Planetside 2 will OUTCLASS Halo 4

[QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

I said it's going to be better than Halo 4, which isn't even out yet and is being produced by a whole different studio. You need to learn to read.

Good god. Really? You're the one calling me dumb and telling me to read when you've clearly not read a word I have written.

Wasdie

You do realize these are fanboyish statements tho right?

You realize it's a character flaw in you.

Game X that's not out will be better than Game Y that's not out (that aren't even in the same genre.)

You're trying to create hype for things that don't exist based on your own fanhood.

Not the same genre? They are FPSs, competitive FPSs on the multiplayer front. Of course I can compare them. How is it fanboyish of me to say that one game is going to be better than the other? I have looked just as much content as they ahve released about Halo 4 and Planetside 2 and I have come to my own conclusion.

Please tell me how that's being a fanboy? I'm not sitting here saying that Planetside 2 is better by default because it's a PC game, I'm not saying Halo 4 is trash because it's a console game. I'm probably the only one around here that actively plays both Planetside and Halo.

I'm just saying I think Planetside 2 is going to be better than Halo 4. When it's all said and done, Planetside 2 is going to offer far more hours of unique gameplay than Halo 4 due to its design. The focus on teamwork, large scale battles, and persistence is going to make me enjoy it a lot more than Halo 4, especially since Halo Reach left a bad taste in my mouth and Halo 4 is continuing with more of the design philosophies of Halo Reach.

I just don't get the place. A guy can't have an opinion around here.

One is SP/MP/Co-op and the other is an MMO.

Even Sony's not stupid enough to claim it's better than Halo 4, it's not even in the same category.

Pure fanboyism on your part imo.

It's ok to have an opinion, just understand that it's gonna get flack, doubly so when the games don't even exist yet.

it looks OK, i think halo will be the tigher experience and more consistent.

Planetside looks like it will have some really insane moments but it also looks like its going to be a massive cluster **** 5 mins into a fight.

savagetwinkie

it looks OK, i think halo will be the tigher experience and more consistent.

Planetside looks like it will have some really insane moments but it also looks like its going to be a massive cluster **** 5 mins into a fight.

savagetwinkie

Tribes ascend already outclasses halo 4. Planetside 2 will completely destroy it.

SamiRDuran

Actually Haze is better than Planetside 2 at the moment because it has actually been released. That is also a fact.

WarTornRuston

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/planetside

Wow an 81 way back when reviews (and gamers) had much lower expectations. Holy......................I changed my mine. Plantside 2 will just change the way we play first person shooters FOREVER!!!!!!!!

And when Planetside 2 gets around a 7 and you all start talking about how meh! it is, I will be sure to throw this thread back in your face.

Funny- If Planetside 2 got 90's across the board, big time sales, and 500,000 people playing it online constantly you all would be throwing that at me like it was proof the game was viable versus Halo. But since I did it......It musy be an opinion right? It only works when it benefit's you. In a forum where sales and Gamespot scores mean everything (And I have even seen you Mr.Mod say to people the Gamespot score does matter), you all sure wanna back out of that argument in a hurry.

Pathetic. Like I said before. I am off to play Spec Ops and watch the Timbers game. I will leave you all to troll someone else.

[QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

I said it's going to be better than Halo 4, which isn't even out yet and is being produced by a whole different studio. You need to learn to read.

Good god. Really? You're the one calling me dumb and telling me to read when you've clearly not read a word I have written.

Wasdie

You do realize these are fanboyish statements tho right?

You realize it's a character flaw in you.

Game X that's not out will be better than Game Y that's not out (that aren't even in the same genre.)

You're trying to create hype for things that don't exist based on your own fanhood.

Not the same genre? They are FPSs, competitive FPSs on the multiplayer front. Of course I can compare them. If you say I cannot compare them to technicalties and sub genres, then it's clear you don't even want to have an arugment, you just want to point out that I'm wrong for comparing them according to your standards. How is it fanboyish of me to say that one game is going to be better than the other? I have looked just as much content as they ahve released about Halo 4 and Planetside 2 and I have come to my own conclusion.

Please tell me how that's being a fanboy? I'm not sitting here saying that Planetside 2 is better by default because it's a PC game, I'm not saying Halo 4 is trash because it's a console game. I'm probably the only one around here that actively plays both Planetside and Halo.

I'm just saying I think Planetside 2 is going to be better than Halo 4. When it's all said and done, Planetside 2 is going to offer far more hours of unique gameplay than Halo 4 due to its design. The focus on teamwork, large scale battles, and persistence is going to make me enjoy it a lot more than Halo 4, especially since Halo Reach left a bad taste in my mouth and Halo 4 is continuing with more of the design philosophies of Halo Reach.

I just don't get the place. A guy can't have an opinion around here.

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"]

it looks OK, i think halo will be the tigher experience and more consistent.

Planetside looks like it will have some really insane moments but it also looks like its going to be a massive cluster **** 5 mins into a fight.

Zlychop

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]

You do realize these are fanboyish statements tho right?

You realize it's a character flaw in you.

Game X that's not out will be better than Game Y that's not out (that aren't even in the same genre.)

You're trying to create hype for things that don't exist based on your own fanhood.

ZombieKiller7

Not the same genre? They are FPSs, competitive FPSs on the multiplayer front. Of course I can compare them. How is it fanboyish of me to say that one game is going to be better than the other? I have looked just as much content as they ahve released about Halo 4 and Planetside 2 and I have come to my own conclusion.

Please tell me how that's being a fanboy? I'm not sitting here saying that Planetside 2 is better by default because it's a PC game, I'm not saying Halo 4 is trash because it's a console game. I'm probably the only one around here that actively plays both Planetside and Halo.

I'm just saying I think Planetside 2 is going to be better than Halo 4. When it's all said and done, Planetside 2 is going to offer far more hours of unique gameplay than Halo 4 due to its design. The focus on teamwork, large scale battles, and persistence is going to make me enjoy it a lot more than Halo 4, especially since Halo Reach left a bad taste in my mouth and Halo 4 is continuing with more of the design philosophies of Halo Reach.

I just don't get the place. A guy can't have an opinion around here.

One is SP/MP/Co-op and the other is an MMO.

Even Sony's not stupid enough to claim it's better than Halo 4, it's not even in the same category.

Pure fanboyism on your part imo.

It's ok to have an opinion, just understand that it's gonna get flack, doubly so when the games don't even exist yet.

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/planetside

Wow an 81 way back when reviews (and gamers) had much lower expectations. Holy......................I changed my mine. Plantside 2 will just change the way we play first person shooters FOREVER!!!!!!!!

And when Planetside 2 gets around a 7 and you all start talking about how meh! it is, I will be sure to throw this thread back in your face.

Funny- If Planetside 2 got 90's across the board, big time sales, and 500,000 people playing it online constantly you all would be throwing that at me like it was proof the game was viable versus Halo. But since I did it......It musy be an opinion right? It only works when it benefit's you. In a forum where sales and Gamespot scores mean everything (And I have even seen you Mr.Mod say to people the Gamespot score does matter), you all sure wanna back out of that argument in a hurry.

Pathetic. Like I said before. I am off to play Spec Ops and watch the Timbers game. I will leave you all to troll someone else.

WarTornRuston

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/planetside

Wow an 81 way back when reviews (and gamers) had much lower expectations. Holy......................I changed my mine. Plantside 2 will just change the way we play first person shooters FOREVER!!!!!!!!

And when Planetside 2 gets around a 7 and you all start talking about how meh! it is, I will be sure to throw this thread back in your face.

Funny- If Planetside 2 got 90's across the board, big time sales, and 500,000 people playing it online constantly you all would be throwing that at me like it was proof the game was viable versus Halo. But since I did it......It musy be an opinion right? It only works when it benefit's you. In a forum where sales and Gamespot scores mean everything (And I have even seen you Mr.Mod say to people the Gamespot score does matter), you all sure wanna back out of that argument in a hurry.

Pathetic. Like I said before. I am off to play Spec Ops and watch the Timbers game. I will leave you all to troll someone else.

WarTornRuston

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]It's free so I will try it, but 500 vs 500 is actually off-putting. Jankarcop

Then go to a smaller skirmish. Everything about this outclasses console fps, hell most pc fps too.

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/planetside

Wow an 81 way back when reviews (and gamers) had much lower expectations. Holy......................I changed my mine. Plantside 2 will just change the way we play first person shooters FOREVER!!!!!!!!

And when Planetside 2 gets around a 7 and you all start talking about how meh! it is, I will be sure to throw this thread back in your face.

Funny- If Planetside 2 got 90's across the board, big time sales, and 500,000 people playing it online constantly you all would be throwing that at me like it was proof the game was viable versus Halo. But since I did it......It musy be an opinion right? It only works when it benefit's you. In a forum where sales and Gamespot scores mean everything (And I have even seen you Mr.Mod say to people the Gamespot score does matter), you all sure wanna back out of that argument in a hurry.

Pathetic. Like I said before. I am off to play Spec Ops and watch the Timbers game. I will leave you all to troll someone else.

WarTornRuston

Funny, you're making some big ass assumptions there. Did I not already said that Planetside isn't in nearly the same state that it was when it launched? When it launched it had tons of technical problems that have been solved. Our internet has gotten far more stable to fix the massive latency problems. Lots of logistic and gameplay mechanics were added to the game to make it run smoother and better.

Do you think after all of these years of continued development of Planetside, an expansion pack (of which was terrible at launch btw), and the continue funding by SOE to create a brand new game engine, that the guys haven't learned anything? You think they'll make the same mistakes that they made before? You're juding the team like nothing has happened since 2003, like they just picked up and left the game. To make it even better, unlike Planetside, PS2 is free to play so the entire issue of "why do I have to pay to play an FPS that is just as good as X FPS on the market", no longer exists.

From everything I've seen, Planetside 2 is going to be an absolutly fantastic game that will rock the FPS genre. It may not get AAA scores across the board, but in the end it will have a far larger impact than just another Halo game. I will enjoy it quite a bit more too. In the end, that's all that matters.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Planetside 2 outclasses pretty much every other competitive multiplayer shooter.

SPYDER0416

Even Battlefield 3?

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]It's free so I will try it, but 500 vs 500 is actually off-putting. SaltyMeatballs

Then go to a smaller skirmish. Everything about this outclasses console fps, hell most pc fps too.

[QUOTE="Zlychop"][QUOTE="savagetwinkie"]

it looks OK, i think halo will be the tigher experience and more consistent.

Planetside looks like it will have some really insane moments but it also looks like its going to be a massive cluster **** 5 mins into a fight.

savagetwinkie

That is true and it has been accounted for. Unlike in Planetside 1, where those very chokepoints ended up in mass clusters, PS2 utilizes a more open scheme. The fight between the 3 factions is no longer focused around bases, but along a frontline that is comprised of hexagons. Each square inch of land in Planetside 2 is important and will be fought over, it's no longer just filler inbetween the important bases.

The bases in Planetside 2 also are much more open without the chokepoints.

The guys developing this have learned so much from Planetside and are improving on Planetside 2 in every way possible.

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]It's free so I will try it, but 500 vs 500 is actually off-putting. SaltyMeatballs

Then go to a smaller skirmish. Everything about this outclasses console fps, hell most pc fps too.

Well I don't think you shoudl worry. Even though the continents hold 2000 players there are 3 factions, so that's roughly 666 players per side. These players are spread across a 3 way front. The hexagon structure of the territories should spread out the battle.

Even at their biggest, I doubt the battles themselves will be larger than 250 vs 250. The battle space is also much more open, allowing for a lot of tactics instead of just mobbing chokepoints.

Most of the real beauty of the massive amount of players lies in the logistics and persistence. The battlefield is alive because players make it alive. It's very difficult to describe. You can be safely spawning from a base well behind the line one day, and the next day you're counterattacking that very base becuase it was taken over. It's almost impossible to describe with words, it is just something you will have to experiance for yourself.

[QUOTE="WarTornRuston"]

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/planetside

Wow an 81 way back when reviews (and gamers) had much lower expectations. Holy......................I changed my mine. Plantside 2 will just change the way we play first person shooters FOREVER!!!!!!!!

And when Planetside 2 gets around a 7 and you all start talking about how meh! it is, I will be sure to throw this thread back in your face.

Funny- If Planetside 2 got 90's across the board, big time sales, and 500,000 people playing it online constantly you all would be throwing that at me like it was proof the game was viable versus Halo. But since I did it......It musy be an opinion right? It only works when it benefit's you. In a forum where sales and Gamespot scores mean everything (And I have even seen you Mr.Mod say to people the Gamespot score does matter), you all sure wanna back out of that argument in a hurry.

Pathetic. Like I said before. I am off to play Spec Ops and watch the Timbers game. I will leave you all to troll someone else.

Wasdie

Funny, you're making some big ass assumptions there. Did I not already said that Planetside isn't in nearly the same state that it was when it launched? When it launched it had tons of technical problems that have been solved. Our internet has gotten far more stable to fix the massive latency problems. Lots of logistic and gameplay mechanics were added to the game to make it run smoother and better.

Do you think after all of these years of continued development of Planetside, an expansion pack (of which was terrible at launch btw), and the continue funding by SOE to create a brand new game engine, that the guys haven't learned anything? You think they'll make the same mistakes that they made before? You're juding the team like nothing has happened since 2003, like they just picked up and left the game. To make it even better, unlike Planetside, PS2 is free to play so the entire issue of "why do I have to pay to play an FPS that is just as good as X FPS on the market", no longer exists.

From everything I've seen, Planetside 2 is going to be an absolutly fantastic game that will rock the FPS genre. It may not get AAA scores across the board, but in the end it will have a far larger impact than just another Halo game. I will enjoy it quite a bit more too. In the end, that's all that matters.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="WarTornRuston"]

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/planetside

Wow an 81 way back when reviews (and gamers) had much lower expectations. Holy......................I changed my mine. Plantside 2 will just change the way we play first person shooters FOREVER!!!!!!!!

And when Planetside 2 gets around a 7 and you all start talking about how meh! it is, I will be sure to throw this thread back in your face.

Funny- If Planetside 2 got 90's across the board, big time sales, and 500,000 people playing it online constantly you all would be throwing that at me like it was proof the game was viable versus Halo. But since I did it......It musy be an opinion right? It only works when it benefit's you. In a forum where sales and Gamespot scores mean everything (And I have even seen you Mr.Mod say to people the Gamespot score does matter), you all sure wanna back out of that argument in a hurry.

Pathetic. Like I said before. I am off to play Spec Ops and watch the Timbers game. I will leave you all to troll someone else.

WarTornRuston

Funny, you're making some big ass assumptions there. Did I not already said that Planetside isn't in nearly the same state that it was when it launched? When it launched it had tons of technical problems that have been solved. Our internet has gotten far more stable to fix the massive latency problems. Lots of logistic and gameplay mechanics were added to the game to make it run smoother and better.

Do you think after all of these years of continued development of Planetside, an expansion pack (of which was terrible at launch btw), and the continue funding by SOE to create a brand new game engine, that the guys haven't learned anything? You think they'll make the same mistakes that they made before? You're juding the team like nothing has happened since 2003, like they just picked up and left the game. To make it even better, unlike Planetside, PS2 is free to play so the entire issue of "why do I have to pay to play an FPS that is just as good as X FPS on the market", no longer exists.

From everything I've seen, Planetside 2 is going to be an absolutly fantastic game that will rock the FPS genre. It may not get AAA scores across the board, but in the end it will have a far larger impact than just another Halo game. I will enjoy it quite a bit more too. In the end, that's all that matters.

Again, who gives a crap if it's AAA? Also, if Planetside was so irrelevant, why is the original still played today and PS2 generating tons of buzz? Why are you assuming PS2 will be AAA and Halo 4 will? They both have equal chances at this point. It doesn't matter that Halo 4 has a big name brand behind it, becuase it's not developed by the same people that made that name brand up. At least Planetside 2 is being made by the people who made and learned from Planetside 1. Also, why are you assuming PS2 won't be remembered? Planetside is remembered as one of the most ambitious titles that released in an era where the tech couldn't support the idea.

What we've learned today is that you really do hate PC gaming and will make any crappy assumption you want and then argue along those basis.

You're assuming that Halo 4 is going to be AAA, you're assuming it's going to win awards, you're assuming Planetside 2 won't AAA, you're assuming it won't be remembered, you're assuming quite a bit. I don't give a crap if you think that Halo 4 will be better, but you make such sweeping statements about a game you know nothing about and then call us all fools. The hypocrisy is so thick you could cut it with a knife.

[QUOTE="WarTornRuston"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Funny, you're making some big ass assumptions there. Did I not already said that Planetside isn't in nearly the same state that it was when it launched? When it launched it had tons of technical problems that have been solved. Our internet has gotten far more stable to fix the massive latency problems. Lots of logistic and gameplay mechanics were added to the game to make it run smoother and better.

Do you think after all of these years of continued development of Planetside, an expansion pack (of which was terrible at launch btw), and the continue funding by SOE to create a brand new game engine, that the guys haven't learned anything? You think they'll make the same mistakes that they made before? You're juding the team like nothing has happened since 2003, like they just picked up and left the game. To make it even better, unlike Planetside, PS2 is free to play so the entire issue of "why do I have to pay to play an FPS that is just as good as X FPS on the market", no longer exists.

From everything I've seen, Planetside 2 is going to be an absolutly fantastic game that will rock the FPS genre. It may not get AAA scores across the board, but in the end it will have a far larger impact than just another Halo game. I will enjoy it quite a bit more too. In the end, that's all that matters.

Wasdie

Again, who gives a crap if it's AAA? Also, if Planetside 2 was so irrelevant, why is the original still played today and PS2 generating tons of buzz?

What we've learned today is that you really do hate PC gaming and will make any crappy assumption you want and then argue along those basis.

You're assuming that Halo 4 is going to be AAA, you're assuming it's going to win awards, you're assuming quite a bit. I don't give a crap if you think that Halo 4 will be better, but you make such sweeping statements about a game you know nothing about and then call us all fools. The hypocrisy is so thick you could cut it with a knife.

So... you got nothing.

I WIN.

Wow this thread really just shows idiots on both sides. Console noobs who aren't willing to accept the amazing feat of 1000 players, yet still retaining order and teamwork and PC scrubs who can't accept that bigger doesn't mean better.

So... you got nothing.

I WIN.

Wasdie

Is # of players what makes a good game?

There will be an MMOFPS on 360 later this year, and one on PS3 the next.

It's not a "PC exclusive feat" it's a design decision.

Fanboyism for the lose.

Planetside is nothing special, I already played it.

Only thing fun was being an ANT driver, that was a hoot.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

So... you got nothing.

I WIN.

WarTornRuston

Sure I am. And you must be right, you're the only real gamer on this forum.

Is # of players what makes a good game?

There will be an MMOFPS on 360 later this year, and one on PS3 the next.

It's not a "PC exclusive feat" it's a design decision.

Fanboyism for the lose.

Planetside is nothing special, I already played it.

Only thing fun was being an ANT driver, that was a hoot.

ZombieKiller7

What's the MMOFPS on the 360, and the PS3? Dust 514 has persistence but is not an MMO as the rounds are still match-based. It's an MMO like World of Tanks.

Have i been arguing along the lines of # of players? I'm looking through my posts here, I really am not. If we were going pure number of players then EVE Online wins in a heartbeat.

[QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]

Is # of players what makes a good game?

There will be an MMOFPS on 360 later this year, and one on PS3 the next.

It's not a "PC exclusive feat" it's a design decision.

Fanboyism for the lose.

Planetside is nothing special, I already played it.

Only thing fun was being an ANT driver, that was a hoot.

Wasdie

What's the MMOFPS on the 360, and the PS3? Dust 514 has persistence but is not an MMO as the rounds are still match-based. It's an MMO like World of Tanks.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]

Is # of players what makes a good game?

There will be an MMOFPS on 360 later this year, and one on PS3 the next.

It's not a "PC exclusive feat" it's a design decision.

Fanboyism for the lose.

Planetside is nothing special, I already played it.

Only thing fun was being an ANT driver, that was a hoot.

Jebus213

What's the MMOFPS on the 360, and the PS3? Dust 514 has persistence but is not an MMO as the rounds are still match-based. It's an MMO like World of Tanks.

It doesn't even have a dynamic camapign. It just ties into the EVE Online world. It's unique because everything you do does effect the EVE Online world.

[QUOTE="Jebus213"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

What's the MMOFPS on the 360, and the PS3? Dust 514 has persistence but is not an MMO as the rounds are still match-based. It's an MMO like World of Tanks.Wasdie

It doesn't even have a dynamic camapign. It just ties into the EVE Online world.

[QUOTE="WarTornRuston"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

So... you got nothing.

I WIN.

Wasdie

Sure I am. And you must be right, you're the only real gamer on this forum.

[QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]

Is # of players what makes a good game?

There will be an MMOFPS on 360 later this year, and one on PS3 the next.

It's not a "PC exclusive feat" it's a design decision.

Fanboyism for the lose.

Planetside is nothing special, I already played it.

Only thing fun was being an ANT driver, that was a hoot.

Wasdie

What's the MMOFPS on the 360, and the PS3? Dust 514 has persistence but is not an MMO as the rounds are still match-based. It's an MMO like World of Tanks.

Have i been arguing along the lines of # of players? I'm looking through my posts here, I really am not. If we were going pure number of players then EVE Online wins in a heartbeat.

You were hurf blurfing about how PS2 will be better than Halo because it's more people and logistics etc.

It's a design decision, they wanted Halo to be a tournament shooter, not an MMO.

It's disingenuous that you represent these as the same genre.

Fable isn't meant to be WoW.

You're just attention whoring because it's a PC game.

PS - The MMO's I'm mentioning are called Destiny and Defiance

Who cares about AAA? You would of course if you could actually use it as ammo............Duh?

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="WarTornRuston"] You lost about 4 pages back nimrod.. You're just to stupid to realize it.WarTornRuston

Sure I am. And you must be right, you're the only real gamer on this forum.

You are the only gamer here, you obviously know best! Your crystal ball sees all oh mighty gamer.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]

Is # of players what makes a good game?

There will be an MMOFPS on 360 later this year, and one on PS3 the next.

It's not a "PC exclusive feat" it's a design decision.

Fanboyism for the lose.

Planetside is nothing special, I already played it.

Only thing fun was being an ANT driver, that was a hoot.

ZombieKiller7

What's the MMOFPS on the 360, and the PS3? Dust 514 has persistence but is not an MMO as the rounds are still match-based. It's an MMO like World of Tanks.

Have i been arguing along the lines of # of players? I'm looking through my posts here, I really am not. If we were going pure number of players then EVE Online wins in a heartbeat.

You were hurf blurfing about how PS2 will be better than Halo because it's more people and logistics etc.

It's a design decision, they wanted Halo to be a tournament shooter, not an MMO.

It's disingenuous that you represent these as the same genre.

Fable isn't meant to be WoW.

You're just attention whoring because it's a PC game.

PS - The MMO's I'm mentioning are called Destiny and Defiance

I don't give one flying crap about what platform it's on. You all just assume that.

So you think comparing a MMOFPS with a "traditional" FPS is valid, eh?

So you think comparing a MMOFPS with a "traditional" FPS is valid, eh?

nameless12345

So you think comparing a MMOFPS with a "traditional" FPS is valid, eh?

nameless12345

Only when the traditional FPS is a console game.

You'll never see a "Planetside 2 vs CSS" thread, you'll just get laughed out of the forum.

These people are so transparent.

The raw desperation and jealousy.

For me personally, PS2 is more interesting than Halo.

But Halo 4 will crush PS2 in sales.

How do I know?

Because Halo 3 crushed PS1 in sales. And PS1 had more people and higher graphics and persistance and yada yada.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="WarTornRuston"] You lost about 4 pages back nimrod.. You're just to stupid to realize it.WarTornRuston

Sure I am. And you must be right, you're the only real gamer on this forum.

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

So you think comparing a MMOFPS with a "traditional" FPS is valid, eh?

ZombieKiller7

Only when the traditional FPS is a console game.

You'll never see a "Planetside 2 vs CSS" thread, you'll just get laughed out of the forum.

These people are so transparent.

The raw desperation and jealousy.

For me personally, PS2 is more interesting than Halo.

But Halo 4 will crush PS2 in sales.

How do I know?

Because Halo 3 crushed PS1 in sales. And PS1 had more people and higher graphics and persistance and yada yada.

Who cares about AAA? You would of course if you could actually use it as ammo............Duh?

WarTornRuston

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

So you think comparing a MMOFPS with a "traditional" FPS is valid, eh?

ZombieKiller7

Only when the traditional FPS is a console game.

You'll never see a "Planetside 2 vs CSS" thread, you'll just get laughed out of the forum.

These people are so transparent.

The raw desperation and jealousy.

For me personally, PS2 is more interesting than Halo.

But Halo 4 will crush PS2 in sales.

How do I know?

Because Halo 3 crushed PS1 in sales. And PS1 had more people and higher graphics and persistance and yada yada.

Probably the closest you've gotten to making a good topic man. Keep going!

[QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

So you think comparing a MMOFPS with a "traditional" FPS is valid, eh?

Zlychop

Only when the traditional FPS is a console game.

You'll never see a "Planetside 2 vs CSS" thread, you'll just get laughed out of the forum.

These people are so transparent.

The raw desperation and jealousy.

For me personally, PS2 is more interesting than Halo.

But Halo 4 will crush PS2 in sales.

How do I know?

Because Halo 3 crushed PS1 in sales. And PS1 had more people and higher graphics and persistance and yada yada.

No, it just has an MMO gimmick to make people think it's good.

"We have more people shooting at each other! Come here!"

Just like Eve

"We have 50,000 players!" (who all have their thumb up their ass mining or ratting or camping gates)

Hype but inside is hollow.

[QUOTE="Zlychop"][QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]

Only when the traditional FPS is a console game.

You'll never see a "Planetside 2 vs CSS" thread, you'll just get laughed out of the forum.

These people are so transparent.

The raw desperation and jealousy.

For me personally, PS2 is more interesting than Halo.

But Halo 4 will crush PS2 in sales.

How do I know?

Because Halo 3 crushed PS1 in sales. And PS1 had more people and higher graphics and persistance and yada yada.

ZombieKiller7

No, it just has an MMO gimmick to make people think it's good.

"We have more people shooting at each other! Come here!"

Just like Eve

"We have 50,000 players!" (who all have their thumb up their ass mining or ratting or camping gates)

Hype but inside is hollow.

You really don't know what kind of game this really is, to compare to EVE is laughable.

[QUOTE="Zlychop"][QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]

Only when the traditional FPS is a console game.

You'll never see a "Planetside 2 vs CSS" thread, you'll just get laughed out of the forum.

These people are so transparent.

The raw desperation and jealousy.

For me personally, PS2 is more interesting than Halo.

But Halo 4 will crush PS2 in sales.

How do I know?

Because Halo 3 crushed PS1 in sales. And PS1 had more people and higher graphics and persistance and yada yada.

ZombieKiller7

No, it just has an MMO gimmick to make people think it's good.

"We have more people shooting at each other! Come here!"

Just like Eve

"We have 50,000 players!" (who all have their thumb up their ass mining or ratting or camping gates)

Hype but inside is hollow.

[QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]

[QUOTE="Zlychop"] PS2 is f2p and unlike Halo, Planetside doesn't have a multi million marketing campaigned shoved in peoples face to make them think a game is good.Zlychop

No, it just has an MMO gimmick to make people think it's good.

"We have more people shooting at each other! Come here!"

Just like Eve

"We have 50,000 players!" (who all have their thumb up their ass mining or ratting or camping gates)

Hype but inside is hollow.

You really don't know what kind of game this really is, to compare to EVE is laughable.

In both cases the # of players is a gimmick.

Just like WoW.

How many people do you instance with? 4 other people.

So the game can easily be co-op.

But no, we all gotta hang around Stormwind together, that makes it exciting, yaaay.

Same with Planetside.

Same with Eve.

These would all be VASTLY better games if they were smaller. VASTLY better.

But they gotta leech $15/month from you and they can't do that with a co-op mode can they.

[QUOTE="Zlychop"]

[QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]

No, it just has an MMO gimmick to make people think it's good.

"We have more people shooting at each other! Come here!"

Just like Eve

"We have 50,000 players!" (who all have their thumb up their ass mining or ratting or camping gates)

Hype but inside is hollow.

ZombieKiller7

You really don't know what kind of game this really is, to compare to EVE is laughable.

In both cases the # of players is a gimmick.

Just like WoW.

How many people do you instance with? 4 other people.

So the game can easily be co-op.

But no, we all gotta hang around Stormwind together, that makes it exciting, yaaay.

Same with Planetside.

Same with Eve.

These would all be VASTLY better games if they were smaller. VASTLY better.

But they gotta leech $15/month from you and they can't do that with a co-op mode can they.

What do you not understand, Planetside 2 is Free 2 PLAY and each region has 666 players on opposing sides which means 666 vs 666 vs 666 all in the SAME WORLD meaning you have to engage in combat with them.

[QUOTE="MercenaryMafia"]No.Jankarcop

Name one thing about Halo4's MP that is superior to PlanetSide2. Not the shooting, not the maps, not the gfx, now the player variablility (many to few), not the persistant battle, not the vehicles, not the weapons,....

This probably goes for most PC FPS as well when compared to halo, it just isn't on the same league.

Nice opinions you got there sir, surely you have played both to see which is better?