you still need proof he is a fanboy? lol ofcourse he isfifamessi
On a similer note, would you care to share your gamertag and why do you care about playing Mass Effect 2 if you didn't like the 1st one?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
you still need proof he is a fanboy? lol ofcourse he isfifamessi
On a similer note, would you care to share your gamertag and why do you care about playing Mass Effect 2 if you didn't like the 1st one?
[QUOTE="Sniper-PIG"]You didn't think this one through...lets have a look: Achievements - Basically unlockables with a new name and look. Wireless controller standard - This is innovative how? LOL Guide button - basically a start button with features, seen on the PSP b4 the 360 debuted. Detachable HDD - how is this innovative...consoles have had detachable units for years. warranty - NO, just NO...used only to mask the real issue and keep lawsuits out. Problem still lingers. Best controller - Its a dreamcast/cube controller thrown in one...nothing innovative..SORRY and besides...OPINION. Natal - isn't even OUT! haha Netflix - who cares. Xbox live - might give you this one. And yeah Sony is catching up, considering the 360 basically became the PS3 with its addons of HDMI, bigger HDD, HD-DVD, 1080p resolution. HAHA i'm done. :)AHUGECAT
Achievements - Basically unlockables that add to gamerscore and are very addicting
Wireless controller standard - no other system has had a wireless controller be standard
Guide button - a start button? LOL... it's NOTHNG like a start button and the PSP is a handheld machine. If the PSP innovated it then why is Sony's "guide button" a direct rip off of MS' guide button? That's right - MS innovated it
Detachable hard drive - the PS2 never came with a hard drive
Warranty - yes, just YES. When Sony's PS2's got DRE like crazy Sony said "HAHA! LOL @ YOU GUYS! NOW BUY ANOTHER PS2 SO WE CAN REACH 140 MILLION!" And the RROD is almost non-existant in new consoles
Best controller - yes, it is a dc/cube controller and it made it the best
NATAL - doesn't need to be out... already super innovative
Netflix - who cares? Tons of people do
HDMI, meh. Bigger HDD? That's not an innovation. HD DVD was for movies and not for games, and MS didn't even care about it all that much.
After reading "Halo 3: 10/10 (best game ever)" on your signature I understand why you made this... at first I thought it was just a joke or something but now I see.
By the way, LOL AT YOU all day long.
Actually the Magnavox Odyssey is the most innovative console of all time. Since everything else released just copies off of it...
This thread was hilarious :lol:
I've never seen so many angry fanboys in my entire time on gamespot. TC, you did well in this one man war ::lol:
TC - your claims and explanations, aren't much diffrent than charlotte saying she doesn't needs a jacket - they are both being followed by the same response.
(Watch the video to understand what I was just saying)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pXA2p0QgkA
Free three year warrantyAHUGECATis sig worthy :DThat is indeed true. Why do you say that it's "sooo wrong?" =\
You do know the three year warrenty was tacked on later because of the 360's high failure rate.....I don't call that innovative. Just because the 360 has alot of cool features does not make it the most of all time. K1LLR3175Not trying to disrespect you there killah, but atleast Microsoft did something for their customers when the consoles started dropping like flies...
[QUOTE="K1LLR3175"]You do know the three year warranty was tacked on later because of the 360's high failure rate.....I don't call that innovative. Just because the 360 has alot of cool features does not make it the most of all time. -GeordiLaForge-Not trying to disrespect you there killah, but atleast Microsoft did something for their customers when the consoles started dropping like flies...I understand that, and I respect that, but to add that to the list of what makes the console innovative?....It should defiantly go on the list for generosity.
Free three year warrantyAHUGECATis sig worthy :D i second that
[QUOTE="IlovemyAbs"]
This is LOL material! :lol:
nini200
Seconded. Clearly TC needs to research the term "Innovative".
Innovation:
When you think about it, lots of the stuff he listed are actually legit, save for free warranty and some others maybe.
You do know the three year warrenty was tacked on later because of the 360's high failure rate.....I don't call that innovative. Just because the 360 has alot of cool features does not make it the most of all time. K1LLR3175
Well the ps2 had a high failure-rate but they didn't offer a warranty did they? and the 360's failure rate has been confirmed by SquareTrade to be around 20-23%, only 10% higher than the ps3.
[QUOTE="Troqe"]
Am I supposed to take your opinion seriously after looking at your sig? I doubt you've played those games. I hate you.
AHUGECAT
I have played all the games in my sig and I am unbiased in my reviews (I even explain the low scores).
Don't go coo-coo if users give bad reviews to your 360 games, those are some of the best games on the ps3 and they got great reviews. It is pretty obvious that you're a 360 fanboy. I mean you give these 360 games high scores and those ps3 games low scores.[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"][QUOTE="Troqe"]
Am I supposed to take your opinion seriously after looking at your sig? I doubt you've played those games. I hate you.
Pices
I have played all the games in my sig and I am unbiased in my reviews (I even explain the low scores).
Don't go coo-coo if users give bad reviews to your 360 games, those are some of the best games on the ps3 and they got great reviews. It is pretty obvious that you're a 360 fanboy. I mean you give these 360 games high scores and those ps3 games low scores.360 games are simply better.
- Uncharted - way too short, only 7 hours... that's it? And it was $60 for the longest (hell I bought it used for like $50 a YEAR after it came out... wth?). Not to mention it's repetitive, the platforming is lame, the vehicle sections are just... not fun, and the puzzles are so easy I lol'd.
- Killzone 2 - generic FPS. Sony's attempt at a Halo and failed miserably. On the level of BLACK, Cold Winter and other PS2 FPS... okay game but as a flagship shooter? Nah. Lame story, bad controls, horrible art direction/character designs, boring weapons. Boring game.
- Metal Gear Solid 4 - bad AI, invisible walls, ugly color palette (horrible graphics), and the lack of gameplay hurts this game. Gets praised because of cinematics, not gameplay, being as there isn't any.
- Infamous - glitchfest, Sucker Punch should ask Ubisoft how to make a decent game about climbing on buildings. And only one power? Lol.
Don't go coo-coo if users give bad reviews to your 360 games, those are some of the best games on the ps3 and they got great reviews. It is pretty obvious that you're a 360 fanboy. I mean you give these 360 games high scores and those ps3 games low scores.[QUOTE="Pices"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]
I have played all the games in my sig and I am unbiased in my reviews (I even explain the low scores).
AHUGECAT
360 games are simply better.
- Uncharted - way too short, only 7 hours... that's it? And it was $60 for the longest (hell I bought it used for like $50 a YEAR after it came out... wth?). Not to mention it's repetitive, the platforming is lame, the vehicle sections are just... not fun, and the puzzles are so easy I lol'd.
- Killzone 2 - generic FPS. Sony's attempt at a Halo and failed miserably. On the level of BLACK, Cold Winter and other PS2 FPS... okay game but as a flagship shooter? Nah. Lame story, bad controls, horrible art direction/character designs, boring weapons. Boring game.
- Metal Gear Solid 4 - bad AI, invisible walls, ugly color palette (horrible graphics), and the lack of gameplay hurts this game. Gets praised because of cinematics, not gameplay, being as there isn't any.
- Infamous - glitchfest, Sucker Punch should ask Ubisoft how to make a decent game about climbing on buildings. And only one power? Lol.
* I could go ahead and say that ps3 games are better, it is just your damn opinion. * Those "flaws" of these games are pretty redundant. They got high scores. * I'll be happy to make biased flaws of your 360 games, but I'm not a fanboy[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"][QUOTE="Pices"] Don't go coo-coo if users give bad reviews to your 360 games, those are some of the best games on the ps3 and they got great reviews. It is pretty obvious that you're a 360 fanboy. I mean you give these 360 games high scores and those ps3 games low scores.Pices
360 games are simply better.
- Uncharted - way too short, only 7 hours... that's it? And it was $60 for the longest (hell I bought it used for like $50 a YEAR after it came out... wth?). Not to mention it's repetitive, the platforming is lame, the vehicle sections are just... not fun, and the puzzles are so easy I lol'd.
- Killzone 2 - generic FPS. Sony's attempt at a Halo and failed miserably. On the level of BLACK, Cold Winter and other PS2 FPS... okay game but as a flagship shooter? Nah. Lame story, bad controls, horrible art direction/character designs, boring weapons. Boring game.
- Metal Gear Solid 4 - bad AI, invisible walls, ugly color palette (horrible graphics), and the lack of gameplay hurts this game. Gets praised because of cinematics, not gameplay, being as there isn't any.
- Infamous - glitchfest, Sucker Punch should ask Ubisoft how to make a decent game about climbing on buildings. And only one power? Lol.
* I could go ahead and say that ps3 games are better, it is just your damn opinion. * Those "flaws" of these games are pretty redundant. They got high scores. * I'll be happy to make biased flaws of your 360 games, but I'm not a fanboyIf PS3 games are so great why are they getting dust on store shelves everywhere (with the exception of MGS4)?
* I could go ahead and say that ps3 games are better, it is just your damn opinion. * Those "flaws" of these games are pretty redundant. They got high scores. * I'll be happy to make biased flaws of your 360 games, but I'm not a fanboy[QUOTE="Pices"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]
360 games are simply better.
- Uncharted - way too short, only 7 hours... that's it? And it was $60 for the longest (hell I bought it used for like $50 a YEAR after it came out... wth?). Not to mention it's repetitive, the platforming is lame, the vehicle sections are just... not fun, and the puzzles are so easy I lol'd.
- Killzone 2 - generic FPS. Sony's attempt at a Halo and failed miserably. On the level of BLACK, Cold Winter and other PS2 FPS... okay game but as a flagship shooter? Nah. Lame story, bad controls, horrible art direction/character designs, boring weapons. Boring game.
- Metal Gear Solid 4 - bad AI, invisible walls, ugly color palette (horrible graphics), and the lack of gameplay hurts this game. Gets praised because of cinematics, not gameplay, being as there isn't any.
- Infamous - glitchfest, Sucker Punch should ask Ubisoft how to make a decent game about climbing on buildings. And only one power? Lol.
AHUGECAT
If PS3 games are so great why are they getting dust on store shelves everywhere (with the exception of MGS4)?
It is all a matter of personal preference, and I never said that ps3 games are better. Saying that 360 games are better is YOUr OPINION. Don't give me "sales" garbage.I have played all the games in my sig and I am unbiased in my reviews (I even explain the low scores).AHUGECAT
Problem is that reviewies is all about opinion and your opinion about PS3 as a hardware is bad (right? you show this opinion by bushing PS3 here), this will reflects on your game reviews as result. Look on PS3 fans, look on SolidRev videos for example, he have both systems (and even Red Elite 360), he publicly declered that he prefer PS3 and thinks it's better, as result he also thinks Halo 3 is G-word and Killzone 2 rox and we both know that K2 not sell very well. So you not very reliable as PS3 reviewer because of your hardware bias and if you ware reviewer in some professional website or magazine they propebly give you only 360 games to review.
[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]I have played all the games in my sig and I am unbiased in my reviews (I even explain the low scores).ShadowriverUB
Problem is that reviewies is all about opinion and your opinion about PS3 as a hardware is bad (right? you show this opinion by bushing PS3 here), this will reflects on your game reviews as result. Look on PS3 fans, look on SolidRev videos for example, he have both systems (and even Red Elite 360), he publicly declered that he prefer PS3 and thinks it's better, as result he also thinks Halo 3 is G-word and Killzone 2 rox and we both know that K2 not sell very well. So you not very reliable as PS3 reviewer because of your hardware bias and if you ware reviewer in some professional website or magazine they propebly give you only 360 games to review.
If Halo 3 is so bad why are there 164,000+ people playing it online right now (2pm pacific/california time)?
[QUOTE="ShadowriverUB"]
[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"] [QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]
[QUOTE="ShadowriverUB"]
[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]I have played all the games in my sig and I am unbiased in my reviews (I even explain the low scores).AHUGECAT
Problem is that reviewies is all about opinion and your opinion about PS3 as a hardware is bad (right? you show this opinion by bushing PS3 here), this will reflects on your game reviews as result. Look on PS3 fans, look on SolidRev videos for example, he have both systems (and even Red Elite 360), he publicly declered that he prefer PS3 and thinks it's better, as result he also thinks Halo 3 is G-word and Killzone 2 rox and we both know that K2 not sell very well. So you not very reliable as PS3 reviewer because of your hardware bias and if you ware reviewer in some professional website or magazine they propebly give you only 360 games to review.
If Halo 3 is so bad why are there 164,000+ people playing it online right now (2pm pacific/california time)?
Saying that a game is better just because of sales and number of people playing it is redundant. According to your logic, wii fit and wii play are better games than halo 3
You can't be serious. I mean this is almost as funny as that guy saying Heavy Rain looks better then Crysis.
It's always the huge fanboys who make the huge threads :x
Besides, I'd say that unfortunately, the Wii is the most innovative console, at least of this generation.
Saying that a game is better just because of sales and number of people playing it is redundant. According to your logic, wii fit and wii play are better games than halo 3
Pices
Wiiplay and Wii Fit are different types of games. Killzone 2 was supposed to be Sony's flagship shooter (a la Halo 3 and Gears of War) but failed. It's a boring game, and is super generic. I mean if it wasn't for the extra polygons it would've just looked like every other shooter out there.
If Halo 3 is so bad why are there 164,000+ people playing it online right now (2pm pacific/california time)?
AHUGECAT
*facepalm*
Are actually read my post or avoid actual facts? I'm saying you are hardware biased to 360 same as SolidRev for PS3 and he thinks that Halo 3 is bad and we both know it's not true. But you saying that MGS4 is bad, it's title on PS3 marked as AAA or even AAAA (have 10 on GS as only exclusive game in this gen) by professional reviewers (most of them are hardware neutral) reflects your hardware bias, same as SolidRev's Halo 3 hate. This makes you unreliable PS3 reviewer.
[QUOTE="Pices"]
Saying that a game is better just because of sales and number of people playing it is redundant. According to your logic, wii fit and wii play are better games than halo 3
AHUGECAT
Wiiplay and Wii Fit are different types of games. Killzone 2 was supposed to be Sony's flagship shooter (a la Halo 3 and Gears of War) but failed. It's a boring game, and is super generic. I mean if it wasn't for the extra polygons it would've just looked like every other shooter out there.
So you're telling me SIMS 3 on PC is the best game?
Why do people feed the troll?
Nobody likes you bro, no 360 is not the most innovative console, no Killzone 2 does not have 0 people online,and no Halo is not the best game ever made ever.
Blunt enough? If not I can just mention that most of the 360 games you argue against PS3 are multiplats, and you would probably hate those too if they were PS3 exclusives.
SPYDER0416
PS3 has lost so many exclusives it's almost become funny. Metal Gear Solid 4 got lucky, still don't know how that one got free.
So if MGS4 was on 360 I can guarantee you would be all over it. Don't even try and hide your bias, its pretty impossible when you call Uncharted 2 repetitive and yet Gears of War is pretty much sci-fi Uncharted without platforming or a coherent story and you put praise all over it. Plus you mostly cop out in your reviews by just stating that the game "just isn't fun' or "its a glitchfest" (I have yet to encounter an invisible wall in MGS4 or a 360 game with 70+ guns and mods you can play with in the game).
So yeah, you aren't fooling anyone.
So if MGS4 was on 360 I can guarantee you would be all over it. Don't even try and hide your bias, its pretty impossible when you call Uncharted 2 repetitive and yeat Gears of War is pretty much sci-fi Uncharted without platforming or a coherent story.
So yeah, get a life.
SPYDER0416
Actually if MGS4 was on the 360 I still wouldn't care for it. MGS2 was on the Xbox and I still hated MGS.
Well since you seem to love Final Fantasy and Tekken, no doubt Tekken 5 is a great game despite being PS3 exclusive, and FFXV will also be amazing despite yet again being PS3 exclusive.
Although you will probably just describe both as unfun glitchfests.
Well since you seem to love Final Fantasy and Tekken, no doubt Tekken 5 is a great game despite being PS3 exclusive, and FFXV will also be amazing despite yet again being PS3 exclusive.
Although you will probably just describe both as unfun glitchfests.
SPYDER0416
I don't like Tekken and Tekken 5 is on the PS2.
FFXIV will make it on the 360, and MMO's are best played on the PC anyways.
Well since you seem to love Final Fantasy and Tekken, no doubt Tekken 5 is a great game despite being PS3 exclusive, and FFXV will also be amazing despite yet again being PS3 exclusive.
Although you will probably just describe both as unfun glitchfests.
SPYDER0416
Don't bring up FF exclusivity, this perfect food for him ^^'
I'm talking about the MMO FF numbskull, its not on 360 only on PS3 and PC.I was also referring to Dark Resurrection. If you don't like Tekken, it makes me wonder why you are "excited" to play Tekken 6 on your 360.
Also, I sense you may say something about FFV being on PC, so I'll just say that Mass Effect, Left 4 Dead, Gears of War, and the first 2 Halo games are on PC. So when something is 360 exclusive, its on PC too.
And seriously? You gave Halo Wars a 9? You might as well say Too Human is an amazing game just for being on the 360.
I'm talking about the MMO FF numbskull, its not on 360 only on PS3 and PC.I was also referring to Dark Resurrection. If you don't like Tekken, it makes me wonder why you are "excited" to play Tekken 6 on your 360.
Also, I sense you may say something about FFV being on PC, so I'll just say that Mass Effect, Left 4 Dead, Gears of War, and the first 2 Halo games are on PC. So when something is 360 exclusive, its on PC too.
SPYDER0416
Final Fantasy XI AND XIII made it on the 360, XIV will as well. And Dark Resurrection is on the PSP too.... Tekken 6 is coming to the 360 and I like it just because I get to laugh at another lost Sony exclusive.
No, MMO's are best played on PC's. Period. MMO's are meant for PC's, but a game like Halo and Gears is meant for consoles.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment