Sony refusing to take loss on PS4, $500-$600 price expected

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for dxmcat
dxmcat

3385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 dxmcat
Member since 2007 • 3385 Posts

PS4 will be $9001 at launch.

Avatar image for Basinboy
Basinboy

14559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#52 Basinboy
Member since 2003 • 14559 Posts

Why not just go the cell phone-plan route? You buy a device at about 1/3 of its retail price but you sign a contract for ~2 years to the providers plan (Live or PSN+)

R3FURBISHED
Actually, I sorta hope the pricing model goes this route and provides more options this way. Selling the console at what may seem an exorbitant amount ($600-$700 or more) would allow the manufacturer to avoid selling at a loss and also offer a very attractive sticker price of, say, $250-$300 (which would really spur Nintendo into action with the Wii U) with a two-year subscription to PSN or XBL (monthly price of around $15-$20). Once the two years are up, everybody is already used to paying monthly for online services and you could start to pitch a tiered service model that could range in price, either monthly or annually. Works for Sony implementing the pay system without totally pissing off their userbase and allows MS to increase their profit margins for XBL (though it may require a long-term perspective to flirt with this kind of pricing structure).
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#53 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
People paid that for a PS3 so...
Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#54 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

$500 at the absolute maximum. Theyre not going to scare people away with a $600 pricetag.

Shirokishi_

I'm thinking two SKU's: a $500 base model and a $600 premium one. It'll be not quite as hard to take as it was 7 years ago, but still too steep imo.

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#55 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts
[QUOTE="R3FURBISHED"]

Why not just go the cell phone-plan route? You buy a device at about 1/3 of its retail price but you sign a contract for ~2 years to the providers plan (Live or PSN+)

Basinboy
Actually, I sorta hope the pricing model goes this route and provides more options this way. Selling the console at what may seem an exorbitant amount ($600-$700 or more) would allow the manufacturer to avoid selling at a loss and also offer a very attractive sticker price of, say, $250-$300 (which would really spur Nintendo into action with the Wii U) with a two-year subscription to PSN or XBL (monthly price of around $15-$20). Once the two years are up, everybody is already used to paying monthly for online services and you could start to pitch a tiered service model that could range in price, either monthly or annually. Works for Sony implementing the pay system without totally pissing off their userbase and allows MS to increase their profit margins for XBL (though it may require a long-term perspective to flirt with this kind of pricing structure).

So you would get a $100 Wii U with 2 years of $10 per month or so.
Avatar image for XenogearsMaster
XenogearsMaster

3175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 XenogearsMaster
Member since 2007 • 3175 Posts
I don't blame them if they don't want to sell at a loss. It really damaged them badly with the PS3's initial price.
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51607 Posts

I remember when Sony used to care about gamers and take big losses on all their consoles. Sad to see this.

 

http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/155521-playtation-4-sony-announces-the-ps4-wont-be-sold-at-loss

robotapple
You're late and you fail.
Avatar image for Rattlesnake_8
Rattlesnake_8

18452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#58 Rattlesnake_8
Member since 2004 • 18452 Posts

I remember when Sony used to care about gamers and take big losses on all their consoles. Sad to see this.

 

http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/155521-playtation-4-sony-announces-the-ps4-wont-be-sold-at-loss

robotapple
Right.. cause Sony should obviously take a loss just because.. they are a business and need to make money. Why post stupid topics?
Avatar image for Basinboy
Basinboy

14559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#59 Basinboy
Member since 2003 • 14559 Posts
[QUOTE="Basinboy"][QUOTE="R3FURBISHED"]

Why not just go the cell phone-plan route? You buy a device at about 1/3 of its retail price but you sign a contract for ~2 years to the providers plan (Live or PSN+)

KungfuKitten
Actually, I sorta hope the pricing model goes this route and provides more options this way. Selling the console at what may seem an exorbitant amount ($600-$700 or more) would allow the manufacturer to avoid selling at a loss and also offer a very attractive sticker price of, say, $250-$300 (which would really spur Nintendo into action with the Wii U) with a two-year subscription to PSN or XBL (monthly price of around $15-$20). Once the two years are up, everybody is already used to paying monthly for online services and you could start to pitch a tiered service model that could range in price, either monthly or annually. Works for Sony implementing the pay system without totally pissing off their userbase and allows MS to increase their profit margins for XBL (though it may require a long-term perspective to flirt with this kind of pricing structure).

So you would get a $100 Wii U with 2 years of $10 per month or so.

No, for two reasons: 1) I don't care to own a Wii U & 2) I'm simply intrigued by the option of the pricing method which I think is a viable option for some and a wise business venture. A high school kid may not be able to shell out $600-$700 out of pocket initially, but $300 on contract? People already do it for phones, I don't see why not for consoles. Me though, I'm committed enough to paying more upfront than contracting to monthly payments that cost me more in the long run (actually, kinda depends on how much more). Regardless, I suspect I'll be doing it anyway in some form or another with XBL or PSN. I can't imagine Sony continuing to offer its service for free. For them, it's all about how to go about it so as to not rustle the jimmies of their fans too drastically.
Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#60 Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21107 Posts

Might as well build a decent gaming rig.

Avatar image for OneInchMan99
OneInchMan99

1248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 OneInchMan99
Member since 2012 • 1248 Posts

I remember when Sony used to care about gamers and take big losses on all their consoles. Sad to see this.

http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/155521-playtation-4-sony-announces-the-ps4-wont-be-sold-at-loss

robotapple

Day 1.Worth every penny.Thank you Sony.:)

Avatar image for StrongBlackVine
StrongBlackVine

13262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 StrongBlackVine
Member since 2012 • 13262 Posts

Might as well build a decent gaming rig.

Gaming-Planet

Do both like me.

Avatar image for Sagem28
Sagem28

10498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 Sagem28
Member since 2010 • 10498 Posts

Reading is Fundamental.

" Unlike PS3, we are not planning a major loss to be incurred with the launch of PS4 ... "

Nike_Air

We don't read on System Wars.

We just make an eye catching (and not always accurate) thread title and argue for about 20 pages.

Avatar image for StrongBlackVine
StrongBlackVine

13262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 StrongBlackVine
Member since 2012 • 13262 Posts

I think this is a very smart move. I was hoping Sony was able to get killer deal with AMD so the price of the components would not be so high. If Nintendo does one thing right is not taking massives losses every gen with hopes of ROI. Microsoft was able to offset some of their losses through Xbox Live. At least Sony isn't selling a POS like the Wii U. If it retails for $450 it may not have massive sales early, but Sony won't take massive losses either...and that is smart business decision. Sony should not have to subsidize our gaming hobbies...

Avatar image for robotapple
robotapple

780

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 robotapple
Member since 2012 • 780 Posts

I think this is a very smart move. I was hoping Sony was able to get killer deal with AMD so the price of the components would not be so high. If Nintendo does one thing right is not taking massives losses every gen with hopes of ROI. Microsoft was able to offset some of their losses through Xbox Live. At least Sony isn't selling a POS like the Wii U. If it retails for $450 it may not have massive sales early, but Sony won't take massive losses either...and that is smart business decision. Sony should not have to subsidize our gaming hobbies...

StrongBlackVine

$450 is delusional.

 

It will be between $500 and $600 and far too expensive

Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#66 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts
There will be mulitple SKU's with difference in Storage. If there are three I'd venture a guess at $300 for basic, $400 for standard, and $600 for the beast model
Avatar image for Keiji993
Keiji993

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Keiji993
Member since 2009 • 1059 Posts

Is this what journalism is now? Did anyone read the quote from Sony?

"Unlike PS3, we are not planning a major loss to be incurred with the launch of PS4. At the time we developed PS3, we made a lot of in-house investments to develop the chip, the Cell chip This time, yes we have a team working on chip development, but we already have existing technology to incorporate and also product investment and all the facilities will now be invested by our partners, other foundries, so we dont have to make all the investment in-house."

Look at the title of the article "Play$tation 4: Sony announces the PS4 wont be sold at loss"

I can't stand the media.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

It will not be $600. It absolutely will not cost that much. I'm gonna bet on $450.

robotapple

Xbox Infinity with subscription is said to have cheaper parts and is $500 with subscription.

 

MS is eating a loss on it too.

 

Another $599.99 PS4 is looking more likely.

 

$599 is unlikely i.e. AMD Jaguar's chip size is similar to ARM Cortex A15 and the GPU chip size is around 212 mm^2. PS4's APU chip size is similar to AMD Trinity APU.
Avatar image for mastershake575
mastershake575

8574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 mastershake575
Member since 2007 • 8574 Posts

$450 is delusional.

It will be between $500 and $600

robotapple

How is $450 delusional ? They don't have to pay the huge premium on blue ray (drive) like they did last time + they made a much cheaper choice in terms of hardware. This has been explained by many users on this thread (and yet you still scream "buh buh it will for sure be $500-600").

$450 isn't some consipracy (cheaper PC like hardware/architecture + not being as powerfull for the time as the ps3 + not having to pay out of the ass for blue ray = less price for both sony and the consumer).

Avatar image for tionmedon
tionmedon

468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 tionmedon
Member since 2006 • 468 Posts

well if sony and m$ is smart they would charge 2 tier both $699.00 and $799.00 systems........................

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
Thank god, premium hardware yet again...
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="robotapple"]

$450 is delusional.

It will be between $500 and $600

mastershake575

How is $450 delusional ? They don't have to pay the huge premium on blue ray (drive) like they did last time + they made a much cheaper choice in terms of hardware. This has been explained by many users on this thread (and yet you still scream "buh buh it will for sure be $500-600").

$450 isn't some consipracy (cheaper PC like hardware/architecture + not being as powerfull for the time as the ps3 + not having to pay out of the ass for blue ray = less price for both sony and the consumer).

PC can be cheap or expensive. Remember, AMD plans to upgrade GCN with AMD Volcanic Islands Q4 2013 and the older GCNs would attract less premium. This is the nature of PC's near annual updates. AMD has stated that both Xbox Next and PS4 would be using AMD 2013 road map IP blocks i.e. that covers AMD Southern Islands, Sea Islands and Volcanic Islands.
Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

The only quote from Sony in the article states otherwise. Lame website trying to get attention with false headlines :roll:

Unlike PS3, we are not planning a major loss to be incurred with the launch of PS4.

Avatar image for bezza2011
bezza2011

2729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#74 bezza2011
Member since 2006 • 2729 Posts

it's no way going to be as dear as the ps3, no doubt about that. they have made there system so it's cheaper, the ps3 cost so much because they used different companies for different parts, and instead there using just 1 company which makes everything cheaper and not as many people to pay out to. the price is going to be 399/499. 

Avatar image for super600
super600

33160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#75 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33160 Posts

Anywhere from $450-$550 for the PS4.This includes the expensive SKU.

Avatar image for StrongBlackVine
StrongBlackVine

13262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 StrongBlackVine
Member since 2012 • 13262 Posts

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

I think this is a very smart move. I was hoping Sony was able to get killer deal with AMD so the price of the components would not be so high. If Nintendo does one thing right is not taking massives losses every gen with hopes of ROI. Microsoft was able to offset some of their losses through Xbox Live. At least Sony isn't selling a POS like the Wii U. If it retails for $450 it may not have massive sales early, but Sony won't take massive losses either...and that is smart business decision. Sony should not have to subsidize our gaming hobbies...

robotapple

$450 is delusional.

 

It will be between $500 and $600 and far too expensive

It will not be close to $600. That would go against all the positive changes they have made with the PS4.

Avatar image for StrongBlackVine
StrongBlackVine

13262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 StrongBlackVine
Member since 2012 • 13262 Posts

well if sony and m$ is smart they would charge 2 tier both $699.00 and $799.00 systems........................

tionmedon

a

So you want the console industry to die?

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#78 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

What I find amusing about this is that even a hater like Robot has to admit that the PS4 would be worth 5-600.

Avatar image for hoplayletsplay
hoplayletsplay

983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 hoplayletsplay
Member since 2005 • 983 Posts
I reckon market share isn't as important as it once was. Given how most of the games are multiplat, you will hardly have publishers siding with you even if your console outsell the others. Unless you have a PS2 to Xbox/ Gamecube ratio of sales, which just seems rather unrealistic.
Avatar image for pelvist
pelvist

9001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#80 pelvist
Member since 2010 • 9001 Posts

Id be surprised if it isnt $600 personally. Right now, I have no intention of buying one either way.

Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd

12449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
Member since 2012 • 12449 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

It will not be $600. It absolutely will not cost that much. I'm gonna bet on $450.

robotapple

Xbox Infinity with subscription is said to have cheaper parts and is $500 with subscription.

 

MS is eating a loss on it too.

 

Another $599.99 PS4 is looking more likely.

 

The xbox has a friggin next generation kinect built in and you say cheaper parts? think man.
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#82 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts
[QUOTE="robotapple"]

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

It will not be $600. It absolutely will not cost that much. I'm gonna bet on $450.

MBirdy88

Xbox Infinity with subscription is said to have cheaper parts and is $500 with subscription.

 

MS is eating a loss on it too.

 

Another $599.99 PS4 is looking more likely.

 

The xbox has a friggin next generation kinect built in and you say cheaper parts? think man.

Current Xbox 360 doesn't fully utilize 1st gen Kinect device i.e. connect the same device with a PC(and related software).
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

I remember when Sony used to care about gamers and take big losses on all their consoles. Sad to see this.

http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/155521-playtation-4-sony-announces-the-ps4-wont-be-sold-at-loss

robotapple

HD 7850's chip size already smaller than 1st gen NVIDIA RSX.

---

1st gen NVIDIA RSX = 258 mm^2

1st gen IBM CELL = 230 mm^2

Total chip size: 488 mm^2

----

Semi-custom AMD Jaguar with 8 cores with Radeon HD 7850

AMD Jaguar CPU cores: 3.1 mm^2 + 2.1 mm^2 L2 cache = 5.2 mm^2 x 8 cores = 41.6 mm^2 (28nm process tech)

AMD Radeon HD 7850 (16 CU GpGPU) = 212 mm^2 (28nm process tech)

Total chip size: 253.6 mm^2

AMD Trinity APU's chip size is 228mm^2 (with 32nm process tech) i.e. AMD Piledriver (designed by AMD's green team) is not efficient with transistor density.

----------------

On transistors packing skills...

With 28nm process tech, AMD Radeon HD 7870 has a chip size of 212 mm^2 (packing 2.8 billion transistors) and delivers 2560 GFLOPS. Density of 13.2 billion transistors per mm^2.

Based on CELL's 115 mm^2 @ 45 nm process tech, 28 nm version of CELL would have a chip size of 71 mm^2. Density of ~3.34 million transistors per mm^2.

With 45 nm process tech, IBM Power 7, has a chip size of 567 mm^2 (packing 1.2 billion transistors). Density of ~2.12 million transistors per mm^2

With 28 nm process tech, IBM Power 7, has a chip size of 352.8 mm^2 (packing 1.2 billion transistors). Density of ~3.40 million transistors per mm^2

IBM is consistent with inferior transistors per mm^2 skills.

Avatar image for the_bi99man
the_bi99man

11465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#84 the_bi99man
Member since 2004 • 11465 Posts

Are you considering the 720 standalone model will be $500, sold at a loss by MS? 

robotapple

Are you considering that you're talking out of your ass? Seriously. Officially speaking, the "720" (if that's even what it ends up being called) doesn't even exist yet. There has been literally nothing revealed. Certainly not a retail price, and/or information regarding whether or not MS will be making a profit.

Why are you spewing a completely baseless rumor like it's freakin gospel?

Avatar image for BlbecekBobecek
BlbecekBobecek

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#85 BlbecekBobecek
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

It will not be $600. It absolutely will not cost that much. I'm gonna bet on $450.

robotapple

Xbox Infinity with subscription is said to have cheaper parts and is $500 with subscription.

 

MS is eating a loss on it too.

 

Another $599.99 PS4 is looking more likely.

 

 

In your wet dreams maybe. In reality PS4 is gonna cost 399 and 499. Causalbox is expensive because kinect is part of the package.

Avatar image for the_bi99man
the_bi99man

11465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#86 the_bi99man
Member since 2004 • 11465 Posts

"Not planning a major loss" =/= refusing to take any loss.

Learn to read, dumbass.

handssss

also this.

Avatar image for the_bi99man
the_bi99man

11465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#87 the_bi99man
Member since 2004 • 11465 Posts

 

 

 it cost around 80 or more for 8gigsTessellation

Which is dirt cheap.

after the PS4 it will become cheaper since is being manufacture in mass.Tessellation

-implying it's not already being manufactured in mass, and hasn't been for years.

:roll:

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#88 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

$250-300 GPU?

mastershake575

It was poor wording on my part (I was basically saying that the ps4's GPU was about as powerfull as a $250-300 card at launch). That won't be the case this time (the GTX 660 SC which is a tad faster than a stock 7870 will be like $140 brand new by the end of the year)

7850 (same chip as 7870 with 4 disabled CUs for yield issues) cost about $139 with 1 GB VRAM. AMD still has to pay 7870 type chip regardless if 16 or 20 CUs are working.
Avatar image for Rocker6
Rocker6

13358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Rocker6
Member since 2009 • 13358 Posts

I remember when Sony used to care about gamers and take big losses on all their consoles. Sad to see this.

 

http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/155521-playtation-4-sony-announces-the-ps4-wont-be-sold-at-loss

robotapple

From the article:

Unlike PS3, we are not planning a major loss to be incurred with the launch of PS4. At the time we developed PS3, we made a lot of in-house investments to develop the chip, the Cell chip This time, yes we have a team working on chip development, but we already have existing technology to incorporate and also product investment and all the facilities will now be invested by our partners, other foundries, so we dont have to make all the investment in-house.

Nice spin, TC!

I see premeptive lem damage control is in full swing... you're embarassing yourself!

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#90 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="robotapple"]

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

It will not be $600. It absolutely will not cost that much. I'm gonna bet on $450.

BlbecekBobecek

Xbox Infinity with subscription is said to have cheaper parts and is $500 with subscription.

MS is eating a loss on it too.

Another $599.99 PS4 is looking more likely.

In your wet dreams maybe. In reality PS4 is gonna cost 399 and 499. Causalbox is expensive because kinect is part of the package.

Kinect is not expensive.

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#91 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

RobotApple would buy a PS4 for 500-600 dollars.  I guess he was as impressed by the Playstation Meeting as everyone else was.

Avatar image for AmazonTreeBoa
AmazonTreeBoa

16745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 AmazonTreeBoa
Member since 2011 • 16745 Posts
:lol: at anybody stupid enough to actually believe the PS4 will be expensive as if Sony learned nothing from the PS3.
Avatar image for KillzoneSnake
KillzoneSnake

2761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#93 KillzoneSnake
Member since 2012 • 2761 Posts

lol this is BS. the entry level version will be 399

Avatar image for Puckhog04
Puckhog04

22814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Puckhog04
Member since 2003 • 22814 Posts

It'll bomb like PS3 did in the beginning at $600. I need a new PC, I"ll get a new PC for that. No way I'll spend $600 on a PS4. If it's $450, that's a whole nother story.

Avatar image for GrayF0X786
GrayF0X786

4185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#95 GrayF0X786
Member since 2012 • 4185 Posts

i will not be spending over £350 for the ps4 :|

if the price is over that, i will be sticking to this generation.....until Battlefield 4 for the ps4 makes me scream like a little girl, heres hoping :)

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

well if sony and m$ is smart they would charge 2 tier both $699.00 and $799.00 systems........................

tionmedon

 

How would that be smart?

People complained about the 599$ PS3 launch price so what makes you think they would settle for such price tags?

The reason why PS1 and PS2 were so successful was also the 299$ launch price tag.

Avatar image for faizan_faizan
faizan_faizan

7869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 faizan_faizan
Member since 2009 • 7869 Posts
It won't cost that much :|
Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts
[QUOTE="robotapple"]

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

It will not be $600. It absolutely will not cost that much. I'm gonna bet on $450.

MBirdy88

Xbox Infinity with subscription is said to have cheaper parts and is $500 with subscription.

 

MS is eating a loss on it too.

 

Another $599.99 PS4 is looking more likely.

 

The xbox has a friggin next generation kinect built in and you say cheaper parts? think man.

This is a key stance on why part of me thinks the lower spec rumors are true, unless of course they take a huge loss on the console. The biggie is that the Xbox doesn't do well in the east--ps4 could get a jump start because of this.
Avatar image for jhonMalcovich
jhonMalcovich

7090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 jhonMalcovich
Member since 2010 • 7090 Posts

Lol. I remember that at the start of the year, in PC vs consoles discussions, cows were claiming that PS4 will be 299. :lol:

Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts

Don't give a damn what Sony "thinks" and "hopes" ... I'm not paying more than $399 for another console.