The X360 port of Dark Souls is heavily compressed to stay on one disc

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for arredondo
arredondo

703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 arredondo
Member since 2004 • 703 Posts

PS3 version is the lead platform:

When Demon's Souls was released several years ago by Atlus in North America, it was a PS3 exclusive. With the follow up title, Dark Souls coming this year, it will no longer be a PS3 exclusive title as a Xbox 360 version is coming as well. Now, the big question is, which of the two versions is better?

While playing the demo of Dark Souls at the Namco Bandai booth today at the E3 show floor, one of the questions I asked to the Namco Bandai representative is to what are the sacrifices From Software had to do in order to put it on the Xbox 360. A simple answer given to us is, "a lot of compression has to be done on the Xbox 360 to make it stay on a single disc".

Avatar image for Snugenz
Snugenz

13388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Snugenz
Member since 2006 • 13388 Posts

Thanks for the information, though i'm struggling to find how it would be interesting ...

Avatar image for KevinButlerVP
KevinButlerVP

2378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 KevinButlerVP
Member since 2010 • 2378 Posts
that's why DVD is a last gen format
Avatar image for The_RedLion
The_RedLion

1942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 The_RedLion
Member since 2009 • 1942 Posts
that's why DVD is a last gen formatKevinButlerVP
what has your post to do with the article?
Avatar image for Nintendonly
Nintendonly

1409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Nintendonly
Member since 2009 • 1409 Posts

[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"]that's why DVD is a last gen formatThe_RedLion
what has your post to do with the article?

I'd assume the fact the Xbox 360 version has to be compressed onto one DVD would be the clue.

Avatar image for The_RedLion
The_RedLion

1942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 The_RedLion
Member since 2009 • 1942 Posts

[QUOTE="The_RedLion"][QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"]that's why DVD is a last gen formatNintendonly

what has your post to do with the article?

I'd assume the fact the Xbox 360 version has to be compressed onto one DVD would be the clue.

yes and? compression is vital in game development that doesn't make it last gen or anything
Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
Good, so it fits on one DVD, I don't see the problem.
Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts
[QUOTE="The_RedLion"][QUOTE="Nintendonly"]

what has your post to do with the article?The_RedLion

I'd assume the fact the Xbox 360 version has to be compressed onto one DVD would be the clue.

yes and? compression is vital in game development that doesn't make it last gen or anything

then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray.
Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70153 Posts

[QUOTE="The_RedLion"][QUOTE="Nintendonly"]

I'd assume the fact the Xbox 360 version has to be compressed onto one DVD would be the clue.

sethman410

yes and? compression is vital in game development that doesn't make it last gen or anything

then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray.

because blu ray has more storage capacity. :|

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="The_RedLion"][QUOTE="Nintendonly"]

I'd assume the fact the Xbox 360 version has to be compressed onto one DVD would be the clue.

sethman410

yes and? compression is vital in game development that doesn't make it last gen or anything

then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray.

*laughs hard* do you know that a game truely uncompressed wouldn't fit on even a 10 layer bluray? compression is a natural function of games without it every thing would be drastically large, and not only that wouldn't even play cause the ram would fill up.

P.S: and I just thought of the load times even with a required install the game would take hours to load.

Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts

[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="The_RedLion"] yes and? compression is vital in game development that doesn't make it last gen or anythingCaseyWegner

then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray.

because blu ray has more storage capacity. :|

yes, thanks for the answer. thats why dvd is last gen....lol. is this hard?
Avatar image for timmy00
timmy00

15360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#12 timmy00
Member since 2006 • 15360 Posts

Yeah... What's the problem here?

Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts

[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="The_RedLion"] yes and? compression is vital in game development that doesn't make it last gen or anythingWilliamRLBaker

then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray.

*laughs hard* do you know that a game truely uncompressed wouldn't fit on even a 10 layer bluray? compression is a natural function of games without it every thing would be drastically large, and not only that wouldn't even play cause the ram would fill up.

ok buddy, then why does blu ray version of dark souls have less compressed data than dvd version?
Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#14 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts

Thanks for the information, though i'm struggling to find how it would be interesting ...

Snugenz

Oh....this definitely interested you *wink wink*

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

[QUOTE="sethman410"] then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray.sethman410

*laughs hard* do you know that a game truely uncompressed wouldn't fit on even a 10 layer bluray? compression is a natural function of games without it every thing would be drastically large, and not only that wouldn't even play cause the ram would fill up.

ok buddy, then why does blu ray version of dark souls have less compressed data than dvd version?

""then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray."" you didn't say less compressed you said compressed at all.

Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts
[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

*laughs hard* do you know that a game truely uncompressed wouldn't fit on even a 10 layer bluray? compression is a natural function of games without it every thing would be drastically large, and not only that wouldn't even play cause the ram would fill up.

ok buddy, then why does blu ray version of dark souls have less compressed data than dvd version?

""then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray."" you didn't say less compressed you said compressed at all.

ok, if only you read the posts above... my point is, dvd is last gen format cuz it has less storage space thus more compressed data. this make any sense?
Avatar image for The_RedLion
The_RedLion

1942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 The_RedLion
Member since 2009 • 1942 Posts

[QUOTE="The_RedLion"][QUOTE="Nintendonly"]

I'd assume the fact the Xbox 360 version has to be compressed onto one DVD would be the clue.

sethman410

yes and? compression is vital in game development that doesn't make it last gen or anything

then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray.

because blu ray has more storage?

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#18 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
And only but the most hardcore of audio- and video-philes with $25K+ setups gave a care.
Avatar image for The_RedLion
The_RedLion

1942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 The_RedLion
Member since 2009 • 1942 Posts
[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

ok buddy, then why does blu ray version of dark souls have less compressed data than dvd version?sethman410
""then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray."" you didn't say less compressed you said compressed at all.

ok, if only you read the posts above... my point is, dvd is last gen format cuz it has less storage space thus more compressed data. this make any sense?

it doesn't make sense having less storage doesn't automatically make you last gen it only means ms didn't charge $600 for their console in order to win a format war
Avatar image for Snugenz
Snugenz

13388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Snugenz
Member since 2006 • 13388 Posts

[QUOTE="Snugenz"]

Thanks for the information, though i'm struggling to find how it would be interesting ...

FIipMode

Oh....this definitely interested you *wink wink*

I'm vaguely interested in why someone would find it interesting ...

So go wink yourself :P

Avatar image for Giant_Panda
Giant_Panda

982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Giant_Panda
Member since 2007 • 982 Posts

So is itcompressed to the point where it noticeably effects performance?

Avatar image for Wiimotefan
Wiimotefan

4151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Wiimotefan
Member since 2010 • 4151 Posts

[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="The_RedLion"] yes and? compression is vital in game development that doesn't make it last gen or anythingThe_RedLion

then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray.

because blu ray has more storage?

Does the correlation between compression and lossy data mean anything to you?

Avatar image for omho88
omho88

3967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 omho88
Member since 2007 • 3967 Posts

lol, I was just having a discusion with Casey Wenger on how important Bluray is ... I guess this thread will be useful if I talked to him again.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

[QUOTE="sethman410"] ok buddy, then why does blu ray version of dark souls have less compressed data than dvd version?sethman410

""then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray."" you didn't say less compressed you said compressed at all.

ok, if only you read the posts above... my point is, dvd is last gen format cuz it has less storage space thus more compressed data. this make any sense?

I dont need to look at the posts above. I need only look at the one post you replied too and that is compression is vital to game development. you replied that on bluray no game requires compression this is completely an utterly false games wouldn't fit on current bluray levels, in ram, and would require hours of load time with absolutely no compression.

Compression does not make dvd a last generation format since compression is even used today.

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#25 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts

[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="The_RedLion"] yes and? compression is vital in game development that doesn't make it last gen or anythingWilliamRLBaker

then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray.

*laughs hard* do you know that a game truely uncompressed wouldn't fit on even a 10 layer bluray? compression is a natural function of games without it every thing would be drastically large, and not only that wouldn't even play cause the ram would fill up.

P.S: and I just thought of the load times even with a required install the game would take hours to load.

Pretty much this, i'd love if someone would come along and give an uncompressed evaluation of a game.. any game. Hell i recon even Super Mario 64 would weigh in about 10gig uncompressed.
Avatar image for MrSelf-Destruct
MrSelf-Destruct

13400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 MrSelf-Destruct
Member since 2010 • 13400 Posts

[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="The_RedLion"] yes and? compression is vital in game development that doesn't make it last gen or anythingWilliamRLBaker

then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray.

*laughs hard* do you know that a game truely uncompressed wouldn't fit on even a 10 layer bluray? compression is a natural function of games without it every thing would be drastically large, and not only that wouldn't even play cause the ram would fill up.

P.S: and I just thought of the load times even with a required install the game would take hours to load.

Hell yeah, man. If you decompressed Angry Birds to the fullest you'd need like 20 blu ray discs or something. lol
Avatar image for omho88
omho88

3967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 omho88
Member since 2007 • 3967 Posts

[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"] ""then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray."" you didn't say less compressed you said compressed at all.

WilliamRLBaker

ok, if only you read the posts above... my point is, dvd is last gen format cuz it has less storage space thus more compressed data. this make any sense?

I dont need to look at the posts above. I need only look at the one post you replied too and that is compression is vital to game development. you replied that on bluray no game requires compression this is completely an utterly false games wouldn't fit on current bluray levels, in ram, and would require hours of load time with absolutely no compression.

Compression does not make dvd a last generation format since compression is even used today.

Dude, use some logic, you dun have to waste ur time and ours debating something considered like gravity ..... bigger space>>smaller space ..... The end.

Avatar image for Wiimotefan
Wiimotefan

4151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Wiimotefan
Member since 2010 • 4151 Posts

lol, I was just having a discusion with Casey Wenger on how important Bluray is ... I guess this thread will be useful if I talked to him again.

omho88

Probably not.

Realistically though, BR has not been THAT important this gen. Going with DVD as a disc format for next gen consoles would be suicide for Sony or MS, but this gen isn't such a biggie. If the PS3 had been a megaton seller and more games were developed to its strengths, then maybe it would have, but that is not how it turned out.

Avatar image for Yrkoon99
Yrkoon99

494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Yrkoon99
Member since 2007 • 494 Posts

how can dvd be a last gen format when it has the witcher 2 and crysis?

Avatar image for MetroidPrimePwn
MetroidPrimePwn

12399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#30 MetroidPrimePwn
Member since 2007 • 12399 Posts

If the compression is lossless or relatively non-lossy, it doesn't matter at all. If it matters at all, it's probably not that much.

Avatar image for omho88
omho88

3967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 omho88
Member since 2007 • 3967 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

[QUOTE="sethman410"] then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray.JohnF111

*laughs hard* do you know that a game truely uncompressed wouldn't fit on even a 10 layer bluray? compression is a natural function of games without it every thing would be drastically large, and not only that wouldn't even play cause the ram would fill up.

P.S: and I just thought of the load times even with a required install the game would take hours to load.

Pretty much this, i'd love if someone would come along and give an uncompressed evaluation of a game.. any game. Hell i recon even Super Mario 64 would weigh in about 10gig uncompressed.

FFXIII is a good exmaple ..... the quality of the CGI is clearly better on the PS3 ..... you can read that on any gaming site.

Avatar image for The_RedLion
The_RedLion

1942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 The_RedLion
Member since 2009 • 1942 Posts

lol, I was just having a discusion with Casey Wenger on how important Bluray is ... I guess this thread will be useful if I talked to him again.

omho88
to prove him right it shows how little importance blu ray has
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#33 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
[QUOTE="sethman410"] my point is, dvd is last gen format cuz it has less storage space thus more compressed data. this make any sense?

And all the storage space in the world doesn't mean anything if the ROM drive streams the data too slowly for the CPU and GPU to keep up the action. Like in the PS3 where many developers have to install data to the hard disk in order to make loading times shorter than a quarter-century. Because hard disks stream data at rates optical discs could not even fathom. Which is why optical storage is becoming a thing of the past. USB 3.0 is going to be a data-streaming revolution... all other storage formats are going to cry, shake in their boots and wet themselves... all at the same time at the sight of its blazing speed.
Avatar image for omho88
omho88

3967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 omho88
Member since 2007 • 3967 Posts

[QUOTE="omho88"]

lol, I was just having a discusion with Casey Wenger on how important Bluray is ... I guess this thread will be useful if I talked to him again.

Wiimotefan

Probably not.

Realistically though, BR has not been THAT important this gen. Going with DVD as a disc format for next gen consoles would be suicide for Sony or MS, but this gen isn't such a biggie. If the PS3 had been a megaton seller and more games were developed to its strengths, then maybe it would have, but that is not how it turned out.

I guess so, but like I said to him, it's important not mandatory ..... games like U, GOW, KZ, remastered collections and others make use of that advantage .... so it's important for them.

Avatar image for VensInferno
VensInferno

3395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#36 VensInferno
Member since 2010 • 3395 Posts

Rejoice Xbox Users! :P

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="JohnF111"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

*laughs hard* do you know that a game truely uncompressed wouldn't fit on even a 10 layer bluray? compression is a natural function of games without it every thing would be drastically large, and not only that wouldn't even play cause the ram would fill up.

P.S: and I just thought of the load times even with a required install the game would take hours to load.

omho88

Pretty much this, i'd love if someone would come along and give an uncompressed evaluation of a game.. any game. Hell i recon even Super Mario 64 would weigh in about 10gig uncompressed.

FFXIII is a good exmaple ..... the quality of the CGI is clearly better on the PS3 ..... you can read that on any gaming site.

the majority of resolution and quality issues in FF13 was because of development time and not dvd size this is a simple fact. Given a few months more instead of the under a year time they gave themselves to port the game to the 360 they could have maintained 720p accross gameplay and CGI.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

[QUOTE="sethman410"] ok, if only you read the posts above... my point is, dvd is last gen format cuz it has less storage space thus more compressed data. this make any sense?omho88

I dont need to look at the posts above. I need only look at the one post you replied too and that is compression is vital to game development. you replied that on bluray no game requires compression this is completely an utterly false games wouldn't fit on current bluray levels, in ram, and would require hours of load time with absolutely no compression.

Compression does not make dvd a last generation format since compression is even used today.

Dude, use some logic, you dun have to waste ur time and ours debating something considered like gravity ..... bigger space>>smaller space ..... The end.

Except the text is on the wall your argument. Bluray does not require compression. Proven wrong? I would say so. Stop trying to back track and claim you didn't make the claim when you most obviously did.

Avatar image for The_RedLion
The_RedLion

1942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 The_RedLion
Member since 2009 • 1942 Posts
[QUOTE="omho88"]

[QUOTE="Wiimotefan"]

[QUOTE="omho88"]

lol, I was just having a discusion with Casey Wenger on how important Bluray is ... I guess this thread will be useful if I talked to him again.

Probably not.

Realistically though, BR has not been THAT important this gen. Going with DVD as a disc format for next gen consoles would be suicide for Sony or MS, but this gen isn't such a biggie. If the PS3 had been a megaton seller and more games were developed to its strengths, then maybe it would have, but that is not how it turned out.

I guess so, but like I said to him, it's important not mandatory ..... games like U, GOW, KZ, remastered collections and others make use of that advantage .... so it's important for them.

3-5 games and remakes? lol, it's even less important than I thought
Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts

[QUOTE="omho88"]

[QUOTE="JohnF111"] Pretty much this, i'd love if someone would come along and give an uncompressed evaluation of a game.. any game. Hell i recon even Super Mario 64 would weigh in about 10gig uncompressed.WilliamRLBaker

FFXIII is a good exmaple ..... the quality of the CGI is clearly better on the PS3 ..... you can read that on any gaming site.

the majority of resolution and quality issues in FF13 was because of development time and not dvd size this is a simple fact. Given a few months more instead of the under a year time they gave themselves to port the game to the 360 they could have maintained 720p accross gameplay and CGI.

baker... do u even know what this thread first started was about? it was about dark souls having more compression data on the 360 version than the ps3 version. meaning more quality for the ps3 version. but it probably won't be THAT much different like ff13.

edit: what i meant that its gonna be like ff13 all over again.

Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#41 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

Dang, it's been 6 years since X360's launch

Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7061 Posts

Ummmm....yah, well, ummmm, every game is compressed heavily to fit on adisc; obviously more so on DVD than BD.Consequently, Ifail to see the point of the statement.

Avatar image for The_RedLion
The_RedLion

1942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 The_RedLion
Member since 2009 • 1942 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

[QUOTE="omho88"]

FFXIII is a good exmaple ..... the quality of the CGI is clearly better on the PS3 ..... you can read that on any gaming site.

sethman410

the majority of resolution and quality issues in FF13 was because of development time and not dvd size this is a simple fact. Given a few months more instead of the under a year time they gave themselves to port the game to the 360 they could have maintained 720p accross gameplay and CGI.

baker... do u even know what this thread first started was about? it was about dark souls having more compression data on the 360 version than the ps3 version. meaning more quality for the ps3 version. but it probably won't be THAT much different like ff13.

what.

who said less compresions means more quality? all 360 games have to be more compressed than ps3 games, yet the 360 gets the better version of most multiplats; compression and quality aren't necessarily related

Avatar image for MrSelf-Destruct
MrSelf-Destruct

13400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 MrSelf-Destruct
Member since 2010 • 13400 Posts

[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"] the majority of resolution and quality issues in FF13 was because of development time and not dvd size this is a simple fact. Given a few months more instead of the under a year time they gave themselves to port the game to the 360 they could have maintained 720p accross gameplay and CGI.

The_RedLion

baker... do u even know what this thread first started was about? it was about dark souls having more compression data on the 360 version than the ps3 version. meaning more quality for the ps3 version. but it probably won't be THAT much different like ff13.

who said less compresions means less quality? all 360 games have to be more compressed than ps3 games, yet the 360 gets the better version of most multiplats compression and quality aren't necessarily related

Very true. It takes a pretty substantial amount of compression for anyone to notice, and even then you'd have to be some hell-bent audiophile with $300 Sennheiser's to find anything to b*** about. Too much video compression can turn a CGI movie into a pixelated mess, but those seem pretty standard today anyway. Just look at the ones in Mass Effect 2. Ugh.

Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts

[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"] the majority of resolution and quality issues in FF13 was because of development time and not dvd size this is a simple fact. Given a few months more instead of the under a year time they gave themselves to port the game to the 360 they could have maintained 720p accross gameplay and CGI.

The_RedLion

baker... do u even know what this thread first started was about? it was about dark souls having more compression data on the 360 version than the ps3 version. meaning more quality for the ps3 version. but it probably won't be THAT much different like ff13.

what.

who said less compresions means less quality? all 360 games have to be more compressed than ps3 games, yet the 360 gets the better version of most multiplats; compression and quality aren't necessarily related

problem is, this one is heavily compressed and im sure ps3 version are better in some areas in those "superior multiplats".

EDIT: Oh,more compression=less quality is actually true rather 360 versions prove it or not. because in those "superior mulitplats" where 360 has more compression, it just because it's not enough compression to make a noticable difference. still, more compression=lesss quality.

Avatar image for omho88
omho88

3967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 omho88
Member since 2007 • 3967 Posts

[QUOTE="omho88"]

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

I dont need to look at the posts above. I need only look at the one post you replied too and that is compression is vital to game development. you replied that on bluray no game requires compression this is completely an utterly false games wouldn't fit on current bluray levels, in ram, and would require hours of load time with absolutely no compression.

Compression does not make dvd a last generation format since compression is even used today.

WilliamRLBaker

Dude, use some logic, you dun have to waste ur time and ours debating something considered like gravity ..... bigger space>>smaller space ..... The end.

Except the text is on the wall your argument. Bluray does not require compression. Proven wrong? I would say so. Stop trying to back track and claim you didn't make the claim when you most obviously did.

OMG ..... my post is crystal clear and you are fabricating words and putting them in my mouth !!

Avatar image for The_RedLion
The_RedLion

1942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 The_RedLion
Member since 2009 • 1942 Posts
[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="The_RedLion"]

baker... do u even know what this thread first started was about? it was about dark souls having more compression data on the 360 version than the ps3 version. meaning more quality for the ps3 version. but it probably won't be THAT much different like ff13.sethman410

what.

who said less compresions means less quality? all 360 games have to be more compressed than ps3 games, yet the 360 gets the better version of most multiplats; compression and quality aren't necessarily related

problem is, this one is heavily compressed and im sure ps3 version are better in some areas.

what exactly does heavily compressed means? how does it differentiate of other games? how does it affect the game? can you prove anything of what you're saying? what you're sure of means nothing if you can't show proof of it
Avatar image for MrSelf-Destruct
MrSelf-Destruct

13400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 MrSelf-Destruct
Member since 2010 • 13400 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

[QUOTE="omho88"]

Dude, use some logic, you dun have to waste ur time and ours debating something considered like gravity ..... bigger space>>smaller space ..... The end.

omho88

Except the text is on the wall your argument. Bluray does not require compression. Proven wrong? I would say so. Stop trying to back track and claim you didn't make the claim when you most obviously did.

OMG ..... my post is crystal clear and you are fabricating words and putting them in my mouth !!

He pays so little attention to what he posts that he doesn't seem to realize that he's talking to someone else entirely. :lol:
Avatar image for omho88
omho88

3967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 omho88
Member since 2007 • 3967 Posts

[QUOTE="omho88"]

[QUOTE="Wiimotefan"]

Probably not.

Realistically though, BR has not been THAT important this gen. Going with DVD as a disc format for next gen consoles would be suicide for Sony or MS, but this gen isn't such a biggie. If the PS3 had been a megaton seller and more games were developed to its strengths, then maybe it would have, but that is not how it turned out.

The_RedLion

I guess so, but like I said to him, it's important not mandatory ..... games like U, GOW, KZ, remastered collections and others make use of that advantage .... so it's important for them.

3-5 games and remakes? lol, it's even less important than I thought

lol, so remasted last generation games need multiple discs now..... racing games need multiple discs ..... a game like DS2 is on mutiple discs ..... DS2 on the PS3 has an extra game on it and it's still on one bluray ... what a shame.

Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#50 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

Right now it seems like DVD's are being really dated. With digital distribution becoming so popular with services like Steam, and high capacity media like Blu-Ray it really is disappointing to hear stuff like this.

Honestly, it doesn't mean bad games, it just means a handicap to making those great games. Anyone saying that DVD's are still as good as Blu Rays or downloading services are just ignoring cases like LA Noire and RAGE (Which will also be on 3 discs from what I hear). Don't let fanboyism blind you from the truth. Its like saying the cartridge format was still viable and didn't cripple games when the PSOne was giving us full voice acting, improved voice acting and FMV. I mean, everyone loves the N64, but the cartridge format the was like the DVD format now and just was not the best choice for games.