This topic is locked from further discussion.
The link you said also states 360 version will run smoother.SaltyMeatballs
No, I mean like Bayonetta :D[QUOTE="The_RedLion"]
[QUOTE="hard_body79"]You mean like Dragon Age Origons?
PS3 version 9.0> xbox360 version 8.5 confirmed???
hard_body79
Lol, so now you're saying the 360 version has better visuals and proformance and the PS3 version is a last minute desicion port? Man you're despeate to say anything to defend the 360 now aren't you?
READ THE TEXT, it says the PC and PS3 are going to be doing more because THEY have more power. Lol, after that you just start making things up saying the 360 version is better, just wow.
Bayonetta Xbox 360 uses ATI/DX10 3DC+ texture compression format.
"You can see the game itself is a little tailored towards each platform, obviously," he said. "For example, the PC and the PS3, just based on the nature of the machines, have a little bit more power when it comes to graphical fidelity and things like that. So we're able to ramp it up a little higher. However, with the 360, especially when compared to the PS3, it's a little bit smoother machine. It's a little bit easier to work with, so we're able to do a little bit more as far as that goes."
[QUOTE="Snagal123"]Well, according to Michael Pachter who analyzes the video game industry for a living, says the PS3 is more powerful than 90% of the PCs while the 360 is only more powerful than 85% of the PCs.The PC has a little more power?
Doesn't he mean alot more power?
dragonboot
I watched a bonus round vid on GT filmed in 2009 where he said no PC is as powerful as a PS3 despite the fact that PS3's were behind gaming PC's the day the console launched.
[QUOTE="hard_body79"][QUOTE="The_RedLion"] No, I mean like Bayonetta :D
ronvalencia
Lol, so now you're saying the 360 version has better visuals and proformance and the PS3 version is a last minute desicion port? Man you're despeate to say anything to defend the 360 now aren't you?
READ THE TEXT, it says the PC and PS3 are going to be doing more because THEY have more power. Lol, after that you just start making things up saying the 360 version is better, just wow.
Bayonetta Xbox 360 uses ATI/DX10 3DC+ texture compression format.:? I never asked that nor do I care.
God of War 3 destroys it and everyting else on the xbox360 for that matter in graphics, how's that for random unrequested information?
[QUOTE="hard_body79"][QUOTE="Ravensmash"]Didn't John Carmack say they were equal? And didn't Crytek say 360 was better in some areas and PS3 in others ? Yeah, this kind of reaffirms my belief that they are pretty equal/close overall.Ravensmash
:lol: No he didn't
he said PS3 had more peak power as well but he liked xbox360 because it was simular to PC and had tools that made it easier for him to work with.
I don't know why you're laughing at me. http://beyond3d.com/content/news/751 Seems like both have advantages and disadvantages.Other people get to use the laughing face, is u bias on me using emotocons?
also: link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PFUw29U4J8
@ 29 seconds lies the answer to which you questioned .
Bayonetta Xbox 360 uses ATI/DX10 3DC+ texture compression format.[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="hard_body79"]
Lol, so now you're saying the 360 version has better visuals and proformance and the PS3 version is a last minute desicion port? Man you're despeate to say anything to defend the 360 now aren't you?
READ THE TEXT, it says the PC and PS3 are going to be doing more because THEY have more power. Lol, after that you just start making things up saying the 360 version is better, just wow.
hard_body79
:? I never asked that nor do I care.
God of War 3 destroys it and everyting else on the xbox360 for that matter in graphics, how's that for random unrequested information?
Even if it did, which it doesn't.. who cares? God of War was just an ok game. I'd take Alan Wake alone over it, you know why? it's a better GAME. Thats right, how they play matters, not just how they look.[QUOTE="hard_body79"][QUOTE="ronvalencia"] Bayonetta Xbox 360 uses ATI/DX10 3DC+ texture compression format.fastr
:? I never asked that nor do I care.
God of War 3 destroys it and everyting else on the xbox360 for that matter in graphics, how's that for random unrequested information?
Even if it did, which it doesn't.. who cares? God of War was just an ok game. I'd take Alan Wake alone over it, you know why? it's a better GAME. Thats right, how they play matters, not just how they look. you do know that GOW3 got a 9.0 here, while AW got a 8.5 right?:roll:[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="hard_body79"]
Lol, so now you're saying the 360 version has better visuals and proformance and the PS3 version is a last minute desicion port? Man you're despeate to say anything to defend the 360 now aren't you?
READ THE TEXT, it says the PC and PS3 are going to be doing more because THEY have more power. Lol, after that you just start making things up saying the 360 version is better, just wow.
Bayonetta Xbox 360 uses ATI/DX10 3DC+ texture compression format.:? I never asked that nor do I care.
God of War 3 destroys it and everyting else on the xbox360 for that matter in graphics, how's that for random unrequested information?
The point, PS3 doesn't have the bandwidth saving hardware feature hence one of the reasons why PS3 version is gimped.I don't know why you're laughing at me. http://beyond3d.com/content/news/751 Seems like both have advantages and disadvantages.[QUOTE="Ravensmash"][QUOTE="hard_body79"]
:lol: No he didn't
he said PS3 had more peak power as well but he liked xbox360 because it was simular to PC and had tools that made it easier for him to work with.
hard_body79
Other people get to use the laughing face, is u bias on me using emotocons?
also: link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PFUw29U4J8
@ 29 seconds lies the answer to which you questioned .
He also talks about how it's theoretical power, and Sony have limited themselves due to decisions made during the production, no? And that's a 2006 clip, and my link was to an article this year - from a game he's working on for release shortly.Even if it did, which it doesn't.. who cares? God of War was just an ok game. I'd take Alan Wake alone over it, you know why? it's a better GAME. Thats right, how they play matters, not just how they look. you do know that GOW3 got a 9.0 here, while AW got a 8.5 right?:roll: hahahhaha, you actually think the random number some reviewer picks out of the air matters? REALLY?[QUOTE="fastr"][QUOTE="hard_body79"]
:? I never asked that nor do I care.
God of War 3 destroys it and everyting else on the xbox360 for that matter in graphics, how's that for random unrequested information?
ermacness
I don't know why you're laughing at me. http://beyond3d.com/content/news/751 Seems like both have advantages and disadvantages.Ravensmash
Other people get to use the laughing face, is u bias on me using emotocons?
also: link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PFUw29U4J8
@ 29 seconds lies the answer to which you questioned .
He also talks about how it's theoretical power, and Sony have limited themselves due to decisions made during the production, no? And that's a 2006 clip, and my link was to an article this year - from a game he's working on for release shortly. As an example, RSX's "theoretical power" gets negated when you use texture fetch operations.[QUOTE="ermacness"]you do know that GOW3 got a 9.0 here, while AW got a 8.5 right?:roll: hahahhaha, you actually think the random number some reviewer picks out of the air matters? REALLY? but if it's so much of a "better" game like you state it is, wouldn't reviews show it? If it's your opinion, than fine, but since you put in a generalizing context, one must rely on reviews in this case, and in this case GOW3 have been given a higher review than AW[QUOTE="fastr"] Even if it did, which it doesn't.. who cares? God of War was just an ok game. I'd take Alan Wake alone over it, you know why? it's a better GAME. Thats right, how they play matters, not just how they look. fastr
Even if it did, which it doesn't.. who cares? God of War was just an ok game. I'd take Alan Wake alone over it, you know why? it's a better GAME. Thats right, how they play matters, not just how they look. you do know that GOW3 got a 9.0 here, while AW got a 8.5 right?:roll: And? What's your point?[QUOTE="fastr"][QUOTE="hard_body79"]
:? I never asked that nor do I care.
God of War 3 destroys it and everyting else on the xbox360 for that matter in graphics, how's that for random unrequested information?
ermacness
[QUOTE="hard_body79"][QUOTE="Ravensmash"] I don't know why you're laughing at me. http://beyond3d.com/content/news/751 Seems like both have advantages and disadvantages.Ravensmash
Other people get to use the laughing face, is u bias on me using emotocons?
also: link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PFUw29U4J8
@ 29 seconds lies the answer to which you questioned .
He also talks about how it's theoretical power, and Sony have limited themselves due to decisions made during the production, no? And that's a 2006 clip, and my link was to an article this year - from a game he's working on for release shortly. where have they limited themselves? well if i look at my 2007 reference guide where everyone (outside of sony) was keeping graphics solely on the rsx because they had no idea what the hell they were doing, i guess that whole "weaker" gpu had some weight and sony did limit themselves thank god they hired john olick to fix their erroneous ps3 beliefsI don't deal in Technical aspects, becasue going by what's on paper, the 360 superior GPU, and easy to work with tech suppose to allow the 360 to have superior looking games both exclusive and multiplat, but that isn't the case. I go by action, and going by actions, the ps3 have the better looking exclusives, while the 360 have the better looking multiplats most of the time.
[QUOTE="ermacness"]you do know that GOW3 got a 9.0 here, while AW got a 8.5 right?:roll: And? What's your point?My point is how can he generally state that AW is a better game than GOW3, when GOW3 recieved the higher score? I take it that you really didn';t take the time to really look at why i quoted him. You should do so.[QUOTE="fastr"] Even if it did, which it doesn't.. who cares? God of War was just an ok game. I'd take Alan Wake alone over it, you know why? it's a better GAME. Thats right, how they play matters, not just how they look. Ravensmash
[QUOTE="hard_body79"]
[QUOTE="The_RedLion"] No, I mean like Bayonetta :D
ronvalencia
Lol, so now you're saying the 360 version has better visuals and proformance and the PS3 version is a last minute desicion port? Man you're despeate to say anything to defend the 360 now aren't you?
READ THE TEXT, it says the PC and PS3 are going to be doing more because THEY have more power. Lol, after that you just start making things up saying the 360 version is better, just wow.
Bayonetta Xbox 360 uses ATI/DX10 3DC+ texture compression format.
"You can see the game itself is a little tailored towards each platform, obviously," he said. "For example, the PC and the PS3, just based on the nature of the machines, have a little bit more power when it comes to graphical fidelity and things like that. So we're able to ramp it up a little higher. However, with the 360, especially when compared to the PS3, it's a little bit smoother machine. It's a little bit easier to work with, so we're able to do a little bit more as far as that goes."
smoother macheine. It's a bit easier to work with....so we're able to do a little bit more as as that goes.
Smoother easier to work with? Everybody already know that buddy.
What you are not comprehending by trying to claim some ownage by putting "a little bit more" in bold is the context of what he said.
He didn't say anything about 360 being able to do what he PS3 could in power or graphics, (he was talking about smoothness and ease) it probably just means they can do "more" with the hardware in less "time" because it's easier to work with. You don't get any bownie points of pointing out the obvious.
But him pointing out PS3 being more poweful is something they specifically and directly stated. lemmings have less and less excuses everyday.
hahahhaha, you actually think the random number some reviewer picks out of the air matters? REALLY? but if it's so much of a "better" game like you state it is, wouldn't reviews show it? If it's your opinion, than fine, but since you put in a generalizing context, one must rely on reviews in this case, and in this case GOW3 have been given a higher review than AW So that one reviewer picked a random number that was lower then the other random number he picked.. and that means absolutely nothing to me, nor should it to anyone else. You can put all the value you want into it but lets face it, it doesn't matter at all.[QUOTE="fastr"][QUOTE="ermacness"]you do know that GOW3 got a 9.0 here, while AW got a 8.5 right?:roll:
ermacness
[QUOTE="Ravensmash"][QUOTE="hard_body79"]He also talks about how it's theoretical power, and Sony have limited themselves due to decisions made during the production, no? And that's a 2006 clip, and my link was to an article this year - from a game he's working on for release shortly. As an example, RSX's "theoretical power" gets negated when you use texture fetch operations. I wish I knew what that meant? :P I'm not really knowledgeable in depth about hardware and development :(Other people get to use the laughing face, is u bias on me using emotocons?
also: link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PFUw29U4J8
@ 29 seconds lies the answer to which you questioned .
ronvalencia
[QUOTE="ermacness"]but if it's so much of a "better" game like you state it is, wouldn't reviews show it? If it's your opinion, than fine, but since you put in a generalizing context, one must rely on reviews in this case, and in this case GOW3 have been given a higher review than AW So that one reviewer picked a random number that was lower then the other random number he picked.. and that means absolutely nothing to me, nor should it to anyone else. You can put all the value you want into it but lets face it, it doesn't matter at all. Of course it doesn't matter to you because the review doesn't favor YOUR game. I don't pay attention to reviews either, but if you're going to generalize an opinion like that, then we must go to reviews to see if the reviews matches your "generalized" opinions. If it's your opinion, then i can respect that, but you can't generally state that "AW is a better game than GOW3" without stating in some kind of way that this is your personal opinion, without getting bashed. You may prefer AW over GOW3, but the media don't.[QUOTE="fastr"] hahahhaha, you actually think the random number some reviewer picks out of the air matters? REALLY? fastr
So that one reviewer picked a random number that was lower then the other random number he picked.. and that means absolutely nothing to me, nor should it to anyone else. You can put all the value you want into it but lets face it, it doesn't matter at all. Of course it doesn't matter to you because the review doesn't favor YOUR game. I don't pay attention to reviews either, but if you're going to generalize an opinion like that, then we must go to reviews to see if the reviews matches your "generalized" opinions. If it's your opinion, then i can respect that, but you can't generally state that "AW is a better game than GOW3" without stating in some kind of way that this is your personal opinion, without getting bashed. You may prefer AW over GOW3, but the media don't. I don't pay attention to review scores at all, even if they matched the way I see them. Review scores are pointless, pay attention to what the review actually says in it, not the one number on top.[QUOTE="fastr"][QUOTE="ermacness"]but if it's so much of a "better" game like you state it is, wouldn't reviews show it? If it's your opinion, than fine, but since you put in a generalizing context, one must rely on reviews in this case, and in this case GOW3 have been given a higher review than AW
ermacness
it's kind of funny.
when the Split/Second developers said that they were equal in power, they were passed off as nobodys, and that they were just 'peddling' their games to people:roll:
then you have iD saying they're close/equal in power, and they're passed off as well. and APPARENTLY, the experts on the Xbox 360's power should be determined by all of Sony's 1st Party trying to say all their games can't be handled by the Xbox 360:lol: but in THIS scenario, they aren't peddling their games, are they;)
I'm not one to say the equal, in fact I guesstimated in Dragonboot's previous thread, on his previously banned account, Persistantthug that the PS3 is probably 10% more powerful.
just weird how iD is passed off and that those Split/Second developers meant nothing, but Two freaking Worlds do:lol:
[QUOTE="ermacness"]Of course it doesn't matter to you because the review doesn't favor YOUR game. I don't pay attention to reviews either, but if you're going to generalize an opinion like that, then we must go to reviews to see if the reviews matches your "generalized" opinions. If it's your opinion, then i can respect that, but you can't generally state that "AW is a better game than GOW3" without stating in some kind of way that this is your personal opinion, without getting bashed. You may prefer AW over GOW3, but the media don't. I don't pay attention to review scores at all, even if they matched the way I see them. Review scores are pointless, pay attention to what the review actually says in it, not the one number on top. Then you just can't openly say that "AW is a better game than GOW3" without going to reviews then. IF it's a better game to you, then fine, but to generally state such a claim while the reviews say otherwise is moot.[QUOTE="fastr"] So that one reviewer picked a random number that was lower then the other random number he picked.. and that means absolutely nothing to me, nor should it to anyone else. You can put all the value you want into it but lets face it, it doesn't matter at all. fastr
It's actually hilarious . I couldn't really care tbh if my console was more powerful or not, but there seems to be an awful lot of picking and choosing as to who cows believe.it's kind of funny.
when the Split/Second developers said that they were equal in power, cows passed them off as nobodys, and that they were just 'peddling' their games to people:roll:
then you have iD saying they're close/equal in power, and they're passed off as well. and APPARENTLY, the experts on the Xbox 360's power should be determined by all of Sony's 1st Party trying to say all their games can't be handled by the Xbox 360:lol: but in THIS scenario, they aren't peddling their games, are they;)
I'm not one to say the equal, in fact I guesstimated in Dragonboot's previous thread, on his previously banned account, Persistantthug that the PS3 is probably 10% more powerful.
just weird how iD is passed off and that those Split/Second developers meant nothing, but Two freaking Worlds do:lol:
HavocV3
[QUOTE="HavocV3"]It's actually hilarious . I couldn't really care tbh if my console was more powerful or not, but there seems to be an awful lot of picking and choosing as to who cows believe. cows are writing off john carmack? that must be why theyre using his quote regarding the ps3s power which according to him could only be achieved if developers put their blood and sweat in creating games for it thanks id for putting your blood and sweat into the ps3it's kind of funny.
when the Split/Second developers said that they were equal in power, cows passed them off as nobodys, and that they were just 'peddling' their games to people:roll:
then you have iD saying they're close/equal in power, and they're passed off as well. and APPARENTLY, the experts on the Xbox 360's power should be determined by all of Sony's 1st Party trying to say all their games can't be handled by the Xbox 360:lol: but in THIS scenario, they aren't peddling their games, are they;)
I'm not one to say the equal, in fact I guesstimated in Dragonboot's previous thread, on his previously banned account, Persistantthug that the PS3 is probably 10% more powerful.
just weird how iD is passed off and that those Split/Second developers meant nothing, but Two freaking Worlds do:lol:
Ravensmash
[QUOTE="HavocV3"]It's actually hilarious . I couldn't really care tbh if my console was more powerful or not, but there seems to be an awful lot of picking and choosing as to who cows believe.and you act like lems don't do it either. The lems don't really do it on a topic liek this because it's rare that a company or dev comes out and states that the 360 is more powerful.it's kind of funny.
when the Split/Second developers said that they were equal in power, cows passed them off as nobodys, and that they were just 'peddling' their games to people:roll:
then you have iD saying they're close/equal in power, and they're passed off as well. and APPARENTLY, the experts on the Xbox 360's power should be determined by all of Sony's 1st Party trying to say all their games can't be handled by the Xbox 360:lol: but in THIS scenario, they aren't peddling their games, are they;)
I'm not one to say the equal, in fact I guesstimated in Dragonboot's previous thread, on his previously banned account, Persistantthug that the PS3 is probably 10% more powerful.
just weird how iD is passed off and that those Split/Second developers meant nothing, but Two freaking Worlds do:lol:
Ravensmash
[QUOTE="HavocV3"]It's actually hilarious . I couldn't really care tbh if my console was more powerful or not, but there seems to be an awful lot of picking and choosing as to who cows believe.it's kind of funny.
when the Split/Second developers said that they were equal in power, cows passed them off as nobodys, and that they were just 'peddling' their games to people:roll:
then you have iD saying they're close/equal in power, and they're passed off as well. and APPARENTLY, the experts on the Xbox 360's power should be determined by all of Sony's 1st Party trying to say all their games can't be handled by the Xbox 360:lol: but in THIS scenario, they aren't peddling their games, are they;)
I'm not one to say the equal, in fact I guesstimated in Dragonboot's previous thread, on his previously banned account, Persistantthug that the PS3 is probably 10% more powerful.
just weird how iD is passed off and that those Split/Second developers meant nothing, but Two freaking Worlds do:lol:
Ravensmash
that's how total fanboys work I guess.
if I went with anyone. iD would be the most credible. not the developer under Disney or this Two World's developer.
and surely not Sony's 1st party, I don't understand why people insist that they know the 360 in and out:|.
Gears 3 seems(still have to wait) to prove otherwise, to the point, it's just pick and choose, the game looks great. but fanboys on both sides will downplay or overhype the game to their advantage. it's a shame.
if it does come close, I expect to see full explanations, and they'll be full of BS as to why it's just BLOWN OUT OF THE WATER BECAUSE I SAID SO:roll:
lemmings have less and less excuses everyday.hard_body79
Agreed. It seems like they been giving Microsoft and Xbox 360 way too many excuses for way too long. It's time they just give up.
it's kind of funny.
when the Split/Second developers said that they were equal in power, they were passed off as nobodys, and that they were just 'peddling' their games to people:roll:
then you have iD saying they're close/equal in power, and they're passed off as well. and APPARENTLY, the experts on the Xbox 360's power should be determined by all of Sony's 1st Party trying to say all their games can't be handled by the Xbox 360:lol: but in THIS scenario, they aren't peddling their games, are they;)
I'm not one to say the equal, in fact I guesstimated in Dragonboot's previous thread, on his previously banned account, Persistantthug that the PS3 is probably 10% more powerful.
just weird how iD is passed off and that those Split/Second developers meant nothing, but Two freaking Worlds do:lol:
I wonder why this post has been so conveniently ignored.The PC has a little more power?
Doesn't he mean alot more power?
Snagal123
In fact YES PC has lots more power. BUTI think he is talking about the average mid level computer gamer. It is still more powerful than PS3 or Xbox 360
It's actually hilarious . I couldn't really care tbh if my console was more powerful or not, but there seems to be an awful lot of picking and choosing as to who cows believe.[QUOTE="Ravensmash"][QUOTE="HavocV3"]
it's kind of funny.
when the Split/Second developers said that they were equal in power, cows passed them off as nobodys, and that they were just 'peddling' their games to people:roll:
then you have iD saying they're close/equal in power, and they're passed off as well. and APPARENTLY, the experts on the Xbox 360's power should be determined by all of Sony's 1st Party trying to say all their games can't be handled by the Xbox 360:lol: but in THIS scenario, they aren't peddling their games, are they;)
I'm not one to say the equal, in fact I guesstimated in Dragonboot's previous thread, on his previously banned account, Persistantthug that the PS3 is probably 10% more powerful.
just weird how iD is passed off and that those Split/Second developers meant nothing, but Two freaking Worlds do:lol:
HavocV3
that's how total fanboys work I guess.
if I went with anyone. iD would be the most credible. not the developer under Disney or this Two World's developer.
and surely not Sony's 1st party, I don't understand why people insist that they know the 360 in and out:|.
Gears 3 seems(still have to wait) to prove otherwise, to the point, it's just pick and choose, the game looks great. but fanboys on both sides will downplay or overhype the game to their advantage. it's a shame.
if it does come close, I expect to see full explanations, and they'll be full of BS as to why it's just BLOWN OUT OF THE WATER BECAUSE I SAID SO:roll:
:cry: but when will the excuses end? Lemmings still quoting theortical power of a console that came out a year before PS3 lol.
BTW: Carmak said PS3 has more peak power than xbox360. I already posted a link to the video where he said it.
[QUOTE="TintedEyes"]pretty much Cows have less and less excuses everyday for being in third. O wait.. I mean last. ouch now sales have to be brought in, thats how you know damage was done[QUOTE="hard_body79"] lemmings have less and less excuses everyday.
fastr
[QUOTE="TintedEyes"]pretty much Cows have less and less excuses everyday for being in third. O wait.. I mean last. in which the gap is getting smaller and amaller by the day.:lol:[QUOTE="hard_body79"] lemmings have less and less excuses everyday.
fastr
Pretty good for a console that was deemed "the dreamcast" of this gen. Don't ya think?
[QUOTE="hard_body79"] lemmings have less and less excuses everyday.
pretty much Cows have less and less excuses everyday for being in third. O wait.. I mean last. LOL when lems bring up sales. If your not first, your last so both 360 and PS3 are last in sales but in terms of games, both 360 and wii are in last.[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]
[QUOTE="hard_body79"]
Lol, so now you're saying the 360 version has better visuals and proformance and the PS3 version is a last minute desicion port? Man you're despeate to say anything to defend the 360 now aren't you?
READ THE TEXT, it says the PC and PS3 are going to be doing more because THEY have more power. Lol, after that you just start making things up saying the 360 version is better, just wow.
hard_body79
Bayonetta Xbox 360 uses ATI/DX10 3DC+ texture compression format.
"You can see the game itself is a little tailored towards each platform, obviously," he said. "For example, the PC and the PS3, just based on the nature of the machines, have a little bit more power when it comes to graphical fidelity and things like that. So we're able to ramp it up a little higher. However, with the 360, especially when compared to the PS3, it's a little bit smoother machine. It's a little bit easier to work with, so we're able to do a little bit more as far as that goes."
smoother macheine. It's a bit easier to work with....so we're able to do a little bit more as as that goes.
Smoother easier to work with? Everybody already know that buddy.
What you are not comprehending by trying to claim some ownage by putting "a little bit more" in bold is the context of what he said.
He didn't say anything about 360 being able to do what he PS3 could in power or graphics, (he was talking about smoothness and ease) it probably just means they can do "more" with the hardware in less "time" because it's easier to work with. You don't get any bownie points of pointing out the obvious.
But him pointing out PS3 being more poweful is something they specifically and directly stated. lemmings have less and less excuses everyday.
The text in bold refers to the extracting effective performance. Theoretical performance is largely academic.This mirrors JC's "peak performance" statement.
Another issue is XBox 360's Tessellation hardware feature.
Anybody who genuinly believed that the 360 was of = power to the PS3 was dreaming. While the difference is slight, there is a difference. It's also funny to see the all the lems damage controlling and the hermits crying PC is waaaay more powerful than consoles. We all know that so stop stating the obvious.gamebreakerz__There's a good bet, a PC with Geforce 8800 GTX(Nov 2006) will render TW2 greater than consoles's 1280x720p 30 FPS.
I don't deal in Technical aspects, becasue going by what's on paper, the 360 superior GPU, and easy to work with tech suppose to allow the 360 to have superior looking games both exclusive and multiplat, but that isn't the case. I go by action, and going by actions, the ps3 have the better looking exclusives, while the 360 have the better looking multiplats most of the time.
ermacness
NVIDIA G7X/RSX's pixel shaders stalls during texture fetch. On paper, RSX looks good. NVIDIA G80 solved this stall issue by swapping the stalled shader thread with non-stalled shader thread i.e. refer to NVIDIA's Giga-Thread technology. This maximises hardware usage. Think of Intel Hyper-Threading for GPUs.
I have a list of what-not-to-do on RSX/G7X GPU.
One question I would ask TW2's devs is the use partial precision floating point** in shader programs with RSX.
**another NVIDIA "The Way It's Meant To be Played" BS from Geforce FX era.
ATI Xenos implements 64 shader threads over 48 unified shaders/stream processors. ATI Radeon HD X1600/X1800/X1900 and Radeon HDs includes ATI Ultra-Threads technology.
The PC (with "fat" GpGPU) has both peek and effective performance.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment