thats BS. if the game supports 1080p there should be no difference in framerate, screen tearing or load times. (unless your playing RSV where the UPSCALING is stuffed. by the way, id just like to say that on my 52 SONY BRAVIA XBR all of my games have improved framerates (AC goes 60, so does warhawk and COD4 goes like whipped cream :)bihboy69
Not bs.
Even if a game supports 1080p it has to render to a 1080p framebuffer (if it's true 1080p and not that crappy upscaled 540p) which is over 30% more data to render. Difference in resolution can mean a big difference in performance. crysis can support 1920x1200 resolution but I get 10fps on my PC at that resolution. I get a great framerate at 720p. Also, your tv has nothing to do with improving your framerate. That doesnt' even make sense. Framerate is a result of either of 2 things, not necessarily mutually exclusive, CPU spending too much time per frame, and/or graphics hardware taking too much time per frame. You could buy the most expensive tv in the whole world and it won't do a thing for your frame rate. ever.
[QUOTE="simo__93_"]I think he means "Will Sony add the equivelment of Microsoft Points to PSN??"elemental_drago
On a personal note, I think that from a marketing standpoint a point system was genius. From the consumer stand point, they drove me nuts as a consumer (when I owned the system). For the same reason, it's hard to tell how much you're truly spending. I greatly prefer the system employed by Sony for their own store (eg: a real currency!) Case in point, I really hope Sony never adopts that system. *fingers crossed*:P
the MS points thing is rediculous. I like being told how much actual money I'm going to be spending. I think acheivement points are stupid as well. Just play the dang game and have fun. If you feel you haven't gotten everything out of it, play it again. Life = 1 / Achievement Points. oh... yeah, and I completely agree with you :)
There is really no point in installing linux unless you plan to write programs for your ps3. Otherwise, if you'd like to replace Wind0ze with a good OS, might as well do it on your PC. Don't waste your time if you aren't going to do anything technical.
There are extremists in all religions. Just as there are terrorists that call themselves muslim, there are idiot wackos labeling themselves with one religion or another and giving everyone else a bad name. Personally, I'm athiest. I do not care whatsoever the things that other people believe. that's their business. The moment someone inflicts grief, pain, or ridicule upon me because I don't believe what they believe, my respect for them ends. Just as all terrorists should be put in a giant quarantine and burned alive. The so called christians that have the hate in them so deep that they would protest someone's funeral deserve the same treatment. Pool them all together in a trench and slowly melt them with sulfuric acid. Then the people real religious convictions, those who actually have peace and the desire to help others REGARDLESS of who they are or what they believe (it's called altruism, a characteristic that anyone who believes everyone else around them is their brother/sister should theoretically practice), would be able to do so without a bad name. Acts like this are revolting. How can you dare say that someone is going to hell when you are so self-important that you forget the teachings of your own religion and do the exact opposite of what you are supposed to do. If there is a god, who would he prefer? One who didn't necessarily acknowledge his presence but did no harm to others, or a cretin that uses his name as a shield when commiting the most unspeakable acts of hatred?
Log in to comment