You just can't beat PC graphics...

Avatar image for blackhairedhero
Blackhairedhero

3231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#201 Blackhairedhero
Member since 2018 • 3231 Posts

It looks good but it doesn't look far beyond what I'm playing now. Take into account a $1000 card struggles to hit 1080p 60fps on those settings it seems like a lot of horsepower for something that doesn't make a massive difference.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#202  Edited By TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@blackhairedhero said:

It looks good but it doesn't look far beyond what I'm playing now. Take into account a $1000 card struggles to hit 1080p 60fps on those settings it seems like a lot of horsepower for something that doesn't make a massive difference.

for likely longer than a decade the price point 'sweet spot' is $200 and $400. If you pay more than $400 for a video card you are paying too early and should wait 6 months or so for those cards to hit the sweet spot. Because your ROI after $400 drops quickly.

once you see the pattern its fairly simple to follow

Avatar image for blackhairedhero
Blackhairedhero

3231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#203  Edited By Blackhairedhero
Member since 2018 • 3231 Posts

@tryit: At this rate the time a $400 card runs that at max settings and playable framerates will be what ?5 years from now?

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#204 TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@blackhairedhero said:

@tryit: At this rate the time a $400 card runs that at max settings and playable framerates will be 5 years from now.

same rule applies to 'max settings'

basically run everything and have all hardware at about 70% of top of the line. because the top tier at any given time the ROI decreases quickly.

It would be easier for me to explain on a white board how this works.

Avatar image for slimdogmilionar
slimdogmilionar

1345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#206 slimdogmilionar
Member since 2014 • 1345 Posts

@recloud: no but DF already did this in 2013, for $500 you could build a pc with a 750ti that beats the PS4. Then instead of $400 to upgrade you could’ve spent $220 on a 8gb RX 480 and be better off than you would’ve been going the ps4/ps4 pro route.

Avatar image for recloud
ReCloud

4418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#207  Edited By ReCloud
Member since 2018 • 4418 Posts

@slimdogmilionar: thanks, but no thanks, I'd still rather the $400 that'll last the whole generation (or even better, the $350 or $300 when they get their mandatory price cut) than the $500~720 PC plus the mandatory GPU upgrade since the $500 PC won't last till the end of the generation.

I'd rather spend that money on the actual games.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b8284346a788
deactivated-5b8284346a788

295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#208  Edited By deactivated-5b8284346a788
Member since 2018 • 295 Posts

@recloud said:

@kali-b1rd: mid gen upgrades are not necessary, the base consoles run the games fine on a 1080p TV. Nice goalpost move again lol.

Saying you're a enthusiast is pointless to the debate since most of the PC gamers are not enthusiasts and don't have the money to be, goalpost movement again lol.

And lol talking about the PS4 pro on 2022, this is completely lame and not related, PS4 pro was never the subject of the conversation, goalposts movements again lol

LMAO

You got owned by your spinning and deflection.

Avatar image for jereb31
Jereb31

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#209 Jereb31
Member since 2015 • 2025 Posts

@recloud said:

@slimdogmilionar: thanks, but no thanks, I'd still rather the $400 that'll last the whole generation (or even better, the $350 or $300 when they get their mandatory price cut) than the $500~720 PC plus the mandatory GPU upgrade since the $500 PC won't last till the end of the generation.

I'd rather spend that money on the actual games.

Why doesn't a PC bought at the beginning of a generation not last the generation again?

Avatar image for VanDammFan
VanDammFan

4783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#210 VanDammFan
Member since 2009 • 4783 Posts

this thread takes me back 20 years..literally...the same arguments over and over..never changes..

Avatar image for zaryia
Zaryia

21607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#211 Zaryia
Member since 2016 • 21607 Posts
@VanDammFan said:

this thread takes me back 20 years..literally...the same arguments over and over..never changes..

Yup, PC having the best gfx never changes.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#212 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@slimdogmilionar said:

@recloud: no but DF already did this in 2013, for $500 you could build a pc with a 750ti that beats the PS4. Then instead of $400 to upgrade you could’ve spent $220 on a 8gb RX 480 and be better off than you would’ve been going the ps4/ps4 pro route.

DF also shown PS4 beating 750 Ti in Doom 2016.

Avatar image for jereb31
Jereb31

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#213 Jereb31
Member since 2015 • 2025 Posts

@ronvalencia said:
@slimdogmilionar said:

@recloud: no but DF already did this in 2013, for $500 you could build a pc with a 750ti that beats the PS4. Then instead of $400 to upgrade you could’ve spent $220 on a 8gb RX 480 and be better off than you would’ve been going the ps4/ps4 pro route.

DF also shown PS4 beating 750 Ti in Doom 2016.

What was the performance of the PC as an average across many games? Better or worse than the PS4 in terms of performance?

Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#214 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 12194 Posts

@zaryia said:
@VanDammFan said:

this thread takes me back 20 years..literally...the same arguments over and over..never changes..

Yup, PC having the best gfx never changes.

PC being more expensive never changes.

Avatar image for jereb31
Jereb31

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#215 Jereb31
Member since 2015 • 2025 Posts

@xhawk27 said:
@zaryia said:
@VanDammFan said:

this thread takes me back 20 years..literally...the same arguments over and over..never changes..

Yup, PC having the best gfx never changes.

PC being more expensive never changes.

But generally Consoles become more expensive over time :D

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#216 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26715 Posts
@xhawk27 said:
@zaryia said:
@VanDammFan said:

this thread takes me back 20 years..literally...the same arguments over and over..never changes..

Yup, PC having the best gfx never changes.

PC being more expensive never changes.

So what was that thing you guys did this gen... Oh yeah, bought mid-gen refresh consoles for an extra 500 bucks on top of the first console. Yeah, that's right. Please. Don't try to say that PC gaming is that much more expensive than staying up with the current console tech now-a-days. Just like PC, you can buy the weak ass hardware and stick with it; you may just have crappy fps and graphics.

Avatar image for katiefortune
Katiefortune

10

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#217  Edited By Katiefortune
Member since 2018 • 10 Posts

@DragonfireXZ95: just checked out the video, I won't lie those are some nice color effects. They did a nice job with the graphics on it. No way you can compare pc graphics to console graphics.. they knock them out the park everytime. They better when you pay an arm and a leg for a video card.

Avatar image for aiswaryapv
aiswaryapv

8

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#218 aiswaryapv
Member since 2018 • 8 Posts

ghhOh damn

Avatar image for zaryia
Zaryia

21607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#219 Zaryia
Member since 2016 • 21607 Posts
@xhawk27 said:
@zaryia said:
@VanDammFan said:

this thread takes me back 20 years..literally...the same arguments over and over..never changes..

Yup, PC having the best gfx never changes.

PC being more expensive never changes.

Unless you kept your XB or PRO up to date. Then even your 1 advantage of price point kinda went away, combined with online charges.

Avatar image for henrythefifth
henrythefifth

2502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#220 henrythefifth
Member since 2016 • 2502 Posts

One of my pals has this outrageously expensive rig.

And his monitor is like 20 inches!

so, all that power, and he cannot really enjoy it because his display is so tiny!

Typical PC gamer morosity.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#221 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@jereb31 said:
@ronvalencia said:
@slimdogmilionar said:

@recloud: no but DF already did this in 2013, for $500 you could build a pc with a 750ti that beats the PS4. Then instead of $400 to upgrade you could’ve spent $220 on a 8gb RX 480 and be better off than you would’ve been going the ps4/ps4 pro route.

DF also shown PS4 beating 750 Ti in Doom 2016.

What was the performance of the PC as an average across many games? Better or worse than the PS4 in terms of performance?

Loading Video...

For Witcher 3, PS4 is similar to stock 750 Ti.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#222  Edited By mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60808 Posts

@recloud said:

And you can't beat console prices. So that's that.

It's incredibly depressing this is such an important point to console supporters; it becomes borderline devastating when you factor in that it's arguably the only positive to consoles these days. As you said, "that's that". Indeed, that is "that"...and only that.

How do you feel about people that drive quality cars instead of used Honda Accords? Or pay a premium for higher quality meat and produce to eat? Do you think the guy eating Twinkies has it better than the guy who payed ten times the price for a tasty pastry from a talented local baker, simply because he payed less?

@slimdogmilionar said:

Not too long ago people here where wondering if next gen consoles would be able to catch-up to PC, some even thought the the ps5 leak meant that PC’s would be no match/ irrelevant.

Speculation is gone so now it’s time for them to switch the argument back to console price point....Well you get what you pay for I guess.

Exactly.

They really don't have any other argument, which isn't really much of an argument. It's more of an admission if inferiority.

@rmpumper said:

A bunch of useless features to be honest. You won't even notice any of that when actually playing the game and to even see the benefits of ray tracing, you need to look at side by side comparisons.

I've had my GTX 980 for about five years. It still performs well. I plan to have it well into 2019.

I know ray tracing isn't common now, but it will be, and probably a helluva lot sooner than five years. More than enough time for people to get plenty of use out of their currently-unused, but soon-to-be-used tech features.

Avatar image for slimdogmilionar
slimdogmilionar

1345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#223 slimdogmilionar
Member since 2014 • 1345 Posts

@recloud: wtf, you saying that a gpu bought at the beginning of the console generation won’t last the whole gen? Consoles can’t keep up with any gpu released at the beginning of this gen, and you can get games way cheaper on PC than on console.

You guys still waiting for next gen consoles to get true 4K and in 2018 still don’t have 60fps standard. You pay to have devs tell you how you should play your games. Why have a hobby if someone else dictates what’s good for you and what’s not?