@JangoF-76 Thinking about all the info that is released about the game, the setting, the character, the new features, the new game engine, the location, the time period leads me to conclude one thing... I'm sorry bro, but you must suffer from some kind of blindness. You should check that out. :s
@happyguyhere I stopped reading at: "only saw minor change with nothing nothing significant to offer than the first one" (you, referring to AC1 and AC2 differences).
@Scorpion1813 On this I 100% agree with you man, I surely do. Don't see me as being offensive, it's just my way of having what I call a good discussion!
@Godien We'll see... Although on this trailer, I agree with you. But I surely expect and hope for a strong native american hero. Oh well, it's too soon to be sure that we won't have that. : ).
@Scorpion1813 Ok man, we'll stop at that, it's getting a long conversation and there is no need to get salty. And I know you never mentioned hating north-americans. I'm just defending the argument that this game isn't pro-one side as you are stating. But with so many comments about USA Vs Brits (lol, the real north americans are the native americans, not the brits, not the irish, not the scotish, not the italians) that have been trolling around it sounds like that. I mean, you play with a half native, half british.
And as harsh as it might sound to you, like in any other country, at that time, the Brits were ubber a**holes.
@Scorpion1813 Connor is caught in the middle of that fight. His village is destroyed, his family is murdered... And that's why he becomes an Asassin in the first place. So... Yeah, it's normal that the time period battle is the focus of the game, it is the beginning of the USA as a great nation of the world, it's the creation of a new nation. But all in all, like I said, it all comes down to Assassin's Vs Templars.
Now back on what made me reply to your comments, you are utterly wrong in saying that this is a pro-north american game. Specially where there is absolutely NO info or direction to that, other than seeing the flag with the stars and stripes. It's pure speculation based on that.
@Scorpion1813 You don't need to tell me that because, AC1 was my favorite game and the first I bought to the PS3... I've played it several times and I absolutely love it and it was my favorite... Until AC2 came out. lol. Plus, AC1 was on the dark ages, AC2 was on the renaissance, of course that the personalities of the characters is substantially different... One is a mystic time where everything was around religion, superstition and life and death, the other is when science started blossoming, art human culture, architecture, etc... It's two time periods separated by almost 400 years.
And saying that AC2 broke the immersion and believability of the games must have been because you haven't played the two games, straight in a long, long time because you couldn't be more wrong... About combat... It was harder... Because it wasn't refined, as simple as that. And the timing wasn't as precise as you mentioned. You are the one who really must replay the games... Now if you tell me that brotherhood made everything easier and stealth a bit more redundant, there, I can agree with you. But in 2 you have much more missions where you cannot be detected or the game will desynchronize than in 1.
Now, if you like more AC1 than AC2, there I can't argue, because that's entirely subjective.
@SergioMX @Scorpion1813 I mean, playing 2 after playing one is just a breath of fresh air. AC1 is awesome and as a cool dark, mysterious vibe, that is true... But claiming that it is better than 2, it's just juvenile nostalgia speaking.
Assemblent's comments