[QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"]

[QUOTE="Keir21"]You do know you can change the control scheme on KZ2 to be EXACTLY like call of duty? right? Its alternative 2 I believe.Cutekitten6_18

Sorry you are mistaken.It is nothing like MW2.

If i'm not mistaken, with Alternative 2 it makes : L1 zoom in, R3 is melee, R2 is frags, Triangle is weapon change, Square is reload, X is jump.. thats pretty COD-ish

I would prefer to use R2 to fire, L2 to zoom, R1 for grenades, L1 for knife,R3 for melee,B for crotch and X, square and triangle would stay the same.

The button mapping isn't the controllers fault, leave him out of it.

Loegi

But the design of the controller isn't the best either.

But granted when a played MGS4, the controller wasn't an issue to me that I can remember.

I like to play on the higher difficulties and KZ2's stupidily contrived control schemes along with the PS3 very loosey goosey thumb sticks makes for a very dissappointing experience.

Why doesn't Sony swallow its pride and make a contoller with the Xbox 360 superior design and yet have its superior D pad, it would be the best controller ever, but no, they want to sellus something that hasn't really changed for years.

You do know you can change the control scheme on KZ2 to be EXACTLY like call of duty? right? Its alternative 2 I believe.Keir21

Sorry you are mistaken.It is nothing like MW2.

It is a sad excuse for a controller and the Killzone 2control layouts all suck. All of them. It really ruins the experience for me. After playing Modern Warfare 2 on veteran on my 360 with it awesome controller and MW2 awesome control scheme killzone feels like broken crap.

Now if Guerrilla gave me a choice tomap my own keys or give a control scheme that makes sense then maybeI could tolerate the PS3 controller but Killzone 2 crap control scheme and the PS3 dinosaur of a controller totally ruin what would have been an awesome gaming experience andthat makes it even worse.

My rant is done.

No, but the fundemental truths of the universe lie just below your right foots little toe...fear the toe.

PC, it's obviously the best versionmgkennedy5

Thats like saying Taylor Swift is prettier than Miley Cyrus, does it really matter.

The only way a game would be exclusive to the PS3 is if MS passes on that game. Because MS gets first dibs on any game Bungie makes, it was in the terms between MS and Bungie when they split.

left for dead if a very fast twitch game, not a chance id play this with a controller, keyboard and mouse all the way for l4dTotalgym9000

Might as well play House of the Dead, the controller allows for a more frantic and edge of your seat experience, PC FPS shooters might as well be called shooting fish in a barrel.

I have a PS3 and an Xbox 360, so in my house it is exclusive to my 360, so it will be another great game in my 360 library.

PC can bite it.

[QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"]

[QUOTE="Panosola"]

Even and RE5 look better than U2...............

ChrisJ2004

Man no lie, this game looks awesome. UC2 should not be considered graphics king, RE5 should be. But what fun would that be right?

Only on PC does it look anywhere close to that. In which case, it's competing with Crysis and other games ... and it loses miserably.

Nobody cares about PC gaming dude, the consoles is where its at.

And Crysis sucked other than looking pretty and running well on some PC's, it really was a throw away game.

But since we are primaily talking about a PS3 game and an XBOX 360 game, which are console games, I would appreciate it if you left the PC out of this console debate.

And again RE5 look much better than Uncharted 2, when I see screens for UC2 it kinda reminds me of PD0 just with less jaggies and less plastic looking people.

Anyways that my opinion.