[QUOTE="IronBass"]Our point was simply "the 360 has better library than a PS3". We didn't say "the 360 has the best library" neither "the 360 has the best exclusives". Simple:"the 360 has better library than a PS3". I don't know what has PC to do with that point :|
And, as I already said, the overall critic agrees that the 360 has better exclusives than the PS3, so I can't see your point.
Pariah_001
Your and his point was that you get more value with your buck from the 360 library (the very first thing he mentions is price). However, considering how many of the games are not truly exclusive, it defeats the point of cost-efficiency. It becomes apparent that there's more value in PC-PS3 than in PC-360.
Obamania wasn't just comparing games. He was comparing price for games.
What's more, I'm forced to point out that the most notable games on the 360 aren't simply apart of the "360 library" but rather the "PC-360 library."
I'm also forced to point out that a lot of the considered-to-be "better exclusives" (according to your blanket-statement) aren't actually because they went to PC and PS3.
I'm not sure why you brought the PC into this cause I'm pretty sure they were only talking value in terms of games between 360 and PS3. If thats the case consider this. If you only buy a 360 you will get any exclusives the 360 has, any multiplats shared between 360 and PS3, and any games shared between 360 and PC. If you only buy a PS3 on the otherhand you'd get any exclusives the PS3 has and any of the multiplats shared between the PS3 and 360. You'd be missing out on all the multipIats 360 and PC share. So basiclly you would have to buy either a 360 or PC if you cared about those games. So by you bringing the PC into this basiclly what you're saying is you'd need that PC as a PS3 only owner just to match what the 360 basicly has on its own in terms of value for games. 
Log in to comment