PC gamers:U$299 PC vs Xbox One / $198 PC vs past gen console

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#151 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

@lostrib said:

@farrell2k said:

@MonsieurX said:

@farrell2k said:

@MonsieurX said:

I don't get the point of such poor-man's builds. They are severely limited and will probably not last long.

Might as well shell out some more and save in the long run.

Nothing wrong with buying an inexpensive PC that will outperform a specific console. You don't have to play the same games that the console plays, and the system isn't going to get weaker over time.

Seriously, I would never recommend such a build.

Yes it is possible to build a machine(without the OS) for 300$,is it any good? Nope.

Why do you need to buy an OS? You can't play one of the hundreds of free games on Linux, or can't just call up Microsoft to transfer your windows license to the new PC like people do every day? If a console is considered good, how can a pc that outperforms a console be bad?

Because not everyone has a Windows license to transfer...

Especially if they are jumping into PC gaming for the first time.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#152 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

The 260x is basically a overclocked 7790, the 128bit bus limits what the gpu can do at higher resolutions. so its not really any better then the X1's gpu. And to the fact its only 1gb hurts it when games will use 2 or more gigabytes of memory for buffer. Also diablotek psu's suck and are almost guaranteed to fail within a few years of use. Ive seen three used and all three died within two years. You can find better case+psu combos like from thermaltake or coolermaster for double of what pos is worth.

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

@leandrro said:

@Cranler said:

@leandrro said:

@Cranler said:

@lostrib said:

@farrell2k said:

@lostrib said:

But it's up to the TC to prove it's true...

Or are you saying that since Cranler can't prove it false, it's true?

That is also an argument from ignorance, and no. Did you two just purposely not read the sites with benchmarks that he linked in his original post???

you mean the ones for BF4 which this $299 PC can't play?

That R260 BF 4 bench is with the 2gb version using an I7-3770k at 4.3GHz. The build in this thread is a 1gb gpu lol.

r7 260x 1gb >>> x1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiijsQJRPmM

A video with no frame counter proves what?

proves that i am part of a big youtube conspiracy of fake benchmarks?

What benchmark? It was a guy playing at 1080p medium with very choppy gameplay, it got a lot smoother when he switched to all low settings.

That card will choke on next gen only multiplats.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#155 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

@04dcarraher said:

The 260x is basically a overclocked 7790, the 128bit bus limits what the gpu can do at higher resolutions. so its not really any better then the X1's gpu. And to the fact its only 1gb hurts it when games will use 2 or more gigabytes of memory for buffer. Also diablotek psu's suck and are almost guaranteed to fail within a few years of use. Ive seen three used and all three died within two years. You can find better case+psu combos like from thermaltake or coolermaster for double of what pos is worth.

Don't let TC see that, he loves those PSU's.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#156 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@clyde46 said:

@lostrib said:

@farrell2k said:

@MonsieurX said:

Seriously, I would never recommend such a build.

Yes it is possible to build a machine(without the OS) for 300$,is it any good? Nope.

Why do you need to buy an OS? You can't play one of the hundreds of free games on Linux, or can't just call up Microsoft to transfer your windows license to the new PC like people do every day? If a console is considered good, how can a pc that outperforms a console be bad?

Because not everyone has a Windows license to transfer...

Especially if they are jumping into PC gaming for the first time.

In which case, to even install a windows license on this build, you'd need another PC to create a bootable USB or add the cost of an optical drive

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#158  Edited By lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@farrell2k said:

@lostrib said:

@farrell2k said:

Why do you need to buy an OS? You can't play one of the hundreds of free games on Linux, or can't just call up Microsoft to transfer your windows license to the new PC like people do every day? If a console is considered good, how can a pc that outperforms a console be bad?

Because not everyone has a Windows license to transfer...

And not everyone needs to game on windows for their $300 pc to be more powerful than the XB1. Why is this shit so hard to understand?

because if your benchmarks for the PC is going to be BF4, then the PC should probably be able to play BF4

Avatar image for leandrro
leandrro

1644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -2

User Lists: 0

#159  Edited By leandrro
Member since 2007 • 1644 Posts

@clyde46 said:
@leandrro said:

@clyde46 said:
@farrell2k said:

@clyde46 said:

@leandrro: It seems you don't understand PSU's.

What the **** doesn't he understand? He posted the card's max watt usage. Do you understand that minimum recommendations for power supplies are RECOMMENDATIONS for average system builds when using that card? Is it so hard to comprehend the words average and recommendation? Every manufacturer will tell you the max watt usage of their devices. All you have to do is add them up! Did you stop believing in math or something?

Do you really just go on what the manufactures say? Are you going to ignore thousands of seasoned PC builders telling you to avoid PSU's like this one? There is a reason its so cheap.... its not built to provide that power output and the parts inside will certainly not be industry standard.

you need a certified PSU for 300 400 or 500W build, but you dont need to avoid cheap PSUs for a 180W build, saying that you cant use a cheap 250W PSU in a 180W PC is like saying that 90% of worlds PCs should be shut off because they will soon explode, because most of them are using cheap 250W PSUs in 180W configurations

You just don't get it do you.

Sure enough, after a few minutes of test one, we got an electrical zzzt sound and the unit was dead. At 184 watts, it died. Seems a long way from 650 watts, doesn't it? We didn't even get a chance at using the scope on this one, it went out that soon.

http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&op=Story&reid=71

A 650W rated PSU that died failing to provide less than 200W... Let me say that again to reenforce the point. It died failing to provide less than 50% of what its rated at.... Now you say that the world is running on sub-par PSU's which is true i'll give you that but those people are not putting in dedicated video cards, they aren't pushing those PSU's at all. Lets look at what the inside of the 650W PSU looked like.

Do you really think that stuff is going to made of good quality materials? Do you think that cooling is suitable?

Lets get to the point here, this build you cooked up is nothing but a deathtrap. It fails to meet current game standards and it certainly won't be playing anything that comes out in 2015. If you have saved $300 for something to play games on, play a 3DS and a stack of games rather then this POS.

yes, they are all fake Wattage PSUs, their are 200W projects labeled 500W 600W 700W

what they do it deliver 200W or 195 or 190, to my 179W build

but if youre so crazy about PSU, get a $20 350W 80 plus certified PSU from Corsair or something like that, but only due to paranoia, ive replaced hundreds of PSUs, they all die after 5 6 years being used 12 hours a day in dirty unventilated cases with 150W old builds running heavy aplications on 80% CPU usage

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#160 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

@farrell2k said:

@clyde46 said:

You just don't get it do you.

Sure enough, after a few minutes of test one, we got an electrical zzzt sound and the unit was dead. At 184 watts, it died. Seems a long way from 650 watts, doesn't it? We didn't even get a chance at using the scope on this one, it went out that soon.

http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&op=Story&reid=71

A 650W rated PSU that died failing to provide less than 200W... Let me say that again to reenforce the point. It died failing to provide less than 50% of what its rated at.... Now you say that the world is running on sub-par PSU's which is true i'll give you that but those people are not putting in dedicated video cards, they aren't pushing those PSU's at all. Lets look at what the inside of the 650W PSU looked like.

Do you really think that stuff is going to made of good quality materials? Do you think that cooling is suitable?

Lets get to the point here, this build you cooked up is nothing but a deathtrap. It fails to meet current game standards and it certainly won't be playing anything that comes out in 2015. If you have saved $300 for something to play games on, play a 3DS and a stack of games rather then this POS.

So now the argument has gone from "it won't work with that power supply. It's too weak" to "That psu is powerful enough, but it's not a brand name I like therefore it is more prone to failure, despite not on bit of statistical evidence to back it up". That's called MOVING THE GOALPOST.

I never said it wouldn't work, I'm talking about poor quailty that PSU is. I showed you a PSU that is bargain basement and is rated to more than what the TC used and it failed to produce less than half of what it was supposed to. I used that to highlight the danger of using cheap PSU's. You seem hellbent on showing that you can create a PC that rivials consoles for under $300. To that end, no. You can't create a PC that costs less than $300 and still have to compete with consoles. I also find it amusing that TC is using a BF4 benchmark to try and prove his point when his build in the OP doesn't even have Windows included. BF4 does not run natively under Linux and no amount of fucking around with WINE is going to make it run like it would under Windows. Does he expect owners to pirate it?

Avatar image for leandrro
leandrro

1644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -2

User Lists: 0

#161 leandrro
Member since 2007 • 1644 Posts

@lostrib said:

@leandrro said:

@lostrib said:

@farrell2k said:

@lostrib said:

But it's up to the TC to prove it's true...

Or are you saying that since Cranler can't prove it false, it's true?

That is also an argument from ignorance, and no. Did you two just purposely not read the sites with benchmarks that he linked in his original post???

you mean the ones for BF4 which this $299 PC can't play?

oh yeah...sure....

Loading Video...

which your $299 build can't play

sure...

Loading Video...

Avatar image for CrownKingArthur
CrownKingArthur

5262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 CrownKingArthur
Member since 2013 • 5262 Posts

if someone had a strategy of spending $300 initially to get a working pc, but then x amount of time later spend more money, i'd support something like that. i'd do something like this:

imagine if the discrete gpu and 2x 2gb RAM's were taken out of this build, reinvest that money into 1x 4gb ram, larger hard disc, a better case/psu, maybe pay the price different to get on the h97 chipset, and for the OS run with a windows 7 30 day trial.

then later on there's room on that mobo for another 4gb ram, so it can get to 8gb system memory - which i think is the minimum place to be. then, if later on with a gpu upgrade, then a cpu upgrade (the first thing one would 'buy twice'), and of course save money for a windows license - but basically its a way of spreading the cost of the entire build over several paychecks while getting the use of a pc, and only buying one part semi-twice - the CPU.

i mean, down the track what's ~$80 cost as a standalone upgrade for an SSD to use as a cache with intel rst, and get about 3-5x performance increase with frequently accessed information? if this was part of the strategy from the get go, it will slot into the system with no hassles.

of course this is just one strategy as a suggested alternate to a super budget build, and of course this alternate has caveats. what if a person started out, then their financial situation changed? they need cash but its tied up in a computer thats not yet optimum. but you know this is a strategy to minimise the economic impact of a more premium pc experience, so there's gonna be compromises.

just my two cents, seriously leandrro i'm actually pretty impressed with how cheap something could be assembled which would POST and handle an OS install.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163  Edited By tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
@leandrro said:

i have the same card as you but my $600 PC cost me only $400

R7260x needs 500W PSU LOL, you know Sh*** about PSUs do you?

do you even know what is TDP? what is a 12v rail?

this build need 115W for GPU and 54W for CPU + ABOUT 20W for the rest = 179W youre safe with a $10 250W PSU, 400W PSU is a big waste

I don't think you own a PC i think you are a die hard troll.

And the R9270 you used last time needs a 500watts PSU i know i have that same card.oh did i mention i didn't buy an HDD with my PC or even a case fan.? Which your case doesn't have either.?

20 watts for the rest..hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

You build like a moron and i already prove that,so once again what will be next time.? Mounting the components on a piece or plastic because you don't need a case.?

Hahahaha...

@farrell2k said:

What the hell doesn't he understand? He posted the card's max watt usage. Do you understand that minimum recommendations for power supplies are RECOMMENDATIONS for average system builds when using that card? Is it so hard to comprehend the words average and recommendation? Every manufacturer will tell you the max watt usage of their devices. All you have to do is add them up! Did you stop believing in math or something?

I could care less what you and the other sad troll say,this the cardboard box my R9 270 came with,this are the requirements on the back and it clearly say freaking 500 watts or greater,and for Crossfire 600watts or greater,now who should i take as valid you or the damn card manufacturer.?

He used the same sh** PSU on another system already but pair with this ^^ same GPU,and i told him so and many people told him so the PSU was sh**,the only moron who doesn't know anything about PSU is you and him,which i really think now are the same loser.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#164 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

@leandrro said:

@lostrib said:

@leandrro said:

@lostrib said:

@farrell2k said:

@lostrib said:

But it's up to the TC to prove it's true...

Or are you saying that since Cranler can't prove it false, it's true?

That is also an argument from ignorance, and no. Did you two just purposely not read the sites with benchmarks that he linked in his original post???

you mean the ones for BF4 which this $299 PC can't play?

oh yeah...sure....

Loading Video...

which your $299 build can't play

sure...

Loading Video...

So you are going to add another $100 for Windows now?

Avatar image for leandrro
leandrro

1644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -2

User Lists: 0

#166 leandrro
Member since 2007 • 1644 Posts

@clyde46 said:

@farrell2k said:

@clyde46 said:

You just don't get it do you.

Sure enough, after a few minutes of test one, we got an electrical zzzt sound and the unit was dead. At 184 watts, it died. Seems a long way from 650 watts, doesn't it? We didn't even get a chance at using the scope on this one, it went out that soon.

http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&op=Story&reid=71

A 650W rated PSU that died failing to provide less than 200W... Let me say that again to reenforce the point. It died failing to provide less than 50% of what its rated at.... Now you say that the world is running on sub-par PSU's which is true i'll give you that but those people are not putting in dedicated video cards, they aren't pushing those PSU's at all. Lets look at what the inside of the 650W PSU looked like.

Do you really think that stuff is going to made of good quality materials? Do you think that cooling is suitable?

Lets get to the point here, this build you cooked up is nothing but a deathtrap. It fails to meet current game standards and it certainly won't be playing anything that comes out in 2015. If you have saved $300 for something to play games on, play a 3DS and a stack of games rather then this POS.

So now the argument has gone from "it won't work with that power supply. It's too weak" to "That psu is powerful enough, but it's not a brand name I like therefore it is more prone to failure, despite not on bit of statistical evidence to back it up". That's called MOVING THE GOALPOST.

I never said it wouldn't work, I'm talking about poor quailty that PSU is. I showed you a PSU that is bargain basement and is rated to more than what the TC used and it failed to produce less than half of what it was supposed to. I used that to highlight the danger of using cheap PSU's. You seem hellbent on showing that you can create a PC that rivials consoles for under $300. To that end, no. You can't create a PC that costs less than $300 and still have to compete with consoles. I also find it amusing that TC is using a BF4 benchmark to try and prove his point when his build in the OP doesn't even have Windows included. BF4 does not run natively under Linux and no amount of fucking around with WINE is going to make it run like it would under Windows. Does he expect owners to pirate it?

you talk like battlefield 4 is free to play online on consoles

wanna talk software costs?

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#167 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

@farrell2k said:

@lostrib said:

because if your benchmarks for the PC is going to be BF4, then the PC should probably be able to play BF4

That PC is able to play BF4. You cannot commit the fallacy of hasty generalization by assuming that because not everyone has a license for Windows which they could transfer, that everyone specifically doesn't have a transferable because it helps your argument.

Well this thread is moot then. People who are already PC gamers will be playing games on a better rig than this and for console gamers this build offers ZERO incentive to jump ship.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#168 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

@leandrro said:

@clyde46 said:

@farrell2k said:

@clyde46 said:

You just don't get it do you.

Sure enough, after a few minutes of test one, we got an electrical zzzt sound and the unit was dead. At 184 watts, it died. Seems a long way from 650 watts, doesn't it? We didn't even get a chance at using the scope on this one, it went out that soon.

http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&op=Story&reid=71

A 650W rated PSU that died failing to provide less than 200W... Let me say that again to reenforce the point. It died failing to provide less than 50% of what its rated at.... Now you say that the world is running on sub-par PSU's which is true i'll give you that but those people are not putting in dedicated video cards, they aren't pushing those PSU's at all. Lets look at what the inside of the 650W PSU looked like.

Do you really think that stuff is going to made of good quality materials? Do you think that cooling is suitable?

Lets get to the point here, this build you cooked up is nothing but a deathtrap. It fails to meet current game standards and it certainly won't be playing anything that comes out in 2015. If you have saved $300 for something to play games on, play a 3DS and a stack of games rather then this POS.

So now the argument has gone from "it won't work with that power supply. It's too weak" to "That psu is powerful enough, but it's not a brand name I like therefore it is more prone to failure, despite not on bit of statistical evidence to back it up". That's called MOVING THE GOALPOST.

I never said it wouldn't work, I'm talking about poor quailty that PSU is. I showed you a PSU that is bargain basement and is rated to more than what the TC used and it failed to produce less than half of what it was supposed to. I used that to highlight the danger of using cheap PSU's. You seem hellbent on showing that you can create a PC that rivials consoles for under $300. To that end, no. You can't create a PC that costs less than $300 and still have to compete with consoles. I also find it amusing that TC is using a BF4 benchmark to try and prove his point when his build in the OP doesn't even have Windows included. BF4 does not run natively under Linux and no amount of fucking around with WINE is going to make it run like it would under Windows. Does he expect owners to pirate it?

you talk like battlefield 4 is free to play online on consoles

wanna talk software costs?

I can play BF4 single player on PS4 and X1...... I can't do that on your build.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@tormentos: It's pretty well known that manufacturer tend to exaggerate the minimum PSU requirement. A good 500w could run a 780!

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170  Edited By Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

@leandrro said:

@lostrib said:

@leandrro said:

@lostrib said:

@farrell2k said:

@lostrib said:

But it's up to the TC to prove it's true...

Or are you saying that since Cranler can't prove it false, it's true?

That is also an argument from ignorance, and no. Did you two just purposely not read the sites with benchmarks that he linked in his original post???

you mean the ones for BF4 which this $299 PC can't play?

oh yeah...sure....

Loading Video...

which your $299 build can't play

sure...

Loading Video...

That card can't handle medium settings. Dropped to single digits many times.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#171 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@farrell2k said:

@lostrib said:

because if your benchmarks for the PC is going to be BF4, then the PC should probably be able to play BF4

That PC is able to play BF4. You cannot commit the fallacy of hasty generalization by assuming that because not everyone has a license for Windows which they could transfer, that everyone specifically doesn't have a transferable license because it helps your argument.

No, i'm saying that taking the specific build posted for $299, it cannot play BF4.

...I mean you're the one saying people can just use a transferable license, because it helps your argument

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#172 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@leandrro said:

@lostrib said:

@leandrro said:

@lostrib said:

@farrell2k said:

@lostrib said:

But it's up to the TC to prove it's true...

Or are you saying that since Cranler can't prove it false, it's true?

That is also an argument from ignorance, and no. Did you two just purposely not read the sites with benchmarks that he linked in his original post???

you mean the ones for BF4 which this $299 PC can't play?

oh yeah...sure....

which your $299 build can't play

sure...

Loading Video...

The PC you posted for $299 cannot play BF4. No amount of videos will change that

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#173 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

@MonsieurX said:

@tormentos: It's pretty well known that manufacturer tend to exaggerate the minimum PSU requirement. A good 500w could run a 780!

A good one yes but not the one in the OP.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#175 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@farrell2k said:

@clyde46 said:

I never said it wouldn't work, I'm talking about poor quailty that PSU is. I showed you a PSU that is bargain basement and is rated to more than what the TC used and it failed to produce less than half of what it was supposed to. I used that to highlight the danger of using cheap PSU's. You seem hellbent on showing that you can create a PC that rivials consoles for under $300. To that end, no. You can't create a PC that costs less than $300 and still have to compete with consoles. I also find it amusing that TC is using a BF4 benchmark to try and prove his point when his build in the OP doesn't even have Windows included. BF4 does not run natively under Linux and no amount of fucking around with WINE is going to make it run like it would under Windows. Does he expect owners to pirate it?

Your perception of the quality of the PSU is Irrelevant. Showing a video of one mechanical device failing is also statistically irrelevant. The company producing the product is still in business selling the product. If they were dangerous or didn't work they wouldn't be. We can either judge your statements by personal experience from a video, or by using real data and reason. Would you never buy a Ford because some Fords break down? If this were the case, no one would have bought the 360 because God knows so many of them broke down. same goes for the PS3 or any other manufactured product.

Your OS argument is also nonsense. The OS doesn't change the capabilities of the hardware. This hardware will always be more powerful than the hardware in the XB1.

Now you are grasping at straws.

Well if some fords were of shitty build quality and burst into flame, I probably would avoid it

Avatar image for leandrro
leandrro

1644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -2

User Lists: 0

#177 leandrro
Member since 2007 • 1644 Posts

@tormentos said:
@leandrro said:

i have the same card as you but my $600 PC cost me only $400

R7260x needs 500W PSU LOL, you know Sh*** about PSUs do you?

do you even know what is TDP? what is a 12v rail?

this build need 115W for GPU and 54W for CPU + ABOUT 20W for the rest = 179W youre safe with a $10 250W PSU, 400W PSU is a big waste

I don't think you own a PC i think you are a die hard troll.

And the R9270 you used last time needs a 500watts PSU i know i have that same card.oh did i mention i didn't buy an HDD with my PC or even a case fan.? Which your case doesn't have either.?

20 watts for the rest..hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

You build like a moron and i already prove that,so once again what will be next time.? Mounting the components on a piece or plastic because you don't need a case.?

Hahahaha...

@farrell2k said:

What the hell doesn't he understand? He posted the card's max watt usage. Do you understand that minimum recommendations for power supplies are RECOMMENDATIONS for average system builds when using that card? Is it so hard to comprehend the words average and recommendation? Every manufacturer will tell you the max watt usage of their devices. All you have to do is add them up! Did you stop believing in math or something?

I could care less what you and the other sad troll say,this the cardboard box my R9 270 came with,this are the requirements on the back and it clearly say freaking 500 watts or greater,and for Crossfire 600watts or greater,now who should i take as valid you or the damn card manufacturer.?

He used the same sh** PSU on another system already but pair with this ^^ same GPU,and i told him so and many people told him so the PSU was sh**,the only moron who doesn't know anything about PSU is you and him,which i really think now are the same loser.

at tom's hardware they make builds with parts that the recommended wattage on their boxes add up to 1200W, and they do it with 500W PSUs

why dont you go there and call them losers?

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#178 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@leandrro said:

at tom's hardware they make builds with parts that the recommended wattage on their boxes add up to 1200W, and they do it with 500W PSUs

why dont you go there and call them losers?

please provide some examples

Avatar image for leandrro
leandrro

1644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -2

User Lists: 0

#179 leandrro
Member since 2007 • 1644 Posts

@lostrib said:

@leandrro said:

@lostrib said:

@leandrro said:

@lostrib said:

@farrell2k said:

@lostrib said:

But it's up to the TC to prove it's true...

Or are you saying that since Cranler can't prove it false, it's true?

That is also an argument from ignorance, and no. Did you two just purposely not read the sites with benchmarks that he linked in his original post???

you mean the ones for BF4 which this $299 PC can't play?

oh yeah...sure....

which your $299 build can't play

sure...

Loading Video...

The PC you posted for $299 cannot play BF4. No amount of videos will change that

sure, a 7770 can but a R7 260X cannot, why is it so hard for people in SW to just say: "ok, youre right, ive just said shit" ?

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#181 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@leandrro said:

@lostrib said:

The PC you posted for $299 cannot play BF4. No amount of videos will change that

sure, a 7770 can but a R7 260X cannot, why is it so hard for people in SW to just say: "ok, youre right, ive just said shit" ?

Nope, the $299 build you posted cannot play BF4

Try all you want, you'll still be wrong

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#182 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

I didn't really read through all the pages. But, are we comparing an Intel Pentium G3220 dualcore to an AMD Vishera-based 6-core FX-6300? That's what is on that Gamespot PC.

Avatar image for leandrro
leandrro

1644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -2

User Lists: 0

#183 leandrro
Member since 2007 • 1644 Posts

@clyde46 said:

@MonsieurX said:

@tormentos: It's pretty well known that manufacturer tend to exaggerate the minimum PSU requirement. A good 500w could run a 780!

A good one yes but not the one in the OP.

agreed, the one on the OP is good for 115W R7 260X on a 180W build

the real certified 500W is good for a GTX 780 on a 400W build

but PSUs are very cheap, a very decent 450W 80plus PSU is around 20-25 on newegg

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#184 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

@farrell2k said:

@tormentos: Just stop. Now you are comparing the power recommendations for two different cards. Wow. You cannot fix stupid....

@clyde46 said:

I never said it wouldn't work, I'm talking about poor quailty that PSU is. I showed you a PSU that is bargain basement and is rated to more than what the TC used and it failed to produce less than half of what it was supposed to. I used that to highlight the danger of using cheap PSU's. You seem hellbent on showing that you can create a PC that rivials consoles for under $300. To that end, no. You can't create a PC that costs less than $300 and still have to compete with consoles. I also find it amusing that TC is using a BF4 benchmark to try and prove his point when his build in the OP doesn't even have Windows included. BF4 does not run natively under Linux and no amount of fucking around with WINE is going to make it run like it would under Windows. Does he expect owners to pirate it?

Your perception of the quality of the PSU is Irrelevant. Showing a video of one mechanical device failing is also statistically irrelevant. The company producing the product is still in business selling the product. If they were dangerous or didn't work they wouldn't be. We can either judge your statements by personal experience from a video, or by using real data and reason. Would you never buy a Ford because some Fords break down? If this were the case, no one would have bought the 360 because God knows so many of them broke down. same goes for the PS3 or any other manufactured product.

Your OS argument is also nonsense. The OS doesn't change the capabilities of the hardware. This hardware will always be more powerful than the hardware in the XB1.

Now you are grasping at straws.

If you are going to continue to cover your eyes and ears over this then so be it. There is statistical evidence that those PSU's fail and when they do fail they lack the safety features to stop them catching fire and burning your house down. At the very least they will take your rig down with them when they die. There is a reason why nearly every season PC builder will tell you never to use cheap PSU's. The only reason they are still around is because they supply them in bulk to companies like Hp, Dell and Acer who get massive discounts. That is manufacturing 101, reduce your costs down to the lowest point to maximize your profit.

The OS argument is valid, how else are you going to play BF4 unless you either pirate a copy of Windows or spend $100 on a legit copy. You are correct in saying that the OS doesn't change the hardware but that is like having a sports car with no gas. It looks good but whats the point if you can't drive it.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#185  Edited By lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@farrell2k said:

@lostrib said:

Well if some fords were of shitty build quality and burst into flame, I probably would avoid it

Then slowly back away from the monitor you are sitting in front of, or the mobile device upon which you are replying, because some of them have been known to explode as well, even the Sony ones...

I didn't realize you knew what monitor I used

The difference being that diablotek has a rather shitty reputation in terms of build quality/performance

Avatar image for leandrro
leandrro

1644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -2

User Lists: 0

#186 leandrro
Member since 2007 • 1644 Posts

@clyde46 said:

@farrell2k said:

@tormentos: Just stop. Now you are comparing the power recommendations for two different cards. Wow. You cannot fix stupid....

@clyde46 said:

I never said it wouldn't work, I'm talking about poor quailty that PSU is. I showed you a PSU that is bargain basement and is rated to more than what the TC used and it failed to produce less than half of what it was supposed to. I used that to highlight the danger of using cheap PSU's. You seem hellbent on showing that you can create a PC that rivials consoles for under $300. To that end, no. You can't create a PC that costs less than $300 and still have to compete with consoles. I also find it amusing that TC is using a BF4 benchmark to try and prove his point when his build in the OP doesn't even have Windows included. BF4 does not run natively under Linux and no amount of fucking around with WINE is going to make it run like it would under Windows. Does he expect owners to pirate it?

Your perception of the quality of the PSU is Irrelevant. Showing a video of one mechanical device failing is also statistically irrelevant. The company producing the product is still in business selling the product. If they were dangerous or didn't work they wouldn't be. We can either judge your statements by personal experience from a video, or by using real data and reason. Would you never buy a Ford because some Fords break down? If this were the case, no one would have bought the 360 because God knows so many of them broke down. same goes for the PS3 or any other manufactured product.

Your OS argument is also nonsense. The OS doesn't change the capabilities of the hardware. This hardware will always be more powerful than the hardware in the XB1.

Now you are grasping at straws.

If you are going to continue to cover your eyes and ears over this then so be it. There is statistical evidence that those PSU's fail and when they do fail they lack the safety features to stop them catching fire and burning your house down. At the very least they will take your rig down with them when they die. There is a reason why nearly every season PC builder will tell you never to use cheap PSU's. The only reason they are still around is because they supply them in bulk to companies like Hp, Dell and Acer who get massive discounts. That is manufacturing 101, reduce your costs down to the lowest point to maximize your profit.

The OS argument is valid, how else are you going to play BF4 unless you either pirate a copy of Windows or spend $100 on a legit copy. You are correct in saying that the OS doesn't change the hardware but that is like having a sports car with no gas. It looks good but whats the point if you can't drive it.

have you ever seen a PSU fail? like for real? do you know what really happens?

ps4/x1 without live or PS+ is a sports car without gas

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#187 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

@leandrro said:

@clyde46 said:

@MonsieurX said:

@tormentos: It's pretty well known that manufacturer tend to exaggerate the minimum PSU requirement. A good 500w could run a 780!

A good one yes but not the one in the OP.

agreed, the one on the OP is good for 115W R7 260X on a 180W build

the real certified 500W is good for a GTX 780 on a 400W build

but PSUs are very cheap, a very decent 450W 80plus PSU is around 20-25 on newegg

Again, refer to my last post on this. That 650W failed to produce less that 200W. That PSU was supposed to be rated to provide 650W of power but it died not being able to produce less than half. I ran a GTX580 at stock clocks on a Silverstone Strider 500W and that thing was getting hot. That is a 80+ Bronze PSU and even that was running at its limit. The rest of the parts with a dual core pentium 775 and 4GB of RAM and one HDD. Nothing crazy but it still had problems. Do you really think that a 400W would be able to run a gaming build with a 780?

Avatar image for leandrro
leandrro

1644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -2

User Lists: 0

#188  Edited By leandrro
Member since 2007 • 1644 Posts

@lostrib said:

@leandrro said:

at tom's hardware they make builds with parts that the recommended wattage on their boxes add up to 1200W, and they do it with 500W PSUs

why dont you go there and call them losers?

please provide some examples

$2400 PC on a 750W PSU, for the dumb logic it would require 1200W just for the graphics cards

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/system-builder-marathon-pc-overclocking,3771.html

Avatar image for leandrro
leandrro

1644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -2

User Lists: 0

#190 leandrro
Member since 2007 • 1644 Posts

@clyde46 said:

@leandrro said:

@clyde46 said:

@MonsieurX said:

@tormentos: It's pretty well known that manufacturer tend to exaggerate the minimum PSU requirement. A good 500w could run a 780!

A good one yes but not the one in the OP.

agreed, the one on the OP is good for 115W R7 260X on a 180W build

the real certified 500W is good for a GTX 780 on a 400W build

but PSUs are very cheap, a very decent 450W 80plus PSU is around 20-25 on newegg

Again, refer to my last post on this. That 650W failed to produce less that 200W. That PSU was supposed to be rated to provide 650W of power but it died not being able to produce less than half. I ran a GTX580 at stock clocks on a Silverstone Strider 500W and that thing was getting hot. That is a 80+ Bronze PSU and even that was running at its limit. The rest of the parts with a dual core pentium 775 and 4GB of RAM and one HDD. Nothing crazy but it still had problems. Do you really think that a 400W would be able to run a gaming build with a 780?

hell no, those PSUs are 200W PSU projects, no one makes 100W PSUs, they are all at least 200W, those dirty manufacturers get a 200W PSU and label it 600W, but even knowing its fake its good for a 180W gaming PC

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#191 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
@leandrro said:

@clyde46 said:

@farrell2k said:

@tormentos: Just stop. Now you are comparing the power recommendations for two different cards. Wow. You cannot fix stupid....

@clyde46 said:

I never said it wouldn't work, I'm talking about poor quailty that PSU is. I showed you a PSU that is bargain basement and is rated to more than what the TC used and it failed to produce less than half of what it was supposed to. I used that to highlight the danger of using cheap PSU's. You seem hellbent on showing that you can create a PC that rivials consoles for under $300. To that end, no. You can't create a PC that costs less than $300 and still have to compete with consoles. I also find it amusing that TC is using a BF4 benchmark to try and prove his point when his build in the OP doesn't even have Windows included. BF4 does not run natively under Linux and no amount of fucking around with WINE is going to make it run like it would under Windows. Does he expect owners to pirate it?

Your perception of the quality of the PSU is Irrelevant. Showing a video of one mechanical device failing is also statistically irrelevant. The company producing the product is still in business selling the product. If they were dangerous or didn't work they wouldn't be. We can either judge your statements by personal experience from a video, or by using real data and reason. Would you never buy a Ford because some Fords break down? If this were the case, no one would have bought the 360 because God knows so many of them broke down. same goes for the PS3 or any other manufactured product.

Your OS argument is also nonsense. The OS doesn't change the capabilities of the hardware. This hardware will always be more powerful than the hardware in the XB1.

Now you are grasping at straws.

If you are going to continue to cover your eyes and ears over this then so be it. There is statistical evidence that those PSU's fail and when they do fail they lack the safety features to stop them catching fire and burning your house down. At the very least they will take your rig down with them when they die. There is a reason why nearly every season PC builder will tell you never to use cheap PSU's. The only reason they are still around is because they supply them in bulk to companies like Hp, Dell and Acer who get massive discounts. That is manufacturing 101, reduce your costs down to the lowest point to maximize your profit.

The OS argument is valid, how else are you going to play BF4 unless you either pirate a copy of Windows or spend $100 on a legit copy. You are correct in saying that the OS doesn't change the hardware but that is like having a sports car with no gas. It looks good but whats the point if you can't drive it.

have you ever seen a PSU fail? like for real? do you know what really happens?

ps4/x1 without live or PS+ is a sports car without gas

Jesus Christ man, I've seen enough evidence online to know what happens to a shit PSU. I have seen many go as a matter of fact. I used to see them blowing up at my school all the time. Shit tier PSU's used because the company was skimping to squeeze more profit.

I can go to the store and grab an X1 or PS4 with BF4 and bring it home and I can play it. I can not play BF4 on your build without either resorting to piracy or spending another $100 on a Windows license.... Do I get the same experience out of BF4 without XBL or PSN+? No but its better than not being able to play at all.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#192 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@leandrro said:

@lostrib said:

@leandrro said:

at tom's hardware they make builds with parts that the recommended wattage on their boxes add up to 1200W, and they do it with 500W PSUs

why dont you go there and call them losers?

please provide some examples

$2400 PC on a 750W PSU, for the dumb logic it would require 1200W just for the graphics cards

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/system-builder-marathon-pc-overclocking,3771.html

except you don't just add the wattage together for the GPUs. Even el tormo pointed that out "requirements on the back and it clearly say freaking 500 watts or greater,and for Crossfire 600watts or greater"

Avatar image for leandrro
leandrro

1644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -2

User Lists: 0

#193 leandrro
Member since 2007 • 1644 Posts

@lostrib said:

@leandrro said:

@lostrib said:

@leandrro said:

at tom's hardware they make builds with parts that the recommended wattage on their boxes add up to 1200W, and they do it with 500W PSUs

why dont you go there and call them losers?

please provide some examples

$2400 PC on a 750W PSU, for the dumb logic it would require 1200W just for the graphics cards

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/system-builder-marathon-pc-overclocking,3771.html

except you don't just add the wattage together for the GPUs. Even el tormo pointed that out "requirements on the back and it clearly say freaking 500 watts or greater,and for Crossfire 600watts or greater"

good, you learnt somthing, next lesson: TDP, what is it? is it important?

Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#194 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

No actual none daft gamer would spend less than $500 on a gaming rig. If you go the cheap route with PC gaming you're gonna regret it, shyte ain't gonna last and you'll miss out on a few games that actually have the above avg system requirements.

I just dropped $950 on my new rig and I love it (I've got my moneys worth), sure I should have went with 16gb of ram instead of 8gb and go with the 760 4gb instead of the 2gb version but that would have costed me an extra $130 or so but I had to spend that possible extra cash on getting my computer here asap. The more money you put into a gaming PC the longer it will last (hopefully) and the higher the settings you can achieve in games.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#195 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@leandrro said:

@lostrib said:

@leandrro said:

@lostrib said:

@leandrro said:

at tom's hardware they make builds with parts that the recommended wattage on their boxes add up to 1200W, and they do it with 500W PSUs

why dont you go there and call them losers?

please provide some examples

$2400 PC on a 750W PSU, for the dumb logic it would require 1200W just for the graphics cards

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/system-builder-marathon-pc-overclocking,3771.html

except you don't just add the wattage together for the GPUs. Even el tormo pointed that out "requirements on the back and it clearly say freaking 500 watts or greater,and for Crossfire 600watts or greater"

good, you learnt somthing, next lesson: TDP, what is it? is it important?

I already knew that, which is why i pointed it out.

I mean is it any wonder that you get negative reactions to your threads/posts when you act like such an asshole

Avatar image for leandrro
leandrro

1644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -2

User Lists: 0

#196 leandrro
Member since 2007 • 1644 Posts

@Ballroompirate said:

No actual none daft gamer would spend less than $500 on a gaming rig. If you go the cheap route with PC gaming you're gonna regret it, shyte ain't gonna last and you'll miss out on a few games that actually have the above avg system requirements.

I just dropped $950 on my new rig and I love it (I've got my moneys worth), sure I should have went with 16gb of ram instead of 8gb and go with the 760 4gb instead of the 2gb version but that would have costed me an extra $130 or so but I had to spend that possible extra cash on getting my computer here asap. The more money you put into a gaming PC the longer it will last (hopefully) and the higher the settings you can achieve in games.

but bro, i only have 300, and i cant play without kb and mouse... what you got for me?

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#197 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@leandrro said:

@Ballroompirate said:

No actual none daft gamer would spend less than $500 on a gaming rig. If you go the cheap route with PC gaming you're gonna regret it, shyte ain't gonna last and you'll miss out on a few games that actually have the above avg system requirements.

I just dropped $950 on my new rig and I love it (I've got my moneys worth), sure I should have went with 16gb of ram instead of 8gb and go with the 760 4gb instead of the 2gb version but that would have costed me an extra $130 or so but I had to spend that possible extra cash on getting my computer here asap. The more money you put into a gaming PC the longer it will last (hopefully) and the higher the settings you can achieve in games.

but bro, i only have 300, and i cant play without kb and mouse... what you got for me?

manage your money better

Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#198 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

@leandrro said:

@Ballroompirate said:

No actual none daft gamer would spend less than $500 on a gaming rig. If you go the cheap route with PC gaming you're gonna regret it, shyte ain't gonna last and you'll miss out on a few games that actually have the above avg system requirements.

I just dropped $950 on my new rig and I love it (I've got my moneys worth), sure I should have went with 16gb of ram instead of 8gb and go with the 760 4gb instead of the 2gb version but that would have costed me an extra $130 or so but I had to spend that possible extra cash on getting my computer here asap. The more money you put into a gaming PC the longer it will last (hopefully) and the higher the settings you can achieve in games.

but bro, i only have 300, and i cant play without kb and mouse... what you got for me?

Save up or get a better job

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#199  Edited By clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

@farrell2k said:

@clyde46 said:

If you are going to continue to cover your eyes and ears over this then so be it. There is statistical evidence that those PSU's fail and when they do fail they lack the safety features to stop them catching fire and burning your house down. At the very least they will take your rig down with them when they die. There is a reason why nearly every season PC builder will tell you never to use cheap PSU's. The only reason they are still around is because they supply them in bulk to companies like Hp, Dell and Acer who get massive discounts. That is manufacturing 101, reduce your costs down to the lowest point to maximize your profit.

The OS argument is valid, how else are you going to play BF4 unless you either pirate a copy of Windows or spend $100 on a legit copy. You are correct in saying that the OS doesn't change the hardware but that is like having a sports car with no gas. It looks good but whats the point if you can't drive it.

So now you want us to believe that there have been many verified accounts of pc power supplies catching fire INSIDE A METAL BOX, which is also inside a metal box, and burning down entire houses? Just stop. Do you not realize that most of these power supplies and 100% of the components come from only a few places in China and that every company just slaps their name on them? If you really believe that one power supply is really any more a of a quality product than another, then you are very ignorant of the world in which you live. It's not like the "brand name" ones operate on a different set of the laws of physics. Eh, whatever...

No, you stop spreading lies about cheap PSU's. If you look at all the top tier brands, they all use good quailty parts. Physics does not come into this, if the item in question is using shoddy parts with shoddy construction then it will fail a lot sooner. That is a fact period. You do know that the PCB can and does catch fire? You do know that there are things inside your PC case that are flamable? You do know that most fires start from cheap electronics shorting out?

Lets look inside one of these cheap PSU's that case companies like to throw in.

Well do you look at that, its the same insides as that 650W from earlier. Now lets compare that to a PSU from a well respected maker of good PSU's.

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#200  Edited By jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

@leandrro said:

but bro, i only have 300, and i cant play without kb and mouse... what you got for me?

Buy a cheap 360 or PS3 plus one of this:

Penguin United Eagle Eye keyboard and mouse converter.

Loading Video...