Nobody but graphics-obsessed hermits are interested in Crysis, it looks incredibly uninteresting.

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

Every freakin' PS3 game has the horrible HDD install, yet the load times are the same across both versions and sometimes longer than the 360 version.

SolidTy

Wow.

What a hater. You are back to your old biased ways...ah well. Anyways, That's right there is VERY inaccurate.

Nice try though, and for the record, VF5 loads faster than the 360 version.

The PS3 VF5 ? Is that the one without online ?

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

40 bucks for a demo?

:cry:

-D3MO-

but $60 for a beta is perfectly acceptable :P

Lair ?

Most of you have probably seen the "PS3 has gone a year without any AAA e!!" thread. As you all know, that is according to GS. But, when GS gave an 8.5 to Mass Effect, lemmings went on a rampage, making threads like, "Mass Effect is AAA!!", and saying that GS was not credible anymore. Yet, Lems are making threads about how the PS3 has no AAA e in its first year. Now that's what I call hypocritical. biggamerhk

Kinda like when Cows went ballistic when R&C got reviewed ? Or when Lair got reviewed ("bu buh teh reviewerz dont know how tew control it!!! :cry: ) ?

At least Mass Effect DESERVED the outcry.

Quit saying this is a demo!

If this really is a demo, it is one of the biggest demos in video game history.

Rikusaki

LOL, it wont be a bigger demo than BioShock or, amusingly enough, Ace Combat 6.

The funniest thing about the PS3 is that the more Sony sell, the more potential there is for them to lose even more money, seen as the manufacturing price of the PS3 negates any profit made from the PS2 and PSP, and Sony are shifting ABYSMAL amounts of software that it's embarrassing.

But frankly, it's getting lame / old bashing the PS3. And very few left defending it.

Or maybe the few ps3 fans left are a bit more mature that lame threads like this no longer trigger interest.

Mystery_Writer

Oh PLEASE :roll: