[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"] And I'm not deflecting anything. This day in age, popular is the definition of shit for the most part.clone01
Yep, and snap-on tools sell tremendously well. Didn't respond to the Honda Accord, I see. Keep backpeddling, elitist. You still keep deflecting. Wouldn't party chat, a service offered on XBL and not on PSN, be of value to some? A simple yes/no will suffice.Â
PARTY CHAT IS FREE ON PS VITAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.......:lol:
And let me kill your argument even more PSN has Home which regarless of you caring or no for it,is 100 times better than lame ass party chat,party chat just serve to talk,home is a gaming app free,where you can communicate with friends to,how can this be on a free service,with less ads than a charge to play service.?
Then there is Netflix which is better on PSN and free of any pay scheme,how about hulu.? Internet explorer really.? The PS3 has had a browser since launch.
I know your answer already since i have already debate this with you,oh but party chat is not on PSN,Party chat or (voice cheat) is not on PSN because of the PS3 memory configuration as simple as that,even the Vita has it and is less powerful than the PS3,but it has more ram to work with than the PS3 so it gets party chat.
There is not a single justification for xbox live,and it has no value what so ever,you pay and you get nothing out of it,but access to things that every one else already get for free else where that is simple stupid and sad,you pay because you are force to,if you don't pay you don't play as simple as that,you miss a complete part of your games,which on PS3 doesn't happen.
So which is superior in the end.?
Log in to comment