Well, that's Everything.

@walloftruth:Last I checked, 16:9 and 16:10 are two, not three.

As for "competitive advantage", every single other FPS on the market supports 21:9 with FoV sliders that go up an upwards of 150 (notably Quake Champions).

Blizzard didn't even want an FoV slider in the game to begin with, and low FoV is something that causes people nausea and headaches... and that's exactly what us 21:9 users suffer when we try to play in Overwatch's "21:9" mode, because it renders Vert-; something only suitable to older 4:3 and 5:4 aspect ratios.

Meanwhile, people like you defending people like Jeff Kaplan exist. I can't fathom why.

Proper support of PC monitor aspect ratios so people can play the game properly/comfortably should be far more important than throwaway loot boxes.

But no, Jeff Kaplan will be himself..

I bought the game on release and never actually played it more than a few times vs bots.

Whoops..

I did not expect this..

Guess that means the b.net launcher is turning into a terrible version of Steam.

@Barighm: Our PC specs don't change the FoV/viewing angles, resolution and refresh rate of the displays used in the device.

We're still waiting for Gen 2 VR, when the problems/barriers with Gen 1 will hopefully be fixed.

What irony.

Ugh, another Assassin's Creed-like franchise.

I didn't like 3 or 4, and I sure as hell won't like 5 either unless it's a huge departure from the previous two games.

Why do the top screenshots look like a 7 year old game but the bottom screenshots look like a modern one?

I still need to get around to playing it..

But this situation is just another one of the reasons why game preservation is very important.. and why licensing agreements suck.