Though I doubt it will matter, I'd still prefer multiple disks. Either way, cows will make DS PS3 > DS 360 to be something like Bayonetta 360 > Bayonetta PS3. They'll still get the same score at Gamespot though.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Though I doubt it will matter, I'd still prefer multiple disks. Either way, cows will make DS PS3 > DS 360 to be something like Bayonetta 360 > Bayonetta PS3. They'll still get the same score at Gamespot though.
ok, if only you read the posts above... my point is, dvd is last gen format cuz it has less storage space thus more compressed data. this make any sense?[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"] ""then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray."" you didn't say less compressed you said compressed at all.
WilliamRLBaker
I dont need to look at the posts above. I need only look at the one post you replied too and that is compression is vital to game development. you replied that on bluray no game requires compression this is completely an utterly false games wouldn't fit on current bluray levels, in ram, and would require hours of load time with absolutely no compression.
Compression does not make dvd a last generation format since compression is even used today.
What DOES make it a last generation format is the fact that it was the standard format for 2 out of 3 last gen consoles.
IGN crappy article.
They state the audio for 360, although they're wrong about Ps3 too. I just know 360 didn't have it when I had a 360 which was about 5 months ago.
Here we go, fom AVforusm.
"The PS3 has 7.1 support including lossless audio, while the 360 is limited to 5.1 and has no lossless audio support."
Because it doesn't. Unless MS updated teh 360, in audio, it still can't.[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="Snugenz"]
Where's you proof that the 360 doesnt do lossless compression?
Snugenz
"Because it doesn't" Best proof ever !!
Sorry but he's right. There has not been a single 360 game to date that has lossless audio and the reason is simple. It's not because the 360 can't handle it, it's because lossless audio on DVD would eat up way too much space.Example: The AUDIO ALONE on Heavenly Sword took up 10GB's which is more than an entire DVD. Of course on Bluray, that left 15GB's for the rest of the game so no problem there.
There's no way a dev will ever do lossless audio on a 360 game.
Rage, Dead Space 2, LA Noire, Mass Effect 2, Witcher 2. The list of games shipping on more then a singlle DVD is growing not shrinking. Me? I'd rather have a game on a single bluray or as we see here in the case of dark souls, waaaaaay less compression. . That's just my preference. Others, they seem not to care. Yet still others will spend hundreds or even thousands to have the lattest and greatest GPU but will rabidly defend the ancient dvd format. That's right DVD is 1997 tech. Not 2007 1997. That's 14 years bro. There are kids in high school that are younger then DVD. Time to move on.
[QUOTE="Chutebox"]
IGN crappy article.
They state the audio for 360, although they're wrong about Ps3 too. I just know 360 didn't have it when I had a 360 which was about 5 months ago.
Snugenz
Wait, what exactly are you talking about?
Updated that post and I'm talking about lossless audio.[QUOTE="Snugenz"]
[QUOTE="Chutebox"] Because it doesn't. Unless MS updated teh 360, in audio, it still can't.mztazmz
"Because it doesn't" Best proof ever !!
Sorry but he's right. There has not been a single 360 game to date that has lossless audio and the reason is simple. It's not because the 360 can't handle it, it's because lossless audio on DVD would eat up way too much space.Example: The AUDIO ALONE on Heavenly Sword took up 10GB's which is more than an entire DVD. Of course on Bluray, that left 15GB's for the rest of the game so no problem there.
There's no way a dev will ever do lossless audio on a 360 game.
But the discussion isnt about uncompressed data, its whether or not compression automatically = less quality. And correct me if i'm wrong, but there's a difference between uncompressed data and lossless compression?.
LOL! Idk why, but I thought that entire comment was funny. But that just shows how important blu ray is. Don't underetimate it, blu ray is getting faster readings these days so installations in the future will not be a problem. Blu-ray is future proof as the ps3 is. Wow, 360 and ps3 has been reversing powers these days. Seems like everything is going opposite directions for these two systems. 360 has no games, just like ps3 back in the beginning.Rage, Dead Space 2, LA Noire, Mass Effect 2, Witcher 2. The list of games shipping on more then a singlle DVD is growing not shrinking. Me? I'd rather have a game on a single bluray or as we see here in the case of dark souls, waaaaaay less compression. . That's just my preference. Others, they seem not to care. Yet still others will spend hundreds or even thousands to have the lattest and greatest GPU but will rabidly defend the ancient dvd format. That's right DVD is 1997 tech. Not 2007 1997. That's 14 years bro. There are kids in high school that are younger then DVD. Time to move on.
Pray_to_me
[QUOTE="mztazmz"]
[QUOTE="Snugenz"]
"Because it doesn't" Best proof ever !!
Sorry but he's right. There has not been a single 360 game to date that has lossless audio and the reason is simple. It's not because the 360 can't handle it, it's because lossless audio on DVD would eat up way too much space.Example: The AUDIO ALONE on Heavenly Sword took up 10GB's which is more than an entire DVD. Of course on Bluray, that left 15GB's for the rest of the game so no problem there.
There's no way a dev will ever do lossless audio on a 360 game.
But the discussion isnt about uncompressed data, its whether or not compression automatically = less quality. And correct me if i'm wrong, but there's a difference between uncompressed data and lossless compression?.
Yes, there is a difference. lossless compression just get rid of unneeded data therefore the quality stays the same. HOWEVER, my whole point was that compression=less quality MOST OF THE TIME. Just saying that if it's not lossless compression, it means lesss quality automatically no matter what.Could be a major hit on texture quality, resolution, animations, fun factor. You name it.
I'm kinda kidding about the fun factor part but not really. It's possible that so many sacrifices are made the game winds up being straight up not as fun.
Could be a major hit on texture quality, resolution, animations, fun factor. You name it.
I'm kinda kidding about the fun factor part but not really. It's possible that so many sacrifices are made the game winds up being straight up not as fun.
The reasons why games from this generation aren't as fun is because development costs are too high. Therefore, less risks being taken and therefore less fun games because there's less variety of games and more similar games. *cough fps cough* And at the same time.... most of sw warriors are favoriting this generation and yet they complain about short more boring similar games. Jesus. System wars is a fine place, what an entertainment lulz.[QUOTE="The_RedLion"][QUOTE="Nintendonly"]yes and? compression is vital in game development that doesn't make it last gen or anything then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray. But it does, that is, if they want to keep loading times low. It's faster for the CPU to decompress than to read a large amount of uncompressed data.I'd assume the fact the Xbox 360 version has to be compressed onto one DVD would be the clue.
sethman410
Good thing compression sacrifices none of the things you mentioned.Could be a major hit on texture quality, resolution, animations, fun factor. You name it.
I'm kinda kidding about the fun factor part but not really. It's possible that so many sacrifices are made the game winds up being straight up not as fun.
Pray_to_me
Could be a major hit on texture quality, resolution, animations, fun factor. You name it.
I'm kinda kidding about the fun factor part but not really. It's possible that so many sacrifices are made the game winds up being straight up not as fun.
Good thing compression sacrifices none of the things you mentioned. texture quality? I think it does for this. I agree on other ones.Could be a major hit on texture quality, resolution, animations, fun factor. You name it.
I'm kinda kidding about the fun factor part but not really. It's possible that so many sacrifices are made the game winds up being straight up not as fun.
Good thing compression sacrifices none of the things you mentioned. texture quality? I think it does for this. I agree on other ones. Not by compression. Texture quality may suffer if they decide to lower the resolution. To know why, just check what compression does to data.[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="themyth01"] Good thing compression sacrifices none of the things you mentioned. themyth01texture quality? I think it does for this. I agree on other ones. Not by compression. Texture quality may suffer if they decide to lower the resolution. To know why, just check what compression does to data. Well, what does compression sacrifice in? What areas do compression affect in?
[QUOTE="themyth01"][QUOTE="sethman410"] texture quality? I think it does for this. I agree on other ones.sethman410Not by compression. Texture quality may suffer if they decide to lower the resolution. To know why, just check what compression does to data. Well, what does compression sacrifice in? What areas do compression affect in? Didn't one of the Dragon Ages suffer on 360 a bit because they wanted it on one (or two discs)? Pretty sure textures suffered as a result. I could be wrong.
[QUOTE="themyth01"][QUOTE="sethman410"] texture quality? I think it does for this. I agree on other ones.sethman410Not by compression. Texture quality may suffer if they decide to lower the resolution. To know why, just check what compression does to data. Well, what does compression sacrifice in? What areas do compression affect in? It doesn't, compression simply uses up more CPU cycles because the data needs to be decompressed before it's processed. If the right compression algorithm is used, the data is exactly like the original. In some cases you don't want to wait for CPU decompression but for most things nowadays CPU decompression is faster than reading a large amount of data in a disc. I've implemented some compression algorithms but I think this one is simple enough even a non-CS person can understand to see what compression does: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huffman_coding
[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="themyth01"] Not by compression. Texture quality may suffer if they decide to lower the resolution. To know why, just check what compression does to data. ChuteboxWell, what does compression sacrifice in? What areas do compression affect in? Didn't one of the Dragon Ages suffer on 360 a bit because they wanted it on one (or two discs)? Pretty sure textures suffered as a result. I could be wrong.
Was it even noticeable?
Didn't one of the Dragon Ages suffer on 360 a bit because they wanted it on one (or two discs)? Pretty sure textures suffered as a result. I could be wrong.[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="sethman410"] Well, what does compression sacrifice in? What areas do compression affect in?Bebi_vegeta
Was it even noticeable?
Noticable enough to drop the scrore.
[QUOTE="Pray_to_me"]LOL! Idk why, but I thought that entire comment was funny. But that just shows how important blu ray is. Don't underetimate it, blu ray is getting faster readings these days so installations in the future will not be a problem. Blu-ray is future proof as the ps3 is. Wow, 360 and ps3 has been reversing powers these days. Seems like everything is going opposite directions for these two systems. 360 has no games, just like ps3 back in the beginning. bluray read speeds are getting faster but ... I'm not completely sure about this, the bluray drive in my ps3 hasn't changed. Still took a good 30 minutes to install BioShock the other day.Rage, Dead Space 2, LA Noire, Mass Effect 2, Witcher 2. The list of games shipping on more then a singlle DVD is growing not shrinking. Me? I'd rather have a game on a single bluray or as we see here in the case of dark souls, waaaaaay less compression. . That's just my preference. Others, they seem not to care. Yet still others will spend hundreds or even thousands to have the lattest and greatest GPU but will rabidly defend the ancient dvd format. That's right DVD is 1997 tech. Not 2007 1997. That's 14 years bro. There are kids in high school that are younger then DVD. Time to move on.
sethman410
[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]
[QUOTE="Chutebox"] Didn't one of the Dragon Ages suffer on 360 a bit because they wanted it on one (or two discs)? Pretty sure textures suffered as a result. I could be wrong.Pray_to_me
Was it even noticeable?
Noticable enough to drop the scrore.
Wow... and then people say there's no difference between console and PC games graphix wise... this is amazing.
[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]
[QUOTE="sethman410"] ok, if only you read the posts above... my point is, dvd is last gen format cuz it has less storage space thus more compressed data. this make any sense?mztazmz
I dont need to look at the posts above. I need only look at the one post you replied too and that is compression is vital to game development. you replied that on bluray no game requires compression this is completely an utterly false games wouldn't fit on current bluray levels, in ram, and would require hours of load time with absolutely no compression.
Compression does not make dvd a last generation format since compression is even used today.
What DOES make it a last generation format is the fact that it was the standard format for 2 out of 3 last gen consoles.
um you do know that makes no sense? so by your example next generation if both the 360 and ps3 use bluray that makes it a last gen technology?Yup, you're right. Compression does not make dvd a last generation format.[QUOTE="mztazmz"]
[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]
I dont need to look at the posts above. I need only look at the one post you replied too and that is compression is vital to game development. you replied that on bluray no game requires compression this is completely an utterly false games wouldn't fit on current bluray levels, in ram, and would require hours of load time with absolutely no compression.
Compression does not make dvd a last generation format since compression is even used today.WilliamRLBaker
What DOES make it a last generation format is the fact that it was the standard format for 2 out of 3 last gen consoles.
um you do know that makes no sense? so by your example next generation if both the 360 and ps3 use bluray that makes it a last gen technology?DVD is an old format. Doesn't make it a bad format or dead technology. But it is definitely last generation.I remember at the beginning of this gen everyone said that blu-ray is not needed and now 360 games are either suffering(heavy compression, lackluster textures, etc) or being put on multiple discs.
360 definitely had the upper hand with its multiplats at the start of this gen but we're definitely seeing a paradigm shift these days.
um you do know that makes no sense? so by your example next generation if both the 360 and ps3 use bluray that makes it a last gen technology?DVD is an old format. Doesn't make it a bad format or dead technology. But it is definitely last generation.[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]
[QUOTE="mztazmz"] Yup, you're right. Compression does not make dvd a last generation format.
What DOES make it a last generation format is the fact that it was the standard format for 2 out of 3 last gen consoles.
F1ame_Shie1d
I remember at the beginning of this gen everyone said that blu-ray is not needed and now 360 games are either suffering(heavy compression, lackluster textures, etc) or being put on multiple discs.
360 definitely had the upper hand with its multiplats at the start of this gen but we're definitely seeing a paradigm shift these days.
There is a major difference between it being an last generation format and saying its a last generation format for all the wrong reasons. compression doesn't make it a last generation format, it being standard doesn't make it a last generation format. I would love if people would start showing where I said it wasn't a last generation format instead of just showing people how wrong their concepts of why its a last generation format are.[QUOTE="_Matt_"]No, its because "teh blu-ray is better." :PGuys you are taking this news completely the wrong way... Because its compressed, it means this game is BIG, cannot wait!
clone01
Oh sorry, my bad, am I not getting into the system wars spirit enough? ;)
[QUOTE="sethman410"] yes, thanks for the answer. thats why dvd is last gen....lol. is this hard?Stevo_the_gamerThen... isn't Blu-ray last gen because of DD? lol I have over 100 games that I can play with just a couple clicks of a mouse. lol Physical storage and digital storage are completely different. As a physical storage choice DVD is starting to become outdated, there really isn't a way you can argue otherwise. That would be like arguing back in 2005 that VHS was still the right storage choice for movies or that CD-Rom should still be used for game storage.
However, Blu Ray may eventually have a shorter run than DVD ever did because of the advancements taking place in DD opportunities.
Different yet readily comparable under gaming and the notions behind the term "outdated" or "archaic." Physical media in its entirety is LAST GENERATION. Even if you disagree, the Blu-ray in the PS3 is outdated as f***--comparable to read speeds of an 8X DVD Drive. LOLPhysical storage and digital storage are completely different. As a physical storage choice DVD is starting to become outdated, there really isn't a way you can argue otherwise. That would be like arguing back in 2005 that VHS was still the right storage choice for movies or that CD-Rom should still be used for game storage.
However, Blu Ray may eventually have a shorter run than DVD ever did because of the advancements taking place in DD opportunities.
CajunShooter
Different yet readily comparable under gaming and the notions behind the term "outdated" or "archaic." Physical media in its entirety is LAST GENERATION. Even if you disagree, the Blu-ray in the PS3 is outdated as f***--comparable to read speeds of an 8X DVD Drive. LOL I did say that DD is starting to make Blu Ray outdated. DD still has a ways to go because of some limitations, but once it over comes them then, yes, it will make all physical media outdated.[QUOTE="CajunShooter"]
Physical storage and digital storage are completely different. As a physical storage choice DVD is starting to become outdated, there really isn't a way you can argue otherwise. That would be like arguing back in 2005 that VHS was still the right storage choice for movies or that CD-Rom should still be used for game storage.
However, Blu Ray may eventually have a shorter run than DVD ever did because of the advancements taking place in DD opportunities.
Stevo_the_gamer
My point was that defending DVD in 2011 is like defending CD-Rom in 2005.
I did say that DD is starting to make Blu Ray outdated. DD still has a ways to go because of some limitations, but once it over comes them then, yes, it will make all physical media outdated.That's because saying so would be false, it's not "starting" ... it already made it outdated quite some time ago.My point was that defending DVD in 2011 is like defending CD-Rom in 2005.
CajunShooter
it really is time for a new console MS...and Sony, Halo 4 would be a great launch title aswell, but MS seem to have committed to Kinect now so god knows what that means in terms of when they will actually get with the times and come out with some new hardware.
That's because saying so would be false, it's not "starting" ... it already made it outdated quite some time ago. Fine DD made Blu Ray outdated, but I don't see how this helps the argument that DVD isnt.[QUOTE="CajunShooter"] I did say that DD is starting to make Blu Ray outdated. DD still has a ways to go because of some limitations, but once it over comes them then, yes, it will make all physical media outdated.
My point was that defending DVD in 2011 is like defending CD-Rom in 2005.
Stevo_the_gamer
The more time I spend in this...place...the more I have trouble believing any of the fanboys here are real, and not just massive trolls. Surely though, there are better things to be doing than sitting on the internet pretending to be something that you're not for ABSOLUTELY no purpose at all.
Good, so it fits on one DVD, I don't see the problem.SaltyMeatballsAnd will be inferior because of it. Don't see how it being on one disc is a good thing if quality is sacrificed.
I wanted to get this game on the 360, but with this news, I shall buy it on PS3.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment