I don't get the point of such poor-man's builds. They are severely limited and will probably not last long.
Might as well shell out some more and save in the long run.
Nothing wrong with buying an inexpensive PC that will outperform a specific console. You don't have to play the same games that the console plays, and the system isn't going to get weaker over time.
Seriously, I would never recommend such a build.
Yes it is possible to build a machine(without the OS) for 300$,is it any good? Nope.
Why do you need to buy an OS? You can't play one of the hundreds of free games on Linux, or can't just call up Microsoft to transfer your windows license to the new PC like people do every day? If a console is considered good, how can a pc that outperforms a console be bad?
Because not everyone has a Windows license to transfer...
Especially if they are jumping into PC gaming for the first time.
Log in to comment