Rumor.Shadow of Mordor 720p 30FPS on XBO.?

Once again hypocrite do that on lemmings threads and stop single out cows,we need as many as they are make if you don't like it no one is forcing you to read them,just go to the xbox room were there is no comparison.

Exactly but some how because it is me making the thread it doesn't matter all they see is this.

Tormentos thread.

About the xbox one been 720p in a game.

= Troll thread..hahaha

Ryse look like that because is constricted and enclosed and heavily path guided game,Shadow of mordor is the complete opposite of ryse.

It has Cell?

Come on man even i know 720p 30 FPS is to distant from 1080p 60FPS.

Yeah if the game is 60FPS on xbox one at 720p yeah that could be an engine issue mostly like Fox engine which apparently does defferred lighitng which if true would cause problems with ESRAM,i don't know if they are trying for 60FPS on xbox one,i just don't see the gap been picture now as reality something is not adding up.

Those threads were in retaliation to the countless cow threads claiming PS3 was going to demolish anything on the 360. That every game would ALWAYS look better. Either way it's such a lame excuse to post crap like this.

Cows always playing the victim.

Oh man, look at all these fucks I give

While open world games are heavy, it doens't justify 6GB. Wash Dogs required 3GB of VRAM for ultra textures, but was letter discovered that 2GB would run it, albeit, some degree of stuttering in some configurations. Same fixes were provided latter

Now you're telling me it needs that much just for high settings, with an insane 6GB for ultra? And why not 4 instead? Why would you need 6GB, even if using ultra HD textures?

And like i said, if 3GB are indeed true, than the console versions are using medium texture quality anyway.

No game needs 3GB of video memory to be maxed out at 1080p yet, and while requirements will certanly increase in the future, i don't see anything in SoM that needs to push those same requirements. Still, those are just the textures anyway.

I'm just curious to see the benchmarks before i buy the game

This post ^^ is not more bullsh** because it doesn't have more words on it.

Yeah because the PS2 vs xbox sony fans also stated that the PS2 would demolish the xbox right.?

Xbox fans have used the graphics angle since the PS2 days.

You give enough to come into the thread,write that troll post and hit reply,since all you can do in this forums is that i say you give allot of fucks about it..hahahaaaaaa

Well that is Watchdogs which is not using the same engine as SOM.

This should give you an example,the game would probably run will incur in a severe performance penalty.

Look at the difference from the 7850 1GB vs the 2GB version 33 frames per second on the same PC same CPU same GPU.

There is no way the PS4 is doing 1080p60 stable and the gap between the PS4 and Xbox One isn't so big where one can do 1080p60 and the other can only do 720p30.

Yeah that is what i am pointing,maybe both are 1080p but the PS4 is 60 xbox lock 30,or in the worse case scenario is 60FPS on both while been 720p on xbox one like it was the case with MGS5.

Cool, I'll play the game at 1080p and 60 frames.

i am waiting for digital foundry to point out how inferior the console versions are from the pc version.

If they can still tell the difference ;)

Does the 720p version get a lower score from a higher resolution version?

@tormentos said:

@kingtito said:

Those threads were in retaliation to the countless cow threads claiming PS3 was going to demolish anything on the 360. That every game would ALWAYS look better. Either way it's such a lame excuse to post crap like this.

Cows always playing the victim.

This post ^^ is not more bullsh** because it doesn't have more words on it.

Yeah because the PS2 vs xbox sony fans also stated that the PS2 would demolish the xbox right.?

Xbox fans have used the graphics angle since the PS2 days.

@lostrib said:

Oh man, look at all these fucks I give

You give enough to come into the thread,write that troll post and hit reply,since all you can do in this forums is that i say you give allot of fucks about it..hahahaaaaaa

@deadline-zero0 said:

While open world games are heavy, it doens't justify 6GB. Wash Dogs required 3GB of VRAM for ultra textures, but was letter discovered that 2GB would run it, albeit, some degree of stuttering in some configurations. Same fixes were provided latter

Now you're telling me it needs that much just for high settings, with an insane 6GB for ultra? And why not 4 instead? Why would you need 6GB, even if using ultra HD textures?

And like i said, if 3GB are indeed true, than the console versions are using medium texture quality anyway.

No game needs 3GB of video memory to be maxed out at 1080p yet, and while requirements will certanly increase in the future, i don't see anything in SoM that needs to push those same requirements. Still, those are just the textures anyway.

I'm just curious to see the benchmarks before i buy the game

Well that is Watchdogs which is not using the same engine as SOM.

This should give you an example,the game would probably run will incur in a severe performance penalty.

Look at the difference from the 7850 1GB vs the 2GB version 33 frames per second on the same PC same CPU same GPU.

Like I said El Tormented....always playing the victim. Cows are notorious for this with you leading the pack. Have fun kid.

First LOL at Tormentos thread. Second, just like at the zoo..."Don't feed the animals" it only makes them want to bother you more!! Lastly, as much time as this loser spends looking for ways to bash the X1, the PS4 must not be all that!!!

@tormentos: Ofcourse VRAM usage increased. i expect 4GB to becoem norm for future gens. But like i said, 2GB is still enough today to max games out.

You talked about the number of npcs on screen, which is fair, but what about Unity then? How mcuh si that gonna need?

Look, my issue with this is the 6 gig part. If it was like WD and wanted 3GB for ultra textures, i'd scoff it off. But asking for 6GB of VRAM for a texture jump is a joke.

Which cards actually have 6 gigs anyway? I can only think of few unique models and custom made ones, and ofcourse, the Titan series. But the thing is, the Titans get beaten or matched by the 780 TI OCed, even with the huge amount of memory. There's even 12 GB Titans.

So it's not a matter of better performing cards, but simply more memory. And speaking of Skyrim, if you install tons of texture mods, you're definitely gonna need alot of that.

Point is, 6GB of memory is overkill. Since this isn't reworking the ligthing or shadows display, and since even 4GB is enough for 4K resolution, why such a high amount of it? I betetr be seeing a big improvement.

That's what i don't get. The Evil Within i get, Shit optimization plus ID Tech5. This, i don't know man.

What DX12?? lol!! 2015.

lol, important question is this game needs 3 gb for high texture settings, why

This. From reading this I would guess that it will be like some other games, Crysis 2 comes to mind, where you will have to download an additional texture pack and that is the Ultra setting, thus the Ultra HD moniker.

Tormentos didn't make a bad thread, don't know why everyone is jumping all over him for this. If these setting become reality then yes, the developers are really lazy.

You are the one here playing victim..lol

PS2 gen says high..hahahaha

This isn't a bash thread moron re read first post..lol

DX12 is on xbox since 2001...

Consoles have always have better CPU over head than PC.

Even i agree with you on this one.

Right because PS2 fanboys weren't talking crap prior to XBox launch right? They didn't talk crap the entire gen right?

Keep playing the victim El Tormented.....most kids do.

What crap.?

So you still are a compulsive liar i see.? hahahaaaaaaaaaaaa

The xbox was more powerful than the PS2,and lemmings hyped graphics over the ps2 including multiplatforms.

So yeah since 2001 this has been going so stop been a cry baby and take it like a man lemming.

Still playing the def, dumb and blind cow I see. Go ahead and pretend cows didn't talk shit about the Xbox sales and lack all the games the PS2 got. That's right cows did nothing and never talked bad about any of the consoles until the 360 right? And that was because lems talked 1st right?

You're the still the idiot I see. Keep playing the victim loser.

You have an unhealthy obsession with the Xbone and resolution.

agreed, he should really see a doctor seriously, it can't be healthy?

Not allowed to flame a bullshit rumor and the fool who believes it?

Typical Tormentos.

OOOHH NOOOEEESSS!!!! UNPLAYABLE!!!! Spare me.......I'll play it on PC hahahahahahaha

@tormentos: Have to commend you on not being a hardcore cow about this.

Either way the game looks good, and I already have this along with Forza preordered so tomorrow will be a good day for me after work.

Why are people so mad in this thread? I don't believe this rumor, sure xone is a little weaker but this doesn't make sense.

720p/30fps in almost 2015. What a powerhouse that X1 is.

Xbone is teh weak.

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1877261&postcount=4246

900p on Xbone confirmed tho still uncertain on the framerate, wouldn't be surprised if it's around the 30fps mark. It's rather embarrassing to see the Bone struggles at 900p while PS4 blitz it at 1080p/60.

@tormentos:

Do not care. Picked it up for £20 on PC yesterday, so I'll be playing it at 1080p, 60FPS in a couple hours when it finishes downloading

Having watched a stream of the PS4 on Twitch, it was clearly 30fps. Unless Twitch capped me. Not sure where people are getting 60fps confirmations from.

All i could find was the IGN director quote. lol ign.

But i expected this. 900p on the bone, 1080p on the ps4, 30fps on both, most likely using high pre-sets, with texture quality set back to medium. Though, NeoGaf benchmarks are getting weird. I'm still trying to find out if 2GB can work on high sets, which seems correct, like WD.

I will run the game at 1440p completely maxed with ultra textures.

There was a user running it on a single GTX 970 and with Ultra he only got a 1-2 second stutter around every 40 minutes when loading another area.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=132208286

That is pretty much what happens in an auto save scenario in a lot of games so It won't bug me.

Besides that he gets 60-70 fps at max settings which consoles are not running anywhere near.

Here's his vRAM usage on high.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

And here is his vRAM usage on Ultra

exactly this.. I own one of the new consoles but the fact that you can get it for $20 less on PC and have it run and look better is just too hard to pass up.. I'm getting pretty sick of the console game bull shit.

Yeah, where is everyone getting this 1080p 60fps confirmation on PS4?

Come on, people. Just wait for the official announcement.

You are in the best place for it, in fact. As soon as it's confirmed I'm sure Eddie will run to his computer to write a full article covering this issue

I would pick it on PC to dude...

How is that relevant to the thread.?

900p 30FPS vs 1080p 60 would still be a quite rather large gap,maybe both are aiming for 30 or for 60 one 900p the other 1080p.

http://www.twinstickgaming.com/2014/07/05/shadow-of-mordor-to-run-at-1080p-on-ps4-but-what-about-xbox-one/

Supposedly the game was confirmed to be 1080p 60 FPS for PS4.

1080p 60 vs 900p 30 it to big of a gap.

I read some 2GB card were running high but not 60 FPS or close more like 30 FPS,which is probably a hit to performance from the low memory,like it happen on skyrim on the 7850 1GB.

Where is shadows of mordor $40 so i can buy it,on steam is $50 on amazon as well.

@tormentos: Never would have expected a thread like this from Tormentos. <insert rolling eyes here>

Seriously, posting rumors now?

Oh I'm in Canada, games are 69.99 here where it's 49.99 on steam so it's an easy choice for me.

In terms of this thread.. Yes we know tormento's to be a cow, but there's nothing saying he can't post a rumor.. If there was a rumor going around that the ps4 is running something 900p and 30fps there would be tons of lems posting about it, even if it was just a rumor.

I'm not usually one to support tormento's threads but I don't feel like he was telling us that it IS 100% 720p 30fps, Just letting us know the facts. Honestly it was this thread that got me to buy it on PC and save money so thanks for that I guess lol.

We know now it's 900p and 30fps but if its 1080p and 60fps on the ps4 that kind of jump in performance is just not acceptable as far as I'm concerned.. Microsoft should be a little embarrassed now if games need to be down graded this much to keep details on par with the PS4.. OR these dev's are awful at optimizing the system.. Dunno.

edit: I planned on getting this for the x1 just so everyone knows... I'm a little disappointed in the performance gap here.