Reason number six zillion why PC gaming rules

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]And then of course, no matter what console you buy, you pay nearly TWICE the price for a new game if you get it on a console as opposed to getting it on the PC.xsubtownerx
Um.. what? Or better yet, "lulwut"? Double the price? Where? How? Who? Looks about the same to me. - I guess I could also mention that PC games have zero resell value. - Of course you can throw in steam prices, but for people who like to collect games (like me), a digital file is the equivalent to dust. Worthless in the long run.

So a box and a disk are worth more to you than the actual game. I see.

Avatar image for DraugenCP
DraugenCP

8486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 69

User Lists: 0

#102 DraugenCP
Member since 2006 • 8486 Posts

+ Nintendo. Over-priced console. Over-priced games. Releasing new add-ons for the Wii Mote to make it do the things it was supposed to do in the first place. Weak online support.Ninja-Hippo

No. New games are around €40-50, which is actually cheaper than they were in the N64 era (at least here).

Avatar image for xsubtownerx
xsubtownerx

10705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#103 xsubtownerx
Member since 2007 • 10705 Posts

[QUOTE="xsubtownerx"][QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]And then of course, no matter what console you buy, you pay nearly TWICE the price for a new game if you get it on a console as opposed to getting it on the PC.Hexagon_777

Um.. what? Or better yet, "lulwut"? Double the price? Where? How? Who? Looks about the same to me. - I guess I could also mention that PC games have zero resell value. - Of course you can throw in steam prices, but for people who like to collect games (like me), a digital file is the equivalent to dust. Worthless in the long run.

So a box and a disk are worth more to you than the actual game. I see.

Of course not. I buy games that I love.
Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] Why does everyone say this? You know you can hook up a PC to a HDTV, I really don't see how you couldn't considering it's been beaten over your consolite heads forever now. Almost all video cards made come with HDMI inputs now, you don't even need separate wires for the speakers, because the vid cards have built in sound.Mystic-G

Ugh. The cult of hardware strikes again. There's a huge difference between "plug in a HDMI cable here and here, and it'll work" and "designed to be operated start to finish from a couch with a gamepad."

Did I just blow your mind?

Nope. ****c PC gamer move though, assuming that I don't know about a DVI-HDMI cable instead of actually bothering to read my post and reply to its main point. In fact, everyone who's responded so far has missed the point and focused solely on the interconnecting hardware, completely ignoring the user interface implications that I was talking about. Truly, the cult of hardware strikes again.

Avatar image for Dataleak
Dataleak

1737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 Dataleak
Member since 2010 • 1737 Posts

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"]Ugh. The cult of hardware strikes again. There's a huge difference between "plug in a HDMI cable here and here, and it'll work" and "designed to be operated start to finish from a couch with a gamepad."lowe0

Did I just blow your mind?

Nope. ****c PC gamer move though, assuming that I don't know about a DVI-HDMI cable instead of actually bothering to read my post and reply to its main point. In fact, everyone who's responded so far has missed the point and focused solely on the interconnecting hardware, completely ignoring the user interface implications that I was talking about. Truly, the cult of hardware strikes again.

My brothers been using the setup for over a 3 months now, and he's never came to me reporting any problems. It seems like people are afraid of learning something these days. If you find a problem, you google it. It's not hard. Reading for 10 minutes isn't going to kill you. :roll:

Avatar image for AlphaJC
AlphaJC

712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 AlphaJC
Member since 2010 • 712 Posts

Your forgot that PC gamers have to put up with drm.alexside1

DRM is only for 2 games dude the rest is fine.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#107 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]To make my PC work with my HDTV, i plugged an HDMI cable into the back of it, and then plugged the other end into my TV.Teufelhuhn



If you want to play games on your TV, typically you also need to configure your display settings so that you have the proper resolution and also so that the TV is the primary display. You may also need to adjust overscan settings on your TV and in your display configuration (ATI cards are particularly annoying with this). Then if you want audio, you need to either have to connect the video card to your mother board's audio output port (if you have one) or you need to configure the audio driver provided by the graphics card.

Not like any of this is impossible, but it's annoying. PC gaming is often filled with a lot of these little "gotchas", and depending on the person they might easy to overlook or they might be a dealbreaker.

I'm not sure if this is a windows 7 feature or what but i literally just plugged my computer into the TV, pressed the source button on my TV remote 'til it got to HDMI and there was my PC running on my TV just fine.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#109 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]

And then of course, no matter what console you buy, you pay nearly TWICE the price for a new game if you get it on a console as opposed to getting it on the PC.

xsubtownerx

Um.. what? Or better yet, "lulwut"? Double the price? Where? How? Who? Looks about the same to me. - I guess I could also mention that PC games have zero resell value. - Of course you can throw in steam prices, but for people who like to collect games (like me), a digital file is the equivalent to dust. Worthless in the long run.

I dont know what the deal is in the states, but a new PC game in the UK is £24.99 - a new console game is £39.99-£44.99 Further, you cant just ignore Steam altogether. I've played some of the best games of this gen and got them off steam for ten bucks.

Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts

Reading for 10 minutes isn't going to kill you. :roll:Dataleak
Well clearly... they read plenty enough in SW and debating. 360 and PS3 may have UI built for gamepads but PCs can also do millions of more things than consoles and the things they do have in common, PC clearly does a better job at sooooo.... yea. I guess a little give and take there. ;)

Avatar image for stiggy321
stiggy321

609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 stiggy321
Member since 2009 • 609 Posts

...I built my gaming PC this year for 500 dollars.

Edit: And that was with a bluray drive(What a waste) and all peripherals.

ritz2
No it wasn't. You either spent more than 500 dollars, it was used, or it's not a "gaming PC." And what games are you buying new that cost 30 dollars TC? I think Splinter Cell is $60... on PC. [QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]A 4000 $ console with upgrades every 15 days? No thanks. And I've played Crysis at a friend and it didn't even look that good. UC2 is graphics king.

Huh it's been 6 months for me. And 4,000 dollars. I spent about 350 to 400. Cheaper than when a PS3 initially launced

You spent 350 on your brand new, gaming PC huh? Or you mean just the upgrade? Why do you guys lie like this?
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#112 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
He obviously means just the upgrade. Why would you spend money on stuff you dont need? :|
Avatar image for forza420
forza420

1225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 forza420
Member since 2010 • 1225 Posts
yes PC Gaming does Rule. but i cant live without Console Gaming :P
Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#114 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

yes PC Gaming does Rule. but i cant live without Console Gaming :Pforza420

:P

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

I'm not sure if this is a windows 7 feature or what but i literally just plugged my computer into the TV, pressed the source button on my TV remote 'til it got to HDMI and there was my PC running on my TV just fine.

Ninja-Hippo



Some drivers will default to cloning the primary display when the secondary is detected. Cloning is okay if both displays are the same resolution, otherwise you'll end up with one monitor not displaying its native resolution (or worse, both will drop down to the highest common resolution). Some laptops with HDMI ports will clone when the laptop is open and then switch to the TV as the primary display when the lid is closed, which is nice.

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

I dont know what the deal is in the states, but a new PC game in the UK is £24.99 - a new console game is £39.99-£44.99 Further, you cant just ignore Steam altogether. I've played some of the best games of this gen and got them off steam for ten bucks.

Ninja-Hippo



Here most new console games are $60, and the PC versions are $50. $50 is also usually the pricepoint for new PC exclusives like Crysis, STALKER, C&C, etc. Recently a few PC games have appeared at $60, notably MW2 and Ubisoft games. For new games Steam will always have the same price as retail, and then later on most of them will drop pretty quickly to the $20-30 range. Unless of course you're talking about Call of Duty games, in which case it takes 2 years for them to drop in price. :P

Avatar image for GramDubs
GramDubs

636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 GramDubs
Member since 2010 • 636 Posts

i didnt read all of this but the pc for gaming is BORING

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"][QUOTE="xsubtownerx"] Um.. what? Or better yet, "lulwut"? Double the price? Where? How? Who? Looks about the same to me. - I guess I could also mention that PC games have zero resell value. - Of course you can throw in steam prices, but for people who like to collect games (like me), a digital file is the equivalent to dust. Worthless in the long run.xsubtownerx
So a box and a disk are worth more to you than the actual game. I see.

Of course not. I buy games that I love.

That's good then. I just find it extremely odd when I see fellow gamers pledging to give up gaming when digital distribution takes over simply because they cannot collect game boxes anymore. I may sound melodramatic here but it does sadden me to an extent.

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

[QUOTE="Dataleak"]Reading for 10 minutes isn't going to kill you. :roll:Mystic-G

Well clearly... they read plenty enough in SW and debating. 360 and PS3 may have UI built for gamepads but PCs can also do millions of more things than consoles and the things they do have in common, PC clearly does a better job at sooooo.... yea. I guess a little give and take there. ;)

And here's the other half of the PC gamer's favorite tactic I was talking about... when it turns out that they do know the basic PC fact that you think they don't know, awkwardly avoid the subject. Stuff like this is why I'm ashamed to admit I was ever a PC gamer. Anyway, back on topic, a good example of what I'm talking about is the XMB. It's designed to be operated solely using the dpd, mapping categories to a single axis and selections to the other axis. Such a UI would be limiting for a Windows application, but it's perfect for a console. Hell, if you want another example, look at XMB vs. Wii's UI - the input device dictates the UI, as the Wii's pointer calls for an entirely different design, a series of large point-and-click targets.
Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

[QUOTE="Dataleak"]Reading for 10 minutes isn't going to kill you. :roll:lowe0

Well clearly... they read plenty enough in SW and debating. 360 and PS3 may have UI built for gamepads but PCs can also do millions of more things than consoles and the things they do have in common, PC clearly does a better job at sooooo.... yea. I guess a little give and take there. ;)

And here's the other half of the PC gamer's favorite tactic I was talking about... when it turns out that they do know the basic PC fact that you think they don't know, awkwardly avoid the subject. Stuff like this is why I'm ashamed to admit I was ever a PC gamer. Anyway, back on topic, a good example of what I'm talking about is the XMB. It's designed to be operated solely using the dpd, mapping categories to a single axis and selections to the other axis. Such a UI would be limiting for a Windows application, but it's perfect for a console. Hell, if you want another example, look at XMB vs. Wii's UI - the input device dictates the UI, as the Wii's pointer calls for an entirely different design, a series of large point-and-click targets.

Ok.. and? What's the point of you saying all this besides clearly acting superior. It makes little difference, PCs can still be used on TV with a little know-how. But I guess that's clearly too much if you don't care to do it. That said, many PC games support gamepads.

Avatar image for Brownesque
Brownesque

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 Brownesque
Member since 2005 • 5660 Posts
OP: excellent points that aren't made enough. As I said in the PS3 Linux thread, do yourselves a favor and actually read the PS3's ToU. It's absolutely psychotic. I have owned every Sony home console and I own a PSP-1000 for god's sakes, and you can basically double that for another member of my family that's lived the same way. I've been a very loyal customer of Sony products, but frankly, what I saw in the ToU contrasted with Sony's "open network" image and demonstrated that even the leeway they give you is entirely out of the goodness of their hearts. If they thought it would help them gain leverage in the market, they would close YOUR console down tighter than a ****** *** ****.
Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="Mystic-G"] Well clearly... they read plenty enough in SW and debating. 360 and PS3 may have UI built for gamepads but PCs can also do millions of more things than consoles and the things they do have in common, PC clearly does a better job at sooooo.... yea. I guess a little give and take there. ;)

Mystic-G

And here's the other half of the PC gamer's favorite tactic I was talking about... when it turns out that they do know the basic PC fact that you think they don't know, awkwardly avoid the subject. Stuff like this is why I'm ashamed to admit I was ever a PC gamer. Anyway, back on topic, a good example of what I'm talking about is the XMB. It's designed to be operated solely using the dpd, mapping categories to a single axis and selections to the other axis. Such a UI would be limiting for a Windows application, but it's perfect for a console. Hell, if you want another example, look at XMB vs. Wii's UI - the input device dictates the UI, as the Wii's pointer calls for an entirely different design, a series of large point-and-click targets.

Ok.. and? What's the point of you saying all this besides clearly acting superior. It makes little difference, PCs can still be used on TV with a little know-how. But I guess that's clearly too much if you don't care to do it. That said, many PC games support gamepads.

My point was that the Windows interface is heavily reliant on a pointing device, that the flexibility of a general-purpose UI necessitates trading off potential usability (a compromise that purpose-built devices aren't affected by), and that PC gamers tend to assume that just because their hardware is capable of something, that it must do so as well as a purpose-built device. But I'm accused of smug superiority by the guy who assumed that I didn't know HDMI and DVI were compatible? That's some ballsy hypocrisy.
Avatar image for RyviusRan
RyviusRan

558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 RyviusRan
Member since 2010 • 558 Posts

People keep making ignorant comments on the price of a gaming PC so let me crush that criticism.

Here is a PC for close to 500 USD that can play Crysis on near max settings at 1680x1050 res.

If you are a college student you can get this set up for 70 USD cheaper since you can grab windows 7 for 30 bucks.

It can play just about every game at max settings with 1680x1050 res.

Plus it can do much more than a console.

Just about every one of you has a computer of their own so you should add in the cost of that computer and your console and then try comparing that to a gaming PC.

Avatar image for Go1D
Go1D

421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 Go1D
Member since 2010 • 421 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]A 4000 $ console with upgrades every 15 days? No thanks. And I've played Crysis at a friend and it didn't even look that good. UC2 is graphics king.93soccer
The first part I can kinda agree with since you do have to update it every few months/years, but the second part just makes you look like a cow

UC2 is snow king, crysis rips it apart along with every other console game in every single other area.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#125 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts

[QUOTE="93soccer"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]A 4000 $ console with upgrades every 15 days? No thanks. And I've played Crysis at a friend and it didn't even look that good. UC2 is graphics king.Go1D

The first part I can kinda agree with since you do have to update it every few months/years, but the second part just makes you look like a cow

UC2 is snow king, crysis rips it apart along with every other console game in every single other area.

cryostasis is the snow king.
Avatar image for RyviusRan
RyviusRan

558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 RyviusRan
Member since 2010 • 558 Posts

[QUOTE="93soccer"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]A 4000 $ console with upgrades every 15 days? No thanks. And I've played Crysis at a friend and it didn't even look that good. UC2 is graphics king.Go1D

The first part I can kinda agree with since you do have to update it every few months/years, but the second part just makes you look like a cow

UC2 is snow king, crysis rips it apart along with every other console game in every single other area.

Gears of War PC beats UC2 plus a lot of other PC games.

Also a PC does not need a lot of maintence work.

I have upgraded my gaming PC in 3 years and probably won't for another year or more.

If I didn't want to play games at near max settings I could use a computer from 5 years or more ago.

Avatar image for Dataleak
Dataleak

1737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 Dataleak
Member since 2010 • 1737 Posts

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"] And here's the other half of the PC gamer's favorite tactic I was talking about... when it turns out that they do know the basic PC fact that you think they don't know, awkwardly avoid the subject. Stuff like this is why I'm ashamed to admit I was ever a PC gamer. Anyway, back on topic, a good example of what I'm talking about is the XMB. It's designed to be operated solely using the dpd, mapping categories to a single axis and selections to the other axis. Such a UI would be limiting for a Windows application, but it's perfect for a console. Hell, if you want another example, look at XMB vs. Wii's UI - the input device dictates the UI, as the Wii's pointer calls for an entirely different design, a series of large point-and-click targets.lowe0

Ok.. and? What's the point of you saying all this besides clearly acting superior. It makes little difference, PCs can still be used on TV with a little know-how. But I guess that's clearly too much if you don't care to do it. That said, many PC games support gamepads.

My point was that the Windows interface is heavily reliant on a pointing device, that the flexibility of a general-purpose UI necessitates trading off potential usability (a compromise that purpose-built devices aren't affected by), and that PC gamers tend to assume that just because their hardware is capable of something, that it must do so as well as a purpose-built device. But I'm accused of smug superiority by the guy who assumed that I didn't know HDMI and DVI were compatible? That's some ballsy hypocrisy.

Then you get yourself a wireless keyboard and mouse? My brother uses his from his sofa, which he uses to navigate Windows. Then he simply puts it down, and picks up his 360 pad when he wants to play games. I really can't see what's so technical about this. :?

Avatar image for stiggy321
stiggy321

609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 stiggy321
Member since 2009 • 609 Posts

People keep making ignorant comments on the price of a gaming PC so let me crush that criticism.

Here is a PC for close to 500 USD that can play Crysis on near max settings at 1680x1050 res.

If you are a college student you can get this set up for 70 USD cheaper since you can grab windows 7 for 30 bucks.

It can play just about every game at max settings with 1680x1050 res.

Plus it can do much more than a console.

Just about every one of you has a computer of their own so you should add in the cost of that computer and your console and then try comparing that to a gaming PC.

RyviusRan

Add shipping and tax and it will cost 600 dollars. Then you take it home, and put everything together yourself. Not every college student can get windows for 30 dollars, and not every college even takes part in that offer. That is a terrible processor, and not enough RAM to run anything when using 64 bit 7. And well, yes. A 256mb 8800gt with a 4 year old AMD processor can "max crysis." It maxes it... at 10 fps. Please stop this. It is ridiculous to argue about PC's that can "max crysis" being less than 500 dollars, let alone 300. It is not possible. I beg of you all... stop.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#129 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts

[QUOTE="RyviusRan"]

People keep making ignorant comments on the price of a gaming PC so let me crush that criticism.

Here is a PC for close to 500 USD that can play Crysis on near max settings at 1680x1050 res.

If you are a college student you can get this set up for 70 USD cheaper since you can grab windows 7 for 30 bucks.

It can play just about every game at max settings with 1680x1050 res.

Plus it can do much more than a console.

Just about every one of you has a computer of their own so you should add in the cost of that computer and your console and then try comparing that to a gaming PC.

stiggy321

Add shipping and tax and it will cost 600 dollars. Then you take it home, and put everything together yourself. Not every college student can get windows for 30 dollars, and not every college even takes part in that offer. That is a terrible processor, and not enough RAM to run anything when using 64 bit 7. And well, yes. A 256mb 8800gt with a 4 year old AMD processor can "max crysis." It maxes it... at 10 fps. Please stop this. It is ridiculous to argue about PC's that can "max crysis" being less than 500 dollars, let alone 300. It is not possible. I beg of you all... stop.

1. newegg doesnt charge tax for most places and you have to pay tax on consoles too, same with shipping. 2. That build includes a copy of window, good observation skills you have 3. That would run crysis on a config tweak equivalent to high with 30+ fps. and easly better than anything a console can do.

Avatar image for Dataleak
Dataleak

1737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 Dataleak
Member since 2010 • 1737 Posts

[QUOTE="RyviusRan"]

People keep making ignorant comments on the price of a gaming PC so let me crush that criticism.

Here is a PC for close to 500 USD that can play Crysis on near max settings at 1680x1050 res.

If you are a college student you can get this set up for 70 USD cheaper since you can grab windows 7 for 30 bucks.

It can play just about every game at max settings with 1680x1050 res.

Plus it can do much more than a console.

Just about every one of you has a computer of their own so you should add in the cost of that computer and your console and then try comparing that to a gaming PC.

stiggy321

Add shipping and tax and it will cost 600 dollars. Then you take it home, and put everything together yourself. Not every college student can get windows for 30 dollars, and not every college even takes part in that offer. That is a terrible processor, and not enough RAM to run anything when using 64 bit 7. And well, yes. A 256mb 8800gt with a 4 year old AMD processor can "max crysis." It maxes it... at 10 fps. Please stop this. It is ridiculous to argue about PC's that can "max crysis" being less than 500 dollars, let alone 300. It is not possible. I beg of you all... stop.

Processors don't make that much of an impact compared to the graphics card. That CPU is easily enough to max games, seeing as my terrible Q8200 2.3ghz maxes out every multiplat, and plays Crysis at a steady 25-30 fps in Crysis maxed (no AA). He might not be maxing Crysis, but with a custom config at higher then 720p resolutions, it'll look tons better then any console game. Plus he'll easily max multiplats, and play pretty much every PC exclusive at close to max settings at 1080p.

The Athlon X2 240 running Crysis.

The Athlon x2 240 running Metro 2033.

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="Mystic-G"] Ok.. and? What's the point of you saying all this besides clearly acting superior. It makes little difference, PCs can still be used on TV with a little know-how. But I guess that's clearly too much if you don't care to do it. That said, many PC games support gamepads.

Dataleak

My point was that the Windows interface is heavily reliant on a pointing device, that the flexibility of a general-purpose UI necessitates trading off potential usability (a compromise that purpose-built devices aren't affected by), and that PC gamers tend to assume that just because their hardware is capable of something, that it must do so as well as a purpose-built device. But I'm accused of smug superiority by the guy who assumed that I didn't know HDMI and DVI were compatible? That's some ballsy hypocrisy.

Then you get yourself a wireless keyboard and mouse? My brother uses his from his sofa, which he uses to navigate Windows. Then he simply puts it down, and picks up his 360 pad when he wants to play games. I really can't see what's so technical about this. :?

LOL: the solution to a software design problem? More hardware. How does a wireless mouse change the fact that a simpler interface dumps a lot of dead weight that's not really needed for playing media and games?
Avatar image for Dataleak
Dataleak

1737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 Dataleak
Member since 2010 • 1737 Posts

[QUOTE="Dataleak"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"] My point was that the Windows interface is heavily reliant on a pointing device, that the flexibility of a general-purpose UI necessitates trading off potential usability (a compromise that purpose-built devices aren't affected by), and that PC gamers tend to assume that just because their hardware is capable of something, that it must do so as well as a purpose-built device. But I'm accused of smug superiority by the guy who assumed that I didn't know HDMI and DVI were compatible? That's some ballsy hypocrisy. lowe0

Then you get yourself a wireless keyboard and mouse? My brother uses his from his sofa, which he uses to navigate Windows. Then he simply puts it down, and picks up his 360 pad when he wants to play games. I really can't see what's so technical about this. :?

LOL: the solution to a software design problem? More hardware. How does a wireless mouse change the fact that a simpler interface dumps a lot of dead weight that's not really needed for playing media and games?

Oh right, because you use your PC without a mouse and keyboard. Honestly, you're making it sound like an inconvenience. :roll:

Avatar image for RyviusRan
RyviusRan

558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 RyviusRan
Member since 2010 • 558 Posts

[QUOTE="RyviusRan"]

People keep making ignorant comments on the price of a gaming PC so let me crush that criticism.

Here is a PC for close to 500 USD that can play Crysis on near max settings at 1680x1050 res.

If you are a college student you can get this set up for 70 USD cheaper since you can grab windows 7 for 30 bucks.

It can play just about every game at max settings with 1680x1050 res.

Plus it can do much more than a console.

Just about every one of you has a computer of their own so you should add in the cost of that computer and your console and then try comparing that to a gaming PC.

stiggy321

Add shipping and tax and it will cost 600 dollars. Then you take it home, and put everything together yourself. Not every college student can get windows for 30 dollars, and not every college even takes part in that offer. That is a terrible processor, and not enough RAM to run anything when using 64 bit 7. And well, yes. A 256mb 8800gt with a 4 year old AMD processor can "max crysis." It maxes it... at 10 fps. Please stop this. It is ridiculous to argue about PC's that can "max crysis" being less than 500 dollars, let alone 300. It is not possible. I beg of you all... stop.

You don't know anything. No tax and shipping is like 30 USD and it is still many times more powerful than a console.

And that is enough RAM. I have a computer similar and I can nearly max out Crysis.

I have about the same processor too.

I get around 23 FPS on max in Crysis which is plenty smooth in a game like that but I use a modded config that looks like max settings but gives around 30 fps.

You need to go learn more about computers because you clearly don't have a clue.

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="Dataleak"]

Then you get yourself a wireless keyboard and mouse? My brother uses his from his sofa, which he uses to navigate Windows. Then he simply puts it down, and picks up his 360 pad when he wants to play games. I really can't see what's so technical about this. :?

Dataleak

LOL: the solution to a software design problem? More hardware. How does a wireless mouse change the fact that a simpler interface dumps a lot of dead weight that's not really needed for playing media and games?

Oh right, because you use your PC without a mouse and keyboard. Honestly, you're making it sound like an inconvenience. :roll:

YES! That's exactly what I'm saying! Using a mouse from a couch is "inconvenient" when a more suitable UI exists. Which is why I don't have my PC hooked up to my TV, because it requires a keyboard and mouse.
Avatar image for RyviusRan
RyviusRan

558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 RyviusRan
Member since 2010 • 558 Posts

[QUOTE="Dataleak"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"] LOL: the solution to a software design problem? More hardware. How does a wireless mouse change the fact that a simpler interface dumps a lot of dead weight that's not really needed for playing media and games? lowe0

Oh right, because you use your PC without a mouse and keyboard. Honestly, you're making it sound like an inconvenience. :roll:

YES! That's exactly what I'm saying! Using a mouse from a couch is "inconvenient" when a more suitable UI exists. Which is why I don't have my PC hooked up to my TV, because it requires a keyboard and mouse.

I am laying in bed surfing the web and playing halo just fine while using a laptop and mouse.

Avatar image for Dataleak
Dataleak

1737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 Dataleak
Member since 2010 • 1737 Posts

[QUOTE="Dataleak"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"] LOL: the solution to a software design problem? More hardware. How does a wireless mouse change the fact that a simpler interface dumps a lot of dead weight that's not really needed for playing media and games? lowe0

Oh right, because you use your PC without a mouse and keyboard. Honestly, you're making it sound like an inconvenience. :roll:

YES! That's exactly what I'm saying! Using a mouse from a couch is "inconvenient" when a more suitable UI exists. Which is why I don't have my PC hooked up to my TV, because it requires a keyboard and mouse.

Well that seems to be preference. My brothers fine with browsing the web from his couch, instead of "hunched infront of a desk, staring at a tiny monitor". Contradiction much? :P

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="Dataleak"]

Oh right, because you use your PC without a mouse and keyboard. Honestly, you're making it sound like an inconvenience. :roll:

Dataleak

YES! That's exactly what I'm saying! Using a mouse from a couch is "inconvenient" when a more suitable UI exists. Which is why I don't have my PC hooked up to my TV, because it requires a keyboard and mouse.

Well that seems to be preference. My brothers fine with browser the web from his couch, instead of "hunched infront of a desk, staring at a tiny monitor". Contradiction much? :P

Interesting quote. Could you please find the post where I said it?
Avatar image for Dataleak
Dataleak

1737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 Dataleak
Member since 2010 • 1737 Posts

[QUOTE="Dataleak"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"] YES! That's exactly what I'm saying! Using a mouse from a couch is "inconvenient" when a more suitable UI exists. Which is why I don't have my PC hooked up to my TV, because it requires a keyboard and mouse.lowe0

Well that seems to be preference. My brothers fine with browser the web from his couch, instead of "hunched infront of a desk, staring at a tiny monitor". Contradiction much? :P

Interesting quote. Could you please find the post where I said it?

Damnit.. Ok, you never said it personally, but it's a common complaint about PC gaming.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0

4928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#139 deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
Member since 2009 • 4928 Posts

[QUOTE="RyviusRan"]

People keep making ignorant comments on the price of a gaming PC so let me crush that criticism.

Here is a PC for close to 500 USD that can play Crysis on near max settings at 1680x1050 res.

If you are a college student you can get this set up for 70 USD cheaper since you can grab windows 7 for 30 bucks.

It can play just about every game at max settings with 1680x1050 res.

Plus it can do much more than a console.

Just about every one of you has a computer of their own so you should add in the cost of that computer and your console and then try comparing that to a gaming PC.

stiggy321

Add shipping and tax and it will cost 600 dollars. Then you take it home, and put everything together yourself. Not every college student can get windows for 30 dollars, and not every college even takes part in that offer. That is a terrible processor, and not enough RAM to run anything when using 64 bit 7. And well, yes. A 256mb 8800gt with a 4 year old AMD processor can "max crysis." It maxes it... at 10 fps. Please stop this. It is ridiculous to argue about PC's that can "max crysis" being less than 500 dollars, let alone 300. It is not possible. I beg of you all... stop.

+++++++1 MY pc, gtx285ocx, e8400 dual core, 4 gigs of ram, my pc is better then the one you just listed, I got my graphics card last year and it is still $400, I cannot maxx crysis, I can run it on high but still suffer major slow downs at parts of the game.

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#140 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

[QUOTE="stiggy321"]

[QUOTE="RyviusRan"]

People keep making ignorant comments on the price of a gaming PC so let me crush that criticism.

Here is a PC for close to 500 USD that can play Crysis on near max settings at 1680x1050 res.

If you are a college student you can get this set up for 70 USD cheaper since you can grab windows 7 for 30 bucks.

It can play just about every game at max settings with 1680x1050 res.

Plus it can do much more than a console.

Just about every one of you has a computer of their own so you should add in the cost of that computer and your console and then try comparing that to a gaming PC.

Advid-Gamer

Add shipping and tax and it will cost 600 dollars. Then you take it home, and put everything together yourself. Not every college student can get windows for 30 dollars, and not every college even takes part in that offer. That is a terrible processor, and not enough RAM to run anything when using 64 bit 7. And well, yes. A 256mb 8800gt with a 4 year old AMD processor can "max crysis." It maxes it... at 10 fps. Please stop this. It is ridiculous to argue about PC's that can "max crysis" being less than 500 dollars, let alone 300. It is not possible. I beg of you all... stop.

+++++++1 MY pc bfggtx285ocx, e8400 dual core, gigs of ram, my pc is better then the one you just listed, I got my graphics v=card last year and it is still $400, I cannot maxx crysis, I can run it on high but not at 60 fps.

60 fps? You are expecting a bit too much. Crysis is a 30 fps game.

Avatar image for Dataleak
Dataleak

1737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 Dataleak
Member since 2010 • 1737 Posts

[QUOTE="Advid-Gamer"]

[QUOTE="stiggy321"] Add shipping and tax and it will cost 600 dollars. Then you take it home, and put everything together yourself. Not every college student can get windows for 30 dollars, and not every college even takes part in that offer. That is a terrible processor, and not enough RAM to run anything when using 64 bit 7. And well, yes. A 256mb 8800gt with a 4 year old AMD processor can "max crysis." It maxes it... at 10 fps. Please stop this. It is ridiculous to argue about PC's that can "max crysis" being less than 500 dollars, let alone 300. It is not possible. I beg of you all... stop.

GeneralShowzer

+++++++1 MY pc bfggtx285ocx, e8400 dual core, gigs of ram, my pc is better then the one you just listed, I got my graphics v=card last year and it is still $400, I cannot maxx crysis, I can run it on high but not at 60 fps.

60 fps? You are expecting a bit too much. Crysis is a 30 fps game.

Yup. 30fps + motionblur is almost silky smooth... for Crysis. :lol:

Avatar image for deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0

4928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#142 deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
Member since 2009 • 4928 Posts

[QUOTE="Advid-Gamer"]

[QUOTE="stiggy321"] Add shipping and tax and it will cost 600 dollars. Then you take it home, and put everything together yourself. Not every college student can get windows for 30 dollars, and not every college even takes part in that offer. That is a terrible processor, and not enough RAM to run anything when using 64 bit 7. And well, yes. A 256mb 8800gt with a 4 year old AMD processor can "max crysis." It maxes it... at 10 fps. Please stop this. It is ridiculous to argue about PC's that can "max crysis" being less than 500 dollars, let alone 300. It is not possible. I beg of you all... stop.

GeneralShowzer

+++++++1 MY pc bfggtx285ocx, e8400 dual core, gigs of ram, my pc is better then the one you just listed, I got my graphics v=card last year and it is still $400, I cannot maxx crysis, I can run it on high but not at 60 fps.

60 fps? You are expecting a bit too much. Crysis is a 30 fps game.

I am not expecting anything, I run crysis fine, my point was only to debunk the cheap ass pc can max crysis post. Crysis does not need 60 fps, atleast 40 is good tho.
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#143 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]

[QUOTE="Advid-Gamer"] +++++++1 MY pc bfggtx285ocx, e8400 dual core, gigs of ram, my pc is better then the one you just listed, I got my graphics v=card last year and it is still $400, I cannot maxx crysis, I can run it on high but not at 60 fps.

Dataleak

60 fps? You are expecting a bit too much. Crysis is a 30 fps game.

Yup. 30fps + motionblur is almost silky smooth... for Crysis. :lol:

Even 20-25 looks smooth.
Avatar image for deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0

4928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#144 deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
Member since 2009 • 4928 Posts
[QUOTE="Dataleak"]

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] 60 fps? You are expecting a bit too much. Crysis is a 30 fps game.

GeneralShowzer

Yup. 30fps + motionblur is almost silky smooth... for Crysis. :lol:

Even 20-25 looks smooth.

not really.
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#145 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="Dataleak"]

Yup. 30fps + motionblur is almost silky smooth... for Crysis. :lol:

Advid-Gamer

Even 20-25 looks smooth.

not really.

It does, I've tried a lot of different stuff. It's really unplayable below 20.

Avatar image for RyviusRan
RyviusRan

558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 RyviusRan
Member since 2010 • 558 Posts

[QUOTE="stiggy321"]

[QUOTE="RyviusRan"]

People keep making ignorant comments on the price of a gaming PC so let me crush that criticism.

Here is a PC for close to 500 USD that can play Crysis on near max settings at 1680x1050 res.

If you are a college student you can get this set up for 70 USD cheaper since you can grab windows 7 for 30 bucks.

It can play just about every game at max settings with 1680x1050 res.

Plus it can do much more than a console.

Just about every one of you has a computer of their own so you should add in the cost of that computer and your console and then try comparing that to a gaming PC.

Advid-Gamer

Add shipping and tax and it will cost 600 dollars. Then you take it home, and put everything together yourself. Not every college student can get windows for 30 dollars, and not every college even takes part in that offer. That is a terrible processor, and not enough RAM to run anything when using 64 bit 7. And well, yes. A 256mb 8800gt with a 4 year old AMD processor can "max crysis." It maxes it... at 10 fps. Please stop this. It is ridiculous to argue about PC's that can "max crysis" being less than 500 dollars, let alone 300. It is not possible. I beg of you all... stop.

+++++++1 MY pc, gtx285ocx, e8400 dual core, 4 gigs of ram, my pc is better then the one you just listed, I got my graphics card last year and it is still $400, I cannot maxx crysis, I can run it on high but still suffer major slow downs at parts of the game.

I never said I run it at 60 FPS I even tell you what I run it at and it runs smoothly.

Avatar image for RyviusRan
RyviusRan

558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 RyviusRan
Member since 2010 • 558 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]

[QUOTE="Advid-Gamer"] +++++++1 MY pc bfggtx285ocx, e8400 dual core, gigs of ram, my pc is better then the one you just listed, I got my graphics v=card last year and it is still $400, I cannot maxx crysis, I can run it on high but not at 60 fps.

Advid-Gamer

60 fps? You are expecting a bit too much. Crysis is a 30 fps game.

I am not expecting anything, I run crysis fine, my point was only to debunk the cheap ass pc can max crysis post. Crysis does not need 60 fps, atleast 40 is good tho.

You debunked nothing since my PC can run crysis on near max setting at 1680x1050 res and it can run it smoothly.

20-25 fps is still smooth and with the config mod it looks even better than max at times and runs at 25-30 fps.

Crysis is one of those games that doesn't need a high frame rate to be smooth.

Just search for 8800gt crysis vidz and you will see it can run at near max settings just fine.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0

4928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#148 deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
Member since 2009 • 4928 Posts

[QUOTE="Advid-Gamer"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] 60 fps? You are expecting a bit too much. Crysis is a 30 fps game.

RyviusRan

I am not expecting anything, I run crysis fine, my point was only to debunk the cheap ass pc can max crysis post. Crysis does not need 60 fps, atleast 40 is good tho.

You debunked nothing since my PC can run crysis on near max setting at 1680x1050 res and it can run it smoothly.

20-25 fps is still smooth and with the config mod it looks even better than max at times and runs at 25-30 fps.

Crysis is one of those games that doesn't need a high frame rate to be smooth.

Just search for 8800gt crysis vidz and you will see it can run at near max settings just fine.

ok, thats fine, I run my pc at 1920/1080 so I dont know about 1650/1050 from experience I guess it would up the Framerate alittle, but if that low of a framerate is ok with pc gamers, why give the consoles so much crap for there 30fps in most games? Whats near max settings? Im not really buying it, because even with my graphics card which is a hell of alot better then the one you listed very high is not even a option for me with the textures.

Avatar image for -Feath-
-Feath-

1452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#149 -Feath-
Member since 2005 • 1452 Posts
ok, thats fine, I run my pc at 1920/1080 so I dont know about 1650/1050 from experience I guess it would up the Framerate alittle, but if that low of a framerate is ok with pc gamers, why give the consoles so much crap for there 30fps in most games? Whats near max settings? Im not really buying itAdvid-Gamer
Going down to 1680x1050 would give more than "a little" frame rate boost. As for 'giving crap', 1680x1050 is still a lot larger than the consoles render at (they are pretty much up-scaled across the board from resolutions just under 720p, or on 720p itself. So it would be understandable, if a bit gratuitous. Near max settings is usually just a mixture of high/very high. Doesn't seem that far fetched to me, I haven't upgraded my rig since early 2008 and I can still max anything (and even then, the upgrade was only because the component being replaced broke anyway).
Avatar image for deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0

4928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#150 deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
Member since 2009 • 4928 Posts

[QUOTE="Advid-Gamer"]ok, thats fine, I run my pc at 1920/1080 so I dont know about 1650/1050 from experience I guess it would up the Framerate alittle, but if that low of a framerate is ok with pc gamers, why give the consoles so much crap for there 30fps in most games? Whats near max settings? Im not really buying it-Feath-
Going down to 1680x1050 would give more than "a little" frame rate boost. As for 'giving crap', 1680x1050 is still a lot larger than the consoles render at (they are pretty much up-scaled across the board from resolutions just under 720p, or on 720p itself. So it would be understandable, if a bit gratuitous. Near max settings is usually just a mixture of high/very high. Doesn't seem that far fetched to me, I haven't upgraded my rig since early 2008 and I can still max anything (and even then, the upgrade was only because the component being replaced broke anyway).

Well then no way in hell can that pc run it near max with your description. I run it on high when I play at 2xaa, some times no aa. Dont see how his build could do that.Also other then a few games there is no need to upgrade, what do you expect they are almost all ports, if they were ported better they would be even easier to run.