lol so trueLem reaction, while cows cackle with glee behind them.
And it must be done:
(Cue the Halo Theme)
FlooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOp! FlooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOp!
TheGrat1
This topic is locked from further discussion.
lol so trueLem reaction, while cows cackle with glee behind them.
And it must be done:
(Cue the Halo Theme)
FlooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOp! FlooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOp!
TheGrat1
6.5 is an unfortunate score. But I am still going to be using gamerankings at the end of the year as well , so all is not lost lemmings. It's just one opinion of many. I would however advise you to think about what it is you are actually buying. Nobody is going to take away your "halo" street cred or you won't be belittled if you don't follow the crowd. Do what you want to do , play what you want to play.
[QUOTE="Arsuz"]I'm very surprised by this score, and I don't understand the people that say they expected this. We're not talking about just some developer, we're talking about Ensemble studios, god rest their soul. I was expecting this game to get at least an 8. Haven't seen any movies or anything, just basing it off on developer pedigree, an 8 seems like a justified score. It's a shame that Ensemble can't go out with a bang.
PS: This is SW so: :lol: @ X360 fans hyping this as a good rts :lol:
Puckhog04
Still have their great PC RTS title. :) Age of Empires series.
But, yea, it's a shame they couldn't go out with a truly epic game like the Age of Empires games were to alot of us gamers. I really can't say i'm surprised at the score though. I hated the demo. I think it's ironic. FEAR2 demo got literally destroyed here at the forums when it came out and scored an 8.5? (don't remember the number specifically) Then the Halo Wars demo comes out and gets nothing but praise mostly and it flops as bad as this. I mean, there were lemmings comparing this to Empire at War...honestly...
FEAR 2 flopped. It got a 7.[QUOTE="danish-death"] If Killzone 2 score 9.0+, I wont be near SW in a month lol. Cows will be all over the place.glez13
But if it scores 8.5- this will become FLOPZONE and Lemmings will be all over the place.:o
i've already got my damage control ready: "Meh, RE5 looks better anyway"
good, or should i make it a sony exclusive like inFamous? :D
Just for perspective, 82 @ metacritic.
:?
While I thank GS for giving it a score based on the genre (and compared to the PC) it does surprise me the score ... but at least it didn't get a 9.0 and we have to put up with people who have never played a PC RTS insisting its better than game X because it scored higher.[QUOTE="Mehdi1984"][QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"] That doesn't change the point that they were highly praised RTS games with only two factions :| Fine, want a more recent one? Pick a Command and Conquer game that has two factions. There's been some recently, like Red Alert 2.Skittles_McGeeRed Alert 2 2000..... that's 9 years agoNitpick much?
Who's the one nitpicking here? Standards and expectations become greater as time passes by. If you have to go back 10 to 15 years or so to find comparable games then that really doesn't speak for your argument.
Just for perspective, 82 @ metacritic.
:?
Yeah kinda strange how GS underscored it. Not to mention that one of their reasons is that it's too simple? I thought it was meant to be simple.Halo Fanboy:
"Please God, let Killzone 2 flop on Gamespot."
You have to admit with this review... one way or another the KZ2 review will be epic in sw.
Just for perspective, 82 @ metacritic.
:?
Anyone else in favour of a mandatory breathalyser test before GS reviewers write their reviews?[QUOTE="musicalmac"]While I thank GS for giving it a score based on the genre (and compared to the PC) it does surprise me the score ... but at least it didn't get a 9.0 and we have to put up with people who have never played a PC RTS insisting its better than game X because it scored higher.Just for perspective, 82 @ metacritic.
:?
blue_hazy_basic
So you should compare games to other platforms now? So you are saying the GS should compare PSP action games to say PS3 action games because they are the same genre?
[QUOTE="musicalmac"]While I thank GS for giving it a score based on the genre (and compared to the PC) it does surprise me the score ... but at least it didn't get a 9.0 and we have to put up with people who have never played a PC RTS insisting its better than game X because it scored higher.Just for perspective, 82 @ metacritic.
:?
blue_hazy_basic
You are right, at least we wont have noob and professional fanboy lemmings saying crazy stuff like that.
[QUOTE="Puckhog04"][QUOTE="Arsuz"]I'm very surprised by this score, and I don't understand the people that say they expected this. We're not talking about just some developer, we're talking about Ensemble studios, god rest their soul. I was expecting this game to get at least an 8. Haven't seen any movies or anything, just basing it off on developer pedigree, an 8 seems like a justified score. It's a shame that Ensemble can't go out with a bang.
PS: This is SW so: :lol: @ X360 fans hyping this as a good rts :lol:
M337ING
Still have their great PC RTS title. :) Age of Empires series.
But, yea, it's a shame they couldn't go out with a truly epic game like the Age of Empires games were to alot of us gamers. I really can't say i'm surprised at the score though. I hated the demo. I think it's ironic. FEAR2 demo got literally destroyed here at the forums when it came out and scored an 8.5? (don't remember the number specifically) Then the Halo Wars demo comes out and gets nothing but praise mostly and it flops as bad as this. I mean, there were lemmings comparing this to Empire Total War...honestly...
FEAR 2 flopped. It got a 7.Yea i just realized that, got the IGN review confused with Gamespot. Etiher way, FEAR2 was demolished when it came to the demo and Halo Wars was praised. Still somewhat ironic considering the scores. I still think it's rather funny that HW was being compared to Empire Total War. But, yea, got the reviews confused.
Just for perspective, 82 @ metacritic.
:?
While I thank GS for giving it a score based on the genre (and compared to the PC) it does surprise me the score ... but at least it didn't get a 9.0 and we have to put up with people who have never played a PC RTS insisting its better than game X because it scored higher. Well shooters aren't compared to their PC counterparts (or history) so why should RTS'?Just for perspective, 82 @ metacritic.
:?
While I thank GS for giving it a score based on the genre (and compared to the PC) it does surprise me the score ... but at least it didn't get a 9.0 and we have to put up with people who have never played a PC RTS insisting its better than game X because it scored higher.So you should compare games to other platforms now? So you are saying the GS should compare PSP action games to say PS3 action games because they are the same genre?
and lemmings and cows don't constantly compare their games and mulitplats to the PC?!? :? (Look at the GTA scores and reaction for example)[QUOTE="musicalmac"]Anyone else in favour of a mandatory breathalyser test before GS reviewers write their reviews?Just for perspective, 82 @ metacritic.
:?
marklarmer
No more or less then the 7 sites that gave it a 9+ score.
Ouch. That's gonna leave a mark.
That said, I'm still really looking forward to this. I'm not a hardcore RTS fan, so a casualized RTS sounds great to me. Of course, the other game I'm looking forward to is Killzone 2 - figure that one out.
lowe0
That makes two of us. I enjoyed the demo on both games and will still get both regardless of the score. I've enjoyed flops before on all consoles, so sue me.
Just for perspective, 82 @ metacritic.
:?
While I thank GS for giving it a score based on the genre (and compared to the PC) it does surprise me the score ... but at least it didn't get a 9.0 and we have to put up with people who have never played a PC RTS insisting its better than game X because it scored higher. Well shooters aren't compared to their PC counterparts (or history) so why should RTS'? How many endless threads have we had comparing x on a console to y on a PC?I can't believe a Killzone game is going to outscore a Halo game. If anyone had said that 4 years ago, they would be laughed at. This is assuming Kilzone 2 scores more than 6.5, of course.Floppy_Jim
No Floppy_Jim you know better than anyone that
9.0+ = KILLZOWNED
8.5- = FLOPZONE
[QUOTE="glez13"][QUOTE="danish-death"] If Killzone 2 score 9.0+, I wont be near SW in a month lol. Cows will be all over the place.Mr_Apple_Soup
But if it scores 8.5- this will become FLOPZONE and Lemmings will be all over the place.:o
i've already got my damage control ready: "Meh, RE5 looks better anyway"
good, or should i make it a sony exclusive like inFamous? :D
If inFamous flops, and there's a chance it will, you end up with a serious backfire. RE5 is also multiplat, so it's not much use to fall back on that when pretty much anyone can play it. Best thing to do is claim bias/lack of integrity/etc. now, that way you can qoute yourself later when people question you.
So here goes: I can't belive this review! They are below the metacetric score by like 2 points! Everyone else is claiming this is a good/great game except Gamespot. Do Gamespot consider themselved to have higher standards? Then why did AC get a 9?! Can't answer that? Thought so! This just goes to show how far GS has fallen over the past few years. They have no integrity left at all!
[QUOTE="spinecaton"][QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"] While I thank GS for giving it a score based on the genre (and compared to the PC) it does surprise me the score ... but at least it didn't get a 9.0 and we have to put up with people who have never played a PC RTS insisting its better than game X because it scored higher.blue_hazy_basic
So you should compare games to other platforms now? So you are saying the GS should compare PSP action games to say PS3 action games because they are the same genre?
and lemmings and cows don't constantly compare their games and mulitplats to the PC?!? :? (Look at the GTA scores and reaction for example)...maybe if Halo Wars was also on the PC you would have a valid claim...
It was written by someone for GS UK. Will someone else review for GS US like IGN does?CuDDKiDDNot unless GS have started a new thing without telling anyone.
Look at the damage control at N4G
Fontaine - 1 hour ago
[QUOTE="CannedWorms"]LAWL, the GameSpot review was submitted to N4G, the users are going crazy :lol:.blue_hazy_basicSome of my favourite quotes from N4G: "1.1 - Wow, looks like Gamespot has been trying to be objective. Or they are MAD that MS stopped sending them money because of recession. Sony couldn't have send them the money. They didn't even Send them a copy of Killzone 2. " "17.3 - NO ONE CARES ABOUT GAMESPOT OR EDGE MAGAZINE. Gametrailers, IGN (U.S., AU, and UK), 1UP, and Cheat CC, are the only real source's for games news, info, and reviews. They all scored K2 VERY well. (9+ scores) Stay away from Gamespot, G4/X-play, Edge, and Game Informer....because they are biased on ALL games. " Against ALL games??? :?I lol'd like mad at the first one :D
[QUOTE="Zero5000X"]where does it say that in the ToU?Saber-Lily
Not the ToU, but the official System Wars Rules:
There is currently some disagreement on a game being considered a "true flop", and growing debate over what review scores "count" for that flop. The official policies of System Wars currently dictate that only GameSpot scores count, however other sites are often used to attempt to predict GameSpot's review scores.
Taken from: System Wars Rules: READ BEFORE POSTING (UPDATED 1/23/09)
It's a sticky. On the first page.
How come I can't find said text in your link? :?
It was written by someone for GS UK. Will someone else review for GS US like IGN does?CuDDKiDD
No, unlike IGN, GS fires majority of their reviewers and that is why some reviews take forever to come out.
So you should compare games to other platforms now? So you are saying the GS should compare PSP action games to say PS3 action games because they are the same genre?
and lemmings and cows don't constantly compare their games and mulitplats to the PC?!? :? (Look at the GTA scores and reaction for example)...maybe if Halo Wars was also on the PC you would have a valid claim...
What difference does that make? You are directly comparing halo wars to others in the genre, no? I'm not saying that I expect an RTS to be of the same standard on a console to a PC (If you look I said I was surprised GS scored so low). What I am saying is that you would get consolites saying they were if Halo Wars had scored highly.so, its been a while sense this has happened sooooo....PHOTODOCUMENTARY!!!
lemmings:
cows:
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g80/rrproductions/neverest.jpg
and lets not forget us hermits
sheep, well.....
i think this about sums up the atmosphere of system wars for the next few days
How many endless threads have we had comparing x on a console to y on a PC?blue_hazy_basic? dunno... PC has 90% of the times the upperhand in the shooter department. Unless the game is a bad port or poorly optimized. So it's kind of silly to make such comparisons. imo
It was written by someone for GS UK. Will someone else review for GS US like IGN does?CuDDKiDD
No. They share the staff. Having 3 diffrent critics reviewing the same game is an unnesescary waste of resources, I don't understand why IGN do. A second opinion might be requested on some sites, but 3 diffrent reviews? I don't understand that. The GeoW 2 one is a UK review for example.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment