This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="skanjos"]quick question.. do you own an xbox 360?i will point a house md reference for you ,"everybody lies" ,and its teh internet. everyone that has played uncharted 2 knows it is the best in the department.pff there are people that were saying that alan wake/rdr was console graphics king when geow3 and crysis 2 wasnt out.....some just need an excuse to have the better graphics game on their system thats all
sts106mat
yup offcourse i couldnt miss lost odyssey/tales of vesperia/alan wake and its cheap as hell. i own all 4 system thought i mostly play on the pc (consoles games drought this summer...)
[QUOTE="skanjos"][QUOTE="sts106mat"] quick question.. do you own an xbox 360?sts106mat
yup offcourse i couldnt miss lost odyssey/tales of vesperia/alan wake and its cheap as hell. i own all 4 system thought i mostly play on the pc (consoles games drought this summer...)
so you have played gears 3 then? can you give us your gamertag?dont have gamertags for either ps3 or 360, never got in this craze dont care for people to see what i have played or i am playing. i have finished geow3 and have participated in the multi beta thought. the last games i played on 360 are fifa12 demo/geow3 and fifa11 if my memory is right.soz for the offtopic.
its funny, the denial by some people who only have 360 to think that gears3 and crysis 2 are the top graphics games for consoles.
lads serius go rent a ps3 and play uncharted 2 (not killzone2/3 god of war 3 etc just uncharted 2),"buuut i have played it and it doesnt have better graphics" noone will believe you, everyone that has played uncharted 2 (not just watched videos on youtube) will say that it has the best graphics on consoles. not just on a technical standpoint but overall graphics nothing beats uncharted 2 on consoles and its a game from 2009... give it a rest plz. waiting for uncharted 3 to put a tombstone to all the crybabies out there.....
skanjos
Wrong. Graphics are subjective. I still think Crysis 2 looks better than Uncharted 2.
in my opinion ps3 owners get confused. god of war 3 has amazing graphics (similar to uncharted2) but not throughtout the whole game,it has good points where you go whoaa and some areas are meh.. killzone2/3 on the other hand have amazing textures/lightning etc but is too dark and grey but thats not the point it still is behind uncharted 2 because it has more open areas than u2. uncharted 2 does everything right in the graphics department ,i really cant see much of a difference in u3 than in u2 and that means alot. on the other side you can see a great difference in gears 2 and 3(and people were calling gears 2 console graphics king for a while too...)
i answered your question "everybody lies",you expect truth from the media? from the reviewers? its the industry m8. check everything with your own eyes.
its funny, the denial by some people who only have 360 to think that gears3 and crysis 2 are the top graphics games for consoles.
lads serius go rent a ps3 and play uncharted 2 (not killzone2/3 god of war 3 etc just uncharted 2),"buuut i have played it and it doesnt have better graphics" noone will believe you, everyone that has played uncharted 2 (not just watched videos on youtube) will say that it has the best graphics on consoles. not just on a technical standpoint but overall graphics nothing beats uncharted 2 on consoles and its a game from 2009... give it a rest plz. waiting for uncharted 3 to put a tombstone to all the crybabies out there.....
skanjos
Stop being arrogant man :?
I played Uncharted 2 and agree that it looks fantastic, however, a few games on both hd consoles reached at least the same visual quality too.
After beating Gears 3 campaign, i can easly tell that it´s the best looking console game on the market. Go play Act 5 (azura) and tell me with a straight face that not incredible.
I don't know that much about technical mumbo jumbo. Almost every graphics thread there's people saying "well this game has this kind of AA", or "this game uses this knd of lighting", "or this game uses tessellation", etc... There's also the argument that a game has better graphics because the environments are bigger. I don't know or care about any of this stuff. I judge a game's visuals by what I see with my eyes. And I don't mean art direction, I mean the textures, lighting, animations, etc... And when it comes to what most visually wows me, I still haven't been more impressed than with U2 and GOW3. I will say that Gears 3 looks amazing and is definitely an improvement over Gears 1&2, not to mention that it's an awesome game, but it didn't gve me the same wow factor as the affore mentioned games.incuensuocha
Lambent berserker at anvil gate didn't just wow me, it blew my socks off.
[QUOTE="incuensuocha"]I don't know that much about technical mumbo jumbo. Almost every graphics thread there's people saying "well this game has this kind of AA", or "this game uses this knd of lighting", "or this game uses tessellation", etc... There's also the argument that a game has better graphics because the environments are bigger. I don't know or care about any of this stuff. I judge a game's visuals by what I see with my eyes. And I don't mean art direction, I mean the textures, lighting, animations, etc... And when it comes to what most visually wows me, I still haven't been more impressed than with U2 and GOW3. I will say that Gears 3 looks amazing and is definitely an improvement over Gears 1&2, not to mention that it's an awesome game, but it didn't gve me the same wow factor as the affore mentioned games.Bretter2200
Lambent berserker at anvil gate didn't just wow me, it blew my socks off.
Haven't gotten there yet, just into Act II, but trust me, I've been plenty impressed by Gears 3, but not quite to the same level.[QUOTE="Bretter2200"][QUOTE="incuensuocha"]I don't know that much about technical mumbo jumbo. Almost every graphics thread there's people saying "well this game has this kind of AA", or "this game uses this knd of lighting", "or this game uses tessellation", etc... There's also the argument that a game has better graphics because the environments are bigger. I don't know or care about any of this stuff. I judge a game's visuals by what I see with my eyes. And I don't mean art direction, I mean the textures, lighting, animations, etc... And when it comes to what most visually wows me, I still haven't been more impressed than with U2 and GOW3. I will say that Gears 3 looks amazing and is definitely an improvement over Gears 1&2, not to mention that it's an awesome game, but it didn't gve me the same wow factor as the affore mentioned games.incuensuocha
Lambent berserker at anvil gate didn't just wow me, it blew my socks off.
Haven't gotten there yet, just into Act II, but trust me, I've been plenty impressed by Gears 3, but not quite to the same level.I was impressed by Act 1, more impressed by act 2 and then blown away at act 3 - 5.
well reading from the tech analysis, seems to me that uncharted 2 is still more consistent than geow3.
supdotcom
No, Uncharted 2 fails to hold its single player graphics in multi-player. Quite literally. Gears of war 3 is actually quite consistant over all, never modifying its actual graphicacal capabilites. Though that doesn't make Uncharted 2 a bad game what so ever, as I don't even play the MP.
[QUOTE="incuensuocha"]I don't know that much about technical mumbo jumbo. Almost every graphics thread there's people saying "well this game has this kind of AA", or "this game uses this knd of lighting", "or this game uses tessellation", etc... There's also the argument that a game has better graphics because the environments are bigger. I don't know or care about any of this stuff. I judge a game's visuals by what I see with my eyes. And I don't mean art direction, I mean the textures, lighting, animations, etc... And when it comes to what most visually wows me, I still haven't been more impressed than with U2 and GOW3. I will say that Gears 3 looks amazing and is definitely an improvement over Gears 1&2, not to mention that it's an awesome game, but it didn't gve me the same wow factor as the affore mentioned games.Bretter2200
Lambent berserker at anvil gate didn't just wow me, it blew my socks off.
Act 5 in general. Best looking level i have ever seen in a game :P
How can Gears 3 dethrone Crysis 2 as graphics king when A) Gears 3 isn't the graphics king B) Crysis 2 has never been the graphics king.gears 3 just dethroned crysis 2 as the new console grahics king, but of course, it's no surprise that cows don't want to admit it.
MozartXVI
crysis 2 was never console graphic king[QUOTE="Diviniuz"][QUOTE="MozartXVI"]
gears 3 just dethroned crysis 2 as the new console grahics king, but of course, it's no surprise that cows don't want to admit it.
NeonNinja
Yes it was.
Not it wasn't. There are plenty of PS3 exclusives that look better than Crysis 2.Did anyone seriously think that a game with no AA, framerate drops and screen tearing could dethrone UC2 graphically? If you want to compete with PS3 exclusives in terms of visuals, your first step should be not to use Unreal Engine.
You could say that. But God of War 3 and Gears 3 are just as impressive,
In the case of Gears of war 3 it has more advanced effects and lighting than UC2, but at the cost of AA and some performance issues. Gears tears frames like Drakes fortune did, almost.
I suspect Battlefield 3 to be just as impressive as well, and RAGE will be the most impressive console game, period.
Did anyone seriously think that a game with no AA, framerate drops and screen tearing could dethrone UC2 graphically? If you want to compete with PS3 exclusives in terms of visuals, your first step should be not to use Unreal Engine.
BlbecekBobecek
Well, it´s safe to say that Perfect Dark Xbla is the current graphics king then! It runs at 60fps and is 1080p :P
On a serious note, Gears 3 and it´s Unreal Engine 3 dot something, does indeed look better than anything currently on PS3 in my opinion.
Did anyone seriously think that a game with no AA, framerate drops and screen tearing could dethrone UC2 graphically? If you want to compete with PS3 exclusives in terms of visuals, your first step should be not to use Unreal Engine.
BlbecekBobecek
Yeah right, explain to me why infamous 2 has all of those problems? Or why a crack in time is half HD? Or why God of war 3 has restricted movement walls? Or why the killzone series from 2 has turned into a corridor shooter? Or why GT5 has 20% of frames torn + regularly dips into 40 fps and TERRIBLE shadows when forza 3 never had any of these problems?
lol crysis 2 graphics king. Crysis 1 looked better :lol:gears 3 just dethroned crysis 2 as the new console grahics king, but of course, it's no surprise that cows don't want to admit it.
MozartXVI
Did anyone seriously think that a game with no AA, framerate drops and screen tearing could dethrone UC2 graphically? If you want to compete with PS3 exclusives in terms of visuals, your first step should be not to use Unreal Engine.
BlbecekBobecek
And yet, it does have A.A. There's obvious FXAA implamentation since the beta; and jags don't just magically go away. Especially when Epic updated Unreal specificallty for FXAA right after it.
The game drops in frame rate to about 28 if you get a large amount of enemies on the screen and or particle affect directly infront of your camera. It's not even noticeable.
And tearing is cured by triple buffering, Uncharted 2 uses this. But unfortently is causes input lag.
Nope, that award belongs to Uncharted 3 and the Unhcarted 3 beta proved it. There is no other console game that can compete with Uncharted 3 IMO.
And yet, it does have A.A. There's obvious FXAA implamentation since the beta; and jags don't just magically go away. Especially when Epic updated Unreal specificallty for FXAA right after it.
Bretter2200
According to DF, there is no FXAA. It seems to have been cut. Just because Epic implemented it into UDK, doesn't mean Gears is also using it.
[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]
And yet, it does have A.A. There's obvious FXAA implamentation since the beta; and jags don't just magically go away. Especially when Epic updated Unreal specificallty for FXAA right after it.
ChubbyGuy40
According to DF, there is no FXAA. It seems to have been cut. Just because Epic implemented it into UDK, doesn't mean Gears is also using it.
Cut? It wasn't implamented into the beta generally. And it's easy to see. Jags don't magically go away, for instance... Look at the beta/retail comp.
Nope, that award belongs to Uncharted 3 and the Unhcarted 3 beta proved it. There is no other console game that can compete with Uncharted 3 IMO.
ShadowMoses900
Uncharted 3 hasn't come out yet.
[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]
[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]
And yet, it does have A.A. There's obvious FXAA implamentation since the beta; and jags don't just magically go away. Especially when Epic updated Unreal specificallty for FXAA right after it.
Bretter2200
According to DF, there is no FXAA. It seems to have been cut. Just because Epic implemented it into UDK, doesn't mean Gears is also using it.
Cut? It wasn't implamented into the beta generally. And it's easy to see. Jags don't magically go away, for instance... Look at the beta/retail comp.
You keep posting that small picture yet in his link they did a deep analysis.... Nothing wrong if it doesn't have AA, it still looks fantastic.on consoles: Uc2 < Crysis 2 x360 < Gears 3 (and soon: < Uc3)
... also I thought it isn't allowed to use "graphics king" while excluding one specific system, the Pc? Because the differences on console games become irrelevant if we comprare them to several years old PC games :/
It's "allowed," it just means nothing and counts for nothing.on consoles: Uc2 < Crysis 2 x360 < Gears 3 (and soon: < Uc3)
... also I thought it isn't allowed to use "graphics king" while excluding one specific system, the Pc? Because the differences on console games become irrelevant if we comprare them to several years old PC games :/
ArchoNils2
[QUOTE="MozartXVI"]okay coming from me(who has beat uc2, rented crysis 2, borrowed KZ3, beat KZ2, and am currently playing geow3 at my cousins house via co-op ;), i can say UC2 surely is more impressive than all of these (overall). most of these game look better in different departments, but UC2 is all around best looking and performance wise as well. KZ2 and GOW3 also look very good LOL!! No. Animation wise, UC2 probably has some of the best, but overall in terms of action, environment and interaction with environment it's easily beat by Gears 3 & KZ3.gears 3 just dethroned crysis 2 as the new console grahics king, but of course, it's no surprise that cows don't want to admit it.
SpeedsterCards
[QUOTE="SpeedsterCards"][QUOTE="MozartXVI"]okay coming from me(who has beat uc2, rented crysis 2, borrowed KZ3, beat KZ2, and am currently playing geow3 at my cousins house via co-op ;), i can say UC2 surely is more impressive than all of these (overall). most of these game look better in different departments, but UC2 is all around best looking and performance wise as well. KZ2 and GOW3 also look very good LOL!! No. Animation wise, UC2 probably has some of the best, but overall in terms of action, environment and interaction with environment it's easily beat by Gears 3 & KZ3.gears 3 just dethroned crysis 2 as the new console grahics king, but of course, it's no surprise that cows don't want to admit it.
blackace
UC2 does a great job on interaction with enviorment.
[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]
[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]
According to DF, there is no FXAA. It seems to have been cut. Just because Epic implemented it into UDK, doesn't mean Gears is also using it.
Chutebox
Cut? It wasn't implamented into the beta generally. And it's easy to see. Jags don't magically go away, for instance... Look at the beta/retail comp.
You keep posting that small picture yet in his link they did a deep analysis.... Nothing wrong if it doesn't have AA, it still looks fantastic.I didn't see the deep analysis, in fact I provided a more elaborate one then them. There human, as am I. And it's not hard to tell there's a large amount of jags in the beta compared to retail. So Epic obviously did some thing with the extra time to develop.
I always thought God of War 3 was the graphics king.
chocolate1325
No. That game granted is fun, it's not graphics king though. It's basically Uncharted in a constant scripted sequence, and those are the only areas that look generally above average.
[QUOTE="chocolate1325"]
I always thought God of War 3 was the graphics king.
Bretter2200
No. That game granted is fun, it's not graphics king though. It's basically Uncharted in a constant scripted sequence, and those are the only areas that look generally above average.
That game looked CLEAN though. Barely noticed any jaggies at all. For a console game, that was impressive.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment