PC to be destroyed next year. Xbox 720 specs= AMD 7990. 16 Core CPU, 4GB Ram

I already proved 360 has best version of Oblivion. Its your turn to prove Witcher 2 can run on 7800reach3

[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="reach3"]

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

It would be pretty sad if X360 couldn't play games like Halo 4 or Witcher 2.

jokeisgames2012

[QUOTE="jokeisgames2012"][QUOTE="dakan45"] Yet they can. And 7800 card can't. Now that is whats sad...

reach3

It's probably a bad sign when even your bullshots dont look that good

[QUOTE="jokeisgames2012"][QUOTE="dakan45"] Yet they can. And 7800 card can't. Now that is whats sad...

reach3

[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="jokeisgames2012"] Did you not notice the low resolution texture top right corner? lower res than quake 1 sh*tlostrib

It's probably a bad sign when even your bullshots dont look that good

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="reach3"] If that looks like Quake 1, then what does fear and prey look like? because halo 4 and even perfect dark zero stomp all over them.reach3

It's probably a bad sign when even your bullshots dont look that good

[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="lostrib"]

It's probably a bad sign when even your bullshots dont look that good

jokeisgames2012

This is a load of crap because they will not be able to sufficiently cool a 7990 in a console sized enclosure lolSPBoss

shadow maps look like sh1t the edges are pixelated, doom3 interiors look better hopefully they finally caught up with doom3's lighting jokeisgames2012

yodogpollywog?

[QUOTE="jokeisgames2012"]shadow maps look like sh1t the edges are pixelated, doom3 interiors look better hopefully they finally caught up with doom3's lighting Inconsistancy

[QUOTE="SPBoss"]This is a load of crap because they will not be able to sufficiently cool a 7990 in a console sized enclosure loljokeisgames2012

1. Swiftshader 3.0 CPU performance says Hi. Both Swiftshader 3.0 and AMD driver stack uses LLVM (low level virtual machine) JIT recompliers.

2. CPUs ussualy has less ALUs compared to "fat" GPU.

3. X86 CPUs has it's own extensions e.g. incoming AVX2 SIMD. Without OpenCL, existing applications can't use AVX1/AVX2 extensions. AMD's OpenCL CPU driver is faster than Intel's OpenCL CPU driver and existing applications can use AVX1 and soon AVX2. OpenCL has it's own version targets.

[QUOTE="jokeisgames2012"][QUOTE="SPBoss"]This is a load of crap because they will not be able to sufficiently cool a 7990 in a console sized enclosure lolronvalencia

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="jokeisgames2012"] thats why video cards suck and software rendering is better, cpus dont run as hot and arent limited by a specifc version of direct x jokeisgames2012

Swiftshader has similar LLVM recomplier technology as in AMD's GPU drivers.

[QUOTE="jokeisgames2012"][QUOTE="ronvalencia"] 1. Swiftshader 3.0 CPU performance says Hi. Both Swiftshader 3.0 and AMD driver stack uses LLVM JIT recompliers. 2. CPUs ussualy less ALUs compared to "fat" GPU. 3 X86 CPUs has it's own extensions e.g. incoming AVX2 SIMD. Without OpenCL, existing applications can't use AVX1/AVX2 extensions. AMD's OpenCL CPU driver is faster than Intel's OpenCL CPU driver and existing applications can use AVX1 and soon AVX2.ronvalencia

[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="Jebus213"] Show me a console game that can do 1080p and 60FPS with Halo 4's graphics.Jebus213

[QUOTE="Jebus213"][QUOTE="reach3"] while 2005 + 2006 pc cant.reach3

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="jokeisgames2012"] switchshader isnt a true software renderer it emulates direct x api made for video cardsjokeisgames2012

As as example, a good modular program can have a function call to a change color value which can be targeted for CPU backend or GPU backend.

Swiftshader 3.0 *is* the DX9c software renderer for X86 CPU backend.

AMD's GPU doesn't directly execute Direct3D API i.e. you have to hit AMD's LLVM layer before you hit GPU's ISA. AMD's LLVM manages the changes with various AMD GPU ISA e.g. Cypress's VLIW5, Cayman's VLIW4 and GCN's SIMD.

Swiftshader has a similar LLVM software tech but targets X86 CPUs, it could be modifed to target Intel Xeon Phil.

AMD's OpenCL CPU driver also uses AMD's own LLVM software tech which targets X86 CPUs. On certain workloads, it was proven to be faster than Intel's complier technology.

[QUOTE="jokeisgames2012"][QUOTE="ronvalencia"] Swiftshader has similar LLVM recomplier technology as in AMD GPU drivers. ronvalencia

[QUOTE="Jebus213"][QUOTE="reach3"] while 2005 + 2006 pc cant.reach3

[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="Jebus213"] I don't even see how that's even relevant anyway.04dcarraher

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="reach3"] completely relevant really. 360 was graphic king until crysis matched it. Yet hermits refuse to admit (except Wasdie, admited it, he is the only smart hermit here)reach3

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="jokeisgames2012"] swtchshader is not built into crysis it's a third party app that trys to emulate direct x 9 with a cpu. THAT'S NOT TRUE SOFTWARE RENDERING STUPID FOOK jokeisgames2012

[QUOTE="jokeisgames2012"][QUOTE="ronvalencia"] AMD's GPU doesn't directly execute Direct3D API i.e. you have to hit AMD's LLVM layer before you hit GPU's ISA. AMD's LLVM manages the changes with various AMD GPU ISA e.g. Cypress's VLIW5, Cayman's VLIW4 and GCN's SIMD. Swiftshader has a similar LLVM software tech but targets X86 CPUs, it could be modifed to target Intel Xeon Phil. AMD's OpenCL CPU driver also uses AMD's own LLVM software tech which targets X86 CPUs. On certain workloads, it was proven to be faster than Intel's complier technology.ronvalencia

the most advanced engine right now in 2012 is software rendering. proving hardware sucks peenjokeisgames2012

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="jokeisgames2012"] microsoft stopped developing direct 3d like 12+ years ago dumbass Jebus213

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="reach3"] If that looks like Quake 1, then what does fear and prey look like? because halo 4 and even perfect dark zero stomp all over them.reach3

It's probably a bad sign when even your bullshots dont look that good

It doesnt look that good. The only part of all the halo4 shots is Master chief. All the other parts look rather low res and blurry