Why does the "PC gaming is too expensive" argument still rage on??

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for PC4lifeman2233
PC4lifeman2233

479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#351 PC4lifeman2233
Member since 2012 • 479 Posts
[QUOTE="vtoshkatur"]

[QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]

Only if you never login to Steam ever again, as long as the games are installed on that PC, then you can play them in offline mode and the game won't know it's disabled.

If you mistakenly connect to Steam, it updates your permissions "wah wah wah" you can't run games you supposedly own.

What I've never understood is this.

Why do people defend Steam.

Blind fanboys.

Steam hijacks your platform. Wake up.

Shielder7

Wow you're right I'm stupid

There fixed it for you

You can run SP games offline just fine in Steam... You're stupid.
Avatar image for FashionFreak
FashionFreak

2326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#352 FashionFreak
Member since 2004 • 2326 Posts

[QUOTE="vtoshkatur"]

[QUOTE="Shielder7"] If he hasn't upgrades in 4 years and can still play all "NEW" games at "Recommended Settings" than he bought a BEAST of a machine. 3000$ vs 300 you decide which is cheaper. kraken2109

You have no idea what you're talking about do you. Go back to playing with your toy kid.

Erm £1000 4 years ago would run all games at recommended settings. Remember they're held back by consoles. I never see recommended requirements higher than HD4850/GTX260

"recommended" doesn't always mean "maxed 1080p", though. It will be very playable, though