The X360 port of Dark Souls is heavily compressed to stay on one disc

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Twin-Blade
Twin-Blade

6806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 Twin-Blade
Member since 2005 • 6806 Posts

Though I doubt it will matter, I'd still prefer multiple disks. Either way, cows will make DS PS3 > DS 360 to be something like Bayonetta 360 > Bayonetta PS3. They'll still get the same score at Gamespot though.

Avatar image for mztazmz
mztazmz

1405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 mztazmz
Member since 2003 • 1405 Posts

[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"] ""then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray."" you didn't say less compressed you said compressed at all.

WilliamRLBaker

ok, if only you read the posts above... my point is, dvd is last gen format cuz it has less storage space thus more compressed data. this make any sense?

I dont need to look at the posts above. I need only look at the one post you replied too and that is compression is vital to game development. you replied that on bluray no game requires compression this is completely an utterly false games wouldn't fit on current bluray levels, in ram, and would require hours of load time with absolutely no compression.

Compression does not make dvd a last generation format since compression is even used today.

Yup, you're right. Compression does not make dvd a last generation format.

What DOES make it a last generation format is the fact that it was the standard format for 2 out of 3 last gen consoles.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51610

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51610 Posts

IGN crappy article.

They state the audio for 360, although they're wrong about Ps3 too. I just know 360 didn't have it when I had a 360 which was about 5 months ago.

Here we go, fom AVforusm.

"The PS3 has 7.1 support including lossless audio, while the 360 is limited to 5.1 and has no lossless audio support."

Avatar image for Snugenz
Snugenz

13388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 Snugenz
Member since 2006 • 13388 Posts

IGN crappy article.

They state the audio for 360, although they're wrong about Ps3 too. I just know 360 didn't have it when I had a 360 which was about 5 months ago.

Chutebox

Wait, what exactly are you talking about?

Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts
For those who doesn't think that compression=less quality and especially those who have been arguing with me. I finally have proof. Why don't the devs compress the ENTIRE DATA if it doesn't affect quality so they can make more room for more data. BINGO Because the fact that they want as much as uncompress data as possible just means that more compression=less quality.
Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#157 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45493 Posts
the compression difference is probably over uncompressed audio on the PS3 version and pre-rendered HD cinematics, if everything can fit on one disc I don't imagine the game is sacrificing space for texture files and code
Avatar image for mztazmz
mztazmz

1405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 mztazmz
Member since 2003 • 1405 Posts

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="Snugenz"]

Where's you proof that the 360 doesnt do lossless compression?

Snugenz

Because it doesn't. Unless MS updated teh 360, in audio, it still can't.

"Because it doesn't" Best proof ever !!

Sorry but he's right. There has not been a single 360 game to date that has lossless audio and the reason is simple. It's not because the 360 can't handle it, it's because lossless audio on DVD would eat up way too much space.

Example: The AUDIO ALONE on Heavenly Sword took up 10GB's which is more than an entire DVD. Of course on Bluray, that left 15GB's for the rest of the game so no problem there.

There's no way a dev will ever do lossless audio on a 360 game.

Avatar image for Pray_to_me
Pray_to_me

4041

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 Pray_to_me
Member since 2011 • 4041 Posts

Rage, Dead Space 2, LA Noire, Mass Effect 2, Witcher 2. The list of games shipping on more then a singlle DVD is growing not shrinking. Me? I'd rather have a game on a single bluray or as we see here in the case of dark souls, waaaaaay less compression. . That's just my preference. Others, they seem not to care. Yet still others will spend hundreds or even thousands to have the lattest and greatest GPU but will rabidly defend the ancient dvd format. That's right DVD is 1997 tech. Not 2007 1997. That's 14 years bro. There are kids in high school that are younger then DVD. Time to move on.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51610

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51610 Posts

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

IGN crappy article.

They state the audio for 360, although they're wrong about Ps3 too. I just know 360 didn't have it when I had a 360 which was about 5 months ago.

Snugenz

Wait, what exactly are you talking about?

Updated that post and I'm talking about lossless audio.
Avatar image for Snugenz
Snugenz

13388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 Snugenz
Member since 2006 • 13388 Posts

[QUOTE="Snugenz"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"] Because it doesn't. Unless MS updated teh 360, in audio, it still can't.mztazmz

"Because it doesn't" Best proof ever !!

Sorry but he's right. There has not been a single 360 game to date that has lossless audio and the reason is simple. It's not because the 360 can't handle it, it's because lossless audio on DVD would eat up way too much space.

Example: The AUDIO ALONE on Heavenly Sword took up 10GB's which is more than an entire DVD. Of course on Bluray, that left 15GB's for the rest of the game so no problem there.

There's no way a dev will ever do lossless audio on a 360 game.

But the discussion isnt about uncompressed data, its whether or not compression automatically = less quality. And correct me if i'm wrong, but there's a difference between uncompressed data and lossless compression?.

Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts

Rage, Dead Space 2, LA Noire, Mass Effect 2, Witcher 2. The list of games shipping on more then a singlle DVD is growing not shrinking. Me? I'd rather have a game on a single bluray or as we see here in the case of dark souls, waaaaaay less compression. . That's just my preference. Others, they seem not to care. Yet still others will spend hundreds or even thousands to have the lattest and greatest GPU but will rabidly defend the ancient dvd format. That's right DVD is 1997 tech. Not 2007 1997. That's 14 years bro. There are kids in high school that are younger then DVD. Time to move on.

Pray_to_me
LOL! Idk why, but I thought that entire comment was funny. But that just shows how important blu ray is. Don't underetimate it, blu ray is getting faster readings these days so installations in the future will not be a problem. Blu-ray is future proof as the ps3 is. Wow, 360 and ps3 has been reversing powers these days. Seems like everything is going opposite directions for these two systems. 360 has no games, just like ps3 back in the beginning.
Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts
[QUOTE="Snugenz"]

[QUOTE="mztazmz"]

[QUOTE="Snugenz"]

"Because it doesn't" Best proof ever !!

Sorry but he's right. There has not been a single 360 game to date that has lossless audio and the reason is simple. It's not because the 360 can't handle it, it's because lossless audio on DVD would eat up way too much space.

Example: The AUDIO ALONE on Heavenly Sword took up 10GB's which is more than an entire DVD. Of course on Bluray, that left 15GB's for the rest of the game so no problem there.

There's no way a dev will ever do lossless audio on a 360 game.

But the discussion isnt about uncompressed data, its whether or not compression automatically = less quality. And correct me if i'm wrong, but there's a difference between uncompressed data and lossless compression?.

Yes, there is a difference. lossless compression just get rid of unneeded data therefore the quality stays the same. HOWEVER, my whole point was that compression=less quality MOST OF THE TIME. Just saying that if it's not lossless compression, it means lesss quality automatically no matter what.
Avatar image for Pray_to_me
Pray_to_me

4041

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 Pray_to_me
Member since 2011 • 4041 Posts

Could be a major hit on texture quality, resolution, animations, fun factor. You name it.

I'm kinda kidding about the fun factor part but not really. It's possible that so many sacrifices are made the game winds up being straight up not as fun.

Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts
[QUOTE="Pray_to_me"]

Could be a major hit on texture quality, resolution, animations, fun factor. You name it.

I'm kinda kidding about the fun factor part but not really. It's possible that so many sacrifices are made the game winds up being straight up not as fun.

The reasons why games from this generation aren't as fun is because development costs are too high. Therefore, less risks being taken and therefore less fun games because there's less variety of games and more similar games. *cough fps cough* And at the same time.... most of sw warriors are favoriting this generation and yet they complain about short more boring similar games. Jesus. System wars is a fine place, what an entertainment lulz.
Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#167 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

[QUOTE="The_RedLion"][QUOTE="Nintendonly"]

I'd assume the fact the Xbox 360 version has to be compressed onto one DVD would be the clue.

sethman410

yes and? compression is vital in game development that doesn't make it last gen or anything

then explain why it doesnt need to be compressed on blu ray.

But it does, that is, if they want to keep loading times low. It's faster for the CPU to decompress than to read a large amount of uncompressed data.

Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#168 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

Could be a major hit on texture quality, resolution, animations, fun factor. You name it.

I'm kinda kidding about the fun factor part but not really. It's possible that so many sacrifices are made the game winds up being straight up not as fun.

Pray_to_me
Good thing compression sacrifices none of the things you mentioned.
Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts
[QUOTE="themyth01"][QUOTE="Pray_to_me"]

Could be a major hit on texture quality, resolution, animations, fun factor. You name it.

I'm kinda kidding about the fun factor part but not really. It's possible that so many sacrifices are made the game winds up being straight up not as fun.

Good thing compression sacrifices none of the things you mentioned.

texture quality? I think it does for this. I agree on other ones.
Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#170 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="themyth01"][QUOTE="Pray_to_me"]

Could be a major hit on texture quality, resolution, animations, fun factor. You name it.

I'm kinda kidding about the fun factor part but not really. It's possible that so many sacrifices are made the game winds up being straight up not as fun.

Good thing compression sacrifices none of the things you mentioned.

texture quality? I think it does for this. I agree on other ones.

Not by compression. Texture quality may suffer if they decide to lower the resolution. To know why, just check what compression does to data.
Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#171 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts
[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="themyth01"] Good thing compression sacrifices none of the things you mentioned. themyth01
texture quality? I think it does for this. I agree on other ones.

Not by compression. Texture quality may suffer if they decide to lower the resolution. To know why, just check what compression does to data.

Well, what does compression sacrifice in? What areas do compression affect in?
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51610

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#172 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51610 Posts
[QUOTE="themyth01"][QUOTE="sethman410"] texture quality? I think it does for this. I agree on other ones.sethman410
Not by compression. Texture quality may suffer if they decide to lower the resolution. To know why, just check what compression does to data.

Well, what does compression sacrifice in? What areas do compression affect in?

Didn't one of the Dragon Ages suffer on 360 a bit because they wanted it on one (or two discs)? Pretty sure textures suffered as a result. I could be wrong.
Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#173 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="themyth01"][QUOTE="sethman410"] texture quality? I think it does for this. I agree on other ones.sethman410
Not by compression. Texture quality may suffer if they decide to lower the resolution. To know why, just check what compression does to data.

Well, what does compression sacrifice in? What areas do compression affect in?

It doesn't, compression simply uses up more CPU cycles because the data needs to be decompressed before it's processed. If the right compression algorithm is used, the data is exactly like the original. In some cases you don't want to wait for CPU decompression but for most things nowadays CPU decompression is faster than reading a large amount of data in a disc. I've implemented some compression algorithms but I think this one is simple enough even a non-CS person can understand to see what compression does: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huffman_coding
Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="themyth01"] Not by compression. Texture quality may suffer if they decide to lower the resolution. To know why, just check what compression does to data. Chutebox
Well, what does compression sacrifice in? What areas do compression affect in?

Didn't one of the Dragon Ages suffer on 360 a bit because they wanted it on one (or two discs)? Pretty sure textures suffered as a result. I could be wrong.

Was it even noticeable?

Avatar image for Pray_to_me
Pray_to_me

4041

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 Pray_to_me
Member since 2011 • 4041 Posts

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="sethman410"] Well, what does compression sacrifice in? What areas do compression affect in?Bebi_vegeta

Didn't one of the Dragon Ages suffer on 360 a bit because they wanted it on one (or two discs)? Pretty sure textures suffered as a result. I could be wrong.

Was it even noticeable?

Noticable enough to drop the scrore.

Avatar image for dotWithShoes
dotWithShoes

5596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#176 dotWithShoes
Member since 2006 • 5596 Posts
[QUOTE="Pray_to_me"]

Rage, Dead Space 2, LA Noire, Mass Effect 2, Witcher 2. The list of games shipping on more then a singlle DVD is growing not shrinking. Me? I'd rather have a game on a single bluray or as we see here in the case of dark souls, waaaaaay less compression. . That's just my preference. Others, they seem not to care. Yet still others will spend hundreds or even thousands to have the lattest and greatest GPU but will rabidly defend the ancient dvd format. That's right DVD is 1997 tech. Not 2007 1997. That's 14 years bro. There are kids in high school that are younger then DVD. Time to move on.

sethman410
LOL! Idk why, but I thought that entire comment was funny. But that just shows how important blu ray is. Don't underetimate it, blu ray is getting faster readings these days so installations in the future will not be a problem. Blu-ray is future proof as the ps3 is. Wow, 360 and ps3 has been reversing powers these days. Seems like everything is going opposite directions for these two systems. 360 has no games, just like ps3 back in the beginning.

bluray read speeds are getting faster but ... I'm not completely sure about this, the bluray drive in my ps3 hasn't changed. Still took a good 30 minutes to install BioShock the other day.
Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"] Didn't one of the Dragon Ages suffer on 360 a bit because they wanted it on one (or two discs)? Pretty sure textures suffered as a result. I could be wrong.Pray_to_me

Was it even noticeable?

Noticable enough to drop the scrore.

Wow... and then people say there's no difference between console and PC games graphix wise... this is amazing.

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts
Demons Souls was only 5.8GB, so they probably have to compress audio a bit for 360 version of Demons Souls Nothing that will affect the game itself obviously, the game takes up minimal disk space
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

[QUOTE="sethman410"] ok, if only you read the posts above... my point is, dvd is last gen format cuz it has less storage space thus more compressed data. this make any sense?mztazmz

I dont need to look at the posts above. I need only look at the one post you replied too and that is compression is vital to game development. you replied that on bluray no game requires compression this is completely an utterly false games wouldn't fit on current bluray levels, in ram, and would require hours of load time with absolutely no compression.

Compression does not make dvd a last generation format since compression is even used today.

Yup, you're right. Compression does not make dvd a last generation format.

What DOES make it a last generation format is the fact that it was the standard format for 2 out of 3 last gen consoles.

um you do know that makes no sense? so by your example next generation if both the 360 and ps3 use bluray that makes it a last gen technology?

Avatar image for F1ame_Shie1d
F1ame_Shie1d

1389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 F1ame_Shie1d
Member since 2010 • 1389 Posts

[QUOTE="mztazmz"]

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

I dont need to look at the posts above. I need only look at the one post you replied too and that is compression is vital to game development. you replied that on bluray no game requires compression this is completely an utterly false games wouldn't fit on current bluray levels, in ram, and would require hours of load time with absolutely no compression.

Compression does not make dvd a last generation format since compression is even used today.

WilliamRLBaker

Yup, you're right. Compression does not make dvd a last generation format.

What DOES make it a last generation format is the fact that it was the standard format for 2 out of 3 last gen consoles.

um you do know that makes no sense? so by your example next generation if both the 360 and ps3 use bluray that makes it a last gen technology?

DVD is an old format. Doesn't make it a bad format or dead technology. But it is definitely last generation.

I remember at the beginning of this gen everyone said that blu-ray is not needed and now 360 games are either suffering(heavy compression, lackluster textures, etc) or being put on multiple discs.

360 definitely had the upper hand with its multiplats at the start of this gen but we're definitely seeing a paradigm shift these days.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

[QUOTE="mztazmz"] Yup, you're right. Compression does not make dvd a last generation format.

What DOES make it a last generation format is the fact that it was the standard format for 2 out of 3 last gen consoles.

F1ame_Shie1d

um you do know that makes no sense? so by your example next generation if both the 360 and ps3 use bluray that makes it a last gen technology?

DVD is an old format. Doesn't make it a bad format or dead technology. But it is definitely last generation.

I remember at the beginning of this gen everyone said that blu-ray is not needed and now 360 games are either suffering(heavy compression, lackluster textures, etc) or being put on multiple discs.

360 definitely had the upper hand with its multiplats at the start of this gen but we're definitely seeing a paradigm shift these days.

There is a major difference between it being an last generation format and saying its a last generation format for all the wrong reasons. compression doesn't make it a last generation format, it being standard doesn't make it a last generation format. I would love if people would start showing where I said it wasn't a last generation format instead of just showing people how wrong their concepts of why its a last generation format are.

Avatar image for ManicAce
ManicAce

3267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#182 ManicAce
Member since 2009 • 3267 Posts
I doubt most people can tell the differences that come from using DVD vs Blu-ray. Textures are mainly limited by Ram not storage space and the differences in audio quality are neglible. Pre-rendered cutscenes are propably where you could see the effects best. Blu-ray is obviously better but DVD has done the job this far, I doubt the space requirements will suddenly skyrocket in the middle of the generation.
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50182

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#183 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50182 Posts
[QUOTE="sethman410"] yes, thanks for the answer. thats why dvd is last gen....lol. is this hard?

Then... isn't Blu-ray last gen because of DD? lol I have over 100 games that I can play with just a couple clicks of a mouse. lol
Avatar image for xsubtownerx
xsubtownerx

10705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#184 xsubtownerx
Member since 2007 • 10705 Posts
Here we go again. The same old song, with the end result being both versions playing/looking the same when it's all set and done. Good job System Wars.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#185 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29845 Posts

I guess it all depends on the end product. If its compressed to the point that it makes the game worse, then I'll go PS3. However, most of my friends own 360s, so that is certainly a factor.

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#186 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10503 Posts

Guys you are taking this news completely the wrong way... Because its compressed, it means this game is BIG, cannot wait!

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29845 Posts

Guys you are taking this news completely the wrong way... Because its compressed, it means this game is BIG, cannot wait!

_Matt_
No, its because "teh blu-ray is better." :P
Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#189 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10503 Posts

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]

Guys you are taking this news completely the wrong way... Because its compressed, it means this game is BIG, cannot wait!

clone01

No, its because "teh blu-ray is better." :P

Oh sorry, my bad, am I not getting into the system wars spirit enough? ;)

Avatar image for CajunShooter
CajunShooter

5276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#190 CajunShooter
Member since 2006 • 5276 Posts

[QUOTE="sethman410"] yes, thanks for the answer. thats why dvd is last gen....lol. is this hard?Stevo_the_gamer
Then... isn't Blu-ray last gen because of DD? lol I have over 100 games that I can play with just a couple clicks of a mouse. lol

Physical storage and digital storage are completely different. As a physical storage choice DVD is starting to become outdated, there really isn't a way you can argue otherwise. That would be like arguing back in 2005 that VHS was still the right storage choice for movies or that CD-Rom should still be used for game storage.

However, Blu Ray may eventually have a shorter run than DVD ever did because of the advancements taking place in DD opportunities.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50182

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#191 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50182 Posts

Physical storage and digital storage are completely different. As a physical storage choice DVD is starting to become outdated, there really isn't a way you can argue otherwise. That would be like arguing back in 2005 that VHS was still the right storage choice for movies or that CD-Rom should still be used for game storage.

However, Blu Ray may eventually have a shorter run than DVD ever did because of the advancements taking place in DD opportunities.

CajunShooter

Different yet readily comparable under gaming and the notions behind the term "outdated" or "archaic." Physical media in its entirety is LAST GENERATION. Even if you disagree, the Blu-ray in the PS3 is outdated as f***--comparable to read speeds of an 8X DVD Drive. LOL

Avatar image for CajunShooter
CajunShooter

5276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 CajunShooter
Member since 2006 • 5276 Posts

[QUOTE="CajunShooter"]

Physical storage and digital storage are completely different. As a physical storage choice DVD is starting to become outdated, there really isn't a way you can argue otherwise. That would be like arguing back in 2005 that VHS was still the right storage choice for movies or that CD-Rom should still be used for game storage.

However, Blu Ray may eventually have a shorter run than DVD ever did because of the advancements taking place in DD opportunities.

Stevo_the_gamer

Different yet readily comparable under gaming and the notions behind the term "outdated" or "archaic." Physical media in its entirety is LAST GENERATION. Even if you disagree, the Blu-ray in the PS3 is outdated as f***--comparable to read speeds of an 8X DVD Drive. LOL

I did say that DD is starting to make Blu Ray outdated. DD still has a ways to go because of some limitations, but once it over comes them then, yes, it will make all physical media outdated.

My point was that defending DVD in 2011 is like defending CD-Rom in 2005.

Avatar image for lqcevox
lqcevox

265

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 lqcevox
Member since 2009 • 265 Posts

lol 1st ppl laughin for too many disc.. now ppl are laughin because itsonly 1 disc..? im so confused AAAAAAAAA

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50182

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#194 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50182 Posts

I did say that DD is starting to make Blu Ray outdated. DD still has a ways to go because of some limitations, but once it over comes them then, yes, it will make all physical media outdated.

My point was that defending DVD in 2011 is like defending CD-Rom in 2005.

CajunShooter

That's because saying so would be false, it's not "starting" ... it already made it outdated quite some time ago.

Avatar image for marklarmer
marklarmer

3883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#195 marklarmer
Member since 2004 • 3883 Posts

it really is time for a new console MS...and Sony, Halo 4 would be a great launch title aswell, but MS seem to have committed to Kinect now so god knows what that means in terms of when they will actually get with the times and come out with some new hardware.

Avatar image for the-obiwan
the-obiwan

3747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#196 the-obiwan
Member since 2003 • 3747 Posts

who wants some cupcakes :3 cute

Avatar image for CajunShooter
CajunShooter

5276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 CajunShooter
Member since 2006 • 5276 Posts

[QUOTE="CajunShooter"] I did say that DD is starting to make Blu Ray outdated. DD still has a ways to go because of some limitations, but once it over comes them then, yes, it will make all physical media outdated.

My point was that defending DVD in 2011 is like defending CD-Rom in 2005.

Stevo_the_gamer

That's because saying so would be false, it's not "starting" ... it already made it outdated quite some time ago.

Fine DD made Blu Ray outdated, but I don't see how this helps the argument that DVD isnt.
Avatar image for dommeus
dommeus

9433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#198 dommeus
Member since 2004 • 9433 Posts

The more time I spend in this...place...the more I have trouble believing any of the fanboys here are real, and not just massive trolls. Surely though, there are better things to be doing than sitting on the internet pretending to be something that you're not for ABSOLUTELY no purpose at all.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50182

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#199 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50182 Posts
[QUOTE="CajunShooter"] Fine DD made Blu Ray outdated, but I don't see how this helps the argument that DVD isnt.

I'm not helping anything, I just found it humorous that folks would jump on the DVD bandwagon, but take pride in Blu-ray. Both are outdated--physical media is an outdated practice. But brand loyalty is strong. lol!
Avatar image for Doolz2024
Doolz2024

9623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#200 Doolz2024
Member since 2007 • 9623 Posts

Good, so it fits on one DVD, I don't see the problem.SaltyMeatballs
And will be inferior because of it. Don't see how it being on one disc is a good thing if quality is sacrificed.

I wanted to get this game on the 360, but with this news, I shall buy it on PS3.