Sony's first party games - all flash and no substance?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for thepwninator
thepwninator

8134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#52 thepwninator
Member since 2006 • 8134 Posts

[QUOTE="bingbaocao"][QUOTE="Keltoid"] Heavenly Sword was garbage though. It was a 6 hour action game that's not getting a sequel. Mass Effect is a 40+ game with RPG elements and is multiplatform. That's a poor comparison. finalfantasy94

so why is Folklore never mentioned?

Actually when topics come up like "underrated games this gen" Folklore usually appears on someones list. I dont get how this reflects quality. I mean do you want me to shove the game down your throat or something?

This is System Wars. Why not?
Avatar image for bingbaocao
bingbaocao

1852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 bingbaocao
Member since 2009 • 1852 Posts

[QUOTE="bingbaocao"][QUOTE="Keltoid"] Heavenly Sword was garbage though. It was a 6 hour action game that's not getting a sequel. Mass Effect is a 40+ game with RPG elements and is multiplatform. That's a poor comparison. finalfantasy94

so why is Folklore never mentioned?

Actually when topics come up like "underrated games this gen" Folklore usually appears on someones list. I dont get how this reflects quality. I mean do you want me to shove the game down your throat or something?

i never questioned the game's quality :? heck folklore is one of the PS3's exclusives i'm most interested in
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#54 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]

It seems to me that Sony's games just dont hold any interest in either System wars or the gaming community as a whole. If we take Killzone 2, easily the biggest blockbuster to hit the PS3 this year, and it's all but dead in just a couple of months. Halo 3 tops the Live charts week after week and is still discussed here pretty much daily, yet Killzone 2 appears to have had it's brief flash in the pan and then faded away in no time at all. I think this is because the game's graphics were its selling point. Once you'd seen it in action, admired the pretty effects and grown accustomed to them, there just isn't that much else to get you excited about the game.

Same with games like Ratchet and Clank and Uncharted. Decent enough gameplay, but real emphasis on the visuals. I think this approach adds up to generally dull games in the long-term. Take a movie like Wanted. Visually striking, and pretty fun while you're watching it, but once you're done it's completely forgettable. You dont want to go see it again. You dont want to go talk about it.

Take Little Big Planet - remember how that game was going to rule the world? What happened? It fizzled out in a matter of weeks.

I think Sony are trying to hard to convince gamers that their system is the 'premium' piece of tech by investing so much in graphics and effects, often at the behest of truly outstanding gameplay. So long as it looks fantastic, and plays competently enough, they seem happy to release the game, and people want something more than that.

EDIT:

I'm not saying Sony game suck by any means, nor is this a simple matter of total threads on system wars per day.

tok1879

. ...mmm, is Halo 3 really discussed more on SW than KZ2 these days? Because from what I see, it's quite the opposite.

Again, just rhetoric talking around a point. Dont jump on it and make this into 'which game gets the most threads per day'. That wasn't my point.
Avatar image for Keltoid
Keltoid

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Keltoid
Member since 2009 • 925 Posts
[QUOTE="Keltoid"][QUOTE="thepwninator"]The very fact that that thread even exists and comparable threads for Heavenly Sword don't is a testament to what Ninja-Hippo is saying.thepwninator
Heavenly Sword was garbage though. It was a 6 hour action game that's not getting a sequel. Mass Effect is a 40+ game with RPG elements and is multiplatform. That's a poor comparison.

Replace Heavenly Sword with Uncharted and you get the same effect without changing the argument one iota.

What? That Uncharted is an 8 hour action game whereas Mass Effect is a 40+ hour game with RPG elements and it's multiplatform? Mass Effect isnt even a first party title for Microsoft. That game can go to PS3 if Bioware (I think that's the dev) wants it too, not that I'm counting on it. PC + 360 = a larger install base than the PS3. I would expect more people to talk about Mass Effect than Uncharted, especially considering it's a longer game with more replay value.
Avatar image for Keltoid
Keltoid

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Keltoid
Member since 2009 • 925 Posts
[QUOTE="Keltoid"][QUOTE="thepwninator"]The very fact that that thread even exists and comparable threads for Heavenly Sword don't is a testament to what Ninja-Hippo is saying.bingbaocao
Heavenly Sword was garbage though. It was a 6 hour action game that's not getting a sequel. Mass Effect is a 40+ game with RPG elements and is multiplatform. That's a poor comparison.

so why is Folklore never mentioned?

Because it was garbage. And there was no "flash" about that game. Why even mention that game? It would be like me bringing up how Ninja Blade released a month ago and you see zero threads about it to counter your argument.
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts

[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"]

The only time I see halo pop up in SW is when its either sony vs ms or Halo VS KZ2 and even the crazyer Halo saved FPS genra,but besides that theres nothing els being said about it. I rather have the Halo topics and KZ2 topics kept in thier bords and not swarm over here.

Nike_Air

Same with Gears 2 , Fable 2 , Banjo , etc. The games have no staying poWAR ! They must lack substance obviously. All show , no go. Blah , blah , blah.

Gears 2? That game gets a lot, a whole lot of attention.
Avatar image for bingbaocao
bingbaocao

1852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 bingbaocao
Member since 2009 • 1852 Posts
[QUOTE="Keltoid"][QUOTE="thepwninator"][QUOTE="Keltoid"] Heavenly Sword was garbage though. It was a 6 hour action game that's not getting a sequel. Mass Effect is a 40+ game with RPG elements and is multiplatform. That's a poor comparison.

Replace Heavenly Sword with Uncharted and you get the same effect without changing the argument one iota.

What? That Uncharted is an 8 hour action game whereas Mass Effect is a 40+ hour game with RPG elements and it's multiplatform? Mass Effect isnt even a first party title for Microsoft. That game can go to PS3 if Bioware (I think that's the dev) wants it too, not that I'm counting on it. PC + 360 = a larger install base than the PS3. I would expect more people to talk about Mass Effect than Uncharted, especially considering it's a longer game with more replay value.

i can see how sales affect how many people talk about the game, but the same can't be said for game time, if this were true we would all be constantly talking about Disgaea 3
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#59 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
[QUOTE="thepwninator"] Hell-I still see people talk about Lost Odyssey quite a bit even though it came out a year ago, but, back in September, you couldn't say the same for Heavenly Sword at all. I'd almost forgotten it even existed until it was mentioned in this thread.

That's exactly what i'm talking about. And i'm not talking about EVERY game obviously (it's sad that that really needs to be pointed out, but it does), however it just seems to me that a lot of Sony's offerings lack long-term presence and appeal. Heavenly Sword is a perfect example. Huge hype before release, massive emphasis on the technology behind it, but a week after release it was a dead topic.
Avatar image for deactivated-5dd711115e664
deactivated-5dd711115e664

8956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 deactivated-5dd711115e664
Member since 2005 • 8956 Posts

It seems to me that Sony's games just dont hold any interest in either System wars or the gaming community as a whole. If we take Killzone 2, easily the biggest blockbuster to hit the PS3 this year, and it's all but dead in just a couple of months. Halo 3 tops the Live charts week after week and is still discussed here pretty much daily, yet Killzone 2 appears to have had it's brief flash in the pan and then faded away in no time at all. I think this is because the game's graphics were its selling point. Once you'd seen it in action, admired the pretty effects and grown accustomed to them, there just isn't that much else to get you excited about the game.

Same with games like Ratchet and Clank and Uncharted. Decent enough gameplay, but real emphasis on the visuals. I think this approach adds up to generally dull games in the long-term. Take a movie like Wanted. Visually striking, and pretty fun while you're watching it, but once you're done it's completely forgettable. You dont want to go see it again. You dont want to go talk about it.

Take Little Big Planet - remember how that game was going to rule the world? What happened? It fizzled out in a matter of weeks.

I think Sony are trying to hard to convince gamers that their system is the 'premium' piece of tech by investing so much in graphics and effects, often at the behest of truly outstanding gameplay. So long as it looks fantastic, and plays competently enough, they seem happy to release the game, and people want something more than that.

EDIT:

I'm not saying Sony game suck by any means, nor is this a simple matter of total threads on system wars per day.

Ninja-Hippo

I couldn't possibly disagree more. Uncharted, Ratchet and Clank (which recently got an expansion), Killzone 2, Little Big Planet STILL has plenty of people playing and making new levels.

If you ask me, your arguement doesn't prove that Sony games are all flash and no substance. What it tells me is that Sony is putting out lots of games that appeal to a wide audience. The fact that everyone still worships and plays Halo 3 all the time, tells me less about the quality/substance of Halo than it tells me about the overall 360 library and/or its audience.

Avatar image for bingbaocao
bingbaocao

1852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 bingbaocao
Member since 2009 • 1852 Posts
[QUOTE="Keltoid"][QUOTE="bingbaocao"][QUOTE="Keltoid"] Heavenly Sword was garbage though. It was a 6 hour action game that's not getting a sequel. Mass Effect is a 40+ game with RPG elements and is multiplatform. That's a poor comparison.

so why is Folklore never mentioned?

Because it was garbage. And there was no "flash" about that game. Why even mention that game? It would be like me bringing up how Ninja Blade released a month ago and you see zero threads about it to counter your argument.

i was comparing Lost Odyssey with Folklore, both are in the same genre, both scored almost the same on GR and metacritic. One is mentioned in every RPG and JRPG thread the other one is hardly mentioned, at best folklore is mentioned in an underrated games topic
Avatar image for Keltoid
Keltoid

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Keltoid
Member since 2009 • 925 Posts
[QUOTE="Nike_Air"]

[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"]

The only time I see halo pop up in SW is when its either sony vs ms or Halo VS KZ2 and even the crazyer Halo saved FPS genra,but besides that theres nothing els being said about it. I rather have the Halo topics and KZ2 topics kept in thier bords and not swarm over here.

IronBass

Same with Gears 2 , Fable 2 , Banjo , etc. The games have no staying poWAR ! They must lack substance obviously. All show , no go. Blah , blah , blah.

Gears 2? That game gets a lot, a whole lot of attention.

It's like Uncharted, it receives attention for being a graphics king, but it doesnt get a whole lot of System Wars attention for gameplay much. Most of the times you see "Gears 2" on here it's being brought into a graphics discussion.
Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

[QUOTE="Nike_Air"]

[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"]

The only time I see halo pop up in SW is when its either sony vs ms or Halo VS KZ2 and even the crazyer Halo saved FPS genra,but besides that theres nothing els being said about it. I rather have the Halo topics and KZ2 topics kept in thier bords and not swarm over here.

IronBass

Same with Gears 2 , Fable 2 , Banjo , etc. The games have no staying poWAR ! They must lack substance obviously. All show , no go. Blah , blah , blah.

Gears 2? That game gets a lot, a whole lot of attention.

To be honest I havent seen Gears 2 mention on SW for a good while. THe last time I heard it mention was about crappy the online was compared to part 1 and thats it.

Avatar image for Keltoid
Keltoid

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Keltoid
Member since 2009 • 925 Posts
[QUOTE="bingbaocao"][QUOTE="Keltoid"][QUOTE="bingbaocao"] so why is Folklore never mentioned?

Because it was garbage. And there was no "flash" about that game. Why even mention that game? It would be like me bringing up how Ninja Blade released a month ago and you see zero threads about it to counter your argument.

i was comparing Lost Odyssey with Folklore, both are in the same genre, both scored almost the same on GR and metacritic. One is mentioned in every RPG and JRPG thread the other one is hardly mentioned, at best folklore is mentioned in an underrated games topic

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasnt LO developed by Square Enix? Folklore was developed by Game Republic.... the Genji devs. What do you expect?
Avatar image for Giancar
Giancar

19160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Giancar
Member since 2006 • 19160 Posts
[QUOTE="Keltoid"][QUOTE="thepwninator"]The very fact that that thread even exists and comparable threads for Heavenly Sword don't is a testament to what Ninja-Hippo is saying.bingbaocao
Heavenly Sword was garbage though. It was a 6 hour action game that's not getting a sequel. Mass Effect is a 40+ game with RPG elements and is multiplatform. That's a poor comparison.

so why is Folklore never mentioned?

the same reason as BD...both sucked
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#68 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
Did I miss sumthing? KZ2 is dead? Then who am i playing with online? :?
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#69 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
[QUOTE="danish-death"] When you say "all flash and no substance" you basicly says that the games are pretty but lacks any decent gameplay - which is not true. If this wasn't what you meant, you should change you thread title as it'll be misleading to alot of people..

Says who? Why does all flash and no substance mean the gameplay sucks? If people want to post based off the topic title, that's their choice. If you actually read the post, which is very reasonable in terms of length, i said quite clearly that the gameplay in these games isn't BAD by any means, but it's competent. Much like Wanted - a competent storyline, nothing really special or amazing - but wrapped up in visual splendor. Also, yes i did show you my opinion. That's what discussion forums are for. ;)
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#70 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
Did I miss sumthing? KZ2 is dead? Then who am i playing with online? :?II_Seraphim_II
I dont know, what thread did you read that in?
Avatar image for bingbaocao
bingbaocao

1852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 bingbaocao
Member since 2009 • 1852 Posts
[QUOTE="Keltoid"][QUOTE="bingbaocao"][QUOTE="Keltoid"] Because it was garbage. And there was no "flash" about that game. Why even mention that game? It would be like me bringing up how Ninja Blade released a month ago and you see zero threads about it to counter your argument.

i was comparing Lost Odyssey with Folklore, both are in the same genre, both scored almost the same on GR and metacritic. One is mentioned in every RPG and JRPG thread the other one is hardly mentioned, at best folklore is mentioned in an underrated games topic

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasnt LO developed by Square Enix? Folklore was developed by Game Republic.... the Genji devs. What do you expect?

LO was developed by Mistwalker, a studio which was created this gen and whose previous game was blue dragon
Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"]

[QUOTE="bingbaocao"] so why is Folklore never mentioned?thepwninator

Actually when topics come up like "underrated games this gen" Folklore usually appears on someones list. I dont get how this reflects quality. I mean do you want me to shove the game down your throat or something?

This is System Wars. Why not?

Cause I dont like shoving games down peoples throat or the same being done to me. It either gets bothersome or makes the person who hasint played it have godly high expectation of the game that just cant be met and makes the experiance just disapointing.

Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts
TC, you have an opinion and mine is different than yours, plain and simple. One thing is 100% from my point of view which is saying "Sony's first party games", in fact some of them are quite great, others are meh, same for every available system in the world.
Avatar image for deactivated-5dd711115e664
deactivated-5dd711115e664

8956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 deactivated-5dd711115e664
Member since 2005 • 8956 Posts

[QUOTE="thepwninator"]The very fact that that thread even exists and comparable threads for Heavenly Sword don't is a testament to what Ninja-Hippo is saying.Keltoid
Heavenly Sword was garbage though. It was a 6 hour action game that's not getting a sequel. Mass Effect is a 40+ game with RPG elements and is multiplatform. That's a poor comparison.

Heavenly Sword was far from garbage, sir. Sure, it was 5 hours long..almost half of which was cut-scenes. But in all my years of gaming, it ranks near the very top for being a quality product that did everything RIGHT. Story, gameplay, graphics, creating a compelling world and characters. Everything about HS was BANG ON, and nobody can argue otherwise and be considered credible.

The only single thing the game had working against it was its extremely short length which meant nobody bought it.

To say it was garbage only tells me you never played the game.

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
[QUOTE="Keltoid"][ It's like Uncharted, it receives attention for being a graphics king, but it doesnt get a whole lot of System Wars attention for gameplay much. Most of the times you see "Gears 2" on here it's being brought into a graphics discussion.

Oh no, not even close. Gears 2 is in pretty much everybody's mind.
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#76 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
Why do people keep saying 'you're wrong, i play with lots of people online!' At what point did i say these games have nobody playing online? When did i say nobody makes new levels for LBP any more? Where are you getting these arguements from?
Avatar image for Keltoid
Keltoid

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Keltoid
Member since 2009 • 925 Posts
[QUOTE="bingbaocao"][QUOTE="Keltoid"][QUOTE="bingbaocao"] i was comparing Lost Odyssey with Folklore, both are in the same genre, both scored almost the same on GR and metacritic. One is mentioned in every RPG and JRPG thread the other one is hardly mentioned, at best folklore is mentioned in an underrated games topic

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasnt LO developed by Square Enix? Folklore was developed by Game Republic.... the Genji devs. What do you expect?

LO was developed by Mistwalker, a studio which was created this gen and whose previous game was blue dragon

Ohhh, but the Mistwalker was produced by the guy who helped create Final Fantasy. That's where I got SE from. Anyway, LO is just a better game. Folklore sucked. And again, there was no "flash" to that game. I think it pretty died on arrival.
Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#78 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts

Why do people keep saying 'you're wrong, i play with lots of people online!' At what point did i say these games have nobody playing online? When did i say nobody makes new levels for LBP any more? Where are you getting these arguements from?Ninja-Hippo

To be fair, you did say: "If we take Killzone 2, easily the biggest blockbuster to hit the PS3 this year, and it's all but dead in just a couple of months. Halo 3 tops the Live charts week after week" in your opening post.

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

Why do people keep saying 'you're wrong, i play with lots of people online!' At what point did i say these games have nobody playing online? When did i say nobody makes new levels for LBP any more? Where are you getting these arguements from?Ninja-Hippo

Proboly people are just reading ur topic wrong. I mean what I got form it was that this is about how some games just stoped being talked about on SW forums. Am I right?

Avatar image for Giancar
Giancar

19160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Giancar
Member since 2006 • 19160 Posts
[QUOTE="bingbaocao"][QUOTE="Giancar"][QUOTE="bingbaocao"] so why is Folklore never mentioned?

the same reason as BD...both sucked

well that's your opinion

yes it is
Avatar image for bingbaocao
bingbaocao

1852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 bingbaocao
Member since 2009 • 1852 Posts
[QUOTE="Keltoid"][QUOTE="bingbaocao"][QUOTE="Keltoid"] Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasnt LO developed by Square Enix? Folklore was developed by Game Republic.... the Genji devs. What do you expect?

LO was developed by Mistwalker, a studio which was created this gen and whose previous game was blue dragon

Ohhh, but the Mistwalker was produced by the guy who helped create Final Fantasy. That's where I got SE from. Anyway, LO is just a better game. Folklore sucked. And again, there was no "flash" to that game. I think it pretty died on arrival.

true, H. Sakaguchi's game may have preceeded him....
Avatar image for Keltoid
Keltoid

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Keltoid
Member since 2009 • 925 Posts

[QUOTE="Keltoid"][QUOTE="thepwninator"]The very fact that that thread even exists and comparable threads for Heavenly Sword don't is a testament to what Ninja-Hippo is saying.ZIMdoom

Heavenly Sword was garbage though. It was a 6 hour action game that's not getting a sequel. Mass Effect is a 40+ game with RPG elements and is multiplatform. That's a poor comparison.

Heavenly Sword was far from garbage, sir. Sure, it was 5 hours long..almost half of which was cut-scenes. But in all my years of gaming, it ranks near the very top for being a quality product that did everything RIGHT. Story, gameplay, graphics, creating a compelling world and characters. Everything about HS was BANG ON, and nobody can argue otherwise and be considered credible.

The only single thing the game had working against it was its extremely short length which meant nobody bought it.

To say it was garbage only tells me you never played the game.

Uh, no "sir" I did play the game. You're right, it wasnt garbage, but I found it to be pretty mediocre. I'm pretty sure for a fact I can say that not everything in HS was "bang on" and still be considered credible. :roll:

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#84 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]Why do people keep saying 'you're wrong, i play with lots of people online!' At what point did i say these games have nobody playing online? When did i say nobody makes new levels for LBP any more? Where are you getting these arguements from?Floppy_Jim

To be fair, you did say: "If we take Killzone 2, easily the biggest blockbuster to hit the PS3 this year, and it's all but dead in just a couple of months. Halo 3 tops the Live charts week after week" in your opening post.

Selective quoting ftw. Ironic that you started that sentence with 'to be fair' as well. :P
Avatar image for DarkyC
DarkyC

713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 DarkyC
Member since 2007 • 713 Posts

The answer why lems talk more about their exclusives than cows is simple. Cows have something to look forward to, so we talk about the exclusives that will be coming to the PS3. Lems however, see the vast exclusive wasteland that aproaches and talk about their past "glorys".

Avatar image for Nike_Air
Nike_Air

19737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Nike_Air
Member since 2006 • 19737 Posts

[QUOTE="Keltoid"][ It's like Uncharted, it receives attention for being a graphics king, but it doesnt get a whole lot of System Wars attention for gameplay much. Most of the times you see "Gears 2" on here it's being brought into a graphics discussion. IronBass
Oh no, not even close. Gears 2 is in pretty much everybody's mind.

Nope , people forgot about it so much that they stopped talking about it. No staying power whatsover , sorry. It lacks substance.Very shallow experience like most Microsoft published games.

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts

[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="Keltoid"][ It's like Uncharted, it receives attention for being a graphics king, but it doesnt get a whole lot of System Wars attention for gameplay much. Most of the times you see "Gears 2" on here it's being brought into a graphics discussion. Nike_Air

Oh no, not even close. Gears 2 is in pretty much everybody's mind.

Nope , people forgot about it so much that they stopped talking about it. No staying power whatsover , sorry. It lacks substance.Very shallow experience like most Microsoft published games.

Circular logic FTW.
Avatar image for Keltoid
Keltoid

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Keltoid
Member since 2009 • 925 Posts
[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="Keltoid"][ It's like Uncharted, it receives attention for being a graphics king, but it doesnt get a whole lot of System Wars attention for gameplay much. Most of the times you see "Gears 2" on here it's being brought into a graphics discussion.

Oh no, not even close. Gears 2 is in pretty much everybody's mind.

I never said it wasnt in everybody's mind, just that it usually isnt spoke about in System Wars unless you're bringing it into a "graphics discussion". Here, let me show you the most recent threads on Gears 2... Searched "Gears 2"Searched "Gears of War" I dont see alot of outside of graphic comparisons, do you?
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#89 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="Keltoid"][ It's like Uncharted, it receives attention for being a graphics king, but it doesnt get a whole lot of System Wars attention for gameplay much. Most of the times you see "Gears 2" on here it's being brought into a graphics discussion. Nike_Air

Oh no, not even close. Gears 2 is in pretty much everybody's mind.

Nope , people forgot about it so much that they stopped talking about it. No staying power whatsover , sorry. It lacks substance.Very shallow experience like most Microsoft published games.

I'd agree that interest in Gears 2 died down very quickly. The campaign was a huge improvement but overall the game was just too similar to the original, and the multiplayer ruined what didn't need altering in the first place. The rest of that post... never mind.
Avatar image for Giancar
Giancar

19160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Giancar
Member since 2006 • 19160 Posts

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]Why do people keep saying 'you're wrong, i play with lots of people online!' At what point did i say these games have nobody playing online? When did i say nobody makes new levels for LBP any more? Where are you getting these arguements from?Floppy_Jim

To be fair, you did say: "If we take Killzone 2, easily the biggest blockbuster to hit the PS3 this year, and it's all but dead in just a couple of months. Halo 3 tops the Live charts week after week" in your opening post.

this posts sums pretty good your question besides you state that game like Uncharted have "decent enough" gameplay aspects, when I find the gameplay of it pretty awesome, same as KZ2 Sony have focused in both aspects, gameplay and graphics, which it is just great So I couldn't disagree more with the TC thread...
Avatar image for Nike_Air
Nike_Air

19737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Nike_Air
Member since 2006 • 19737 Posts

[QUOTE="Nike_Air"]

[QUOTE="IronBass"] Oh no, not even close. Gears 2 is in pretty much everybody's mind.IronBass

Nope , people forgot about it so much that they stopped talking about it. No staying power whatsover , sorry. It lacks substance.Very shallow experience like most Microsoft published games.

Circular logic FTW.

I'm here to enlighten.

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
[QUOTE="Keltoid"] I never said it wasnt in everybody's mind, just that it usually isnt spoke about in System Wars unless you're bringing it into a "graphics discussion". Here, let me show you the most recent threads on Gears 2... Searched "Gears 2"Searched "Gears of War" I dont see alot of outside of graphic comparisons, do you?

As the Tc said, this is not about which game gets more threads.
Avatar image for Keltoid
Keltoid

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 Keltoid
Member since 2009 • 925 Posts
[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]Why do people keep saying 'you're wrong, i play with lots of people online!' At what point did i say these games have nobody playing online? When did i say nobody makes new levels for LBP any more? Where are you getting these arguements from?Ninja-Hippo

To be fair, you did say: "If we take Killzone 2, easily the biggest blockbuster to hit the PS3 this year, and it's all but dead in just a couple of months. Halo 3 tops the Live charts week after week" in your opening post.

Selective quoting ftw. Ironic that you started that sentence with 'to be fair' as well. :P

To be fair... :lol:... I think he was just pointing out why people would connect the dots to assume you're talking about online communities.
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
I'm here to enlighten.Nike_Air
It doesn't look like it.
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#95 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
[QUOTE="Giancar"] this posts sums pretty good your question besides you state that game like Uncharted have "decent enough" gameplay aspects, when I find the gameplay of it pretty awesome, same as KZ2 Sony have focused in both aspects, gameplay and graphics, which it is just great So I couldn't disagree more with the TC thread...

I disagree. Picking out one line from a paragraph, never mind a whole post, which goes on to say much more is just silly.
Avatar image for bingbaocao
bingbaocao

1852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 bingbaocao
Member since 2009 • 1852 Posts
[QUOTE="Nike_Air"]

[QUOTE="IronBass"] Oh no, not even close. Gears 2 is in pretty much everybody's mind.IronBass

Nope , people forgot about it so much that they stopped talking about it. No staying power whatsover , sorry. It lacks substance.Very shallow experience like most Microsoft published games.

Circular logic FTW.

what exactly is circular logic? Wikipedia isn't doing it for me :?
Avatar image for Nike_Air
Nike_Air

19737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 Nike_Air
Member since 2006 • 19737 Posts

[QUOTE="Nike_Air"]I'm here to enlighten.IronBass
It doesn't look like it.

I'm not surprised.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#98 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
[QUOTE="bingbaocao"] what exactly is circular logic? Wikipedia isn't doing it for me :?

Using the word 'because' or something similar to connect two pieces of logic, the second of which does nothing to confirm the first, while speaking as though it does. For example, if i were to say 'European cars are really bad because european cars are awful'. The logic i'm trying to use to back up my opinion is just a repeat of my opinion. There's no real logic there at all.
Avatar image for Keltoid
Keltoid

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Keltoid
Member since 2009 • 925 Posts
[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="Keltoid"] I never said it wasnt in everybody's mind, just that it usually isnt spoke about in System Wars unless you're bringing it into a "graphics discussion". Here, let me show you the most recent threads on Gears 2... Searched "Gears 2"Searched "Gears of War" I dont see alot of outside of graphic comparisons, do you?

As the Tc said, this is not about which game gets more threads.

Uh, I know, but you replied to me. I said... "It's like Uncharted, it receives attention for being a graphics king, but ***it doesnt get a whole lot of System Wars*** attention for gameplay much. Most of the times you see "Gears 2" on here it's being brought into a graphics discussion. And you said "Oh no, not even close." What I said WAS about System Wars, and I showed you evidence that what I said was true.
Avatar image for Giancar
Giancar

19160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 Giancar
Member since 2006 • 19160 Posts
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="Giancar"] this posts sums pretty good your question besides you state that game like Uncharted have "decent enough" gameplay aspects, when I find the gameplay of it pretty awesome, same as KZ2 Sony have focused in both aspects, gameplay and graphics, which it is just great So I couldn't disagree more with the TC thread...

I disagree. Picking out one line from a paragraph, never mind a whole post, which goes on to say much more is just silly.

ok, how do you meassure the "general enthusiasm" for certain game cause your thread states that 1st Sony games have it a "general enthusiasm" declining cause "Sony focused more in garphics than gameplay" how do you meassure it?