This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]Did you say Dog? Oh god no!!SaintWalrusWhat about Dog? I remember some guy who kept trolling SW and had "dog" in his name, mr SaintDogWalrus :P You're probably not him though.
[QUOTE="SaintWalrus"][QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]Did you say Dog? Oh god no!!SaltyMeatballsWhat about Dog? I remember some guy who kept trolling SW and had "dog" in his name, mr SaintDogWalrus :P You're probably not him though. Yeah, you're right I am most definately not that loser. :P
These 2 games are in different leagues, zelda is not Worthy to be compared to Batman AC
Advid-Gamer
Other way around
i was gonna get zelda today but decided to wait and get it later, i have to many other games to play, but batman ac is one of this gens best, skyward sword would have to kick some ass to be as goodTH1Sx1SxSPARTA
Question: If I didn't like Arkham Asylum, would I like Arkham City?
It wasn't the story or anything that I didn't like in AA, it was just the simplistic combat system.
These 2 games are in different leagues, zelda is not Worthy to be compared to Batman AC
Advid-Gamer
Did anyone even bothers by reading the OP...or people just jump after only reading the title :|
[QUOTE="Advid-Gamer"]
These 2 games are in different leagues, zelda is not Worthy to be compared to Batman AC
madsnakehhh
Did anyone even bothers by reading the OP...or people just jump after only reading the title :|
If the two are in different leagues why would he want Zelda when he is given the choice to choose between both.:|
SS is vastly superior, actually. I love Batman and the Arkham games, but SS is just completely amazing imo; can't put it down.
So you actually played Skyward Sword? How was it?I remember the days when Zelda used to rule over all the Action Adventure games of any kind. Those days are long gone. Batman is better.
glez13
[QUOTE="madsnakehhh"]
[QUOTE="Advid-Gamer"]
These 2 games are in different leagues, zelda is not Worthy to be compared to Batman AC
glez13
Did anyone even bothers by reading the OP...or people just jump after only reading the title :|
If the two are in different leagues why would he want Zelda when he is given the choice to choose between both.:|
I reckon that GTAIV might be on a league on its own compared to Saint's Row 2...yet i would never touch GTAIV while i love Saint's Row 2.
[QUOTE="glez13"]So you actually played Skyward Sword? How was it?I remember the days when Zelda used to rule over all the Action Adventure games of any kind. Those days are long gone. Batman is better.
Shinobishyguy
Haven't finished it, but so far Batman AC is better, I'm getting annoyed with all this "side" nonsense that brings nothing to the game. This will probably beat Wind Waker for extending game time with annoying useless stuff. :x
[QUOTE="TH1Sx1SxSPARTA"]i was gonna get zelda today but decided to wait and get it later, i have to many other games to play, but batman ac is one of this gens best, skyward sword would have to kick some ass to be as goodTikeio
Question: If I didn't like Arkham Asylum, would I like Arkham City?
It wasn't the story or anything that I didn't like in AA, it was just the simplistic combat system.
you prob would not like arkham city then, since its combat is similar to AA, except even betterSo you actually played Skyward Sword? How was it?[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"][QUOTE="glez13"]
I remember the days when Zelda used to rule over all the Action Adventure games of any kind. Those days are long gone. Batman is better.
glez13
Haven't finished it, but so far Batman AC is better, I'm getting annoyed with all this "side" nonsense that brings nothing to the game. This will probably beat Wind Waker for extending game time with annoying useless stuff. :x
so how would you say this ranks amongst the other zeldas[QUOTE="glez13"]
[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"] So you actually played Skyward Sword? How was it?Shinobishyguy
Haven't finished it, but so far Batman AC is better, I'm getting annoyed with all this "side" nonsense that brings nothing to the game. This will probably beat Wind Waker for extending game time with annoying useless stuff. :x
so how would you say this ranks amongst the other zeldasMaybe like this, but hard to tell
ALTTP
OOT
TLOZ
MM
LA
OOS
OOA
WW
-Around here for now
TP
MC
TAOL
What? Seriously? Are you SERIOUSLY gonna compare those two and make ZELDA seem like the inferior game? Lol, either you're a fanboy, or you have a peanut sized brain.These 2 games are in different leagues, zelda is not Worthy to be compared to Batman AC
Advid-Gamer
So you actually played Skyward Sword? How was it?[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"][QUOTE="glez13"]
I remember the days when Zelda used to rule over all the Action Adventure games of any kind. Those days are long gone. Batman is better.
glez13
Haven't finished it, but so far Batman AC is better, I'm getting annoyed with all this "side" nonsense that brings nothing to the game. This will probably beat Wind Waker for extending game time with annoying useless stuff. :x
Right, because Batman is only storyline... oh wait, its 80% side missions too. Every riddler trophy, every challenge or catwoman mission... all side missions.[QUOTE="madsnakehhh"]
[QUOTE="Advid-Gamer"]
These 2 games are in different leagues, zelda is not Worthy to be compared to Batman AC
glez13
Did anyone even bothers by reading the OP...or people just jump after only reading the title :|
If the two are in different leagues why would he want Zelda when he is given the choice to choose between both.:|
I would choose skyward sword :|Arkham City features the goddamn Batman.
Skyward Sword features some autistic elf who's probably hiding in the closet, if you know what I mean.
Arkham City by far.
What? Seriously? Are you SERIOUSLY gonna compare those two and make ZELDA seem like the inferior game? Lol, either you're a fanboy, or you have a peanut sized brain. Seriously, yes I am, I have them both dumbass.[QUOTE="Advid-Gamer"]
These 2 games are in different leagues, zelda is not Worthy to be compared to Batman AC
khoofia_pika
[QUOTE="Advid-Gamer"]
These 2 games are in different leagues, zelda is not Worthy to be compared to Batman AC
madsnakehhh
Did anyone even bothers by reading the OP...or people just jump after only reading the title :|
I answered the way I wanted to, seeing how I already own them both, that ok with you dad?Having played both, i would say Batman Arkham City by a lonnnnnnnng shot. Zelda games are stuck in the past in terms of their design, and Nintendo definitely needs better HCI consultants, their user interfaces suck.
Let's see... depends on what you're looking for in a game:
For story, I'd say SS
For gameplay, I'd say AC.
Overall, I'd say AC but that's just me.
Arkham City is like, a thousand bajillion times better.
Better combat, better world, better graphics, better story, better everything really.
It was basically a 10 hour long super tribute to everything Batman.
SS is vastly superior, actually. I love Batman and the Arkham games, but SS is just completely amazing imo; can't put it down.
princemarth23
AA is better than SS, so I imagine AC will be better than it too (and probably AA).
You just killed your own arguement. SS has 30+ hours on the first run through and possibly 50+ on your second if you'd like to attempt 100% WTF? 10 hours? I haven't gotten AC yet, but AA was a 14 hours long game for me, WITHOUT getting 100%. I'll be doing that soon before I get AC.Arkham City is like, a thousand bajillion times better.
Better combat, better world, better graphics, better story, better everything really.
It was basically a 10 hour long super tribute to everything Batman.
-TheSecondSign-
[QUOTE="-TheSecondSign-"]You just killed your own arguement. SS has 30+ hours on the first run through and possibly 50+ on your second if you'd like to attempt 100% WTF? 10 hours? I haven't gotten AC yet, but AA was a 14 hours long game for me, WITHOUT getting 100%. I'll be doing that soon before I get AC.Arkham City is like, a thousand bajillion times better.
Better combat, better world, better graphics, better story, better everything really.
It was basically a 10 hour long super tribute to everything Batman.
YoshiYogurt
Playtime is not always the winning factor. The first 10 hours of SS are rather boring.
[QUOTE="-TheSecondSign-"]You just killed your own arguement. SS has 30+ hours on the first run through and possibly 50+ on your second if you'd like to attempt 100% WTF? 10 hours? I haven't gotten AC yet, but AA was a 14 hours long game for me, WITHOUT getting 100%. I'll be doing that soon before I get AC.So length determines the quality of a game? I guess FF13 is one of the best games I've ever played because it took me 45 hours to finish.Arkham City is like, a thousand bajillion times better.
Better combat, better world, better graphics, better story, better everything really.
It was basically a 10 hour long super tribute to everything Batman.
YoshiYogurt
[QUOTE="YoshiYogurt"][QUOTE="-TheSecondSign-"]You just killed your own arguement. SS has 30+ hours on the first run through and possibly 50+ on your second if you'd like to attempt 100% WTF? 10 hours? I haven't gotten AC yet, but AA was a 14 hours long game for me, WITHOUT getting 100%. I'll be doing that soon before I get AC.So length determines the quality of a game? I guess FF13 is one of the best games I've ever played because it took me 45 hours to finish. I'm sure most people would prefer a short amazing game rather than a long boring one.Arkham City is like, a thousand bajillion times better.
Better combat, better world, better graphics, better story, better everything really.
It was basically a 10 hour long super tribute to everything Batman.
Grawse
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment