So does this mean Uncharted 2 is still graphics queen?

I always thought God of War 3 was the graphics king.

chocolate1325

over crysis?

From what I've seen Gears 3 looks amazing BUT still suffers from technical hiccups like texture pop-ins and it takes a while for the textures to load even during cutscenes. Its an impressive looking game but it cant be king

From what I've seen Gears 3 looks amazing BUT still suffers from technical hiccups like texture pop-ins and it takes a while for the textures to load even during cutscenes. Its an impressive looking game but it cant be king

Zaibach

Install to the HDD...

[QUOTE="Zaibach"]

From what I've seen Gears 3 looks amazing BUT still suffers from technical hiccups like texture pop-ins and it takes a while for the textures to load even during cutscenes. Its an impressive looking game but it cant be king

CorbraMax

Install to the HDD...

the so called graphics king should'nt need anything to excuse it and shouldnt be conditional on circumstances either

especially since MS has been selling those gimped xbox consoles with a measley 4gig hard-drive

If Uncharted 2 is console graphics king... Why is this graphical effect missing in Uncharted 2?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtn3xUFP190

Also notice the transparency resolution for the fire effects are high res compared to what was seen in Uncharted 3...

CorbraMax

:o mind = blown.

that looks miles ahead of any other console game.

[QUOTE="CorbraMax"]

[QUOTE="Zaibach"]

From what I've seen Gears 3 looks amazing BUT still suffers from technical hiccups like texture pop-ins and it takes a while for the textures to load even during cutscenes. Its an impressive looking game but it cant be king

Zaibach

Install to the HDD...

the so called graphics king should'nt need anything to excuse it and shouldnt be conditional on circumstances either

especially since MS has been selling those gimped xbox consoles with a measley 4gig hard-drive

LMAO

[QUOTE="CorbraMax"]

[QUOTE="Zaibach"]

From what I've seen Gears 3 looks amazing BUT still suffers from technical hiccups like texture pop-ins and it takes a while for the textures to load even during cutscenes. Its an impressive looking game but it cant be king

Zaibach

Install to the HDD...

the so called graphics king should'nt need anything to excuse it and shouldnt be conditional on circumstances either

especially since MS has been selling those gimped xbox consoles with a measley 4gig hard-drive

For streaming high quality textures... It's a must. Gameplay wise, I've not seen any texture pop ins at all...

No such thing and next time say console in your titel.

crysis 2 was never console graphic kingDiviniuz

Yes it was.

Crysis 2 is console graphics king on Xbox 360, Gears of War 3 a close second.

Crysis 2 is console graphics king on Xbox 360, Gears of War 3 a close second.

brennanhuff

Crysis 2 is a mess.

So it seems like Uncharted 2 still hold up to the best looking console game. KZ3 had a shot but just missed, then came Crysis 2, but it had a lot of performance issues and didn't hold up. And lastly...yikes this is awkward for 360 owners who have been hyping this games graphics to be the next king! Another reason why we should wait for games to be released before saying they are console graphics king... http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-gears-of-war-3

SpeedsterCards

[QUOTE="SpeedsterCards"]

So it seems like Uncharted 2 still hold up to the best looking console game. KZ3 had a shot but just missed, then came Crysis 2, but it had a lot of performance issues and didn't hold up. And lastly...yikes this is awkward for 360 owners who have been hyping this games graphics to be the next king! Another reason why we should wait for games to be released before saying they are console graphics king... http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-gears-of-war-3

monkeysmoke

Where's evidence Gears isn't using FXAA? I see a definite upgrade and lesser amount of jags since the beta.

The framerate falls max 26-28. And that's when a large amount of enemies and or particle effect directly hits your screen.

And tearing in Uncharted is masked by buffering which causes input lag.

I've yet to experience one of these issues, except texture pop. Which happend once during a cutscene and lasted two seconds.

[QUOTE="Zaibach"]

[QUOTE="CorbraMax"]

Install to the HDD...

CorbraMax

the so called graphics king should'nt need anything to excuse it and shouldnt be conditional on circumstances either

especially since MS has been selling those gimped xbox consoles with a measley 4gig hard-drive

For streaming high quality textures... It's a must. Gameplay wise, I've not seen any texture pop ins at all...

[QUOTE="SpeedsterCards"]

So it seems like Uncharted 2 still hold up to the best looking console game. KZ3 had a shot but just missed, then came Crysis 2, but it had a lot of performance issues and didn't hold up. And lastly...yikes this is awkward for 360 owners who have been hyping this games graphics to be the next king! Another reason why we should wait for games to be released before saying they are console graphics king... http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-gears-of-war-3

monkeysmoke

1.) Crysis 1 Max with no AA looks leaps and bounds better than every console game released yet.

2.) Gears 3 with no AA still looks better than Uncharted 2.

3.) Uncharted 1 had framerate drops and screen tearing... And it still looked better than Gears 1. Same rule applies here. But if you judge graphics on performance than you would also blindly say that Forza 3 looks better than GT5. Since that gamehadcrazy framerate drops and copious amounts of tearing.

4.) MLAA is not a cheap solution. Uncharted 3 is actually using a crappy version of it compared to God of War 3 and Killzone 3.

5.) Textures in UC2 load just as slow as Gears 3. Try playing a MP game. Uncharted 2 uses recorded cutscenes to mask texture loading.

6.) If Uncharted2 and Killzone 3 lighting, shadows, and motion blur are not as good Gears 3... How is it supposed to look better? Nevermind the increased texture resolution quality and filtering in Gears 3. Also the heavy amounts of high res alphas on display without going sub HD like Resistance 3 to pull it off.

[QUOTE="monkeysmoke"][QUOTE="SpeedsterCards"]

So it seems like Uncharted 2 still hold up to the best looking console game. KZ3 had a shot but just missed, then came Crysis 2, but it had a lot of performance issues and didn't hold up. And lastly...yikes this is awkward for 360 owners who have been hyping this games graphics to be the next king! Another reason why we should wait for games to be released before saying they are console graphics king... http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-gears-of-war-3

CorbraMax

1.) Crysis 1 Max with no AA looks leaps and bounds better than every console game released yet.

2.) Gears 3 with no AA still looks better than Uncharted 2.

3.) Uncharted 1 had framerate drops and screen tearing... And it still looked better than Gears 1. Same rule applies here. But if you judge graphics on performance than you would also blindly say that Forza 3 looks better than GT5. Since that gamehadcrazy framerate drops and copious amounts of tearing.

3.) MLAA is not a cheap solution. Uncharted 3 is actually using a crappy version of it compared to God of War 3 and Killzone 3.

4.) Textures in UC2 load just as slow as Gears 3. Try playing a MP game. Uncharted 2 uses recorded cutscenes to mask texture loading.

5.) If Uncharted2 and Killzone 3 lighting, shadows, and motion blur are not as good Gears 3... How is it supposed to look better? Nevermind the increased texture resolution quality and filtering in Gears 3. Also the heavy amounts of high res alphas on display without going sub HD like Resistance 3 to pull it off.

And Gears of war 3 is using A.A. It's obvious, as the beta contained no FXAA. Now there's far less jags in comparision.

[QUOTE="monkeysmoke"][QUOTE="SpeedsterCards"]

So it seems like Uncharted 2 still hold up to the best looking console game. KZ3 had a shot but just missed, then came Crysis 2, but it had a lot of performance issues and didn't hold up. And lastly...yikes this is awkward for 360 owners who have been hyping this games graphics to be the next king! Another reason why we should wait for games to be released before saying they are console graphics king... http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-gears-of-war-3

Bretter2200

Where's evidence Gears isn't using FXAA? I see a definite upgrade and lesser amount of jags since the beta.

The framerate falls max 26-28. And that's when a large amount of enemies and or particle effect directly hits your screen.

And tearing in Uncharted is masked by buffering which causes input lag.

I've yet to experience one of these issues, except texture pop. Which happend once during a cutscene and lasted two seconds.

[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]

[QUOTE="chocolate1325"]

I always thought God of War 3 was the graphics king.

Elann2008

No. That game granted is fun, it's not graphics king though. It's basically Uncharted in a constant scripted sequence, and those are the only areas that look generally above average.

Infamous 2 also has no AA... And a unstable framerate...

Killzone 2and 3 have unstable framerates.

Uncharted 1 has screen tearing

GT5. The biggest and highest selling exclusive on the PS3 has framerate drops, pop in, and crazy screen tearing.

I can do this all day.

gears 3 just dethroned crysis 2 as the new console grahics king, but of course, it's no surprise that cows don't want to admit it.

MozartXVI

Uhhhhh. Reading threads like this make me cringe..

Infamous 2 also has no AA... And a unstable framerate...

Killzone 2and 3 have unstable framerates.

Uncharted 1 has screen tearing

GT5. The biggest and highest selling exclusive on the PS3 has framerate drops, pop in, and crazy screen tearing.

I can do this all day.

CorbraMax

Crysis 2 was never graphics king of consoles or PC.... Well maybe for the PC with DX11 at stock it looks better than Crysis 1. For me its Gears 3, 2nd GOW3, and 3rd UC2.

[QUOTE="monkeysmoke"][QUOTE="SpeedsterCards"]

So it seems like Uncharted 2 still hold up to the best looking console game. KZ3 had a shot but just missed, then came Crysis 2, but it had a lot of performance issues and didn't hold up. And lastly...yikes this is awkward for 360 owners who have been hyping this games graphics to be the next king! Another reason why we should wait for games to be released before saying they are console graphics king... http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-gears-of-war-3

CorbraMax

1.) Crysis 1 Max with no AA looks leaps and bounds better than every console game released yet.

2.) Gears 3 with no AA still looks better than Uncharted 2.

3.) Uncharted 1 had framerate drops and screen tearing... And it still looked better than Gears 1. Same rule applies here. But if you judge graphics on performance than you would also blindly say that Forza 3 looks better than GT5. Since that gamehadcrazy framerate drops and copious amounts of tearing.

4.) MLAA is not a cheap solution. Uncharted 3 is actually using a crappy version of it compared to God of War 3 and Killzone 3.

5.) Textures in UC2 load just as slow as Gears 3. Try playing a MP game. Uncharted 2 uses recorded cutscenes to mask texture loading.

6.) If Uncharted2 and Killzone 3 lighting, shadows, and motion blur are not as good Gears 3... How is it supposed to look better? Nevermind the increased texture resolution quality and filtering in Gears 3. Also the heavy amounts of high res alphas on display without going sub HD like Resistance 3 to pull it off.

[QUOTE="CorbraMax"]

[QUOTE="monkeysmoke"] Well what i can realy tell from your link is that Gears of War 3 suffers : 1. No AA = Jaggy look 2. Ustable Framerat drops to 25fps sometimes 3. Screen Tearing. For me it a shame for a 2011 high rated exclusive to launch without a single AA when there are many cheap AA solutions out there (FXAA & MLAA) :( . Oh i forgot to mention that textures still loads slower in Gears 3.....ofcause it an unreal engine game. Uncharted 2 & killzone 3 still looks and perform far beter.monkeysmoke

1.) Crysis 1 Max with no AA looks leaps and bounds better than every console game released yet.

2.) Gears 3 with no AA still looks better than Uncharted 2.

3.) Uncharted 1 had framerate drops and screen tearing... And it still looked better than Gears 1. Same rule applies here. But if you judge graphics on performance than you would also blindly say that Forza 3 looks better than GT5. Since that gamehadcrazy framerate drops and copious amounts of tearing.

4.) MLAA is not a cheap solution. Uncharted 3 is actually using a crappy version of it compared to God of War 3 and Killzone 3.

5.) Textures in UC2 load just as slow as Gears 3. Try playing a MP game. Uncharted 2 uses recorded cutscenes to mask texture loading.

6.) If Uncharted2 and Killzone 3 lighting, shadows, and motion blur are not as good Gears 3... How is it supposed to look better? Nevermind the increased texture resolution quality and filtering in Gears 3. Also the heavy amounts of high res alphas on display without going sub HD like Resistance 3 to pull it off.

[QUOTE="CorbraMax"]

Infamous 2 also has no AA... And a unstable framerate...

Killzone 2and 3 have unstable framerates.

Uncharted 1 has screen tearing

GT5. The biggest and highest selling exclusive on the PS3 has framerate drops, pop in, and crazy screen tearing.

I can do this all day.

Cow4ever

Gears 3 is a very smooth game. So Killzone 3 & 2are just as "unstable" as Gears 3. Why don't you see the framerate analysis for those games from digital foundry.

And lies about Infamous 2 and GT5 not being hyped as graphics kings.

[QUOTE="CorbraMax"]

[QUOTE="monkeysmoke"] Well what i can realy tell from your link is that Gears of War 3 suffers : 1. No AA = Jaggy look 2. Ustable Framerat drops to 25fps sometimes 3. Screen Tearing. For me it a shame for a 2011 high rated exclusive to launch without a single AA when there are many cheap AA solutions out there (FXAA & MLAA) :( . Oh i forgot to mention that textures still loads slower in Gears 3.....ofcause it an unreal engine game. Uncharted 2 & killzone 3 still looks and perform far beter.monkeysmoke

1.) Crysis 1 Max with no AA looks leaps and bounds better than every console game released yet.

2.) Gears 3 with no AA still looks better than Uncharted 2.

3.) Uncharted 1 had framerate drops and screen tearing... And it still looked better than Gears 1. Same rule applies here. But if you judge graphics on performance than you would also blindly say that Forza 3 looks better than GT5. Since that gamehadcrazy framerate drops and copious amounts of tearing.

4.) MLAA is not a cheap solution. Uncharted 3 is actually using a crappy version of it compared to God of War 3 and Killzone 3.

5.) Textures in UC2 load just as slow as Gears 3. Try playing a MP game. Uncharted 2 uses recorded cutscenes to mask texture loading.

6.) If Uncharted2 and Killzone 3 lighting, shadows, and motion blur are not as good Gears 3... How is it supposed to look better? Nevermind the increased texture resolution quality and filtering in Gears 3. Also the heavy amounts of high res alphas on display without going sub HD like Resistance 3 to pull it off.

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"][QUOTE="CorbraMax"]

Infamous 2 also has no AA... And a unstable framerate...

Killzone 2and 3 have unstable framerates.

Uncharted 1 has screen tearing

GT5. The biggest and highest selling exclusive on the PS3 has framerate drops, pop in, and crazy screen tearing.

I can do this all day.

CorbraMax

Gears 3 is a very smooth game. So Killzone 3 & 2are just as "unstable" as Gears 3. Why don't you see the framerate analysis for those games from digital foundry.

And lies about Infamous 2 and GT5 not being hyped as graphics kings.

[QUOTE="CorbraMax"]

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"] Killzone 3 & 2 doesn't have unstable framerate, Infamous 2 is open world and I don't think anyone claims it's graphics king, same for UDF and GT5. Cow4ever

Gears 3 is a very smooth game. So Killzone 3 & 2are just as "unstable" as Gears 3. Why don't you see the framerate analysis for those games from digital foundry.

And lies about Infamous 2 and GT5 not being hyped as graphics kings.

[QUOTE="monkeysmoke"][QUOTE="CorbraMax"]

1.) Crysis 1 Max with no AA looks leaps and bounds better than every console game released yet.

2.) Gears 3 with no AA still looks better than Uncharted 2.

3.) Uncharted 1 had framerate drops and screen tearing... And it still looked better than Gears 1. Same rule applies here. But if you judge graphics on performance than you would also blindly say that Forza 3 looks better than GT5. Since that gamehadcrazy framerate drops and copious amounts of tearing.

4.) MLAA is not a cheap solution. Uncharted 3 is actually using a crappy version of it compared to God of War 3 and Killzone 3.

5.) Textures in UC2 load just as slow as Gears 3. Try playing a MP game. Uncharted 2 uses recorded cutscenes to mask texture loading.

6.) If Uncharted2 and Killzone 3 lighting, shadows, and motion blur are not as good Gears 3... How is it supposed to look better? Nevermind the increased texture resolution quality and filtering in Gears 3. Also the heavy amounts of high res alphas on display without going sub HD like Resistance 3 to pull it off.

Cow4ever

Killzone 3 has low resolution particle effects. The performance shouldn't be bad at all. lolNeither Uncharted 2 or Gears 3 have dynamic texturing. Only one game this gen does that. It's called RAGE.

It's not like Xbox 360 can't do MLAA. It's inCostume Quest on XBLA. They just can't afford it. The AA used in Uncharted 3 is not good either. It's actually worse than 2XMSAA.

Infamous 2 also has no AA... And a unstable framerate...

Killzone 2and 3 have unstable framerates.

Uncharted 1 has screen tearing

GT5. The biggest and highest selling exclusive on the PS3 has framerate drops, pop in, and crazy screen tearing.

I can do this all day.

CorbraMax

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"][QUOTE="CorbraMax"]

Gears 3 is a very smooth game. So Killzone 3 & 2are just as "unstable" as Gears 3. Why don't you see the framerate analysis for those games from digital foundry.

And lies about Infamous 2 and GT5 not being hyped as graphics kings.

Innovazero2000

[QUOTE="CorbraMax"]

Infamous 2 also has no AA... And a unstable framerate...

Killzone 2and 3 have unstable framerates.

Uncharted 1 has screen tearing

GT5. The biggest and highest selling exclusive on the PS3 has framerate drops, pop in, and crazy screen tearing.

I can do this all day.

Diviniuz

The point is that every one of these high end exclusives have graphical shortcomings. May it be tearing, framerate drops, jaggies, or texture pop ins. Both of these systems only have 512MB of RAM. But there are some cows on here that truly believe that the PS3 is a supercomputer with no ceiling.

[QUOTE="Innovazero2000"][QUOTE="Cow4ever"] Killzone 3 doesn't drop to 26 despite having alot of action on screen and great particle effects. And it also doesn't have to cut AA and texture quality.Cow4ever

You're gonna honestly tell yourself that the texture work in Acts 3 and 5 are one big pixel? Or are you in serious denial?

You really need to play Gears of War 1 to understand the concept of framerate drops. Gears 3 is smooth as butter.

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"][QUOTE="monkeysmoke"] AA realy matters,Put Gears of War 3 side by side with Killzone 3 and you'll notice how rough and jaggy the edges looks in Gears of War 3. For texture Killzone 3 uses higher resolution texture compared to Gears 3. One problem with Gears of War 3 is that it repeats texture compared to Uncharted 2's dynamic texturing. If you've played unchated 2 you'll notice that every enviroment has attention to ditails to its texture. For lighting i'll say gears beats uncharted 2 but i'll still give the best lighting on console to killzone 2 for the fact it handles the highest amount of dynamic light source i've seen in a game. The only thing that impressed me in Gears of War 3 is the way it handles it smoke particle effects. Though Killzone 3 has great particle effects too.CorbraMax

Killzone 3 has low resolution particle effects. The performance shouldn't be bad at all. lolNeither Uncharted 2 or Gears 3 have dynamic texturing. Only one game this gen does that. It's called RAGE.

It's not like Xbox 360 can't do MLAA. It's inCostume Quest on XBLA. They just can't afford it. The AA used in Uncharted 3 is not good either. It's actually worse than 2XMSAA.

Infamous 2 also has no AA... And a unstable framerate...

Killzone 2and 3 have unstable framerates.

Uncharted 1 has screen tearing

GT5. The biggest and highest selling exclusive on the PS3 has framerate drops, pop in, and crazy screen tearing.

I can do this all day.

CorbraMax

[QUOTE="Diviniuz"][QUOTE="CorbraMax"]

Infamous 2 also has no AA... And a unstable framerate...

Killzone 2and 3 have unstable framerates.

Uncharted 1 has screen tearing

GT5. The biggest and highest selling exclusive on the PS3 has framerate drops, pop in, and crazy screen tearing.

I can do this all day.

CorbraMax

The point is that every one of these high end exclusives have graphical shortcomings. May it be tearing, framerate drops, jaggies, or texture pop ins. Both of these systems only have 512MB of RAM. But there are some cows on here that truly believe that the PS3 is a supercomputer with no ceiling.

[QUOTE="CorbraMax"]

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"] Well this. Killzone 3 has great particle effects but it doesn't take it out on the performance, texture detail and AA like Gears 3. And the lightning is pretty decent also. Cow4ever

Killzone 3 has low resolution particle effects. The performance shouldn't be bad at all. lolNeither Uncharted 2 or Gears 3 have dynamic texturing. Only one game this gen does that. It's called RAGE.

It's not like Xbox 360 can't do MLAA. It's inCostume Quest on XBLA. They just can't afford it. The AA used in Uncharted 3 is not good either. It's actually worse than 2XMSAA.

Actually I'm pretty sure Gears 3 could afford FXAA. It is only 0.9ms of rendering time. It just blurs the image too much in it's current state. See Dues Ex 3.And then we will have people on here complaining that it's too blurry. So if the game is native HD and not sub HDpeople will always pick at something.

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"]

[QUOTE="Innovazero2000"] Where does Gears 3 give up texture quality, because it dumps all over the first 2 and increase it's quality of filtering quite a bit. On top of that KZ3 does drop frames, although not very often like Gears 3. You make Gears out to be Crysis 2 in it's dropped frames and that is simply not even the case.CorbraMax

You're gonna honestly tell yourself that the texture work in Acts 3 and 5 are one big pixel? Or are you in serious denial?

You really need to play Gears of War 1 to understand the concept of framerate drops. Gears 3 is smooth as butter.

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"][QUOTE="CorbraMax"]

Killzone 3 has low resolution particle effects. The performance shouldn't be bad at all. lolNeither Uncharted 2 or Gears 3 have dynamic texturing. Only one game this gen does that. It's called RAGE.

It's not like Xbox 360 can't do MLAA. It's inCostume Quest on XBLA. They just can't afford it. The AA used in Uncharted 3 is not good either. It's actually worse than 2XMSAA.

CorbraMax

Actually I'm pretty sure Gears 3 could afford FXAA. It is only 0.9ms of rendering time. It just blurs the image too much in it's current state. See Dues Ex 3.And then we will have people on here complaining that it's too blurry. So if the game is native HD and not sub HDpeople will always pick at something.

[QUOTE="CorbraMax"]

[QUOTE="Diviniuz"] killzone 3 does not have unstable frame rates and killzone 2 only really had it during the bridge section, the rest of the game was extremely stable. and I have no idea why you brought up UC1 Anyways, I am pretty sure Gears 3>Uc2 in graphics but I have yet to play itCow4ever

The point is that every one of these high end exclusives have graphical shortcomings. May it be tearing, framerate drops, jaggies, or texture pop ins. Both of these systems only have 512MB of RAM. But there are some cows on here that truly believe that the PS3 is a supercomputer with no ceiling.

You lie way too much on here.

Uncharted 2 does have jaggies. And it doesdrop frames. And there are texture pop ins. The only thing it doesn't do is tear.

[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]

[QUOTE="monkeysmoke"] Well what i can realy tell from your link is that Gears of War 3 suffers : 1. No AA = Jaggy look 2. Ustable Framerat drops to 25fps sometimes 3. Screen Tearing. For me it a shame for a 2011 high rated exclusive to launch without a single AA when there are many cheap AA solutions out there (FXAA & MLAA) :( . Oh i forgot to mention that textures still loads slower in Gears 3.....ofcause it an unreal engine game. Uncharted 2 & killzone 3 still looks and perform far beter.monkeysmoke

Where's evidence Gears isn't using FXAA? I see a definite upgrade and lesser amount of jags since the beta.

The framerate falls max 26-28. And that's when a large amount of enemies and or particle effect directly hits your screen.

And tearing in Uncharted is masked by buffering which causes input lag.

I've yet to experience one of these issues, except texture pop. Which happend once during a cutscene and lasted two seconds.

I know its DF with their analyse, but seriously when it drops to 26-29 fps its only for like under a second , u wont even notice .. jaggies its there yes, but really not something you will notice that much - screen tearing is second to none, atleast u cant see it(top of the screen maybe) dunno - panyway gears 3 is seriously fantastic so far and surely does a better job than uc2 .. both great games none the less.

Anyway gotta love people that dont play the games, and only come to nitpick if some site says something bad , which isnt bad at all in matter fact .. please serious play the games before making opinions..

[QUOTE="CorbraMax"]

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"] Like when there textures are pretty much just a big pixel. I know KZ3 dropps frames I noticed it myself but it's really really rare and tiny drops. Gears 3 does it more. Nah nothing is as bad as Crysis 2

Cow4ever

You're gonna honestly tell yourself that the texture work in Acts 3 and 5 are one big pixel? Or are you in serious denial?

You really need to play Gears of War 1 to understand the concept of framerate drops. Gears 3 is smooth as butter.

Gamespot posted an entire walkthrough of the campaign on youtube. Why don't you actually buy a 360 to see for yourself.

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"][QUOTE="CorbraMax"]

The point is that every one of these high end exclusives have graphical shortcomings. May it be tearing, framerate drops, jaggies, or texture pop ins. Both of these systems only have 512MB of RAM. But there are some cows on here that truly believe that the PS3 is a supercomputer with no ceiling.

CorbraMax

You lie way too much on here.

Uncharted 2 does have jaggies. And it doesdrop frames. And there are texture pop ins. The only thing it doesn't do is tear.