets, smartphones and streaming media is not Nintendo's fault, yes they will take emphasis off the traditional games console. but no it wont kill traditional games.

As long as the market for core games (us) is here there will be a games industry. Nintendo only tapped into what other companies have been trying to crack for years, causing a sudden mainstream popularisation of video games.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#40 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts
[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="IronBass"]Agreed. Luckily for us BioWare and Naughty Dog are saving it with the superior cinematic experiences that ME2 and UC2 are.meetroid8
The times, they are a-changing, IB. Cinematic isn't the new hotness anymore. Casual is.

Then why did ME2 and UC2 make such a good profit?

Because the change over isn't complete yet?
Avatar image for TrapJak
TrapJak

2933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 TrapJak
Member since 2011 • 2933 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="IronBass"]Agreed. Luckily for us BioWare and Naughty Dog are saving it with the superior cinematic experiences that ME2 and UC2 are.meetroid8
The times, they are a-changing, IB. Cinematic isn't the new hotness anymore. Casual is.

Then why did ME2 and UC2 make such a good profit?

The industry is getting MORE casual, two cintematic games arent going to change that.

Avatar image for darth-pyschosis
darth-pyschosis

9322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 darth-pyschosis
Member since 2006 • 9322 Posts
So why do you have to be so selfish and dislike games being made for everyone? You realise the video game industry is entirely different then when Atari was on top? The fact that any poster agreed with you, let alone the second one, concerns me more for the state of gaming. Sony and Microsoft have always made games for everyone. People even make games for the frat boy shooter fan/middle aged military nut/gun nut in COD. Games are for everybody, and each game has something other people will like, and other things that other people will dislike. Didn't anyone's momma teach them that sharing is good?
Avatar image for Willy105
Willy105

26211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#43 Willy105  Online
Member since 2005 • 26211 Posts
Great analysis, but it's obvious you placed the blame on Apple, not Nintendo.
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
The times, they are a-changing, IB. Cinematic isn't the new hotness anymore. Casual is.DarkLink77
Apple dominance next gen confirmed?
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#45 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="IronBass"]Agreed. Luckily for us BioWare and Naughty Dog are saving it with the superior cinematic experiences that ME2 and UC2 are.meetroid8
The times, they are a-changing, IB. Cinematic isn't the new hotness anymore. Casual is.

Then why did ME2 and UC2 make such a good profit?

Not as much as an Angry Birds or a Doodle Jump though.
Heck, not even as much as Farmville.
In fact, Zynga is one of the highest valued game companies right now.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#46 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

Great analysis, but it's obvious you placed the blame on Apple, not Nintendo. Willy105

Nintendo kick-started the ball. Apple just picked it up and ran with it. Ninty is the root cause.

Avatar image for Famiking
Famiking

4879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Famiking
Member since 2009 • 4879 Posts
[QUOTE="charizard1605"] There are free to play games, and they seem to be getting increasingly popular.

But they don't make much revenue on smartphones. The thing is this: 1. Only a segment of the smartphone market actually plays games on their smartphone. 2. Only a segment of that market actually buy their games on that platform. 3. Only a segment of that market actually only uses their smartphone as their sole gaming device. 4. Only a segment of that market would buy a game that costs more than $5 There are so many problems with this business model, it only attracts a few gamers and a few types of games.
Avatar image for Willy105
Willy105

26211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#48 Willy105  Online
Member since 2005 • 26211 Posts

[QUOTE="TrapJak"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] The times, they are a-changing, IB. Cinematic isn't the new hotness anymore. Casual is.StealthMonkey4

So who's heading in the wrong diretion so far, MS or Nintendo?

Both, but Nintendo is more. The only company still heading in the right direction is Sony.

I can't find this Wrong direction on my compass. In fact, I don't even know why I have a compass. And Sony doesn't seem to be going in the Right direction. The PS3 is just sitting there on the floor. But I guess if I take it to Florida, it would be moving South.
Avatar image for StealthMonkey4
StealthMonkey4

7434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#49 StealthMonkey4
Member since 2009 • 7434 Posts

[QUOTE="StealthMonkey4"]

[QUOTE="TrapJak"]So who's heading in the wrong diretion so far, MS or Nintendo?

Willy105

Both, but Nintendo is more. The only company still heading in the right direction is Sony.

I can't find this Wrong direction on my compass. In fact, I don't even know why I have a compass. And Sony doesn't seem to be going in the Right direction. The PS3 is just sitting there on the floor. But I guess if I take it to Florida, it would be moving South.

Erm... you're taking things a little too literally. And just because you don't play your amazing system that is the PS3 doesn't mean it's going in the wrong direction.

Avatar image for TrapJak
TrapJak

2933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 TrapJak
Member since 2011 • 2933 Posts

So why do you have to be so selfish and dislike games being made for everyone? You realise the video game industry is entirely different then when Atari was on top? The fact that any poster agreed with you, let alone the second one, concerns me more for the state of gaming. Sony and Microsoft have always made games for everyone. People even make games for the frat boy shooter fan/middle aged military nut/gun nut in COD. Games are for everybody, and each game has something other people will like, and other things that other people will dislike. Didn't anyone's momma teach them that sharing is good?darth-pyschosis
Sharing is good, when its done well.

For Nintendo fans, it seems the causals are getting the Oreos, and the hardcores are getting Raisinets. Though that one Raisinet stands tall.